Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of Federal Reserve monetary policies over time in the U.S.: an exploratory empirical assessment

Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Jacksonville University, Jacksonville, USA

Special Issues: Uncertainty and Monetary Policy

In the present study, we empirically investigate the uncertainty of the effectiveness of recent monetary policies in lowering the real mortgage rate in the U.S. In particular, we have an eye towards determining whether the Fed’s policies have been consistently effective or whether, instead, there is uncertainty regarding whether, when, and to what extent these policies achieve their ostensible goal of lowing the mortgage rate. Based upon empirical estimates of a loanable funds model, it is shown that the consistency of recent monetary policies, as reflected in the ratios of the M2 money supply to GDP and quantitative easing to GDP, has varied considerably between the study periods 1974–2009, 1974–2010, 1974–2011, 1974–2012, 1974–2013, 1974–2014, and 1974–2015, implying that there exists uncertainty regarding how consistent monetary policy effectiveness really is. This monetary policy uncertainty is even more apparent when the periods 1974–2008 and 1974–2016 are considered. Moreover, it is observed that elevated interest rate risk is a collateral effect of recent monetary policies. Interest rate risk seriously endangers the health of the macro-economy and throws future monetary policy effectiveness even further into question and yields further economic uncertainty.
  Article Metrics

Keywords monetary policy in the U.S.; inconsistent policy outcomes; uncertain effects of monetary policy; fed funds rate; M2 money supply; quantitative easing

Citation: Richard J. Cebula, Robert Boylan. Uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of Federal Reserve monetary policies over time in the U.S.: an exploratory empirical assessment. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2019, 3(2): 244-256. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2019.2.244


  • 1.Al-Saji A (1993) Government budget deficits, nominal and ex ante real long term interest rates in the U.K., 1960.1–1990.2. Atl Econ J 21: 71–77.
  • 2. Barth JR (1991) The great savings and loan debacle, Washington, D.C.: AEI Press.
  • 3. Barth JR, Iden G, Russek FS (1985) Federal borrowing and short term interest rates: Comment. South Econ J 52: 554–559.    
  • 4. Belton W, Cebula RJ (1994) Does the Federal Reserve create political monetary cycles? J Macroecon 16: 461–479.    
  • 5. Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1979) A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica 47: 1287–1294.    
  • 6. Carlson KM, Spencer RW (1975) Crowding out and its critics. Fed Reserve Bank St Louis Rev 57: 1–19.
  • 7. Cebula RJ (1997) An empirical note on the impact of the federal budget deficit on ex ante real long-term interest rates, 1973–1995. South Econ J 63: 1094–1099.    
  • 8. Cebula RJ (2013) An exploratory inquiry into the impact of budget deficits on the nominal interest rate yield on Moody's Aaa-rated corporate bonds. Appl Econ Lett 20: 1497–1500.    
  • 9. Cebula RJ (2014) Impact of federal government budget deficits on the longer-term ex post real interest rate in the U.S.: Evidence using annual and quarterly data, 1960–2013. Appl Econ Q 60: 23–40.
  • 10. Cebula RJ, Angjellari-Dajci F, Foley M (2014) An exploratory empirical inquiry into the impact of federal budget deficits on the expost real interest rate yield on ten-year Treasury notes over the last half century. J Econ Financ 38: 712–720.    
  • 11. Choi DFS, Holmes MJ (2014) Budget deficits and real interest rates: a regime-switching reflection on Ricardian Equivalence. J Econ Financ 38: 71–83.    
  • 12. Council of Economic Advisors (2004) Economic report of the president, 2004. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • 13. Council of Economic Advisors (2018) Economic report of the president, 2018. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • 14. Ewing BT, Yanochik MA (1999) Budget deficits and the term structure of interest rates in Italy. Appl Econ Lett 6: 199–201.    
  • 15. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (2017) Economic research. Available from: https://www.fred.stlouisfed.org/.
  • 16. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (1980) "Statement by Paul Volker before the Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy of the Committee on Banking & Urban Affairs, House of Representatives".
  • 17. Findlay DW (1990) Budget deficits, expected inflation, and short-term real interest rates. Int Econ J 4: 41–53.
  • 18. Gale WG, Orszag PR (2003) Economic effects of sustained budget deficits. Nat Tax J 49: 151–164.
  • 19. Gissey W (1999) Net Treasury borrowing and interest rate changes. J Econ Financ 23: 211–219.
  • 20. Greene WH (1997) Econometric Analysis, Upper saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • 21. Grier K (1991) Congressional influence on U.S. monetary policy. J Monetary Econ 25: 201–220.
  • 22. Hoelscher G (1986) New evidence on deficits and interest rates. J Money Credit Bank 18: 1–17.    
  • 23. Johnson CF (1992) An empirical note on interest rate equations. Q Rev Econ Financ 32: 141–147.
  • 24. Keynes JM (1936) The general theory of employment, interest, and money, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • 25. Kiewiet DR (1983) Macroeconomics and micropolitics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 26. Krippner L (2012) A model for interest rates near the zero lower bound: An overview and discussion. Reserve Bank of New Zealand Working paper Series.
  • 27. Madura J (2008) Financial markets and institutions, 8th ed. Mason, OH: Thomson Higher Education.
  • 28. Marfatia HA (2014) Impact of uncertainty on high frequency response of the U.S. stock markets to the Fed's policy surprises. Q Rev Econ Financ 54: 382–392.
  • 29. Marfatia HA (2015) Monetary policy's time-varying impact on U.S. bond markets: Role of financial stress and risks. N Am Econ Financ 34: 103–123.
  • 30. Newey WK, West KD (1987) A simple positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55: 703–708.    
  • 31. Ostrosky AL (1990) Federal budget deficits and interest rates: Comment. South Econ J 56: 802–803.    
  • 32. Robinson KJ (1980) Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980. Fed Reserve Bull 66: 444–453.
  • 33. Saltz IS (1998) Exante real long-term interest rates and U.S. federal budget deficits: Preliminary error-correction evidence, 1971–1991. Econ Int 51: 163–169.
  • 34. Swamy PAVB, Kolluri BR, Singamsetti RN (1990) What do regressions of interest rates on deficits imply? South Econ J 56: 1010–1028.    
  • 35. Vargas-Silva C (2008) Monetary policy and the U.S. housing market: A VAR analysis imposing sign restrictions. J Macroecon 30: 990–997.
  • 36. Wheeler M, Chowdhury A (1993) The housing market, macroeconomic activity and financial Innovation: An empirical analysis. Appl Econ 25: 1385–1392.    
  • 37. Wu IC, Xia FD (2016) Measuring the macroeconomic impact of monetary policy at the zero lower bound. J Money Credit Bank 48: 234–248.
  • 38. Zahid K (1988) Government budget deficits and interest rates: The evidence since 1971 using alternative deficit measures. South Econ J 54: 725–731.    


Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved