Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Studying young people’ views on deployment of renewable energy sources in Iran through the lenses of Social Cognitive Theory

1 Risk and Resilience Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Laxenburg, Austria
2 Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Switzerland
3 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Ahwaz, Iran
4 Sepehar University, Esfahan, Iran

Topical Section: Energy Transition and Low Carbon Technologies

Renewable energy sources (RES) have potentials to address goals of climate change mitigation at the global level. Iran has abundant RES potentials and investment into renewable energy sources can contribute to its socio-economic development and to diversification of its energy mix. Economic and technical capacities but also human factors, such as stakeholders’ views, public and social acceptance, as well as willingness to use RES, willingness to pay for their deployment and to participate in decision-making processes on energy transition, are crucial factors for deployment of RES at scale. These human factors impact development and implementation of energy transition at the national and local governance levels. Deployment of new technology and energy transition can lead to conflicting views, believes and risks perceptions among involved stakeholders but also among people affected by deployment of new technology infrastructure deployment. To be sustainable and acceptable by all social groups, such process should be based on understanding of positions of different stakeholders and development of compromise solutions. It is crucial to understand the views of young people on deployment of RES as young people represent a significant share of population and are future decision makers. Their support and willingness to use RES will be a significant driver for RES deployment in short and medium term. Based on socio cognitive theory this paper examines the patters of behavior of young adults in relation to energy use. The results show positive influence of self-rewarding to encourage young adults to participate in energy transition. Another important driver is expectation of social outcome, which involves existing social norms in the community. Trust to the source of information is another important driver and the level of information about RES has an important influence on the willingness to use them.
  Article Metrics

Keywords renewable energy sources; human factors of energy transition; energy policy in Iran; young people

Citation: Nadejda Komendantova, Masoud Yazdanpanah, Roshanak Shafiei. Studying young people’ views on deployment of renewable energy sources in Iran through the lenses of Social Cognitive Theory. AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(2): 216-228. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.2.216


  • 1. IEA (2002) World Energy Outlook, chapter 13, 365–389.
  • 2. Yazdanpanah M, Komendantova N, Ardestani RS (2015) Governance of energy transition in Iran: Investigating public acceptance and willingness to use renewable energy sources through socio-psychological model. Renew Sust Energ Rev 45: 565–573.    
  • 3. Komendantova N, Yazdanpanah M (2016) Impacts of Human Factors on Willingness to Use Renewable Energy Sources in the Middle East and North African Region. Environ Energy Econ Int Res 1: 173–184.
  • 4. British Petroleum (2013) BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2013. Available from: http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/statisticalreview/statistical_review_of_world_energy_2013.
  • 5. SUNA (2014) About renewable energies. Renewable energy organization of Iran.
  • 6. Alamdari P, Nematollahi O, Alemrajabi AA (2013) Solar energy potentials in Iran: A review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 21: 778–788.    
  • 7. Fadai D, Esfandabadi ZS, Abbasi A (2011) Analyzing the causes of non-development of renewable energy-related industries in Iran. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15: 2690–2695.    
  • 8. Hosseini SE, Andwari AM, Wahid MA, et al. (2013) A review on green energy potentials in Iran. Renew Sust Energ Rev 27: 533–545.    
  • 9. Ghobadian B, Najafi G, Rahimi H, et al. (2009) Future of renewable energies in Iran. Rene Sust Energ Rev 13: 689–695.    
  • 10. Mostafaeipour A, Jadidi M, Mohammadi K, et al. (2014) An analysis of wind energy potential and economic evaluation in Zahedan, Iran. Renew Sust Energ Rev 30: 641–650.    
  • 11. Wieser R, Pickle S, Goldman C (1998) Renewable energy policy and electricity restructuring: A California case study. Energy Policy 26: 465–475.    
  • 12. Kunreuther H, Gupta S, Bosetti V, et al. (2014) Integrated Risk and Uncertainty Assessment of Climate Change Response Policies, In: Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, et al. Author, Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • 13. Sovacool BK (2014) Energy Security, Ed., London: Sage, Six Volumes,.
  • 14. Wheeler SA (2008) The barriers to further adoption of organic farming and genetic engineering in Australia: Views of agricultural professionals and their information sources. Renew Agric Food Syst 23: 161–170.
  • 15. Komendantova N, Voccciante M, Battaglini A (2015) Can the BestGrid Process Improve Stakeholder Involvement in Electricity Transmission Projects? Energies 8: 9407–9433.    
  • 16. Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action. J Appl Psychol 12: 169.
  • 17. Lorraine SWPD, Janet-Buckworth F, Timothy EKPD, et al. (2000) Characteristics of exercise behavior among college students: Application of social cognitive theory to predicting stage of change. Prev Med 31: 494–505.    
  • 18. Winters ER, Petosa RL, Charlton TE (2003) Using social cognitive theory to explain discretionary, "leisure-time" physical exercise among high school students. J Adolesc Health 32: 436–442.    
  • 19. Plotnikoff RC, Costigan SA, Karunamuni N, et al. (2013) Social cognitive theories used to explain physical activity behavior in adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med 56: 245–253.
  • 20. Zundert RMPV, Nijhof LM, Engels RCME (2009) Testing social cognitive theory as a theoretical framework to predict smoking relapse among daily smoking adolescents. Addict Behav 34: 281–286.    
  • 21. Young HN, Lipowski EE, Cline RJ (2005) Using social cognitive theory to explain consumers' behavioral intentions in response to direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising. Res Soc Adm Pharm 1: 270–288.    
  • 22. Stallones L, Acosta MS, Sample P, et al. (2009) Perspectives on safety and health among migrant and seasonal farmworkers in the United States and Mexico: A qualitative field study. J Rural Health 25: 219–225.    
  • 23. Rinderknecht K, Smith C (2004) Social cognitive theory in an after-school nutrition intervention for urban Native American youth. J Nutr Educ Behav 36: 298–304.    
  • 24. Larose R, Mastro D, Eastin MS (2001) Understanding internet usage: A social-cognitive approach to uses and gratifications. Soc Sci Comput Rev 19: 395–413.    
  • 25. Wang SL, Wu PY (2008) The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: The social cognitive perspective. Comput Educ 51: 1589–1598.    
  • 26. Phipps M, Ozanne LK, Luchs MG, et al. (2013) Understanding the inherent complexity of sustainable consumption: A social cognitive framework. J Bus Res 66: 1227–1234.    
  • 27. Hawley L, Harker D, Harker M (2010) A social cognitive approach to tackle inactivity and obesity in young Australians. J Bus Res 63: 116–120.    
  • 28. Yazdanpanah M, Komendantova N, Shirazi ZN, et al. (2015) Green or in between? Examining youth perceptions of renewable energy in Iran. Energy Res Soc Sci 8: 78–85.
  • 29. Mousavi B, Lopez N, Biona J, et al. (2017) Driving forces of Iran's CO2 emissions from energy consumption: An LMDI decomposition approach. Appl Energy 206: 804–814.    
  • 30. Armitage CJ, Conner M (2001) Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A Meta-Analytic Review. Br J Soc Psychol 40: 471–499.    
  • 31. Komendantova N, Battaglini A (2016) Beyond Decide-Announce-Defend (DAD) and Not-in-My-Backyard (NIMBY) models? Addressing the social and public acceptance of electric transmission lines in Germany. Energy Res Soc Sci 22: 224–231.
  • 32. Komendantova N, Riegler M, Neumueller S (2018) Of transitions and models: Community engagement, democracy, and empowerment in the Austrian energy transition. Energy Res Soc Sci 39: 141–151.    
  • 33. Bakhtiyari Z, Yazdanpanah M, Forouzani M, et al. (2017) Intention of agricultural professionals toward biofuels in Iran: Implications for energy security, society, and policy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 69: 341–349.    


This article has been cited by

  • 1. Jafar Yaghoubi, Masoud Yazdanpanah, Nadejda Komendantova, Iranian agriculture advisors’ perception and intention toward biofuel: green way toward energy security, rural development and climate change mitigation, Renewable Energy, 2018, 10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.081
  • 2. Elham Bozorgparvar, Masoud Yazdanpanah, Masoumeh Forouzani, Bahman Khosravipour, Cleaner and greener livestock production: Appraising producers’ perceptions regarding renewable energy in Iran, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.280
  • 3. Ramón Fernando Colmenares-Quintero, Juliana Maria Benavides-Castillo, Natalia Rojas, Kim E. Stansfield, Marco Hubert, Community perceptions, beliefs and acceptability of renewable energies projects: A systematic mapping study, Cogent Psychology, 2020, 7, 1, 10.1080/23311908.2020.1715534

Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved