Citation: Carlos Garcia, Teresa Hernandez, Maria D Coll, Sara Ondoño. Organic amendments for soil restoration in arid and semiarid areas: a review[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(5): 640-676. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.5.640
[1] | Voke O. Urhibo, Bernard O. Ejechi . Crude oil degradation potential of bacteria isolated from oil-polluted soil and animal wastes in soil amended with animal wastes. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(2): 277-286. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.2.277 |
[2] | Jerry R. Miller, John P. Gannon, Kyle Corcoran . Concentrations, mobility, and potential ecological risks of selected metals within compost amended, reclaimed coal mine soils, tropical South Sumatra, Indonesia. AIMS Environmental Science, 2019, 6(4): 298-325. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2019.4.298 |
[3] | Katie Lewis, Jamie Foster, Frank Hons, Thomas Boutton . Initial aggregate formation and soil carbon storage from lipid-extracted algae amendment. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(6): 743-762. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.6.743 |
[4] | Katharina Meixner, Mona Kubiczek, Ines Fritz . Microplastic in soil–current status in Europe with special focus on method tests with Austrian samples. AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(2): 174-191. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020011 |
[5] | Steven D. Warren, Larry L. St. Clair . Atmospheric transport and mixing of biological soil crust microorganisms. AIMS Environmental Science, 2021, 8(5): 498-516. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2021032 |
[6] | Maja Radziemska, Agnieszka Bęś, Zygmunt M. Gusiatin, Jerzy Jeznach, Zbigniew Mazur, Martin Brtnický . Novel combined amendments for sustainable remediation of the Pb-contaminated soil. AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(1): 1-12. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020001 |
[7] | Tahseen Sayara, Ruba Hanoun, Yamen Hamdan . Survey on the factors and social perspectives to participate in home composting schemes in Palestine: Anabta case study. AIMS Environmental Science, 2022, 9(3): 232-243. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2022016 |
[8] | Adam O'Keeffe, Erin Brooks, Chad Dunkel, Dev S. Shrestha . Soil moisture routing modeling of targeted biochar amendment in undulating topographies: an analysis of biochar's effects on streamflow. AIMS Environmental Science, 2023, 10(4): 529-546. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2023030 |
[9] | M.A. Rahim, M.G. Mostafa . Impact of sugar mills effluent on environment around mills area. AIMS Environmental Science, 2021, 8(1): 86-99. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2021006 |
[10] | Joseph A. Kazery, Dayakar P. Nittala, H. Anwar Ahmad . Meteorological effects on trace element solubility in Mississippi coastal wetlands. AIMS Environmental Science, 2019, 6(1): 1-13. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2019.1.1 |
Soil is a natural resource that provides ecosystem services critical for life. Soil provides the medium for plant growth, is the habitat for billions of organisms, contributing to biodiversity, act as a filtration system for surface water, and helps regulate atmospheric carbon dioxide by acting as a carbon store. Soil is the foundation for our cities and towns and it is the basis of our agrosystems that provide us with fibre, feed, food and fuel. Summarizing, soil is necessary for the sustainability of humankind, this explaining the necessity of its protection and conservation.
Mol and Keesstra [1], in a recent publication, highlighted the necessity of a greater communication between soils scientific as well as between soil scientific, the society and governments in order to solve soil related problems such as food security, water resources, biodiversity, and climate change. These authors also indicated that the link between soil research and knowledge, and effective human action depends to a large degree on the right political and administrative interventions. In this sense, the United Nations have proposed several goals to achieve ecosystem sustainability, highlighting how the soils are relevant to achieve these goals [2].
Soil degradation is a serious problem, particularly in arid and semiarid areas, characterised by low and erratic rainfall, periodic droughts and different associations of vegetative cover and soils [3]. In these areas both, human-induced actions and natural conditions contribute to the loss of soil organic matter (SOM), which is strongly linked to soil degradation and desertification, and causes a decline in agronomical productivity and the failure of soil ecosystem services [4]. Arid and semiarid ecosystems have little vegetation and hence lower carbon accumulation than other ecosystems; however, they are estimated to contain 20% of the global soil C pool (organic plus inorganic) in continental areas [5]. Lal et al. [6] concluded that the predicted amounts of carbon in drylands are between 159 and 191 billion tons, with a density of 35 to 42 tons C ha–1. Since carbon in arid and semiarid climates has been depleted for both "natural" and "anthropogenic" reasons, these soils still have the capacity for carbon sequestration, which can increase soil quality, ensure food security and mitigate global climate change [7].
One important characteristic of the soils of the arid and semiarid regions is that they have a low organic matter content and that they are submitted to erosion and desertification processes [3]. The loss of organic matter and the degradation of soil structure are closely related with the loss of its agricultural potential and with an increasing risk of erosion. This can imply a diminution or destruction of the soil's biological potential, leading in extreme conditions to desertification [3,7].
Intensive cultivation, continual ploughing and forest fires, allied to years of unsuitable agricultural practices, have had a detrimental effect on humification processes and on properties associated with degradation. All the above has led to a great diminution in the quantity of vegetal remains returned to the soil, while the humus is undergoing a process of accelerated mineralisation as a result of tilling. The inevitable result is a progressive diminution of the soil's organic matter content and the entailed negative consequences. These activities can have a negative impact on the soil, preventing it from performing its broad range of functions and services benefitting humans and ecosystems. Soil degradation results in a loss of soil fertility, carbon and biodiversity; a lower water-holding capacity; disruption of the gas and nutrient cycles; and reduced degradation of contaminants [8]. Moreover, since the adoption of the 2002 Communication on soil protection [9], an effort has been made to ensure that recent environmental policy initiatives in the EU concerning waste, water, air, climate change, chemicals, flooding, biodiversity and environmental liability also contribute to soil protection. In particular, the Environmental Liability Directive [10] created a coherent framework of liability to be applied across the EU in situations where land contamination has resulted in a significant risk to human health.
The close relationship between a soil's organic matter content and its fertility is widely accepted. The organic matter improves soil aggregate stability and structure and increases its porosity and water holding capacity, thus favouring gas and water exchange and the exploratory capacity of plant roots. The cationic exchange capacity is increased which favours nutrient fixation, maintaining them longer at the plant disposition and increases the development of its microbial flora [11].
One way of improving the fertility of degraded soils and particularly of improving its microbial activity, is to add "young" exogenous organic matter. By this term we mean that the amendment must contribute to provide labile organic matter in sufficient quantity to stimulate the life of the microorganisms that might exist in the soil. To this purpose, organic amendments are appropriate source of organic matter. The characteristics of these products determine that they have a good behaviour in the soil from a physical point of view (increase soil sponginess), they contribute to improve the nutritional quality of the soil and, most importantly, their labile organic fraction acts as a catalyst for the microorganisms, improving in this way the potential soil fertility and the biogeochemical cycles of the most important elements.
Soil organic matter plays a key role in the development and functioning of terrestrial ecosystems, so both the quality and the quantity of SOM are quite important. SOM quality is related to the process involved in its formation (humification) and the material from which it comes. Regarding quantity, the amount of SOM in the soil should be nearly constant, a balance between input from either animal or plant debris (part of this fraction goes to humification) and organic matter losses, producing H2O and CO2 (the mineralisation process) [11]. When the equilibrium between these two complex processes (humification and mineralisation) is broken by some action that harm the soil, a negative loss of organic matter takes place, which leads to decreases in soil fertility and productivity. Owing to the close relationship between soil organic matter content and soil fertility, it is fundamental to maintain an adequate level of organic matter in soils. To accomplish this, it is essential to search for new sources of organic matter to restore the SOM lost due to inadequate land management practices.
Lal [12] indicated that the pool of organic matter in soils worldwide has decreased 25–75%, depending on climatic conditions, soil type and soil management practices. Such decreases in the soil C pool lead to a decline in production capacity and the ability of the soil to sequester CO2 from the atmosphere through the biochemical cycles. Lal [7] has proposed some measures to promote C fixation in the soil so that soils can be used as C sinks, counteracting the effects of global warming. These measures include: (1) the restoration of degraded soils; (2) the development of sustainable agriculture; (3) the use of suitable plant species adapted to the environmental conditions of specific sites; and (4) good management of cover crops. There are three main mechanisms for the stabilisation of organic C in soils. The first is biochemical stabilisation, which is due to the chemical composition of the C pool in a given soil and is closely related to microbial activity. The second mechanism is physical stabilisation. When aggregates of organic matter are formed, a protective system is created, hindering biological degradation. Finally, the third mechanism is chemical stabilisation, which occurs through molecular interactions between organic C and mineral colloids (mainly clay and lime). Aggregates protect SOM from microbial attack (mineralisation process) and thus increase the average residence time of C in the soil [13]. According to Kalbitz et al. [14], the organic C associated with fine soil fractions (silt and clay) stays longer in the soil than the C associated with greater size soil particles. Six and Jastrow [15] and Pulleman and Marinissen [16] agree that soil aggregates are able to protect soil organic C and that the oldest organic C fractions are located in soil micro-aggregates. Organic matter affects soil characteristics, but the organic matter present in aggregates plays the greatest role in soil functionality.
Among all the different types of generated wastes, biological organic wastes represent one of the most environmentally significant since they are continuously and globally produced. The moment the environment waste absorption capacity is surpassed, the problem of contamination arises, which may have serious economic consequences. It seems clear then, that society must turn its immediate attention to the problems that wastes provoke and offer suitable solutions. Attempts must be made to give them a value so that they represent as low an economic burden as possible while minimising negative environmental effects and guaranteeing sustainability. As the main alternative for the above-mentioned wastes we propose their recycling in the soil, which will achieve a double aim: on the one hand, a good use is made of an organic waste (assuming of course the proper and orderly control of the process) than otherwise will create environmental problems, and on the other hand, their rational use will contribute to prevent soil degradation and desertification in those places where the organic matter is deficient, thus improving soil quality [11].
In this respect, based on present day scientific knowledge, the recycling of organic amendments in soils have a benefit (added value) by: (1) recovering soils that are degraded through anthropic activities or natural disasters, particularly in arid and semiarid zones where soil degradation processes are very strong; (2) evaluating the effectiveness of organic wastes in sequestering C, contributing to mitigate the greenhouse effect; (3) obtaining organic amendments and improving the biodiversity of the soil to which they are added. This is fundamental to combat processes of soil degradation and to promote soil fertility recovery; (4) using organic amendments as "support" for the decontamination of contaminated soils, and for rehabilitating saline soils.
In natural soils, there is a balance between the C provided by the existing vegetation (inputs) and the natural mineralization produced by the microbial activity in the soil [17,18]. In arid and semiarid zones, there is minimal vegetation due to climate conditions and the resulting scarcity of water and thus, insufficient C inputs [11]. In such environments, agricultural productivity and fertility are compromised by the fact that the soil is poor in organic matter [19,21]. The use of organic amendments as a source of exogenous organic matter could be an adequate strategy for maintaining soil fertility in such degraded soils [11]. All the processes described above are clearly detailed in Figure 1.
Agricultural systems in arid and semiarid zones consume a large quantity of agrochemicals in order to maintain soil fertility and productivity. In addition to this, climate change, soil overexploitation and soil contamination (salinization, etc.) can seriously impair soil productivity and fertility, resulting in the abandonment of such soils [22,23]. In turn, abandonment can lead to processes of degradation and desertification, since vegetation rarely takes root in such conditions, resulting in minimal C input.
In agricultural systems, both organic fertilizers and organic amendments of different origins have been proposed for improving and alleviating the scarcity of organic matter in such soils. Although agricultural systems are not the main subject of this review, we will consider certain relevant aspects of the field. Climate change poses an important challenge for food production, and global warming and the lack of water have endangered agricultural systems, especially in semiarid climates. According to Komatsuzaki and Ohta [24], there is clear evidence that continuous cropping and inadequate replacement of nutrients in the soil, which are removed along with harvested materials or lost through erosion, leaching and gaseous emissions, are degrading soil physical, chemical and biological properties, intensifying global warming. In this situation, agriculture must meet the goal of ensuring productivity by effectively adapting to changing climatic conditions while at the same time mitigating their harmful consequences; in other words, agriculture has to be more resilient [25]. To achieve the goal of a better agriculture, the quality of the soil used for agricultural purposes must be preserved or enhanced through new sources of fertilisation [26]. In accordance with Lal [7] and Diacono and Montemurro [27], agricultural management practices that enhance SOM content can preserve both, farming output and environmental quality. Such practices are considered sustainable activities and should be encouraged in agricultural soils. An interesting alternative to traditional mineral fertilisation for improving soil quality is the application of organic wastes, such as by-products from farming or municipal activities, including animal manures, food processing wastes and municipal biosolids [27]. The application of organic wastes has been widely shown to be an adequate strategy for increasing the level of organic matter in soils, with benefits for the development of soil microorganisms and plants [28,29].
By way of example, Antolin et al. [30] evaluated the effects of sewage sludge on the growth and yield of barley under semiarid Mediterranean conditions for a period of four years. Barley grain yield increased significantly under repeated sewage sludge application. Moreover, sewage sludge addition improved soil microbiological properties and increased protein concentration in barley leaves as well as the dry matter yield. The results further indicated that under Mediterranean climatic conditions it was possible to maintain crop production by the continuous annual addition of sewage sludge at low dose (15 t/ha). However, they also detected significant increases in the concentration of heavy metals in barley grain which suggests that care should be taken in long-term application of sewage sludges. In similar experiments, increases in soil fertility were observed with the application of the following organic amendments: sludges, pre-treated wastewater, manure, compost and industrial effluents. In these studies, researchers found that the application of these organic amendments enhanced extractable phosphorous and organic C content and resulted in deferred N availability, indicating an increase in nutrient content and soil fertility [27,31,32].
Sustainable practices with the addition of organic amendments (soil management) could be a useful tool for maintaining and even increasing the organic matter content in agricultural soils, thus preserving and improving soil fertility [33,34]. There is a clear need for sustainable systems, because intensive agriculture practices in soils already poor in nutrients have further reduced soil quality and fertility, resulting in land abandonment and soil degradation [21,35]. Many agricultural soils are very susceptible to environmental degradation and are thus unsuitable for crop production. This is particularly true in the Mediterranean region, which has large areas of low quality degraded soils with little plant cover and organic matter content. Furthermore, the traditional sources of organic matter (peat and manure) are scarce in extensive areas of Europe, particularly in southern Europe. To counteract this situation, the organic matter contained in organic wastes, sewage sludges, animal manures and other organic residues has begun to be used as a source of SOM. The goal of using such organic matter is twofold since it not only improves the quality and fertility of degraded soils but also simultaneously eliminates organic waste in a rational and environmentally friendly manner [21].
In semiarid areas of southern Ningxia (China), Zhang et al. [36] investigated the effects of different rates of straw incorporation on soil aggregates. The results showed that straw addition increased the water-stable macroaggregate level and stability as well as the storage of organic C compared to the non-amended soil. In general, organic wastes improve soil physical characteristics, promote a good soil structure and improve aeration and water holding capacity [37,38]. Organic wastes also represent an important source of nutrients for plants and microorganisms and thus improve crop production [39,40]. The beneficial effect of adding organic amendments on crop yield and quality has been widely reported [41,42], and can be explained by the significant role played by organic matter in soil aggregation and other soil physical (water holding capacity, infiltration capacity, porosity etc., ) and microbiological properties, as well as to the capacity of organic amendments of slowly releasing nutrients [18,43,44,45]. Compared with inorganic fertilisers, organic fertilisers have the advantage of continuing to improve the soil long after the plants have taken the nutrients they need [41]. The use of organic fertilisers in place of inorganic fertilisers could reduce the emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. It is important to keep in mind that the organic matter contained in organic fertilisers must be mineralised by soil microorganisms to release nutrients into the soil. This is a slow process depending on the organic waste characteristics and the type of soil and environment (soil water content, temperature) [46].
Several researchers [47] have indicated lower production levels under organic cultivation than under conventional cultivation. Hernández et al. [21] showed that a combination of compost and inorganic fertiliser produced higher yields and better fruit quality than the respective inorganic treatment when used alone. In addition, the soils treated with combined fertilisation showed higher values of microbial biomass C, basal respiration and dehydrogenase activity than the soils subjected to the respective inorganic treatment.
Annually, the global rate of erosion is about 75 billion Mg, and in severely eroded soils, the figure reaches 100 Mg ha–1 [48]. Erosion is especially problematic in semiarid areas, where the SOM content is often lower that 1–2%, making it necessary to increase this content by the addition of external sources of organic matter.
There is a wide variety of exploitable organic matter sources (urban, agricultural or animal origin) that can be used to correct the lack of organic matter in soils, especially in semiarid areas. Taking into account the huge amount of organic residue generated worldwide by human and industrial activities, this is a valid option to consider in restoration strategies. Municipal waste materials are often incinerated or taken to landfills, but they could be recycled by amending eroded and degraded soils [49,50]. As an example, sewage sludges (i.e., biosolids) are generated in large amounts in wastewater treatment plants, and their high nutrient content [51] makes them good candidates to be used as soil amendments. Indeed, biosolids have been land-applied to increase the organic matter and nutrient content of soils and to stimulate soil microbial communities [52]. However, domestic waste composition and treatment differ depending of the country; domestic organic wastes can be source-separately collected or mechanically treated to obtain its organic fraction; also, wastewaters can be treated by aerobic or anaerobic digestion thus producing sewage sludges of different quality as regards their use in agriculture or soil restoration processes.
The most used organic amendments include biosolids, farmyard manure, compost from municipal organic waste, sewage sludges, olive mill waste, pulp sludges, wood waste and by-products from ethanol production processes. Additionally, pulp sludges and wood waste have also been used as slope stabilisers or as bulking and structural agents, respectively. These residues need to be submitted to sanitisation processes, such as composting, vermicomposting, or anaerobic digestion, in order to stabilise their organic matter and to control pathogens [53]. Many municipalities have started composting municipal solid waste (MSW) made-up of kitchen and yard wastes [54], thus diverting organic waste materials from landfills while creating a product suitable for agricultural purposes at a relatively low cost [55]. Biological waste valorisation methods like composting are considered to be promising waste management strategies for stabilising organic waste and are an option for treating sewage sludges and municipal solid wastes [56]. Such processes transform waste organic matter into stable humus-like substances that can be used as organic amendments in agriculture. The composting of dewatered sewage sludges (i.e., biosolids) and other organic wastes has been extensively studied and tested at the field level [56,57]. Municipal solid waste (MSW) compost, for example, has been found to have high water holding capacity because of its significant organic matter content [58]. The incorporation of MSW compost into soil has shown to increase microbiological activity and soil fertility [59] by activating the mineralisation processes of the soil. Studies measuring microbial biomass C and related enzyme activities provide very useful information about the biochemical processes occurring in amended soils. Indeed, there is growing evidence that soil biological parameters are early and sensitive indicators of soil ecological stress and of the feasibility of the restoration process [3,35,60].
Over the years, there has been an increase in the use of organic biofertilisers, or biostimulants, obtained from different organic materials by hydrolysis reactions. These biostimulants, generally comprising peptides, amino acids, polysaccharides, humic acids, phytohormones, etc., are directly absorbed by soil microorganisms and plants, which spend a smaller amount of energy in the absorption process [61]. Biostimulants are added to the soil with the aim of encourage and stimulate plant metabolism and reduce stress [62,63] and it has been reported that they stimulate plant growth and enhance the quality and production of the fruit or grain harvested [62]. Research suggests that the application of biostimulants to degraded soils can quickly improve soil's microbial characteristics favouring the development of plant cover and enabling soil restoration [64].
Soils in semiarid areas have very low microbial activity [65], low levels of microbial biomass and low organic matter content (0.5–2%). In this regard, organic amendments of different nature have been used for degraded soil restoration. As an example, Calleja-Cervantes [26] observed significantly higher organic matter content and total N, P and K contents in soils amended with different organic wastes (such as pelletized organic compost made from plant, animal and sewage sludge residues; a compost made from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste; and a compost made of sheep manure) than in the control soil.
Sewage sludges are commonly used as organic amendments in soil restoration initiatives; they contain macronutrients, which are a good source of plant nutrients, while the sludge organic constituents provide beneficial soil conditioning properties. The application of sewage sludges to the soil makes it possible to recycle nutrients reducing the need for commercial fertilisers on cropland. As a drawback, sewage sludges may also contain harmful toxins such as detergents, various salts and pesticides due to effluents from municipal and industrial premises, and toxic organics and hormone disruptors, whose presence in the treated sludge depends on the sludge origin (urban wastewater or industrial water).
Nowadays, the idea that applying biochar can lead in the long-term to the creation of a sink of C in the soil, thereby mitigating climate change and contributing to the restoration of degraded agricultural soils is gaining adepts [66]. Biochar provides an excellent habitat for beneficial soil microbes [67] that aid in enhancing soil fertility and crop productivity [68] due to greater soil aggregation, protecting both the biochar and SOM from degradation [66]. In addition, biochar has also shown to reduce organic and inorganic contaminant toxicity and increase soil pH. This can have positive effects on the soil microbial community and can reduce exposure to contaminants by slowly releasing nutrients over time [69]. Although biochar is considered to be a potential C-sequestering tool, there are contradictory reports about the beneficial effects of biochar, particularly in terms of ecological needs. Currently, there are insufficient data in the literature to draw conclusions about the application and performance of biochar in different soil conditions, such as hypersaline and sodic soils [70]. Nevertheless, Novak et al. [71] observed that the addition of biochar to a coastal soil at dose of 2% decreased soil acidity and S and Zn contents while increased organic C, Ca, Mn, and P contents enhancing soil fertility. Laird et al. [72] also found that biochar improved the fertility of agricultural soils by reducing nutrient leaching (N and P) and soil acidity and increasing soil water retention and cation exchange capacity. Contrarily, other authors have pointed out that biochar additions do not always have a beneficial effect on agricultural soils and crop production [70]. The main potential features of biochar in the soil include the following: biochar can contain toxic compounds such as heavy metals or PAHs than can be released in the soil; it can produce an increase of soil pH and electrical conductivity, as well as an oversupply of nutrients and the binding and deactivation of agrochemical; biochar can also affect soil biological processes and alter microbial community structure and diversity [70]. Regarding the influence of biochar on soil microbial characteristics, some authors have observed differential patterns in relation to changes in community composition and the diversity of bacterial, fungal and archaeal populations [73,74,75,76], revealing that different microbial groups respond in different ways to biochar additions.
In recent studies, Hernández et al. [21] and Nicolás et al. [77] evaluated the mid-term impact of adding large amounts of an organic amendment on the recovery of the physical, chemical and, particularly, the microbiological properties of a marginal semiarid degraded soil and on increasing the soil organic C pool. A spontaneous vegetal cover developed on the amended soils 3–4 months after the addition of the organic amendments (compost), and the compost-amended soils showed higher concentrations of organic C than the control soil throughout the experimental period. However, compost addition also increased soil electrical conductivity and nitrate concentrations, particularly at the higher dose. Likewise, compost addition produced an increase in soil heavy metal concentrations, although the levels of heavy metal were under the limits allowed in soils in the EU.
Among the different processes leading to soil degradation, erosion is one of the major problems at European level. Thus, 26 million hectares in the EU are affected by water erosion and 1 million hectares by wind erosion. In the Mediterranean area losses of between 20 and 40 Mg ha–1 of soil have been estimated after a storm, and even up to more than 100 Mg ha–1 in extreme events. This erosion, which is initially superficial laminar, if not stopped in time ends up being furrowed, ending in the formation of gullies and ravines.
According to Lal [78], soil erosion affects soil organic carbon dynamics through its impact on: (1) slaking or disruption of aggregates; (2) preferential removal of C in runoff water or dust storms; (3) mineralization of soil organic matter on-site; (4) mineralization of soil organic carbon displaced and redistribution over the landscape and transported in rivers and dust storms; (5) re-aggregation of soil trough formation of organo-mineral complexes at the depositional/protected sites; and (6) deep burial of C-enriched sediment in depositional sites, flood plains and reservoirs and ocean floor.
According to Krull et al. [79], soil erosion processes can negatively affect the different C pool existing in soil, particularly the soluble C pool. Three different C pools with different turnover times could be affected by soil erosion process: (1) the active or labile pool also named "sensitive" [80], consisting of microbial biomass, and plant detritus with a turnover time of about 1–2 years; (2) the intermediate or slow pool with a residence time of about 10–100 years, consisting of recalcitrant organic compounds and physically protected organic matter; (3) the passive pool, consisting of very old material that is physically or biochemically protected, with a turnover time of about > 100 years.
The conversion of natural ecosystems to pasture can lead to high rates of erosion and loss of topsoil, nutrients and carbon. Overgrazing can reduce ground cover, enabling erosion and compaction of the land by wind and rain. This reduces the ability for plants to grow and water to penetrate, which harms soil microbes and results in serious erosion of the land. The loss of fertile soil makes land less productive for agriculture, creates new deserts, pollutes waterways and can alter how water flows through the landscape, potentially making flooding more common. Desertification can be characterized by the droughts and arid conditions the landscape endures as a result of human exploitation of fragile ecosystems. Effects include land degradation, soil erosion and sterility, and a loss of biodiversity, with huge economic costs for nations where deserts are growing.
There are strategies of soil restoration that contribute to avoid soil erosion and C losses. For instance, the promotion of sustainable agriculture practices is fundamental. Farming is the world's largest industry, employing a billion people who produce more than one trillion dollars of food annually. We should promote the use and development of sustainable agriculture that preserves and restores critical habitats, helps protect watersheds and improves the health of soil and water. Also we should work to reduce deforestation that is a factor causing soil erosion [81]. Given the amount of deforestation around the world, zero net deforestation may seem unattainable. However, we should maintain critical ecosystem services and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Some nations are already conducting successfully, like Paraguay that reduced the rate of deforestation by 85% the year after its 2004 zero deforestation law (WWF).
The inherent climate conditions and erosion rates, together with the advent impacts of climate change and the direct agricultural-mediated human impacts might cause a loss of soil organic C that is strongly related to soil degradation in arid and semiarid areas [3]. For this purpose, organic amendments constitute a source of organic matter (exogenous organic C), and it is a good strategy for soil restoration, and to counterbalance the scarce input from plant debris in degraded soils [11,82,83]. In addition, when organic amendments are added to eroded and degraded soils, some initial spontaneous vegetation from some weeds can be generated, which lead to the incorporation of new biomass carbon to the soil Many studies have shown the benefited impacts of organic amendments on soil quality with environmental perspectives [11,28,53,84,85,86,87,88]; in addition, in the case of very badly degraded and eroded arid soils, organic amendments could help to promote the formation of soil crusts as a preliminary stabilization step.
The EU integrated pollution prevention and control (IPPC) [89] strengthened soil protection and contamination prevention on the basic obligation to avoid pollution risk, return IPPC installation sites to a "satisfactory state" and periodically monitor polluted soils. The use of organic amendments to restore degraded areas was emerging to aim with EU proposals. As a result, organic amendments have been used for soil restoration purposes in several areas, including in soils polluted by organic substances, pesticides and mining activities. Among the organic contaminants, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are critical pollutants [90]. PAHs are produced by incomplete combustion and pyrolysis of organic matter and arise in the environment from natural (e.g., forest fires and volcanic eruptions) and anthropogenic (e.g., vehicular emissions, residential wood burning, petroleum catalytic cracking, and industrial combustion of fossil fuel) sources [91,92]. These pollutants are of great concern because of their adverse health effects, such as toxicity, mutagenicity and carcinogenicity. Although PAHs in soil may dissipate via volatilisation, photolysis, plant uptake and soil sorption processes, their major dissipation pathway is microbial degradation, as they can be used as a C source by microorganisms [93,94]. Fungi and bacteria can metabolise hydrocarbons and either complete their mineralisation to carbon dioxide and water or at least transform the pollutants into harmless products. Given the ability of microorganisms to degrade hydrocarbons it is possible to use biological methods (e.g., bioremediation and phytoremediation) to remediate hydrocarbon-contaminated media [95]. In fact, a large number of studies have demonstrated the degradation of PAHs through bioremediation practices [96,97,98,99].
Contamination due to organic compounds has been extensively studied. For instance, Gan et al. [100], reviewed the remediation of soils contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). Soil and water contamination with petroleum-derived hydrocarbons and sludge generated by the petrochemical industry pose drastic environmental problems [101]. However, the addition of organic amendments increases the metabolic activity of soil microflora and contributes to hydrocarbon degradation [102].
Restoration initiatives have also tackled the environmental fate of certain pesticides in the soil. It has been reported that the addition of municipal solid waste compost to soil significantly increases the absorption of pesticides, such as triasulfuron [103], chlorophenol biocides and dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT) after the addition of spent mushroom composts [104]. Other authors have also obtained good results with the addition of farmyard manures [105].
In the field of restoring abandoned mining soils, alternative remediation methods are encouraged by environmental managers to avoid onerous investments in site remediation. Amending impacted soils with organic materials improves soil physicochemical properties (e.g., increasing porosity to air and water), providing an organic substrate (C, N, and P) for the proliferation of soil micro-flora, which is the basis for remediation success, and to promote soil revegetation [106]. Data reported in the literature demonstrate that different types of industrial or municipal wastes can be used to successfully remediate disturbed soils [107,108,109]. Sewage sludges can be used in restoration initiatives for establishing a productive rhizosphere and obtaining an extensive and healthy vegetation cover [108]. Nevertheless, sludges that are not fully stabilised are considered immature and may contain high levels of ammonia and volatile fatty acids. To the contrary, the use of stabilised sludges (composted or anaerobically digested) is highly encouraged for soil restoration purposes, since the humification process during sludge stabilisation helps ensure that metals are less bioavailable and thus less ecotoxic in the resulting sludge [110]. Certain phytoremediation technologies can also be applied to reduce the heavy metal concentration in soils. Such metals are persistent contaminants that cannot be biodegraded, but they can be treated by phytoextraction or phytostabilisation [111].
Heavy metal pollution is an important factor in land degradation. This pollution could come to soils due to the increase of human activities (e.g., mine industries, agriculture use of organic amendments with high charge of heavy metals). On fact, the European Union shows about 250 000 polluted sites [112] where specific strategies for restoration could be adopted. Heavy metal contamination strongly affects the structure and functioning of ecosystems [113].
One important concern is the absorption of heavy metals by crops. Hseu et al. [114] reviewed heavy metal uptaking in different plant varieties and remediation technologies and they concluded that it is necessary to identify the bioavailability of heavy metals in different soil types from specific case studies to provide reliable parameters for health-based risk assessments and to further achieve the goal of food safety and sustainable agriculture. In this sense, Pardo et al. [115] indicated that phytostabilization and organic amendments may reduce the amount of available heavy metals and benefits soil functionality. Soil microbial biomass is greatly sensitive to heavy metal concentration and can be used as indicator of the impacts in the environment [116].
To eliminate or decrease heavy metals in mine soils, phytoremediation techniques as well as the combined use of plant species that accumulate heavy metals, soil amendments, and agronomic practices could be a plausible solution [117]. Other kind of heavy metal pollution can result from the continuous stream of polluted sediments, dredged from harbors and water bodies in order to maintain the navigation; it is a common practice, but the fate of these sediments is an issue recognized worldwide. A pilot case study evaluated the application of phytoremediation as sustainable management strategy for the decontamination of polluted dredged marine sediments [118].
In general, and in relation to the remediation process, organic biodegradable sludges have been found to improve the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soils by (1) raising the pH; (2) increasing the organic matter content; (3) adding essential nutrients for plant growth; (4) increasing the water holding capacity; and (5) decrasing the bioavailability of metals [119,120].
The combination of organic amendments (sewage sludge and domestic waste compost) and mulches (gravel and woodchip) has proved to be a good strategy for restoring degraded soils in semiarid quarrying areas, improving soil physical chemical and microbiological properties, particularly in compost treated soils [121].
Together physical soil degradation, salinization is one of the most serious problems affecting agricultural soils, particularly in arid and semiarid areas, such as those of the Mediterranean basin, where water scarcity has led to the use of low quality irrigation waters. The loss of productivity in saline soils is not only due to the negative effect on soil and plant caused by the excess of soluble salts but also by the scarcity of organic matter, which is aggravated in arid and semiarid areas due to the fact that the adverse climatic conditions (high average annual temperature and scarce but intense rainfall events) existing in these areas, accelerate organic matter mineralization processes. It has been reported [122] that addition of organic amendments, particularly composts, used to maintain or increase agricultural soil fertility can be also a promising way of minimizing the negative effects of soil salinization. Good quality organic amendments are exempt of contaminants, and their high organic matter and nutrient content will contribute to enhance the quality of salinized soils by promoting clay mineral flocculation and soil aggregate formation. Tejada et al. [18] reported that 5 years after the addition of organic wastes (cotton gin crushed compost and poultry manure) to a saline soil under semiarid conditions, the treated soils showed denser vegetal cover (80%) than the non-treated soil (8%) as well as enhanced soil physical, chemical and biological properties.
Many published studies have demonstrated that organic amendments can help improve soil quality, resulting in soils with greater organic matter content, enhanced agronomic stability and improved soil structure [123,124]. The main functions of organic amendments in soils are as follows: (1) promotion of soil aggregation; (2) provision of plant nutrients; and (3) a reduction in water content loss, in addition to other beneficial functions. Organic amendments are thus applied to improve soil physical, chemical and microbiological properties [38,125]. However, it is essential to carefully characterise and consider all the physical, chemical, and microbiological properties of the potential soil amendments when choosing an organic amendment for restoration purposes (Table 1).
Properties | Effect | References |
Physical properties | ||
pH | Decrease | [11,172] |
pH | Increase | [66,71] |
Soil aggregate stability | Increase | [29,126,127] |
Bulk density | Decrease | [29,126,127] |
Water holding capacity | Increase | [21,29,72,126,127] |
Porosity | Increase | [21,29,126,127] |
Erosion | Decrease | [126] |
Humic content | Increase | [21,190] |
Chemical properties | ||
TOC | Increase | [26,71,99,143,177] |
EC | Increase | [21,72,127] |
N and P | Increase | [27,31,32,71,127,177] |
Heavy metals | Increase | [174,176,190,191] |
Biochemical and microbiological properties | ||
Microbial activity | Increase | [21,26,50,59,129,148,151] |
Basal respiration | Increase | [21,151,177] |
Microbial biomass | Increase | [21,59,152] |
Pathogenic level | Increase | [127,190] |
Regarding soil physical properties, aggregate stability is one of the most important factors affecting soil quality and fertility. As mentioned previously, organic amendments can contribute to maintain soil physical conditions, including soil structure stability [27]. Accordingly, several publications encourage the use of sewage sludges for soil restoration purposes. It is well known that sludge application improves the quality of soils by improving their physico-chemical properties, increasing soil aggregation, porosity, water holding capacity and hydraulic conductivity and decreasing bulk density [29,126,127]. During the anaerobic digestion of sludges, the more recalcitrant carbon compounds like lignin and humic substances are scarcely degraded. As a result, these compounds are highly reactive and can interact directly with soil surfaces to strengthen the aggregates. The chemical properties of sludge-soil mixtures not only depend on the properties of the soil and sludges and the application rates of the mixtures, but also on their interaction and soil pH [128]. Relatively high rates of sludge application have been found to increase the cation exchange capacity, which helps to retain essential plant nutrients within the rooting zone due to additional cation binding sites. Such responses, however, depend upon the sewage: soil ratio. Sewage sludge addition to soils could therefore also affect the potential availability of heavy metals. Trace metal bioavailability is also dependent on the form of the organic matter, i.e., whether it is soluble (fulvic acid) or insoluble (humic acid). In addition to sewage sludges, composted organic residues such as urban wastes have also demonstrated significant positive effects on soil physical properties, likewise producing increases in stable aggregates, water holding capacity and porosity [21,129]. Organic matter and carbohydrates appear to be the parameters most closely related to the structural [131,132,133] stability of soil aggregates. Organic matter break-down give rise to compounds, particularly carbohydrates that can be linked to soil mineral particles improving soil aggregation. This, in turn, contributes to improving soil resistance to erosion [130]. The increases in these properties, clearly linked to soil fertility and productivity, are closely related to the increase in SOM content produced by the compost [131,132,133]. Furthermore, the activity of soil microorganisms and their decomposition products also promote soil stability [134].
The application of organic materials can enhance the nutrient status of soils, serving as a source of both macro-and micro-nutrients. Organic amendments can also improve soil physical properties by increasing soil porosity and water retention due to the presence of humic-like substances (poly-condensed macromolecular structure). Furthermore, organic amendments generate progressive plant growth [11,135], and plant inputs promote the development and activity of the microbial biomass in the soil, which in turn, increases soil fertility in the long term [125,136]. Different types of organic amendments have been applied in arid and semiarid environments, including crop residues, pig slurry, farmyard manure, municipal solid waste, olive mill waste and sewage sludges. Despite the potential benefits, however, organic amendments must be used carefully, since they do not always suppose an increase in soil quality. For instance, Tejada et al. [137] reported that the application of fresh beet vinasse worsened the physical and biological properties of the soil due to the sodium ion content of the amendment.
The stability and nature of the amendment used can determine the residence time of the added organic carbon [138,139]. In dryland ecosystems, due to the high potential for carbon sequestration, the stabilisation of SOM is believed to be controlled by both, the quantity of the inputs and their interaction with the soil matrix (i.e., texture) and the quality of the organic amendment [77,140,141]. Fine soil particles are thought to play a critical role in C fixation. Some authors have observed an increase in the carbon fixation in fine particles (clay or silt) after applying organic amendments [141], while others have not found any variation in the organic carbon content of the fine fractions in the long term. Recent studies based on carbon stable-isotope probing have also suggested that clays can protect some added organic compounds in the soil despite their highly labile nature (i.e., 13C-glucose) [88].
Measurement of soil enzyme activity has been proposed as a sensitive tool to be used as a potential indicator of soil quality [142], as it integrates the chemical, physical and biological characteristics of the soil. Since mature composts consists of about 30–50% organic C [143], the addition of compost to soil—even at small amounts—has a considerable effect on SOM content, which typically ranges from 0.1 to 5%, depending on land use, vegetation and contamination [99]. The addition of organic matter to the soil also leads to a significant shift in microbial activity due to changes in soil properties and substrate availability. An increase in the activity of certain soil enzymes, such as β-glucosidase indicates energy release for microorganisms, as an attribute of the type of organic matter added to the soil. This agrees with other studies demonstrating that composts from wastes stimulates microbial activity in soils, increasing organic matter mineralisation and thus supporting microorganism growth and activation [34,129,144]. The mechanism that drives the increase in microbial activity could be an apparent priming effect [145,146], by which fresh organic matter inputs can activate soil microorganisms, promoting the degradation of SOM as a result of activated co-metabolism [147]. It is assumed that the intrinsic microbial activity of the compost surrenders to the activity of the original population in the soil with minimal impact on the soil microbial community [148]. Any changes occurring in soil microbial characteristics are thought to be due essentially to the input of a compost matrix rich in organic matter and only marginally to the input of compost-borne microorganisms [11,148]. In contrast, other studies have shown that the incorporation of external organic matter to the soil matrix can modify its microbial community by adding a considerable amount of compost-bond microorganisms (bacteria and fungi), which may result in competition and/or antagonism with the existing soil microorganisms for resources [149]. This scenario can lead to a decrease in soil microbial biomass, although it does not necessarily have to affect the overall soil microbial activity. In some cases, involving sewage sludge additions, negative effects have been observed in soil enzymatic activities due to metals present in the sludge [150], depending on the sludge origin. Generally, however, sewage sludges have been found to increase soil microbial activity, soil respiration and soil enzyme activity. Pascual et al. [151], for example, observed a positive effect on hydrolase enzyme activities and a significant increase in soil microbial biomass 10 years after applying municipal solid waste (MSW) to an abandoned agricultural soil. This suggests that the reactivation of the biochemical cycles of N (urease and protease-BAA activity), P (phosphatase activity) and C (β-glucosidase activity) caused by the added organic waste, and the consequent improvement of soil fertility, persisted 10 years after the organic amendment. These benefits were linked to a re-established vegetation cover, which contributed to the observed long term effects. Since approximately half of the organic matter added as MSW was mineralised in the first year, these authors [151] attributed the higher organic C content observed in the restored soils compared with the control after 10 years, to the presence of a well-established plant cover, which will continuously provide C to the soil throughout root exudates and plant remains. Organic amendments not only increase the SOM content, but also lead to the development of a natural vegetation cover capable of maintaining the natural process of nutrient cycling in soils.
To give another example, Carlson et al. [50] conducted a restoration assay in a degraded industrial soil using great doses of different types of organic amendments: vegetative yard compost, biosolids from sewage sludge, a mixture of biosolid and biochar, and a water treatment residue. They found that, at the biochemical level, the addition of biosolids—alone or mixed with biochar—led to increases in the enzyme activity in the receiving soil in comparison to the control soil even 3 years after application. At the microbiological level, the addition of biosolids increased the presence of fungi in the soil and reduced the quantity of some stress biomarkers in the degraded soil, promoting the recuperation process. Fungal populations still dominated the soil 3 years after the addition, highlighting their great ability for degrading the more recalcitrant compounds. Given these results, the authors suggested repeated biosolid applications at least every 3 years, with the aim of achieving long term effects on the soil enzyme activities.
According to Aguacil et al. [152], the application of organic amendments (urban refuse) can have a positive effect on the proliferation of natural arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi in crop systems. The stimulatory effects of the addition of organic matter on the development of AM fungi could be related to an improvement in the extensive network of AM fungal mycelium in the soil. These authors concluded that the addition of different doses of urban refuse improved a wide spectrum of soil properties related with microbial activity when measured 19 years later, and the increase was proportional to the applied dose. The AM fungi community was also more diverse after applying the amendment. Subsequently, Hernández et al. [21] also observed increases in the organic C fraction in soils amended with composted urban waste, even 5 years after application. The soil nutrient and humic substance contents were greater in the amended soils than in the control, and the greater applied dose (3%) produced greater increases than the smaller dose (1%). As a result, soils receiving the greatest dose of this compost also showed the highest values of basal respiration, dehydrogenase activity and β-glucosidase and phosphatase activities, as well as a greater microbial biomass. It has thus been demonstrated that the application of large amounts of organic amendments is an appropriate strategy for repairing the microbial and biochemical status of degraded soils.
Sequencing techniques have started to provide a deeper understanding of the composition of soil microbial communities, enzyme activities and community-level physiological profiles [153,154]; These techniques are valuable tools for assessing the potential ability of soil microbial communities to metabolise a range of substrates [155]. Beyond this, new advances in genomic and proteomic approaches are making it possible to establish links between soil microbial community structure and function, improving our understanding of the processes that mediate the generation and mineralisation of SOM, especially in degraded soils, before adding organic matter. Bastida et al. [28] studied the long-term responses of the microbial community of a degraded and abandoned soil to fresh and composted sewage sludge addition. They found that the type of organic amendment did not affect the internal metabolic processes or lifestyles of the dominant microbial groups (Proteobacteria), suggesting that the differences between restored and non-restored soils are mainly controlled by extracellular enzymes and proteins linked to microbial biomass. The Proteobacteria community, a dominant microbial group in arid soils in general, increased significantly in the restored soils, as other authors have observed [28,156,157]. According to Chaudhry et al. [157] in long term restoration experiments, organic compost amendments activate diverse groups of microorganisms to a greater extent than conventionally-used synthetic chemical fertilisers, suggesting that soil quality improvements are due to the reactivation of the microbial metabolic routes.
Organic amendments favour the development of a spontaneous vegetal cover when added to degraded soils. The relationship between plant cover and microbial community composition has been explored extensively and it has been reported that the presence of plant cover shapes the structure of microbial communities in soils in the Negev Desert [158], the Colorado Plateau region [159], South-east Spain [160] and central Chile. Furthermore, Angel et al. [161] studied the diversity and community composition of archaea and bacteria along a climate gradient in Israel and found differences among different climate sites due to the precipitation gradient and vegetation cover.
Several groups of authors have explored the composition and structure of the soil bacterial community in the arid area of Atacama (Chile). For instance, Neilson et al. [162] studied the bacterial diversity in unvegetated soils from the hyperarid margin of the Atacama Desert and found a high abundance of novel Actinobacteria and Chloroflexi, and greater community diversity and different community structure than that found for other authors [163,164] in also devegetated hyperarid regions. These authors [162] attributed the enhanced bacterial diversity found at the hyperarid margin to exposure to past vegetation history. Connon et al. [163] also found a predominance of Actinobacteria whereas Drees et al. [164] found a predominance of Gemmatimonadetes and Planctomycetes in the hyperarid devegetated areas of Atacama.
Similar patterns have been noted in other arid and semiarid areas of the planet, indicating a common eco-biogeography of the bacterial communities. For instance, Bastida et al. [88] found that Actinobacteria was also dominant in arid soils from south-east Spain and that it relative abundance diminished in restored amended soils; some minor bacterial groups (Gemmatimonadetes and Planctomycetes) were also less abundant in a control soil than in a restored soil. Despite their low abundance, the ability of the Gemmatimonadetes and Planctomycetes to trigger in degraded areas must be explored more deeply from a functional point of view.
The abandonment of Mediterranean soils after intensive agricultural practices results in a loss of soil quality, and the longer the soils are left abandoned, the more degraded they become [151]. The main reasons for this decline are probably a combination of the low levels of organic matter, nutrients and microbial activity in the soil. Adding organic wastes to abandoned and degraded soils can be a good strategy for preserving and improving soil quality for future use. As we mentioned before, organic amendments not only increase the organic matter in the soil, but they also stimulate the development of natural vegetation capable of maintaining significant microbial biomass in the soil and providing an almost steady supply of nutrients via plant inputs into the soil (Table 2). The relationship between organic amendments and organic C retention in soils has been studied by several different authors, who have reached contrasting conclusions regarding the adequate quality and quantity of the different types of organic matter applied to the soil. For instance, Drees et al. [165] showed that inputs of fresh organic matter accelerated the decomposition of soil C and induced a negative C balance, increasing CO2 emissions from the soil into the atmosphere. In relation to the quality of the amendment, Tejada et al. [60] observed a positive impact in soils amended with composted organic residues rather than with fresh organic residues. Fresh organic amendments, such as beet vinasse, cattle manure and untreated sewage sludge, usually decrease soil structural stability, reducing soil porosity and affecting the physical and biological properties of the soil due to the presence of sodium ions, among others. This suggests that not all kinds of residues are adequate for direct application in soils. Plaza et al. [37] indicated that pig slurry was not appropriate for use on agricultural soils because it increased the soil microbial population due to the addition of an easy mineralisable C source, which did not contribute to the formation of a stable organic C pool in the soil. Furthermore, in N-rich environments provided by the addition of animal manures and slurries, the C content is scarce and the soil often responds to this perturbation with further increases in the mineralisation of indigenous SOM, resulting in a net loss of C and N. In contrast, composted residues hasten increases in SOM [142]. During composting, the biodegradable organic compounds are mineralised, whereas some of the remaining organic materials become precursors of humic substances [166]. During the decay and transformation of biomolecules, humic acids are formed by secondary biotic synthesis reactions or re-synthesis [167], so the humic substances are considered as the final product of organic matter stabilisation. As a result, the humic substances play an essential role in biochemical soil reactions, such as the reduction, oxidation, sorption and complexation of pollutants and C sequestration [168,169]. The different type of raw materials used for composting will determine the generation of different humic substances depending on their chemical composition [166,170,171]. In the environment, chemical components of humic acids, such as polyketides and humins, are extremely resistant to biodegradation, with a half-decay time of thousands of years [167,172]. These components are thus part of the more stable fraction of SOM. According to Lynch et al. [173], 75–95% of the C applied through compost remained in the soil one year after the compost was applied, increasing the recalcitrance of the organic matter with prolonged storage in the non-mineral soil fractions.
Reference | Organic material | Application rate | Soil type | Period of time | Reported benefits |
[151] | Municipal solid waste | 6.5 and 26 kg m–2 | Abandoned agricultural soil (Spain) | Long term (20 years) | Reactivation of soil biochemical functions and increase in soil fertility |
[59] | Municipal solid waste compost (MSW) and cow manure (MA) | MSW at 20 and 80 t ha–1 and MA at 20 t ha–1 | Agricultural soil (Spain) | Long term (9 years) | MSW compost can improve soil quality, increasing the organic matter content and improve soil biological and biochemical properties |
[125] | Fresh and composed urban waste | 25–30 kg m–2 | Abandoned agricultural soil (Spain) | Short term (1 year) | Increases in organic matter and microbial biomass, the maintenance of the soil's biochemical cycles and the establishment of a plant cover |
[174] | Composted municipal solid waste (MSW) | 40, 80 and 120 Mg ha–1 of MSW | Calcareous soil (Spain) | Short term (5 years) | MSW application has a positive effect on the soil chemical properties and promotes the growth of native vegetation without causing environmental damage |
[60] | Beet vinasse, green manure and a composted mixture of both residues | Equivalence of 10 t organic matter ha–1 | Restoration of a Xelloric Calciorthid soil (Spain) | Short term (4 years) | Beet vinasse had a detrimental effect on soil properties while green manure and the composted mixture had positive effects on soil physical and biological properties |
[11] | Municipal solid waste | 65,130,195 and 260 t ha–1 | Semiarid abandoned soil (Spain) | Long term (17 years) | Improvement in the soil biochemical properties and changes in the soil microbial community |
[152] | Organic urban refuse | 6.5, 13.0, 19.5 and 26.0 kg m–2 | Mediterranean semiarid soil (Spain) | Long term (19 years) | Improvement in the soil biochemical and microbiological properties in relation to the applied dose |
[64] | Hydrolysates organic biofertilisers or biostimulants | 4.7 t organic matter ha–1 | Eroded soil (Spain) | Short term (3 years) | Positive effect on soil biological properties, and favourable to vegetal establishment |
[177] | Composted sewage sludge | 30, 60 and 90 Mg ha–1 | Abandoned agricultural soil (Spain) | Short term (3 years) | Increases in chemical and biological soil properties at higher doses |
[179] | Composted dry organic green waste | 7 Kg m–2 (1.42 kg C m–2, and 129 g N m–2) | Grassland soils (California, US) | Short term (3 years) | A single application of compost increases soil C and N storage in labile and physically protected pools over relatively short time periods, contributing to climate change mitigation |
[28] | Composted and anaerobic digested sewage sludge | 12 kg m–2 | Arid-degraded soil (Spain) | Long term (10 years) | The long-term impact of organic restoration affects soil microbial community function and structure, and it depends on the material added to the soil |
[50] | Vegetative compost (VC) and biosolids (BS) | 137 mg ha–1 (VC); 202 and 403 mg ha–1(BS) | Degraded soil (Illinois, US) | Short term (3 years) | Stimulates fungal populations and soil enzyme activities |
[26] | Pelletized plant, animal and sewage sludge compost (PEL); Municipal solid waste compost (MSW); Sheep manure compost (SMC) | 3700 of PEL, 4075 of MSW, and 4630 kg ha–1 of SMC (fresh weights) | Vineyard soil (Spain) | Long term (13 years) | Continuous long-term application of organic amendments positively affects soil quality, increasing microbial activity, C storage and denitrification potential |
[223] | Urban municipal solid waste compost (MSW) and alfalfa residue (AR) | 10 and 30 Mg ha–1 (MSW and AR) | Semiarid soil (Kerman, Iran) | Short term (2 years) | Higher respiration and decomposability in the MSW-treated soils resulted in greater formation of water stable aggregates and an increase in the macro-pore fraction, but reduced levels of SOC more than in AR soils. |
[213] | NPK + straw (NPK + s), and NPK + manure (NPK + m) | 37% NPK + s and 32% NPK + m (more N input than for NPK alone). | Paddy soils (China) | Long term experiments | Manure can increase the rice yield and soil C sequestration. Applying both chemical and organic fertilisers (NPK + m) leads to a longer duration of soil C sequestration than a chemical fertiliser alone. |
Regarding the effects of organic amendments on soil biochemical reactions, Carlson et al. [50] found that the greatest impact on soil enzyme activities occurred within the first year after amending. The treatment effects were transitory, and after 3 years, certain enzyme activities were either equal to or nearly equal to the control levels. These authors suggested that repeated applications—at least every 3 years—may be needed for achieving long term effects on soil enzyme activities. However, the initial increase in activity generated by organic amendments may be sufficient to restore a natural vegetative cover in the short term. This study also provides evidence that composts made from biosolids or treated sewage sludge produce more significant and longer-lasting increases in fungal groups in the soil than urban waste, probably due to the unique ability of the former to degrade the more recalcitrant organic compounds, which is encouraged by adding large rates. Both the quality and the quantity of the organic amendments added thus influence the effectiveness of the restoration process.
Many authors have affirmed that a single application of a high dose of organic matter is usually enough to recuperate the plant cover in degraded soils [50,86,174] by maintaining high organic C levels for a long period of time. Normally, a period of five years should be enough to observe a natural restoration process when a plant cover develops [21]. According to Henández et al. [21], adding large amounts of compost in a sole application leads to greater improvements in the physical, chemical and microbiological properties of the soil and to a greater increase in the pool of organic C in degraded soils in semiarid zones. Due to their low natural organic matter content, these soils are able to receive large amounts of exogenous organic C, which remains in part fixed in the soil in a stable manner as humic acids. Other authors [175,176] have suggested to use an application frequency of once every other year after the initial addition of an organic amendment (compost in both cases), because the N release from compost mainly occurs in the first two years, yet only 30–35% of total N is released during the first year. The residual effect of cumulative applications leads to deferred greater N availability and yields, indicating physical protection of this nutrient within macroaggregates [27]. Normally, the applied dose and the time elapsed since the amendments are closely related. In short-term experiments, greater application rates cause a greater response in soil biochemical and microbiological parameters, whereas the physical properties of the soil may not have changed as much as the biological properties, because the latter properties are more sensitive indicators. A study conducted by Fernández-Getino et al. [177] showed that applying large doses (60 and 90 Mg ha–1) of biosolids to the soil significantly increased several chemical and biological soil properties, such as organic C content, humified C fractions, water soluble C, total N, basal respiration, and potential N mineralisation, without impairing the soil physical properties. Fabrizio et al. [178] and Ryals and Silver [179] found that large doses of organic amendments increased the amount of C sequestered in the soil, with little impact on the microbial community [180]. Bastida et al. [136] observed similar effects in a long term soil restoration assay (25 years) using domestic solid wastes. These authors observed an increase in the soil nutrient content, although the treated soil did not support a more diverse microbial community than the control soil. This study also found that the application of large doses of organic wastes (195 Mg ha–1) indirectly modified the structure of the bacterial and fungal soil communities and that these effects were mainly mediated by the development of natural vegetation and changes in soil pH and the organic C and N concentrations in the soil. Small doses, however, did not modify such community structure, but they did foster microbial activity to the same extent as in plots amended with large doses.
Because of the long period of time required for a degraded soil to reach a new equilibrium, the effect of organic amendments on the SOM should be studied in long term field experiments [27] rather than in short term assays. Macias and Camps-Arbestain [181] found that, in general, the addition of a great amount of organic matter makes a larger fraction of the SOM susceptible to oxidation and microbial decomposition. However, according to the literature, the degradation rate depends on the quality of the organic matter [182], its distribution [183] and the priming effect caused in the microbial community [146]. In a long term experiment conducted by García-Gil et al. [59], multiple additions of municipal solid waste compost at rates of 20 and 80 Mg ha–1 increased microbial biomass C, and this increase persisted even 8 years after application. Soil basal respiration, a parameter used to monitor microbial activity, has also been found to increase and persist 8 years after compost application [53].
The long-term impact of anaerobic digestates on soil properties remains an unexplored field of research. A 4-year field trial conducted by Odlare et al. [184] in eastern Sweden showed that soil chemical properties hardly change in the short term when soil is amended with organic waste, including digestates. However, relative to other treatments (pig manure, cow manure, compost, inorganic fertiliser), the soils treated with liquid digestates from household wastes displayed the greatest microbial biomass, N mineralisation rate and ammonia oxidation potential. This suggests that liquid digestates affect the soil chemical and microbiological properties in the short term, whereas their effects are not as significant in the long term, as we have mentioned before. Microbial biomass and potentially mineralisable N have been commonly suggested as biological and chemical indicators of soil quality in restoration initiatives, since both parameters are sensitive to organic amendments [185].
In the short and long term, both the nature and quality of the organic amendment used therefore affect the microbial soil response. Calleja-Cervantes et al. [26] found that several composted organic residues did not affected the soil bacterial community in the short term (15 days after application). Furthermore, the effects did not vary according to the type of compost, and all treated soils responded uniformly to environmental changes, without suffering too much damage to the microbial soil community structure and composition. In contrast, Ge et al. [186] reported that the application of manures from farming caused pronounced changes in the composition of the bacterial community. Undoubtedly, this difference is due to the type of organic amendment used. Composted residues have gone through a process of chemical and microbiological stabilisation, and the resulting product is a safe, high quality organic amendment. The application of fresh organic amendments produces modifications in the chemical and microbiological soil properties in a shorter period of time. However, such fresh amendments are less efficient in fomenting the long term restoration of SOM.
The benefits of long-term soil restoration also include the effects of the plant cover in the soil. Plant cover is a natural source of organic amendments, providing root exudates that may act as substrates for enzymatic activities [11]. In addition, plant inputs contribute in the long term to the pool of humic substances that could be linked to enzymes. Some studies using organic amendments have concluded that the greatest doses are most effective in sustaining significant differences in organic C content compared to the control soil [21], whereas others maintain plant cover but do not show a higher organic C level. In the case of a sole addition, the effects diminish over time, but if a plant cover develops, it contributes to C inputs in the soil. In the case of dryland agroecosystems, such as those found in the Mediterranean region, the application of organic amendments must be accompanied with conservational management practices in order to maintain the C reserve in the soils [7].
Sewage sludges are among the most widely used organic amendments in soil restoration, although it remains controversial due to the possible transference of potentially toxic elements to the soil [187,188,189,190]. These elements include metals, pathogens and organic pollutants, which can sometimes reach the soil if they are not properly eliminated in the sanitisation process. This can be a serious problem in agricultural soils when sewage sludges are used for long periods of time [29,191]. The use of animal manures also represents a risk of pathogen contamination [192]. Bacteria such as Salmonella, E. coli, Yersinia, Campylobacter and the protozoa Giardia and Cryptosporidium are the most prevalent pathogenic microorganisms found in manures [193,194]. The risk of pathogens embedded in manures can be mitigated, however, through integrated or post-sanitation configuration of the anaerobic digestion process [195,196]. Despite hygienisation, pathogenic parasite eggs, bacteria and fungi have been found to persist in many biogas plants [197,198]. Nevertheless, heavy metals and other harmful substances are regulated in Europe by the Council Directive on the protection of the environment, particularly in agricultural soils subjected to sewage sludge treatments [199]. The risk of contamination is not such a disadvantage in the restoration of degraded and abandoned soils, however, in which the permitted level of pollutants is not as strict as it is in the case of agricultural soils.
There are also other environmental risks derived from the use of organic amendments in soil restoration such water run-off contamination, when the amendment is left in surface without incorporation into the soil, or soil salinization [200,201]. Organic amendments, particularly composts, can contain great amounts of salts becoming a potential risk when added to the soil due the known detrimental effect that salinity has on soil structure and plant growth [202,203]. In addition, under some particular irrigation conditions salts can be lixiviated from the amendment increasing the risk of groundwater contamination by nitrates, P compounds or heavy metals [204]. The salinisation risk depends in part on the quality of the soil and subsoil, especially in terms of pH and texture. Acidic soils, for example, have a higher potential to solubilise salts. Sewage sludge compost could also favour the solubility of metals because its pH is slightly acidic. According to Diacono and Montemurro [27], environmental problems associated with organic amendments are closely related to the application of immature compost and organic materials that have not been sufficiently stabilised by composting or anaerobic digestion. Such problems include increases in ammonia volatilisation, decreases in the soil oxygen concentration, the production of phytotoxic compounds, and the immobilisation of soil mineral N. According to the literature reviewed on this topic, however, there is plenty of evidence supporting the capability of stabilised organic amendments to improve the physical, biochemical and microbiological properties of the soil.
Soil is one of the most complex biomaterials on earth [205], and it is a key component of the terrestrial ecosystem operating at the interface of the lithosphere, biosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere. While climate, food, water, biodiversity and energy have received much attention in strategic international environmental publications, this is less the case with soil science. According to Dominati et al. [206], it is therefore essential to emphasise the role soils play in providing ecosystem services, given that soils are an important part of ecosystem functions (Table 3). Several authors [207,208,209] have discussed the pressing need to include soils in ecosystem service frameworks and policy decision-making. Recently, following the UN-Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) proposed by Bouma [210], soil science has been included in the ecosystem services net. Soil ecosystem services depend on soil properties and their interactions and are mostly influenced by soil use and management [4]. Landslides, erosion and decreases in soil C and biodiversity lead to soil degradation, which is a serious global challenge for food security and ecosystem sustainability [211,212]. The contribution of soils to human welfare beyond food production must also be recognised [208], and this can be accomplished by incorporating soils into ecosystem service frameworks and demonstrating the multitude of functions soils provide to our society [206].
Provisioning services |
Provision of food, wood and fibre |
Provision of raw materials |
Provision of support for human infrastructures and animals |
Regulating services |
Flood mitigation |
Filtering of nutrients and contaminants |
C storage and greenhouse gas regulation |
Detoxification and the recycling of wastes |
Regulation of pests and disease populations |
Cultural services |
Recreation |
Aesthetics |
Heritage values |
Cultural identity |
The emerging term "domesticated soil" is used to designate a soil managed in a way that improves its efficiency in capturing and storing atmospheric CO2 [213]. Using improved management practices on cultivated soils can sequester organic C at a rate of 0.36 Gt year–1 and increase N use efficiency by 32–57% [214].
C sequestration is among the most important soil functions. More precisely, C sequestration implies the fixation of atmospheric CO2 via plant photosynthesis and its storage as part of the SOM. On the other hand, the soil C pool can be a source and sink for the atmospheric CO2, depending on the land use and management practice [134]. Terrestrial soils contain reserves of organic C estimated at between 1500 and 1700 Pg [215]. SOM is an often recalcitrant complex that is both synthesised and degraded by microbial enzyme activities. The balance between these two competing processes determines how much C is sequestered, contributing to the following indicators of soil quality: soil aggregate structure and stability [216]; plant nutrient availability; water retention and soil management [217]; microbial diversity and activity; and a host of enzymatic properties that determine soil fertility and plant productivity [218,219]. By using organic amendments, we are therefore able to alter the outcomes of global warming by increasing the organic C stored in the soil [181]. It is necessary, however, to take into account soil microbial responses, including soil enzyme activities, which may affect recalcitrant humic matter [220]. It is also important to consider the impact of manipulated C sequestration, specifically in the form of biochar additions, on soil microbial and enzymatic properties [221], contributing to C storage in the soil. A study conducted by Montiel-Rozas et al. [222] to evaluate C sequestration in soils restored by applying organic amendments (leonardite and biosolid compost) revealed that both amendments promoted soil C storage while improved soil characteristics. This positive effect on C storage depended on the application rate and on the characteristics of the organic amendment being greater for the more aromatic material (leonardite).
Soil is a finite natural resource. The increasing degradation of soil caused by population pressures, environmental conditions and inadequate governance over this valuable resource, has become a worrying reality. In addition, the sustainable and productive use of the world soil resources should therefore be recognized as a primary goal in the future. But this valuable resource is threatened and urgent actions have to be implemented in order to assure the necessary soil restoration and to maintain edaphic fertility for future generations. All of this is particularly urgent in soils under arid and semiarid climate.
In this scenario, some important points to be taken into consideration are the following:
(1) Soil degradation processes put at risk soil conservation and protection, constituting a serious problem in arid and semiarid environments. Climate change could increase this risk. In this sense, the loss of organic matter is one of the main threats for soil degradation, pointing to the exogenous organic matter (that can be added to the soil as amendment such as organic wastes) as an invaluable source of organic matter, contributing not only to soil restoration but also to fixing C in such soil. So, organic wastes with an adequate quality, can be a good source of organic matter for soils, and for this reason the addition of such organic wastes can be a good strategy for degraded soil restoration.
(2) In order to obtain the best results for soil restoration when organic wastes are used, some aspects should be considered; for example, in order to reduce the loss of the C proceeding from the organic amendment by mineralization, it could be necessary in some cases to stabilize such C by mean of mechanisms that allow elongating its life in the soil. In addition, to stablish the quality of organic amendments, the application doses for the organic amendments (for instance, to determine if it is possible a unique organic amendments addition to degraded soils in arid and semiarid areas), the adequate management of such organic amendments, will be important for the success in soil restoration. In this sense, several parameters which can help to monitor organic waste quality, and soil restoration are also necessary.
(3) When organic amendments are recycled in the soil, some soil properties (physical, chemical and biological) can change. Organic amendments are a "live organic material", and they can induce changes in the soil biota. Soil organisms provide numerous and essential services. We need progresses in the knowledge of soil community microbial compositions in soils amended with organic wastes; the cycles of key nutritional element such as C, N, P and S are closely related with specific microbial populations and for this reason with soil fertility and quality. Soil biodiversity is difficult to characterize but there are new techniques which have allowed exploring soil in a way that was not previously possible; techniques (PFLAs, -omics as genomic and proteomic, together with other techniques such as soil respiration or soil enzyme activities) incorporated to soil science study, particularly to the study of soil rehabilitation when organic amendments are used, should be standardized. Biodiversity in soils restored with organic amendments can help to understand soil sustainability, and it could be the key for soil production in the future.
As a general conclusion, it can be indicated that the recycling in the soil of organic amendments, normally based on organic wastes, never must be a dumping but a consistent application. It is urgent to legislate to protect the soil against possible external aggressions, such as the use of organic amendments (organic wastes) of very poor quality; however, when soils can accept exogenous sources of organic matter such as amendments based on good quality organic wastes, and this addition is done in a controlled manner, this strategy can be very useful to improve the fertility of such soils, avoiding degradative processes in them.
This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitively within the project: AGL2014-54636-R. Authors also thanks "Fundación Séneca" for his financial support as Excellence Research Group. Authors indicate that there is not any conflict of interest.
Authors inform that there is not any conflict of interest.
[1] | Mol G, Keesstra SD (2012) Soil science in a changing world. Curr Opin Environ Sust 4: 473-477. |
[2] | Keesstra SD, Bouma J, Wallinga J, et al. (2016) The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, SOIL 2: 111-128. |
[3] |
Bastida F, Moreno JL, Hernández T, et al. (2006) Microbiological degradation index of soils in a semiarid climate. Soil Biol Biochem 38: 3463-3473. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.06.001
![]() |
[4] |
Adhikari K, Hartemink AE (2016) Linking soils to ecosystem services-A global review. Geoderma 262: 101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.009
![]() |
[5] |
Rasmussen C, Southard RJ, Howarth WR (2006) Mineral control of organic carbon mineralization in a range of temperate conifer forest soils. Global Change Biol 12: 834-847. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01132.x
![]() |
[6] |
Lal R, Follett RF, Kimble JM, et al. (2003) Achieving soil carbon sequestration in the United States: a challenge to the policy makers. Soil Sci 168: 827-845. doi: 10.1097/01.ss.0000106407.84926.6b
![]() |
[7] |
Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123: 1-22. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.032
![]() |
[8] |
Bai ZG, Dent DL, Olsson L, et al. (2008) Proxy global assessment of land degradation. Soil Use Manage 24: 223-234. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2008.00169.x
![]() |
[9] | COM 2002, 179. Communication from the Commission to the Council and European Parliament, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Towards a thematic strategy for soil protection. Available from: http:// Europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/pdf/2002/com2002_0170en01.pdf. |
[10] | Council Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage. |
[11] |
Bastida F, Kandeler E, Moreno JL, et al. (2008) Application of fresh and composted organic wastes modifies structure, size and activity XE "activity" of soil microbial community under semiarid climate. Appl Soil Ecol 40: 318-329. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.05.007
![]() |
[12] |
Lal R (2011) Sequestering carbon in soils of agro-ecosystems. Food Policy 36: 33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.12.001
![]() |
[13] |
Kaiser K, Guggenberger G (2003) Mineral surfaces and soil organic matter. Eur J Soil Sci 54: 219-236. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.00544.x
![]() |
[14] |
Kalbitz K, Schwesiga D, Rethemeyerb J, et al. (2005) Stabilization of dissolved organic matter by sorption to the mineral soil. Soil Biol Biochem 37: 1319-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.11.028
![]() |
[15] | Six J, Jastrow, JD (2002) Organic matter turnover. Encyclopedia of Soil Science. Marcel Dekker, Inc. |
[16] |
Pulleman MM, Marinissen JCY (2004) Physical protection of mineralizable C in aggregates from long-term pasture and arable soil. Geoderma 120: 273-282. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.09.009
![]() |
[17] |
García C, Hernández T, Roldán A, et al. (2000) Organic amendment and mycorrhizal inoculation as a practice in afforestation of soils with Pinus halepensis Miller: effect on their microbial activity. Soil Biol Biochem 32: 1173-1181. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00033-X
![]() |
[18] | Tejada M, García C, Gonzalez JL, et al. (2006) Use of organic amendment as a strategy for saline soil remediation: Influence on the physical, Chemical and biological properties of the soil. Soil Biol Biochem 38: 1413-1421. |
[19] |
Garcia C, Hernandez T (1996) Organic matter in bare soils of the Mediterranean region with semi-arid climate. Arid Soil Res Rehab 10: 31-41. doi: 10.1080/15324989609381418
![]() |
[20] | Zdruli P, Jones RJA, Montanarella L (2004) Organic matter in the soils of Southern Europe. European Soil Bureau Research Report Nº 15. OOP EC, EUR 21083 EN Luxembourg. |
[21] | Hernández MT, García E, García C (2015) A strategy for marginal semiarid degraded soil restoration: A sole addition of compost at a high rate. A five-year field experiment. Soil Biol Biochem 89: 61-71. |
[22] |
Zalidis G, Stamatiadis S, Takavaoglou V, et al. (2002) Impacts of agricultural practices on soil and water quality in the Mediterranean region and proposed assessment methodology. Agric Ecosyt Environ 88: 137-146. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00249-3
![]() |
[23] |
Dunjó G, Pardini G, Gispert M (2003) Land use change effects on abandoned terraced soils in a Mediterranean catchment, NE Spain. Catena 52: 23-37. doi: 10.1016/S0341-8162(02)00148-0
![]() |
[24] |
Komatsuzaki M, Ohta H (2007) Soil management practices for sustainable agro-ecosystems. Sustain Sci 2: 103-120. doi: 10.1007/s11625-006-0014-5
![]() |
[25] |
Steenwerth KL, Hodson AK, Bloom AJ, et al. (2014) Climate-smart agriculture global research agenda: scientific basis for action. Agric Food Sec 3:11. doi: 10.1186/2048-7010-3-11
![]() |
[26] |
Calleja-Cervantes ME, Fernández-González AJ, Irigoyen I, et al. (2015) Thirteen years of continued application of composted organic wastes in a vineyard modify soil quality characteristics. Soil Biol Biochem 90: 241-259. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.07.002
![]() |
[27] |
Diacono M, Montemurro F (2010) Long-term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30: 401-422. doi: 10.1051/agro/2009040
![]() |
[28] |
Bastida F, Selevsek N, Torres IF, et al. (2015) Soil restoration with organic amendments: linking cellular functionality and ecosystem processes. Sci Rep 5: 15550. doi: 10.1038/srep15550
![]() |
[29] |
Nkoa K (2014) Agricultural benefits and environmental risks of soil fertilization with anaerobic digestates: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 34: 473-492. doi: 10.1007/s13593-013-0196-z
![]() |
[30] |
Antolin MC, Pascaul I, Garcia C, et al. (2005) Growth, yield and solute content of barley in soils treated with sewage sludge under semiarid Mediterranean conditions. Field Crops Res 94: 224-237. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.009
![]() |
[31] |
Debiase G, Montemurro F, Fioreb A, et al. (2016) Organic amendment and minimum tillage in winter wheat grown in Mediterranean conditions: Effects on yield performance, soil fertility and environmental impact. Eur J Agron 75: 149-157. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2015.12.009
![]() |
[32] |
Marron N (2015) Agronomic and environmental effects of land application of residues in short-rotation tree plantations: a literature review. Biomass Bioenerg 81: 378-400. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.07.025
![]() |
[33] | Scotti R, Bonanomi G, Scelza R, et al. (2015) Organic amendments as sustainable tool to recovery fertility in intensive agricultural systems. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 15: 333-352. |
[34] |
Scotti R, Pane C, Spaccini R, et al. (2016) On-farm compost: a useful tool to improve soil quality under intensive farming systems. Appl Soil Ecol 107: 13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.05.004
![]() |
[35] | Hernandez MT, Mataix-Solera J, Lichner L, et al. (2007) Assessing the microbiological, biochemical, soil-physical and hydrological effects of amelioration of degraded soils in semiarid Spain. Biologia, 62: 542-546. |
[36] | Zhang P, Wei T, Jia Z, et al. (2014) Effects of straw incorporation on soil organic matter and soil water-stable aggregates content in semiarid regions of Northwest China, PLoS ONE, 9: e92839. |
[37] |
Plaza C, Hernández D, García-Gil JC, et al. (2004) Microbial activity in pig slurry-amended soils under semiarid conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 36: 1577-1585. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.07.017
![]() |
[38] |
Tejada M, Hernández T, García C (2009) Soil restoration using composted plant residues: Effects on soil properties. Soil Till Res 102: 109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2008.08.004
![]() |
[39] |
Ros M, García C, Hernández MT (2007) Pig slurry composts as substitute for mineral fertlizers in horticultural crops. effects on soil characteristics. Renew Agric Food Syst 22: 1-9. doi: 10.1017/S1742170507001500
![]() |
[40] | Garcia-Ruiz R, Gomez-Munoz B, Hatch DJ, et al. (2012) Soil mineral N retention and N2O emissions following combined application of 15N-labelled fertiliser and weed residues. Rapid Commun Mass Sp 26: 2379-2385. |
[41] |
Hernández MT, Chocano C, Moreno JL, et al. (2014) Towards a more sustainable fertilization: Combined use of compost and inorganic fertilization for tomato cultivation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 196: 178-184. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.07.006
![]() |
[42] | Baldi E, Toselli M, Marangoni B (2010) Organic fertilization leads to increased peach root production and lifespan. Tree Physiol 11: 1373-1382. |
[43] |
Eghball B (2000) Nitrogen mineralization from field-applied beef cattle feedlot manure or compost. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64: 2024-2030. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2000.6462024x
![]() |
[44] |
Basso B, Ritchie JT (2005) Impact of compost, manure and inorganic fertilizer on nitrate leaching and yield for a 6-year maize–alfalfa rotation in Michigan. Agric Ecosyst Environ 108: 329-341. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.01.011
![]() |
[45] |
Rathod DD, Rathod PH, Patel KP (2013) Integrated use of organic and inorganic inputs in wheat-fodder maize cropping sequence to improve crop yields and soil properties. Arch Agron Soil Sci 59: 1439-1455. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2012.724171
![]() |
[46] | Hirzel J, Salazar F (2011) Uso de enmiendas orgánicas como Fuente de fertilización en cultivos. Fertilización de cultivos en Chile. In: Hirzel, J., Ed., Colección libros INIA, Nº 28. Chillán 2011. |
[47] | Perez-Romero LF, Arroyo F, Santamaria C, et al. (2014) Growth, phenology and fruit set of Prunus armeniaca L. (cv. Ninfa) grafted on two rootstocks in organic and conventional management. Hort Sci 41: 101-106. |
[48] |
Lal R (2003) Soil erosion and the global carbon budget. Environ Int 29: 437-450. doi: 10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00192-7
![]() |
[49] | Kizilkaya K, Bayrakli B (2005) Effects of N-enriched sewage sludge on soil enzyme activities. Appl Soil Ecol 30: 192-202. |
[50] |
Carlson J, Saxena J, Basta N, et al. (2015) Application of organic amendments to restore degraded soil: effects on soil microbial properties. Environ Monit Assess 187: 109. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4293-0
![]() |
[51] | US EPA (2007) The use of soil amendments for remediation, revitalization and reuse. Available form: http://www.epa.gov. |
[52] |
O'Connor GA, Elliott NT, Basta RK, et al. (2005) Sustainable Land Application. J Environ Qual 34: 7-17. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0007
![]() |
[53] |
Pascual JA, Garcia C, Hernandez T (1999) Lasting microbiological and biochemical effects of the addition of municipal solid waste on an arid soil. Biol Fert Soils 30: 1-6. doi: 10.1007/s003740050579
![]() |
[54] | Otten L (2001) Wet-dry composting of organic municipal solid waste: current status in Canada. Can J Civil Eng 28: 124-130. |
[55] |
Wolkowski RP (2003) Nitrogen management considerations for land spreading municipal solid waste compost. J Environ Qual 32: 1844-1850. doi: 10.2134/jeq2003.1844
![]() |
[56] | Khalil AI, Hassouna MS, El-Ashqar HMA, et al. (2011) Changes in physical, chemical and microbial parameters during the composting of municipal sewage sludge. World J Microb Biot 26: 2117-2122. |
[57] | Wu D, Liu P, Luo Y, et al. (2010) Nitrogen transformations during co-composting of herbal residues, spent mushrooms, and sludge. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B Biomed Biotechnol 11: 497-505. |
[58] | Soumaré M, FMG Tack, MG Verloo (2003) Effects of a municipal solid waste compost and mineral fertilization on plant growth in two tropical agricultural soils of Mali. Bioresour Technol 86: 15-20. |
[59] |
García-Gil JC, Plaza C, Soler-Rovira P, et al. (2000) Long-term effects of municipal solid waste compost application on soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass. Soil Biol Biochem 32: 1907-1913. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00165-6
![]() |
[60] |
Tejada M, Gonzalez JL, García-Martínez AM, et al. (2008) Application of a green manure and green manure composted with beet vinasse on soil restoration: Effects on soil properties. Bioresour Technol 99: 4949-4957. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.026
![]() |
[61] |
García-Martínez AM, Diaz A, Tejada M, et al. (2010) Enzymatic production of an organic soil biostimulant from wheat-condensed distiller solubles: Effects on soil biochemistry and biodiversity. Process Biochem 45: 1127-1133. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2010.04.005
![]() |
[62] |
Parrado J, Bautista J, Romero EJ, et al. (2008) Production of a carob enzymatic extract: potential use as a biofertilizer. Bioresour Technol 99: 2312-2318. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.05.029
![]() |
[63] |
Parrado J, Escudero ML, Friaza V (2007) Enzymatic vegetable extract with bio-active components: influence of fertiliser on the color and anthocyanins of red grapes. J Sci Food Agric 87: 2310-2318. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2989
![]() |
[64] |
Tejada M, Benítez C, Gómez I, et al. (2011) Use of biostimulants on soil restoration: Effects on soil biochemical properties and microbial community. App Soil Ecol 49: 11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.07.009
![]() |
[65] |
García C, Hernández T, Costa F (1994) Microbial activity in soils under Mediterranean environmental conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 26: 1185-1191. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(94)90142-2
![]() |
[66] |
Prayogo C, Jones JE, Baeyens J, et al. (2014) Impact of biochar on mineralisation of C and N from soil and willow litter and its relationship with microbial community biomass and structure. Biol Fert Soils 50: 695-702. doi: 10.1007/s00374-013-0884-5
![]() |
[67] | Mankasingh U, Choi PC, Ragnarsdottir V (2009) Biochar application in Tamil Nadu and the global food crisis. In Goldschmitdt Conference-Challenges to our Volatile Planet, in Davos (Switzerland), Jun 21-26. |
[68] |
Singh R, Babu JN, Kumar R, et al. (2015) Multifaceted application of crop residue biochar as a tool for sustainable agricultura: en ecological perspective. Ecol Eng 77: 324-347. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.01.011
![]() |
[69] | Uchimiya M, Lima IM, Thomas Klasson K, et al. (2010) Immobilization of heavy metal ions (Cu II, Cd II, Ni II, and Pb II) by broiler litter-derived biochars in water and soil. J Agric Food Chem 58: 5538-5544. |
[70] |
Kuppusamy S, Thavamani P, Megharaj M, et al. (2016) Agronomic and remedial benefits and risks of applying biochar to soil: Current knowledge and future research directions. Environ Int 87: 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.10.018
![]() |
[71] | Novak J, Lima I, Xing B (2009) Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on a loamy sand. Annals Environ Sci 3: 195-206. |
[72] |
Laird D, Fleming P, Wang B, et al. (2010) Biochar impact on nutrient leaching from a Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158: 436-442. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.05.012
![]() |
[73] |
Chen J, Liu X, Zheng J, et al. (2013) Biochar soil amendment increased bacterial but decreased fungal gene abundance with shifts in community structure in a slightly acid rice paddy from Southwest China. Appl Soil Ecol 71: 33-44. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.05.003
![]() |
[74] |
Jindo K, Sánchez-Monedero MA, Hernández T, et al. (2012) Biochar influences the microbial community structure during manure composting with agricultural wastes. Sci Total Environ 416: 476-481. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.12.009
![]() |
[75] |
Khodadad CL, Zimmerman AR, Green SJ, et al. (2011) Taxa-specific changes in soil microbial community composition induced by pyrogenic carbon amendments. Soil Biol Biochem 43: 385-392. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.11.005
![]() |
[76] |
Grossman JM, O´Neil BE, Tsai SM, et al. (2010) Amazonian anthrosols support similar microbial communities that differ distinctly from those extant in adjacent, unmodified soils of the same mineralogy. Microb Ecol 60: 192-205. doi: 10.1007/s00248-010-9689-3
![]() |
[77] |
Nicolás C, Hernández T, García C (2012) Organic amendments as strategy to increase organic matter in particle-size fractions of a semi-arid soil. Appl Soil Ecol 57: 50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.02.018
![]() |
[78] |
Lal R (2003) Soil erosion and the global carbon budget. Environ Int 29: 337-450. doi: 10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00166-6
![]() |
[79] | Krull ES, Skjemstad JO, Baldock JA (2004) Functions of soil organic matter and the effect on soil properties. In Residue, Soil Organic Carbon and Crop Performance, CSIRO Land and Water, PMB2, Glen Osmond SA 5064. GRDC Project No CSO 00029. |
[80] |
Zimmerman M, Leifeld J, Smchmidt MWI, et al. (2007) Measured soil organic matter fractions can be related to pools in the Roth C model. Eur J Soil Sci 58: 658-667. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00855.x
![]() |
[81] |
García-Franco N, Martínez-Mena M, Goberna, M, et al. (2015) Changes in soil aggregation and microbial community structure control carbon sequestration after afforestation of semiarid shrublands. Soil Biol Biochem 87: 110-121. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.04.012
![]() |
[82] |
García C, Hernández T, Roldán A, et al. (2002) Effect of plant cover decline on chemical microbiological parameters under Mediterranean climate. Soil Biol Biochem 34: 635-642. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00225-5
![]() |
[83] | Cerdà A, González-Pelayo O, Giménez-Morera A, et al. (2016) The use of barley straw residues to avoid high erosion and runoff rates on persimmon plantations in Eastern Spain under low frequency-high magnitude simulated rainfall events. Soil Res 54: 154-165. |
[84] |
Garcia C, Hernandez T, Costa F (1992) Variation in some chemical parameters and organic matter in soils regenerated by the addition of municipal solid-waste. Environ Manag 16: 763-768. doi: 10.1007/BF02645666
![]() |
[85] |
Pascual JA, García C, Hernández T, et al. (1997) Changes in the microbial activity of an arid soil amended with urban organic wastes. Biol Fertil Soils 24: 429-434. doi: 10.1007/s003740050268
![]() |
[86] |
Bastida F, Moreno JL, Garcia C, et al. (2007) Addition of urban waste to semiarid degraded soil: Long-term effect. Pedosphere 17: 557-567. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(07)60066-6
![]() |
[87] |
García-Díaz A, Allas RB, Gristina L, et al. (2016) Carbon input threshold for soil carbon budget optimization in eroding vineyards. Geoderma 271: 144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.02.020
![]() |
[88] | Bastida F, Hernandez T, Albaladejo J, et al. (2013) Phylogenetic and functional changes in the microbial community of long-term restored soils under semiarid climate. Soil Biol Biochem 65, 12-21. |
[89] | Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control (IPPC). |
[90] |
Agnello AC, Huguenot D, Van Hullebusch ED, et al. (2014) Enhanced phytoremediation: A review of low molecular weight organic acids and surfactants used as amendments. Crit Rev Env Sci Tec 44: 2531-2576. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2013.829764
![]() |
[91] |
Wilcke W (2007) Global patterns of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil. Geoderma 141: 157-166. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.07.007
![]() |
[92] | Boitsov S, Jensen HKB, Klungsøyr J (2009) Natural background and anthropogenic inputs of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in sediments of South-Western Barents Sea Mar. Environ Res 68: 236-245. |
[93] |
Joner EJ, Johansen A, Loibner AP, et al. (2001) Rhizosphere effects on microbial community structure and dissipation and toxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in spiked soil. Environ Sci Technol 35: 2773-2777. doi: 10.1021/es000288s
![]() |
[94] | Haritash AK, Kaushik CP (2009) Biodegradation aspects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): A review. J Hazard Mater 169: 1-15. |
[95] | Thapa B, Kumar KCA, Ghimire A (2012) A review on bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants in soil. Kathmandu Univ. J Sci Eng Technol 8: 164-170. |
[96] |
Kanaly RA, Harayama S (2010) Advances in the field of high-molecular weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon biodegradation by bacteria. Microb Biotechnol 3: 136-164. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2009.00130.x
![]() |
[97] | Loick N, Hobbs PJ, Hale MCD, et al. (2012) Bioremediation of poly-aromatic hyrdocarbon (PAH)-contaminated Soil by Composting. Crit Rev Env Sci Tec 39: 271-332. |
[98] |
García-Delgado C, D'Annibale A, Pesciaroli L, et al. (2015) Implications of polluted soil biostimulation and bioaugmentation with spent mushroom substrate (Agaricus bisporus) on the microbial community and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons biodegradation. Sci Tot Environ 508: 20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.046
![]() |
[99] |
Kästner M, Miltner A (2016) Application of compost for effective bioremediation of organic contaminants and pollutants in soil. Appl Microbiol Biot 100: 3433-3449. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7378-y
![]() |
[100] |
Gan S, Lau EV, Ng HK (2009) Remediation of soils contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). J Hazar Mater 172: 532-539. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.118
![]() |
[101] | Samantha L Clay (2014) Identifying the fate of petroleum hydrocarbons released into the environment and their potential biodegradation using stable carbon isotopes and microbial lipid analysis. (Thesis) Master, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario. |
[102] | Ros M, Rodríguez I, García C, et al. (2010) Microbial communities involved in the bioremediation of an aged recalcitrant hydrocarbon polluted soil by using organic amendments. Bioresour Technol 101:6916-6923. |
[103] | Said-Pullicino D, Gigliotti G, Vella AJ (2004) Environmental fate of triasulfuron in soils amended with municipal waste compost. J Environ Qual 33: 1743-1751. |
[104] | Purnomo AS, Mori T, KameiI N, et al. (2010) Application of mushroom waste medium from Pleurotus ostreatusfor bioremediation of DDT-contaminated soil. Int Biodeter Biodegr 64: 397-402. |
[105] |
Jaspers CJ, Ewbank G, McCarthy AJ, et al. (2002) Successive rapid reductive dehalogenation and mineralization of pentachlorophenol by the indigenous microflora of farmyard manure compost. J Appl Microb 92: 127-133. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01520.x
![]() |
[106] |
Wang H, Brown SL, Magesan GN, et al. (2008) Technological options for the management of biosolids. Environ Sci Pollut Res 15: 308-317. doi: 10.1007/s11356-008-0012-5
![]() |
[107] |
Guerrero C, Gomez I, Moral P, et al. (2001) Reclamation of a burned forest soil with municipal waste compost: macronutrient dynamic and improved vegetation cover recovery. Bioresour Technol 76: 221-227. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00125-5
![]() |
[108] |
Juwarkar AA, Jambhulkar HP (2008) Phytoremediation of coal mine spoil dump through integrated biotechnological approach. Bioresour Technol 99: 4732-4741. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.060
![]() |
[109] |
Kumar GP, Yadav SK, Thawle PR, et al. (2008). Growth of Jatropha curcas onmetal contaminated soil amended with industrial wastes and Azotobacter-a greenhouse study. Bioresour Technol 99: 2078-2082. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.032
![]() |
[110] | Chiochetta CG, Cotelle S, Masfaraud JF, et al. (2016) Use of agro-industrial organic sludge amendment to remediate degraded soil: chemical and eco(geno)toxicological differences between fresh and stabilized sludge and establishment of application rates. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 23: 3018-3025. |
[111] |
Bianchi V, Masciandaro G, Giraldi D, et al. (2008) Enhanced heavy metal phytoextraction from marine dredged sediments comparing conventional chelating agents (Citric Acid and EDTA) with Humic Substances. Water Air Soil Pollut 193: 323-333. doi: 10.1007/s11270-008-9693-0
![]() |
[112] | EEA environmental statement (2007) EMAS (with data from 2006). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. ISSN 1725-9851, ISBN 978-92-9167-936-2. |
[113] | Jiménez-Cárceles FJ, Egea C, Rodríguez-Caparrós AB, et al. (2006) Contents of nitrogen, ammonium, phosphorus, pesticides and heavy metals, in a salt marsh in the coast of the Mar Menor lagoon (SE Spain). Fresenius Environ Bull 15: 370-378. |
[114] | Hseu Z, Su SW, Yu HY, et al. (2010) Remediation techniques and heavy metal uptake by different rice varieties in metal‐contaminated soils of Taiwan: New aspects for food safety regulation and sustainable agriculture. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 5: 31-52. |
[115] | Pardo Martínez-Fernández D, Clemente R, Walker DJ, et al. (2013) The use of olive-mill waste compost to promote the plant vegetation cover in a trace-element-contaminated soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21: 1029-1038. |
[116] | He Z, Shentu J, Yang X, et al. (2015) Heavy metal contamination of soils: sources, indicators, and assessment. J Environ Indic 9:17-18. |
[117] | Salt DE, Smith RD, Raskin L (1998) Phytoremediation. Ann Rev Plant Phys Plant Mol Biol 49: 643-668. |
[118] |
Doni S, Macci C, Peruzzi E, et al. (2015) Heavy metal distribution in a sediment phytoremediation system at pilot scale. Ecol Eng 81: 146-157. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.049
![]() |
[119] |
Hueso-González P, Martínez-Murillo JF, Ruiz-Sinoga JDM (2014) The impact of organic amendments on forest soil properties under Mediterranean climatic conditions. Land Degrad Dev 25: 604-612. doi: 10.1002/ldr.2296
![]() |
[120] | Paz-Ferreiro J, Lu H, Fu S, et al. (2013) Use of phytoremediation and biochar to remediate heavy metal polluted soils: a review. Solid Earth Discuss 5: 2155-2179. |
[121] |
Luna L, Pastorelli R, Bastida F, et al. (2016) The combination of quarry restoration strategies in semiarid climate induces different responses in biochemical and microbiological soil properties. Appl Soil Ecol 107: 33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.05.006
![]() |
[122] |
Lakhdar A, Rabhi M, Ghnaya T, et al. (2009) Effectiveness of compost use in salt-affected soil. J Hazar Mater 171: 29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.132
![]() |
[123] |
Bhattacharyya R, Kundu S, Prakash V, et al. (2008) Sustainability under combined application of mineral and organic fertilizers in a rainfed soybean-wheat system of the Indian Himalayas. Eur J Agron 28: 33-46. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2007.04.006
![]() |
[124] |
Manna MC, Swarup A, Wanjari RH, et al. (2005) Long-term effect of fertilizer and manure application on soil organic carbon storage, soil quality and yield sustainability under sub-humid and semi-arid tropical India. Field Crops Res 93: 264-280. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2004.10.006
![]() |
[125] |
Ros M, Hernández MT, García C (2003) Soil microbial activity after restoration of a semiarid soil by organic amendments. Soil Biol Biochem 35: 463-469. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00298-5
![]() |
[126] |
Garg RN, Pathak H, Das DK, et al. (2005) Use of fly ash and biogas slurry for improving wheat yield and physical properties of the soil. Environ Monit Assess 107: 1-9. doi: 10.1007/s10661-005-2021-x
![]() |
[127] | Ramulu US (2001) Reuse of municipal sewage and sludge in agriculture. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, India. |
[128] | Parkpain PS, Sirisukhodom AA, Carbonell‐Barrachina (1998) Heavy metals and nutrients chemistry in sewage sludge amended Thai soils. Toxic/Hazar Subst Environ Eng 33: 4573-597. |
[129] |
Albiach R, Canet R, Pomares F, et al. (2001) Organic matter components and aggregate stability after the application of different amendments to a horticultural soil. Bioresour Technol 76: 125-129. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00090-0
![]() |
[130] | Annabi M, Houot S, Francou C, et al. (2006) Improvement of aggregate stability after urban compost addition in a silty soil, in: Kraft E, Bidlingmaier W, de Bertoldi M, et al. Author, Biological Waste Management, From Local to Global, Proceedings of the International Conference ORBIT2006 /Eckhard Kraft.(Hrsg.) Weimar: Verlag ORBITe.V |
[131] |
Blanchet G, Gavazov K, Bragazza L, et al. (2016) Responses of soil properties and crop yields to different inorganic and organic amendments in a Swiss conventional farming system. Agric Ecosyst Environ 230: 116-126. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.05.032
![]() |
[132] |
Jiang MB, Wang XH, Liusui YH, et al. (2017) Variation of soil aggregation and intra-aggregate carbon by long-term fertilization with aggregate formation in a grey desert soil. Catena 149: 437-445. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2016.10.021
![]() |
[133] | Peikert B, Schaumann GE, Bibus D, et al. (2017) Effects of olive oil mill wastewater on chemical, microbiological, and physical properties of soil incubated under four different climatic conditions. Biol Fert Soils: 53, 89-102. |
[134] | Van-Camp L, Bujarrabal B, Gentile AR, et al. (2004) Reports of the Technical Working Groups Established under the Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. |
[135] |
Garcia C, Hernandez T, Albaladejo J (1998) Revegetation in semiarid zones: influence of terracing and organic refuse on microbial activity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62: 670-76. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200030018x
![]() |
[136] | Bastida F, Torres IF, Hernández T, et al. (2013) Can the labile carbon contribute to carbon immobilization in semiarid soils? Priming effects and microbial community dynamics. Soil Biol Biochem 57: 892-902. |
[137] |
Tejada M, Moreno JL, Hernández MT, et al. (2007) Application of two beet vinasse forms in soil restoration: Effects on soil properties in and environment in southern Spain. Agric Ecosyst Environ 119: 289-298. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.07.019
![]() |
[138] |
Kiem R, Kögel-Knabner I (2003) Contribution of lignin and polysaccharides to the refractory carbon pool in C-depleted arable soils. Soil Biol Biochem 35: 101-118. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00242-0
![]() |
[139] |
Abiven S, Menasseri S, Chenu C (2009) The effects of organic inputs over time on soil aggregate stability-A literature analysis. Soil Biol Biochem 41: 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.09.015
![]() |
[140] |
Gentile R, Vanlauwe B, Six J (2011) Litter quality impacts short-but not long-term soil carbon dynamics in soil aggregate fractions. Ecol Appl 21: 695-703. doi: 10.1890/09-2325.1
![]() |
[141] |
García E, García C, Hernández T (2012) Evaluation of the suitability of using large amounts of urban wastes for degraded arid soil restoration and C fixation. Eur J Soil Sci 63: 650-658. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2012.01472.x
![]() |
[142] |
Bhattacharya SS, Ki-Hyun K, Das S, et al. (2016) A review on the role of organic inputs in maintaining the soil carbon pool of the terrestrial ecosystem. J Environ Manage 167: 214-227. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.042
![]() |
[143] |
Alburquerque JA, de la Fuente C, Bernal MP (2011) Improvement of soil quality after "alperujo" compost application to two contaminated soils characterised by differing heavy metal solubility. J Environ Manage 92: 733-741. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.018
![]() |
[144] | Heidari G, Mohammadi K, Sohrabi Y (2016) Responses of soil microbial biomass and enzyme activities to tillage and fertilization systems in soybean (Glycine max L.) Production. Front Plant Sci 7: 1730. |
[145] |
Fontaine S, Mariotti A, Abbadie L (2003) The priming effect of organic matter: a question of microbial competition? Soil Biol Biochem 35: 837-843. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00123-8
![]() |
[146] |
Kuzyakov Y, Friedel JK, Stahr K (2000) Review of mechanism and quantification of priming effects. Soil Biol Biochem 32: 1485-1498. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00084-5
![]() |
[147] |
Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y (2008) Mechanisms of real and apparent priming effects and their dependence on soil microbial biomass and community structure: critical review. Biol Fert Soils 45: 115-131. doi: 10.1007/s00374-008-0334-y
![]() |
[148] |
Saison C, Degrange V, Oliver R, et al. (2006) Alteration and resilience of the soil microbial community following compost amendment: effects of compost level and compost-borne microbial community. Environ Microb 8: 247-257. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00892.x
![]() |
[149] |
Ondoño S, Bastida F, Moreno JL (2014) Microbiological and biochemical properties of artificial substrates: A preliminary study of its application as Technosols or as a basis in Green Roof Systems. Ecol Eng 70: 189-199. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.05.003
![]() |
[150] |
Kandeler E, Tscherko D, Bruce KD, et al. (2000) Structure and function of the soil microbial community in microhabitats of a heavy metal polluted soil. Biol Fertil Soils 32: 390-400. doi: 10.1007/s003740000268
![]() |
[151] |
Pascual JA, García C, Hernández T, et al, (2000) Soil microbial activity as a biomarker of degradation and remediation processes. Soil Biol Biochem 32: 1877-1883. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00161-9
![]() |
[152] | Alguacil MM, Díaz-Pereira E, Caravaca F, et al. (2009) Increased diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a long-term field experiment via application of organic amendments to a semiarid degraded soil. Appl Environ Microb 75: 4254-4263. |
[153] |
Fierer N, Jackson RB (2006) The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. P Nat Acad Sci USA 103: 626-631. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507535103
![]() |
[154] | Acosta-Martínez V, Dowd S, Sun Y, et al. (2008) Tag-encoded pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial diversity in a single soil type as affected by management and land use. Soil Biol Biochem 40: 2762-2770. |
[155] |
Oren A, Steinberger Y (2008) Catabolic profiles of soil fungal communities along a geographic climatic gradient in Israel. Soil Biol Biochem 40: 2578-2587. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.024
![]() |
[156] |
Goberna M, Navarro-Cano JA, Valiente-Nauet A, et al. (2014) Abiotic stress tolerance and competition-related traits underlie phylogenetic clustering in soil bacterial communities. Ecol Lett 17: 1191-1201. doi: 10.1111/ele.12341
![]() |
[157] |
Chaudhry V, Rehman A, Mishra A, et al. (2012) Changes in bacterial community structure of agricultural land due to long-term organic and chemical amendments. Microb Ecol 64: 450-460. doi: 10.1007/s00248-012-0025-y
![]() |
[158] |
Ben-David EA, Zaady E, Sher Y, et al. (2011) Assessment of the spatial distribution of soil microbial communities in patchy arid and semi-arid landscapes of the Negev Desert using combined PLFA and DGGE analyses. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 76: 492-503. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01075.x
![]() |
[159] | Kuske CR, Ticknor LO, Miller ME, et al. (2002) Comparison of soil bacteria communities in rizhospheres of three plant species and the interspaces in an arid grassland. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 1854-1863. |
[160] |
Hortal S, Bastida F, Armas C, et al. (2013) Soil microbial community under a nurse-plant species changes in composition, biomass and activity as the nurse grows. Soil Biol Biochem 64: 139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.04.018
![]() |
[161] | Angel R, Soares MIM, Ungar E, et al. (2010) Biogeography of soil archaea and bacteria along a steep precipitation gradient. The ISME Journal 4: 553-563. |
[162] |
Neilson JW, Quade J, Ortiz M, et al. (2012) Life at the hyperarid margin: novel bacterial diversity in arid soils of the Atacama Desert, Chile. Extremophiles 16: 553. doi: 10.1007/s00792-012-0454-z
![]() |
[163] | Connon SA, Lester ED, Shafaat HS, et al. (2007). Bacterial diversity in hyperarid Atacama desert soils. J Geophys Res: Biogeosciences 112. |
[164] |
Drees KP, Nielson JW, Betancourt JL, et al. (2006) Bacterial community structure in the hyperarid core of the Atacama Desert, Chile. Appl Environ Microb 72: 7902-7908. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01305-06
![]() |
[165] |
Fontaine S, Bardoux G, Abbadie L, et al. (2004) Carbon input to soil may decrease soil carbon content. Ecol Lett 7: 314-320. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00579.x
![]() |
[166] | Senesi N, Plaza C (2007) Role of humification processes in recycling organic wastes of various nature and sources as organic amendments. Clean 35: 26-41. |
[167] | Schnitzer M, Monreal CM (2011) Quo vadis soil organic matter research? A biological link to the chemistry of humification. In: Sparks DL Author, Advances in Agronomy, Burlington: Academic Press, 139-213. |
[168] | Singh J, Kalamdhad AS (2012) Reduction of heavy metals during composting-A review. Int J Environ Protect 2: 36-43. |
[169] | Plaza C, Senesi N (2009) The effect of organic matter amendment on native soil humic substances. In: Senesi PM, Huang XB Author, Biophysico-Chemical Processes Involving Natural Nonliving Organic Matter in Environmental System. Hoboken: Wiley & Sons, 147-181. |
[170] |
Bernal MP, Alburquerque JM, Moral R (2009) Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment-a review. Bioresour Technol 100: 5444-5453. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.027
![]() |
[171] |
Larney FJ, Hao X (2007) A review of composting as a management alternative for beef cattle feedlot manure in southern Alberta, Canada. Bioresour Technol 98: 3221-3227. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.07.005
![]() |
[172] |
Medina J, Monreal C, Barea JM, et al. (2015) Crop residue stabilization and application to agricultural and degraded soils: A review. Waste Manage 42: 41-54. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.04.002
![]() |
[173] |
Lynch DH, Voroney RP, Warman PR (2006) Use of 13C and 15N natural abundance techniques to characterize carbon and nitrogen dynamics in composting and in compost-amended soils. Soil Biol Biochem 38: 103-114. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.04.022
![]() |
[174] |
Walter I, Martinez F, Cuevas G (2006) Plant and soil responses to the application of composted MSW in a degraded, semiarid shrubland in central Spain. Compost Sci Util 14: 147-154. doi: 10.1080/1065657X.2006.10702276
![]() |
[175] | Tittarelli F, Petruzzelli G, Pezzarossa B, et al. (2007) Quality and agronomic use of compost, in: Diaz LF, de Bertoldi M, Bidlingmaier W, et al. Author, Compost science and technology, Waste management, Elsevier Ltd., 119-145. |
[176] |
Zhang M, Heaney D, Henriquez B, et al. (2006) A four year study on influence of biosolids/MSW compost application in less productive soils in Alberta: nutrient dynamics. Compost Sci Util 14: 68-80. doi: 10.1080/1065657X.2006.10702265
![]() |
[177] | Fernández-Getino AP, Pérez J, Albarrán MM, et al. (2012) Restoration of abandoned, degraded agricultural soil using composted biosolid: Influence on selected soil properties. Arid Land Res Manage 26: 200-210. |
[178] |
Fabrizio A, Tambone F, Genevini P (2009) Effect of compost application rate on carbon degradation and retention in soils. Waste Manage 29: 174-179. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.010
![]() |
[179] |
Ryals R, Silver WL (2013) Effects of organic matter amendments on net primary productivity and greenhouse gas emissions in annual grasslands. Ecol Appl 23: 46-69. doi: 10.1890/12-0620.1
![]() |
[180] |
Kätterer T, Börjesson G, Kirchmann H (2014) Changes in organic carbon in topsoil and subsoil and microbial community composition caused by repeated additions of organic amendments and N fertilisation in a long-term field experiment in Sweden. Agric Ecosyst Environ 189:110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.025
![]() |
[181] |
Macías F, Camps-Arbestain M (2010) Soil carbon sequestration in a changing global environment. Mitig Adapt Strat Gl 15: 511-529. doi: 10.1007/s11027-010-9231-4
![]() |
[182] |
Rovira P, Vallejo VR (2002) Mineralization of carbon and nitrogen from plant debris, as affected by debris size and depth of burial. Soil Biol Biochem 34: 327-339. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00186-9
![]() |
[183] |
Don A, Roedenbeck C, Gleixner G (2013) Unexpected control of soil carbon turnover by soil carbon concentration. Environ Chem Letters 11: 407-413. doi: 10.1007/s10311-013-0433-3
![]() |
[184] |
Odlare M, Pell M, Svensson K (2008) Changes in soil chemical and microbiological properties during 4 years of application of various organic residues. Waste Manage 28: 1246-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.06.005
![]() |
[185] |
Wienhold BJ, Andrews SS, Karlen DL (2004) Soil quality: a review of the science and experiences in the USA. Environ Geochem Health 26: 89-95. doi: 10.1023/B:EGAH.0000039571.59640.3c
![]() |
[186] |
Ge Y, Changrong C, Zhihong X, et al. (2010) Carbon/nitrogen ratio as a major factor for predicting the effects of organic wastes on soil bacterial communities assessed by DNA-based molecular techniques. Environ Sci Pollut R 17: 807-815. doi: 10.1007/s11356-009-0185-6
![]() |
[187] |
Alburquerque JA, de la Fuente C, Ferre-Costa A, et al. (2012) Assessment of the fertiliser potential of digestates from farm and agro-industrial residues. Biomass Bioenergy 40: 181-189. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.02.018
![]() |
[188] |
Watcharasukarn M, Kaparaju P, Steyer JP, et al. (2009) Screening Escherichia coli, Enteroccocus faecalis, and Clostridium perfringens as indicator organisms in evaluating pathogen-reducing capacity in biogas plants. Microb Ecol 58: 221-230. doi: 10.1007/s00248-009-9497-9
![]() |
[189] | Boydston RA, Collins HP, Vaughn SF (2008) Response of weeds and ornamental plants to potting soil amended with dried distillers grains. Hort Sci 43: 191-195. |
[190] | Kulling D, Stadelmann F, Herter U (2001) Sewage Sludge-Fertilizer or Waste? UKWIR Conference, Brussels. |
[191] |
Lopez-Mosquera ME, Moiron C, Carral E (2000) Use of dairy industry sludge as fertilizer for grassland in northwest Spain: heavy metal levels in the soil and plants. Resour Conserv Recy 30: 95-109. doi: 10.1016/S0921-3449(00)00058-6
![]() |
[192] | Spencer JL, Guan J (2004) Public health implications related to spread of pathogens in manure from livestock and poultry operations. In: Spencer JFT, Ragout de Spencer AL Author, Public health microbiology: methods and protocols. Humana, Totowa, 503-515. |
[193] | Hutchison ML, Walters LD, Avery SM, et al. (2005) Analysis of livestock production, waste storage, and pathogen levels and prevalences in farm manures. Appl Environ Microb 71: 1231-1236. |
[194] |
Bicudo JR, Goyal SM (2003) Pathogens and manure management systems: a review. Environ Technol 24: 115-130. doi: 10.1080/09593330309385542
![]() |
[195] |
Masse D, Gilbert Y, Topp E (2011) Pathogen removal in farm-scale psychrophilic anaerobic digesters processing swine manure. Bioresour Technol 102: 641-646. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.020
![]() |
[196] | Angelidaki I, Ellegaard L, Ahring BK (2003) Applications of the anaerobic digestion process. In: Ahring BK Author, Biomethanation II. Berlin: Springer, 1-33. |
[197] | Slana I, Pribylova R, Kralova A, et al. (2011) Persistence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. Paratubercolosis at a farm-scale biogas plant supplied with manure from paratuberculosis-affected dairy cattle. Appl Environ Microb 77: 3115-3119. |
[198] |
Schnurer A, Schnurer J (2006) Fungal survival during anaerobic digestion of organic household waste. Waste Manage 26: 1205-1211. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.09.007
![]() |
[199] | Council Directive 86/278/EEC of 12 June 1986 on the protection of the environment, and in particular of the soil, when sewage sludge is used in agriculture. |
[200] |
Eldridge SM, Chan KY, Barchia I, et al. (2009) A comparison of surface applied granulated biosolids and poultry litter in terms of risk to runoff water quality on turf farms in Western Sydney, Australia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 134: 243-250. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.07.007
![]() |
[201] | Navarro-Pedreño J, Almendro-Candel MB, Jordán-Vidal MM, et al. (2004) Risk areas in the application of sewage sludge on degraded soils in Alicante province (Spain). In: Martin JF, Brebbia CA, Godfrey AE, et al. Author, Geo-Environment. Southampton: WIT Press, 293-302. |
[202] | Lag-Brotons AJ, Soriano-Disla JM, Gómez I, et al. (2013) Saline irrigation effects on Cynara cardunculus L. plants grown in Mediterranean soils. Hort Sci 48: 762-767. |
[203] |
Cai H, Chen T, Liu H, et al. (2010) The effect of salinity and porosity of sewage sludge compost on the growth of vegetable seedlings. Sci Hortic 124: 381-386. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.01.009
![]() |
[204] |
Pérez-Gimeno A, Navarro-Pedreño J, Almendro-Candel MB, et al. (2016) Environmental consequences of the use of sewage sludge compost and limestone outcrop residue for soil restoration: salinity and trace elements pollution. J Soil Sediment 16: 1012-1021. doi: 10.1007/s11368-015-1288-y
![]() |
[205] |
Young I, Crawford J (2004) Interactions and self-organisation in the soil-microbe complex. Science 304: 1634-1637. doi: 10.1126/science.1097394
![]() |
[206] |
Dominati E, Mackay A, Green S, et al. (2014) A soil change-based methodology for the quantification and valuation of ecosystem services from agro-ecosystems: a case study of pastoral agriculture in New Zealand. Ecol Econ 100: 119-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.008
![]() |
[207] | Hewitt A, Dominati E, Webb T, et al. (2015) Soil natural capital quantification by the stock adequacy method. Geoderma 241-242: 107-114. |
[208] |
Mc Bratney A, Field DJ, Koch A (2014) The dimensions of soil security. Geoderma 213: 203-213. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.08.013
![]() |
[209] | Robinson DA, Hockley N, Dominati EJ, et al. (2012) Natural capital, ecosystem services and soil change: why soil science must embrace an ecosystems approach. Vadose Zone J 11: 1-21. |
[210] | Bouma J (2015) Reaching out from the soil-box in pursuit of soil security. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 61: 556-565. |
[211] |
Godfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR, et al. (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327: 812-818. doi: 10.1126/science.1185383
![]() |
[212] | Montgomery, HL (2010) How is soil made? Crabtree Publishing, New York. |
[213] |
Zhou P, Sheng H, Lia Y, et al. (2016) Lower C sequestration and N use efficiency by straw incorporation than manure amendment on paddy soils. Agric Ecosyst Environ 219: 93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.12.012
![]() |
[214] | Smith P, Fang C, Dawson JJC, et al. (2008) Impact of global warming on soil organic carbon. Adv Agron:97: 1-43. |
[215] |
Houghton RA (2007) Balancing the global carbon budget. Annu Rev Earth Pl Sc. Book Series. 35: 313-347. doi: 10.1146/annurev.earth.35.031306.140057
![]() |
[216] |
Six J, Frey SD, Thiet RK, et al. (2006) Bacterial and fungal contributions to carbon sequestration in agroecosystems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70: 555-569. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0347
![]() |
[217] |
Powlson D, Whitmore A, Goulding K (2011) Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: a critical re-examination to identify the true and the false. Eur J Soil Sci 62: 42-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01342.x
![]() |
[218] | Trasar-Ccepeda C, Leirós MC, Gil-Sotres F (2008) Hydrolytic enzyme activities in agricultural and forest soils. Some implications for their use as indicators of soil quality. Soil Biol Biochem 40: 2146-2155. |
[219] | Shaw LJ, Burns RG (2006) Enzyme activity profiles and soil quality. In: Bloem J, Hopkins DW, Benedetti A Author, Microbiological Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. CABI, Oxfordshire, IK, 158-182. |
[220] |
Davidson EA, Janssens IA (2006) Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature 440: 165-173. doi: 10.1038/nature04514
![]() |
[221] |
Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, et al. (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota-A review. Soil Biol Biochem 43: 1812-1836. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022
![]() |
[222] |
Montiel-Rozas MM, Panettieri M, Madejón, P, et al. (2016) Carbon sequestration in restored soils by applying organic amendments. Land Degrad Dev 27: 620-629. doi: 10.1002/ldr.2466
![]() |
[223] | Yazdanpanah N, Mahmoodabadi M, Cerdá A (2016) The impact of organic amendments on soil hydrology, structure and microbial respiration in semiarid lands. Geoderma 266: 58-65. |
1. | Danika Hill, Matthew J. Morra, Thibault Stalder, Sven Jechalke, Eva Top, Anne T. Pollard, Inna Popova, Dairy manure as a potential source of crop nutrients and environmental contaminants, 2021, 100, 10010742, 117, 10.1016/j.jes.2020.07.016 | |
2. | Seyedeh Mohadeseh Ehsani, Hamid Niknahad - Gharmakher, Javad Motamedi, Mousa Akbarlou, Esmaeil Sheidai - Karkaj, The Impact of Lignite and Wheat Straw Biochar Application on Structural Traits of Pot-Grown Nitraria Schoberi L. and Soil Properties, 2021, 0718-9508, 10.1007/s42729-021-00432-0 | |
3. | Arthur Prudêncio de Araujo Pereira, Lara Andrade Lucena Lima, Walderly Melgaço Bezerra, Mirella Leite Pereira, Leonardo Ribeiro Oliveira Normando, Lucas William Mendes, Jose Gerardo Beserra Oliveira, Ademir Sérgio Ferreira Araújo, Vânia Maria Maciel Melo, Grazing exclusion regulates bacterial community in highly degraded semiarid soils from the Brazilian Caatinga biome , 2021, 1085-3278, 10.1002/ldr.3893 | |
4. | María T. Gómez-Sagasti, Antonio Hernández, Unai Artetxe, Carlos Garbisu, José M. Becerril, How Valuable Are Organic Amendments as Tools for the Phytomanagement of Degraded Soils? The Knowns, Known Unknowns, and Unknowns, 2018, 2, 2571-581X, 10.3389/fsufs.2018.00068 | |
5. | Mukesh Kumar Awasthi, Surendra Sarsaiya, Steven Wainaina, Karthik Rajendran, Sumit Kumar, Wang Quan, Yumin Duan, Sanjeev Kumar Awasthi, Hongyu Chen, Ashok Pandey, Zengqiang Zhang, Archana Jain, Mohammad J. Taherzadeh, A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: Technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives, 2019, 111, 13640321, 115, 10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.017 | |
6. | Benyamin Khoshnevisan, Na Duan, Panagiotis Tsapekos, Mukesh Kumar Awasthi, Zhidan Liu, Ali Mohammadi, Irini Angelidaki, Daniel CW. Tsang, Zengqiang Zhang, Junting Pan, Lin Ma, Mortaza Aghbashlo, Meisam Tabatabaei, Hongbin Liu, A critical review on livestock manure biorefinery technologies: Sustainability, challenges, and future perspectives, 2021, 135, 13640321, 110033, 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110033 | |
7. | Reginald B. Kogbara, Wubulikasimu Yiming, Srinath R. Iyengar, Udeogu C. Onwusogh, Karim Youssef, Marwa Al-Ansary, Parilakathoottu A. Sunifar, Dhruv Arora, Ali Al-Sharshani, Osman A.E. Abdalla, Hayel M. Al-Wawi, Recycling industrial biosludge for buffel grass production in Qatar: Impact on soil, leachate and plant characteristics, 2020, 247, 00456535, 125886, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.125886 | |
8. | Nasser Al-Suhaibani, Mostafa Selim, Ali Alderfasi, Salah El-Hendawy, Comparative Performance of Integrated Nutrient Management between Composted Agricultural Wastes, Chemical Fertilizers, and Biofertilizers in Improving Soil Quantitative and Qualitative Properties and Crop Yields under Arid Conditions, 2020, 10, 2073-4395, 1503, 10.3390/agronomy10101503 | |
9. | Potential Benefits and Risks for Soil Health Derived From the Use of Organic Amendments in Agriculture, 2019, 9, 2073-4395, 542, 10.3390/agronomy9090542 | |
10. | Massimo Zaccardelli, Graziana Roscigno, Catello Pane, Giuseppe Celano, Marisa Di Matteo, Marika Mainente, Alessandra Vuotto, Teresa Mencherini, Tiziana Esposito, Antonella Vitti, Enrica De Falco, Essential oils and quality composts sourced by recycling vegetable residues from the aromatic plant supply chain, 2021, 162, 09266690, 113255, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113255 | |
11. | Houda Oueriemmi, Petra Kidd, Carmen Trasar-Cepeda, Beatriz Rodríguez-Garrido, Rahma Zoghlami, Kaouther Ardhaoui, Ángeles Prieto-Fernández, Mohamed Moussa, Evaluation of Composted Organic Wastes and Farmyard Manure for Improving Fertility of Poor Sandy Soils in Arid Regions, 2021, 11, 2077-0472, 415, 10.3390/agriculture11050415 | |
12. | Musarrat Ramzan, Naila Sarwar, Liaqat Ali, Rabia Saba, Tahani Awad Alahmadi, Rahul Datta, Nitrogen enriched chemically produced carbon supplementary impacts on maize growth under saline soil conditions, 2023, 35, 10183647, 102292, 10.1016/j.jksus.2022.102292 | |
13. | Serah W. Kimaru-Muchai, Felix K. Ngetich, Monica W. Mucheru- Muna, Mary Baaru, Zai pits for heightened sorghum production in drier parts of Upper Eastern Kenya, 2021, 7, 24058440, e08005, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08005 | |
14. | Malgorzata Kacprzak, Iwona Kupich, Anna Jasinska, Krzysztof Fijalkowski, Bio-Based Waste’ Substrates for Degraded Soil Improvement—Advantages and Challenges in European Context, 2022, 15, 1996-1073, 385, 10.3390/en15010385 | |
15. | Michela Farneselli, Euro Pannacci, Francesco Tei, Does the timing of short-term biowaste compost application affect crop growth and potential nitrate leaching? The case studies of processing tomato and cauliflower under field conditions, 2022, 17, 2039-6805, 10.4081/ija.2022.2045 | |
16. | Yahya Kooch, Neda Ghorbanzadeh, Yakov Kuzyakov, Nadine Praeg, Elham Ghaderi, Investigation of the effects of the conversion of forests and rangeland to cropland on fertility and soil functions in mountainous semi-arid landscape, 2022, 210, 03418162, 105951, 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105951 | |
17. | Jacynthe Dessureault-Rompré, Restoring Soil Functions and Agroecosystem Services Through Phytotechnologies, 2022, 2, 2673-8619, 10.3389/fsoil.2022.927148 | |
18. | Rocío Soria, José A. González-Pérez, José Mª. de la Rosa, Layla M. San Emeterio, Miguel A. Domene, Raúl Ortega, Isabel Miralles, Effects of technosols based on organic amendments addition for the recovery of the functionality of degraded quarry soils under semiarid Mediterranean climate: A field study, 2022, 816, 00489697, 151572, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151572 | |
19. | Mor-Mussery Amir, Stavi Ilan, Sarig Shlomo, Abu-Glion Hiam, Shuker Shimshon, Zaady Eli, The dynamic of the eco-hydrological interrelations between shrubs and biocrusts in the Negev shrublands: Empiric assessments and perspectives for shrubland rehabilitation, 2022, 214, 03418162, 106296, 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106296 | |
20. | Gökçen Yakupoğlu, Kadir Saltalı, Jesus Rodrigo-Comino, Tuğrul Yakupoğlu, Artemi Cerda, Manure Effect on Soil–Plant Interactions in Capia Pepper Crops under Semiarid Climate Conditions, 2022, 14, 2071-1050, 13695, 10.3390/su142013695 | |
21. | Yifan Shen, Qi Li, Xiangjun Pei, Renjie Wei, Bingmei Yang, Ningfei Lei, Xiaochao Zhang, Daqiu Yin, Shijun Wang, Qizhong Tao, Ecological Restoration of Engineering Slopes in China—A Review, 2023, 15, 2071-1050, 5354, 10.3390/su15065354 | |
22. | Murugaiyam Sinduja, Joseph Ezra John, R. Suganthi, S. Ragul, B. Balaganesh, K. Mathiyarasi, P. Kalpana, V. Sathya, 2023, Chapter 2, 978-3-031-32966-1, 29, 10.1007/978-3-031-32967-8_2 | |
23. | Nahaa M. Alotaibi, Amr M. El-Darder, Mohammed A. Alfurayji, Salah Fatouh Abou-Elwafa, Green waste-derived compost (GWC) alleviates drought stress and promotes sugar beet productivity and biofortification, 2023, 1343-943X, 1, 10.1080/1343943X.2023.2283942 | |
24. | Tesfaye Lishan, Fessha Alemu, Elucidating sole application of farmyard manure and blended NPSB fertilizer effects on soil properties at Bench Shako and West Omo zone, South West Ethiopia, 2023, 24058440, e22908, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22908 | |
25. | Salem Alhajj Ali, Gaetano Alessandro Vivaldi, Anas Tallou, Giuseppe Lopriore, Anna Maria Stellacci, Francesco Fabiano Montesano, Andrea Mazzeo, Giuseppe Ferrara, Agata Gadaleta, Salvatore Camposeo, Sustainability Potential of Marginal Areas for Food, Feed, and Non-Food Production in the Puglia Region, Southern Italy: Part II: A Review, 2024, 14, 2073-4395, 472, 10.3390/agronomy14030472 | |
26. | Rita Leogrande, Carolina Vitti, Mirko Castellini, Pasquale Garofalo, Ignazio Samarelli, Giovanni Lacolla, Francesco Fabiano Montesano, Matteo Spagnuolo, Marcello Mastrangelo, Anna Maria Stellacci, Residual Effect of Compost and Biochar Amendment on Soil Chemical, Biological, and Physical Properties and Durum Wheat Response, 2024, 14, 2073-4395, 749, 10.3390/agronomy14040749 | |
27. | Emna Ghouili, Yassine Hidri, Hatem Cheikh M’hamed, Anil C. Somenahally, Qingwu Xue, Ibrahim El Akram Znaïdi, Moez Jebara, Rim Nefissi Ouertani, Yordan Muhovski, Jouhaina Riahi, Ghassen Abid, Khaled Sassi, Assessment of Phytotoxicity and Efficiency of Date Palm Waste Compost on Barley Seeds Germination and Seedlings Growth, 2024, 0010-3624, 1, 10.1080/00103624.2024.2345147 | |
28. | Teresa Hernández, Román Francisco López Aragón, Carlos Garcia, The Use of Aerobic Urban Sewage Sludge in Agriculture: Potential Benefits and Contaminating Effects in Semi-Arid Zones, 2024, 14, 2077-0472, 983, 10.3390/agriculture14070983 | |
29. | FERTILIZAÇÃO DO SOLO PARA CULTIVO DA IPOMOEA BATATAS (L.) LAM., 2024, 10, 2447-0783, 10.21920/recei.v10i32.5903 | |
30. | Pamela Chavez-Ortiz, John Larsen, Gabriela Olmedo-Alvarez, Felipe García-Oliva, Control of inorganic and organic phosphorus molecules on microbial activity, and the stoichiometry of nutrient cycling in soils in an arid, agricultural ecosystem, 2024, 12, 2167-8359, e18140, 10.7717/peerj.18140 | |
31. | Tomás Bosco, Mónica B. Bertiller, Hebe Saraví Cisneros, Analía L. Carrera, Litter Chemistry Is a Main Driver of Inorganic Nitrogen in Disturbed Soils in the Arid Patagonian Monte, 2024, 1085-3278, 10.1002/ldr.5360 | |
32. | Janaira R. Campos, Rhaiana O. de Aviz, Davila E. Oliveira Silva, Romário M. Costa, Sandra M. B. Rocha, Francisco de Alcantara Neto, Erika V. de Medeiros, Lucas W. Mendes, Arthur P. A. de Pereira, Ademir S. F. Araujo, Short‐term effects of restoration on soil biological properties in degraded lands of the Brazilian semiarid region, 2025, 1061-2971, 10.1111/rec.70060 | |
33. | M. A. Bustamante, C. Paredes, L. Orden, M. D. Pérez-Murcia, F. J. Andreu-Rodríguez, E. Martínez-Sabater, A. Pérez-Espinosa, J. A. Sáez, R. Moral, 2025, 978-1-83767-162-5, 246, 10.1039/9781837673650-00246 |
Properties | Effect | References |
Physical properties | ||
pH | Decrease | [11,172] |
pH | Increase | [66,71] |
Soil aggregate stability | Increase | [29,126,127] |
Bulk density | Decrease | [29,126,127] |
Water holding capacity | Increase | [21,29,72,126,127] |
Porosity | Increase | [21,29,126,127] |
Erosion | Decrease | [126] |
Humic content | Increase | [21,190] |
Chemical properties | ||
TOC | Increase | [26,71,99,143,177] |
EC | Increase | [21,72,127] |
N and P | Increase | [27,31,32,71,127,177] |
Heavy metals | Increase | [174,176,190,191] |
Biochemical and microbiological properties | ||
Microbial activity | Increase | [21,26,50,59,129,148,151] |
Basal respiration | Increase | [21,151,177] |
Microbial biomass | Increase | [21,59,152] |
Pathogenic level | Increase | [127,190] |
Reference | Organic material | Application rate | Soil type | Period of time | Reported benefits |
[151] | Municipal solid waste | 6.5 and 26 kg m–2 | Abandoned agricultural soil (Spain) | Long term (20 years) | Reactivation of soil biochemical functions and increase in soil fertility |
[59] | Municipal solid waste compost (MSW) and cow manure (MA) | MSW at 20 and 80 t ha–1 and MA at 20 t ha–1 | Agricultural soil (Spain) | Long term (9 years) | MSW compost can improve soil quality, increasing the organic matter content and improve soil biological and biochemical properties |
[125] | Fresh and composed urban waste | 25–30 kg m–2 | Abandoned agricultural soil (Spain) | Short term (1 year) | Increases in organic matter and microbial biomass, the maintenance of the soil's biochemical cycles and the establishment of a plant cover |
[174] | Composted municipal solid waste (MSW) | 40, 80 and 120 Mg ha–1 of MSW | Calcareous soil (Spain) | Short term (5 years) | MSW application has a positive effect on the soil chemical properties and promotes the growth of native vegetation without causing environmental damage |
[60] | Beet vinasse, green manure and a composted mixture of both residues | Equivalence of 10 t organic matter ha–1 | Restoration of a Xelloric Calciorthid soil (Spain) | Short term (4 years) | Beet vinasse had a detrimental effect on soil properties while green manure and the composted mixture had positive effects on soil physical and biological properties |
[11] | Municipal solid waste | 65,130,195 and 260 t ha–1 | Semiarid abandoned soil (Spain) | Long term (17 years) | Improvement in the soil biochemical properties and changes in the soil microbial community |
[152] | Organic urban refuse | 6.5, 13.0, 19.5 and 26.0 kg m–2 | Mediterranean semiarid soil (Spain) | Long term (19 years) | Improvement in the soil biochemical and microbiological properties in relation to the applied dose |
[64] | Hydrolysates organic biofertilisers or biostimulants | 4.7 t organic matter ha–1 | Eroded soil (Spain) | Short term (3 years) | Positive effect on soil biological properties, and favourable to vegetal establishment |
[177] | Composted sewage sludge | 30, 60 and 90 Mg ha–1 | Abandoned agricultural soil (Spain) | Short term (3 years) | Increases in chemical and biological soil properties at higher doses |
[179] | Composted dry organic green waste | 7 Kg m–2 (1.42 kg C m–2, and 129 g N m–2) | Grassland soils (California, US) | Short term (3 years) | A single application of compost increases soil C and N storage in labile and physically protected pools over relatively short time periods, contributing to climate change mitigation |
[28] | Composted and anaerobic digested sewage sludge | 12 kg m–2 | Arid-degraded soil (Spain) | Long term (10 years) | The long-term impact of organic restoration affects soil microbial community function and structure, and it depends on the material added to the soil |
[50] | Vegetative compost (VC) and biosolids (BS) | 137 mg ha–1 (VC); 202 and 403 mg ha–1(BS) | Degraded soil (Illinois, US) | Short term (3 years) | Stimulates fungal populations and soil enzyme activities |
[26] | Pelletized plant, animal and sewage sludge compost (PEL); Municipal solid waste compost (MSW); Sheep manure compost (SMC) | 3700 of PEL, 4075 of MSW, and 4630 kg ha–1 of SMC (fresh weights) | Vineyard soil (Spain) | Long term (13 years) | Continuous long-term application of organic amendments positively affects soil quality, increasing microbial activity, C storage and denitrification potential |
[223] | Urban municipal solid waste compost (MSW) and alfalfa residue (AR) | 10 and 30 Mg ha–1 (MSW and AR) | Semiarid soil (Kerman, Iran) | Short term (2 years) | Higher respiration and decomposability in the MSW-treated soils resulted in greater formation of water stable aggregates and an increase in the macro-pore fraction, but reduced levels of SOC more than in AR soils. |
[213] | NPK + straw (NPK + s), and NPK + manure (NPK + m) | 37% NPK + s and 32% NPK + m (more N input than for NPK alone). | Paddy soils (China) | Long term experiments | Manure can increase the rice yield and soil C sequestration. Applying both chemical and organic fertilisers (NPK + m) leads to a longer duration of soil C sequestration than a chemical fertiliser alone. |
Provisioning services |
Provision of food, wood and fibre |
Provision of raw materials |
Provision of support for human infrastructures and animals |
Regulating services |
Flood mitigation |
Filtering of nutrients and contaminants |
C storage and greenhouse gas regulation |
Detoxification and the recycling of wastes |
Regulation of pests and disease populations |
Cultural services |
Recreation |
Aesthetics |
Heritage values |
Cultural identity |
Properties | Effect | References |
Physical properties | ||
pH | Decrease | [11,172] |
pH | Increase | [66,71] |
Soil aggregate stability | Increase | [29,126,127] |
Bulk density | Decrease | [29,126,127] |
Water holding capacity | Increase | [21,29,72,126,127] |
Porosity | Increase | [21,29,126,127] |
Erosion | Decrease | [126] |
Humic content | Increase | [21,190] |
Chemical properties | ||
TOC | Increase | [26,71,99,143,177] |
EC | Increase | [21,72,127] |
N and P | Increase | [27,31,32,71,127,177] |
Heavy metals | Increase | [174,176,190,191] |
Biochemical and microbiological properties | ||
Microbial activity | Increase | [21,26,50,59,129,148,151] |
Basal respiration | Increase | [21,151,177] |
Microbial biomass | Increase | [21,59,152] |
Pathogenic level | Increase | [127,190] |
Reference | Organic material | Application rate | Soil type | Period of time | Reported benefits |
[151] | Municipal solid waste | 6.5 and 26 kg m–2 | Abandoned agricultural soil (Spain) | Long term (20 years) | Reactivation of soil biochemical functions and increase in soil fertility |
[59] | Municipal solid waste compost (MSW) and cow manure (MA) | MSW at 20 and 80 t ha–1 and MA at 20 t ha–1 | Agricultural soil (Spain) | Long term (9 years) | MSW compost can improve soil quality, increasing the organic matter content and improve soil biological and biochemical properties |
[125] | Fresh and composed urban waste | 25–30 kg m–2 | Abandoned agricultural soil (Spain) | Short term (1 year) | Increases in organic matter and microbial biomass, the maintenance of the soil's biochemical cycles and the establishment of a plant cover |
[174] | Composted municipal solid waste (MSW) | 40, 80 and 120 Mg ha–1 of MSW | Calcareous soil (Spain) | Short term (5 years) | MSW application has a positive effect on the soil chemical properties and promotes the growth of native vegetation without causing environmental damage |
[60] | Beet vinasse, green manure and a composted mixture of both residues | Equivalence of 10 t organic matter ha–1 | Restoration of a Xelloric Calciorthid soil (Spain) | Short term (4 years) | Beet vinasse had a detrimental effect on soil properties while green manure and the composted mixture had positive effects on soil physical and biological properties |
[11] | Municipal solid waste | 65,130,195 and 260 t ha–1 | Semiarid abandoned soil (Spain) | Long term (17 years) | Improvement in the soil biochemical properties and changes in the soil microbial community |
[152] | Organic urban refuse | 6.5, 13.0, 19.5 and 26.0 kg m–2 | Mediterranean semiarid soil (Spain) | Long term (19 years) | Improvement in the soil biochemical and microbiological properties in relation to the applied dose |
[64] | Hydrolysates organic biofertilisers or biostimulants | 4.7 t organic matter ha–1 | Eroded soil (Spain) | Short term (3 years) | Positive effect on soil biological properties, and favourable to vegetal establishment |
[177] | Composted sewage sludge | 30, 60 and 90 Mg ha–1 | Abandoned agricultural soil (Spain) | Short term (3 years) | Increases in chemical and biological soil properties at higher doses |
[179] | Composted dry organic green waste | 7 Kg m–2 (1.42 kg C m–2, and 129 g N m–2) | Grassland soils (California, US) | Short term (3 years) | A single application of compost increases soil C and N storage in labile and physically protected pools over relatively short time periods, contributing to climate change mitigation |
[28] | Composted and anaerobic digested sewage sludge | 12 kg m–2 | Arid-degraded soil (Spain) | Long term (10 years) | The long-term impact of organic restoration affects soil microbial community function and structure, and it depends on the material added to the soil |
[50] | Vegetative compost (VC) and biosolids (BS) | 137 mg ha–1 (VC); 202 and 403 mg ha–1(BS) | Degraded soil (Illinois, US) | Short term (3 years) | Stimulates fungal populations and soil enzyme activities |
[26] | Pelletized plant, animal and sewage sludge compost (PEL); Municipal solid waste compost (MSW); Sheep manure compost (SMC) | 3700 of PEL, 4075 of MSW, and 4630 kg ha–1 of SMC (fresh weights) | Vineyard soil (Spain) | Long term (13 years) | Continuous long-term application of organic amendments positively affects soil quality, increasing microbial activity, C storage and denitrification potential |
[223] | Urban municipal solid waste compost (MSW) and alfalfa residue (AR) | 10 and 30 Mg ha–1 (MSW and AR) | Semiarid soil (Kerman, Iran) | Short term (2 years) | Higher respiration and decomposability in the MSW-treated soils resulted in greater formation of water stable aggregates and an increase in the macro-pore fraction, but reduced levels of SOC more than in AR soils. |
[213] | NPK + straw (NPK + s), and NPK + manure (NPK + m) | 37% NPK + s and 32% NPK + m (more N input than for NPK alone). | Paddy soils (China) | Long term experiments | Manure can increase the rice yield and soil C sequestration. Applying both chemical and organic fertilisers (NPK + m) leads to a longer duration of soil C sequestration than a chemical fertiliser alone. |
Provisioning services |
Provision of food, wood and fibre |
Provision of raw materials |
Provision of support for human infrastructures and animals |
Regulating services |
Flood mitigation |
Filtering of nutrients and contaminants |
C storage and greenhouse gas regulation |
Detoxification and the recycling of wastes |
Regulation of pests and disease populations |
Cultural services |
Recreation |
Aesthetics |
Heritage values |
Cultural identity |