
Citation: Mohammed Maikudi Usman, Arezoo Dadrasnia, Kang Tzin Lim, Ahmad Fahim Mahmud, Salmah Ismail. Application of biosurfactants in environmental biotechnology; remediation of oil and heavy metal[J]. AIMS Bioengineering, 2016, 3(3): 289-304. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2016.3.289
[1] | Qing Ye, Qiaojia Zhang, Sijie Liu, Kaiqiang Chen . A novel chaotic system based on coupled map lattice and its application in HEVC encryption. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 9410-9429. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021463 |
[2] | Min Liu, Guodong Ye . A new DNA coding and hyperchaotic system based asymmetric image encryption algorithm. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(4): 3887-3906. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021194 |
[3] | Yuzhen Zhou, Erxi Zhu, Shan Li . An image encryption algorithm based on the double time-delay Lorenz system. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(10): 18491-18522. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023821 |
[4] | Zilong Liu, Jingbing Li, Jing Liu . Encrypted face recognition algorithm based on Ridgelet-DCT transform and THM chaos. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(2): 1373-1387. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022063 |
[5] | Zhenjun Tang, Yongzheng Yu, Hanyun Zhang, Mengzhu Yu, Chunqiang Yu, Xianquan Zhang . Robust image hashing via visual attention model and ring partition. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(5): 6103-6120. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019305 |
[6] | Li-na Zhang, Chen-yu Cui, Xiao-yu Zhang, Wei Wu . Adaptive visual cryptography scheme design based on QR codes. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(12): 12160-12179. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022566 |
[7] | Kaimeng Chen, Chin-Chen Chang . High-capacity reversible data hiding in encrypted images based on two-phase histogram shifting. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(5): 3947-3964. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019195 |
[8] | Xianyi Chen, Mengling Zou, Bin Yang, Zhenli Wang, Nannan Wu, Lili Qi . A visually secure image encryption method based on integer wavelet transform and rhombus prediction. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(2): 1722-1739. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021089 |
[9] | Qi Wang, John Blesswin A, T Manoranjitham, P Akilandeswari, Selva Mary G, Shubhangi Suryawanshi, Catherine Esther Karunya A . Securing image-based document transmission in logistics and supply chain management through cheating-resistant visual cryptographic protocols. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(11): 19983-20001. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023885 |
[10] | Amit Kumar, Jehad Alzabut, Sudesh Kumari, Mamta Rani, Renu Chugh . Dynamical properties of a novel one dimensional chaotic map. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(3): 2489-2505. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022115 |
With rapid development of the Internet, information technology, and digital communications, the status of multimedia data transmission is increasing in modern society. Image is an important information carrier in human life to display or describe directly the objective phenomena. In recent years, owing to leakages of digital image information, serious consequences have occurred. Thus, image encryption protection has become particularly important. Traditional encryption algorithms store and encrypt data as a one-dimensional string. As to images, due to the large amount of data, the calculation of encryption schemes is complicated, and the high correlation between the adjacent pixels requires a sufficient long keystream for a high security level. Therefore, a new encryption algorithm needs to be proposed for the secure communication of images.
A chaotic system refers to a deterministic system with seemingly random irregular movements, and its behavior is uncertain, unrepeatable, and unpredictable. Chaotic system is sensitive to initial conditions, and exhibits pseudorandom, ergodicity, and aperiodicity [1]. The combination of an image encryption algorithm and a chaotic system can effectively improve security and anti-cracking ability. Therefore, chaotic systems have been widely used in image encryption algorithms since they were proposed. For example, in [2], an algorithm with one-time-keys was proposed to resist brute-force attack. Albahrani et al. [3] designed a block method based image encryption with a cross map as a kind of chaotic map. To improve the robustness against common attacks, Yu et al. [4] proposed a new image encryption algorithm based on a short-time fractional Fourier transform (FrFT) and a hyperchaotic system. The diffusion operation and feedback system were designed to improve the anti-interference ability. Moreover, the use of the hyperchaotic system increases the key space and enhances sensitivity to all keys. In [5], a color image encryption algorithm was proposed by using a hyperchaotic system, of which can compress and encrypt an image according to the requirements of the reconstructed image quality. To hide efficiently the pixel distribution for the plain image, DNA based method was employed in [6] with the help of DNA random encoding rules. A generalized chaotic map and operation of fractional-order edge dection were applied into image encryption algorithm [7]. Besides of time domain encryption, Borujeni and Eshghi [8] suggested a hybrid domain based image encryption scheme including both frequency and time domains. Hybrid chaotic systems [9,10] were also be designed and applied for color image encryption Liu et al. [11] designed a new pathological image encryption scheme to ensure the secure transmission of pathological images in a telemedicine system. To effectively resist the plaintext attacks, Feng et al. [12] combined the discrete logarithm with a memristor-based chaotic system and proposed an image reconstruction encryption algorithm. The finite multiplication group used in this study has up to 128 generators, which can expand the key space and enhance the ability of the image encryption algorithm in resisting plaintext attacks. To compress multiple images into a small amount of data for the convenience of image transmission, Huang et al. [13] presented a nonlinear optical image encryption scheme that can encrypt images in both spatial and frequency domains, in which phase truncation and bitwise exclusive-OR (XOR) operation improve the robustness of the multi-image encryption scheme. In [14], a simple and efficient image encryption scheme was designed based on multiple piece-wise linear chaotic map systems. Rotational permutation operations and block diffusion operations were implemented to reach good encryption effect. Wang and Gao [15] studied the application of matrix semi-tensor product theory in a new chaotic image encryption with a Boolean network, scrambling, and diffusion. A new method of global pixel diffusion [16] by chaotic sequences was proposed for image encryption with a high security. In [17], a three-dimensional bit-level based image encryption algorithm was presented. Both the Rubik's cube method and the bit-level encryption principle were taken to realize scrambling operation. Some other image encryption algorithms [18,19,20] also show good performance by different hyeer-chaotic system, coupled map, and 2D chaotic map.
Arnold transformation is a common image pixel scrambling algorithm used to reduce the high correlation between pixels. Based on Arnold transformation and singular value decomposition (SVD) in the fractional Hartley domain, a new phase image encryption scheme was proposed in [21]. Liu et al. [22] suggested a color image encryption algorithm using Arnold transformation and color mixing operation in the discrete cosine transform (DCT) domain. Arnold transformation was used to scramble the pixels of the three channels in color image, and the DCT was used to change the pixel values in the entire spatial distribution. Sui and Gao [23] proposed a color image encryption scheme using Gyrator transform and Arnold transformation, which has two security levels to protect image content. In the encryption and decryption processes, the rotation angle of the gyrator, number of iterations in Arnold transformation, parameters of the chaotic mapping, and generated accompanying phase function were all treated as the secret keys, thereby improving the security of the system. In [24], an optical color image encryption technique based on Arnold transformation and interferometry was proposed. Color image was decomposed into three channels R, G, B, and then each channel was encrypted into two random phase masks using Arnold transformation and interference method. Chen [25] used Arnold transformation to perturb the matrix pixels by encoding a single parameter, to form an image similar to color noise and to reduce the key space for storage and transmission applications. Wang et al. [26] suggested a fast algorithm for image encryption by parallel computing, in which parallelism of diffusion is designed to implement fast operation.
According to the classification of cryptosystems, cryptography can be divided into symmetric cryptography [27,28,29,30] and asymmetric (public key) cryptography [31,32,33,34,35,36]. In an asymmetric encryption algorithm, different keys are used for encrypting and decrypting, thereby realizing the nonlinearity of the algorithm, higher security, and convenient implementation of digital signature and verification. In [33], a scalable method of asymmetric image compression and encryption was proposed based on a discrete wavelet transform (DWT) and nonlinear operations in the cylindrical diffraction domain. DWT reduces the amount of data and is more conducive to data transmission. To enhance an encryption scheme with a larger key space than traditional cryptographic systems in the FT and FrFT fields, Ren et al. [37] designed an asymmetric image encryption scheme using a phase-truncated discrete multi-parameter FrFT. After a pixel scrambling and a random-phase mask, the asymmetric ciphertext with stable white noise was obtained through phase truncation.
In order to reduce the redundancy of image transmission, compression was also considered in image encryption. For example, Chai et al. [38] proposed a visually meaningful cipher image encryption by using technology of compressive sensing. Chaotic system, kronecker product, and singular value decomposition were all combined to produce the measurement matrix. In [39], a new chaotic color image encryption scheme was presented by multi-embedding strategy and compressive sensing. Each channel of R, G, and B were compressed to obtain measurements. Although there are many new image encryption algorithms have been published, some of them still have defects, for example, (i) The keystream is generated only dependent on the secret keys; (ⅱ) It is hard to ensure the secure management of keys. In view of this, this paper combines quantum logistic map, Arnold transformation, and diffusion technology together with RSA to design an asymmetric encryption scheme, aiming to carry out high security, strong anti-attack and more suitable for network transmission. The innovations of this paper are: 1) Extract the text information of the plain image to be plain message. 2) Generate the cipher message by RSA and produce the initial conditions for quantum system by a new mathematical model. 3) Update the initial conditions by the text information of the plain image to enhance the plaintext dependence. 4) Build an end-to-start cyclic modulo diffusion operation.
The rest of this article is organized as follows. Section 2 briefly introduces the public key RSA algorithm, Arnold transformation, and quantum logistic map. Section 3 gives the image encryption and decryption processes. Section 4 displays some experimental results. Section 5 discusses the various analytical tests of the encryption results. Section 6 presents the conclusions of this study.
The public key RSA cryptosystem was proposed in 1978 by Rivest, Shamir, and Adleman. RSA encryption algorithm is an asymmetric encryption structure, which can complete the decryption operation without directly passing the keys. This method ensures security and avoids the risk of keys being cracked, which typically happens when keys are transmitted directly. In the whole encryption process, the key and algorithm are independently separated. Therefore, the key can be distributed more effectively. The specific description of the RSA algorithm is as follows:
Step 1: Randomly and secretly choose two large prime numbers p and q.
Step 2: Compute n=p×q, φ(n)=(p−1)(q−1), where φ(n) is the Euler function of n.
Step 3: Randomly select e in range 1<e<φ(n), satisfying gcd(e,φ(n))=1, where e and φ(n) are prime numbers.
Step 4: Calculate the decryption key d, where e×d=1mod(φ(n)).
Step 5: Open integers n and e, and keep d in secret.
Step 6: Encrypt plaintext m to be ciphertext c by c=memodn.
Step 7: Decrypt ciphertext c to be plaintext m by m=cdmodn.
Logistic map is a classical mathematical model used to study the behaviors of complex systems, such as dynamic systems, fractals, and chaos. In physics, if a physical quantity has the smallest indivisible basic unit, then this physical quantity is quantized, and the smallest unit is called a quantum. The quantum state is introduced into the chaotic system to form a quantum logistic map. The coupling of the system and harmonic oscillator path will produce a quantum logistic map with quantum correction. Akhshani et al. [40] applied quantum logistic map for image encryption, and its quantum logistic map is defined as,
{xn+1=r(xn−|xn|2)−rynyn+1=−yne−2β+e−βr[(2−xn−x∗n)yn−xnz∗n−x∗nzn]zn+1=−zne−2β+e−βr[2(1−x∗n)zn−2xnyn−xn} | (1) |
where β and r represent the dissipation parameter and adjustable parameter, respectively, and x∗n, z∗n are the conjugate complex numbers of xn and zn, respectively. When one sets r=3.99 and β⩾6, the quantum logistic map shows higher chaotic characteristics [40]. So, in this study, r=3.99 and β=7 are set with all initial parameters be real numbers. As pointed by [40]: classical nonlinear chaotic systems are famous because of their exponential sensitivity to each initial condition. However, the linearity of quantum mechanics not only shows such sensitivity to each initial condition, and also the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (HUP) prevents us from talking about initial conditions in quantum mechanics. Therefore, for this interesting property, quantum logistic map can also be used in cryptography, for example image encryption. In view of these good characteristics of quantum logistic map, many image encryption algorithms [41,42,43] based on it have been proposed.
Arnold transformation is a scrambling operation that can randomly change the pixel position for an image, which is also called a cat map. By rearranging the pixels in a digital image matrix, the originally meaningful image will become a meaningless image. Arnold transformation is defined as follows:
[xn+1yn+1]=[1112][xnyn]modN | (2) |
By replacing the matrix of above Arnold transformation, a generalized Arnold transformation can be obtained, which is defined as
[xn+1yn+1]=[1baab+1][xnyn]modN | (3) |
where a,b and N are positive integers, (xn,yn) are the coordinates of the pixel in the original image, and (xn+1,yn+1) are the coordinate positions after transformation. Arnold transformation is a reversible mapping, and its corresponding inverse transformation is defined as
[xn+1yn+1]=[ab+1−b−a1][xnyn]modN | (4) |
Arnold transformation is reversible, and it is easy to be implemented. Therefore, this study combines Arnold transformation with the quantum logistic system and other technologies to design a new image encryption scheme.
This study integrates the quantum logistic map, the RSA algorithm, the Arnold transformation, and the diffusion operation to realize a new asymmetric image encryption scheme. The framework of the proposed image encryption scheme is shown in Figure 1. The detail encryption steps are as follows:
Step 1: Select large prime numbers p and q, and calculate public key e and private key d.
Step 2: Read plain image P with size M×N.
Step 3: Extract the text information of the image, i.e., R=∑Mi=1∑Nj=1P(i,j), for public information.
Step 4: Select three plain parameters ai(i=1,2,3) and encrypt them with the public key to obtain the public parameters ci=aeimodn.
Step 5: Calculate the initial values: x0=(c1+a1)/(k1c1+k2a1), y0=(c2+a2)/(k1c2+k2a2), z0=(c3+a3)/(k1c3+k2a3), where k1=3,k2=5.
Step 6: Update the initial values: x′0=mod(x0+R1,1), y′0=mod(y0+R1,1), z′0=mod(z0+R1,1), where R1=(R+1)/(255×M×N+1).
Step 7: The updated initial values are substituted into quantum logistic map. After discarding the first 500 values of the sequence, the chaotic sequences x,y,z are obtained.
Step 8: Process the sequences as,
{X=mod(fix(x(1:M)×1014),256)Y=mod(fix(y(1:N)×1014),256)Z=mod(fix(z×1014),256) | (5) |
Step 9: Perform Arnold scrambling operation on the plain image to obtain the scrambled image . The values of , , and in the Arnold map are calculated as
ma=mod(sum(X),mc)+1 | (6) |
mb=mod(sum(Y),mc)+1 | (7) |
where mc=mod(sum(Z),R)+1.
Step 10: For the image A, perform XOR diffusion operation by row for it to obtain image B as,
Bi=Ai⊕Xi | (8) |
where i=1,2,⋯,M.
Step 11: Perform diffusion under modulo operation by row again to obtain image C as,
Ci=mod(Bi+Zi+Ci−1,256) | (9) |
where i=1,2,⋯,M. C0 is a constant.
Step 12: Connect the last row of image C with the first row of C and perform diffusion under modulo operation for rows again to obtain image D as,
D1=mod(C1+Z1+CM,256) | (10) |
Di=mod(Ci+Zi+Di−1,256) | (11) |
where i=2,3,⋯,M.
Step 13: The column direction is similar to the row direction. For image D, take the column as a unit and perform the XOR diffusion operation on the corresponding component of each column and Y to obtain image E as,
Ej=Dj⊕Yj | (12) |
where j=1,2,⋯,N.
Step 14: Perform modulo diffusion to each column to obtain image F as,
Fj=mod(Ej+Zj+Fj−1,256) | (13) |
where j=1,2,⋯,N. F0 is a constant.
Step 15: Connect the last column of the image F with the first column of F and perform modulo diffusion in the column direction again to obtain the cipher image G as,
G1=mod(F1+Z1+FN,256) | (14) |
Gj=mod(Fj+Zj+Gj−1,256) | (15) |
where j=2,3,⋯,N.
The receiver has a cipher image G, public parameters c1,c2,c3,r,β, and R, and private key (d,n). Figure 2 is the decryption flowchart of the proposed algorithm. The specific steps of decryption are as follows:
Step 1: Use the private key (d,n) to decrypt the public parameters ai=cdimodn.
Step 2: Read the cipher image G with size M×N.
Step 3: Calculate the initial value x0=(c1+a1)/(3c1+5a1), y0=(c2+a2)/(3c2+5a2), z0=(c3+a3)/(3c3+5a3).
Step 4: Update the initial values x0′=mod(x0+R1,1), y0′=mod(y0+R1,1), z0′=mod(z0+R1,1), where R1=(R+1)/(255×M×N+1).
Step 5: By iterating quantum logistic map, and discarding the first 500 values of the sequence, obtain the chaotic sequence x′,y′,z′.
Step 6: Use Eq (5) to process the sequence and get X′,Y′,Z′.
Step 7: Calculate the two control parameters ma′ and mb′ of the Arnold map using Eqs (6) and (7).
Step 8: Use images G and Z′ to perform the inverse modulo operation of the corresponding columns to derive image F′ as,
Fj′=mod(Gj−Gj−1−Zj′,256) | (16) |
F1′=mod(G1−Z1′−FN′,256) | (17) |
where j=2,3,⋯,N.
Step 9: Use image F′ to perform the inverse modulo operation of the corresponding columns to derive image E′ as,
Ej′=mod(Fj′−Fj−1′−Zj′,256) | (18) |
where j=1,2,⋯,N. F′0 is a constant.
Step 10: Use images E′ and Y′ to perform the XOR diffusion operation of the corresponding column to derive image D′ as,
Dj′=Ej′⊕Yj′ | (19) |
where j=1,2,⋯,N
Step 11: The row direction is similar to the column direction. Use Z′ to perform the inverse modulo diffusion operation in the row direction, and then use X′ to perform the XOR diffusion of the corresponding rows to derive image A′.
Step 12: According to the parameter values ma′ and mb′, use Eq (4) to perform the inverse operation of the Arnold map and obtain the plain image P′.
Grayscale and color images (some from the USC-SIPI database) are taken for testing. Windows 10 operating system is used with an AMD Ryzen 7 1700 8-core processor and 8 GB memory, and the simulations are performed on MATLAB R2017b. Table 1 shows the values of each parameter in our test. Among them, a1,a2,a3,q,p and d are the private keys, as well as e,r,β,c1,c2 and c3 are the public keys. Figures 3 and 4 present the test images and their corresponding cipher images, respectively. So, no useful information about the plain image can be seen from these cipher images. Figure 5 shows the corresponding correct decrypted images. So, the proposed cryptographic scheme can be applied to both grayscale and color images. Table 2 shows the time required to encrypt images of different sizes. As we see that our scheme can be implemented by a fast way.
Parameter | Value | Parameter | Value |
q | 1733 | a2 | 15 |
p | 1697 | a3 | 20 |
e | 163 | r | 3.99 |
a1 | 7 | β | 7 |
d | 2,757,259 | c1 | 2,855,219 |
c2 | 164,340 | c3 | 128,682 |
Image size | Initial value generation | Confusion-diffusion encryption | Total time |
256 × 256 | 0.014931 | 0.337695 | 0.394836 |
512 × 512 | 0.059334 | 0.699589 | 0.735226 |
Histogram analysis [44,45] shows how pixels are distributed in an image by plotting the number of observations for each brightness level. The frequency distribution of pixel values implies the statistical correlation between the plain images and the cipher images. A good image encryption system should have the ability to hide correlations; that is, the frequency distribution of the cipher on the pixel value is uniform, and the attacker cannot infer the plain information from it. To verify the uniformity of the pixel distribution of the proposed encryption algorithm, Figure 6 (a)–(c) and (d)–(f) show the histograms of the grayscale and encrypted images, respectively. Figure 7 is the histogram of the Baboon color image with three channels. To further evaluate the uniformity of the histogram, the statistical chi-square test was also performed, which is defined as,
χ2=255∑L=0(oL−eL)2eL | (20) |
where L is the intensity level, oL and eL are the observation reference and expected reference of the L gray level in the cipher image, respectively. The results of evaluating the uniformity of cipher images based on the chi-square values are shown in Table 3. Table 4 shows the chi-square comparison results. The smaller the chi-square value, the more uniform the pixel distribution and the higher the security. The histogram of the cipher image is evenly distributed, and the chi-square value is much smaller than the value of the plain image, which effectively improves resistivity against statistical attacks.
Image | Plain-image | Cipher-image | Results |
Goldhill | 161621.1816 | 279.9395 | Pass |
Sailboat | 179772.6055 | 240.8535 | Pass |
Peppers (Grayscale) | 138836.1738 | 287.2168 | Pass |
Sun | 319180.5827 | 273.1582 | Pass |
Baboon | 101863.4615 | 266.8301 | Pass |
Peppers (Color) | 340999.4414 | 246.8555 | Pass |
Reference | Baboon | ||
R | G | B | |
This Paper | 227.05 | 214.01 | 254.08 |
Ref. [46] | 287.56 | 227.89 | 259.78 |
Another measurement of statistical analyses is correlation [47,48,49,50]. For a natural digital image, there is a strong correlation between adjacent pixels in the horizontal, vertical, and diagonal directions. The lower correlation of adjacent pixels in a cipher image, the better performance of an encryption algorithm. A good cryptographic scheme should eliminate this correlation in a quantitative way to ensure security. The correlation coefficient is defined as
Rx′y′=cov(x′,y′)√D(x′)√D(y′) | (21) |
cov(x′,y′)=1NN∑i=1(x′i−E(x′))(y′i−E(y′)) | (22) |
E(x′)=1NN∑i=1x′i | (23) |
D(x′)=1NN∑i=1(x′i−E(x′))2 | (24) |
where Rx′y′ represents the correlation coefficient, x′ and y′ are the gray values of two adjacent pixels, and N is the total logarithm. Figure 8 shows the correlation of three directions of the grayscale image sailboat. Tables 5 and 6 show the correlation coefficient values of the test images. Table 7 shows the correlation coefficient comparisons of Baboon. The data in the tables show that the correlation coefficient of the plain images is close to 1, which means that the correlation coefficient between adjacent pixels is very strong. By using the proposed scheme, the values become close to 0, which means that our scheme can eliminate the strong correlation.
Image | Plain-image | Cipher-image | ||||
Horizontal | Vertical | Diagonal | Horizontal | Vertical | Diagonal | |
Goldhill | 0.9752 | 0.9708 | 0.9524 | -0.0151 | 0.0209 | 0.0078 |
Sailboat | 0.9721 | 0.9743 | 0.9602 | 0.0154 | 0.0106 | 0.0075 |
Peppers | 0.9833 | 0.9796 | 0.9684 | 0.0139 | 0.0054 | 0.0153 |
Image | Direction | Plain-image | Cipher-image | ||||
R | G | B | R | G | B | ||
Sun | Horizontal | 0.9561 | 0.9504 | 0.9584 | 0.0049 | -0.0041 | 0.0025 |
Vertical | 0.9553 | 0.9473 | 0.9569 | 0.0018 | 0.0102 | 0.0110 | |
Diagonal | 0.9338 | 0.9258 | 0.9359 | -0.0181 | 0.0029 | -0.0087 | |
Peppers | Horizontal | 0.9660 | 0.9811 | 0.9661 | 0.0092 | -0.0054 | 0.0103 |
Vertical | 0.9656 | 0.9822 | 0.9669 | 0.0059 | 0.0140 | 0.0118 | |
Diagonal | 0.9584 | 0.9630 | 0.9489 | -0.0093 | 0.0030 | 0.0092 | |
Baboon | Horizontal | 0.8620 | 0.7559 | 0.8838 | -0.0033 | 0.0228 | -0.0047 |
Vertical | 0.9230 | 0.8658 | 0.9104 | 0.0046 | 0.0063 | -0.0045 | |
Diagonal | 0.8536 | 0.7359 | 0.8428 | 0.0140 | 0.0050 | 0.0104 |
Method | Direction | Cipher-image | ||
R | G | B | ||
Ref. [49] | Horizontal | -0.0174 | -0.0048 | 0.0086 |
Vertical | -0.0021 | -0.0020 | 0.0727 | |
Diagonal | 0.0182 | -0.0096 | -0.0073 | |
Ours | Horizontal | 0.0092 | -0.0054 | 0.0103 |
Vertical | 0.0059 | 0.0140 | 0.0118 | |
Diagonal | -0.0093 | 0.0030 | 0.0092 |
In information theory, entropy is an important index to measure the degree of randomness of a message. Ideally, each pixel of an 8-bit cipher image has a theory entropy value of 8. The higher the information entropy value, the more uniform of gray value distribution and the more random of an image. The calculation formula of information entropy is,
H(x)=−∑Ni=0p(xi)log2p(xi) | (25) |
where p(xi) is the probability of the occurrence of xi, and N is the total number of xi. Tables 8 and 9 show the information entropy tests for different images. These results tell us that the information entropy values of the cipher image are very close to 8, indicating that the encryption scheme has strong randomness.
Image | Goldhill | Sailboat | Peppers |
Plain-image | 7.47778 | 7.48452 | 7.57148 |
Cipher-image | 7.99923 | 7.99934 | 7.99921 |
Image | Baboon | Peppers | ||||
R | G | B | R | G | B | |
Plain-image | 7.70667 | 7.47443 | 7.75222 | 7.338832 | 7.496255 | 7.05831 |
Cipher-image | 7.999377 | 7.99941 | 7.99927 | 7.99934 | 7.99924 | 7.99932 |
Usually, an image has high data redundancy; therefore, its pixels have a high correlation with neighboring pixels. For a secure cipher image, the pixel values should be evenly distributed to achieve high randomness and high security. Local information entropy is another qualitative criterion for evaluating the randomness of an image, which is defined as,
¯H(k,TB)(Si)=k∑i=1H(Si)k | (26) |
where Si represents the optional k groups of pixels in the image, and TB represents the number of pixels in Si. The local information entropy values of the grayscale and color images are tested and shown in Tables 10 and 11, respectively. Based on these results, it can be seen that the local information entropy of the cipher image has surpassed 7.95, indicating that the distribution of pixel values inside the image is very uniform and random.
Image | Goldhill | Sailboat | Peppers |
Plain-local | 6.48739 | 6.47318 | 6.55437 |
Cipher-local | 7.95391 | 7.95486 | 7.95317 |
Image | Baboon | Peppers | ||||
R | G | B | R | G | B | |
Plain-local | 6.75219 | 7.04211 | 7.00261 | 6.35622 | 6.45065 | 6.30729 |
Cipher-local | 7.95617 | 7.95727 | 7.95342 | 7.95686 | 7.95521 | 7.95294 |
The ideal property of a good encryption method should be sensitive to any small change in the plain image. That is, when the plain image has a small change in any pixel, the difference of the cipher image is analyzed to evaluate the diffusion performance of the encryption algorithm and should have the ability to resist differential attacks. The number of pixel change rate (NPCR) and unified average changing intensity (UACI) are two standards used for testing. The formulas are,
D(i,j)={0,if C1(i,j)=C2(i,j)1,if C1(i,j)≠C2(i,j) | (27) |
NPCR(C1,C2)=M∑i=1N∑j=1D(i,j)M×N×100% | (28) |
UACI(C1,C2)=M∑i=1N∑j=1|C1(i,j)−C2(i,j)|M×N×255×100% | (29) |
where C1 is one cipher image, C2 is another cipher image with one pixel in the same plain image changes. The theory values for NPCR and UACI are 99.6093 and 33.4635% respectively. Tables 12 and 13 present the average values of NPCR and UACI for grayscale and color images, respectively. Table 14 lists the comparisons by testing image Lena. All these test results show that the proposed asymmetric image encryption scheme has the ability to resist differential attacks.
Image | NPCR | UACI |
Goldhill | 99.6124 | 33.4522 |
Sailboat | 99.6129 | 33.4302 |
Peppers | 99.6086 | 33.4398 |
Image | Sun | Baboon | Peppers | ||||||
R | G | B | R | G | B | R | G | B | |
NPCR | 99.6134 | 99.6107 | 99.5951 | 99.6089 | 99.5975 | 99.6017 | 99.6010 | 99.6126 | 99.6092 |
UACI | 33.4784 | 33.4314 | 33.4631 | 33.4457 | 33.4622 | 33.4176 | 33.4744 | 33.4806 | 33.4139 |
Method | NPCR | UACI | Image size |
Ours | 99.6136 | 33.4643 | 512 × 512 |
Ours | 99.6078 | 33.3123 | 256 × 256 |
Ref. [44] | 99.7904 | 33.4970 | 512 × 512 |
Ref. [45] | 99.6033 | 28.6797 | 512 × 512 |
Ref. [46] | 99.5911 | 33.4208 | 256 × 256 |
An extremely high key sensitivity can guarantee the security of an encryption system against the brute force attacks. To evaluate the sensitivity of keys, the 512×512 image Sailboat is used as an example for testing. Figure 9 shows the key sensitivity analysis results. Moreover, Figure 9(d) shows that even if a small key change occurs, the cipher image experiences a big difference. These test results show that only the correct key can decrypt the image, and the image encryption algorithm is highly sensitive to the keys and has the ability to resist brute force attacks.
The asymmetric image encryption algorithm proposed in this paper is suitable for grayscale and color images. Taking color image as an example, Table 15 shows the information entropy comparisons with other image encryption algorithms. The values in the table express that the information entropy result of the proposed scheme in this paper is closer to 8, indicating that the gray value distribution in the proposed asymmetric encryption scheme is more uniform and random than that of other algorithms.
Image | size | Method | Information entropy | ||
R | G | B | |||
Peppers | 512 × 512 | Ours | 7.9993 | 7.9992 | 7.9993 |
256 × 256 | Ours | 7.9987 | 7.9984 | 7.9987 | |
256 × 256 | Ref. [6] | 7.9979 | 7.9979 | 7.9979 | |
512 × 512 | Ref. [14] | 7.9991 | 7.9992 | 7.9993 | |
256 × 256 | Ref. [47] | 7.9986 | 7.9987 | 7.9985 | |
256 × 256 | Ref. [48] | 7.9911 | 7.9912 | 7.9915 | |
256 × 256 | Ref. [49] | 7.9962 | 7.9929 | 7.9725 | |
Baboon | 512 × 512 | Ours | 7.9994 | 7.9994 | 7.9993 |
256 × 256 | Ours | 7.9981 | 7.9982 | 7.9979 | |
256 × 256 | Ref. [48] | 7.9914 | 7.9915 | 7.9915 | |
256 × 256 | Ref. [49] | 7.9923 | 7.9803 | 7.9986 |
This study employed a chaotic quantum logistic map, combining with both scrambling and diffusion operations, to propose a new asymmetric image encryption algorithm. First, the Arnold map was used to scramble the pixel positions of the plain images to achieve information hiding in the first layer. In the diffusion stage, different from the conventional point-to-point diffusion method, our solution took each row and each column as different units to perform diffusion operation. As to the row direction, the data in each row are first XOR-diffused. Then, each row in the image and the corresponding row in the keystream matrix are modulated and diffused; that is, two cyclic diffusions are realized by connecting the start and end. Operations to the column direction use a similar process to obtain the cipher image. Among them, the initial values of the quantum logistic map are related to the plain image, which can resist the known plaintext attack and chosen plaintext attack. Experimental tests and analyses show that the new asymmetric image encryption scheme proposed in this paper is suitable for both grayscale and color images, can better distribute pixel values be uniform, reduce high correlation, is highly sensitive to keys, and has the ability to resist various attacks.
However, there is still some disadvantages, for example, the compression operation was not considered in our scheme. So, in the future work, image can be compressed to reduce data redundancy, and how to achieve a good balance between the security and the complexity of image reconstruction should be taken into consideration. In addition, fast implement of encryption scheme is also an important issue in the future research.
The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their valuable comments and the editor's helpful suggestions. This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.61972103), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China (No.2019A1515011361), and the Key Scientific Research Project of Education Department of Guangdong Province of China (No.2020ZDZX3064).
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
[1] |
Megharaj M, Ramakrishnan B, Venkateswarlu K, et al. (2011) Bioremediation approaches for organic pollutants: A critical perspective. Environ Int 37: 1362–1375. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.06.003
![]() |
[2] |
Bezza FA, Nkhalambayausi Chirwa EM (2016) Biosurfactant-enhanced bioremediation of aged polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in creosote contaminated soil. Chemosphere 144: 635–644. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.08.027
![]() |
[3] |
de la Cueva SC, Rodríguez CH, Cruz NOS, et al. (2016) Changes in Bacterial Populations During Bioremediation of Soil Contaminated with Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Water Air Soil Poll 227: 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s11270-015-2689-7
![]() |
[4] | Dadrasnia A, Shahsavari N, Salmah I (2015) The top 101 cited articles in environmental clean-up: Oil spill remediation. Global NEST J 17: 692–700. |
[5] | Chirwa E, Smit H (2010) Simultaneous Cr (VI) reduction and phenol degradation in a trickle bed bioreactor: shock loading response. Chem Eng Trans 20: 55–60. |
[6] |
Dixit R, Malaviya D, Pandiyan K, et al. (2015) Bioremediation of heavy metals from soil and aquatic environment: an overview of principles and criteria of fundamental processes. Sustainability 7: 2189–2212. doi: 10.3390/su7022189
![]() |
[7] | Bustamante M, Durán N, Diez M (2012) Biosurfactants are useful tools for the bioremediation of contaminated soil: a review. J Soil Sci Plant Nut 12: 667–687. |
[8] |
Abdel-Moghny T, Mohamed RS, El-Sayed E, et al. (2012) Removing of hydrocarbon contaminated soil via air flushing enhanced by surfactant. Appl Petrochem Res 2: 51–59. doi: 10.1007/s13203-012-0008-4
![]() |
[9] |
Dadrasnia A, Ismail S (2015) Biosurfactant Production by Bacillus salmalaya for Lubricating Oil Solubilization and Biodegradation. Int J Environ Res Pub Heal 12: 9848. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120809848
![]() |
[10] | Santos DK, Brandão YB, Rufino RD, et al. (2014) Optimization of cultural conditions for biosurfactant production from Candida lipolytica. Biocat Agr Biotechnol 3: 48–57. |
[11] |
Dyke MIV, Couture P, Brauer M, et al. (1993) Pseudomonas aeruginosa UG2 rhamnolipid biosurfactants: structural characterization and their use in removing hydrophobic compounds from soil. Can J Microbiol 39: 1071–1078. doi: 10.1139/m93-162
![]() |
[12] |
Lima ÁS, Alegre RM (2009) Evaluation of emulsifier stability of biosurfactant produced by Saccharomyces lipolytica CCT-0913. Braz Arch Biol Tech 52: 285–290. doi: 10.1590/S1516-89132009000200004
![]() |
[13] | Nwachi AC, Onochie CC, Iroha IR, et al. (2016) Extraction of Biosurfactants Produced from Bacteria Isolated from Waste-Oil Contaminated Soil in Abakaliki Metropolis, Ebonyi State. J Biotechnol Res 2: 24–30. |
[14] | Walter V, Syldatk C, Hausmann R (2013) Screening Concepts for the Isolation of Biosurfactant Producing Microorganisms. In: Madame Curie Bioscience Database [Internet]. Austin (TX): Landes Bioscience; 2000–2013. |
[15] |
Cortés-Sánchez AdJ, Hernández-Sánchez H, Jaramillo-Flores ME (2013) Biological activity of glycolipids produced by microorganisms: New trends and possible therapeutic alternatives. Microbiol Res 168: 22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2012.07.002
![]() |
[16] |
Vijayakumar S, Saravanan V (2015) Biosurfactants-Types, Sources and Applications. Res J Microbiol 10: 181. doi: 10.3923/jm.2015.181.192
![]() |
[17] | Neu TR (1996) Significance of bacterial surface-active compounds in interaction of bacteria with interfaces. Microbiol Rev 60: 151–166. |
[18] |
Rosenberg E, Ron E (1999) High-and low-molecular-mass microbial surfactants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 52: 154–162. doi: 10.1007/s002530051502
![]() |
[19] | Perfumo A, Smyth TJP, Marchant R, et al. (2010) Production and roles of biosurfactants and bioemulsifiers in accessing hydrophobic substrates. In: Kenneth N. Timmis (ed.), Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology, Springer. UK. 2, 1501–1512. |
[20] | Mulligan CN, Gibbs BF (1990) Recovery of biosurfactants by ultrafiltration. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 47: 23–29. |
[21] |
Whang L-M, Liu P-WG, Ma C-C, et al. (2008) Application of biosurfactants, rhamnolipid, and surfactin, for enhanced biodegradation of diesel-contaminated water and soil. J Hazard Mater 151: 155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.05.063
![]() |
[22] |
Souza EC, Vessoni-Penna TC, de Souza Oliveira RP (2014) Biosurfactant-enhanced hydrocarbon bioremediation: An overview. Int Biodeter Biodeg 89: 88–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2014.01.007
![]() |
[23] | Uzoigwe C, Burgess JG, Ennis CJ, et al. (2015) Bioemulsifiers are not biosurfactants and require different screening approaches. Front Microbiol 6: 245. |
[24] | Dadrasnia A, Usman MM, Wei KSC, et al. (2016) Native soil bacterial isolate in Malaysia exhibit promising supplements on degrading organic pollutants. Process Saf Environ 100: 264–271. |
[25] |
Rahman PK, Gakpe E (2008) Production, characterisation and applications of biosurfactants-Review. Biotech 7: 360–370 doi: 10.3923/biotech.2008.360.370
![]() |
[26] | Karanth N, Deo P, Veenanadig N (1999) Microbial production of biosurfactants and their importance. Curr Sci 77: 116–126. |
[27] | Sáenz-Marta CI, de Lourdes Ballinas-Casarrubias M, Rivera-Chavira BE, et al. (2015) Biosurfactants as Useful Tools in Bioremediation. Advances in Bioremediation of Wastewater and Polluted Soil: INTECH. DOI: 10.5772/60751 |
[28] | Muthusamy K, Gopalakrishnan S, Ravi TK, et al. (2008) Biosurfactants: Properties, commercial production and application. Curr Sci (00113891) 94. |
[29] |
Gautam K, Tyagi V (2006) Microbial surfactants: a review. J Oleo Sci 55: 155–166. doi: 10.5650/jos.55.155
![]() |
[30] | Rosenberg E, Ron EZ (2013) Biosurfactants. The Prokaryotes: Springer. pp. 281–294. |
[31] |
Silva RdCFS, Almeida DG, Rufino RD, et al. (2014) Applications of Biosurfactants in the Petroleum Industry and the Remediation of Oil Spills. Int J Mol Sci 15: 12523–12542. doi: 10.3390/ijms150712523
![]() |
[32] | Kosaric N (2008) Biosurfactants. Biotechnology Set: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH. pp. 659–717. |
[33] | Cooper DG, Paddock DA (1983) Torulopsis petrophilum and Surface Activity. Appl Environ Microbiol 46: 1426–1429. |
[34] |
Thavasi R, Subramanyam Nambaru VRM, Jayalakshmi S, et al. (2011) Biosurfactant Production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Renewable Resources. Indian J Microbiol 51: 30–36. doi: 10.1007/s12088-011-0076-7
![]() |
[35] |
Duvnjak Z, Cooper DG, Kosaric N (1982) Production of surfactant by Arthrobacter paraffineus ATCC 19558. Biotechnol Bioeng 24: 165–175. doi: 10.1002/bit.260240114
![]() |
[36] |
Müller MM, Hörmann B, Kugel M, et al. (2011) Evaluation of rhamnolipid production capacity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 in comparison to the rhamnolipid over-producer strains DSM 7108 and DSM 2874. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 89: 585–592. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2901-z
![]() |
[37] |
Hewald S, Josephs K, Bölker M (2005) Genetic analysis of biosurfactant production in Ustilago maydis. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 3033–3040. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.6.3033-3040.2005
![]() |
[38] | Cooper DG, Paddock DA (1984) Production of a Biosurfactant from Torulopsis bombicola. Appl Environ Microbiol 47: 173–176. |
[39] | Matvyeyeva OL, Vasylchenko, Aliiev§Ñ OR (2014) Microbial Biosurfactants Role in Oil Products Biodegradation. Int J Environ Bioremediat Biodegradat 2: 69–74. |
[40] |
Pacwa-Płociniczak M, Płaza GA, Piotrowska-Seget Z, et al. (2011) Environmental Applications of Biosurfactants: Recent Advances. Intl J Mol Sci 12: 633–654. doi: 10.3390/ijms12010633
![]() |
[41] |
Cameotra SS, Singh P (2009) Synthesis of rhamnolipid biosurfactant and mode of hexadecane uptake by Pseudomonas species. Microb Cell Fact 8: 1–7. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-8-1
![]() |
[42] | Berg G, Seech AG, Lee H, et al. (1990) Identification and characterization of a soil bacterium with extracellular emulsifying activity. J Environ Sci Heal A 25: 753–764. |
[43] | Sen R (2010) Biosurfactants: Springer New York. 331 p. |
[44] |
Franzetti A, Gandolfi I, Bestetti G, et al. (2010) Production and applications of trehalose lipid biosurfactants. Eur J Lipid Sci Tech 112: 617–627. doi: 10.1002/ejlt.200900162
![]() |
[45] | Chen Y-G, Wang Y-X, Zhang Y-Q, et al. (2009) Nocardiopsis litoralis sp. nov., a halophilic marine actinomycete isolated from a sea anemone. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59: 2708–2713. |
[46] |
Bennur T, Kumar AR, Zinjarde S, et al. (2015) Nocardiopsis species: Incidence, ecological roles and adaptations. Microbiol Res 174: 33–47. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2015.03.010
![]() |
[47] | Jennema GE, McInerney MJ, Knapp R, M., , et al. (1983) A halotolerant, biosurfactants-producing Bacillus species potentially useful for enhanced oil recovery. Dev Ind Microbiol 24: 485–492. |
[48] | Cirigliano MC, Carman GM (1985) Purification and Characterization of Liposan, a Bioemulsifier from Candida lipolytica. Appl Environ Microbiol 50: 846–850. |
[49] | Cameron DR, Cooper DG, Neufeld RJ (1988) The mannoprotein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is an effective bioemulsifier. Appl Environ Microbiol 54: 1420–1425. |
[50] |
Appanna VD, Finn H, St Pierre M (1995) Exocellular phosphatidylethanolamine production and multiple-metal tolerance in Pseudomonas fluorescens. FEMS Microbiol Lett 131: 53–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1995.tb07753.x
![]() |
[51] |
Silva RdCFS, Almeida DG, Rufino RD, et al. (2014) Applications of Biosurfactants in the Petroleum Industry and the Remediation of Oil Spills. Intl J Mol Sci 15: 12523–12542. doi: 10.3390/ijms150712523
![]() |
[52] | Reis RS, Pacheco GJ, Pereira AG, et al. (2013) Biosurfactants: Production and Applications, Biodegradation - Life of Science, Dr. Rolando Chamy (Ed.), InTech, DOI: 10.5772/56144. |
[53] | Banat IM, Satpute SK, Cameotra SS, et al. (2014) Cost effective technologies and renewable substrates for biosurfactants’ production. Front Microbiol 5: 697. |
[54] |
Banat IM (1995) Biosurfactants production and possible uses in microbial enhanced oil recovery and oil pollution remediation: A review. Bioresource Technol 51: 1–12. doi: 10.1016/0960-8524(94)00101-6
![]() |
[55] |
Banat IM (1995) Characterization of biosurfactants and their use in pollution removal – State of the Art. (Review). Acta Biotechnologica 15: 251–267. doi: 10.1002/abio.370150302
![]() |
[56] | McInerney MJ, Han SO, Maudgalya S, et al. (2003) Development of More Effective Biosurfactants for Enhanced Oil Recovery. U.S. Department of Energy, Tulsa, Oklahoma. DOE/BC/15113e2. Available online at: http://www.netl.doe.gov/KMD/cds/disk44/I-Microbial/BC15113_2.pdf (accessed 28.06.2016.). |
[57] | Bachmann RT, Johnson AC, Edyvean RGJ (2014) Biotechnology in the petroleum industry: An overview. Int Biodeter Biodeg 86, Part C: 225–237. |
[58] |
Mulligan CN (2005) Environmental applications for biosurfactants. Environmental Pollution 133: 183–198. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2004.06.009
![]() |
[59] |
Cameotra S, Makkar R (1998) Synthesis of biosurfactants in extreme conditions. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 50: 520–529. doi: 10.1007/s002530051329
![]() |
[60] | Rodrigues L, Banat IM, Teixeira J, et al. (2006) Biosurfactants: potential applications in medicine. J Antimicrob Chemoth 57: 609–618. |
[61] | Poremba K, Gunkel W, Lang S, et al. (1991) Marine biosurfactants, III. Toxicity testing with marine microorganisms and comparison with synthetic surfactants. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C 46: 210–216. |
[62] |
Lima TMS, Procópio LC, Brandão FD, et al. (2011) Evaluation of bacterial surfactant toxicity towards petroleum degrading microorganisms. Bioresource Technol 102: 2957–2964. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.109
![]() |
[63] | Gudiña EJ, Rodrigues AI, Teixeira JA, et al. (2015) New microbial surface-active compounds: the ultimate alternative to chemical surfactants? SINAFERM 2015 XX Simpósio Nacional de Bioprocessos. Fortaleza, Brazil, Sep. 1-4, 1-5, 2015. |
[64] | Korcan SE, Ciğerci İH, Konuk M (2013) White-Rot Fungi in Bioremediation. Fungi as Bioremediators: Springer. pp. 371–390. |
[65] |
Barr DP, Aust SD (1994) Mechanisms white rot fungi use to degrade pollutants. Environ Sci Technol 28: 78A–87A. doi: 10.1021/es00051a724
![]() |
[66] | Parmar B, Mervana P, Vyas B (2015) Degradation of textile dyes by white rot basidiomycetes. Lifesci Leaflet 59: 62–75. |
[67] | Cookson J (1995) Bioremediation engineering: design and application: McGraw Hill, New York. |
[68] |
Peng X, Yuan X-z, Liu H, et al. (2015) Degradation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) by Laccase in Rhamnolipid Reversed Micellar System. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 176: 45–55. doi: 10.1007/s12010-015-1508-3
![]() |
[69] |
Liu Z-F, Zeng G-M, Zhong H, et al. (2012) Effect of dirhamnolipid on the removal of phenol catalyzed by laccase in aqueous solution. World J Microbiol Biot 28: 175–181. doi: 10.1007/s11274-011-0806-3
![]() |
[70] |
Shin K-H, Kim K-W, Ahn Y (2006) Use of biosurfactant to remediate phenanthrene-contaminated soil by the combined solubilization–biodegradation process. J Hazard Mater 137: 1831–1837. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.05.025
![]() |
[71] |
Santos D, Rufino R, Luna J, et al. (2016) Biosurfactants: Multifunctional Biomolecules of the 21st Century. Intl J Mol Sci 17: 401. doi: 10.3390/ijms17030401
![]() |
[72] | Wuana RA, Okieimen FE (2011) Heavy Metals in Contaminated Soils: A Review of Sources, Chemistry, Risks and Best Available Strategies for Remediation. ISRN Ecology 2011: 20. |
[73] |
Miller RM (1995) Biosurfactant-facilitated remediation of metal-contaminated soils. Environ Health Persp 103: 59–62. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s459
![]() |
[74] |
Babich H, Stotzky G (1983) Temperature, pH, salinity, hardness, and particulates mediate nickel toxicity to eubacteria, an actinomycete, and yeasts in lake, simulated estuarine, and sea waters. Aquat Toxicol 3: 195–208. doi: 10.1016/0166-445X(83)90040-1
![]() |
[75] |
Babich H, Stotzky G (1982) Nickel toxicity to microbes: Influence of pH and implications for acid rain. Environ Res 29: 335–350. doi: 10.1016/0013-9351(82)90035-4
![]() |
[76] |
Sandrin TR, Maier RM (2002) Effect of pH on cadmium toxicity, speciation, and accumulation during naphthalene biodegradation. Environ Toxicol Chem 21: 2075–2079. doi: 10.1002/etc.5620211010
![]() |
[77] |
Olaniran AO, Balgobind A, Pillay B (2013) Bioavailability of Heavy Metals in Soil: Impact on Microbial Biodegradation of Organic Compounds and Possible Improvement Strategies. Intl J Mol Sci 14: 10197–10228. doi: 10.3390/ijms140510197
![]() |
[78] |
Batista S, Mounteer A, Amorim F, et al. (2006) Isolation and characterization of biosurfactant/bioemulsifier-producing bacteria from petroleum contaminated sites. Bioresource Technol 97: 868–875. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.04.020
![]() |
[79] |
Liu B, Liu J, Ju M, et al. (2016) Purification and characterization of biosurfactant produced by Bacillus licheniformis Y-1 and its application in remediation of petroleum contaminated soil. Mar Pollut Bull 107: 46–51. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.04.025
![]() |
[80] |
Yan P, Lu M, Yang Q, et al. (2012) Oil recovery from refinery oily sludge using a rhamnolipid biosurfactant-producing Pseudomonas. Bioresource Technol 116: 24–28. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.024
![]() |
[81] |
Liu W, Wang X, Wu L, et al. (2012) Isolation, identification and characterization of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BZ-6, a bacterial isolate for enhancing oil recovery from oily sludge. Chemosphere 87: 1105–1110. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.01.059
![]() |
[82] |
Zhou W, Wang X, Chen C, et al. (2013) Enhanced soil washing of phenanthrene by a plant-derived natural biosurfactant, Sapindus saponin. Colloid Surface A 425: 122–128. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.02.055
![]() |
[83] |
Lau EV, Gan S, Ng HK, et al. (2014) Extraction agents for the removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from soil in soil washing technologies. Environ Poll 184: 640–649. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.09.010
![]() |
[84] | Deziel E, Paquette G, Villemur R, et al. (1996) Biosurfactant production by a soil pseudomonas strain growing on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Appl Environ Microbiol 62: 1908–1912. |
[85] |
Mao X, Jiang R, Xiao W, et al. (2015) Use of surfactants for the remediation of contaminated soils: A review. J Hazard Mater 285: 419–435. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.009
![]() |
[86] |
Ye M, Sun M, Wan J, et al. (2015) Evaluation of enhanced soil washing process with tea saponin in a peanut oil–water solvent system for the extraction of PBDEs/PCBs/PAHs and heavy metals from an electronic waste site followed by vetiver grass phytoremediation. J Chem Technol Biot 90: 2027–2035. doi: 10.1002/jctb.4512
![]() |
1. | Xianhua Song, Guanglong Chen, Ahmed A. Abd El-Latif, Quantum Color Image Encryption Scheme Based on Geometric Transformation and Intensity Channel Diffusion, 2022, 10, 2227-7390, 3038, 10.3390/math10173038 | |
2. | Ya-jun Gao, Hong-wei Xie, Jun Zhang, Hao Zhang, A novel quantum image encryption technique based on improved controlled alternated quantum walks and hyperchaotic system, 2022, 598, 03784371, 127334, 10.1016/j.physa.2022.127334 | |
3. | Man-Wen Tian, Yassine Bouteraa, Khalid A. Alattas, Shu-Rong Yan, Abdullah K. Alanazi, Ardashir Mohammadzadeh, Saleh Mobayen, Hiroki Sayama, A Type-3 Fuzzy Approach for Stabilization and Synchronization of Chaotic Systems: Applicable for Financial and Physical Chaotic Systems, 2022, 2022, 1099-0526, 1, 10.1155/2022/8437910 | |
4. | Quanyv Wang, Xiaoqiang Zhang, Xiaohu Zhao, Image encryption algorithm based on improved Zigzag transformation and quaternary DNA coding, 2022, 70, 22142126, 103340, 10.1016/j.jisa.2022.103340 | |
5. | Abdurrahim Toktas, Ugur Erkan, Feyza Toktas, Zeki Yetgin, Chaotic Map Optimization for Image Encryption Using Triple Objective Differential Evolution Algorithm, 2021, 9, 2169-3536, 127814, 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3111691 | |
6. | Chunmeng Li, Xiaozhong Yang, An image encryption algorithm based on discrete fractional wavelet transform and quantum chaos, 2022, 260, 00304026, 169042, 10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.169042 | |
7. | Ioannis Kafetzis, Christos Volos, 2022, Chapter 5, 978-3-031-02471-9, 85, 10.1007/978-3-031-02472-6_5 | |
8. | Xiu-Fang Feng, Shi-Xian Nan, Rui-Qing Ma, Hao Zhang, A Lossless Compression and Encryption Method for Remote Sensing Image Using LWT, Rubik’s Cube and 2D-CCM, 2022, 32, 0218-1274, 10.1142/S0218127422501498 | |
9. | Mohamed Maazouz, Abdelmoughni Toubal, Billel Bengherbia, Oussama Houhou, Noureddine Batel, FPGA implementation of a chaos-based image encryption algorithm, 2022, 34, 13191578, 9926, 10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.12.022 | |
10. | Wenzheng Ma, Tingting Yu, Zhuang Wang, Xianli Li, A novel image encryption scheme based on Logistic cosine cascade maps, 2023, 98, 0031-8949, 035225, 10.1088/1402-4896/acbba6 | |
11. | Guo-Dong Ye, Hui-Shan Wu, Xiao-Ling Huang, Syh-Yuan Tan, Asymmetric image encryption algorithm based on a new three-dimensional improved logistic chaotic map, 2023, 32, 1674-1056, 030504, 10.1088/1674-1056/ac7dbb | |
12. | B. Nagarajan, C. Ananth, N. Mohananthini, Blockchain-based smart and secured scheme for question sharing using bee colony optimization based quantum logistic map encryption, 2023, 15, 2511-2104, 2889, 10.1007/s41870-023-01333-4 | |
13. | WALAA M. ABD-ELHAFIEZ, MAHMOUD ABDEL-ATY, XIAO-JUN YANG, AWATEF BALOBAID, AN IMAGE ENCRYPTION TECHNIQUE BASED ON DISCRETE WAVELET TRANSFORM AND FRACTIONAL CHAOTIC CRYPTOVIROLOGY, 2024, 32, 0218-348X, 10.1142/S0218348X23401242 | |
14. | Jinwen He, Hegui Zhu, Xv Zhou, Quantum image encryption algorithm via optimized quantum circuit and parity bit-plane permutation, 2024, 81, 22142126, 103698, 10.1016/j.jisa.2024.103698 | |
15. | Mohamed Yamni, Achraf Daoui, Paweł Pławiak, Osama Alfarraj, Ahmed A. Abd El-Latif, A Hardware-Accelerated Approach to Chaotic Image Encryption: LTB Map and FPGA Implementation, 2024, 12, 2169-3536, 103921, 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3432008 | |
16. | Jianrong Li, Zhiqiang Xu, Pengyu Han, Huiying Sun, Ting Ke, Wei Chen, Chuanlei Zhang, 2024, Chapter 27, 978-981-97-5602-5, 331, 10.1007/978-981-97-5603-2_27 | |
17. | Zahraa A. Ali, Tayseer S. Atia, Ahmed Y. Yousuf, Ahmed J. Khahdim, A comprehensive review of quantum image encryption methods: design characteristics, cryptographic properties, and AI integration, 2024, 23, 1573-1332, 10.1007/s11128-024-04563-y | |
18. | Furkan Ciylan, Bünyamin Ciylan, Mehmet Atak, FPGA-Based Chaotic Image Encryption Using Systolic Arrays, 2023, 12, 2079-9292, 2729, 10.3390/electronics12122729 | |
19. | Rashad Ali, Muhammad Kamran Jamil, Amal S. Alali, Javed Ali, Gulraiz Afzal, A Robust S Box Design Using Cyclic Groups and Image Encryption, 2023, 11, 2169-3536, 135880, 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3337443 | |
20. | R. Amutha, 2024, Image Encryption Using Chaotic Map, 979-8-3503-5082-1, 1223, 10.1109/TENCON61640.2024.10902948 | |
21. | Biswarup Yogi, Ajoy Kumar Khan, Advancements in image encryption: A comprehensive review of design principles and performance metrics, 2025, 57, 15740137, 100759, 10.1016/j.cosrev.2025.100759 | |
22. | Li Huang, Cong Ding, Zhenjie Bao, Haitao Chen, Changsheng Wan, A DNA Encoding Image Encryption Algorithm Based on Chaos, 2025, 13, 2227-7390, 1330, 10.3390/math13081330 | |
23. | Mohamed Yamni, Achraf Daoui, Chakir El-Kasri, May Almousa, Ali Abdullah S. AlQahtani, Ahmed A. Abd El-Latif, Lightweight image encryption using integer reversible discrete Dual-Hahn transform on embedded systems, 2025, 69, 22150986, 102108, 10.1016/j.jestch.2025.102108 | |
24. | K. SUBHASHINI, R. AMUTHA, B. A. MOHAMMED HASHIM, Chaotic Image Encryption using Two Level Scrambling, 2025, 25, 1582-7445, 27, 10.4316/AECE.2025.02004 | |
25. | 晓瑞 金, Image Encryption Algorithm Based on HLSE Chaotic Map and Improved Zigzag Transform, 2025, 15, 2161-8801, 164, 10.12677/csa.2025.157190 |
Parameter | Value | Parameter | Value |
q | 1733 | a2 | 15 |
p | 1697 | a3 | 20 |
e | 163 | r | 3.99 |
a1 | 7 | β | 7 |
d | 2,757,259 | c1 | 2,855,219 |
c2 | 164,340 | c3 | 128,682 |
Image size | Initial value generation | Confusion-diffusion encryption | Total time |
256 × 256 | 0.014931 | 0.337695 | 0.394836 |
512 × 512 | 0.059334 | 0.699589 | 0.735226 |
Image | Plain-image | Cipher-image | Results |
Goldhill | 161621.1816 | 279.9395 | Pass |
Sailboat | 179772.6055 | 240.8535 | Pass |
Peppers (Grayscale) | 138836.1738 | 287.2168 | Pass |
Sun | 319180.5827 | 273.1582 | Pass |
Baboon | 101863.4615 | 266.8301 | Pass |
Peppers (Color) | 340999.4414 | 246.8555 | Pass |
Reference | Baboon | ||
R | G | B | |
This Paper | 227.05 | 214.01 | 254.08 |
Ref. [46] | 287.56 | 227.89 | 259.78 |
Image | Plain-image | Cipher-image | ||||
Horizontal | Vertical | Diagonal | Horizontal | Vertical | Diagonal | |
Goldhill | 0.9752 | 0.9708 | 0.9524 | -0.0151 | 0.0209 | 0.0078 |
Sailboat | 0.9721 | 0.9743 | 0.9602 | 0.0154 | 0.0106 | 0.0075 |
Peppers | 0.9833 | 0.9796 | 0.9684 | 0.0139 | 0.0054 | 0.0153 |
Image | Direction | Plain-image | Cipher-image | ||||
R | G | B | R | G | B | ||
Sun | Horizontal | 0.9561 | 0.9504 | 0.9584 | 0.0049 | -0.0041 | 0.0025 |
Vertical | 0.9553 | 0.9473 | 0.9569 | 0.0018 | 0.0102 | 0.0110 | |
Diagonal | 0.9338 | 0.9258 | 0.9359 | -0.0181 | 0.0029 | -0.0087 | |
Peppers | Horizontal | 0.9660 | 0.9811 | 0.9661 | 0.0092 | -0.0054 | 0.0103 |
Vertical | 0.9656 | 0.9822 | 0.9669 | 0.0059 | 0.0140 | 0.0118 | |
Diagonal | 0.9584 | 0.9630 | 0.9489 | -0.0093 | 0.0030 | 0.0092 | |
Baboon | Horizontal | 0.8620 | 0.7559 | 0.8838 | -0.0033 | 0.0228 | -0.0047 |
Vertical | 0.9230 | 0.8658 | 0.9104 | 0.0046 | 0.0063 | -0.0045 | |
Diagonal | 0.8536 | 0.7359 | 0.8428 | 0.0140 | 0.0050 | 0.0104 |
Method | Direction | Cipher-image | ||
R | G | B | ||
Ref. [49] | Horizontal | -0.0174 | -0.0048 | 0.0086 |
Vertical | -0.0021 | -0.0020 | 0.0727 | |
Diagonal | 0.0182 | -0.0096 | -0.0073 | |
Ours | Horizontal | 0.0092 | -0.0054 | 0.0103 |
Vertical | 0.0059 | 0.0140 | 0.0118 | |
Diagonal | -0.0093 | 0.0030 | 0.0092 |
Image | Goldhill | Sailboat | Peppers |
Plain-image | 7.47778 | 7.48452 | 7.57148 |
Cipher-image | 7.99923 | 7.99934 | 7.99921 |
Image | Baboon | Peppers | ||||
R | G | B | R | G | B | |
Plain-image | 7.70667 | 7.47443 | 7.75222 | 7.338832 | 7.496255 | 7.05831 |
Cipher-image | 7.999377 | 7.99941 | 7.99927 | 7.99934 | 7.99924 | 7.99932 |
Image | Goldhill | Sailboat | Peppers |
Plain-local | 6.48739 | 6.47318 | 6.55437 |
Cipher-local | 7.95391 | 7.95486 | 7.95317 |
Image | Baboon | Peppers | ||||
R | G | B | R | G | B | |
Plain-local | 6.75219 | 7.04211 | 7.00261 | 6.35622 | 6.45065 | 6.30729 |
Cipher-local | 7.95617 | 7.95727 | 7.95342 | 7.95686 | 7.95521 | 7.95294 |
Image | NPCR | UACI |
Goldhill | 99.6124 | 33.4522 |
Sailboat | 99.6129 | 33.4302 |
Peppers | 99.6086 | 33.4398 |
Image | Sun | Baboon | Peppers | ||||||
R | G | B | R | G | B | R | G | B | |
NPCR | 99.6134 | 99.6107 | 99.5951 | 99.6089 | 99.5975 | 99.6017 | 99.6010 | 99.6126 | 99.6092 |
UACI | 33.4784 | 33.4314 | 33.4631 | 33.4457 | 33.4622 | 33.4176 | 33.4744 | 33.4806 | 33.4139 |
Image | size | Method | Information entropy | ||
R | G | B | |||
Peppers | 512 × 512 | Ours | 7.9993 | 7.9992 | 7.9993 |
256 × 256 | Ours | 7.9987 | 7.9984 | 7.9987 | |
256 × 256 | Ref. [6] | 7.9979 | 7.9979 | 7.9979 | |
512 × 512 | Ref. [14] | 7.9991 | 7.9992 | 7.9993 | |
256 × 256 | Ref. [47] | 7.9986 | 7.9987 | 7.9985 | |
256 × 256 | Ref. [48] | 7.9911 | 7.9912 | 7.9915 | |
256 × 256 | Ref. [49] | 7.9962 | 7.9929 | 7.9725 | |
Baboon | 512 × 512 | Ours | 7.9994 | 7.9994 | 7.9993 |
256 × 256 | Ours | 7.9981 | 7.9982 | 7.9979 | |
256 × 256 | Ref. [48] | 7.9914 | 7.9915 | 7.9915 | |
256 × 256 | Ref. [49] | 7.9923 | 7.9803 | 7.9986 |
Parameter | Value | Parameter | Value |
q | 1733 | a2 | 15 |
p | 1697 | a3 | 20 |
e | 163 | r | 3.99 |
a1 | 7 | β | 7 |
d | 2,757,259 | c1 | 2,855,219 |
c2 | 164,340 | c3 | 128,682 |
Image size | Initial value generation | Confusion-diffusion encryption | Total time |
256 × 256 | 0.014931 | 0.337695 | 0.394836 |
512 × 512 | 0.059334 | 0.699589 | 0.735226 |
Image | Plain-image | Cipher-image | Results |
Goldhill | 161621.1816 | 279.9395 | Pass |
Sailboat | 179772.6055 | 240.8535 | Pass |
Peppers (Grayscale) | 138836.1738 | 287.2168 | Pass |
Sun | 319180.5827 | 273.1582 | Pass |
Baboon | 101863.4615 | 266.8301 | Pass |
Peppers (Color) | 340999.4414 | 246.8555 | Pass |
Reference | Baboon | ||
R | G | B | |
This Paper | 227.05 | 214.01 | 254.08 |
Ref. [46] | 287.56 | 227.89 | 259.78 |
Image | Plain-image | Cipher-image | ||||
Horizontal | Vertical | Diagonal | Horizontal | Vertical | Diagonal | |
Goldhill | 0.9752 | 0.9708 | 0.9524 | -0.0151 | 0.0209 | 0.0078 |
Sailboat | 0.9721 | 0.9743 | 0.9602 | 0.0154 | 0.0106 | 0.0075 |
Peppers | 0.9833 | 0.9796 | 0.9684 | 0.0139 | 0.0054 | 0.0153 |
Image | Direction | Plain-image | Cipher-image | ||||
R | G | B | R | G | B | ||
Sun | Horizontal | 0.9561 | 0.9504 | 0.9584 | 0.0049 | -0.0041 | 0.0025 |
Vertical | 0.9553 | 0.9473 | 0.9569 | 0.0018 | 0.0102 | 0.0110 | |
Diagonal | 0.9338 | 0.9258 | 0.9359 | -0.0181 | 0.0029 | -0.0087 | |
Peppers | Horizontal | 0.9660 | 0.9811 | 0.9661 | 0.0092 | -0.0054 | 0.0103 |
Vertical | 0.9656 | 0.9822 | 0.9669 | 0.0059 | 0.0140 | 0.0118 | |
Diagonal | 0.9584 | 0.9630 | 0.9489 | -0.0093 | 0.0030 | 0.0092 | |
Baboon | Horizontal | 0.8620 | 0.7559 | 0.8838 | -0.0033 | 0.0228 | -0.0047 |
Vertical | 0.9230 | 0.8658 | 0.9104 | 0.0046 | 0.0063 | -0.0045 | |
Diagonal | 0.8536 | 0.7359 | 0.8428 | 0.0140 | 0.0050 | 0.0104 |
Method | Direction | Cipher-image | ||
R | G | B | ||
Ref. [49] | Horizontal | -0.0174 | -0.0048 | 0.0086 |
Vertical | -0.0021 | -0.0020 | 0.0727 | |
Diagonal | 0.0182 | -0.0096 | -0.0073 | |
Ours | Horizontal | 0.0092 | -0.0054 | 0.0103 |
Vertical | 0.0059 | 0.0140 | 0.0118 | |
Diagonal | -0.0093 | 0.0030 | 0.0092 |
Image | Goldhill | Sailboat | Peppers |
Plain-image | 7.47778 | 7.48452 | 7.57148 |
Cipher-image | 7.99923 | 7.99934 | 7.99921 |
Image | Baboon | Peppers | ||||
R | G | B | R | G | B | |
Plain-image | 7.70667 | 7.47443 | 7.75222 | 7.338832 | 7.496255 | 7.05831 |
Cipher-image | 7.999377 | 7.99941 | 7.99927 | 7.99934 | 7.99924 | 7.99932 |
Image | Goldhill | Sailboat | Peppers |
Plain-local | 6.48739 | 6.47318 | 6.55437 |
Cipher-local | 7.95391 | 7.95486 | 7.95317 |
Image | Baboon | Peppers | ||||
R | G | B | R | G | B | |
Plain-local | 6.75219 | 7.04211 | 7.00261 | 6.35622 | 6.45065 | 6.30729 |
Cipher-local | 7.95617 | 7.95727 | 7.95342 | 7.95686 | 7.95521 | 7.95294 |
Image | NPCR | UACI |
Goldhill | 99.6124 | 33.4522 |
Sailboat | 99.6129 | 33.4302 |
Peppers | 99.6086 | 33.4398 |
Image | Sun | Baboon | Peppers | ||||||
R | G | B | R | G | B | R | G | B | |
NPCR | 99.6134 | 99.6107 | 99.5951 | 99.6089 | 99.5975 | 99.6017 | 99.6010 | 99.6126 | 99.6092 |
UACI | 33.4784 | 33.4314 | 33.4631 | 33.4457 | 33.4622 | 33.4176 | 33.4744 | 33.4806 | 33.4139 |
Method | NPCR | UACI | Image size |
Ours | 99.6136 | 33.4643 | 512 × 512 |
Ours | 99.6078 | 33.3123 | 256 × 256 |
Ref. [44] | 99.7904 | 33.4970 | 512 × 512 |
Ref. [45] | 99.6033 | 28.6797 | 512 × 512 |
Ref. [46] | 99.5911 | 33.4208 | 256 × 256 |
Image | size | Method | Information entropy | ||
R | G | B | |||
Peppers | 512 × 512 | Ours | 7.9993 | 7.9992 | 7.9993 |
256 × 256 | Ours | 7.9987 | 7.9984 | 7.9987 | |
256 × 256 | Ref. [6] | 7.9979 | 7.9979 | 7.9979 | |
512 × 512 | Ref. [14] | 7.9991 | 7.9992 | 7.9993 | |
256 × 256 | Ref. [47] | 7.9986 | 7.9987 | 7.9985 | |
256 × 256 | Ref. [48] | 7.9911 | 7.9912 | 7.9915 | |
256 × 256 | Ref. [49] | 7.9962 | 7.9929 | 7.9725 | |
Baboon | 512 × 512 | Ours | 7.9994 | 7.9994 | 7.9993 |
256 × 256 | Ours | 7.9981 | 7.9982 | 7.9979 | |
256 × 256 | Ref. [48] | 7.9914 | 7.9915 | 7.9915 | |
256 × 256 | Ref. [49] | 7.9923 | 7.9803 | 7.9986 |