Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Piezoelectric and functional properties of materials with coexisting ferroelectric and antiferroelectric phases

1 Science & Technology Center “Reaktivelektron” of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Donetsk, 81046, Ukraine
2 Department of Physics, South Dakota School of Mines & Technology, Rapid City, 57701, SD USA
† All three authors made equal contributions to this article.

Topical Section: Optical/Electronic/Magnetic properties

A brief review of investigations of lead zirconate-titanate based solid solutions with coexisting ferroelectric and antiferroelectric types of dipole ordering is presented. Our goal is to demonstrate the importance of the inhomogeneous state of domain of these phases in formation of properties of these substances, in the search for new piezoelectric ceramic materials, as well as development of new functional materials. An analysis of physical phenomena and peculiarities of behavior of these materials caused by the presence of domains of the coexisting ferroelectric and antiferroelectric phases is presented. Several specific effects caused by this coexistence of phases which are important and significant for applications of these materials in devices are discussed.
  Article Metrics


1. Ye ZG (2008) Handbook of Advanced Dielectric, Piezoelectric and Ferroelectric Materials: Synthesis, Properties and Applications, Elsevier.

2. Uchino K (2017) Advanced piezoelectric materials. Science and Technology, Elsevier.

3. Yang J (2006) Analysis of Piezoelectric Devices, World Scientific.

4. Wu CC, Lee CC, Cao GZ, et al. (2006) Effects of corner frequency on bandwidth and resonance amplitude in designing PZT thin-film actuators. Sensor Actuat A-Phys 125: 178–185.    

5. Bastie P, Bornarel J, Dolino G, et al. (1980) Optical observations of coexistence states during 1st order transition in KD2PO4, quartz and NH4C1. Ferroelectrics 26: 789–792.    

6. Korzhenevskiy AL (1984) Regular large-scale superstructures near phase transitions in crystals. Sov Phys Sol State 26: 744–749.

7. Ishchuk VM (1997) Peculiarities of ferro–antiferro–electric phase transitions. 3. Phenomenological approach to the problem of FE- and AFE-phases coexistence. Nonuniform state. Ferroelectrics 198: 99–113.    

8. Levanyuk AP, Sannikov DG (1969) Anomalies in dielectric properties in phase transitions. Sov Phys JETP 28: 134–139.

9. Gufan YUM, Larin ES (1980) On the theory of phase transitions with two order parameters. Sov Phys Sol State 22: 270–275.

10. Benguigui L (1968) Changement de phases ferroélectriques–antiferroélectriques par l'action d'un champ électrique. Applications aux solutions solides à base de PbZrO3. Can J Phys 46: 1627–1636.

11. Ishchuk VM, Zavadskii EA, Presnyakova OV (1984) Phases coexisting and diffusive phase transitions in lead–lanthanum zirconate–titanate. Sov Phys Sol State 26: 724–727.

12. Ishchuk VM, Presnyakova OV (1985) Investigation of PZT solid solutions doped by lanthanum by TEM method. Bull Acad Sci USSR Inorg Mater 21: 1199–1203 (in Russian).

13. Ishchuk VM, Sobolev VL (2016) Local decomposition of solid solutions, nanostructures and optical materials with negative refractive index. Mod Phys Lett B 30: 1650088.    

14. Randal C, Barber D, Whatmore R, et al. (1987) A microstructural study of the α and β phases in 8.2/70/30 PLZT. Ferroelectrics 76: 311–318.    

15. Akbas MA, Reaney IM, Lee WE (1996) Domain structure–property relations in lead lanthanum zirconate titanate ceramics. J Mater Res 11: 2293–2301.    

16. Zhirnov VA (1959) A contribution to the theory of domain wall in ferroelectrics. Sov Phys JETP 35: 822–825.

17. Lines ME, Glass AM (1977) Principles and Application of Ferroelectrics and Relate Materials, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

18. Ishchuk VM, Samoilenko ZA, Sobolev VL (2006) The kinetics of the local compositional changes at the ferroelectric–antiferroelectric interphase boundaries in lead–lanthanum titanate–zirconate solid solutions. J Phys-Condens Mat 18: 11371–11384.    

19. Ishchuk VM, Samoilenko ZA, Sobolev VL (2008) Peculiarities of ferro–antiferroelectric phase transitions. 8. Processes of long-time relaxation. Ferroelectrics 377: 36–54.    

20. Ishchuk VM, Samoilenko ZA, Sobolev VL (2004) Nanostructures and long-time relaxation caused by decomposition at FE–AFE interphase boundaries. Ferroelectrics 298: 123–128.    

21. Ishchuk VM, Ivashkova NI, Lakin EE, et al. (1993) Phase diagram of the system of solid solutions Pb1−X(Li½La½)X(Zr1−YTiY)O3 in the vicinity of the FE–AFE phase stability boundary. II. Phase transitions and induced states. Phase Transit 47: 105–112.    

22. Ishchuk VM, Ivashkova NI, Matveev SV, et al. (1995) Phase diagrams of the system of solid solutions Pb1−x(Li1/2La1/2)x(Zr1−yTy)O3 in the vicinity of FE–AFE phase stability boundary 3. Effects caused by the coexistence of FE and AFE phases. Phase Transit 53: 23–37.    

23. Ishchuk VM, Sobolev VL (2015) Physical effects in the vicinity of the ferroelectric–antiferroelectric interface. J Surface Interface Mater 3: 1–35.    

24. Pashchenko VP, Samoilenko ZA, Ishchuk VM, et al. (1998) Peculiarities of cluster structure of Pb(LiLa)(ZrTi)O3 in ferroelectric–antiferroelectric transition region. J Thechn Phys 68: 43–47 (in Russian).

25. Shalaev VM, Cai WS, Chettiar UK, et al. (2005) Negative index of refraction in optical metamaterials. Opt Lett 30: 3356–3358.    

26. Zhang S, Fan WJ, Panoiu NC, et al. (2005) Experimental demonstration of near-infrared negative-index metamaterials. Phys Rev Lett 95: 137404.    

27. Zhang S, Fan WJ, Malloy KJ, et al. (2006) Demonstration of metal-dielectric negative-index metamaterials with improved performance at optical frequencies. J Opt Soc Am B 23: 434–438.    

28. Ishchuk VM, Matveev SV (1995) Peculiarities of ferro–antiferroelectric phase transitions. 2. Effects caused by dipole-ordered phases coexistence. Ferroelectrics 163: 89–101.    

29. Vasilevskaja AS, Grodnenskiy IM, Sonin AS (1977) Controlled light scattering in transparent ferroelectric ceramics. Sov Phys Sol State 19: 460–468.

30. Ishchuk VM (1998) Peculiarities of ferro–antiferroelectric phase transitions. 4. Intermediate states in ferro- and antiferroelectrics. Ferroelectrics 209: 569–588.    

31. Bar'yakhtar VG, Bogdanov AN, Yablonskiy DA (1998) The physics of magnetic domains. Sov Phys Usp 31: 810–835.

32. Bar'yakhtar VG, Borovik AE, Popov VA (1972) Theory of the intermediate state of antiferromagnets. Sov Phys JETP 35: 1169–1173.

33. Ishchuk VM, Sobolev VL, Spiridonov NA (2008) Phase transition via intermediate state and control of piezoelectric parameters. Ferroelectrics 362: 64–71.    

34. Carl K, Geisen K (1973) Dielectric and optical properties of a quasi-ferroelectric PLZT ceramic. P IEEE 61: 967–974.    

35. Ishchuk VM, Sobolev VL (2007) Electric field dependence of piezoelectric properties of lanthanum-modified lead–zirconate–titanate solid solutions at the phase transition via intermediate state. J Appl Phys 101: 124103.    

36. Ishchuk VM (2001) Was it necessary to introduce the notion“relaxor ferroelectrics”?—the problem of phase transitions in (Pb,Li½La½)(Zr,Ti)O3, (Pb,La)(Zr,Ti)O3, Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3, Pb(InNb½)O3. and related materials. 1. Model conceptions. Ferroelectrics    

37.Ishchuk VM (2001) Peculiarities of ferro–antifer–roelectric phase transitions. 7. Two-phase (FE + AFE) nucleation and problem of diffusive paraelectric phase transitions. Ferroelectrics 256: 129–150.    

38. Ishchuk VM, Sobolev VL (2002) Investigation of two-phase nucleation in paraelectric phase of ferroelectrics with ferroelectric–antiferroelectric–paraelectric triple point. J Appl Phys 92: 2086–2093.    

39. Noheda B, Cox DE, Shirane G, et al. (1999) A monoclinic ferroelectric phase in the Pb(Zr1−xTix)O3 solid solution. Appl Phys Lett 74: 2059–2061.    

40. Noheda B, GonzaloJA, Cross LE, et al. (2000) Tetragonal-to-monoclinic phase transition in a ferroelectric perovskite: The structure of PbZr0.52Ti0.48O3. Phys Rev B 61: 8687–8695.    

41. Noheda B, Cox DE, Shirane G, et al. (2000) Stability of the monoclinic phase in the ferroelectric perovskite Pb(Zr1−xTix)O3. Phys Rev B 63: 014103.    

42. Pandey D, Singh AK, Baik S (2008) Stability of ferroic phases in the highly piezoelectric Pb(ZrxTi1−x)O3 ceramics. Acta Crystallogr A 64: 192–203.    

43. Ibrahim ABMA, Murgan R, Rahman MKA, et al. (2011) Morphotropic Phase Boundary in Ferroelectric Materials, In: Lallart M, Ferroelectrics—Physical Effects, IntechOpen.

44. Heitmann AA, Rossetti GA (2014) Thermodynamics of ferroelectric solid solutions with morphotropic phase boundaries. J Am Ceram Soc 97: 1661.    

45. Cordero F (2015) Elastic properties and enhanced piezoelectric response at morphotropic phase boundaries. Materials 8: 8195–8245.    

46. Ishchuk VM, Kuzenko DV, Sobolev VL (2017) Effects caused by antiferroelectric nanodomains in PZT-based coarse-grained ceramics with compositions from the morphotropic boundary region. J Adv Dielect 7: 1750005.    

© 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved