Processing math: 100%
Research article Special Issues

An equivalent photovoltaic solar system to solve the problems of electricity in Iraqi houses

  • Since 1991, Iraqi society suffers from the lack of electricity power because of an economic embargo imposed from 1991 to 2003 and the mismanagement that hit Iraq after its occupation in 2003. These reasons were leaded to major problems in the power plants and their transmission lines which led to insufficient power generation. To meet this problem, the Iraqi families were tended to use two types of generators (neighborhood and household generators) as alternative sources for compensating the lack of electricity. In this study, a 3 kW photovoltaic (PV) solar system was proposed to use the solar energy in Iraqi houses. An economic feasibility analysis by calculating the life cycle cost was investigated to compare the cost of PV system with the two alternatives sources of generators. At current market price of PV panels (700 IQD/W), a 3 kW PV system has the ability to supply the Iraqi house with electrical energy in total cost about (4,386,366 IQD ≈ 3655 USA$) for five years. The life cycle cost of PV system was investigated about 12.27% less than the two generators cost. Therefore, PV system is more economic in Iraqi houses under the deterioration in the electricity sector. Furthermore, the PV solar not pollutes the environment as the case of using generators.

    Citation: Abdulrahman Th. Mohammad, Amer Ibrahim Ismael. An equivalent photovoltaic solar system to solve the problems of electricity in Iraqi houses[J]. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(5): 660-670. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.5.660

    Related Papers:

    [1] Nadwan Majeed Ali, Handri Ammari . Design of a hybrid wind-solar street lighting system to power LED lights on highway poles. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(2): 177-190. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022010
    [2] Mulualem T. Yeshalem, Baseem Khan . Design of an off-grid hybrid PV/wind power system for remote mobile base station: A case study. AIMS Energy, 2017, 5(1): 96-112. doi: 10.3934/energy.2017.1.96
    [3] Nadejda Komendantova, Markus Manuel Schwarz, Wolfgang Amann . Economic and regulatory feasibility of solar PV in the Austrian multi-apartment housing sector. AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(5): 810-831. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.5.810
    [4] Fadhil Khadoum Alhousni, Firas Basim Ismail, Paul C. Okonkwo, Hassan Mohamed, Bright O. Okonkwo, Omar A. Al-Shahri . A review of PV solar energy system operations and applications in Dhofar Oman. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(4): 858-884. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022039
    [5] Jin H. Jo, Kadi Ilves, Tyler Barth, Ellen Leszczynski . Implementation of a large-scale solar photovoltaic system at a higher education institution in Illinois, USA. AIMS Energy, 2017, 5(1): 54-62. doi: 10.3934/energy.2017.1.54
    [6] Sabir Rustemli, Zeki İlcihan, Gökhan Sahin, Wilfried G. J. H. M. van Sark . A novel design and simulation of a mechanical coordinate based photovoltaic solar tracking system. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(5): 753-773. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023037
    [7] Michael O. Dioha, Atul Kumar . Rooftop solar PV for urban residential buildings of Nigeria: A preliminary attempt towards potential estimation. AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(5): 710-734. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.5.710
    [8] Jin H. Jo, Jamie Cross, Zachary Rose, Evan Daebel, Andrew Verderber, David G. Loomis . Financing options and economic impact: distributed generation using solar photovoltaic systems in Normal, Illinois. AIMS Energy, 2016, 4(3): 504-516. doi: 10.3934/energy.2016.3.504
    [9] Rashmi Murali, Sangeeta Malhotra, Debajit Palit, Krishnapada Sasmal . Socio-technical assessment of solar photovoltaic systems implemented for rural electrification in selected villages of Sundarbans region of India. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(4): 612-634. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.4.612
    [10] Md. Mehadi Hasan Shamim, Sidratul Montaha Silmee, Md. Mamun Sikder . Optimization and cost-benefit analysis of a grid-connected solar photovoltaic system. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(3): 434-457. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022022
  • Since 1991, Iraqi society suffers from the lack of electricity power because of an economic embargo imposed from 1991 to 2003 and the mismanagement that hit Iraq after its occupation in 2003. These reasons were leaded to major problems in the power plants and their transmission lines which led to insufficient power generation. To meet this problem, the Iraqi families were tended to use two types of generators (neighborhood and household generators) as alternative sources for compensating the lack of electricity. In this study, a 3 kW photovoltaic (PV) solar system was proposed to use the solar energy in Iraqi houses. An economic feasibility analysis by calculating the life cycle cost was investigated to compare the cost of PV system with the two alternatives sources of generators. At current market price of PV panels (700 IQD/W), a 3 kW PV system has the ability to supply the Iraqi house with electrical energy in total cost about (4,386,366 IQD ≈ 3655 USA$) for five years. The life cycle cost of PV system was investigated about 12.27% less than the two generators cost. Therefore, PV system is more economic in Iraqi houses under the deterioration in the electricity sector. Furthermore, the PV solar not pollutes the environment as the case of using generators.


    Symbols: Am: Module area; C: Cost (IQD); CAh: Battery ampere capacity (A/h); Cwh: Battery watt capacity (W/h); d: Interest rate (%); E/m2: Energy received by PV (kW/m2); EL: Energy consumed by the load (kW); IC: Controller current (A); i: inflation rate (%); Nc: Number of controller; Npv: Number of solar cell; Vb: Battery voltage (V)

    Abbreviations: MPW: Maintenance present worth; DOD: Permissible depth of discharge rate of a cell; IOP: Inverter output power; IQD: Iraqi Dinar; LCC: life cycle cost; ML: Maximum load; NC: Number of continuous cloudy days; PR: Performance ratio; SF: Safety factor

    Greek letters: η module: PV module efficiency; ηb: Battery efficiency

    Subscripts: n-g: Neighborhood generator; h-g: Household generator; ins: Installation; O&M: Operation and maintenance; b: Battery; c: Controller; inv: Inverter

    The Electrical energy that produced from Photovoltaic solar system has become an excellant option to offset the growing demand of electricity around the world [1], reliable and has the potential to reduce the CO2 emissions [2]. Many countries have effectively turned on this type of energy due to the availability of the solar radiation over a wide range of the year. This led many researchers to focus their attention on developing and increasing the efficiency of photovoltaic solar systems to achieve an economic feasibility. In the last years, some of studies in literatures have examined the performance evaluation of photovoltaic solar systems. The evaluation was based on some main indicators that reported in these studies including: the total energy production, performance ratio (PR), and the system efficiency. Renu S. and Sonali G. [3] examined the annual performance of 11.2 kWp in India. The experimental examination showed that the total energy, efficiency and PR were 14.96 MWh, 13.42% and 0.78 respectively. In Italy, the performance analysis of two systems 395.61 kWp and 1042.29 kWp showed that the PR of the two systems was 0.872 and 0.832 respectively [4]. In Morocco, Charaf H. et al. [5] examined experimentally different modules and sizes of PV systems and showed that the Twidell was the best module with PR = 0.8 and an average efficiency of 16%. The performance assessment of 4.5 kWp in Nigeria showed that the energy production of the system was 14.52% from the size of the system [6]. In addition, the performance analysis of 1.72 kWp system in Ireland was presented experimentally by Ayompe L.M. et al. [7]. The analysis showed that the annual total energy of the system was 885.1 kW h/kWp and system efficiency was 14.9%. On the other side, some of studies were focused on an economic feasibility of the PV solar systems depending on two main important indicators include life cycle and pay-back period. In Ireland, the experimental feasibility of 53.625 kWp PV system showed that the life cycle was 5.23 years [8]. In Japan, Yanxue L. et al. [9] simulated Techno economic performances of 5.0 kWp and showed that the net present value of system was over 20 years. As reported in Rodrigues S. et al. [10] study, the investment of 5 kWp system during 25 years in Germany and Italy was 13% higher than the most European countries. The payback period of 67.27 kWp system was recorded 11 years in United Kingdom [11]. In Palestine, the economic evaluation of 24.614 kWp system showed that dynamic pay-back period of system was 10.4 years [12]. The main goal of this work is to study the necessary of using the PV system to provide the required electricity for Iraqi houses. An economic feasibility investigation of 3 kWp PV solar system by calculating the life cycle cost was analyzed and compared with the two alternative sources represented in neighborhood and household generators.

    The electricity sector in Iraq suffered from deterioration since 1991 till now due to:

    1. Old power generation plants, distribution and transmision networks;

    2. Economic embargo in 1991;

    3. American invasion in 2003;

    4. Vandalism and neglecting from Iraqi goverment.

    These factors led to severe power shortages to households, with power being available for less than 12 hours per day. To meet these power shortages, Iraqi families were forced to use other alternative sources such as the diesel neighborhood generators together with small gasoline portable generators (household), both of which have added a considerable financial burden on people. The financial burden includes the prices of generators, fuel and maintenance costs. In view of this phenomenon, the main goal of this work was to suggest and analyze the feasibility economic of a 3 kW PV solar system and compare it with the financial burden of the two generators (neighborhood and household). The study was conducted for a period of five years from (2014 to 2019) according to the current Iraqi market price. Questionnaire form was prepared to facilitate the calculation cost of neighborhood and household generators as shown in Table 1. The information of a questionnaire form was taken in the region where the neighborhood generator installed. Numbers of parameters were included in the questionnaire form, some of these parameters were related to the neighborhood generator (number and price of ambers) and other parameters were related to household generator (purchase cost, operation hours and maintenance cost).

    Table 1.  Questionnaire form of generators information.
    Neighborhood generator Household generator
    Family No. No. of persons No. of required amperes Price (IQD/amperes*month) Purchase cost (IQD) No. of operating hours Cost of fuel (IQD/day) Period of oil change (hours) Oil cost (IQD/year) Maintenance cost (IQD/year)
    1 3 4 8000 180000 4 1350 30–35 48000 80000
    2 4 4 8000 210000 4 1350 25–30 58000 90000
    3 5 4 8000 200000 4 1350 30–40 41000 90000
    4 6 4 8000 225000 3 1013 30–40 31000 85000
    5 4 4 8000 230000 4 1350 30–40 41000 90000
    6 5 4 8000 230000 4 1350 25–30 58000 95000
    7 5 4 8000 220000 4 1350 30–40 41000 85000
    8 7 4 8000 240000 3 1013 30–35 36000 80000
    9 5 4 8000 220000 4 1350 30–35 48000 85000
    10 4 4 8000 240000 4 1350 30–35 48000 100000

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Neighborhood generator is a private diesel generator widely used in Iraq after 2003 to provide the electricity during the duration of national power outage. It is invested by a person and placed in a small neighborhood. The Iraqi government supplies the fuel to the generators at a reasonable price. So, the price of ampere from the neighborhood generator are controlled at 8000 IQD/ampere. According to the questionnaire form, the average of amperes demand of Iraqi family is equal to 4 amperes (equivalent to 1 kWh at 250 V supply). Therefore, the cost to be paid to the neighborhood generators for four amperes in one month is 32,000 IQD with total cost (Cn-g) in five years is 1,920,000 IQD (Cn-g = 4 amperes × 8,000 (IQD/amperes×month) × 60 month = 1,920,000 IQD).

    Iraqi markets contain different types of portable gasoline generators with different rated power (KVA) and different specifications. Gasoline generator model (Tiger-single phase-3KVA) with fuel capacity 10 liters and 0.5 liters oil were included in this study as shown in Figure 1. Schedule run of portable generator is from 5:00 am until 12:00 pm with an actual operation period 4 hours/day and the operation period depends on the national power outage and neighborhood generator off. The cost of household generator is listed in Table 2 including purchase, operation and maintenance cost. The cost calculation of household generator was investigated based on the data of Table 1.

    Figure 1.  Household generator.
    Table 2.  Cost of household generator.
    Cost type The explanation Cost (IQD) per 5 years
    Purchase Average price in Iraqi market 210,000
    Fuel Consume 0.75 liter /hr (4 hours operation)
    Price of gasoline = 450 IQD/liter
    2,430,000
    Oil Oil capacity (0.5 liter)
    Period of oil change (30 hours operation)
    Price of oil = 1500 IQD/liter
    180,000
    Maintenance Average cost in 1 year = 88,000 IQD 440,000
    Total cost (Ch-g) 3,080,000

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The average maximum load was calculated in the summer and according to the actual need for household appliances as shown in Table 3. The actual operation period of appliances depends on the schedule of power shortages. Based on the table, the maximum energy demand is 1.11 kW then the maximum hourly load consumption should be 17.73 kWh. Figure 2 represents the actual load profile according to the number of operation hours.

    Table 3.  Measured appliances loads in Iraqi house.
    Appliance Watt Number Hours Used/Day Watt Hours/Day
    Refrigerator 350 1 12 4200
    Ceiling Fan 80 4 12 3840
    Light 60 8 8 3840
    Television 250 1 10 2500
    Cooling/heating water 300 1 10 3000
    Laptop 70 1 5 350
    Total power (EL) 1110 17730

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 2.  Actual load profile.

    A 3 kWp system with twelve solar module (Dusol DS60260W Dubi) made from polycrystalline silicon was proposed in this study according to the calculation of the load and sizing of components. The general specifications of the solar system components are summarized in Table 4 and its photograph shown in Figure 3.

    Table 4.  General specifications of the solar system components.
    Component Quantity Model type and manufacture Specification Value
    Solar module 12 Dusol DS60260W Dubi Maximum power (Pmax) 250 W
    Open cicut voltage (Voc) 38 V
    Short circuit current (Isc) 8.79 A
    Peak voltage (Vmpp) 31.4
    Peak current(Impp) 8.28 A
    Area 1.67 m2
    Efficiency 14%
    Solar controller 2 MPPT/China Battery voltage 12/24/48 V
    Charger current 60 A
    Maximum power 840/1680/3360 W
    Maximum voltage 150 V DC
    Inverter and charger 1 SAKO/SKN-S 1.5 kW Input voltage 24 V DC
    Output voltage 220 V AC, 50 Hz
    Battery 2 Fortuner FR12-300D Nominal voltage 12 V
    Power 300 Ah

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 3.  Proposed PV solar system.

    The sizing of the PV solar system components includes: number of solar panel, inverter output power, storage capacity of the battery and MPPT controller.

    The total peak power and the module number of the proposed PV system can be calculated as [13]:

    PPV=ELPSH×ηR×ηin×SF=17.738.7×0.9×0.92×1.2=2,855 Wp (1)
    NPV=PPVPmodule=285525012 cells (2)

    where: EL: Daily Energy consumption (17.73) kWh, PSH: peak sun hours (8.7) hours [14], ηR and ηin: charge regulator and inverter efficiencies (0.9 and 0.92) [13], SF: Safety factor (1.2) [15] and Pmodule: module power is selected (250) W.

    The inverter output power (IOP) calculated according to [16]: IOP = (25−30)% greater than maximum load (ML) = 0.25 × 1.11 + 1.11 = 1.38 ≈ 1.5 kW. Therefore, the inverter specifications is selected as 1500 W, 24 V DC, 220 V AC, and 50 Hz.

    As reported in [12], the watt hour capacity of pattery can be calculated as:

    Watt hour capacity(Cwh)=NC×ELDOD×ηb=0.5×177300.75×0.8513,906  Wh (4)

    NC: Number of continuous cloudy days of the interested area = 0.5, DOD: Permissible depth of discharge rate of a cell = 0.75 [12], ηb: Battery efficiency = 0.85 [12].

    The selected DC bus voltage is 24, therefore:

    Ampere hour capacity (CAh) = Cwh/24  579.5 Ah (5)

    Number of batteries = 2 batteries of 12 V and 300 Ah connected in series to give 12 hours operation.

    Total maximum power of PV (Pmax-tot) = Pmax × NPV  = 250  ×  12 = 3000 watts (6)

    The maximum power of controller (Pmax-C) and number of controller (NC) can be calculated as [15]:

    Pmax-C  = Battery voltage (Vb ×  Controller current (IC) = 24  ×  60 = 1440 watts (7)
    NC =Pmax-tot/Pmax-C= 3000/1440  2 controllers (8)

    The LCC of the PV solar system can be classified into three parts: (ⅰ) components cost (ⅱ) installation cost (ⅲ) operation and maintenance cost. The details of calculating the components cost of the proposed PV solar system are represented in Table 5.

    Table 5.  Cost calculations of proposed PV solar system.
    Components Quantity Cost (IQD) Total cost (IQD)
    Solar cell 12 cells/250 W 700/W CPV = 2,100,000
    Solar controller 2 80000 Cc = 160,000
    Inverter 1 650000 Cinv = 650,000
    Battery 2 batteries/300 A 1600 / A Cb = 960,000
    Wiring, base and installation Total 100000 Cins = 100,000
    Operation and Maintenance
    (O&M/yr)
    Total 2% PV cost CO&M = 79,400

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The present worth of the maintenance cost for the proposed PV solar system in 5 years can be calculated as [16,17]:

    CMPW=Myr(1+i1+d)[1(1+i1+d)N1(1+i1+d)]= 336,966 IQD (9)

    where: i is the inflation rate and assumed to be 3% and d is the interest rate assumed to be 9%. Therefore, the total life cycle of the PV system can be calculated as [18]:

    LCC=CPV+CC+Cinv+Cb+Cins+CMPW= 4,386,366 IQD (10)

    The Iraqi government has not given much attention to use of PV solar energy for solving the problems in the electric power sector. In this paper, the cost and an economic feasibility investigation of proposed PV solar system was analyzed by calculating the life cycle cost. A comparison between the proposed system and two alternative sources (generators) that used together in Iraqi house was investigated. According to the results analysis, the total cost of the financial burden in five years for neighborhood generator was found to be (1,920,000 IQD ≈ 1600 USA$) while the cost of household generator was found to be (3,080,000 IQD ≈ 2566.6 USA$). Totally, the cost of the two generators was recorded about (5,000,000 IQD ≈ 4166.6 USA$) in five years. As shown in Figure 4, the cost of household generator represents 61.6% from the total cost of the two generators. The cost of neighborhood generator increases with an increasing in number of amperes that the Iraqi family needed. While, the cost of household generator depend on two parameters (operations hours and maintenance cost). The operation hours of household generator increase in the event of breakdowns of the neighborhood generator causing an increase in the cost of fuel and oil consumption and maintenance. On the other side, the life cycle cost LCC of the proposed PV solar system is found to be (4,386,366 IQD ≈ 3655 USA$). As shown in Figure 5, the cost of PV system is less than the cost of two generators by (613,634 IQD ≈ 511.3 USA$). In the other words, the LCC of two generators is greatly higher than PV solar cost with 12.27%.

    Figure 4.  Total cost of generators.
    Figure 5.  Costs of three sources.

    According to the economic feasibility analysis of the PV solar system comparing with the two types of generators, the following conclusions can be made:

    1. The cost of household generator is greater than the neighborhood generator about 42.6%;

    2. The breakdowns in the neighborhood generator increase the operation hours of the household generator then increase the fuel, oil and maintenance costs;

    3. According to LCC, the cost of two generators is greatly higher than PV solar cost with 12.27%;

    4. The PV solar system is more economic in Iraqi houses under the deterioration in the electricity sector. Furthermore, the PV solar not pollutes the environment as the case of using household and neighborhood generators.

    The authors would like to thank the staff of Baqubah Technical Institute and Technical Engineering collage for their help.

    All authors appear no conflicts of interest.



    [1] Nawaz I, Tiwari GN (2006) Embodied energy analysis of photovoltaic (PV) system based on macro- and micro-level. Energy Policy 34: 3144-3152. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.06.018
    [2] Pearce JM (2002) Photovoltaics-a path to sustainable futures. Futures 34: 663-674. doi: 10.1016/S0016-3287(02)00008-3
    [3] Sharma R, Goel S (2017) Performance analysis of a 11.2 kWp roof top grid-connected PV system in Eastern India. Energy Rep 3: 76-84.
    [4] Ghiani E, Pilo F, Cossu S (2013) Evaluation of photovoltaic installations performances in Sardinia. Energy Convers Manage 76: 1134-1142. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.09.012
    [5] Hajjaj C, Merrouni AA, Bouaichi A, et al. (2018) Evaluation, comparison and experimental validation of different PV power prediction models under semi-arid climate. Energy Convers Manage 173: 476-488. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.07.094
    [6] Ismail OS, Ajide OO, Akingbesote F (2012) Performance assessment of installed solar PV system: A case study of Oke-Agunla in Nigeria. Engineering 4: 453-458. doi: 10.4236/eng.2012.48059
    [7] Ayompe LM, Duffy A, McCormack SJ, et al. (2011) Measured performance of a 1.72 kW rooftop grid connected photovoltaic system in Ireland. Energy Convers Manage 52: 816-825.
    [8] Murphy F, McDonnell K (2017) A feasibility assessment of photovoltaic power systems in Ireland; a case study for the Dublin Region. Sustainability 9: 1-14.
    [9] Li Y, Gao W, Ruan Y (2018) Performance investigation of grid-connected residential PV-battery system focusing on enhancing self-consumption and peak shaving in Kyushu, Japan. Renewable Energy 127: 514-523, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.04.074
    [10] Rodrigues S, Torabikalaki R, Faria F, et al. (2016) Economic feasibility analysis of small scale PV systems in different countries. Sol Energy 131: 81-95. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2016.02.019
    [11] Lee J, Chang B, Aktas C, et al. (2016) Economic feasibility of campus-wide photovoltaic systems in New England. Renewable Energy 99: 452-464. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.07.009
    [12] Mahmoud MM, Ibrik IH (2006) Techno-economic feasibility of energy supply of remote villages in Palestine by PV-systems, diesel generators and electric grid. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 10: 128-138. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2004.09.001
    [13] Akel A, Mahmoud M, Shabaneh R (1996) Renewable energy assessment for Palestine (solar and wind). Palestinian Energy Environ Res Cent.
    [14] Al-Salihi AM, Kadum MM, Mohammed AJ (2010) Estimation of global solar radiation on horizontal surface using routine meteorological measurements for different cities in Iraq. Asian J Sci Res 3: 240-248. doi: 10.3923/ajsr.2010.240.248
    [15] Kebede KY (2015) Viability study of grid-connected solar PV system in Ethiopia. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess 10: 63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2015.02.003
    [16] How to design solar pv system-guide for sizing your solar photovoltaic system. Available from: http://www.leonics.com/support/article2_12j/articles2_12j_en.php.
    [17] Messenger R, Ventre J (2000) Photovoltaic Systems Engineering. CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
    [18] Ajan CW, Ahmed SS, Ahmad HB, et al. (2003) On the policy of photovoltaic and diesel generation mix for an off-grid site: East Malaysian perspectives. Sol Energy 74: 453-467. doi: 10.1016/S0038-092X(03)00228-7
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Rômulo de Oliveira Azevêdo, Paulo Rotela Junior, Luiz Célio Souza Rocha, Gianfranco Chicco, Giancarlo Aquila, Rogério Santana Peruchi, Identification and Analysis of Impact Factors on the Economic Feasibility of Photovoltaic Energy Investments, 2020, 12, 2071-1050, 7173, 10.3390/su12177173
    2. Noor Mahmood, Ahmed Ajmi, Shamsul Sarip, Hazilah Kaidi, Khairur Jamaludin, Hayati Talib, Modeling the Sustainable Integration of Quality and Energy Management in Power Plants, 2022, 14, 2071-1050, 2460, 10.3390/su14042460
    3. Omar Mohammed Ali, Omar Rafae Alomar, Shaaban Ibrahim Mohamed, Technical, economical and environmental feasibility study of a photovoltaic system under the climatic condition of north Iraq, 2022, 0143-0750, 1, 10.1080/01430750.2022.2126004
    4. Jehan Rasheed Majeed, Ali Nasser Hussain, Abdulrahman Th. Mohammad, 2023, Design Off-Grid Solar Water Pumping System as a Replacement to Petrol Pump in Remote Area, 979-8-3503-4440-0, 108, 10.1109/ICESAT58213.2023.10347290
    5. Omar Rafae Alomar, Noor Moneer Basher, Omar Mohammed Ali, Abdulrahman Salih, Nabeel M. Abdulrazzaq, Sarkaft M. Samad, Energetic, Economic Environmental Analysis for Photovoltaic Grid-Connected Systems under Different Climate Conditions in Iraq, 2025, 27727831, 100180, 10.1016/j.cles.2025.100180
    6. Nurul Hasanah Johari, Wesam Salah Alaloul, Muhammad Ali Musarat, Recent advancements of life cycle cost analysis of photovoltaic systems: a systematic review, 2025, 0948-3349, 10.1007/s11367-025-02474-3
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4748) PDF downloads(480) Cited by(6)

Figures and Tables

Figures(5)  /  Tables(5)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog