Research article

Residential consumer perspectives of effective peak electricity demand reduction interventions as an approach for low carbon communities.

  • Internationally, policy makers have been trying to find ways of changing residential electricity use through improved energy efficiency or by means of behaviour change. Drawing on evidence from an Australian project undertaken in a community of approximately 2200 residents, this paper reviews how a combination of interventions have successfully reduced electricity demand levels to below that of pre-intervention levels. Employing a qualitative methodology and using this successful project as the basis of a case study, this research explores the effectiveness of the electricity demand reduction interventions from the perspective of residents from 22 households. By combining and tailoring interventions to the specific needs and motivations of individual householders, this study demonstrates how a multi-pronged and integrated approach can be effective in addressing the multi-faceted challenge of energy efficiency and behaviour change. The experience with this Australian residential community in achieving an ongoing reduction in electricity use is rare and the findings from the research are internationally relevant in informing policy and practice directions for achieving government-set lower carbon emission targets. This research has important implications for addressing issues related to total consumption and peak demand reduction, both financial and environmental, for the benefit of energy providers and consumers.

    Citation: Peter Morris, Desley Vine, Laurie Buys. Residential consumer perspectives of effective peak electricity demand reduction interventions as an approach for low carbon communities.[J]. AIMS Energy, 2016, 4(3): 536-556. doi: 10.3934/energy.2016.3.536

    Related Papers:

    [1] David V. McQueen, Erma Manoncourt, Yuri N. Cartier, Irina Dinca, Ülla-Karin Nurm . The Transferability of Health Promotion and Education Approaches Between Non-communicable Diseases and Communicable Diseases—an Analysis of Evidence. AIMS Public Health, 2014, 1(4): 182-198. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2014.4.182
    [2] Chan-Young Kwon, Boram Lee . The efficacy of acupuncture on suicidal behavior: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. AIMS Public Health, 2022, 9(4): 651-660. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2022046
    [3] Jessie-Lee McIsaac, Grace Warner, Logan Lawrence, Robin Urquhart, Sheri Price, Jacqueline Gahagan, Mary McNally, Lois A Jackson . The application of implementation science theories for population health: A critical interpretive synthesis. AIMS Public Health, 2018, 5(1): 13-30. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2018.1.13
    [4] Afeez Abiola Hazzan, Joyce O Hazzan, Mark Oremus . Measuring quality and level of care provided by family caregivers of persons with dementia: protocol for a systematic review of validated instruments. AIMS Public Health, 2021, 8(2): 206-212. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021016
    [5] Wanda Martin, Bernie Pauly, Marjorie MacDonald . Situational Analysis for Complex Systems: Methodological Development in Public Health Research. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(1): 94-109. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.1.94
    [6] Mehreen Tariq, Margaret Haworth-Brockman, Seyed M Moghadas . Ten years of Pan-InfORM: modelling research for public health in Canada. AIMS Public Health, 2021, 8(2): 265-274. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021020
    [7] Karen E. Lamb, Lukar E. Thornton, Ester Cerin, Kylie Ball . Statistical Approaches Used to Assess the Equity of Access to Food Outlets: A Systematic Review. AIMS Public Health, 2015, 2(3): 358-401. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.3.358
    [8] Siti Roshaidai Mohd Arifin, Helen Cheyne, Margaret Maxwell . Review of the prevalence of postnatal depression across cultures. AIMS Public Health, 2018, 5(3): 260-295. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2018.3.260
    [9] Kai Cheng, Jiangtao Wang, Jian Liu, Xiangsheng Zhang, Yuanyuan Shen, Hang Su . Public health implications of computer-aided diagnosis and treatment technologies in breast cancer care. AIMS Public Health, 2023, 10(4): 867-895. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023057
    [10] Joyce Lo, Sharan Jaswal, Matthew Yeung, Vijay Kumar Chattu, Ali Bani-Fatemi, Aaron Howe, Amin Yazdani, Basem Gohar, Douglas P. Gross, Behdin Nowrouzi-Kia . A systematic review of the literature: Gender-based violence in the construction and natural resources industry. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(2): 654-666. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024033
  • Internationally, policy makers have been trying to find ways of changing residential electricity use through improved energy efficiency or by means of behaviour change. Drawing on evidence from an Australian project undertaken in a community of approximately 2200 residents, this paper reviews how a combination of interventions have successfully reduced electricity demand levels to below that of pre-intervention levels. Employing a qualitative methodology and using this successful project as the basis of a case study, this research explores the effectiveness of the electricity demand reduction interventions from the perspective of residents from 22 households. By combining and tailoring interventions to the specific needs and motivations of individual householders, this study demonstrates how a multi-pronged and integrated approach can be effective in addressing the multi-faceted challenge of energy efficiency and behaviour change. The experience with this Australian residential community in achieving an ongoing reduction in electricity use is rare and the findings from the research are internationally relevant in informing policy and practice directions for achieving government-set lower carbon emission targets. This research has important implications for addressing issues related to total consumption and peak demand reduction, both financial and environmental, for the benefit of energy providers and consumers.


    Integration of distributed renewable energy resources (DRER) and distributed energy storage devices (DESD) to the power system networks urges enhanced power electronic solutions [1]. Microgrids are one such application that makes use of power electronics converters. Microgrids facilitate increased integration of DRER and DESD to the power network. This reduces network congestion, improve the efficiency and reliability of the utility network [2,3]. Control requirements of the microgrids require additional power electronics converters to be interfaced to the medium voltage (MV) grid if the conventional low frequency transformers (LFT) are used [4,5,6].

    The solid state transformer (SST) is identified as the newest member of the FACTS devices that incorporates multiple power conversion stages providing galvanic isolation with the use of a high frequency transformer (HFT) [7,8]. Compact structure of HFT makes it a good option to replace the LFT [8]. The 'intelligence' or the 'smart' feature of the SST is added by its controllability due to the power electronics interface [8]. In addition to the conventional features of LFT such as isolation and voltage conversion, an SST achieves better power management and power quality [3,4,6,7]. Active power flow control, reactive power compensate ion, voltage regulation, power quality improvement, and fault current limiting are the other SST functionalities that can be integrated into a microgrid [6,9,10,11].

    In [11,12], SST technologies, and concepts for power distribution system are reviewed while [13] presents an analysis of SST topologies and controllers. In [14], applicability of SST for traction and smart grid systems with possible modular topologies, existing SST prototypes and their schematics are presented. In this paper, we contribute in reviewing how the SST achieves the requirements of microgrid system for the future distribution network, and the possible design and control architectures for integrating microgrids with the SST. Advantages and disadvantages of each control and design architectures are also reviewed. Existing SST based systems are reviewed to investigate on how far the envisioned SST based microgrid systems have moved towards practical implementation.

    The paper is organized as follows. In Section II the applicability of SST for microgrids and how the demanded requirements of the microgrid are satisfied by the SST is discussed. Section III introduces possible and existing architectures for integrating an SST to a microgrid along with a classification. The advantages and disadvantages of each architecture in the implementation point of view are covered under this section. Basic power flow control of a SST and the control strategies adopted in SST based microgrids are reviewed in Section IV. Furthermore, the coordination of SSTs with multiple AC/DC converters is discussed under Section IV. Section V presents three major experimental setups which demonstrate the SST microgrid concept in implementation as prototypes. The paper concludes with suggestions for possible future research directions.

    Integration of SSTs for microgrid applications for improved capabilities have been a popular area of study recently. In addition to the microgrids, the possibility of integrating SSTs with traction systems [18], DRER [19,20,21] and substations [22,23] are also discussed in the literature. The architecture and the control capabilities of SST facilitate the implementation of the microgrids.

    As presented in Table 1, there are several key requirements in a microgrid conforming to the context of the future power system [2,3,11]. Newly demanded performance and functionality requirements of a microgrid given in Table 1 cannot be fully covered by the conventional electric power supply concept based on LFT [11]. Therein, SST based microgrids have emerged as a desirable solution to accomplish these stringent performance requirements as explained below.

    Table 1.  Newly demanded requirements of microgrids.
    Context Requirements of the microgrid
    Integration to mains grid Isolation
    Islanded operation
    Transfer between operating modes
    Performance Address power quality issues in distribution network
    High multi-objective performance in demand side
    Protection levels
    Integration of sources, loads and storage Store and control renewable energy sources
    Heavy use of DC loads such as LEDs and electric vehicles to save energy
    Reduce CO2 emissions

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The functional block diagram of the three-stage SST is shown in Figure 1. AC-DC stage (rectification), DC-DC stage (isolation) with HFT and back end DC-AC stage (inversion) constitute the three-stage SST [11]. The presence of multiple ports in the three-stage SST is an attractive feature for the microgrids. The low voltage DC (LVDC) link can be used to directly integrate the DRER, DSED or DC loads. Depending on the voltage levels DC/DC converters are to be used whenever necessary. The DC microgrids are more beneficial than AC microgrids in terms of the efficiency, provided that the system employs DC loads, hence fewer conversion stages. With the recent developments of power electronics converters, large part of the domestic appliances such as computers, LED lightings, televisions, and sensors can be used as direct DC applications. Furthermore, refrigerators, machine drives, and induction cooking systems need variable frequency and are connected to AC through an inverter. For a microgrid serving both AC and DC devices such as a hybrid microgrid, the multiple ports are highly advantageous. Compared to a conventional hybrid microgrid, which needs multiple conversion stages to integrate to the grid, SST acts as a central hub to interconnect both AC and DC devices.

    Figure 1.  Block diagram of a three-stage SST.

    The LFT being a passive interface between high voltage and low voltage system, power quality disturbances such as voltage sag/swell and harmonics at one side of the transformer will easily affect the other. An SST interfaced microgrid is expected to improve the power quality of the system by mitigating those issues [15,16,17].

    The first stage of the SST, i.e., the rectifier stage is responsible for regulating the voltage of the medium voltage DC (MVDC) link. This ensures the input of the DC-DC stage is constant. Additionally, the rectifier control system ensures the input AC is in phase with the voltage, allowing a unity power factor. The rectifier control is also responsible for mitigating the harmonics flowing to the upstream of the network by ensuring that the input currents have a sinusoidal shape. However, the harmonic content level is governed by the bandwidth of the PWM controller, which in turn is depended on the SST switching frequency [10]. The SST incorporated at higher voltage levels in the case for replacement of a distribution transformer can be designed with multilevel modular cascaded topologies. The multilevel rectifier at the front end reduces the harmonic injection to the system further [20]. Although the quantitative analysis shows that the on-load tap changers (OLTC) equipped for LFT can perform similar functionality in voltage regulation, a number of tap movements should be incorporated to follow variations in the voltage accurately.

    The HFT is the main component of the DC-DC converter, which provides the voltage transformation through medium frequency (power frequency) to high frequency isolation between the main grid and the microgrid [24,25]. Hence, anomalies and the faults encountered in any side are isolated from propagating into the other side. The High Frequency (HF) isolation of the SST results in a less weight and volume when compared to the traditional power transformers [26]. Low weight and volume of the SST make it a good option for applications where weight and space are limited. Nonetheless, the increased frequencies affect the winding and core losses and ultimately in the cooling system. Therefore, the optimizing of the frequency and the size of the transformer based on core and winding material is a major concern in the practical implementation of the SST [26]. The selection of the magnetic materials for the construction of the core and the windings of the HFT are important design considerations [26]. The leakage inductance of the HFT acts as the energy buffer for the power flow of the SST. The power flow control of the SST depends on the high frequency magnetic link and is discussed in section 4.1.

    The rectifier control compensates the reactive power injected to or absorbed from the grid. The reactive power control of the SST is hence governed by the rectifier. The DC link in MVDC side of the DC-DC converter affects the input voltage ride through and mitigate the voltage swell or sags from the grid; i.e. when a sag occurs, the MVDC link capacitor injects the accumulated energy and when the swell occurs, it absorbs the excess energy, so that the load voltages are not affected. Since the rectifier stage supplies a constant voltage at the MVDC link, the controller of the DAB acts in maintaining a regulated DC output voltage at LVDC by allowing the required power flow facilitated by the leakage inductance of the HFT.

    The SST can be employed to interrupt fault current in the event of a fault on either side of the SST. In the event of a fault, the power electronic switches are turned off and the current flow will be interrupted. The short circuit fault currents in the downstream network of the microgrid strongly depend on the SST controllers. Hence, the fault currents can be reduced and eliminated in a very short time by protection function in the SST [20]. Two basic operating modes of the microgrid are SST enabled mode and the islanding mode. If the DESD connected to the SST based microgrid has sufficient capacity, the microgrid can operate in islanding mode. The islanding mode is enabled by switching off the SST, allowing the microgrid to operate independently from the SST. The DESD of the microgrid starts regulating the DC bus voltage in this mode. The features discussed above can be achieved by designing the SST with proper architecture [27] and a control scheme [28]. In addition, communication enabled SST enhances the operational benefits of the microgrid [10].

    The requirements of an envisioned microgrid system for the future distribution network are fulfilled by SSTs. At the same time, it is worthwhile to mention the design and control objectives that the SST should fulfill to enable the interfacing with a microgrid. The major design and control objectives are (ⅰ) bus voltage regulation (ⅱ) power flow control (ⅲ) battery SoC management (ⅳ) power quality improvement (ⅴ) power factor improvement. In addition, energy management and fault isolation are also expected as improved control capabilities.

    Addressing stringent requirements of the microgrids in terms of power and energy management, improved controllability and enhanced coordination is quite challenging. Especially the microgrid architecture and power electronic converters adopted have a significant influence in this regard. For example, as reported in [29] and [30], the DC line losses in two different AC/DC hybrid microgrid topologies are 24% and 56%. The variation is due to the placement and type of power electronic converters used in the two topologies. However, a quantitative/qualitative analysis of the 'SST based microgrids' for these challenges has not yet been done. Table 2 presents the summary of the identified set of challenges and proposed solutions in interfacing SSTs into microgrids.

    Table 2.  Challenges in interfacing SST in microgrids.
    Focus Area Challenge Issue Proposed Solutions
    Design Efficiency Converter Loss Selection of the optimum switching frequency
    Proper Material usage (Ex: SiC) [11]
    Heat Transfer Special designs for thermal and insulation aspect [30,31]
    Volume/weight Thermal and insulation issues Natural convention if possible [31]
    Fan-cooled and water-cooled heat-sinks [32]
    High voltage, high Power devices Switching ratings of power devices have to withstand the distribution level voltages (2.3 kV-35 kV) [10,22] Modular structures or multilevel converters [8,33,8]
    Wideband gap power devices- (4H-SiC) [11]
    High frequency Transformer Core structure and material Nano-crystalline core [10,11,26]
    Winding configuration Core type solenoidal structure [11]
    Noise at high frequency ZVS PWM controlling circuit [34]
    High voltage insulation conductors Litz wire is employed in prototypes [35,36]
    Control and operation Control of the SST Islanding mode for the isolation of the microgrid and the transfer from islanding to grid connected mode Presence of the DC-DC isolated stage enables the islanding mode by SST design
    Different modes of operation for the seamless transfer between grid connected and islanding modes [14]
    The complexity of the controller Hierarchical power management [14]
    Control strategies for modular structures [37,38]
    Zonal microgrid concept with SST [15]
    A separate communication line for the SST coordination [3]
    Cost Material costs In comparison of TCO (total cost of ownership) LFT is preferred over SST [39]
    Costs incurred to improve efficiency, operating and procurement costs [12] Comprehensive cost analysis of the SST microgrids has not been done yet [17]
    Short lifetime of power electronic converters [11]
    Protection Over current Conventional overcurrent protection coordination incompatible with the SST [4] Intelligent fault detection and management [11]
    External protection schemes such as solid-state circuit breakers [40]
    over voltage Protection of sensitive power electronic systems [12,40] LV protection; similar to the solar PV inverter
    MV protection; Earthed SST high common mode stress [40]
    Active protection concepts for both AC/DC SST based microgrid should be investigated further
    Competing approaches Cost effective approaches for LFT Tap changing transformers, Distribution voltage regulators, reactive power compensators are cost effective [4] Major selling points of SST
    Fast response of SST
    Full range controllability
    Hybrid Transformers Highly efficient (>99%) and robust LFT with a power electronic converter for voltage control, reactive power control [4]

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The three ports of the SST can be utilized to form different topologies, and are used appropriately depending on the application interface. The SST can be used both at the LV interface or at the MV interface. Applications of SST in LV interface are the integration of DRER and DESD at LV residential systems [17,20]. Applications of integrating SST with MV involve replacement of distribution transformers such as interfacing microgrids, at substations and in traction systems. At MV ratings and high power applications insulated gate bipolar transistors (IGBT) and HFT are not readily available. In order to solve this problem, a modular and multilevel topologies of MV power converter technologies are employed [41,42]. The MV converter technologies can be used in formulating various topologies of the SST.

    SST based microgrids being the focus of this review different SST architectures which are possible for the implementation of single and multiple microgrids are presented in this section.

    There are three basic SST topologies: (ⅰ) Single stage without a DC link (ⅱ) Two stage with either LVDC or MVDC link and (ⅲ) Three stage with both MVDC and LVDC links [5,17].

    Single stage SST is the low-cost SST option, with direct AC-AC conversion. Fewer conversion stages imply its increased. efficiency and improved reliability. It is mostly suited for size critical applications. Four quadrant power devices are needed for the bi-directional operation of the converter [17]. Similar to an LFT, the disturbances on primary are replicated on the secondary side.

    In two-stage SST, there is a DC isolation stage, either in the LV side or MV side. For high voltage applications, two-stage SST is not suitable, since zero-voltage switching (ZVS) has to be guaranteed due to the wide input range [17]. This topology has a straightforward application in the integration of renewable energy resources [5]. Three-stage SST is the most commonly used and preferred topology in the field because of its high flexibility and controllability.

    It has sufficient options to optimize the performance in terms of efficiency and weight/volume. It allows separate control of voltage and current at each stage [11,14,17,42,43,44]. Many attractive features such as reactive power compensation, voltage sag compensation, bidirectional power flow, and DER and DESD integration can be achieved using this topology [4]. A well-known example for three-stage SST is the UNIFLEX SST proposed for smart grid applications [10].

    For medium voltage and high power applications, the SST cells should be connected in series or parallel, in a modular structure due to the existing limitations in power electronic devices and magnetic materials [45]. In the microgrid application or any distribution system application, SST has to step down the voltage. Therefore, the high-voltage (HV) inputs of the SST modules are connected in series, and the LV outputs are connected in parallel as in the input series output parallel configuration [46]. However, these topologies use increased number of switches, resulting in increased complexity and power losses [20]. For the AC-DC rectifier stage, half-bridge and full-bridge configurations are possible as a topology in one module [47]. Half-bridge module with two transistors can get two output voltage levels, and a full-bridge module can give three possible output voltage levels enabling the AC-DC as a modular multi-level converter (MMC) [47].

    For the DC-DC stage, DAB and the series resonant converter (SRC) can be used. In SRC, the switching frequency operates near to the resonant frequency reducing the losses, hence giving high efficiency. However, inability of SRC to operate in multilevel voltages and to decouple the MV and LV negate the advantages offered by the SRC. Hence, the DAB is preferred [29,47]. Figure 2 depicts a three stage and three phase modular SST topology for microgrids, which is the commonly used MMC topology [6,9,19]. Tri active bridge (TAB), quadruple active bridge (QAB), and penta active bridge (PAB) are known as multiple active bridges (MAB) sharing a common high frequency magnetic link [29,47,48,49]. All these topologies are capable of providing bi-directional power flow, a required condition for the interconnection of a microgrid [42,29]. Having MAB with a shared HF magnetic link improve the cross-coupling power transfer capability, better harmonics performance, and a low current stress on the LV inverter [49].

    Figure 2.  Commonly used three phase, three stage modular SST based microgrid topology [9,25].

    In considering grid applications of SST, a quantitative analysis is carried in [8] to select the most appropriate DC-DC converter for the SST based on its efficiency. In [8], possible DC-DC converter types including the DAB, SRC, and QAB are compared. The QAB having the highest efficiency and reliability with the low cost is selected as the best qualifier for the DC-DC stage of the SST though its controllability is low [8,48]. In applying SSTs in microgrids, MMC can be used either in the MVAC-LVDC conversion, at the DC-DC stage or at both conversions. However, it is not necessary to use a MMC at the inverter stage since it deals with lower voltages. Nevertheless, in some applications, MMCs are used at all three stages of the SST such as at the 300 kVA UNIFLEX SST [10].

    A 20 kVA SST is proposed in [50] and the MMC is used at the front-end rectifier and at the DAB. Also, the MMC has been adopted for both rectifier and the DC-DC conversion stage for a three phase SST in [6,9,14,19]. Depending on the voltage interface of the SST and the power handling requirement, a desirable topology can be selected. In [42], six types of selected modular SST configurations based on its implementation are discussed. The configurations considered in [42], being bi-directional, they satisfy the minimum requirement to replace an LFT in an active distribution system. The advantages and disadvantages of each configuration are summarized in Table 3.

    Table 3.  Advantages and disadvantages of selected SST configurations.
    Topology Configuration Advantages Disadvantages Applicability in microgrids
    Modular single stage AC-AC full-bridge converter Simple control Absence of power factor correction [5,42] Expected advantages of a SST cannot be achieved if the single stage SST is used in a microgrid
    Increased size filter affects input power factor
    AC-AC fly back converter Least no of switches per module [50] Voltage stress on the switches doubles [42]
    Large sized filters [51]
    Modular two stage AC-DC isolated boost converter + PWM inverter Seamless control of power in both directions Two different controls Complexity of the bi-directional control makes it an inappropriate application for microgrid
    Less robust voltage regulation [42]
    AC-DC DAB + PWM inverter Seamless control of power in both directions High sensitivity of the average active power flow to large ripple currents Two-stage with LVDC link is preferred since the SST should interface at the LV side in the grid for DC and hybrid microgrids
    ZVC for a wide load range [52] Poor regulation of the LVDC link
    Modular three stage PWM Rectifier + DC-DC DAB + PWM inverter Superior controllability [42] Large no. of components reduces the efficiency and reliability [42] Most widely used microgrid prototype - DC microgrids [15], hybrid microgrids [44,51] including FREEDM researchers [3]
    Multilevel Rectifier+ DC-DC Full-Bridge Converter + PWM inverter Bi-directional power flow Large no of clamping diodes
    Injects low ripple currents into the LVDC link [42] Large sized full-bridge inverter
    Impedance mismatching

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The SST based microgrid architectures can be basically divided into two types: microgrids with single SST and, microgrids with multiple SSTs. Based on the existing and possible SST microgrid configurations the architectures are classified as shown in Figure 3. In Figure 4 this classification is further illustrated. All configurations presented in Figure 4, assume a three stage SST topology and the DC/DC converters are not indicated wherever necessary. The microgrids with single SST, known as the 'grid SST' are usually coupled to the grid. Single SSTs are of two types: LVDC and LVAC connected type, and the disconnected type. The most common and the general architecture is the SST LVDC and LVAC disconnected type and, it has several variations depending on the number of microgrids connected, i.e. Type (ⅰ)—Single microgrid with DESD, DRER and loads (Figure 4a) and Type (ⅱ)—Zonal microgrids (Figure 4b).

    Figure 3.  Classification of SST based microgrid architecture.
    Figure 4.  (a) Type ⅰ—Single SST, Single microgrid (b-ⅰ) Type ⅱ SST Zonal microgrids (b-ⅱ) Zonal DC microgrid (c) Type ⅲ- Single SST interconnected LVAC and LVDC microgrid (d) Type ⅳ- Multiple SST single microgrid with grid SST (e) Type ⅴ- Multiple SST zonal microgrids without grid SST.

    Type (ⅰ) has the simplest architecture and control scheme. It has the possibility of integrating an AC, DC or hybrid microgrid. Multiple reverse conversions in an individual AC, DC microgrid are reduced [17]. The Type (ⅱ) is a novel concept presented in [15,53,54] for zonal microgrids and can be implemented in a DC microgrid or DC/AC hybrid microgrid; hence it should be supported with additional power management capability. Due to the interconnection of ports, it has drawbacks of having the requirement of complex communication and control between microgrids [15].

    The Type (ⅲ)—SST LVDC and LVAC interconnected concept is presented in [55] and is illustrated in Figure 4c. This architecture offers the advantages of reduction in LV converter size, distribution losses, and converter losses. Due to the interconnection of the DC and AC bus, the voltage regulation is improved in the system. The existing microgrid architectures having multiple SSTs can be divided into two forms: as with and without grid SST. The SSTs can be directly interfaced to DRER or DESD [20,56].

    Type (ⅳ) is a multiple SST architecture with a grid connected SST that can be integrated with source and storage SSTs as well as with the AC microgrid as presented in Figure 4d. With this architecture, a decentralized control can be employed. In [21], same architecture is used without the grid SST, where the SST has interfaced a wind generation. It is shown that the DG hosting capacity has improved to 60% with the use of SST. The control being a challenge, there are many research focusing interfacing the large-scale wind generation with SST [21]. With Type (ⅳ) architecture, large DGs can be interfaced to the distribution network. In this scenario, since the SST has to operate in much lower voltages, the option of MMC can be omitted.

    The Type (ⅴ) microgrid without grid SST has an SST at each separate zone and is shown in Figure 4e [3]. This architecture is proposed by the Future Renewable Electric Energy Delivery and Management system (FREEDM) researchers. The control is complex and hence, hierarchical strategy is proposed [17,55,57]. This architecture is useful only for large regional networks.

    All the above architecture types can be categorized in terms of energy storage as well, i.e. with a common DESD or each zone/SST having a separate DESD. For example, as denoted in Figure 4b-i, the Type (ⅱ) mentioned above can have a central DESD with multiple Zonal microgrids and each Zonal microgrid can have a separate DESD.

    In [35], a novel resilient SST based microgrid design having two separate LVDC and MVDC microgrids is proposed. In this system, storage is connected to the LVDC but, with a potential to be connected at the MVDC whenever required. This design is not included in the categorization. Using centralized storage is a cost-effective option to trade off the high cost of zonal microgrids. The stability issues of the multiple SSTs connected to the grid, especially to a weak grid, needs to be further researched and corresponding damping techniques need to be investigated [24].

    The performance of SST based microgrid mainly depends on the control algorithms of the SST(s). For the reliable operation of a microgrid, power control scheme should be capable of operating under different modes and conditions of operation.

    The three stage SST, topology by design allows the bi-directional power flow, the major requirement of a microgrid. The front end rectifier (see Figure 1) is responsible for regulating the voltage of the MV DC link, shaping the input current; thus achieves the reactive power compensation and harmonic elimination [13]. In the second stage of the three stage SST; the DC-DC converter controls the power flow across the SST and regulates the LVDC bus voltage. The most commonly used architecture for the DC-DC converter is the DAB, which is controlled using phase shift modulation (PSM) also known as single phase shift modulation (SPSM) [25,49]. It uses the phase angle of the primary and the secondary of the HFT to control the direction and the magnitude of the power flow. The amount of power flow from one bridge to the other bridge is controlled by adjusting the phase shift between the primary and the secondary voltage waveforms of the HFT. The power flow of the DAB is given by (1) where Vin, Vout are the input, output voltages of the DAB, Ɵ is phase angle displacement of the input voltage and output voltage of HFT(with a unity turns ratio), f is the switching frequency and L is the leakage inductance of the HFT. Ɵ is controlled to generate the switching signal using PSM. When Ɵ is zero, there is no power flow in the converter. When Ɵ > 0, power flow direction is towards the microgrid from the grid and when Ɵ < 0 the power flow towards the grid from the microgrid [25]. DAB power flow is illustrated in Figure 5.

    $ {\mathit{\boldsymbol{P}}_{\mathit{\boldsymbol{out}}}} = \frac{{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{V}}_{\mathit{\boldsymbol{in}}}}{\mathit{\boldsymbol{V}}_{\mathit{\boldsymbol{out}}}}{\rm{ \mathsf{ θ} }}}}{{{\bf{2}}\mathit{\boldsymbol{\pi fL}}}}\left( {{\bf{1}} - \frac{{\rm{ \mathsf{ θ} }}}{\mathit{\boldsymbol{\pi }}}} \right) $ (1)

    However, the SPSM can only manage the average output power, because it has only one degree of freedom. The Equation 1 can be rewritten with the duty ratio D, as expressed in Eq 2 [49].

    $ {\mathit{\boldsymbol{P}}_{\mathit{\boldsymbol{out}}}} = \frac{{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{V}}_{\mathit{\boldsymbol{in}}}}{\mathit{\boldsymbol{V}}_{\mathit{\boldsymbol{out}}}}}}{{{\bf{4}}\mathit{\boldsymbol{fL}}}}\mathit{\boldsymbol{D}}({\bf{1}} - \mathit{\boldsymbol{D}}) $ (2)

    Another modulation scheme applied for DAB and other MAB topologies is the dual-phase-shift modulation (DPSM) with two degrees of freedom [49]. In addition to the phase shift between the primary and secondary side, it controls the phase-shift between half-bridges in the identical sides [49]. This is represented in Eq 3 where D1 and D2 denote the inner phase shift and the outer phase shift ratio of the DAB [49].

    $ {\mathit{\boldsymbol{P}}_{\mathit{\boldsymbol{out}}}} = \left\{ {VinVout4fL[D2(1D2)12D21];0<D1<D2<1VinVout4fL[D2(1D1)12D22];0<D2<D1<1
    } \right. $
    (3)
    Figure 5.  Phase shift control of the HFT.

    For other MAB topologies, the transferred power from the SPSM and DPSM is presented in [49]. The control loop of the DC-DC converter guarantees the LVDC bus voltage regulation and permits the variation of the power flow. The voltage source inverter regulates the LVAC bus voltage required for the AC microgrid. The controllers for each stage of the SST are discussed under decentralized control.

    The control environment of a microgrid is both time-varying and complicated. For example, the intermittent nature of the DRER always varies with the power output to the microgrid. Not only DRER but loads and the DESD are also time-varying components. Reference [14] presents the main control objective of such a microgrid system. To maintain the power balance, the power consumed by loads of AC and DC microgrids, PLOAD should be equal to the sum of the power supplied by the SST, PSST, power supplied by the sources of the DC microgrid, PDC_MG and the AC microgrid, PAC_MG. This is represented in Eq 4.

    $ {\mathit{\boldsymbol{P}}_{\mathit{\boldsymbol{SST}}}} + {\mathit{\boldsymbol{P}}_{\mathit{\boldsymbol{D}}{\mathit{\boldsymbol{C}}_\mathit{\boldsymbol{ - }}}\mathit{\boldsymbol{MG}}}} + {\mathit{\boldsymbol{P}}_{\mathit{\boldsymbol{A}}{\mathit{\boldsymbol{C}}_\mathit{\boldsymbol{ - }}}\mathit{\boldsymbol{MG}}}} = {\mathit{\boldsymbol{P}}_{\mathit{\boldsymbol{LOAD}}}} $ (4)

    The SST based microgrid control techniques discussed in literature are identified under three categories: centralized control, decentralized control and hierarchical control [54,58,59,60]. Centralized and decentralized schemes have been the common control solution to cater the control requirements of microgrids. However, when considering the challenging control requirements imposed on microgrids, such as operating the microgrid in the islanding mode, optimum battery management and the seamless transfer between the two operational modes, more advanced controlling must be employed. The hierarchical control for SST microgrids was introduced in [44] to address these challenges. The discussion under this section is focused on the system level controls, rather than considering the microgrid device level controls; such as battery control, solar PV control and load control. The below analysis of the control structures is discussed focusing on single microgrid.

    In centralized control, the SST becomes the central controller, where the microgrid is linked to it with a communication link. This has the drawback of relying on the communication that degrades the system reliability. Due to the limited capabilities, central control techniques are rarely applied in SST based microgrids. Depending on the control objective, the SST employs either current controlling or voltage controlling.

    In [10], a predictive current controlling technique for power management is presented for the UNIFLEX system and is shown in Figure 6. Depending on the power requirement of the microgrid measured using remote measurement units, the active power reference, P*, and reactive power reference, Q* are calculated. The controller technique introduced in [10] uses a multi-loop system where both DC bus voltage, Vdc and the power flow are controlled at the same time. The overall control system constitutes a phase locked loop (PLL), reference generators, predictive subsystem, and PWM generator. The current of MVAC side, Ihabc is compared against the reference current, Ihabc* to calculate the switching signal, Sw. In [61], a voltage control algorithm based on fuzzy logic is proposed for the control of the DC-DC DAB driving a constant power load. The proposed fuzzy logic controller (FLC) scheme operates the voltage loop in the fuzzy operation, improving the robustness and dynamic performance of the voltage loop of the DAB. The voltage regulation at load transients is quantified in this study. In [62], a PI control scheme based on two fuzzy networks is designed for a three stage SST. Implementation of fuzzy controllers to fulfill other stringent control requirements is a possible area for future studies. In decentralized control, a local controller exists for each stage/component of the microgrid and the control measurements are taken locally. Decentralized control scheme for SST microgrid provides more simple and robust control capability [10,38,61]. In decentralized control, the converter controllers in the three stages are not linked to each other; hence, it increases the system reliability.

    Figure 6.  Block diagram of a centralized controlling technique based on the predictive current controller for SST based microgrid [10].

    A general control block diagram for the decentralized SST based microgrid control is shown in Figure 7. The PWM signal Sw1 in the rectifier stage is generated by taking the input parameters of the MVAC side of the SST Vhabc and Ihabc. Similarly, the Sw3 switching signal in the inverter is generated by taking the output parameters of the SST Vlabc and Ilabc. Decoupled dq control is used in this generalized control diagram for the rectifier and the inverter stage. The dq axis currents at MVAC and LVAC side of the SST are Ihd/Ihq and Ild/Ilq respectively. The reference d axis currents (Ihd* and Ild*) are calculated by the respective DC bus voltage controller whereas the reference q axis currents (Ihq*/Ilq*) are calculated considering the required power factor (common practice is to set Ihq* = 0 and Ilq* = 0 so that rectifier and the inverter operates at unity power factor). The Sw2 switching signal is generated according to the PSM.

    In [38], a DPSM is employed to manage the power flow, and to balance the module level voltage to prevent the voltage unbalance occurring due to modular multilevel structure. Similarly, in [58], voltage unbalance issue at the capacitor is addressed using a central control scheme based on PI controllers.

    Figure 7.  Decentralized controller which depicts the 3 local controllers at each conversion stage.

    Hierarchical control embodies the advantages of both centralized and distributed control; hence, more advanced control objectives can be met [3,44]. Hierarchical control is derived from the ANSI/ISA–95 [54] and operates based on different time scales depending on the control requirement. It has three layers: primary, secondary and tertiary. Centralized and hierarchical power management control strategies for SST based DC microgrid are presented in [44,60]. More complicated hierarchical and distributed control architecture is deployed in FREEDM System Center [3]. Better coordination between different operating levels can be seen in the hierarchical control, and thus makes it highly applicable for the SST based microgrids. In [3], modular multilevel rectifier with DAB with smart microgrid adopts a hierarchical microgrid control. A summary of the control strategies for SST based microgrids is provided in Table 4.

    Table 4.  Control strategies adopted in SST based microgrids.
    Type System Architecture Control Objectives of the SST Controllers/Technique adopted
    Centralized control Three stage, three phase back to back multilevel UNIFLEX System [10] Universal and flexible Power Management Predictive, deadbeat type current control technique
    Three phase modular multilevel DC/DC converter [38] Regulate the DC output voltage PWM, ZVS, dual-phase-shift method
    DAB with an islanded DC microgrid [61] Bidirectional power flow
    Voltage regulation at the DAB at both steady state and at dynamic state Fuzzy logic controller
    Decentralized control Three stage, single phase SST with DC microgrid [25] AC-DC: MVDC Bus voltage regulation PWM with dq controller for voltage and current
    Three stage, three phase modular topology [62] Bi-directional power flow and maintain unity power factor at the MVAC side
    Three stage, single phase SST with zonal DC microgrid [7] DC-DC: LVDC Bus voltage regulation PSM
    Average model of a single phase SST based on FREEDM system [63] DC-AC: LVAC Output voltage regulation Sinusoidal PWM with dq control
    SST with cascaded multilevel rectifier and DC microgrid [24] DC Link capacitor voltage Balancing for the rectifier PI controllers for voltage balance in each H bridge
    Minimize the coupling effect of the system control and voltage balance control
    Hierarchical control Cascaded multilevel rectifier with three H-bridges [44] Primary control: DC Bus voltage regulation by the battery at islanding mode Droop control
    Modular multilevel rectifier+ DAB with smart microgrid [3] Secondary control: Maintain DC Bus voltage of the microgrid PI controller for voltage compensation
    Tertiary control: Battery operation in the SoC range, Power, fault and energy Management of the microgrid Upper level control structure which sets ref parameters to primary control

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The SST based microgrid is a complex system where multiple number of converters are associated. When SST acts as the interface to the main grid, the voltage and power balance of the microgrid system under predicted conditions, is achieved by the SST by its design [35]. However, co-ordination between microgrid converters can achieve more controllability, optimize the system performance, improve power quality and improve network stability [64]. Communication links from the SST to each device of the system are proposed in the envisioned SST microgrid systems in [3,57]. In the presence of a single SST, the SST acts as the main controller, which manages the power flow and voltage control. But, the system becomes complex in the presence of multiple SSTs and microgrids [64] where a coordinated control is mostly preferred. Even for systems with MMC based SSTs [65] or systems which have unpredicted loads and generations [66], coordinated control schemes are suggested. However, SST based microgrid coordinated control is still a possible research area to focus.

    Although the research focusing on power management of the SST is popular, SST control algorithm incorporating energy economics is an open topic for research. For example, if the time dependent price of electricity at a particular moment is expensive, power flow to the DSED shall be reduced and vice versa [9]. A controlling mechanism, considering the safe operation of the SST in the grid, still preserving its functionalities is a future focus of SST technology [8].

    This section presents, SST based microgrid test systems developed worldwide.

    The FREEDM system is an envisioned smart grid proposed with the basis of novel technologies like SST. The FREEDM system is used as a test-bed in many research discussing control and design techniques for SSTs [3,43,44,55,57,60,]. The system architecture employed in the FREEDM system is of Type (ⅴ) introduced in section III. The system consists of multiple SSTs enabled with a fault indication device (FID) and communication [3]. In [3], advanced cascaded control based on 4 control levels; (ⅰ) user level, (ⅱ) SST level, (ⅲ) FREEDM system level and (ⅳ) multiple FREEDM system level is presented. The control objectives at levels 1–3 are (ⅰ) demand management, (ⅱ) DC bus voltage regulation, power management, and power quality maintenance and (ⅲ) fault management and energy management, respectively. Level 4 control coordinates multiple FREEDM systems that form a large regional grid. A hierarchical power management strategy for the FREEDM system is presented in [44,64]. Here, the battery SoC level is managed in the tertiary control for battery management [44]. Hierarchical control strategy used in [44] presents a time dependent intelligent fault management (IFM), intelligent power management (IPM) and intelligent energy management (IEM). In [24], a 3.6 kV–120 V/10 kVA SST prototype is developed and tested with a hierarchical control strategy, which was integrated with the FREEDM center.

    The LEMUR Project has a 150 kW SST with a DC link (750 VDC) where a DC microgrid is connected, and two AC links (375 VAC, 750 VAC) where multiple nano microgrids are connected. The DC microgrid is connected to the interconnected LVAC and LVDC. The proposed system architecture is of Type (ⅲ) introduced in section Ⅲ. The LEMUR project has recorded an efficiency of 97.17% including the IGBT losses at 100% loading level. It adopts a TAB with centralized controller for current and voltage regulation.

    The HEART project undertakes a modular approach for the 'smart transformer' [8]. In order to approach the challenges of reliability and efficiency, the HEART researchers have used a modular approach. A scaled down three phase SST prototype of 100 kW, 1.5 kV 800 VAC, 800 VDC with a QAB converter is built. It has three cells of cascaded half-bridge at each phase [67]. The main control objectives of the controller are to control the local loads and sources while controlling the voltage of the MV and LV network. In [68], the HEART researchers proposed a soft load reduction method based on the SST similar to the load shedding to compensate the grid instability due to high loading. The developed SST in HEART project was also employed for the replacement of an LFT in a distribution feeder and recorded a 60% improvement of DG hosting capacity in wind generation [69].

    Solid State Transformers (SSTs) are most likely to play a key role in the future smart grid. It has been identified that microgrids are a defined market for the SSTs. This paper has presented a comprehensive review and comparison on integration, design and control aspects related to the SST microgrids. Six possible architectures to integrate the SST with microgrids are reviewed and the advantages and disadvantages of each design is presented. SST by design adds voltage and power flow controllability to the microgrid. More advanced control schemes based on device communication can optimize the power flow and energy management and of the network. SST microgrids Experimental setups worldwide are presented with their respective design and control architectures.

    The SST by its design, offers multiple advantages to both the utility and the consumer. However, multiple SSTs connected to the grid can cause stability issues, especially in the weak grids, and should be investigated further. In terms of the SST based microgrid control, design of coordinated control scheme between conversion stages for the decentralized control is a possible area for future study. Energy economics, safety and protection considerations, and fault identification of SST based microgrids are other open topics for research. Despite the benefits offered by the SST based microgrids, in terms of the efficiency and the cost, LFT technology still imposes a competing challenge for the SST. With the improvement of Nanocrystalline core and SiC power devices, SST efficiency will continue to improve, enabling more efficient integration. Quantifying the economic benefits of the SST based microgrids, might tradeoff the cost associated with it. More research must be undertaken with regard to the costing and return on investment of the SST microgrids.

    However, with the stringent requirements of the future power system, where DC loads and sources will become plug and play devices on the residential environments will notify the boost of SST based microgrids. Thus, the design and control of the SST microgrids will continue to evolve as a collaborative challenge for the power electronics and power systems engineers.

    Authors would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by the University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka under the research grant SRC/ST/2019/39.

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    [1] Moloney S, Horne RE, Fien J (2010) Transitioning to low carbon communities—from behaviour change to systemic change: Lessons from Australia. Energy policy 38: 7614-7623. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.058
    [2] Heiskanen E, Johnson M, Robinson S, et al. (2010) Low-Carbon Communities as a Context for Individual Behavioural Change. Energy Policy 38: 7586-7595. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.002
    [3] Abrahamse W, Steg L, Vlek C, et al. (2005) A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. J Environ Psych 25: 273-291. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002
    [4] Steg L (2008) Promoting household energy conservation. Energy policy 36: 4449-4453. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.027
    [5] Hazas M, Friday A, Scott J (2011) Look back before leaping forward: four decades of domestic energy inquiry. IEEE Pervasive Computing 10: 13-19. doi: 10.1109/MPRV.2010.89
    [6] Stern PC (1999) Information, incentives, and proenvironmental consumer behavior. J Consumer Policy 22: 461-478. doi: 10.1023/A:1006211709570
    [7] Dietz T, Stern PC (2002) New Tools for Environmental Protection: Education, Information, and Voluntary Measures. Washington: National Academies Press.
    [8] Stern PC (2008) Environmentally significant behavior in the home. In: Lewis A, editor. Stern PC (2008) in The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behaviour. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ Press, 363-382.
    [9] Stern PC (2011) Contributions of psychology to limiting climate change. American Psychologist 66: 303-314. doi: 10.1037/a0023235
    [10] Gardner GT, Stern PC (2002) Environmental Problems and Human Behavior. Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing.
    [11] Wilhite H, Shove E, Lutzenhiser L, et al. (2000) The legacy of twenty years of energy demand management: we know more about individual behaviour but next to nothing about demand. Society, behaviour, and climate change mitigation: Springer, 109-126.
    [12] Biggart NW, Lutzenhiser L (2007) Economic sociology and the social problem of energy inefficiency. American Behavioral Scientist 50: 1070-1087. doi: 10.1177/0002764207299355
    [13] Geller H, Attali S (2005) The experience with energy efficiency policies and programmes in IEA countries: Learning from the critics. Paris: International Energy Agency Information Paper.
    [14] Sorrell S (2007) The economics of energy service contracts. Energy Policy 35: 507-521. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.12.009
    [15] Kurz T (2002) The Psychology of Environmentally Sustainable Behavior: Fitting Together Pieces of the Puzzle. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 2: 257-278. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2002.00041.x
    [16] Abrahamse W, Steg L, Vlek C, et al. (2007) The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents. J Environ Psychology 27: 265-276. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.002
    [17] Parnell R, Larsen OP (2005) Informing the Development of Domestic Energy Efficiency Initiatives: An Everyday Householder-Centered Framework. Environ Behavior 37: 787-807. doi: 10.1177/0013916504274008
    [18] van Vliet B, Chappells H, Shove E (2005) Infrastructures of consumption: environmental innovation in the utility industries. London: Earthscan.
    [19] Snowden D (2002) Complex acts of knowing: paradox and descriptive self-awareness. J Knowledge Manage 6: 100-111.
    [20] Kurtz CF, Snowden DJ (2003) The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex and complicated world. IEEE Engineering Management Review 30; 31: 110-110.
    [21] Lutzenhiser L (1993) Social and behavioral aspects of energy use. Annu Rev Energ Env18: 247-289.
    [22] Keirstead J (2006) Evaluating the applicability of integrated domestic energy consumption frameworks in the UK. Energy policy 34: 3065-3077. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.06.004
    [23] Wilson C, Dowlatabadi H (2007) Models of decision making and residential energy use. Annul Rev Env Resour 32: 169-203.
    [24] Stern PC (2000) Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Social Issue 56: 407-424. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175
    [25] Heiskanen E, Johnson M, Saastamoinen M, et al. How does consumer behaviour change? Examples from energy conservation. In: Koskela M, Vinnari M, editors; 2009; Tampere, Finland. FFRC eBOOK, 287-295.
    [26] Lucas K, Brooks M, Darnton A, et al. (2008) Promoting pro-environmental behaviour: existing evidence and policy implications. Environ Sci Policy 11: 456-466. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.03.001
    [27] Midden CJH, Kaiser FG, Teddy McCalley L (2007) Technology’s Four Roles in Understanding Individuals’ Conservation of Natural Resources. J Social Issue 63: 155-174. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00501.x
    [28] McCalley LT, de Vries PW, Midden CJH (2011) Consumer Response to Product-Integrated Energy Feedback: Behavior, Goal Level Shifts, and Energy Conservation. Environ Behavior 43: 525. doi: 10.1177/0013916510371053
    [29] Dietz T, Gardner GT, Gilligan J, et al. (2009) Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106: 18452-18456.
    [30] Gardner GT, Stern PC (2008) The Short List: The Most Effective Actions U.S. Households Can Take to Curb Climate Change. Environ Sci Policy for Sustain Dev 50: 12-25.
    [31] Sundramoorthy V, Cooper G, Linge N, et al. (2011) Domesticating Energy-Monitoring Systems: Challenges and Design Concerns. IEEE Pervasive Computing 10: 20-27. doi: 10.1109/MPRV.2010.73
    [32] Stephenson J, Barton B, Carrington G, et al. (2010) Energy cultures: a framework for understanding energy behaviours. Energy policy 38: 6120-6129. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.069
    [33] Yin RK (2012) Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE.
    [34] Holstein JA, Gubrium JF (1995) The active interview. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
    [35] Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications.
    [36] Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L (2006) How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods 18: 59-82.
    [37] Aronson J (1994) A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The qualitative report 2: 1-3.
    [38] Attari SZ, DeKay ML, Davidson CI, et al. (2010) Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 16054-16059.
    [39] Dietz T (2010) Narrowing the US energy efficiency gap. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 16007-16008. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010651107
    [40] Fischer C (2008) Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency 1: 79-104. doi: 10.1007/s12053-008-9009-7
    [41] Darby S (2003) Making sense of energy advice. in eceee 2003 Summer Study: Time to turn down energy demand. Saint-Raphaël, France: European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy.
    [42] Vine D, Buys L, Morris P (2013) The effectiveness of energy feedback for conservation and peak demand : a literature review. Open J Energy Efficiency 2: 7-15. doi: 10.4236/ojee.2013.21002
    [43] Gillingham K, Newell RG, Palmer K (2009) Energy Efficiency Economics and Policy, Annual Review of Resource Economics. Annu Rev 1: 597-620.
    [44] McMakin AH, Malone EL, Lundgren RE (2002) Motivating Residents to Conserve Energy without Financial Incentives. Environ Behavior 34: 848-863. doi: 10.1177/001391602237252
    [45] Darby S (2010) Smart metering: what potential for householder engagement? Build Res Inf 38: 442-457. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2010.492660
    [46] Darby S (2006) The effectiveness of feedback on energy consumption: A review for DEFRA of the literature on metering, billing and direct displays. Oxford: Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford.
    [47] Ehrhardt-Martinez K, Laitner JAS, Donnelly KA (2011) Chapter 10—Beyond the Meter: Enabling Better Home Energy Management. In: Fereidoon Perry S, editor. Energy, Sustainability and the Environment. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 273-303.
    [48] Young D (2008) Who pays for the ‘beer fridge’? Evidence from Canada. Energy Policy 36: 553-560.
    [49] Gonzales MH, Aronson E, Costanzo MA (1988) Using Social Cognition and Persuasion to Promote Energy Conservation: A Quasi-Experiment. J Appl Social Psychol 18: 1049-1066. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01192.x
    [50] Gyamfi S, Krumdieck S (2011) Price, Environment and Security: Exploring Multi-modal Motivation in Voluntary Residential Peak Demand Response. Energy Policy 39: 2993-3004. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.012
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Alina Weise, Roland Büchter, Dawid Pieper, Tim Mathes, Assessing context suitability (generalizability, external validity, applicability or transferability) of findings in evidence syntheses in healthcare—An integrative review of methodological guidance, 2020, 11, 1759-2879, 760, 10.1002/jrsm.1453
    2. Niki M. Medendorp, Pomme E.A. van Maarschalkerweerd, Laxsini Murugesu, Joost G. Daams, Ellen M.A. Smets, Marij A. Hillen, The impact of communicating uncertain test results in cancer genetic counseling: A systematic mixed studies review, 2020, 103, 07383991, 1692, 10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.015
    3. Md Mahbub Hossain, Umbrella Review as an Emerging Approach of Evidence Synthesis in Health Sciences: A Bibliometric Analysis, 2020, 1556-5068, 10.2139/ssrn.3551055
    4. Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, Lorraine Hui En Tan, Yun Ting Ong, Kuang Teck Tay, Jia Min Hee, Min Chiam, Elisha Wan Ying Chia, Krish Sheri, Xiu Hui Tan, Yao Hao Teo, Cheryl Shumin Kow, Stephen Mason, Ying Pin Toh, Enhancing Mentoring in Palliative Care: An Evidence Based Mentoring Framework, 2020, 7, 2382-1205, 238212052095764, 10.1177/2382120520957649
    5. Kam-Fung Cheung, Michael G.H. Bell, Jyotirmoyee Bhattacharjya, Cybersecurity in logistics and supply chain management: An overview and future research directions, 2021, 146, 13665545, 102217, 10.1016/j.tre.2020.102217
    6. Lisa Xin Ling Ngiam, Yun Ting Ong, Jun Xuan Ng, Joshua Tze Yin Kuek, Jeng Long Chia, Natalie Pei Xin Chan, Chong Yao Ho, Ahmad Bin Hanifah Marican Abdurrahman, Nur Haidah Ahmad Kamal, Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong, Cheng Han Ng, Xiu Hui Tan, Lorraine Hui En Tan, Annelissa Mien Chew Chin, Stephen Mason, Muhammad Raihan Jumat, Min Chiam, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, Impact of Caring for Terminally Ill Children on Physicians: A Systematic Scoping Review, 2021, 38, 1049-9091, 396, 10.1177/1049909120950301
    7. Amitabh Anand, Louise Brøns Kringelum, Charlotte Øland Madsen, Louisa Selivanovskikh, Interorganizational learning: a bibliometric review and research agenda, 2020, ahead-of-print, 0969-6474, 10.1108/TLO-02-2020-0023
    8. Kaitlyn Tate, Sarah Hewko, Patrick McLane, Pamela Baxter, Karyn Perry, Susan Armijo-Olivo, Carole Estabrooks, Deb Gordon, Greta Cummings, Learning to lead: a review and synthesis of literature examining health care managers' use of knowledge, 2019, 24, 1355-8196, 57, 10.1177/1355819618786764
    9. Sheryl Reimer-Kirkham, Barbara Astle, Ikponwosa Ero, Kristi Panchuk, Duncan Dixon, Albinism, spiritual and cultural practices, and implications for health, healthcare, and human rights: a scoping review, 2019, 34, 0968-7599, 747, 10.1080/09687599.2019.1566051
    10. Joke Depraetere, Christophe Vandeviver, Tom Vander Beken, Ines Keygnaert, Big Boys Don’t Cry: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of Male Sexual Victimization, 2020, 21, 1524-8380, 991, 10.1177/1524838018816979
    11. Joshua Tze Yin Kuek, Lisa Xin Ling Ngiam, Nur Haidah Ahmad Kamal, Jeng Long Chia, Natalie Pei Xin Chan, Ahmad Bin Hanifah Marican Abdurrahman, Chong Yao Ho, Lorraine Hui En Tan, Jun Leng Goh, Michelle Shi Qing Khoo, Yun Ting Ong, Min Chiam, Annelissa Mien Chew Chin, Stephen Mason, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, The impact of caring for dying patients in intensive care units on a physician’s personhood: a systematic scoping review, 2020, 15, 1747-5341, 10.1186/s13010-020-00096-1
    12. Katrin Gerber, Emma Maharaj, Bianca Brijnath, Josefine Antoniades, End-of-life care for older first-generation migrants: a scoping review, 2020, 2045-435X, bmjspcare-2020-002617, 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002617
    13. Ronald B. Brown, Breakthrough Knowledge Synthesis in the Age of Google, 2020, 5, 2409-9287, 4, 10.3390/philosophies5010004
    14. Kwabena Obeng Asiama, Winrich Voss, Rohan Bennett, Innocent Rubanje, Land consolidation activities in Sub-Saharan Africa towards the agenda 2030: A tale of three countries, 2021, 101, 02648377, 105140, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105140
    15. Chong Yao Ho, Cheryl Shumin Kow, Chin Howe Joshua Chia, Jia Ying Low, Yong Hao Melvin Lai, Sarah-Kei Lauw, Ashley Ern Hui How, Lorraine Hui En Tan, Xin Ling Lisa Ngiam, Natalie Pei Xin Chan, Tze Yin Joshua Kuek, Nur Haidah Ahmad Kamal, Jeng Long Chia, Ahmad Bin Hanifah Marican Abdurrahman, Min Chiam, Yun Ting Ong, Annelissa Mien Chew Chin, Ying Pin Toh, Stephen Mason, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, The impact of death and dying on the personhood of medical students: a systematic scoping review, 2020, 20, 1472-6920, 10.1186/s12909-020-02411-y
    16. Chaka Chaka, Translanguaging, Decoloniality, and the Global South: An Integrative Review Study, 2020, 25, 1812-5441, 6, 10.1080/18125441.2020.1802617
    17. Joke Depraetere, Christophe Vandeviver, Ines Keygnaert, Tom Vander Beken, The critical interpretive synthesis: an assessment of reporting practices, 2020, 1364-5579, 1, 10.1080/13645579.2020.1799637
    18. Elisha Wan Ying Chia, Huixin Huang, Sherill Goh, Marlyn Tracy Peries, Charlotte Cheuk Yiu Lee, Lorraine Hui En Tan, Michelle Shi Qing Khoo, Kuang Teck Tay, Yun Ting Ong, Wei Qiang Lim, Xiu Hui Tan, Yao Hao Teo, Cheryl Shumin Kow, Annelissa Mien Chew Chin, Min Chiam, Jamie Xuelian Zhou, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, A systematic scoping review of teaching and evaluating communications in the intensive care unit, 2021, 6, 24249270, 3, 10.29060/TAPS.2021-6-1/RA2351
    19. Cheryl Shumin Kow, Yao Hao Teo, Yao Neng Teo, Keith Zi Yuan Chua, Elaine Li Ying Quah, Nur Haidah Binte Ahmad Kamal, Lorraine Hui En Tan, Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong, Yun Ting Ong, Kuang Teck Tay, Min Chiam, Stephen Mason, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, A systematic scoping review of ethical issues in mentoring in medical schools, 2020, 20, 1472-6920, 10.1186/s12909-020-02169-3
    20. Amitabh Anand, Piera Centobelli, Roberto Cerchione, Why should I share knowledge with others? A review-based framework on events leading to knowledge hiding, 2020, 33, 0953-4814, 379, 10.1108/JOCM-06-2019-0174
    21. Onouma Thummapol, Tanya Park, Sylvia Barton, Exploring health services accessibility by indigenous women in Asia and identifying actions to improve it: a scoping review, 2020, 25, 1355-7858, 940, 10.1080/13557858.2018.1470607
    22. H. Fernández-Sánchez, K. King, C.B. Enríquez-Hernández, Revisiones Sistemáticas Exploratorias como metodología para la síntesis del conocimiento científico, 2020, 17, 2395-8421, 10.22201/eneo.23958421e.2020.1.697
    23. Alexander Gish, Niki Kiepek, Brenda Beagan, Methamphetamine use among gay men: An interpretive review of a non-sanctioned occupation, 2020, 27, 1442-7591, 26, 10.1080/14427591.2019.1643398
    24. Welma Lubbe, Wilma ten Ham-Baloyi, Karlien Smit, The integrative literature review as a research method: A demonstration review of research on neurodevelopmental supportive care in preterm infants, 2020, 26, 13551841, 308, 10.1016/j.jnn.2020.04.006
    25. Daniel Zhihao Hong, Annabelle Jia Sing Lim, Rei Tan, Yun Ting Ong, Anushka Pisupati, Eleanor Jia Xin Chong, Chrystie Wan Ning Quek, Jia Yin Lim, Jacquelin Jia Qi Ting, Min Chiam, Annelissa Mien Chew Chin, Alexia Sze Inn Lee, Limin Wijaya, Sandy Cook, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, A Systematic Scoping Review on Portfolios of Medical Educators, 2021, 8, 2382-1205, 238212052110003, 10.1177/23821205211000356
    26. Xiu Hui Tan, Malia Alexandra Foo, Shaun Li He Lim, Marie Bernadette Xin Yi Lim, Annelissa Mien Chew Chin, Jamie Zhou, Min Chiam, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, Teaching and assessing communication skills in the postgraduate medical setting: a systematic scoping review, 2021, 21, 1472-6920, 10.1186/s12909-021-02892-5
    27. Edison D. Macusi, Darshel Ester P. Estor, Elaine Q. Borazon, Misael B. Clapano, Mudjekeewis D. Santos, Environmental and Socioeconomic Impacts of Shrimp Farming in the Philippines: A Critical Analysis Using PRISMA, 2022, 14, 2071-1050, 2977, 10.3390/su14052977
    28. Lynn Varagona, Nancy M. Ballard, Margot (Lisa) Hedenstrom, Virtue ethics in health care teams; its time has come: Review of the nursing virtue ethics literature, 2022, 30, 0966-0429, 2394, 10.1111/jonm.13757
    29. Nail Sariyev, An assessment of selected tax burdens and reliefs of hidden champions: Theoretical comparison between Slovakia and Ireland, 2022, 11, 23066784, 346, 10.22495/jgrv11i2siart14
    30. Sem Vanbelleghem, Melissa De Regge, Yves Van Nieuwenhove, Paul Gemmel, Barriers and Enablers of Second-Order Problem-Solving Behavior: How Nurses Can Break Away From the Workaround Culture, 2022, 31, 1063-8628, 130, 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000385
    31. Jia Yin Lim, Simon Yew Kuang Ong, Chester Yan Hao Ng, Karis Li En Chan, Song Yi Elizabeth Anne Wu, Wei Zheng So, Glenn Jin Chong Tey, Yun Xiu Lam, Nicholas Lu Xin Gao, Yun Xue Lim, Ryan Yong Kiat Tay, Ian Tze Yong Leong, Nur Diana Abdul Rahman, Min Chiam, Crystal Lim, Gillian Li Gek Phua, Vengadasalam Murugam, Eng Koon Ong, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, A systematic scoping review of reflective writing in medical education, 2023, 23, 1472-6920, 10.1186/s12909-022-03924-4
    32. Zhi H. Ong, Lorraine H. E. Tan, Haziratul Z. B. Ghazali, Yun T. Ong, Jeffrey W. H. Koh, Rachel Z. E. Ang, Chermaine Bok, Min Chiam, Alexia S. I. Lee, Annelissa M. C. Chin, Jamie X. Zhou, Gene W. H. Chan, Gayathri D. Nadarajan, Lalit K. R. Krishna, A Systematic Scoping Review on Pedagogical Strategies of Interprofessional Communication for Physicians in Emergency Medicine, 2021, 8, 2382-1205, 238212052110417, 10.1177/23821205211041794
    33. Amanda Heffernan, Katrina MacDonald, Fiona Longmuir, The emotional intensity of educational leadership: a scoping review, 2022, 1360-3124, 1, 10.1080/13603124.2022.2042856
    34. Carolyn L. Elias, Kevin M. Gorey, Online Social Networking among Clinically Depressed Young People: Scoping Review of Potentially Supportive or Harmful Behaviors, 2022, 40, 1522-8835, 79, 10.1080/15228835.2021.2010163
    35. Ramana Piussi, Tora Berghdal, David Sundemo, Alberto Grassi, Stefano Zaffagnini, Mikael Sansone, Kristian Samuelsson, Eric Hamrin Senorski, Self-Reported Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety After ACL Injury: A Systematic Review, 2022, 10, 2325-9671, 232596712110664, 10.1177/23259671211066493
    36. Saeedeh Rezaee Vessal, Amitabh Anand, 2022, 978-1-80262-358-1, 61, 10.1108/S2754-586520220000001004
    37. Chong Yao Ho, Nicole-Ann Lim, Yun Ting Ong, Alexia Sze Inn Lee, Min Chiam, Gillian Phua Li Gek, Shiva Sarraf-Yazdi, Stephen Mason, Lalit Krishna, The impact of death and dying on the personhood of senior nurses at the National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS): a qualitative study, 2022, 21, 1472-684X, 10.1186/s12904-022-00974-9
    38. Gabriël Rafaël Cantaert, Peter Pype, Martin Valcke, Emelien Lauwerier, Interprofessional Identity in Health and Social Care: Analysis and Synthesis of the Assumptions and Conceptions in the Literature, 2022, 19, 1660-4601, 14799, 10.3390/ijerph192214799
    39. Onouma Thummapol, Werayuth Srithumsuk, Tanya Park, A scoping review of experiences and needs of older LGBTI adults in Asia, 2022, 34, 1053-8720, 403, 10.1080/10538720.2021.2006848
    40. Adina Cismaru-Inescu, Stéphane Adam, Anne Nobels, Philippe Kempeneers, Marie Beaulieu, Christophe Vandeviver, Ines Keygnaert, Laurent Nisen, The Elephant in the Room – A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of Older Adults’ Sexuality, 2022, 34, 1931-7611, 90, 10.1080/19317611.2021.1958040
    41. Charlotte Riordon, Sionnach Hendra, Christine Johnson, The politics of public health: A rapid review of the impact of public health reform on population health outcomes, 2021, 3, 2291-5796, 98, 10.25071/2291-5796.66
    42. Qi Wang, Ying Zhu, Shitong Xie, Mohammad Golam Kibria, Qiangqiang Guo, Ahmed Atef Belal, Yanfei Li, Jingyi Zhang, Yaolong Chen, Holger J. Schünemann, Michael G. Wilson, Kehu Yang, John N. Lavis, Facilitators, barriers and strategies for health-system guidance implementation: a critical interpretive synthesis protocol, 2022, 20, 1478-4505, 10.1186/s12961-022-00908-0
    43. Sadie Deschenes, Kaitlyn Tate, Shannon D. Scott, Diane Kunyk, Recommendations for navigating the experiences of moral distress: A scoping review, 2021, 122, 00207489, 104035, 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104035
    44. Atousa Ghahramani, Maximilian de Courten, Maria Prokofieva, “The potential of social media in health promotion beyond creating awareness: an integrative review”, 2022, 22, 1471-2458, 10.1186/s12889-022-14885-0
    45. Amitabh Anand, Ritu Tripathi, Anjana Karumathil, Tanvika Kalra, Applying systematic bibliometric methods to track a journal’s impact and review its knowledge contribution, 2022, 71, 2514-9342, 928, 10.1108/GKMC-04-2021-0064
    46. Eleanor Jia Xin Chong, Ming Jia Wang, Jia Yin Lim, Grace Shen Shen, Misha Jing Yi Chow, Kai Kee Koh, Annabelle Jia Sing Lim, Daniel Zhihao Hong, Jacquelin Jia Qi Ting, Anushka Pisupati, Betrand Kai Yang Lam, Yun Ting Ong, Min Chiam, Stephen Mason, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, Si Ying Tan, Surgical portfolios: A systematic scoping review, 2022, 10, 26662620, 100107, 10.1016/j.sipas.2022.100107
    47. Rei Tan, Jacquelin Jia Qi Ting, Daniel Zhihao Hong, Annabelle Jia Sing Lim, Yun Ting Ong, Anushka Pisupati, Eleanor Jia Xin Chong, Min Chiam, Alexia Sze Inn Lee, Laura Hui Shuen Tan, Annelissa Mien Chew Chin, Limin Wijaya, Warren Fong, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, Medical Student Portfolios: A Systematic Scoping Review, 2022, 9, 2382-1205, 238212052210760, 10.1177/23821205221076022
    48. Shirin Ziaei, Anne Hammarström, What social determinants outside paid work are related to development of mental health during life? An integrative review of results from the Northern Swedish Cohort, 2021, 21, 1471-2458, 10.1186/s12889-021-12143-3
    49. Katherine Sievert, Victoria Chen, Rebecca Voisin, Hope Johnson, Christine Parker, Mark Lawrence, Phillip Baker, Meat production and consumption for a healthy and sustainable Australian food system: Policy options and political dimensions, 2022, 33, 23525509, 674, 10.1016/j.spc.2022.08.007
    50. Bijaya Pokharel, Jane Yelland, Leesa Hooker, Angela Taft, A Systematic Review of Culturally Competent Family Violence Responses to Women in Primary Care, 2023, 24, 1524-8380, 928, 10.1177/15248380211046968
    51. Nail Sariyev, Janka Táborecká-Petrovičová, Performance measurement in a “hidden champion” company: An empirical study, 2022, 12, 20774303, 21, 10.22495/rgcv12i1p2
    52. Rui Song Ryan Ong, Ruth Si Man Wong, Ryan Choon Hoe Chee, Chrystie Wan Ning Quek, Neha Burla, Caitlin Yuen Ling Loh, Yu An Wong, Amanda Kay-Lyn Chok, Andrea York Tiang Teo, Aiswarya Panda, Sarah Wye Kit Chan, Grace Shen Shen, Ning Teoh, Annelissa Mien Chew Chin, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, A systematic scoping review moral distress amongst medical students, 2022, 22, 1472-6920, 10.1186/s12909-022-03515-3
    53. Mafole Sematlane, 2022, chapter 9, 9781668450345, 143, 10.4018/978-1-6684-5034-5.ch009
    54. Birgit Muskat, Amitabh Anand, Christine Contessotto, Adrian Heng Tsai Tan, Guihyun Park, Team familiarity—Boon for routines, bane for innovation? A review and future research agenda, 2022, 32, 10534822, 100892, 10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100892
    55. Areni Altun, Helen Brown, Liz Sturgiss, Grant Russell, Evaluating chronic pain interventions in recent refugees and immigrant populations: A systematic review, 2022, 105, 07383991, 1152, 10.1016/j.pec.2021.08.021
    56. Smruti Bulsari, Kiran Pandya, 2023, chapter 9, 9781668467459, 140, 10.4018/978-1-6684-6745-9.ch009
    57. Farid Karimi, Stakeholders’ Risk Perceptions of Decarbonised Energy System: Insights into Patterns of Behaviour, 2021, 14, 1996-1073, 7205, 10.3390/en14217205
    58. Kelly Jia Hui Teo, Mac Yu Kai Teo, Anushka Pisupati, Rui Song Ryan Ong, Chloe Keyi Goh, Claire Hui Xian Seah, You Ru Toh, Neha Burla, Natalie Song Yi Koh, Kuang Teck Tay, Yun Ting Ong, Min Chiam, Warren Fong, Limin Wijaya, Suzanne Pei Lin Goh, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, Assessing professional identity formation (PIF) amongst medical students in Oncology and Palliative Medicine postings: a SEBA guided scoping review, 2022, 21, 1472-684X, 10.1186/s12904-022-01090-4
    59. Emily C. Koller, Christine Berg, Anorexia Nervosa: A Narrative Review and Conceptual Practice Model, 2021, 37, 0164-212X, 403, 10.1080/0164212X.2021.1957064
    60. Paul Agu Igwe, Nnamdi O. Madichie, David Gamariel Rugara, Decolonising research approaches towards non-extractive research, 2022, 25, 1352-2752, 453, 10.1108/QMR-11-2021-0135
    61. Sherill Goh, Ruth Si Man Wong, Elaine Li Ying Quah, Keith Zi Yuan Chua, Wei Qiang Lim, Aubrey Ding Rui Ng, Xiu Hui Tan, Cheryl Shumin Kow, Yao Hao Teo, Elijah Gin Lim, Anushka Pisupati, Eleanor Jia Xin Chong, Nur Haidah Ahmad Kamal, Lorraine Hui En Tan, Kuang Teck Tay, Yun Ting Ong, Min Chiam, Alexia Sze Inn Lee, Annelissa Mien Chew Chin, Stephen Mason, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, Mentoring in palliative medicine in the time of covid-19: a systematic scoping review, 2022, 22, 1472-6920, 10.1186/s12909-022-03409-4
    62. Chrystie Wan Ning Quek, Ryan Rui Song Ong, Ruth Si Man Wong, Sarah Wye Kit Chan, Amanda Kay-Lyn Chok, Grace Shen Shen, Andrea York Tiang Teo, Aiswarya Panda, Neha Burla, Yu An Wong, Ryan Choon Hoe Chee, Caitlin Yuen Ling Loh, Kun Woo Lee, Gabrielle Hui Ning Tan, Ryan Emmanuel Jian Leong, Natalie Song Yi Koh, Yun Ting Ong, Annelissa Mien Chew Chin, Min Chiam, Crystal Lim, Xuelian Jamie Zhou, Simon Yew Kuang Ong, Eng Koon Ong, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, Systematic scoping review on moral distress among physicians, 2022, 12, 2044-6055, e064029, 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064029
    63. Abdul‐Ganiyu Fuseini, Lenore Ley, Helen Rawson, Bernice Redley, Debra Kerr, A systematic review of patient‐reported dignity and dignified care during acute hospital admission, 2022, 78, 0309-2402, 3540, 10.1111/jan.15370
    64. Huixin Huang, Rachelle Qi En Toh, Christine Li Ling Chiang, Ashiley Annushri Thenpandiyan, Prachi Simran Vig, Randal Wei Liang Lee, Min Chiam, Alexia Sze Inn Lee, Vijayendra Ranjan Baral, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, Impact of Dying Neonates on Doctors' and Nurses' Personhood: A Systematic Scoping Review, 2022, 63, 08853924, e59, 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.07.002
    65. Federico Cavallaro, Silvio Nocera, Integration of passenger and freight transport: A concept-centric literature review, 2022, 43, 22105395, 100718, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100718
    66. Keith Zi Yuan Chua, Elaine Li Ying Quah, Yun Xue Lim, Chloe Keyi Goh, Jieyu Lim, Darius Wei Jun Wan, Simone Meiqi Ong, Chi Sum Chong, Kennan Zhi Guang Yeo, Laura Shih Hui Goh, Ray Meng See, Alexia Sze Inn Lee, Yun Ting Ong, Min Chiam, Eng Koon Ong, Jamie Xuelian Zhou, Crystal Lim, Simon Yew Kuang Ong, Lalit Krishna, A systematic scoping review on patients’ perceptions of dignity, 2022, 21, 1472-684X, 10.1186/s12904-022-01004-4
    67. Bingjie Liu-Lastres, Beyond simple messaging: a review of crisis communication research in hospitality and tourism, 2022, 34, 0959-6119, 1959, 10.1108/IJCHM-11-2021-1404
    68. Vaishnavi Venktaramana, Eleanor Kei Ying Loh, Clarissa Jing Wen Wong, Jun Wei Yeo, Andrea York Tiang Teo, Celest Sin Yu Chiam, Dillon Jie Ming Foo, Faith Teo, Jonathan Liang, Vijayprasanth Raveendran, Luke Cheng Lin Chng, Shiwei Xiao, Kevin Chong, Seng Leong Quek, Christine Li Ling Chiang, Rachelle Qi En Toh, Caleb Wei Hao Ng, Elijah Gin Lim, Shariel Leong, Kuang Teck Tay, Amos Chan, Elisha Wan Ying Chia, Laura Hui Shuen Tan, Yun Ting Ong, Krish Sheri, Jun Xuan Ng, Annelissa Mien Chew Chin, Jamie Xuelian Zhou, Min Chiam, Alexia Sze Inn Lee, Stephen Mason, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, A systematic scoping review of communication skills training in medical schools between 2000 and 2020, 2022, 44, 0142-159X, 997, 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2054693
    69. Aamod D Shrestha, Johanne G Andersen, Dinesh Neupane, Sarita Ghimire, Christine Campbell, Per Kallestrup, Protocol for systematic literature review on implementation of cervical cancer screening and associated factors in Nepal from 2000 to 2018, 2020, 4, 2399-1623, 10.29392/001c.12505
    70. Carlee Wilson, Allyson Jones, Kara Schick-Makaroff, Esther S. Kim, Understanding the impact of group therapy on health-related quality of life of people with Aphasia: a scoping review, 2021, 2050-571X, 1, 10.1080/2050571X.2021.1917216
    71. Prachi Simran Vig, Jia Yin Lim, Randal Wei Liang Lee, Huixin Huang, Xiu Hui Tan, Wei Qiang Lim, Marie Bernadette Xin Yi Lim, Alexia Sze Inn Lee, Min Chiam, Crystal Lim, Vijayendra Ranjan Baral, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, Parental bereavement – impact of death of neonates and children under 12 years on personhood of parents: a systematic scoping review, 2021, 20, 1472-684X, 10.1186/s12904-021-00831-1
    72. Elaine Li Ying Quah, Keith Zi Yuan Chua, Jun Kiat Lua, Darius Wei Jun Wan, Chi Sum Chong, Yun Xue Lim, Lalit Krishna, A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Perspectives of Dignity and Assisted Dying, 2023, 65, 08853924, e123, 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.10.004
    73. Onouma Thummapol, Sadaf Murad, Oluwakemi Amodu, Megan Kennedy, Exploring the Therapeutic Effects of Music Intervention Embedded With Binaural Beats on Health and Well-Being of Older People: A Scoping Review, 2024, 0733-4648, 10.1177/07334648241275965
    74. Yao Hao Teo, Tan Ying Peh, Ahmad Bin Hanifah Marican Abdurrahman, Alexia Sze Inn Lee, Min Chiam, Warren Fong, Limin Wijaya, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, A modified Delphi approach to nurturing professionalism in postgraduate medical education in Singapore, 2024, 65, 0037-5675, 313, 10.11622/smedj.2021224
    75. Natalie E. Pope, Emily A. Greenfield, Laura Keyes, Elizabeth Russell, A Review of Public Sector Engagement in Age-Friendly Community Initiatives, 2024, 0895-9420, 1, 10.1080/08959420.2024.2376934
    76. Sunny C Okoroafor, Christmal Dela Christmals, Optimizing the roles of health workers to improve access to health services in Africa: an implementation framework for task shifting and sharing for policy and practice, 2023, 23, 1472-6963, 10.1186/s12913-023-09848-z
    77. Gábor Rónaföldi-Széll, Succession and gender dynamics in family firms – A systematic literature review and future research agenda, 2024, 55, 01330179, 59, 10.14267/VEZTUD.2024.07-08.06
    78. Nami Kawakyu, Megan Coe, Bradley H. Wagenaar, Kenneth Sherr, Sarah Gimbel, Edward Nicol, Refining the Performance of Routine Information System Management (PRISM) framework for data use at the local level: An integrative review, 2023, 18, 1932-6203, e0287635, 10.1371/journal.pone.0287635
    79. Michal Kaššaj, Tomáš Peráček, Synergies and Potential of Industry 4.0 and Automated Vehicles in Smart City Infrastructure, 2024, 14, 2076-3417, 3575, 10.3390/app14093575
    80. Johan Högberg, Ramana Piussi, Johan Lövgren, Mathias Wernbom, Rebecca Simonsson, Kristian Samuelsson, Eric Hamrin Senorski, Restoring Knee Flexor Strength Symmetry Requires 2 Years After ACL Reconstruction, But Does It Matter for Second ACL Injuries? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, 2024, 10, 2198-9761, 10.1186/s40798-023-00666-5
    81. Cara Evans, Julia Abelson, Nick Kates, Alice Cavanagh, John N. Lavis, Tommaso Martino, A Multilevel Framework for Complex Care: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis, 2023, 2023, 1365-2524, 1, 10.1155/2023/4487200
    82. Jasmine Svantesson, Ramana Piussi, Elin Weissglas, Eleonor Svantesson, Alexandra Horvath, Erik Börjesson, Andy Williams, Robert Prill, Kristian Samuelsson, Eric Hamrin Senorski, Shedding light on the non-operative treatment of the forgotten side of the knee: rehabilitation of medial collateral ligament injuries—a systematic review, 2024, 10, 2055-7647, e001750, 10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001750
    83. Zoe Guerrero, Dagmar Civišová, Petr Winkler, Mental health and access to care among the Roma population in Europe: A scoping review, 2024, 61, 1363-4615, 118, 10.1177/13634615231200853
    84. Palaniappan Ganesh Nagappan, Samuel Brown, Alex McManus, Sarah Sayers, Shazia Absar, Sapphire Rou Xi Tan, Isla Kuhn, Edward Lau, Charlotte Tulinius, Changes in medical student attendance and its impact on student educational outcomes: a systematic review protocol, 2024, 14, 2044-6055, e078252, 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078252
    85. Begetayinoral Kussia Lahole, Tesfahun Simon, Wondimu Ewunetu, Wondafrash Kussia, Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis on intention to screen for cervical cancer and predictors among women of reproductive age in Ethiopia, 2024, 2, 2753-4294, e000585, 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000585
    86. Katja Rogers, Teresa Hirzle, Sukran Karaosmanoglu, Paula Toledo Palomino, Ekaterina Durmanova, Seiji Isotani, Lennart E. Nacke, An Umbrella Review of Reporting Quality in CHI Systematic Reviews: Guiding Questions and Best Practices for HCI, 2024, 31, 1073-0516, 1, 10.1145/3685266
    87. Gillian Li Gek Phua, Jasmine Lerk Juan Owyong, Ian Tze Yong Leong, Suzanne Goh, Nagavalli Somasundaram, Eileen Yi Ling Poon, Anupama Roy Chowdhury, Simon Yew Kuang Ong, Crystal Lim, Vengadasalam Murugam, Eng Koon Ong, Stephen Mason, Ruaridh Hill, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, A systematic scoping review of group reflection in medical education, 2024, 24, 1472-6920, 10.1186/s12909-024-05203-w
    88. Yvonne Fitzmaurice, Suzanne Beeke, Jytte Isaksen, Una Cunningham, Caroline Jagoe, Éidín Ní Shé, Ruth McMenamin, Communication partner training for student health and social care professionals engaging with people with stroke acquired communication difficulties: A protocol for a realist review., 2024, 6, 2515-4826, 60, 10.12688/hrbopenres.13783.2
    89. Anne Hammarström, Hugo Westerlund, Urban Janlert, Pekka Virtanen, Shirin Ziaei, Per-Olof Östergren, How do labour market conditions explain the development of mental health over the life-course? A conceptual integration of the ecological model with life-course epidemiology in an integrative review of results from the Northern Swedish Cohort, 2024, 24, 1471-2458, 10.1186/s12889-024-18461-6
    90. Jodie Gill, Alexis Jones, Klara Price, Egan Goodison, Philip Tyson, A mixed‐method systematic review of the perspectives of young people, carers and professionals on psychiatric diagnosis in childhood and adolescence, 2024, 37, 1073-6077, 10.1111/jcap.12459
    91. Amalia Kouskoura, Eleni Kalliontzi, Dimitrios Skalkos, Ioannis Bakouros, Assessing the Key Factors Measuring Regional Competitiveness, 2024, 16, 2071-1050, 2574, 10.3390/su16062574
    92. Anu-Riina Svenlin, Tiina Lehto-Lundén, Respite care from the child’s perspective – The Support Family Intervention in Finland, 2023, 47, 0308-5759, 138, 10.1177/03085759231176566
    93. Ramana Piussi, Rebecca Simonson, Bálint Zsidai, Alberto Grassi, Jon Karlsson, Francesco Della Villa, Kristian Samuelsson, Eric Hamrin Senorski, Better Safe Than Sorry? A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis on Time to Return to Sport After ACL Reconstruction as a Risk Factor for Second ACL Injury, 2024, 54, 0190-6011, 161, 10.2519/jospt.2023.11977
    94. Yun Xue Lim, Elaine Li Ying Quah, Keith Zi Yuan Chua, Casper Keegan Lin Ronggui, Ranitha Govindasamy, Simone Meiqi Ong, Eng Koon Ong, Gillian Li Gek Phua, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, A Systematic Scoping Review on Dignity Assessment Tools, 2024, 67, 08853924, e263, 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.12.008
    95. Elaine Li Ying Quah, Keith Zi Yuan Chua, Casper Keegan Ronggui Lin, Andrew Vimal Vijayan, Nur Amira Binte Abdul Hamid, Jasmine Lerk Juan Owyong, Neeta Satku, Natalie Woong, Crystal Lim, Gillian Li Gek Phua, Eng Koon Ong, Warren Fong, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, The role of patients’ stories in medicine: a systematic scoping review, 2023, 22, 1472-684X, 10.1186/s12904-023-01319-w
    96. Tim Stroh, Anne-Laure Mention, Cameron Duff, The impact of evolved psychological mechanisms on innovation and adoption: A systematic literature review, 2023, 125, 01664972, 102759, 10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102759
    97. Neha Burla, Rui Song Ryan Ong, Ryan Choon Hoe Chee, Ruth Si Man Wong, Shao Yun Neo, Nur Amira Binte Abdul Hamid, Crystal Lim, Eng Koon Ong, Nagavalli Somasundaram, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, A systematic scoping review on group non-written reflections in medical education, 2024, 24, 1472-6920, 10.1186/s12909-024-06117-3
    98. Rita Elaine Silver, Vinay Kumar, Deborah Chua Fengyi, Michael Tan Lip Thye, Johannis Auri Bin Abdul Aziz, For What and for Whom? Expanding the Role of Research Syntheses for Diverse Stakeholders, 2024, 53, 0013-189X, 464, 10.3102/0013189X241285414
    99. Yvonne Fitzmaurice, Suzanne Beeke, Jytte Isaksen, Una Cunningham, Caroline Jagoe, Éidín Ní Shé, Ruth McMenamin, Communication partner training for student health and social care professionals engaging with people with stroke acquired communication difficulties: A realist review., 2023, 6, 2515-4826, 60, 10.12688/hrbopenres.13783.1
    100. Danielle Allard, Tami Oliphant, With a Little Help from Our Friends: Applying a Critical Friends Orientation to Critical Literature Reviews, 2024, 61, 2373-9231, 13, 10.1002/pra2.1004
    101. Sunday Adeola Ajagbe, Joseph Bamidele Awotunde, Ademola Temidayo Opadotun, Matthew O. Adigun, 2023, Chapter 4, 978-981-99-5084-3, 39, 10.1007/978-981-99-5085-0_4
    102. Darius Wei Jun Wan, Laura Shih Hui Goh, Mac Yu Kai Teo, Celestine Jia Ling Loh, Gerald Hng Kai Yak, Joanna Jing Hui Lee, Nila Ravindran, Nur Diana Abdul Rahman, Min Chiam, Eng Koon Ong, Nagavalli Somasundaram, Ying Yin Lim, Gillian Li Gek Phua, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, Enhancing self-care education amongst medical students: a systematic scoping review, 2024, 24, 1472-6920, 10.1186/s12909-023-04965-z
    103. Tea Rosic, Elizabeth Lovell, Harriet MacMillan, Zainab Samaan, Rebecca L Morgan, Components of Outpatient Child and Youth Concurrent Disorders Programs: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis: Composantes des programmes de troubles concomitants des enfants et des jeunes ambulatoires : une synthèse interprétative critique, 2024, 69, 0706-7437, 381, 10.1177/07067437231212037
    104. Katherine P. Kelly, Kathleen A. Knafl, Susan Keller, Pamela S. Hinds, Thematic expansion: A new strategy for theory development, 2021, 43, 0193-9459, 962, 10.1177/0193945920984795
    105. Rahma K. Dewi, Sri Sumarni, Parenting style and family empowerment for children's growth and development: a systematic review, 2023, 14, 2038-9930, 8, 10.4081/jphia.2023.2582
    106. Milou S. H. van Dieën, Wolter Paans, Massimo A. Mariani, Willem Dieperink, Fredrike Blokzijl, Roles and competencies of nurses and physicians in shared decision‐making in cardiac surgery: A scoping review, 2024, 80, 0309-2402, 60, 10.1111/jan.15811
    107. Katarzyna Turoń, Factors Affecting Car-Sharing Services, 2023, 6, 2624-6511, 1185, 10.3390/smartcities6020057
    108. Tiago Bigolin, Edson Talamini, Impacts of Climate Change Scenarios on the Corn and Soybean Double-Cropping System in Brazil, 2024, 12, 2225-1154, 42, 10.3390/cli12030042
    109. Vitaliano Fiorillo, Biagio Maria Amico, Milk Quality and Economic Sustainability in Dairy Farming: A Systematic Review of Performance Indicators, 2024, 5, 2624-862X, 384, 10.3390/dairy5030031
    110. Astrid Bertrand, Tiphaine Viard, Rafik Belloum, James R. Eagan, Winston Maxwell, 2023, On Selective, Mutable and Dialogic XAI: a Review of What Users Say about Different Types of Interactive Explanations, 9781450394215, 1, 10.1145/3544548.3581314
    111. Jelena Komanchuk, Judy L. Cameron, Stefan Kurbatfinski, Linda Duffett-Leger, Nicole Letourneau, A realist review of digitally delivered child development assessment and screening tools: Psychometrics and considerations for future use, 2023, 183, 03783782, 105818, 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2023.105818
    112. Jonathan Zhen Liang, Donovan Kai Wei Ng, Vijayprasanth Raveendran, Mac Yu Kai Teo, Elaine Li Ying Quah, Keith Zi Yuan Chua, Jun Kiat Lua, Jasmine Lerk Juan Owyong, Andrew Vimal Vijayan, Nur Amira Binte Abdul Hamid, Ting Ting Yeoh, Eng Koon Ong, Gillian Li Gek Phua, Stephen Mason, Warren Fong, Crystal Lim, Natalie Woong, Simon Yew Kuang Ong, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, Marsa Gholamzadeh, The impact of online education during the Covid-19 pandemic on the professional identity formation of medical students: A systematic scoping review, 2024, 19, 1932-6203, e0296367, 10.1371/journal.pone.0296367
    113. Rosa Angélica Priego Morales, Management leadership in the New Mexican School and teacher revaluation from the recognition of human talent: a scoping review, 2024, 29546168, 10.58763/rc2024197
    114. Nofie Iman, Service modularity in the digital era: integrating environmental sustainability and post-pandemic insights, 2024, 1756-669X, 10.1108/IJQSS-05-2023-0061
    115. Camila F. Pfeiffer, Wendy L. Magee, Rebecca Fülöp, Travis C. Nace, Candela Castro, Agustina Iturri, Jimena Franceschi, Gabriela Echauri, Liliana Gassull, María Julieta Russo, Exploring Music-Based Interventions for Executive Functioning and Emotional Well-Being in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review, 2024, 5, 2673-4087, 565, 10.3390/neurosci5040041
    116. Verónica Estruch-García, María Dolores Gil-Llario, Estefanía Ruiz-Palomino, Olga Fernández-García, Vicente Morell-Mengual, Zélia Ferreira Caçador Anastácio, Systematic Integrative Review: Sex Education for People with Autism Spectrum Disorder, 2025, 43, 0146-1044, 10.1007/s11195-024-09877-4
    117. Kari Dee Vallury, Amanda Asher, Olivia Sarri, Nicola Sheeran, Jami Leichliter, Characteristics and determinants of quality non-directive pregnancy options counselling: a scoping review, 2025, 22, 1448-5028, 10.1071/SH24170
    118. Kirsten M. Greer, Kyla M. Cary, Morgan E. PettyJohn, Gianna Casaburo, Carin Graves, Kristen N. Jozkowski, A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of Women’s Experiences of Internalized Sociocultural Sexual Pressure, 2025, 0022-4499, 1, 10.1080/00224499.2025.2451144
    119. Wei Chen Chang, Wan Zi Lin, Wen-Zhi Chen, Wen-Ko Chiou, Oliver Shinbou Lin, Design-driven innovation in the public sector: insights from case studies of initiatives in Taiwan, 2025, 1751-6234, 1, 10.1080/17516234.2025.2457166
    120. Hiroyuki Suzuki, Yusuke Tsuboko, Manabu Tamura, Ken Masamune, Kiotaka Iwasaki, Synthesis of the clinical utilities and issues of intraoperative imaging devices in clinical reports: a systematic review and thematic synthesis, 2025, 25, 1472-6947, 10.1186/s12911-025-02915-x
    121. Charles Birungi, Michael A. Obst, Using economics to advance health equity: What we know, don't know and need to know (but may never know) from Markus Haacker, 2025, 2, 2994-4694, 10.1080/29944694.2025.2456791
    122. Abdullah Almunifi, Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Metabolic Bariatric Surgery (MBS) and Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS): A Literature Review, 2025, Volume 17, 1178-7082, 161, 10.2147/OAS.S482690
    123. Yoeurng Sak, Paradise Ros, Reviewing Needs and Techniques of Mentors for Mentoring New Teachers , 2025, 14, 2327-2619, 52, 10.11648/j.edu.20251402.13
    124. Luke Tan, Sonia Sheri, Yun Yao Goh, Raeanne Fong, Ranitha Govindasamy, Yun Ting Ong, Nur Amira Binte Abdul Hamid, Tessa Li Xiang Low, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna, Experiences of healthcare professionals providing palliative care in home settings - a scoping review, 2025, 24, 1472-684X, 10.1186/s12904-025-01728-z
    125. Kathleen Parry, Christopher Picard, Rashmi Devkota, Kaitlyn Tate, Emergency Department Navigator Interventions and Outcome Measures: A Scoping Review, 2025, 20, 1748-3735, 10.1111/opn.70026
    126. Ольга Подпалова, Євдокія Решетнік, Олександр Ковальчук, Ірина Прибитько, Руслан Мневець, ПІДВИЩЕННЯ ІННОВАЦІЙНОСТІ МЕДИЧНОЇ ОСВІТИ ЧЕРЕЗ СТУДЕНТСЬКІ НАУКОВІ ОБ’ЄДНАННЯ, 2025, 2710-3056, 479, 10.36074/grail-of-science.10.01.2025.071
    127. Douglas S. Lownsbery, A Synthesis Review of Four Literature Reviews of Disaster Risk Reduction Education for Children, 2025, 22124209, 105555, 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105555
    128. Chiara Bernuzzi, Giulia Paganin, Sara Petrilli, Simona Margheritti, Old trends in new clothing? Exploring the quiet quitting phenomenon through a scoping review, 2025, 1046-1310, 10.1007/s12144-025-07920-x
    129. Giti Bahrami, Nooshin Ghavidel, Zohreh Mahmoodi, Ronan McDermott, Hamed Seddighi, The health effects of climate change: identifying strategies, policies, and knowledge gaps: an umbrella review, 2025, 0960-3123, 1, 10.1080/09603123.2025.2498624
    130. Ukachukwu O Abaraogu, Philippa Dall, Chris Seenan, Sarah Rhodes, Trish Gorely, Joanna McParland, Julie Brittenden, Ebuka M Anieto, Lorna Booth, Cathy Gormal, Jeremy Dearling, Candida Fenton, Sarah Audsley, Kimberley Fairer, Lindsay Bearne, Dawn A Skelton, Behaviour change interventions to promote physical activity in people with intermittent claudication: the OPTIMA systematic review, 2025, 2046-4924, 1, 10.3310/ZBNG5240
    131. David Steingard, Kathleen Rodenburg, Assessing the Societal Impact of Academic Research With Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Scoping Review of Business School Scholarship as a ‘Force for Good’, 2025, 38, 0953-1513, 10.1002/leap.2010
    132. Quan Nha Hong, Ginny Brunton, Helping Trainees Understand the Strategies to Minimize Errors and Biases in Systematic Review Approaches, 2025, 41, 0167-8329, 161, 10.1177/01678329251323445
    133. Charan Bijlani, Denise Ndlovu, Dianna Smith, Claire Thompson, Leandro Garcia, Cornelia Junghans, Eszter P. Vamos, Paraskevi Seferidi, Understanding food insecurity in England: a systems-based approach, 2025, 2574-1292, 1, 10.1080/25741292.2025.2523114
    134. Julie B. Grant, Jacqueline Jones, Carey Candrian, Kathleen S. Oman, Sean M. Reed, The Role of Nursing Communication: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis, 2025, 2666142X, 100373, 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100373
    135. Emma L. Kuster, Doo H. Lim, Gamifying climate content to enhance climate literacy: Opportunities for adult learners, 2025, 1089-9995, 1, 10.1080/10899995.2025.2531580
    136. A Critical Review of CSR Projects and Their Impacts on Infrastructural and Social Development, 2025, 14, 2278-2540, 1066, 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1406000117
    137. O. A. Tunkevichus, Higher education readiness to implement artifi cial intelligence: a bibliometric analysis, 2025, 60, 01300105, 319, 10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-60-3-14
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2016 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5864) PDF downloads(1100) Cited by(5)

Figures and Tables

Figures(4)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog