Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Economic crisis as a consequence COVID-19 virus attack: risk and damage assessment

Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 32, Nakhimovsky prospekt, Moscow, 117218, Russian Federation

Special Issues: Special Issue on the Economic and Financial Impact of “COVID-19”

The purpose of the research is to reveal the mechanism of influence of coronavirus on the economic crisis and to develop a method for assessing threats and risks. Understanding the mechanism of generating an economic crisis allows to develop methods of anti-crisis government policy. The research methodology is based on structural analysis and taxonomic approach. Their application makes it possible to distinguish activities with decreasing demand relative to initial supply, and with increasing demand, which generates deficits of goods. The results of the research at the theoretical level of analysis is the proposed method of assessing threats and risks from the spread of coronavirus, which allows the benefits of certain types of activities (pharmaceuticals and medicine), and consider the damage on other activities (tourism, transportation, education). The diagram of the ratio of benefits and losses from the spread of the virus attack allows to position different economies in different zones of the diagram, according to the reaction of a particular economy to the epidemic, with a different scale of influence. Using such a chart, estimating the expected damage and expected benefits, the impact of COVID-19 on the economy is assessed based on changes in the dynamics of investments in financial and non-financial assets. Analysis of financial and non-financial investments in some countries has led to the conclusion that the financial system that is less biased in terms of financial investment relative to the functioning of non-financial sectors is the least vulnerable in a crisis. The multiple excess of financial investments over non-financial ones for Russia creates the foundation of financial instability and recession. This is confirmed using econometric analysis and forecast. Therefore, overcoming the economic crisis caused by COVID-19 in addition to the current measures will require correcting, in particular, the structure of “financial-non-financial” investments.
  Article Metrics


1. Alonso-Carrera J, Raurich X (2018) Labor mobility, structural change and economic growth. J Macroecon 56: 292-310.    

2. Beutels P, Jia N, Zhou QY, et al. (2009) The economic impact of SARS in Beijing, China. Trop Med Int Health 14: 85-91.    

3. Brancaccio E, Garbellini N, Giammetti R (2018) Structural labour market reforms, GDP growth and the functional distribution of income. Struct Change Econ Dyn 44: 34-45.    

4. Chambers J, Barker K, Rouse A (2012) Reflections on the UK's approach to the 2009 swine flu pandemic: conflicts between national government and the local management of the public health response. Health Place 18: 737-745.    

5. Cutrini E (2019) Economic integration, structural change, and uneven development in the European Union. Struct Change Econ Dyn 50: 102-113.    

6. Freire C (2019) Economic diversification: A model of structural economic dynamics and endogenous technological change. Struct Change Econ Dyn 49: 13-28.    

7. Guerard JB, Markowitz H, Xu G (2015) Earnings forecasting in a global stock selection model and efficient portfolio construction and management. Int J Forecasting 31: 550-560.    

8. Gates B (2020) Responding to COVID-19-a once in-a-century pandemic? New Engl J Med.

9. Iamsiraroj S (2016) The foreign direct investment-economic growth nexus. Int Rev Econ Financ 42: 116-133.    

10. Landesmann MA, Stöllinge R (2019) Structural change, trade and global production networks: An 'appropriate industrial policy' for peripheral and catching-up economies. Struct Change Econ Dyn 48: 7-23.    

11. Nicoll A, Ammon A, Amato A, et al. (2010) Experience and lessons from surveillance and studies of the 2009 pandemic in Europe. Public Health 124: 14-23.    

12. Nkeki CI (2018) Optimal investment risks and debt management with backup security in a financial crisis. J Comput Appl Math 338: 129-152.    

13. Pasquini-Descomps H, Brender N, Maradan D (2017) Value for money in H1N1 influenza: a systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of pandemic interventions. Value Health 20: 819-827.    

14. Samaniego RM, Sun JY (2016) Productivity growth and structural transformation. Rev Econ Dyn 21: 266-285.    

15. Singhal T (2020) A Review of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). Indian J Pediatrics, 281-286.

16. Sukharev OS (2020) Structural analysis of income and risk dynamics in models of economic growth. Quant Financ Econ 4: 1-18    

17. Sukharev OS (2019) The restructuring of the investment portfolio: the risk and effect of the emergence of new combinations. Quant Financ Econ 3: 390-411.    

18. Zhao S, Chen H (2020) Modeling the epidemic dynamics and control of COVID-19 outbreak in China. Quant Biology.

19. Vu KM (2017) Structural change and economic growth: Empirical evidence and policy insights from Asian economies. Struct Change Econ Dyn 41: 64-77.    

20. Xie B, He D, Mercer T, et al. (2020) Global health crises are also information crises: A call to action. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol.

21. Yu KDS, Aviso KB (2020) Modelling the Economic Impact and Ripple Effects of Disease Outbreaks. Process Integration Optim Sustainability.

© 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved