
Considering the distributed time delay and the stochastic change of environment, this research primarily studied the dynamical behavior of the gamma-distributed delay SIR model driven by Lévy noise and Markov chain. First, it is proved that there is a unique global positive solution for stochastic model. Second, by constructing appropriate stochastic Lyapunov functions that account for regime switching, we derive a sufficient condition, Rs>1, indicating the existence of a stationary distribution. This suggests the disease will persist over a long period. Finally, numerical simulations confirm the theoretical findings.
Citation: Jing Yang, Shaojuan Ma, Dongmei Wei. Dynamical analysis of SIR model with Gamma distribution delay driven by Lévy noise and switching[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(5): 3158-3176. doi: 10.3934/era.2025138
[1] | Meng Gao, Xiaohui Ai . A stochastic Gilpin-Ayala nonautonomous competition model driven by mean-reverting OU process with finite Markov chain and Lévy jumps. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(3): 1873-1900. doi: 10.3934/era.2024086 |
[2] | Jia Chen, Yuming Chen, Qimin Zhang . Ergodic stationary distribution and extinction of stochastic pertussis model with immune and Markov switching. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(5): 2736-2761. doi: 10.3934/era.2025121 |
[3] | Hui Cao, Mengmeng Han, Yunxiao Bai, Suxia Zhang . Hopf bifurcation of the age-structured SIRS model with the varying population sizes. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(10): 3811-3824. doi: 10.3934/era.2022194 |
[4] | Nafeisha Tuerxun, Zhidong Teng . Optimal harvesting strategy of a stochastic $ n $-species marine food chain model driven by Lévy noises. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(9): 5207-5225. doi: 10.3934/era.2023265 |
[5] | Miaomiao Gao, Yanhui Jiang, Daqing Jiang . Threshold dynamics of a stochastic SIRS epidemic model with transfer from infected individuals to susceptible individuals and log-normal Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(5): 3037-3064. doi: 10.3934/era.2025133 |
[6] | Wenjie Zuo, Mingguang Shao . Stationary distribution, extinction and density function for a stochastic HIV model with a Hill-type infection rate and distributed delay. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(11): 4066-4085. doi: 10.3934/era.2022206 |
[7] | Sida Lin, Jinlong Yuan, Zichao Liu, Tao Zhou, An Li, Chuanye Gu, Kuikui Gao, Jun Xie . Distributionally robust parameter estimation for nonlinear fed-batch switched time-delay system with moment constraints of uncertain measured output data. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(10): 5889-5913. doi: 10.3934/era.2024272 |
[8] | Hankang Ji, Yuanyuan Li, Xueying Ding, Jianquan Lu . Stability analysis of Boolean networks with Markov jump disturbances and their application in apoptosis networks. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(9): 3422-3434. doi: 10.3934/era.2022174 |
[9] | Wenjie Wang, Suzhen Wen, Shen Gao, Pengyi Lin . A multi-objective dynamic vehicle routing optimization for fresh product distribution: A case study of Shenzhen. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(4): 2897-2920. doi: 10.3934/era.2024132 |
[10] | Yifan Wu, Xiaohui Ai . Analysis of a stochastic Leslie-Gower predator-prey system with Beddington-DeAngelis and Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(1): 370-385. doi: 10.3934/era.2024018 |
Considering the distributed time delay and the stochastic change of environment, this research primarily studied the dynamical behavior of the gamma-distributed delay SIR model driven by Lévy noise and Markov chain. First, it is proved that there is a unique global positive solution for stochastic model. Second, by constructing appropriate stochastic Lyapunov functions that account for regime switching, we derive a sufficient condition, Rs>1, indicating the existence of a stationary distribution. This suggests the disease will persist over a long period. Finally, numerical simulations confirm the theoretical findings.
As everyone knows, epidemics have a significant impact on socioeconomic conditions and human health, such as tuberculosis, measles, pertussis, and so on. Infectious diseases have great transmission power. If they are not effectively controlled, the epidemic will spread rapidly anywhere [1,2]. Mathematical models are typically employed in epidemiology to depict the transmission dynamics of diseases. Since Kermack and McKendrick introduced the SIR model to describe the spread of infectious diseases in [3], the SIR model considering the time delay has been widely adopted in the studies of epidemics [4,5,6,7]. Zaman et al. [8] developed the time-delayed SIR epidemic model incorporating control strategies to optimize the combined population of susceptible and recovered individuals. Kudryashov et al. [9] examined the SIR model for the propagation of coronavirus and investigated the analytical solutions of the model in conjunction with epidemiological data. Kumar et al. [10] analyzed the SIR model with time delay and determined the global stability of the disease-free equilibrium. To effectively regulate the dynamics of susceptible, infected, and recovered populations under time-varying vaccination control, the SEIR model with distributed delay was developed in [11]. This model utilizes a feedback mechanism to achieve this regulation. Krylova et al. [12] discussed the SIR model and found that when the average infection period is fixed, the transmission dynamics will change with the change of the distribution shape of the infection period. Many biological processes, especially disease transmission, involve the complexity of delays, so introducing the delays into epidemic models to characterize the delay of the infection state. For vector-borne diseases, the distributed time delay needs to be further considered.
Numerous research have found that environmental noise significantly influences the transmission of infectious diseases [13,14,15,16]. Ji et al. [17] presented the SIR model with stochastic disturbances and found that in the case of low noise intensity, there is a threshold that determines whether the epidemic will die out or persist. The SIS model of disease transmission coefficient and mortality subject to stochastic disturbance was analyzed in [18], which obtained sufficient conditions for thestochastic SIS model to have a unique ergodic stationary distribution. Du NH and Nhu NN [19] introduced the stochastic SIR model in which both natural mortality and morbidity were disturbed by white noise, which obtained sufficient and necessary conditions for the extinction and persistence of SIR. The global dynamic characteristics of the epidemic model and its corresponding stochastic differential equations were studied in [20], which found that the stochastic fluctuations could suppress the outbreak of disease. Li and co-authors [21] investigated the stochastic tumor immune model of integrated pulse therapy, which showed that the tumor status lasted from weak to disappeared as the noise intensity gradually increased. Dieu et al. [22] investigated the asymptotic behavior of a class of stochastic SIR models with degenerate diffusion, providing sufficient conditions approximating permanence.
The epidemic model may also be subjected to stochastic and some environmental disturbances, such as volcanic eruption, bird flu, tsunami, etc. These environmental factors will cause the mutation of the population size, which cannot be described by white noise. The introduction of Lévy noise into epidemic models by some researchers aims to more accurately reflect the impact of discontinuous, sudden environmental changes found in nature [23,24,25,26]. Zhou et al. [27] discussed the SIR model with Lévy noise disturbances and adopted an innovative approach to derive sufficient and almost necessary conditions for disease extinction and persistence. The stochastic SIR model with multidimensional Lévy noise is discussed in [28], which shows that persistence and disappearance depend not only on the variance of the process increment but also on the shape of its distribution. The dynamical behavior of the predation model driven by Lévy noise is discussed in [29], proving the existence and uniqueness of the understanding. Li et al. [30] analyzed the asymptotic behavior of the stochastic SIR model at its equilibrium point, comparing it to a deterministic SIR model.
In addition to Lévy noise, infectious diseases are also affected by color noise during the transmission process, causing the system to switch between different environmental states. Telegraph noise can be interpreted as a switch between two or more different states, such as temperature, seasonal turnover, or rainfall, among others [31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. For example, the stochastic SIR epidemic models with state switching are discussed, and Markov semigroup theory is used to prove the existence of stationary distributions in [31]. Continuous-time Markov chains are used to describe the state-switching behavior of the environment [33,34]. On this basis, Sereno et al. [37] proposed a switching nonlinear model predictive control strategy for SIR models to optimize non-drug interventions.
As mentioned above, numerous researchers have explored stochastic SIR epidemic models with time delays. Unfortunately, few researchers have considered introducing both Lévy noise and Markov switching into SIR epidemic models with distributed delays, which are more realistic than other models. However, this makes it challenging for us to theoretically analyze the asymptotic behavior of disease transmission. Hence, the primary contributions of this research are manifested in the following aspects:
∙ Based on [4,38], this paper describes the latency characteristics by introducing Gamma distributed delay, describes sudden environmental changes combined with Lévy noise, and adds Markov switching mechanism to reflect the dynamic changes of the environment. This multi-factor integrated modeling method improves the authenticity and reliability of the model.
∙ Inspired by Liu et al. [39], we construct a stochastic Lyapunov function tailored for regime switching, which allows us to prove the model possesses a unique stationary distribution. Applying this approach, we can analyze the long-term behavior of infectious diseases by uncovering the complex dynamics of disease persistence and the inherent weak stability of stochastic systems.
∙ Through theoretical analysis and numerical simulations, we explore the influence of environmental noise on disease transmission dynamics. Special attention is given to the probability density distribution of different compartments, analyzing their relationship with Markov switching and uncovering the internal mechanisms of disease spread under stochastic environments.
The paper proceeds as follows. Section 2 introduces the construction of the model. Section 3 establishes the existence of a unique global positive solution for any initial value. Section 4 derives the stationary distribution for the time-delay stochastic model. Section 5 presents numerical simulations verifying the theoretical results. The paper concludes with final remarks and future research directions.
The SIR epidemic model with distributed delay, as presented in [4], is formulated as follows:
{dS=[Λ−μS(t)−βS(t)∫t−∞I(τ)F(t−τ)dτ]dt,dI=[βS(t)∫t−∞I(τ)F(t−τ)dτ−(μ+γ+ε)I(t)]dt,dR=[γI(t)−μR(t)]dt, | (2.1) |
where Λ is the birth rate, μ is the death rate, γ represents the recovery rate, ε represents the mortality rate caused by disease, β is the rate of conversion from the susceptible to the infected state. In reality, the incubation period and infection period of the disease are usually not fixed values, but fluctuate within a certain range. The use of Gamma distribution delay can describe this variability well and can more accurately reflect the memory effect and time dependence of disease transmission. For instance, the quantity of infected persons is reliant upon not just the immediate transmission status but also the long-term impact of infection events. Thus, utilizing a Gamma distribution for the kernel delay F(⋅) offers a practical approach. That is F(τ)=τnρn+1e−ρτn!,τ>0. ρ is the rate parameter of the gamma distribution, controlling the scale of the distribution and ρ>0. In this study, we consider the weak kernel n=1, we set Z(t)=∫t−∞ρe−ρ(t−τ)I(τ)dτ, model (2.1) is converted as follows:
{dS=[Λ−μS(t)−βS(t)Z(t)]dt,dI=[βS(t)Z(t)−(μ+γ+ε)I(t)]dt,dR=[γI(t)−μR(t)]dt,dZ=ρ(I(t)−Z(t))dt, | (2.2) |
model (2.2) has the corresponding basic reproduction number and the invariant attracting set, which are given by R0=βΛμ(μ+γ+ε) and ℘0={(S,I,R,Z)|S≥0,I≥0,R≥0,Z≥0,S+I+R+Z≤Λμ}. Moreover, two potential equilibrium states are described as follows:
∙ If R0≤1, the disease-free equilibrium E0=(Λμ,0,0,0), then E0 is globally asymptotically stable in ℘0, indicating that the disease will be eliminated from the population.
∙ If R0>1, the endemic equilibrium E+=(S+,I+,R+,Z+), where S+=μ+γ+εβ, I+=βΛ−μ(μ+γ+ε)(μ+γ+ε)β, R+=γ(βΛ−μ(μ+γ+ε))βμ(μ+γ+ε), Z+=I+, then E+ is globally asymptotically stable, but E0 is unstable in the domain ℘0. This suggests that the disease will continue to be prevalent for an extended period.
Inspired by the above discussion, this paper introduces the stochastic change factor to the environment, constructs the SIR epidemic system model with Lévy noise and Markov switching mechanism. The introduction of Lévy noise is used to capture the large stochastic disturbance that may occur in the real society; it is described by a Markov chain, the instantaneous dynamics of life rate switching between two or more different infectious environmental conditions, so as to build a more comprehensive and accurate disease transmission model. Based on the characteristics of Markov chains, for any finite state space n∈N, we construct the following switched hybrid model
{dS=[Λ(n)−μ(n)S(t)−β(n)S(t)Z(t)]dt+σ1(n)S(t)dB1(t)+∫Yr1(n,u)S(t)˜N(dt,du),dI=[β(n)S(t)Z(t)−(μ(n)+γ(n)+ε(n))I(t)]dt+σ2(n)I(t)dB2(t)+∫Yr2(n,u)I(t)˜N(dt,du),dR=[γ(n)I(t)−μ(n)R(t)]dt+σ3(n)R(t)dB3(t)+∫Yr3(n,u)R(t)˜N(dt,du),dZ=ρ(n)(I(t)−Z(t))dt, | (2.3) |
where Bi(t)(i=1,2,3) are mutually independent standard Brownian motions, σi2>0(i=1,2,3) represents white noises. This paper proposes the following hypotheses:
Assumption(A1): σi2(⋅)>0(i=1,2,3) represent white noises. The process η(t) is an irreducible and continuous-time Markov chain defined on the state space N={1,2,3,...,k}, η(t) is assumed to be generated by the transition rate matrix (μij)k×k, so
P{η(τ+Δτ)=j|η(τ)=i}={μijΔτ+o(Δτ),i≠j,1+μiiΔτ+o(Δτ),i=j, |
where μij>0 denotes the transition rate from state i to j and i≠j, μii=−∑ki≠j,i=1μii. Based on the irreducibility property of η(t), there exists a unique stationary probability distribution ϕ=(ϕ1,ϕ2,...,ϕk)∈ℜ1×k subject to ∑kn=1ϕn=1 and ϕn>0 (n∈N). It is also assumed that η(t) and Bi(t)(i=1,2,3) are independent.
Assumption(A2): r(u) is a bounded function 1+r(u)>0 and |Λμr(u)|≤δ<1,u∈Y.
Assumption(A3): If the above assumptions are satisfied, there exists ˜χ(t,n)=(S(t),I(t),R(t),Z(t),n)T∈R+4×N has limt→∞supE|˜χ(t,n)|n≤Q(φ).
To investigate the dynamical behavior of the infectious disease model, the initial focus is on determining whether its solutions are globally positive. We will demonstrate that model (2.3) possesses a unique global positive solution for any initial condition, employing the technique of constructing a stochastic Lyapunov function.
Theorem 1. For any given initial value (S(0),I(0),R(0),Z(0),n)∈R+4×N, there exists a unique solution (S,I,R,Z) for the model (2.3) on t ≥ 0, and the solution will remain in R+4 with probability one, namely, the solution (S(t),I(t),R(t),Z(t),n)∈R+4×N for all t ≥ 0 almost surely (a.s.).
Proof: Since the coefficients of model (2.3) satisfy the local Lipschitz condition, then for model (2.3) with initial value (S(0),I(0),R(0),Z(0),n)∈R+4×N, there exists a unique local solution(S(t),I(t),R(t),Z(t),n) on t∈[0,τe), where τe is an explosion time. To prove the local solution is global, we only need to prove τe=∞ a.s.. Assume that k0 is so large that (S(0),I(0),R(0),Z(0),n)∈[1k0,k0]. For each integer k>k0, define the stopping time as follows:
τk=inf{t∈[0,τe):min{(S(t),I(t),R(t),Z(t))}≤1kormax{(S(t),I(t),R(t),Z(t))}≥k}, |
where infϕ=∞(ϕistheemptyset). τk is increasing as k→∞. Assume that τ∞=limk→∞τk and τ∞≤τe a.s.. We need to prove that τ∞=∞ a.s., then τe=∞ a.s.. Otherwise, there exist the constants T>0 and δ∈(0,1) such that P(τ∞≤T)≥δ. Hence there exist the integers k1≥k0, which take
P{τk≤T}≥δ,∀k>k1. | (3.1) |
Define a fundamental function V: R+4→R+
V(S,I,R,Z)=(S−a−alnSa)+(I−1−lnI)+(R−1−lnR)+(Z−b−lnZb). |
We have the following inequality to get V(S,I,R,Z) is non-negative
g−1−lng≥0,∀g>0. |
By applying Itˆo′s formula
dV=LVdt+σ1(n)(S−a)dB1(t)+σ2(n)(I−1)dB2(t)+σ3(n)(R−1)dB3(t)+∫Y[ar1(n,u)−aln(1+r1(n,u)(u))]˜N(dt,du)+∫Y[r2(n,u)−ln(1+r2(n,u))]˜N(dt,du)+∫Y[r3(n,u)−ln(1+r3(n,u))]˜N(dt,du), |
where
LV=(1−aS)[Λ(n)−μ(n)S−β(n)SZ]+(1−1I)[β(n)SZ−(μ(n)+γ(n)+ε(n))I]+(1−1R)[γ(n)I−μ(n)R]+(1−bZ)[ρ(n)(I−Z)]+12(aσ12(n)S2S2+σ22(n)I2I2+σ32(n)R2R2)+∫Y[r1(n,u)−aln(1+r1(n,u))]vdu+∫Y[r2(n,u)−ln(1+r2(n,u))]vdu+∫Y[r3(n,u)−ln(1+r3(n,u))]vdu |
=Λ(n)−μ(n)S−β(n)SZ−Λ(n)aS+aβ(n)Z+aμ(n)+β(n)SZ−(μ(n)+γ(n)+ε(n))I−β(n)SZI+μ(n)+γ(n)+ε(n)+γ(n)I−μ(n)R−γ(n)IR+μ(n)+ρ(n)(I−Z)−bZρ(n)(I−Z)+12(aσ12(n)+σ22(n)+σ32(n))+∫Y[r1(u,n)−aln(1+r1(u,n))]vdu+∫Y[r2(u,n)−ln(1+r2(u,n))]vdu+∫Y[r3(u,n)−ln(1+r3(u,n))]vdu≤Λ(n)+2μ(n)+γ(n)+ε(n)+μ(n)a+(aβ(n)−ρ(n))Z+(bρ(n)−(μ(n)+γ(n)+ε(n)))I+b+12(σ12(n)+σ22(n)+σ32(n))+∫Y[r1(n,u)−aln(1+r1(n,u))]vdu+∫Y[r2(n,u)−ln(1+r2(n,u))]vdu+∫Y[r3(n,u)−ln(1+r3(n,u))]vdu:=Λ(n)+2μ(n)+γ(n)+ε(n)+μ(n)a+b+12(aσ12(n)+σ22(n)+σ32(n))+H1+H2+H3, |
choosing a=βρ,b=μ+γ+ερ. which H1=−∫Y[ln(1−r1(n,u))−r1(n,u)]vdu,H2=−∫Y[ln(1−r2(n,u))−r2(n,u)]vdu, H3=−∫Y[ln(1−r3(n,u))−r3(n,u)]vdu. From Taylor's formula and hypothesis A2, we can get:
H1=−[ln(1−r1(n,u))−r1(n,u)]=r12(n,u)2(1−θr1(n,u))2≤δ22(1−δ)2, |
where θ∈(0,1) is an arbitrary constant, H2 and H3, so on.
LV(S,I,R,Z)≤Λ(n)+2μ(n)+γ(n)+ε(n)+μ(n)a+b+12(aσ12(n)+σ22(n)+σ32(n))+3δ22(1−δ)2λ(Y):=˜K, |
where ˜K >0, therefore we can obtain
dV(S,I,R,Z)≤˜Kdt+σ1(n)(S−a)dB1(t)+σ2(n)(I−1)dB2(t)+σ3(n)(R−1)dB3(t)+∫Y[r1(n,u)a−aln(1+r1(n,u))(u)]˜N(dt,du)+∫Y[r2(n,u)−ln(1+r2(n,u))]˜N(dt,du)+∫Y[r3(n,u)−ln(1+r3)(n,u)]˜N(dt,du). | (3.2) |
Integrate both sides of Eq (3.2) from 0 to τk∧T and draw the expectation then
EV(S(τk∧T),I(τk∧T),R(τk∧T),Z(τk∧T))≤V(S(0),I(0),R(0),Z(0))+˜KE(τk∧T)≤V(S(0),I(0),R(0),Z(0))+˜KT. | (3.3) |
Let Ωk={τk≤T}, for w∈Ωξ and in view of Eq (3.2), we obtain P(Ωk)≥ε such that for each w∈Ωξ, S(τk,ω) or I(τk,ω) or R(τk,ω) or Z(τk,ω) equals either k or 1k, so
V(S(τk,ω),I(τk,ω),R(τk,ω),Z(τk,ω))≥(k−a−alnka)∧(1k−a+aln(ka))∧(k−1−lnk)∧(1k−1+lnk)∧(k−b−blnkb)∧(1k−b+bln(kb)). |
From Eq (3.2), we can obtain
V(S(0),I(0),R(0),Z(0))+˜KT≥E[IΩk(ω)∨(S(τk,ω),I(τk,ω),R(τk,ω),Z(τk,ω))]≥δ[(k−a−alnka)∧(1k−a+aln(ka))∧(k−1−lnk)∧(1k−1+lnk)∧(k−b−blnkb)∧(1k−b+bln(kb))]. |
where 1Ωk is the indicative function of Ωk, let k→∞, then
∞>V(S(0),I(0),R(0),Z(0))+˜KT=∞. |
Thus τ∞=∞ holds almost everywhere. Consequently, Theorem 1 is verified.
Remark 1. In a biological sense, the population of each compartment cannot be negative. For the established model (2.3) to have practical biological significance, it is necessary to prove the existence and uniqueness of a global positive solution.
Next, we prove the existence of an ergodic stationary distribution of model (2.3). To facilitate this, we begin by presenting the following symbols and lemma.
Rs=β(n)Λ(n)[μ(n)+ς1+12∑kn=1ϕnσ12(n)][μ(n)+γ(n)+ε(n)+ς2+12∑kn=1ϕnσ22(n)], |
∫Y(ri(u)−ln(1+ri(u)))vdu=ςi<∞(i=1,2). |
Lemma 4.1. [38,40]For a bounded open domain ⋃∈R4 with regular boundary ∂⋃, the following statement is valid
(i) There exists a positive constant K such that for all x∈∪,ξ∈R4, 4∑i,j=1aij(x)ξiξj≥K|ξ|2.
(ii) There is a non-negative C2 function u(t) such that Lu(t)<0 for any R4∖∪.
Then Markov process χ(t) is characterized by a unique ergodic stationary distribution, which is represented by ∏(⋅).
Theorem 2. For any initial value (S(0),I(0),R(0),Z(0),n)∈R+4×N, the presence of Rs>1 guarantees that a unique ergodic stationary distribution is present in ∈R+4×N.
Proof: The model (2.3) has the following diffusion matrix
[σ1(n)χ1ς1,σ2(n)χ2ς2,σ3(n)χ3ς3][σ1(n)χ1ς1σ2(n)χ2ς2σ3(n)χ3ς3]=(σ1(n)χ)21ς12+(σ2(n)χ)22ς22+(σ3(n)χ)23ς32≥min{(σ1(n)χ)2,(σ2(n)χ)2,(σ3(n)χ)2}‖ς‖. | (4.1) |
From this we can get that condition (i) of Lemma 4.1 is fulfilled. To confirm Lemma 4.1 criterion (ii), we introduce the function u1(t) as follows:
u1(t)=−m1lnS(t)−m2lnI(t)−m3lnZ(t)+→ω(n), |
where m1=1,m2=ρ(n)β(n)Λ(n)ρ(n)[μ(n)+γ(n)+ε(n)+ς2+12∑kn=1ϕnσ2(n)]2,m3=ρ(n)β(n)Λ(n)ρ(n)2[μ(n)+ς1+12∑kn=1ϕnσ2(n)]2. The function →ω(n) represents a Markov process and is twice continuously differentiable. Its Itˆo′s derivative takes the following form:
L→ω(n)=k∑n=1,j=1unj(t)→ω(n). | (4.2) |
We obtain
Lu1(t)=−m1S[Λ(n)−μ(n)S−β(n)SZ]−m2I[β(n)SZ−(μ(n)+γ(n)+ε(n))I]−m3Z(ρ(n)(I−Z))+m1S2σ122S2+m1I2σ222I2+m1∫Y[r1(n,u)−ln(1+r1(n,u))]vdu+m2∫Y[r2(n,u)−ln(1+r2(n,u))]vdu+k∑n=1,j=1unj(t)→ω(n)=k∑n=1,j=1unj(t)→ω(n)−m1Λ(n)S+m1μ(n)+m1β(n)SZ−m2β(n)SZI+m2(μ(n)+γ(n)+ε(n))−m3ρ(n)IZ+m3ρ(n)+m1S2σ122S2+m2I2σ222I2+m1∫Y[r1(n,u)−ln(1+r1(n,u))]vdu+m2∫Y[r2(n,u)−ln(1+r2(n,u))]vdu |
=k∑n=1,j=1unj(t)→ω(n)−m1Λ(n)S−m2β(n)SZI−m3ρ(n)IZ+m1(μ(n)+β(n)Z+σ122)+m2(μ(n)+γ(n)+ε(n)+σ222)+m3ρ(n)+m1∫Y[r1(n,u)−ln(1+r1(n,u))]vdu+m2∫Y[r2(n,u)−ln(1+r2(n,u))]vdu≤−33√m1m2m3β(n)Λ(n)ρ(n)+m1(μ(n)+β(n)Z+σ122+ς1)+m2(μ(n)+γ(n)+ε(n)+σ222+ς2)+m3ρ+k∑n=1,j=1unj(t)→ω(n). |
Utilizing the irreducibility characteristic of the Markov process, for σ12(n)=(σ12(1),σ12(2),....,σ12(K)), there exist →ω(n)=(→ω(1),→ω(2),...→ω(K)), and →ω(n) is defined in Eq (4.2) such that
12σ12(n)=k∑n=1,j=1unj(t)→ω(n)=12∑Kn=1ϕnσ12(n). |
For σ22(n)=(σ22(1),σ22(2),....,σ22(K)), we have
12σ22(n)+k∑n=1,j=1unj(t)→ω(n)=12∑Kn=1ϕnσ22(n). |
where n∈N={1,2,3,...,K} and unj>0, then it yields
Lu1(t)≤−β(n)Λ(n)[μ(n)+γ(n)+ε(n)+ς2+12∑kn=1ϕnσ22(n)]+μ(n)+ς1+12∑kn=1ϕnσ2(n)+β(n)Z(t)≤−[μ(n)+ς1+12∑kn=1ϕnσ22(n)](Rs−1)+β(n)Z(t). |
where Rs=β(n)Λ(n)[μ(n)+ς1+12∑kn=1ϕnσ12(n)][μ(n)+γ(n)+ε(n)+ς2+12∑kn=1ϕnσ22(n)]. Then, we define u2(t),
u2(t)=S(t)+I(t)+R(t)+1S(t)+I(t)+R(t). |
By Itˆo′s formula, we obtain
Lu2(t)=Λ(n)−(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))μ(n)−ε(n)I(t)−Λ(n)−(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))μ(n)−εI(t)(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))2+σ12(n)S2(t)+σ22(n)I2(t)+σ32(n)R2(t)(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))3+∫Y[r1(n,u)S(t)+r2(n,u)I(t)+r3(n,u)R(t)(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))2]vdu+∫Y[1S(t)(1+r1(n,u))+I(t)(1+r2(n,u))+R(t)(1+r3(n,u))−1S(t)+I(t)+R(t)]vdu. |
In addition, we have
εI(t)(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))2<ε(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))2<ε(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))2, |
And then
σ12(n)S(t)+σ22(n)I(t)+σ32(n)R(t)(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))3≤(σ12(n)∨σ22(n)∨σ32(n))(S2(t)+I2(t)+R2(t))(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))3. |
Therefore, it can be inferred that
∫Y[1S(t)(1+r1(n,u))+I(t)(1+r2(n,u))+R(t)(1+r3(n,u))−1S(t)+I(t)+R(t)]vdu+∫Y[r1(u)S(t)+r2(u)I(t)+r3(u)R(t)(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))2]vdu≤∫Y[1[(1+r1(n,u))∧(1+r2(n,u))∧(1+r3(n,u))](S(t)+I(t)+R(t))]vdu+∫Y[(r1(n,u)∨r2(n,u)∨r3(n,u))(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))2]vdu=1S(t)+I(t)+R(t)∫Y[11+rmin(n,u)−1+rmax(n,u)]vdu, |
where rmin(u)={r1(n,u)∧r2(n,u)∧r3(n,u)} and rmax(u)={r1(n,u)∨r2(n,u)∨r3(n,u)}. Moreover, it can be deduced that
Lu2(t)≤−(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))μ−Λ(n)2(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))2+μ(n)+ε(n)+(σ12(n)∨σ22(n)∨σ32(n))(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))+1S(t)+I(t)+R(t)∫Y[11+rmin(n,u)−1+rmax(n,u)]vdu+Λ(n)−ε(n)I(t)≤−(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))μ−Λ2(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))2+w1−ε(n)I(t), |
where σmax2(n)={σ12(n)∨σ22(n)∨σ32(n)} and w1=12(S(t)+I(t)+R(t)){μ(n)+ε(n)+σmax2(n)+∫Y[11+rmin(n,u)−1+rmax(n,u)]vdu}+Λ(n). Then, we define u3(t)
u3(t)=R(t)+1R(t)+Z(t)+1Z(t). |
Using Itˆo′s formula, we have
Lu3(t)=ε(n)I(t)−μ(n)R(t)−ε(n)I(t)−μ(n)R(t)R2(t)−σ32(n)R(t)R2(t)+ρ(n)(I(t)−Z(t))−ρ(n)(I(t)−Z(t))Z2(t)+1R(t)∫Y[11+r3(n,u)−1+r3(n,u)]vdu≤ε(n)I(t)−μ(n)R(t)−ε(n)I(t)−μ(n)R(t)R2(t)+ρ(n)I(t)−ρ(n)Z(t)−ρ(n)(I(t)−Q(φ))Z2(t)+1R(t)∫Y[11+r3(u)−1+r3(u)]vdu≤(ε(n)+ρ(n))I(t)−μ(n)R(t)−ε(n)I(t)−μ(n)R(t)R2(t)−ρ(n)Z(t)−ρ(n)Q(φ)2Z2(t)+ρ(n)2Q(φ)+w2, |
where w2=1R(t)∫Y[11+r3(n,u)−1+r3(n,u)]vdu. Finally, u(t) is defined
u(t)=ε(n)ρ(n)2β(n)(ε(n)+ρ(n))u1(t)+u2(t)+ε(n)(ε(n)+ρ(n))u3(t), |
The function u(t) is continuous. When u(t)→∞, there is a lower value u∗(S∗,I∗,R∗,Z∗) at point of (S∗,I∗,R∗,Z∗) formulate a nonnegative function.
˜u(t)=u(t)−u∗(S∗,I∗,R∗,Z∗), |
if assumption (A3) holds, it can be obtained
L˜u(t)≤ε(n)ρ(n)2β(n)(ε(n)+ρ(n))[−(μ(n)+ς1+12∑kn=1ϕnσ2(n))(Rs−1)]u(t)−(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))μ(n)−Λ(n)2(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))2+w1−ε(n)I(t)+ε(n)(ε(n)+ρ(n))[(ε(n)+ρ(n))I(t)−μ(n)R(t)−ε(n)I(t)−μ(n)R(t)R2(t)−ρ(n)Z(t)−ρ(n)Q(φ)2Z2(t)+ρ(n)2Q(φ)+w2]≤−ερ(n)2β(n)(ε(n)+ρ(n))[(μ(n)+ς1+12∑kn=1ϕnσ2(n))(Rs−1)]−(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))μ(n)−Λ(n)2(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))2−ε(n)μ(n)R(t)(ε(n)+ρ(n))−ε(n)(ε(n)I(t)−μ(n)R(t))(ε(n)+ρ(n))R2(t)−ε(n)ρ(n)Z(t)(ε(n)+ρ(n))−ε(n)ρ(n)Q(φ)(ε(n)+ρ(n))2Z2(t)+ε(n)ρ(n)(ε(n)+ρ(n))2Q(φ)+ε(n)w2(ε(n)+ρ(n))+w1. |
When S(t)→0+ or I(t)→0+ or R(t)→0+ or Z(t)→0+, it gives
L˜u(t)≤−ε(n)ρ(n)2β(n)(ε(n)+ρ(n))[(μ(n)+ς1+12∑kn=1ϕnσ2(n))(Rs−1)]−Λ(n)2(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))2−ε(n)(ε(n)I(t)−μ(n)R(t))(ε(n)+ρ(n))R2(t)−ε(n)ρ(n)Q(φ)(ε(n)+ρ(n))2Z2(t)+ε(n)ρ(n)(ε(n)+ρ(n))2Q(φ)+ε(n)w2(ε(n)+ρ(n))+w1→−∞. | (4.3) |
When S(t)→+∞ or I(t)→+∞ or R(t)→+∞ or Z(t)→+∞, it gives
L˜u(t)≤−ε(n)ρ(n)2β(n)(ε(n)+ρ(n))[(μ(n)+ς1+12∑kn=1ϕnσ2(n))(Rs−1)]−(S(t)+I(t)+R(t))μ(n)−ε(n)μ(n)R(t)(ε(n)+ρ(n))−ε(n)ρ(n)Z(t)(ε(n)+ρ(n))+ε(n)ρ(n)(ε(n)+ρ(n))2Q(φ)+ε(n)w2(ε(n)+ρ(n))+w1→−∞. | (4.4) |
Based on the analysis in (4.3) and (4.4), if Rs>1, then there exist sufficiently small have L˜u(t)<−1. This satisfies the conditions stated in Lemma 4.1, thereby concluding the proof of the theorem.
Remark 2. When Rs>1, the model (2.3) has the ergodic stationary distribution, indicating that the epidemic will persist in the population. Additionally, by examining Rs and R0, it can be obtained that Rs = R0 when σ1=σ2=σ3=0. Thus, this reveals the critical impact of stochastic fluctuations on the spread of epidemics.
In this paper, we discuss the long-term behavior of a class for SIR models with distributed delays driven by Lévy noise and switching. Next, we will employ numerical simulations to validate the aforementioned theoretical findings. Define the finite state space of continuous-time Markov chain η(t) as N={1,2}, with its generator matrix Γ is
Γ=(−7373292−292). |
By solving πΓ=0, we find that the unique stationary distribution of the aforementioned Markov chain η(t) is (π1,π2)=(0.8,0.2).
The parameter values presented in Table 1 have been obtained.
Parameter | Definition | Unit | Value | Source |
Λ | The steady intake of newly susceptible individuals | day−1 | 0.33 | [40] |
μ | The rate of natural deaths within the population | day−1 | 0.006 | [40] |
γ | Rate of recovery among infected individuals | day−1 | 0.04 | [40] |
ε | Mortality rate due to the disease | day−1 | 0.06 | [40] |
β | Transmission rate | day−1 | 0.0035 | [40] |
To be reasonable, around each parameter value in Table 1, we chose the following parameter values for numerical simulations. The model with initial value (S(0),I(0),R(0))=(50,10,0.1).
State | Λ | μ | β | γ | ε | ρ | σ1 | σ2 | σ3 | r1(u) | r2(u) | r3(u) |
State 1 | 0.3 | 0.006 | 0.0023 | 0.05 | 0.019 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
State 2 | 0.4 | 0.008 | 0.0046 | 0.07 | 0.026 | 0.0006 | 0.0015 | 0.0025 | 0.0015 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.15 |
By direct calculation, we have
Rs=βΛ[μ+ς1+12∑kn=1ϕnσ12(n)][μ+γ+ε+ς2+12∑kn=1ϕnσ22(n)]>1. |
The conditions of Theorem 2 are satisfied. Theorem 2 implies the trend observed in model (2.3), a unique stationary distribution evident in Figure 2. By looking closely at the curves representing S(t), I(t), and R(t), it is clear that the disease is still present. From a biological perspective, this indicates that the disease will persist in its present state.
Figure 3 exhibits the stationary probability density (SPD) of S(t), I(t), and R(t), using the same parametric values as those in Figure 2. Figure 3 shows that the probability density functions of S(t), I(t), and R(t) are confined to a narrow interval, each exhibiting two local peaks that correspond to the two states 1, 2 of Markov chain η(t), where N={1,2}. States 1 and 2 delineate two different epochs or conditions within the disease transmission process. Specifically, the concentration of the probability density function within the cell indicates that the values of S(t), I(t), and R(t) tend to cluster around specific points, reflecting the stability of the system in these states. The presence of two local peaks further indicates two states corresponding to Markov chains.
In order to further study the high transmission state and low transmission state in the process of disease transmission, we drew the time trajectory diagram of each state, as shown in Figure 4. The figure illustrates state 1 with a black line and state 2 with a green line. By observing, we can clearly see that the number of susceptible persons in state 1 is located below state 2. Based on this observation, it can be concluded that state 1 represents the stage of low or limited transmission of the disease and state 2 represents the stage of high or widespread transmission of the disease. This conclusion is also consistent with the value of the state parameter we choose.
Figure 5 illustrates how a switching mechanism influences disease dynamics when subjected to Lévy noise. The selection of parameters is consistent with Figure 2; these parameters satisfy the theorem's conditions for traversal stationary distributions. By looking at Figure 5, it is clear that diseases with Lévy noise exhibit stronger volatility under the action of the switching mechanism. Using the parameters from Table 3, we examine how variations in noise intensity affect disease progression. The other parameters are the same as those in Figure 5.
State | σ1 | σ2 | σ3 | r1(u) | r2(u) | r3(u) |
State 1 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.015 | 0.025 | 0.015 |
State 2 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.003 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
As shown in the comparative analysis of Figures 2 and 6, with the increase of noise intensity, the sizes of the susceptible population and the infected population gradually tend to a stable state and show a significant attenuation trend. This dynamical behavior indicates that the enhancement of stochastic disturbances may drive the disease transmission system to shift towards an extinction phase. Specifically, when the intensity of environmental noise exceeds a certain critical threshold, the stochastic stability of the system is disrupted, resulting in the inability of the number of infected people to maintain sustainable transmission, and thereby promoting the disappearance of the disease within a local area.
This paper primarily investigates the dynamic behavior of the SIR epidemic model with gamma-distributed delays under the influence of Lévy noise and Markovian switching. Initially, we establish the existence and uniqueness of the global positive solution for the model and subsequently explore the stationary distribution of model (2.3). Under Rs>1, the existence of the ergodic stationary distribution for model (2.3) is derived. This indicates that the infectious disease will persist within the population for an extended period. Furthermore, from the Rs and R0, it can be obtained that Rs = R0, when σ1=σ2=σ3=0.
The research methodology employed in this study holds significant potential for broader application in future studies of stochastic systems. For example, it can be effectively applied to models featuring multiple delays and fractional order noise. In addition, research can be extended to other related fields, such as ecosystems, complex networks, public opinion dissemination, etc., where stochastic processes and their interactions play a crucial role. The insights derived from our research results can effectively advance the surveillance, prevention, and control of infectious diseases.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
Jing Yang: Writing - editing, data processing, software. Shaojuan Ma: Funding, writing - review, methodology. Dongmei Wei: Formal analysis, Review.
This work was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.12362005), Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia (No.2024AAC02033), Major Special project of North Minzu University (No.ZDZX201902) and Postgraduate innovation project of North Minzu University (YCX24073).
The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.
[1] |
S. Dong, L. Xu, Y. A, Z. Lan, D. Xiao, B. Gao, Application of a time-delay SIR model with vaccination in COVID-19 prediction and its optimal control strategy, Nonlinear Dyn., 111 (2023), 10677–10692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-023-08308-x doi: 10.1007/s11071-023-08308-x
![]() |
[2] |
H. K. Ebraheem, N. Alkhateeb, H. Badran, E. Sultan, Delayed dynamics of SIR model for COVID-19, Open J. Modell. Simul., 9 (2021), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmsi.2021.92010 doi: 10.4236/ojmsi.2021.92010
![]() |
[3] |
W. O. Kermack, A. G. McKendrick, A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 115 (1927), 700–721. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1927.0118 doi: 10.1098/rspa.1927.0118
![]() |
[4] |
Q. Liu, D. Jiang, T. Hayat, A. Alsaedi, Dynamics of a stochastic SIR epidemic model with distributed delay and degenerate diffusion, J. Franklin Inst., 356 (2019), 7347–7370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.06.030 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.06.030
![]() |
[5] |
M. De la Sen, S. Alonso-Quesada, A. Ibeas, On the stability of an SEIR epidemic model with distributed time-delay and a general class of feedback vaccination rules, Appl. Math. Comput., 270 (2015), 953–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.08.099 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2015.08.099
![]() |
[6] |
M. Li, X. Liu, An SIR epidemic model with time delay and general nonlinear incidence rate, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 1 (2014), 131257. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/131257 doi: 10.1155/2014/131257
![]() |
[7] |
Attaullah, K. Mahdi, M. Yavuz, S. Boulaaras, M. Haiour, V. Pham, Computational approaches on integrating vaccination and treatment strategies in the SIR model using Galerkin time discretization scheme, Math. Comput. Modell. Dyn. Syst., 30 (2024), 758–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/13873954.2024.2405504 doi: 10.1080/13873954.2024.2405504
![]() |
[8] |
G. Zaman, Y. H. Kang, I. H. Jung, Optimal treatment of an SIR epidemic model with time delay, Biosystems, 98 (2009), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2009.05.006 doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2009.05.006
![]() |
[9] |
N. A. Kudryashov, M. A. Chmykhov, M. Vigdorowitsch, Analytical features of the SIR model and their applications to COVID-19, Appl. Math. Modell., 90 (2021), 466–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2020.08.057 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2020.08.057
![]() |
[10] |
A. Kumar, K. Goel, Nilam, A deterministic time-delayed SIR epidemic model: mathematical modeling and analysis, Theory Biosci., 139 (2020), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-019-00300-7 doi: 10.1007/s12064-019-00300-7
![]() |
[11] |
Z. Yaagoub, K. Allali, Global stability of multi-strain SEIR epidemic model with vaccination strategy, Math. Comput. Appl., 28 (2023), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca28010009 doi: 10.3390/mca28010009
![]() |
[12] |
O. Krylova, D. J. Earn, Effects of the infectious period distribution on predicted transitions in childhood disease dynamics, J. R. Soc. Interface, 10 (2013), 20130098. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.0098 doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0098
![]() |
[13] |
F. Wang, X. Wang, S. Zhang, C. Ding, On pulse vaccine strategy in a periodic stochastic SIR epidemic model, Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 66 (2014), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2014.06.003 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2014.06.003
![]() |
[14] |
Y. Cai, Y. Kang, W. Wang, A stochastic SIRS epidemic model with nonlinear incidence rate, Appl. Math. Comput., 305 (2022), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2017.02.003 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2017.02.003
![]() |
[15] |
M. N'zi, I. Yattara, The dynamics of a delayed deterministic and stochastic epidemic SIR models with a saturated incidence rate, Random Oper. Stochastic Equations, 26 (2018), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1515/rose-2018-0021 doi: 10.1515/rose-2018-0021
![]() |
[16] | K. Sato, K. Sawaki, An optimal policy for lockdown periods in a pandemic based on the stochastic SIR model with time delay, in Probability and Statistical Models in Operations Research, Computer and Management Sciences, Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, Cham, (2024), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64597-6_2 |
[17] |
C. Ji, D. Jiang, Threshold behaviour of a stochastic SIR model, Appl. Math. Modell., 38 (2014), 5067–5079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.03.037 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2014.03.037
![]() |
[18] |
M. Yavuz, L. Boulaasair, H. Bouzahir, M. A. Diop, B. Benaid, The impact of two independent gaussian white noises on the behavior of a stochastic epidemic model, J. Appl. Math. Comput. Mech., 23 (2024), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.17512/jamcm.2024.1.10 doi: 10.17512/jamcm.2024.1.10
![]() |
[19] |
N. H. Du, N. N. Nhu. Permanence and extinction for the stochastic SIR epidemic model, J. Differ. Equations, 269 (2020), 9619–9652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2020.06.049 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2020.06.049
![]() |
[20] |
F. Wang, T. Li, Dynamics of a stochastic epidemic model with information intervention and vertical transmission, Electron. Res. Arch., 32 (2024), 3700–3727. https://doi.org/10.3934/era.2024168 doi: 10.3934/era.2024168
![]() |
[21] |
W. Li, B. Wang, D. Huang, V. Rajic, J. Zhao, Dynamical properties of a stochastic tumor-immune model with comprehensive pulsed therapy, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 140 (2024), 108330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2024.108330 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2024.108330
![]() |
[22] |
N. T. Dieu, D. H. Nguyen, N. H. Du, G. Yin, Classification of asymptotic behavior in a stochastic SIR model, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 15 (2016), 1062–1084. https://doi.org/10.1137/15M1043315 doi: 10.1137/15M1043315
![]() |
[23] |
B. E. Berrhazi, M. El Fatini, T. Caraballo, R. Pettersson, A stochastic SIRI epidemic model with Lévy noise, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. - Ser. B, 23 (2018), 3645–3661. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2018057 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018057
![]() |
[24] |
N. Privault, L. Wang, Stochastic SIR Lévy jump model with heavy-tailed increments, J. Nonlinear Sci., 31 (2021), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-020-09670-5 doi: 10.1007/s00332-020-09670-5
![]() |
[25] |
D. Kiouach, Y. Sabbar, The long-time behavior of a stochastic SIR epidemic model with distributed delay and multidimensional Lévy jumps, Int. J. Biomath., 15 (2022), 2250004. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793524522500048 doi: 10.1142/s1793524522500048
![]() |
[26] |
Q. Yang, X. Zhang, D. Jiang, Asymptotic behavior of a stochastic SIR model with general incidence rate and nonlinear Lévy jumps, Nonlinear Dyn., 107 (2022), 2975–2993. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793524522500048 doi: 10.1142/s1793524522500048
![]() |
[27] |
Y. Zhou, W. Zhang, Threshold of a stochastic SIR epidemic model with Lévy jumps, Physica A, 446 (2016), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2015.11.023 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.11.023
![]() |
[28] |
Y. Zhou, S. Yuan, D. Zhao, Threshold behavior of a stochastic SIS model with Lévy jumps, Appl. Math. Comput., 275 (2016), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.03.037 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2014.03.037
![]() |
[29] |
J. Danane, M. Yavuz, M. Yıldız, Stochastic modeling of three-species prey–predator model driven by Lévy jump with mixed Holling-II and Beddington–DeAngelis functional responses, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 751. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7100751 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7100751
![]() |
[30] |
S. Li, SIR epidemic model with general nonlinear incidence rate and Lévy jumps, Mathematics, 12 (2024), 215. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12020215 doi: 10.3390/math12020215
![]() |
[31] |
Q. Liu, D. Jiang, N. Shi, Threshold behavior in a stochastic SIQR epidemic model with standard incidence and regime switching, Appl. Math. Comput., 316 (2018), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2017.08.042 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2017.08.042
![]() |
[32] |
W. Wei, W. Xu, J. Liu, A regime-switching stochastic SIR epidemic model with a saturated incidence and limited medical resources, Int. J. Biomath., 16 (2023), 2250124. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793524522501248 doi: 10.1142/s1793524522501248
![]() |
[33] | M. Jin, Y. Lin, M. Pei, Asymptotic behavior of a regime-switching SIR epidemic model with degenerate diffusion, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2018 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-018-1505-2 |
[34] |
D. Li, S. Liu, Threshold dynamics and ergodicity of an SIRS epidemic model with Markovian switching, J. Differ. Equations, 263 (2017), 8873–8915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2017.08.066 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2017.08.066
![]() |
[35] |
A. Gray, D. Greenhalgh, X. Mao, J. Pan, The SIS epidemic model with Markovian switching, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 394 (2012), 496–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.05.029 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.05.029
![]() |
[36] |
Y. Kang, Y. Fu, Y. Chen, Signal-to-noise ratio gain of an adaptive neuron model with Gamma renewal synaptic input, Acta Mech. Sin., 38 (2022), 521347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-021-09029-6 doi: 10.1007/s10409-021-09029-6
![]() |
[37] | J. E. Sereno, A. D'Jorge, A. Ferramosca, E. A. Hernandez-Vargas, A. H. González, Model predictive control for optimal social distancing in a type SIR-switched model. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 54 (2021), 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.10.264 |
[38] |
T. Caraballo, M. El Fatini, M. G. El Khalifi, R. Gerlach, R. Pettersson, Analysis of a stochastic distributed delay epidemic model with relapse and gamma distribution kernel, Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 133 (2020), 109643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109643 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109643
![]() |
[39] |
C. Liu, Y. Tian, P. Chen, L. Cheung, Stochastic dynamic effects of media coverage and incubation on a distributed delayed epidemic system with Lévy jumps, Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 182 (2024), 114781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.114781 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.114781
![]() |
[40] |
D. Kuang, Q. Yin, J. Li, The threshold of a stochastic SIRS epidemic model with general incidence rate under regime-switching, J. Franklin Inst., 360 (2023), 13624–13647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2022.04.027 doi: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2022.04.027
![]() |
Parameter | Definition | Unit | Value | Source |
Λ | The steady intake of newly susceptible individuals | day−1 | 0.33 | [40] |
μ | The rate of natural deaths within the population | day−1 | 0.006 | [40] |
γ | Rate of recovery among infected individuals | day−1 | 0.04 | [40] |
ε | Mortality rate due to the disease | day−1 | 0.06 | [40] |
β | Transmission rate | day−1 | 0.0035 | [40] |
State | Λ | μ | β | γ | ε | ρ | σ1 | σ2 | σ3 | r1(u) | r2(u) | r3(u) |
State 1 | 0.3 | 0.006 | 0.0023 | 0.05 | 0.019 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
State 2 | 0.4 | 0.008 | 0.0046 | 0.07 | 0.026 | 0.0006 | 0.0015 | 0.0025 | 0.0015 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.15 |
State | σ1 | σ2 | σ3 | r1(u) | r2(u) | r3(u) |
State 1 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.015 | 0.025 | 0.015 |
State 2 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.003 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
Parameter | Definition | Unit | Value | Source |
Λ | The steady intake of newly susceptible individuals | day−1 | 0.33 | [40] |
μ | The rate of natural deaths within the population | day−1 | 0.006 | [40] |
γ | Rate of recovery among infected individuals | day−1 | 0.04 | [40] |
ε | Mortality rate due to the disease | day−1 | 0.06 | [40] |
β | Transmission rate | day−1 | 0.0035 | [40] |
State | Λ | μ | β | γ | ε | ρ | σ1 | σ2 | σ3 | r1(u) | r2(u) | r3(u) |
State 1 | 0.3 | 0.006 | 0.0023 | 0.05 | 0.019 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
State 2 | 0.4 | 0.008 | 0.0046 | 0.07 | 0.026 | 0.0006 | 0.0015 | 0.0025 | 0.0015 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.15 |
State | σ1 | σ2 | σ3 | r1(u) | r2(u) | r3(u) |
State 1 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.015 | 0.025 | 0.015 |
State 2 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.003 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 |