Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

A review on the current state of the art for the production of advanced liquid biofuels

1 University of Birmingham, School of Chemical Engineering, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom
2 UNESP, Department of Rural Engineering, FCA, Botucatu, Av. Universitária, nº 3780 18610-034, São Paulo, Brazil
3 Fraunhofer UMSICHT, Fraunhofer Institute for Environmental, Safety, and Energy Technology, An der Maxhütte 1, 92237 Sulzbach-Rosenberg, Germany
4 Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Schlossplatz 4, 91054 Erlangen, Germany

Topical Section: Bioenergy and Biofuel

Recent socio-political and economic factors encourage development of bioenergy and biofuels. The aim of this paper is to provide an updated review of the most promising technologies for sustainable production of advanced liquid biofuels, specifically transportation fuels. The focus is on second generation biofuels since they do not compete with land required for arable and pastoral use; therefore, first generation biofuels are not included in this review. Upon evaluation the authors recognise the most promising liquid biofuels to include bioethanol, biobutanol, biodiesel, green diesel, biomethanol, dimethyl ether, bio-oil, and biojet fuel. The order of the paper follows a specific structure. Initially, a detailed description, including physical and chemical properties, is given for each liquid biofuel. Then a review of production pathways for each fuel is given, including details regarding the feasibility of integrating it into the current liquid fuel infrastructure. Furthermore, a discussion of the challenges associated with current production pathways is provided.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

Keywords biofuels; bioenegy; biomass; second generation; biodiesel; bio-oil

Citation: Antzela Fivga, Lais Galileu Speranza, Carolina Musse Branco, Miloud Ouadi, Andreas Hornung. A review on the current state of the art for the production of advanced liquid biofuels. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(1): 46-76. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.1.46

References

  • 1. IRENA (2018) Global energy transformation: A roadmap to 2050. Int Renew Energ Agency, Abu Dhabi.
  • 2. IEA (2010) Sustainable production of second-generation biofuels: Potential and perspectives in major economies and developing countries. Int Energy Agency, IEA/OECD, Paris.
  • 3. Ho DP, Ngo HH, Guo W (2014) A mini review on renewable sources for biofuel. Bioresour Technol 169: 742–749.    
  • 4. Mahmudul HM, Hagos FY, Mamat R, et al. (2017) Production, characterization and performance of biodiesel as an alternative fuel in diesel engines-a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 72: 497–509.    
  • 5. Al-Mashhadani H, Fernando S (2017) Properties, performance, and applications of biofuel blends: a review. AIMS Energy 5: 735–767.    
  • 6. Küüt A, Ritslaid K, Küüt K, et al. (2019) Chapter 3-State of the Art on the Conventional Processes for Ethanol Production. Ethanol, 61–101.
  • 7. Zabed H, Sahu JN, Suely A, et al. (2017) Bioethanol production from renewable sources: Current perspectives and technological progress. Renew Sust Energ Rev 71: 475–501.    
  • 8. Zabed H, Sahu JN, Boyce AN, et al. (2016) Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: An overview on feedstocks and technological approaches. Renew Sust Energ Rev 66: 751–774.    
  • 9. Zhu JY, Pan XJ (2010) Woody biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production: Technology and energy consumption evaluation. Bioresour Technol 101: 4992–5002.    
  • 10. da Silva FL, de Oliveira Campos A, dos Santos DA (2018) Valorization of an agroextractive residue-Carnauba straw-for the production of bioethanol by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF). Renew Energy 127: 661–669.    
  • 11. Nguyen QA, Yang J, Bae HJ (2017) Bioethanol production from individual and mixed agricultural biomass residues. Ind Crop Prod 95: 718–725.    
  • 12. Rana V, Eckard AD, Ahring BK (2014) Comparison of SHF and SSF of wet exploded corn stover and loblolly pine using in-house enzymes produced from T. reesei RUT C30 and A. saccharolyticus. SpringerPlus 3: 516.
  • 13. Dahnum D, Tasum SO, Triwahyuni E (2015) Comparison of SHF and SSF Processes Using Enzyme and Dry Yeast for Optimization of Bioethanol Production from Empty Fruit Bunch. Energy Procedia 68: 107–116.    
  • 14. Cotana F, Cavalaglio G, Gelosia M, et al. (2015) A comparison between SHF and SSSF processes from cardoon for ethanol production. Ind Crop Prod 69: 424–432.    
  • 15. Gonçalves FA, Ruiz HA, da Costa Nogueira C, et al. (2014) Comparison of delignified coconuts waste and cactus for fuel-ethanol production by the simultaneous and semi-simultaneous saccharification and fermentation strategies. Fuel 131: 66–76.    
  • 16. Ishola MM, Jahandideh A, Haidarian B, et al. (2013) Simultaneous saccharification, filtration and fermentation (SSFF): A novel method for bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 133: 68–73.    
  • 17. Liu G, Zhang Q, Li H, et al. (2017) Dry biorefining maximizes the potentials of simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation for cellulosic ethanol production. Biotechnol Bioeng 115: 60–69.
  • 18. den Haan R, van Rensburg E, Rose SH, et al. (2015) Progress and challenges in the engineering of non-cellulolytic microorganisms for consolidated bioprocessing. Curr Opin Biotechnol 33: 15–22.    
  • 19. Horisawa S, Ando H, Ariga O (2015) Direct ethanol production from cellulosic materials by consolidated biological processing using the wood rot fungus Schizophyllum commune. Bioresour Technol 197: 37–41.    
  • 20. Huang J, Chen D, Wei Y, et al. (2014) Direct ethanol production from lignocellulosic sugars and sugarcane bagasse by a recombinant Trichoderma reesei strain HJ48. Sci World J 2014: 798683.
  • 21. Loaces I, Schein S, Noya F (2017) Ethanol production by Escherichia coli from Arundo donax biomass under SSF, SHF or CBP process configurations and in situ production of a multifunctional glucanase and xylanase. Bioresour Technol 224: 307–313.    
  • 22. Bridgwater AV (2003) Renewable Fuels and Chemicals by Thermal Processing of Biomass. Chem Eng J 91: 87–102.    
  • 23. Acharya B, Roy P, Dutta A (2014) Review of syngas fermentation processes for bioethanol. Biofuels 5: 551–564.    
  • 24. Devarapalli M, Atiyeh HK (2015) A review of conversion processes for bioethanol production with a focus on syngas fermentation. Biofuel Res J 7: 268–280.
  • 25. Abubackar HN, Veiga MC, Kennes C (2018) Production of acids and alcohols from syngas in a two-stage continuous fermentation process. Bioresour Technol 253: 227–234.    
  • 26. Fernández-Naveira Á, Veiga MC, Kennes C (2017) Effect of pH control on the anaerobic H-B-E fermentation of syngas in bioreactors. J Chem Technol Biot 92: 1178–1185.    
  • 27. Devarapalli M, Atiyeh HK, Phillips JR (2016) Ethanol production during semi-continuous syngas fermentation in a trickle bed reactor using Clostridium ragsdalei. Bioresour Technol 209: 56–65.    
  • 28. Sun X, Atiyeh HK, Kumar A, et al. (2018) Enhanced ethanol production by Clostridium ragsdalei from syngas by incorporating biochar in the fermentation medium. Bioresour Technol 247: 291–301.    
  • 29. Liu K, Atiyeh HK, Stevenson BS, et al. (2014) Continuous syngas fermentation for the production of ethanol, n-propanol and n-butanol. Bioresour Technol 151: 69–77.    
  • 30. Kumar S, Cho JH, Park J, et al. (2013) Advances in diesel-alcohol blends and their effects on the performance and emissions of diesel engines. Renew Sust Energ Rev 22: 46–72.    
  • 31. Elfasakhany A (2017) Investigations on performance and pollutant emissions of spark-ignition engines fueled with n-butanol-, isobutanol-, ethanol-, methanol-, and acetone-gasoline blends: A comparative study. Renew Sust Energ Rev 71: 404–413.    
  • 32. Xue C, Zhang X, Wang J, et al. (2017) The advanced strategy for enhancing biobutanol production and high-efficient product recovery with reduced wastewater generation. Biotechnol Biofuels 10: 148.    
  • 33. Xue C, Zhao J, Chen L (2017) Recent advances and state-of-the-art strategies in strain and process engineering for biobutanol production by Clostridium acetobutylicum. Biotechnol Adv 35: 310–322.    
  • 34. Suresh M, Jawahar CP, Richard A (2018) A review on biodiesel production, combustion, performance, and emission characteristics of non-edible oils in variable compression ratio diesel engine using biodiesel and its blends. Renew Sust Energ Rev 92: 38–49.    
  • 35. Saluja RS, Kumar V, Sham R (2016) Stability of biodiesel-a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 62: 866–881.    
  • 36. Knothe G, Razon LF (2017) Biodiesel fuels. Prog Energ Combust 58: 36–59.    
  • 37. Abdullah SHYS, Hanapi NHM, Azid A, et al. (2017) A review of biomass-derived heterogeneous catalyst for a sustainable biodiesel production. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70: 1040–1051.    
  • 38. Islam A, Taufiq-Yap YH, Chan ES, et al. (2014) Advances in solid-catalytic and non-catalytic technologies for biodiesel production. Energ Convers Manage 88: 1200–1218.    
  • 39. Okoro OV, Sun Z, Birch J (2018) Catalyst-Free Biodiesel Production Methods: A Comparative Technical and Environmental Evaluation. Sustainability 10: 127.    
  • 40. Othman MF, Adam A, Najafi G, et al. (2017) Green fuel as alternative fuel for diesel engine: A review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 80: 694–709.    
  • 41. Vonortas A, Papayannakos N (2014) Comparative analysis of biodiesel versus green diesel. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Energy Environ 3: 3–23.    
  • 42. Manchanda T, Tyagi R, Sharma DK (2018) Comparison of fuel characteristics of green (renewable) diesel with biodiesel obtainable from algal oil and vegetable oil. Energy Sources Part A 40: 54–59.    
  • 43. Shamsul NS, Kamarudin SK, Rahman NA, et al. (2014) An overview on the production of bio-methanol as potential renewable energy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 33: 578–588.    
  • 44. Minteer SD (2011) Biochemical production of other bioalcohols: Biomethanol, biopropanol, bioglycerol, and bioethylene glycol, In: Rafael Luque, Juan Campelo, James Clark (Editors.), Handbook of Biofuels Production, Woodhead Publishing 11: 258–265.
  • 45. Dalena F, Senatore A, Marino A, et al. (2018) Methanol Production and Applications: An Overview. Methanol 1: 3–28.
  • 46. Iaquaniello G, Centi G, Salladini A, et al. (2017) Waste-to-methanol: Process and economics assessment. Bioresour Technol 243: 611–619.    
  • 47. Svanberg M, Ellis J, Lundgren J, et al. (2018) Renewable methanol as a fuel for the shipping industry. Renew Sust Energ Rev 94: 1217–1228.    
  • 48. Schmitz N, Burger J, Ströfer E (2016) From methanol to the oxygenated diesel fuel poly(oxymethylene) dimethyl ether: An assessment of the production costs. Fuel 185: 67–72.    
  • 49. Park SH, Lee CS (2014) Applicability of dimethyl ether (DME) in a compression ignition engine as an alternative fuel. Energ Convers Manage 86: 848–863.    
  • 50. Lautenschütz L, Oestreich D, Seidenspinner P, et al. (2016) Physico-chemical properties and fuel characteristics of oxymethylene dialkyl ethers. Fuel 173: 129–137.    
  • 51. Thomas G, Feng B, Veeraragavan A (2014) Emissions from DME combustion in diesel engines and their implications on meeting future emission norms: A review. Fuel Process Technol 119: 286–304.    
  • 52. Kim HJ, Park SH (2016) Optimization study on exhaust emissions and fuel consumption in a dimethyl ether (DME) fueled diesel engine. Fuel 182: 541–549.    
  • 53. Bîldea CS, Győrgy R, Brunchi CC, et al. (2017) Optimal design of intensified processes for DME synthesis. Comput Chem Eng 105: 142–151.    
  • 54. Azizi Z, Rezaeimanesh M, Tohidian T, et al. (2014) Dimethyl ether: A review of technologies and production challenges. Chem Eng Process 82: 150–172.    
  • 55. Baranowski CJ, Bahmanpour AM, Kröcher O (2017) Catalytic synthesis of polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers (OME): A review. Appl Catal B-Environ 217: 407–420.    
  • 56. Parvez AM, Wu T, Li S, et al. (2018) Bio-DME production based on conventional and CO2-enhanced gasification of biomass: A comparative study on exergy and environmental impacts. Biomass Bioenerg 110: 105–113.    
  • 57. Mythili R, Venkatachalam P, Subramanian P (2013) Characterization of bioresidues for bio-oil production through pyrolysis. Bioresour Technol 138: 71–78.    
  • 58. Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, et al. (2005) Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 96: 673–686.    
  • 59. Czernik S, Bridgwater AV (2004) Overview of applications of biomass fast pyrolysis oil. Energ Fuel 18: 590–598.    
  • 60. Oasmaa A, Czernik S (1999) Fuel Oil Quality of Biomass Pyrolysis Oils: State of the Art for the End Users. Energ Fuel 13: 914–921.    
  • 61. Lehto J, Oasmaa A, Solantausta Y, et al. (2014) Review of fuel oil quality and combustion of fast pyrolysis bio-oils from lignocellulosic biomass. Appl Energ 116: 178–190.    
  • 62. Hornung A, Apfelbacher A, Sagi S (2011) Intermediate pyrolysis: A sustainable biomass-to-energy concept-Biothermal valorisation of biomass (BtVB) process. J Sci Ind Res 70: 664–667.
  • 63. Bridgwater AV (2012) Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading. Biomass Bioenerg 38: 68–94.    
  • 64. Gollakota ARK, Kishore N, Gu S (2018) A review on hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass. Renew Sust Energ Rev 81: 1378–1392.    
  • 65. Huang YF, Chiueh PT, Lo SL (2016) A review on microwave pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Sust Environ Res 26: 103–109.
  • 66. Furimsky E (2000) Catalytic hydrodeoxygenation. Appl Catal A-Gen 199: 147–190.    
  • 67. Gollakota ARK, Reddy M, Subramanyam MD, et al. (2016) A review on the upgradation techniques of pyrolysis oil. Renew Sust Energ Rev 58: 1543–1568.    
  • 68. Bridgwater AV (2012) Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading. Biomass Bioenerg 38: 68–94.    
  • 69. Elliott D, Baker E (1983) Biomass Liquefaction Product Analysis and Upgrading. Pacific Northwest Lab: Richland, WA, USA.
  • 70. Baker EG, Elliott DC (1988) Catalytic hydrotreating of biomass derived oils, In: Soltes J, Milne TA, Pyrolysis oils from biomass e producing, analysing and upgrading, 228–240.
  • 71. Elliott DC, Hart TR, Neuenschwander GG, et al. (2012) Catalytic hydroprocessing of fast pyrolysis bio-oil from pine sawdust. Energ Fuel 26: 3891–3896.    
  • 72. Wildschut J, Mahfud FH, Venderbosch RH (2009) Hydrotreatment of Fast Pyrolysis Oil Using Heterogeneous Noble-Metal Catalysts. Ind Eng Chem Res 48: 10324–10334.    
  • 73. Chaiwat W, Gunawan R, Gholizadeh M, et al. (2013) Upgrading of bio-oil into advanced biofuels and chemicals. Part II. Importance of holdup of heavy species during the hydrotreatment of bio-oil in a continuous packed-bed catalytic reactor. Fuel 112: 302–310.
  • 74. Wildschut J, Melian-Cabrera I, Heeres HJ (2010) Catalyst studies on the hydrotreatment of fast pyrolysis oil. Appl Catal B-Environ 99: 298–306.    
  • 75. Oh S, Choi HS, Choi IG, et al. (2017) Evaluation of hydrodeoxygenation reactivity of pyrolysis bio-oil with various Ni-based catalysts for improvement of fuel properties. RSC Adv 7: 15116–15126.    
  • 76. Xu Y, Wang T, Ma L, et al. (2010) Upgrading of the liquid fuel from fast pyrolysis of biomass over MoNi/γ-Al2O3 catalysts. Appl Energ 87: 2886–2891.    
  • 77. Cheng S, Wei L, Julson J, et al. (2017) Upgrading pyrolysis bio-oil through hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) using non-sulfided Fe-Co/SiO2 catalyst. Energ Convers Manage 150: 331–342.    
  • 78. Guo C, Rao KTV, Reyhanitash E, et al. (2016) Novel inexpensive transition metal phosphide catalysts for upgrading of pyrolysis oil via hydrodeoxygenation. React Eng Kinet Catal 62: 3664–3672.
  • 79. Guo C, Rao KTV, Yuan Z (2018) Hydrodeoxygenation of fast pyrolysis oil with novel activated carbon-supported NiP and CoP catalysts. Chem Eng Sci 178: 248–259.    
  • 80. Bridgwater AV (2012) Upgrading biomass fast pyrolysis liquids. TC-Biomass 2011 Special Issue.
  • 81. Williams PT, Horne PA (1995) The influence of catalyst regeneration on the composition of zeolite-upgraded biomass pyrolysis oils. Fuel 74: 1839–1851.    
  • 82. Williams PT, Nugranad N (2000) Comparison of products from the pyrolysis and catalytic pyrolysis of rice husks. Energy 25: 493–513.    
  • 83. Li HY, Yan YJ, Ren ZW (2008) Online upgrading of organic vapours from the fast pyrolysis of biomass. J Fuel Chem Technol 36: 666–671.    
  • 84. Iisa K, French RJ, Orton KA, et al. (2017) Production of low-oxygen bio-oil via ex situ catalytic fast pyrolysis and hydrotreating. Fuel 207: 413–422.    
  • 85. Williams PT, Horne PA (1995) The influence of catalyst type on the composition of upgraded biomass pyrolysis oils. J Anal Appl Pyrol 31: 39–61.    
  • 86. Antonakou E, Lappas A, Nilsen MH, et al. (2006) Evaluation of various types of Al-MCM-41 materials as catalysts in biomass pyrolysis for the production of bio-fuels and chemicals. Fuel 85: 2202–2212.    
  • 87. Nokkosmäki MI, Kuoppala ET, Leppämäki EA, et al. (1998) A novel test method for cracking catalysts. J Anal Appl Pyrol 44: 193–204.    
  • 88. Pütün E (2010) Catalytic pyrolysis of biomass: Effects of pyrolysis temperature, sweeping gas flow rate and MgO catalyst. Energy 35: 2761–2766.    
  • 89. Sitzmann J (2009) Upgrading of fast pyrolysis oils by hot filtration, Available from: https://research.aston.ac.uk/portal/en/theses/upgrading-of-fast-pyrolysis-oils-by-hot-filtration(28597c38-605b-44a3-917c-3748fa8da8ab).html.
  • 90. Xiu S, Shahbazi A (2012) Bio-oil production and upgrading research: A review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16: 4406–4414.    
  • 91. Baloch HA, Nizamuddin S, Siddiqui MTH, et al. (2018) Recent advances in production and upgrading of bio-oil from biomass: A critical overview. J Environ Chem Eng 6: 5101–5118.    
  • 92. Wang JJ, Chang J, Fan J (2010) Upgrading of Bio-oil by Catalytic Esterification and Determination of Acid Number for Evaluating Esterification Degree. Energ Fuel 24: 3251–3255.    
  • 93. Liu Y, Li Z, Leahy JJ (2015) Catalytically Upgrading Bio-oil via Esterification. Energ Fuel 29: 3691–3698.    
  • 94. Wu L, Hu X, Wang S (2018) Acid-treatment of bio-oil in methanol: The distinct catalytic behaviours of a mineral acid catalyst and a solid acid catalyst. Fuel 212: 412–421.    
  • 95. Lin BJ, Chen WH, Budzianowski WM, et al. (2016) Emulsification analysis of bio-oil and diesel under various combinations of emulsifiers. Appl Energ 178: 746–757.    
  • 96. Gutiérrez-Antonio C, Gómez-Castro FI, de Lira-Flores JA, et al. (2017) A review on the production processes of renewable jet fuel. Renew Sust Energ Rev 79: 709–729.    
  • 97. UOP Honeywell (2017) Honeywell Green Jet Fuel. Available from: https://www.uop.com/processing-solutions/renewables/green-jet-fuel/ [accessed October 31, 2018].
  • 98. Robota HJ, Alger JC, Shafer L (2013) Converting Algal Triglycerides to Diesel and HEFA Jet Fuel Fractions. Energ Fuel 27: 985–996.    
  • 99. Choi IH, Lee JS, Kim CU, et al. (2018) Production of bio-jet fuel range alkanes from catalytic deoxygenation of Jatropha fatty acids on a WOx/Pt/TiO2 catalyst. Fuel 215: 675–685.    
  • 100. Zhao X, Wei L, Julson J, et al. (2015) Catalytic cracking of non-edible sunflower oil over ZSM-5 for hydrocarbon bio-jet fuel. New Biotechnol 32: 300.    
  • 101. Liu S, Zhu Q, Guan Q, et al. (2015) Bio-aviation fuel production from hydroprocessing castor oil promoted by the nickel-based bifunctional catalysts. Bioresour Technol 183: 93–100.    
  • 102. Li T, Cheng J, Huang R, et al. (2015) Conversion of waste cooking oil to jet biofuel with nickel-based mesoporous zeolite Y catalyst. Bioresour Technol 197: 289–294.    
  • 103. Toba M, Abe Y, Kuramochi H, et al. (2011) Hydrodeoxygenation of waste vegetable oil over sulfide catalysts. Catal Today 164: 533–537.    
  • 104. Tijmensen MJA, Faaij APC, Hamelinck CN (2002) Exploration of the possibilities for production of Fischer-Tropsch liquids and power via biomass gasification. Biomass Bioenerg 23: 129–152.    
  • 105. Larson ED, Jin H, Celik FE (2009) Large-scale gasification-based co-production of fuels and electricity from switchgrass. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 3: 174–194.    
  • 106. Hamelinck CN, Faaij APC, den Uil H, et al. (2004) Production of FT transportation fuels from biomass; technical options, process analysis and optimization, and development potential. Energy 29: 1743–1771.    
  • 107. Choudhury HA, Chakma S, Moholkar VS (2015) Chapter 14-Biomass Gasification Integrated Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis: Perspectives, Opportunities and Challenges, In: Pandey A, Bhaskar T, Stöcker M, Sukumaran RK (Editors.), Recent Advances in Thermo-Chemical Conversion of Biomass, Elsevier, Boston, 383–435.
  • 108. Susastriawan AAP, Saptoadi H (2017) Small-scale downdraft gasifiers for biomass gasification: A review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 76: 989–1003.    
  • 109. Dry ME (2004) Present and future applications of the Fischer-Tropsch process. Appl Catal A-Gen 276: 1–3.    
  • 110. den Breejen JP, Sietsma JRA, Friedrich H, et al. (2010) Design of supported of cobalt catalysts with maximum activity for the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. J Catal 270: 146–152.    
  • 111. Davis BH (2009) Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: Reaction mechanisms for iron catalysts. Catal Today 141: 25–33.    
  • 112. Subiranas M, Schaub A (2007) Combining Fischer-Tropsch (FT) and hydrocarbon reactions under FT reaction conditions-Catalyst and reactor studies with Co or Fe and Pt/ZSM-5. Int J Chem React Eng 5: A78.
  • 113. Rosyadi E, Priyanto U, Roesyadi A, et al. (2011) Biofuel production by hydrocracking of biomass FT wax over NiMo/Al2O3-SiO2 catalyst. J Jpn Inst Energy 90: 1171–1176.    
  • 114. Hillestad M, Ostadi M, Alamo Serrano Gd (2018) Improving carbon efficiency and profitability of the biomass to liquid process with hydrogen from renewable power. Fuel 234: 1431–1451.    
  • 115. Viguié JC, Ullrich N, Porot P, et al. (2013) BioTfueL project: Targeting the development of second-generation biodiesel and biojet fuels. Oil Gas Sci Technol 68: 953–946.
  • 116. Hanaoka T, Miyazawa T, Shimura K, et al. (2015) Jet fuel synthesis in hydrocracking of Fischer-Tropsch product over Pt-loaded zeolite catalysts prepared using microemulsions. Fuel Process Technol 129: 139–146.    
  • 117. LanzaTech (2018) UK Government Grant to Develop World First Waste Carbon to Jet Fuel Project. Available from: http://www.lanzatech.com/lanzatech-virgin-atlantic-secure-uk-government-grant-develop-world-first-waste-carbon-jet-fuel-project-uk/ [assessed November 1, 2018].
  • 118. de Freitas LC, Kanekov S (2011) Ethanol demand under the flex-fuel technology regime in Brazil. Energy Economics 33:1146-1154.    
  • 119. Hamelinck CN, Faaij APC (2006) Outlook for advanced biofuels. Energ Policy 34: 3268–3283.    
  • 120. Carriquiry MA, Du X, Timilsina GR (2011) Second generation biofuels: Economics and policies. Energ Policy 39: 4222–4234.    
  • 121. Fivga A, Dimitriou I (2018) Pyrolysis of plastic waste for production of heavy fuel substitute: A techno-economic assessment. Energy 149: 865–874.    
  • 122. Global Syngas Technologies Council. Available from: https://www.globalsyngas.org/resources/the-gasification-industry/ [assessed November 1, 2018].

 

This article has been cited by

  • 1. Miloud Ouadi, Antzela Fivga, Hessam Jahangiri, Muhammad Saghir, Andreas Hornung, A Review of the Valorization of Paper Industry Wastes by Thermochemical Conversion, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00635
  • 2. Arianna Callegari, Silvia Bolognesi, Daniele Cecconet, Andrea G. Capodaglio, Production technologies, current role, and future prospects of biofuels feedstocks: A state-of-the-art review, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2019, 1, 10.1080/10643389.2019.1629801
  • 3. Ayesha Shahid, Abd ur Rehman, Muhammad Usman, Muhammad Umer Farooq Ashraf, Muhammad Rizwan Javed, Aqib Zafar Khan, Saba Shahid Gill, Muhammad Aamer Mehmood, Engineering the metabolic pathways of lipid biosynthesis to develop robust microalgal strains for biodiesel production, Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry, 2019, 10.1002/bab.1812
  • 4. A. Mahboubi, C. Uwineza, W. Doyen, H. De Wever, M.J. Taherzadeh, Intensification of lignocellulosic bioethanol production process using continuous double-staged immersed membrane bioreactors, Bioresource Technology, 2019, 122314, 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122314

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved