Environmental assessment of supplementary cementitious materials and engineered nanomaterials concrete

Nicola Lovecchio; Faiz Shaikh; Michele Rosano; Rosario Ceravolo; Wahidul Biswas

doi:10.3934/environsci.2020002

AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(1): 13-30. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020002. Research article Special Issues

Export file:

Format

RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
BibTex
Text

Content

Citation Only
Citation and Abstract

Environmental assessment of supplementary cementitious materials and engineered nanomaterials concrete

Nicola Lovecchio, Faiz Shaikh, Michele Rosano, Rosario Ceravolo, Wahidul Biswas

1 Department of Structural, Geotechnical and Building Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129 Torino, Italy
2 Department of Civil Engineering, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Australia
3 Sustainable Engineering Group, Curtin University, Kent Street, Bentley, Australia

Received: , Accepted: , Published:

Special Issues: Green built environment

Abstract Full Text(HTML) Figure/Table Related pages

Concrete has been one of the most common building materials used in construction in the world for many centuries. The manufacturing of concrete plays an important role in the generation of global warming emissions and waste and causes non-renewable resource depletion. This research assesses the environmental impacts of the use of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) and engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) (i.e., by-products) as partial replacement of ordinary Portland cement in concrete. It also evaluates the structural performance of the use of construction and demolition waste as partial replacement of natural aggregate in concrete in terms of compressive strength and durability. Results show that the use of SCMs and ENMs reduces the global warming impact (GWI) and the cumulative energy demand (CED) of concrete production without reducing strength and durability. In some cases, it enhances durability and strength. However, there is a tradeoff between durability and strength improvement with the use of reengineered by-products resulting in increased GWI and CED. Although they produce almost the same GWI and CED as those of OPC concrete, improving the use of recycled aggregates as a partial natural aggregate replacement can reduce the use of virgin materials.

Figure/Table

Supplementary

Article Metrics

Keywords: supplementary cementitious materials; engineered nanomaterials; recycled aggregate; building materials; LCA; embodied energy

Citation: Nicola Lovecchio, Faiz Shaikh, Michele Rosano, Rosario Ceravolo, Wahidul Biswas. Environmental assessment of supplementary cementitious materials and engineered nanomaterials concrete. AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(1): 13-30. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020002

References:

1. Malhotra VM, Mehta PK (2005) High-performance, high-volume fly ash concrete: Materials, mixture proportions, properties, construction practice, and case histories. Supplementary Cementing Materials for Sustainable Development Inc., Ottawa, ON, Canada.
2. Fry M (2013) Cement, carbon dioxide, and the 'necessity' narrative: A case study of Mexico. Geoforum 49: 127-138.
3. Lawania KK, Biswas WK (2016) Achieving environmentally friendly building envelope for Western Australia's housing sector: A life cycle assessment approach. Int J Sustain Built Environ 5: 210-224.
4. Malhotra VM (2002) Introduction: sustainable development and concrete technology. Concr Int 24: 22.
5. Limbachiya M, Bostanci SC, Kew H (2004) Suitability of BS EN 197-1 CEM II and CEM V cement for production of low carbon concrete. Comput Chem Eng 71: 397-405.
6. Gartner E (2004) Industrially interesting approaches to 'low-CO2' cements. Cem Concr Res 34: 1489-1498.
7. Ogbeide SO (2010) Developing an optimization model for CO 2 reduction in cement production process. J Eng Sci Technol Rev 3: 85-88.
8. Malvar LJ, Lenke LR (2006) Efficiency of fly ash in mitigating alkali-silica reaction based on chemical composition. ACI Mater J 103: 319-326.
9. Lye CQ, Dhir RK, Ghataora GS (2015) Carbonation resistance of fly ash concrete. Mag Concret Res 67: 1150-1178.
10 Jee AA, Pradhan B (2019) Durability of Fly Ash Added Reinforced Concrete in Chloride and Composite Chloride--Sulfate Environment. Rec Adv Struct Eng 1: 773-785.
11. Chandra S, Bendapudi K (2015) Contribution of Fly ash to the properties of Mortar and Concrete. Int J Earth Sci Eng 4: 1017-1023.
12. Ali Bashah AS (2006) Effect of silica fume to the strength and permeability of high performance ground granulated blastfurnace slag concrete, hesis (Master of Engineering (Civil-Structure))-Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
13. Murali G, Vasanth R, Balasubramaniam AM, et al. (2012) Experimental study on compressive strength of high volume fly-ash concrete. Int J Eng Dev 4: 187-185.
14. Xu GQ, Liu JH, Qiao L, et al. (2010) Experimental study on carbonation and steel corrosion of high volume fly ash concrete. in Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference, APPEEC, 28-31 Mar 2010. Chengdu, China.
15. Carette G, Malhotra VM (1983) Early-age strength development of concrete incorporating fly ash and condensed silica fume. Spec Publ 79: 765-784.
16. Amudhavalli NK, Mathew J (2012) Effect of silica fume on strength and durability parameters of concrete. Int J Eng Sci Emerg Technol 3: 28-35.
17. Wang D, Zhou X, Meng Y, et al. (2017) Durability of concrete containing fly ash and silica fume against combined freezing-thawing and sulfate attack. Constr Build Mater 147: 398-406.
18. Thomas MDA, Bamforth PB (2002) Modelling chloride diffusion in concrete. Cem Concr Res 29: 487-495.
19. Rashad AM (2014) A comprehensive overview about the effect of nano-SiO2 on some properties of traditional cementitious materials and alkali-activated fly ash. Constr Build Mater 52: 437-464.
20. Rattan A, Sachdeva P, Chaudhary A (2016) Use of Nanomaterials in Concrete. Int J Latest Res Eng Technol 2: 81-84.
21. Liu R, Xiao H, Liu J, et al. (2019) Improving the microstructure of ITZ and reducing the permeability of concrete with various water/cement ratios using nano-silica. J Mater Sci 54: 444-456.
22. Sanchez F, Sobolev K (2010) Nanotechnology in concrete-A review Construction and Building Materials 24: 2060-2071.
23. Rezania M, Panahandeh M, Razavi SMJ, et al. (2019) Experimental study of the simultaneous effect of nano-silica and nano-carbon black on permeability and mechanical properties of the concrete. Theor Appl Fract Mech 104: 1-10.
24. Camiletti J, Soliman AM, Nehdi ML (2013) Effects of nano- and micro-limestone addition on early-age properties of ultra-high-performance concrete. Mater Struct Constr 46: 881-898.
25. Kawashima S, Hou P, Corr DJ, et al. (2013) Modification of cement-based materials with nanoparticles. Cement Concrete Composites 36: 8-15.
26. Kandie BKT, Pilakoutas K (2016) Potentials of Ultra-Fine Fly Ash Concrete, in Young Researchers' Forum III 2016 Innovation in Construction Materials, 2016 Imperial College, London.
27. Obla KH, Hill RL, Thomas MDA, et al. (2003) Properties of Concrete Containing Ultra-Fine Fly Ash. ACI Mater J 100: 426-433.
28. Shaikh FUA, Supit SWM (2015) Compressive strength and durability properties of high volume fly ash (HVFA) concretes containing ultrafine fly ash (UFFA). Constr Build Mater 82: 192-205.
29. Taylor M, Tam C, Gielen D (2006) Energy efficiency and CO2 emissions from the global cement industry. Korea 50: 61-67.
30. Jones MR, McCarthy A, Booth APPG (2006) Characteristics of the ultrafine component of fly ash. Fuel 85: 2250-2259.
31. Sinsiri T, Teeramit P, Jaturapitakkul C, et al. (2006) Effect of finenesses of fly ash on expansion of mortars in magnesium sulfate. ScienceAsia 32: 63-69.
32. Hossain AB, Islam S (2007) Influence of Ultrafine Fly Ash on the Shrinkage and Cracking Tendency of Concrete and the Implications for Bridge Decks. Transportation Research Board 86th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, United States.
33. Choi SJ, Lee SS, Monteiro PJM (2011) Effect of Fly Ash Fineness on Temperature Rise, Setting, and Strength Development of Mortar. J Mater Civ Eng 24: 499-505.
34. Shaikh FUA (2017) Mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete containing ternary blended cementitious materials. Int J Sustain Built Environ 6: 536-543.
35. Shaikh F, Kerai S, Kerai S (2016) Effect of micro-silica on mechanical and durability properties of high volume fly ash recycled aggregate concretes (HVFA-RAC). Adv Concr Constr 3: 317-331.
36. Alnahhal MF, Alengaram UJ, Jumaat MJ, et al. (2018) Assessment on engineering properties and CO2 emissions of recycled aggregate concrete incorporating waste products as supplements to Portland cement. J Clean Prod 203: 822-835.
37. Somna R, Jaturapitakkul C, Chalee W, et al. (2011) Effect of the water to binder ratio and ground fly ash on properties of recycled aggregate concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 24: 16-22.
38. Royal Society (2004) Nanoscience and nanotechnologies. Science Policy Section, The Royal Society, 6-9 Carlton House Terrace, London SW1Y 5AG.
39. Elder A, Lynch I, Grieger K, et al. (2009) Human health risks of engineered nanomaterials. Nanomaterials: risks and benefits. Springer, Dordrecht, 3-29
40. Lawania KK, Biswas WK (2016) Cost-effective GHG mitigation strategies for Western Australia's housing sector: a life cycle management approach. Clean Technol Environ Policy 18: 2419-2428.
41. Frischknecht R, Heijungs R, De Pelsmacker P (1998) Einstein's lessons for energy accounting in LCA 1. J Life Cycle Assess 1: 266-272.
42. Wiedmann T, Minx J (2008) Definition of 'Carbon Footprint'. Ecol Econ Res Trends, 1-11.
43. Supit SWM, Shaikh FUA (2015) Durability properties of high volume fly ash concrete containing nano-silica. Mater Struct Constr 48: 2431-2445.
44. Shaikh FUA, Supit SWM (2014) Mechanical and durability properties of high volume fly ash (HVFA) concrete containing calcium carbonate (CaCO₃) nanoparticles. Constr Build Mater 70: 309-321.
45. Biswas WK, Alhorr Y, Lawania KK, et al. (2017) Life cycle assessment for environmental product declaration of concrete in the Gulf States. Sustain Cities Soc 35: 36-46.
46. Nath P, Sarker PK, Biswas WK (2018) Effect of fly ash on the service life, carbon footprint and embodied energy of high strength concrete in the marine environment. Energy Build 158: 1694-1702.
47. Pré Consultants (2017) SimaPro database. Pré Consultants, The Netherlands.
48. Life Cycle Strategies Pty Ltd. (2015) Australasian Unit Process LCI Library and Methods. Version 2015_02_06, http://www.lifecycles.com.au/#!australasian-database/cbm5. Accessed 30 Jun 2015.
49. Hans-Jorg A (2010). Ecoinvent unit processes for Simapro. Life cycle ass model group: Dübendorf, Switzerland.

show all references

Reader Comments

your name: * your email: *

Download full text in PDF

Associated material

Metrics