Mini review Topical Sections

Minimally processed fruits as vehicles for foodborne pathogens

  • The consumption of minimally processed fruit (MPF) has increased over the last decade due to a novel trend in the food market along with the raising consumers demand for fresh, organic, convenient foods and the search for healthier lifestyles. Although represented by one of the most expanded sectors in recent years, the microbiological safety of MPF and its role as an emergent foodborne vehicle has caused great concern to the food industry and public health authorities. Such food products may expose consumers to a risk of foodborne infection as they are not subjected to prior microbial lethal methods to ensure the removal or destruction of pathogens before consumption. A considerable number of foodborne disease cases linked to MPF have been reported and pathogenic strains of Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, as well as Norovirus accounted for the majority of cases. Microbial spoilage is also an issue of concern as it may result in huge economic losses among the various stakeholders involved in the manufacturing and commercialization of MPF. Contamination can take place at any step of production/manufacturing and identifying the nature and sources of microbial growth in the farm-to-fork chain is crucial to ensure appropriate handling practices for producers, retailers, and consumers. This review aims to summarize information about the microbiological hazards associated with the consumption of MPF and also highlight the importance of establishing effective control measures and developing coordinated strategies in order to enhance their safety.

    Citation: Jessie Melo, Célia Quintas. Minimally processed fruits as vehicles for foodborne pathogens[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(1): 1-19. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023001

    Related Papers:

    [1] Thomas Bintsis . Microbial pollution and food safety. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(3): 377-396. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.377
    [2] Thomas Bintsis . Foodborne pathogens. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 529-563. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.529
    [3] Leckranee Simothy, Fawzi Mahomoodally, Hudaa Neetoo . A study on the potential of ants to act as vectors of foodborne pathogens. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(2): 319-333. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.2.319
    [4] Noor-Azira Abdul-Mutalib, Syafinaz Amin Nordin, Malina Osman, Ahmad Muhaimin Roslan, Natsumi Ishida, Kenji Sakai, Yukihiro Tashiro, Kosuke Tashiro, Toshinari Maeda, Yoshihito Shirai . The prevalence of foodborne pathogenic bacteria on cutting boards and their ecological correlation with background biota. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(2): 138-151. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.2.138
    [5] Dele Raheem . Outbreaks of listeriosis associated with deli meats and cheese: an overview. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(3): 230-250. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.3.230
    [6] Yunfeng Xu, Attila Nagy, Gary R. Bauchan, Xiaodong Xia, Xiangwu Nou . Enhanced biofilm formation in dual-species culture of Listeria monocytogenes and Ralstonia insidiosa. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(4): 774-783. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.4.774
    [7] Amanova Sholpan, Alexandre Lamas, Alberto Cepeda, Carlos Manuel Franco . Salmonella spp. quorum sensing: an overview from environmental persistence to host cell invasion. AIMS Microbiology, 2021, 7(2): 238-256. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021015
    [8] Marie-Lou Gaucher, Alexandre Thibodeau, Philippe Fravalo, Marie Archambault, Julie Arsenault, Sylvain Fournaise, Ann Letellier, Sylvain Quessy . Broiler chicken carcasses and their associated abattoirs as a source of enterotoxigenic Clostridium perfringens: Prevalence and critical steps for contamination. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(3): 439-454. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.439
    [9] Spyridon Andreas Papatheodorou, Panagiotis Halvatsiotis, Dimitra Houhoula . A comparison of different DNA extraction methods and molecular techniques for the detection and identification of foodborne pathogens. AIMS Microbiology, 2021, 7(3): 304-319. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021019
    [10] Susan Nadin-Davis, Louise Pope, John Devenish, Ray Allain, Dele Ogunremi . Evaluation of the use of CRISPR loci for discrimination of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis strains recovered in Canada and comparison with other subtyping methods. AIMS Microbiology, 2022, 8(3): 300-317. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2022022
  • The consumption of minimally processed fruit (MPF) has increased over the last decade due to a novel trend in the food market along with the raising consumers demand for fresh, organic, convenient foods and the search for healthier lifestyles. Although represented by one of the most expanded sectors in recent years, the microbiological safety of MPF and its role as an emergent foodborne vehicle has caused great concern to the food industry and public health authorities. Such food products may expose consumers to a risk of foodborne infection as they are not subjected to prior microbial lethal methods to ensure the removal or destruction of pathogens before consumption. A considerable number of foodborne disease cases linked to MPF have been reported and pathogenic strains of Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, as well as Norovirus accounted for the majority of cases. Microbial spoilage is also an issue of concern as it may result in huge economic losses among the various stakeholders involved in the manufacturing and commercialization of MPF. Contamination can take place at any step of production/manufacturing and identifying the nature and sources of microbial growth in the farm-to-fork chain is crucial to ensure appropriate handling practices for producers, retailers, and consumers. This review aims to summarize information about the microbiological hazards associated with the consumption of MPF and also highlight the importance of establishing effective control measures and developing coordinated strategies in order to enhance their safety.



    Fruits comprise a large group of plant foods that represent an important source of essential nutrients for a balanced diet. They also provide bioactive phytochemicals, such as flavonoids and phenolic compounds, associated with several health-promoting benefits [1]. In recent years the European Union (EU) health institutions have run campaigns recommending the daily consumption of at least “5 a day” fruit and vegetable portions. In addition, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a minimum of 400 g per capita [2]. These campaigns have been strongly supported by the increasing evidence of an enriched fruit diet associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular diseases and several types of cancer [3]. In fact, a daily fruit intake seems to have a positive impact on the prevention of a great number of chronic diseases [4].

    Worldwide significant changes in lifestyles and major shifts in consumer trends have taken place. Such changes reflect the demand for a new and wider range of fresh products, which along with a shorter available time for home cooking, led the food industry to an emerging market of ready-to-eat fresh products. As a response to a growing demand for convenient, healthy, and easy-to-prepare fresh products, a wide range of minimally processed fruit (MPF) has been developed [5]. These products seem to represent a good alternative to today's lifestyle as they provide a safe handling and a rich source of nutrients, along with an attractive presentation [6]. They can also allow the consumer to reduce waste, since only the edible part of the product is taken home.

    This mini-review aims to gather information about the microbiological and safety issues associated with the consumption of processed fruit taking into consideration their highly perishable nature, as well as provide some insight into prevention measures.

    MPF are products that have undergone physical changes but retain the freshness and the natural properties of the original fruit. Also called as “ready-to-eat”, “pre-cut” and “fresh-cut”, these fruits are submitted to unit operations, which include selection, cleaning, washing, trimming, peeling, cutting/shredding/mashing, sanitizing, and finally packing. During production they are not submitted to microbial lethal techniques (e.g., pasteurization) that might reduce microbiological risks, so these foods can be potential vehicles for the transmission of pathogenic bacteria, viruses, toxins or spore-forming microorganisms [7]. As a result, fresh-cut fruit must be stored, distributed and marketed under refrigeration to achieve a satisfactory shelf-life, which can last between 7 to 20 days if an adequate cooling temperature is maintained. However, the tendency to extend the shelf-life of refrigerated foods may facilitate the proliferation of psychrotrophic microbial contaminants, pathogenic or spoilers. Concern about the microbiological safety of MPF has increased due to the emergence of foodborne infections connected to their consumption and to the increase of vulnerable populations (seniors, weakened immune systems individuals). A number of disease cases have been reported in the United States of America (USA) and EU countries representing a public health hazard and a negative impact on this food industry sector. Contamination can occur at any step of production, processing, distribution, and also as a result of consumer practices. Therefore, understanding the key factors in the transmission chain will be a valuable contribution to establishing best practices and prevention measures. After harvesting the fruits are processed through a series of operations, summarized in Table 1.

    Table 1.  Main steps/operations of industrial processing of minimally processed fruit (MPF) [7],[88][90].
    Selecting ○ Selection of good quality fruits with adequate color, acidity, Brix
    ○ Advanced maturation stages limit the shelf-life of MPF
    ○ Early maturation stages impact negatively the sensorial characteristics of MPF
    Washing ○ Removal of field residues (dust, pesticides, insects, etc.)
    ○ Cooling immediately after washing to lower internal temperature and delay the biological processes that accelerate the maturation
    Peeling ○ Removal of the fruits outer layer when it is not edible or when the final presentation requires it
    ○ Manual, mechanical, enzymatic. Hot water or high-pressure steam may be used
    ○ All peeling should be done in the least abrasive way to prevent the invasion of internal tissues by microorganisms (internalization) and avoid darkening
    Cutting ○ Dimension reduction operations: slicing, chopping, grating, cutting into cubes or into sections
    ○ Manual or mechanical
    ○ Good sharp cutting tools should be used to reduce physical damage to the cells
    Washing (2nd) and disinfection ○ Done by spraying with water or immersing the fruit for a pre-established period of time in chilled water in tanks (1–10 °C) containing an adequate concentration of disinfectants
    ○ Most common disinfectant: chlorine (50–200 ppm)
    ○ Step that reduces the microbial load during MPF processing
    ○ Microbiological and chemical quality of the water should be regularly monitored to avoid cross-contaminations
    Rinsing ○ Removal of excess surface water and disinfectants residues from MPF
    ○ Residual surface drops of moisture and surface exudation of freshly cut fruits may stimulate the growth of fungi and bacteria
    ○ Avoid damage to the fruit tissues
    Packaging ○ MPF weighing
    ○ MPF packaging
    ○ Metal control
    ○ Bags, boxes or trays and different types of protective films
    ○ Refrigerating temperatures

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    MPF are raw foods ready to consume, characterized by cut, non-sterilized, physiologically active surfaces rich in nutrients and water, and not thermal or chemically preserved. The minimal processing (peeling and dimension reducing) contributes to the increase of the tissue respiration rate as well as other biochemical reactions, such as the production of ethylene in the cells, which generates heat and accelerates degradation. As a result, in addition to spoilers and pathogens growth, these products are also susceptible to several visual changes during shelf-life (color, flavor, texture, and surface desiccation) (Figure 1).

    Figure 1.  Impact of minimally processing on the quality of the final product.

    Due to the survival and growth of pathogenic microorganisms on MPF, their consumption has been connected with infections caused by bacteria, viruses and parasites [8],[9]. Nowadays, consumers have a great choice of fruits in the retail markets, which are available in several forms: fresh, minimally processed, canned, frozen, or dried. Processing of these kinds of fruit products consists of a series of operations where contamination and cross-contamination can take place at both the industry or home level. Therefore, as previously mentioned, these commodities are not submitted to any surface pasteurization or cooking, which make them a significant route for foodborne pathogens representing a threat to consumers' health. The major pathogenic microorganisms associated with the consumption of fruit are Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, as well as the Hepatitis A and Norovirus viruses [7],[10],[11].

    Salmonella enterica is one of the leading agents of foodborne illnesses and is responsible for thousands of deaths every year. Infections caused by this pathogen are a major concern to public health and the food industry worldwide, and both animal and non-animal food sources are potential vehicles of disease transmission. In the last two decades a great number of S. enterica outbreaks have been traced to fresh, fresh-cut and frozen fruits consumption, which were associated to a high diversity of serovars. A very high number of serotypes/serovars of S. enterica are distinguished on the basis of somatic, flagellin and capsular antigens, resulting in over 2,500 antigen combinations [12].

    Depending on the host and serotype, S. enterica is the etiologic agent of enteric fever (typhoid fever), enterocolitis/diarrhea and bacteremia. Serotypes S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi are particularly adapted to humans, causing typhoid fever. Non-typhoid Salmonella serotypes are the most frequent salmonellosis agents in developed countries. Several studies have demonstrated the ability of Salmonella spp. to multiply on the leaf surface of young plants suggesting that plants may constitute alternative hosts for Salmonella and play an important role in their transmission to animals [13][15].

    The common reservoir of S. enterica is the human, domestic and wild animal gastrointestinal tract. S. enterica enters the soil and agricultural environments through animal feces and can directly contaminate plants and surface waters used for irrigation and pesticide/fertilizer preparation.

    Salmonellosis occurs after ingestion of contaminated food or water or as a result of contact with symptomatic or asymptomatic carriers. Bacteria survive the acidity of the stomach and colonize the intestine where they invade the epithelial cells and are trapped in vacuoles. Vacuoles containing the bacteria can be destroyed, releasing the microorganisms into the cytosol of host cells and replication can occur allowing Salmonella to display an intracellular lifestyle [16],[17].

    According to the microbiological criteria of the EU [18] Salmonella must be absent in various food categories including vegetables and MPF. If there is fecal food contamination the transmission of the microorganisms will occur, particularly under growth promoting conditions when food is stored at inadequate temperatures. Numerous studies have demonstrated the survival and growth of Salmonella spp. in fruit. Strawn and Danyluk [19] observed an increase in Salmonella cells on cut mangos and papayas, stored at 12 °C, and survival for 28 days when storage was at 4 °C. They also reported the survival of Salmonella on cut mangos and papayas after 180 days of freezing. An increase in Salmonella populations in fresh-cut peaches stored at 20 and 25 °C was also addressed by Alegre et al. [20]. Ukuku et al. [21] observed the survival of Salmonella population in sliced Cantaloupe melon stored at 5 °C for 7 days and an increase in its growth rate in samples stored at 10, 15 and 20 °C. Palekar et al. [22] reported the survival of Salmonella Poona for 21 days in Cantaloupe melon slices stored at 5 °C. In ‘Rocha’ pear, Salmonella grew at 12 and 20 °C, reaching a population of more than 8 log cfu/g, in a period of 24 hours. However, in three days at 8 °C, it only increased about 1 log cfu/g and at 4 °C it did not multiply [23].

    The pathogenic strain of Escherichia coli, namely E. coli O157:H7, is a relevant pathogen related to MPF safety since it has been implicated in some outbreaks and sporadic cases. E. coli strains are members of the gastrointestinal microbiota of man and mammals. Fecal matter can contaminate food and water, including irrigation and recreational waters. Human infections by pathogenic E. coli strains occur after the consumption of contaminated food such as undercooked meat, contaminated fresh vegetable and fruit or through contact with contaminated animals [24]. Disease transmission through person-to-person contact may also occur when proper hygiene care is not ensured. Fruit, like any other food of plant origin, can be contaminated by cross-contamination through contact with raw materials and meat. Food handlers (symptomatic or asymptomatic carriers) may also be responsible for the transmission of the bacteria [25],[26].

    The ability of E. coli strains to survive and grow in environments other than the gastrointestinal tract represents a public health threat. E. coli has been isolated from environments such as soil, manure and irrigation water. However, it has also been found in the internal tissues of lettuce [27] and plant roots [28]. MPF permit E. coli dissemination in food industry processing and packaging environments, contributing to the transmission through the food chain when good manufacturing practices are not complied. E. coli O157:H7 can survive and multiply outside the gut and has been implicated in various disease outbreaks related to the intake of fresh-cut fruits and vegetables [7]. Abadias et al. [29] found the survival of the E. coli O157:H7 population inoculated in fresh-cut pineapple and melon, packed in a modified atmosphere, and stored at 5 °C for 15 days. In peaches an increase of 2 log cfu/g was observed in the E. coli O157:H7 population at 20 and 25 °C [20]. Strawn and Danyluk [19] reported that E. coli O157:H7 was able to grow in fresh-cut mango and papaya stored at 23 °C, surviving for 28 days when samples were stored at 4 °C and 180 days when frozen at -20 °C. In ‘Rocha’ pear E. coli showed significant growth at 12 and 20 °C, reaching high populations (>8 log cfu/g, in 24 h). At 8 °C the microorganism increased more than 1 log cfu/g in 3 days, although at 4 °C no proliferation occurred [23].

    Listeria monocytogenes is a robust pathogen with relevance to public health and the food industry as it can lead to listeriosis, a severe foodborne disease affecting mostly risk groups, such as children, pregnant women, elderly and immunocompromised people. Although relatively rare compared to other foodborne infections, listeriosis is associated with a high mortality rate and clinical cases can lead to 20–30% deaths [30]. This bacterium is widely found in the environment (soil, water, manure, decaying vegetation), can persist in mammalian and avian feces, and also in multiple food processing environments. Its ability to survive and grow in multiple niches is supported by a complex system of tolerance responses [31]. Those responses help the pathogen to survive to several inhibitors frequently found in the food industry, such as disinfectants, sanitizers, low-pH conditions, osmotic pressure and eventually allowing it to remain in this environment for long periods [32]. Strains that are involved in foodborne diseases seem to be also linked to biofilm formation, which makes them even more difficult to eliminate from industrial food facilities once they are established [33]. As a psychrotrophic, L. monocytogenes can survive and multiply at low temperatures and may reach dangerous levels in foods kept under refrigeration. The ability of L. monocytogenes to grow under temperature abuse conditions (3 days at 4 °C followed by 5 days at 8 °C) was also reported on fresh-cut ‘Conference’ pears packed under modified atmosphere during their shelf-life [34]. Furthermore, this tolerance response system permits the pathogen to have a successful transition from food to the gastrointestinal host system, leading to cell invasion and the establishment of infection [35].

    This pathogen has been associated with a great variety of foods including dairy, poultry, meat, seafood, fruits, and vegetables [36]. In the last decade, the importance of the consumption of non-animal foods, as a cause of listeriosis has been increasingly recognized in fresh, fresh-cut, and frozen fruits [37],[38]. Along with S. enterica and E. coli O157:H7, L. monocytogenes became a microorganism of great concern to fruit and vegetable safety [39]. In 2011, the consumption of contaminated cantaloupe was responsible for a multistate outbreak in the USA resulting in 147 people infected and 33 deaths. In 2014, another multistate listeriosis outbreak associated with the ingestion of caramelized apples cross-contaminated at the packing facility caused 35 hospitalizations and three deaths [40]. Environmental samples collected at the apple packinghouse and clinical isolates revealed the presence of similar strains [41]. In the same year, an outbreak linked to stone fruits (peaches, plums and nectarines) contaminated with L. monocytogenes was also reported [42].

    For a long-term period, it had been generally assumed that intact fruits were only contaminated by microorganisms at the external surface and the internal acidic environment of most fruits would prevent bacterial contamination. However, the whole fruit can also serve as a vehicle for foodborne disease transmission. Caramel apples were assumed to be a minimal risk food for listeriosis due to the internal fruit acidity and to the low water activity of caramel, but growth of Listeria had already been reported in fresh apples by Conway [43]. The survival, growth, and internalization of L. monocytogenes in fresh and processed fruits have been well documented and they are now recognized as one of the emergent food products at risk of listeriosis transmission [42]. Graça et al. [23] studied the growth of Listeria spp. on fresh-cut ‘Rocha’ pear and reported the bacteria capacity to multiply at 20, 12, 8, and 4 °C, despite needing adaptation periods inferior to 24 h at 8 and 4 °C. According to Zeller et al. [44] the growth of L. monocytogenes on MPF correlated significantly with the pH. None of the tested MPF with a pH below 4 showed a significant proliferation of this bacterium.

    L. monocytogenes is usually killed by cooking and high-temperature methods, so food products eaten raw, such as fresh, fresh-cut and frozen fruits, are at the highest risk. According to the EU regulation, the absence of L. monocytogenes is not required in all ready-to-eat products. In food products that support growth, the levels of L. monocytogenes cannot increase higher than 100 cfu/g over the shelf-life [18]. However, in the USA there is zero tolerance for this pathogen.

    Taking into consideration the characteristics of L. monocytogenes, it becomes a difficult, if not impossible task, to completely eliminate it from processing environments. Furthermore, the last reported outbreaks, sporadic cases and several recalls of fresh and fresh-cut fruit due to the presence of L. monocytogenes have highlighted the serious hazard of this food products safety and the urgent need for improving control measures in the fruit supply chain [45].

    Food-borne viral infections have been increasingly recognized as one of the major causes of human diseases. Norovirus (NoV) has emerged worldwide as a leading agent of acute gastroenteritis outbreaks, causing million cases annually. Although characterized as mild infections, in risk groups, such as children under five, elderly or immunocompromised people, these diseases can be responsible for severe outcomes with a high rate of hospitalizations and deaths [46]. NoV are enteric pathogens, non-enveloped single-strand positive-sense RNA viruses, classified into the Caliciviridae family, which comprises a genetically and antigenically diverse group, having at least seven known genotypes (GI-GVII). Three genotypes (GI, GII and GIV) can cause disease in humans, being the GII the most frequently reported [47].

    NoV and hepatitis A virus (HAV) are the main foodborne viruses associated with the consumption of fresh, MPF, and frozen berries [2], as well as the pathogenic bacteria mentioned before. Fresh and frozen fruits, such as grapes, raspberries, blueberries and strawberries have been reported as vehicles of an increasing number of NoV outbreaks [48][50]. One of the most severe NoV outbreaks occurred in Germany in 2012, when 11,000 people were affected by the consumption of frozen berries imported from China [51]. In March 2009 a massive outbreak associated with frozen raspberry ingestion caused 500 cases in a primary school in Finland [52]. Fruits pose a significant risk to foodborne viral transmission as they are consumed raw and are not submitted to lethal treatments. Contamination can occur at any step of the production chain. Even an endophyte contamination of fruit has been suggested [53]. Water is a critical vehicle in the virus's infectious cycle. Non-enveloped RNA viruses are usually present in human sewage in high loads. They are neither completely removed or inactivated by conventional sewage treatment processes and can be discharged into the environment. The use of contaminated water in agriculture or in processing operations (washing steps) are major vehicles of viral transmission. The shedding of virus particles by symptomatic or asymptomatic carriers can spread the disease through handlers and surfaces/equipment contributing to the viral transmission [54]. Although the majority of noroviruses outbreaks were caused by frozen berries the consumption of minimally processed fruits can also represent a potential risk for the transmission of this foodborne disease etiological agent [55][57].

    NoV shows high resistance to environmental stressors, such as heat, high/low pH, drying, light and UV exposure and also to chemical and physical disinfection treatments [58]. This persistence allows them to remain infective in foods for periods from 2 days to 4 weeks. As most foodborne viruses they are supposed to have very low infectious doses and fewer than 10 viral particles are required to cause disease [59]. NoV infections usually have a 12–48 h incubation period followed by symptoms, such as vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal cramps, and low-grade fever.

    NoV has also shown to be resistant to the most common food preservation methods and can survive chilling, freezing, acidification, reduced water activity and modified atmosphere packaging [60] Minimally processing can induce cross-contamination of uncontaminated fruit during all post-harvest operations/utensils, in addition to the involved workers' health condition [61]. The long-term persistence of NoV on surfaces of food preparation plays a significant role in viruses dissemination [62][64].

    Screening food products for the presence of foodborne viruses is challenging due to the physical and chemical properties of the food matrices. On the other hand, cultivating foodborne viruses in cell cultures is yet not possible. Therefore, the detection methods of these microorganisms rely upon the molecular techniques that are crucial in the investigation and prevention of outbreaks. The last decade has shown significant development and optimization of new and sensitive methods of NoV detection and the RT-PCR assay has become the gold standard for food products. Rapid laboratory diagnosis can be an important tool in controlling NoV outbreaks and guiding the choice of prevention measures such as cleaning/disinfection protocols, isolation of infected food handlers and surveillance of the pathogen in the food processing environment.

    MPF are susceptible to microbiological contamination at any step of the production chain and eventually in the consumers' kitchen. The contamination can originate from human, animal or environmental sources and take place during the pre-harvesting, harvesting, and post-harvesting stages.

    One of the pre-harvesting sources of contamination is the soil where plants are cultivated since soil is a natural habitat of various microorganisms and crop production is often fertilized by untreated manure/human biosolids, which can harbor high levels of pathogenic microorganisms [65]. Low quality water sources used for irrigation, such as reutilized or waste waters, can as well contribute to significant contamination. Meteorological conditions also matter and the occurrence of rain or drought, the presence of dust, aerosol, and feces may have a great influence on microbiota proliferation [66].

    During the post-harvest all the steps are susceptible to cross-contamination and can eventually lead to an increase of the microbial population on the final products. Fruit washing may not remove microorganisms as they can remain attached to plant surfaces or become internalized in the edible parts of the fruit [67]. The efficacy of antimicrobials used in the disinfection never reaches 100% as their active principles may be consumed in chemical reactions with organic matter or microorganisms may be protected in biofilms or internalized in the fruit tissues. The methods used to decontaminate the fruits are based on physical or chemical processes or a combination of both. The most widely used disinfecting agent in the fresh food processing industry is chlorine. However, the levels of bacterial reductions obtained when using chlorine solutions in MPF, at the concentrations (50–200 ppm) and contact times allowed (1–2 minutes), are around 1 to 2 log cfu/g [68]. The most active form of chlorine is hypochlorous acid whose highest activity occurred between pH values of 5.0 and 6.0 as measured by Marin et al. [69]. In addition, the same authors showed that the most adequate pH regulators were the non-organic ones, such as phosphoric acid when compared to the organic pH regulators (for example citric acid). The microbiological characteristics of the water used in the washing procedures are crucial to avoid cross contaminations. For example, Penteado et al. [70] observed that mangoes (‘Tommy Atkins' variety) can get contaminated with S. enterica when contaminated water at 47 °C was used in the washing.

    The post-harvest microbial contamination of MPF is also associated with a great number of sources: the use of contaminated containers/utensils, unhygienic conditions of food handling, unhygienic surfaces/equipment, packaging material, transport vehicles, and inadequate storing temperature. For example, the peeling and size reduction operations as well as food contact surfaces also present the risk of contamination and recontamination due to the contact of contaminated equipment with fruits (Figure 2).

    Figure 2.  Main sources of MPF microbial contamination at the post-harvest level.

    A study conducted in industrial plants revealed high levels of total aerobic microorganisms, higher than 20 cfu/cm2, on all food contact surfaces, namely in peeling equipment, knives, and cutting boards, among others [71]. The same study reported high counts of the Enterobacteriaceae family (β-Glucuronidase positive E. coli) on cutters (90 cfu/cm2) and the chopping boards (76 cfu/cm2). In fact, once introduced, some microorganisms are able to persist and form biofilms if the design, composition and topography of surfaces allow. Poor design characteristics, such as horizontal surfaces, right angles, welds/joins, and container/tank corners are critical regarding hygiene, being more difficult to clean and, more susceptible to the development of biofilms, as studied in fresh-cut washing containers [72]. Another example of the importance of well-designed equipment was the one related to the listeriosis outbreak caused by cantaloupe consumption, in 2011, which indicated a postharvest contamination of fresh melons. Changes in the equipment used for the washing and drying process of these fruit products created favorable environmental conditions for microbial growth. This equipment, not designed for an efficient sanitization, allowed the contact of its components (such as brushes and felt rollers) with the fruits enabling pathogen adhesion and colonization, which may have spread to other food contact surfaces and promoted microbial contamination [73].

    Packaging is a critical step in MPF processing and should be carried out with maximum hygiene. The modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) is one of the available techniques at this level to reduce the microbial load and extend the shelf-life of fresh fruit and MPF. This method consists of the modification of the internal atmosphere of a package, replacing the oxygen content with carbon dioxide or nitrogen. The process decreases the respiration rate, ethylene production, and enzymatic browning, providing a delay of ripening and suppressing the growth of indigenous aerobic microbiota, then maintaining the appearance of the fruit. Atmospheres with low O2 increase the anaerobic metabolism of fruits and fermentation which may produce acetaldehyde and taste-altering compounds. Concerning microbial growth, atmospheres with low O2 concentrations inhibit the growth of most aerobic degrading microorganisms, such as Gram-negative bacteria or filamentous fungi. However, under certain conditions, the growth of spoilage facultative anaerobic yeasts and anaerobic or microaerophilic psychrotrophic pathogenic microorganisms, such as Clostridium spp. and L. monocytogenes may be stimulated. The growth and toxin production of Clostridium botulinum is of particular concern. On the other hand, the extension of shelf-life may increase the available time and the possibility of pathogens, if present in these food products, to grow [7].

    The use of MAP for fresh-cut fruits requires careful selection of the film and package type for each product. Temperature control at storage and distribution is also an important factor for an effective MAP system. However, the effect of MAP on microorganisms can vary depending mainly on the storage conditions and the type of product. According to Corbo et al. [74], MAP containing 5% O2 and 30% CO2 had no effect on L. monocytogenes growth on cactus-pear; the pathogen survived and also grew at refrigeration temperatures (4 and 8 °C). Furthermore, Abadias et al. [29] observed that high levels of CO2 (11, 25, 39 %) under 1, 2 and 3 days of storage had little or no inhibitory effect on E. coli growth on fresh-cut melon kept at 25 °C. On the other hand, Salmonella spp. showed high variability in response to MAP conditions in different studies. Raybaudi-Massilia et al. [75] reported a slight decrease in Salmonella Enteriditis population on fresh-cut apples and pears at 5 °C, under MAP conditions. On the contrary, an increase in Salmonella Michigan population on fresh-cut peaches was registered when samples were stored at 25 °C with a CO2 level higher than 20% [20].

    However, it is important to highlight that some of the mentioned hazards are predictable but many of them may be unexpected, particularly in cases of endophytes, when microorganisms produce biofilms, or internalize in the fruit tissues.

    The ability of human pathogens to internalize plant tissues has been addressed in a great number of studies. Human pathogens can survive the harsh soil environment, adhere to, and actively invade plants. They can enter plant tissues either through natural elements (stomata, roots junctions, flowers), as well as through damaged tissues (cut surfaces, wounds) [76],[77]. The contact with pathogens leads to infiltration and colonization of the plant tissues and this process can take place both at pre-harvesting and post-harvesting phases.

    The presence of human enteric pathogens in crop fields can be a result of contaminated irrigation water, climate conditions (rain and wind), insect and nematode vectors [78]. Soils and plants can be contaminated by contact with raw manure or sewage and the enteric pathogens persistence in this kind of environment has been observed [79]. E. coli O157:H7 and S. enterica have been isolated from the feces of birds and domestic animals and transmission to soil and plants has been well documented [80]. MPF surfaces are especially favorable to the entrance of pathogens since current sanitizing practices are not effective to remove or inactivate internalized bacteria. Surface bacteria may not be totally removed by washing procedures with hypochlorite at the standard concentrations during industrial processing [81].

    Multiple studies have addressed the potential for the systemic transfer of internalized bacterial cells within plant tissues. Holden et al. [82] were able to show that internalized E. coli O157:H7 and S. enterica remained viable and cultivable in the leaves of lettuce, spinach and tomato. Deering et al. [83] also observed the viability and persistence of those pathogens after a period of three weeks on the same vegetables, which is relevant to the harvesting time of those plants. In addition, the pathogenicity and virulence of those bacteria are not affected by the plant colonization [84].

    To be able to colonize the surface or interior of a plant human pathogenic bacteria must compete with the naturally present microbiota. To utilize plant nutrients and ensure their persistence in the tissues those microorganisms may depend on the presence of natural endophytes (bacteria or fungal populations), which can provide carbon and energy sources (via degradation of cell wall polymers or induced secretion of sugars) that otherwise would be inaccessible to the pathogens [85],[86]. Successful pathogens probably accept nutrient efflux mechanisms of the host to redirect nutrient flux. However, nutrient acquisition used by bacterial pathogens and the mechanisms they use to alter host physiology, notably the efflux of sugars to support growth, are poorly understood [56]. Future research is needed on the identification of bacterial effectors and their target genes in plant cells that facilitate pathogen nutrition [56],[87]. A better understanding of the dynamic interactions between the plant endophytes and soil microbiome as sources of contamination during plant growth are relevant to the fresh produce production chain. The internalization of pathogenic microorganisms and the occurrence of endophytism in vegetables make microbial contamination increasingly unpredictable and need to be considered in risk assessment.

    It is crucial to apply preventive measures to reduce foodborne pathogens throughout the farm-to-fork chain of fresh-cut fruit production and ensure safety and quality, decreasing the risk of any potential outbreak due to their consumption (Table 2).

    Table 2.  Preventive measures to reduce microbiota contamination and growth (pathogens and spoilers) during post-harvest stages of MPF fruits (HACCP- Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point).
    Preventive measures Operations/actions
    Use good quality water in: Cleaning
    Washing
    Disinfecting
    Disinfection: Chemical (chlorine, organic acids, electrolyzed water) or physical (irradiation) processes or a combination of both
    Most common disinfectant: chlorine
    Select refrigeration temperatures during: (Avoid temperature abuse) Storage
    Transportation
    Distribution
    Exhibition/Marketing
    In restaurants, hotels, at home
    Avoid moisture in the processing environment and on fruits surface: Drying after washing and rinsing
    (Avoid condensation in packages)
    Use proper and sharp cutting equipment: Reduction of fruit tissue destruction
    Segregation is a mandatory rule to decrease cross-contamination: Segregate processed from unprocessed fruit
    Segregate animal from plant origin food
    Select hygienic-designed equipment and infrastructures: Choice of containers without corners, welds, right angles
    Select cleaning and disinfection plans of food plants, food contact surfaces and equipment with the appropriate frequency: Elect processing facilities with a hygienic architecture
    Choose hygiene-designed equipment
    Disinfectants are not 100% efficient
    Avoid biofilm production
    Prevent aerosol formation
    Adopt good manufacturing practices: Prevent fecal contamination
    Stimulate the adoption of strict personal hygiene
    Provide education for food handlers
    Implement HACCP
    Be aware that microorganisms can: Express virulence
    Evolve and mutate
    Adapt to disinfectants/biocides
    Grow during shelf-life
    Produce biofilms
    Internalize the tissues of the fruit
    Possess an endophytic profile

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The safety of MPF is a relevant issue since these food products can act as vehicles for foodborne infections and diseases associated with their consumption are of concern to public health services and to the food industry. Controlling them requires specific guidelines aimed at reducing the risks of contamination, from pre to post-harvest stages until the consumers' table. Implementation of good and hygienic agricultural and manufacturing practices prior, during and after the processing of MPF, including an efficient cold chain, along with compliance to HACCP principles by all the involved stakeholders, are key measures to mitigate outbreak risks and minimize the economic impact of MPF spoilage. Regular monitoring and surveillance from food safety authorities and regulatory agencies are also crucial strategies to increase the quality, safety, and shelf-life of MPF. Nevertheless, epidemiological traceability of these products as human pathogens carriers is difficult to achieve. Further studies are required on microbial internalization, endophytism, and microbiological survival and growth on MPF at different stages of processing. Professionals, from production to commercialization, should be made aware that microorganisms evolve, and adapt to biocides/disinfectants and various stressful conditions, in addition to their ability to internalize, which makes microbial contamination highly unpredictable. Control measures should focus on prevention and be strongly robust to deal with the growing unpredictability of microbial risks.


    Acknowledgments



    This work was supported by MED/UIDB/05183/2020 funded by FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology.

    Conflict of interest



    The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

    [1] Septembre-Malaterre A, Remize F, Poucheret P (2018) Fruits and vegetables, as a source of nutritional compounds and phytochemicals: Changes in bioactive compounds during lactic fermentation. Food Res Int 104: 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.09.031
    [2] Lafarga T, Colás-Medá P, Abadias M, et al. (2019) Strategies to reduce microbial risk and improve quality of fresh and processed strawberries. Inn Food Sci Emer Tech 52: 197-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2018.12.012
    [3] Siroli LF, Patrignani DI, Serrazanetti F, et al. (2015) Innovative strategies based on the use of bio-control agents to improve the safety, shelf-life and quality of minimally processed fruits and vegetables. Trends Food Sci Tech 46: 302-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2015.04.014
    [4] Samtiya M, Aluko RE, Dhewa T, et al. (2021) Potential health benefits of food-plant derived bioactive components: An Overview. Foods 10: 839-864. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10040839
    [5] Prakash A, Baskaran R, Paramasivam N, et al. (2018) Essential oils based nanoemulsions to improve the microbial quality of minimally processed fruits and vegetables: A review. Food Res Int 111: 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.05.066
    [6] Corato H (2019) Improving the quality and shelf-life of fresh and minimally processed fruits and vegetables for a modern industry: A comprehensive critical review from the traditional technologies into the most promising advancements. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 60: 940-975. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2018.1553025
    [7] Oliveira M, Abadias M, Usall J, et al. (2015) Application of modified atmosphere packaging as a safety approach to fresh-cut fruits and vegetables – A review. Trends Food Sci Tech 46: 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2015.07.017
    [8] Heaton JC, Jones K (2008) Microbial contamination of fruit and vegetables and the behavior of enteropathogens in the phyllosphere: a review. J Appl Microbiol 104: 613-626. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03587.x
    [9] Olaimat AN, Holley RA (2012) Factors influencing the microbial safety of fresh produce: a review. Food Microbiol 32: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2012.04.016
    [10] Strawn LK, Schneider KR, Danyluk MD (2011) Microbial safety of tropical fruits. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 51: 132-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408390903502864
    [11] Pérez-Lavalle L, Carrasco E, Valero A (2020) Strategies for microbial decontamination of fresh blueberries and derived products. Foods 9: 1558. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111558
    [12] McQuiston JR, Waters RJ, Dinsmore BA, et al. (2007) Molecular determination of H antigens of Salmonella by use of microsphere-based liquid array. J Clin Microbiol 49: 565-573. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01323-10
    [13] Brandl MT, Amundson R (2008) Leaf age as risk factor in contamination of lettuce with Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 2298-2306. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02459-07
    [14] Melotto M, Panchal S, Roy D (2014) Plant innate immunity against human bacterial pathogens. Front Microbiol 5: 411. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00411
    [15] Wiedemann A, Virlougeux-Payant I, Chaussé A, et al. (2014) Interaction of Salmonella with animals and plants. Front Microbiol 5: 791. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00791
    [16] Coburn B, Grassi GA, Finlay BB (2007) Salmonella, the host and disease: a brief review. Immun Cell Biol 85: 112-118. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.icb.7100007
    [17] Mali-Kale P, Winfree S, Steele-Mortimer O (2012) The bimodal lifestyle of Salmonella in epithelial cells: replication in cytosol obscures defects in vacuolar replication. PLoS One 7: e38732. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038732
    [18] European Commission Regulation.Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs. Off J Eur Union L (2005) 338: 1-26.
    [19] Strawn LK, Danyluk MD (2010) Fate of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella spp. on fresh and frozen cut mangoes and papayas. Int J Food Microbiol 138: 78-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.12.002
    [20] Alegre I, Abadias M, Anguera M, et al. (2010) Fate of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella and Listeria innocua on minimally-processed peaches under different storage conditions. Food Microbiol 27: 862-868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2010.05.008
    [21] Ukuku DO, Huang L, Sommers C (2015) Efficacy of sanitizer treatments on survival and growth parameters of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and Listeria monocytogenes on fresh-cut pieces of Cantaloupe during storage. J Food Prot 78: 1288-1295. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-233
    [22] Palekar MP, Taylor TM, Maxim JE, et al. (2015) Reduction of Salmonella enterica serotype Poona and background microbiota on fresh-cut cantaloupe by electron beam irradiation. Int J Food Microbiol 202: 66-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.02.001
    [23] Graça A, Santo D, Quintas C, et al. (2017) Growth of Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica and Listeria spp., and their inactivation using ultraviolet energy and electrolyzed water, on ‘Rocha’ fresh-cut pears. Food Control 77: 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.01.017
    [24] Yoo BK, Liu Y, Juneja V, et al. (2015) Growth characteristics of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) stressed by chlorine, sodium chloride, acid and starvation on lettuce and cantaloupe. Food Control 55: 97-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.02.040
    [25] Berger CN, Sodha SV, Shaw RK, et al. (2010) Fresh fruit and vegetables as vehicles for the transmission of human pathogens. Environ Microbiol 12: 2385-2397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02297.x
    [26] Croxen MA, Law RJ, Scholz R, et al. (2013) Recent advances in understanding enteric pathogenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev 26: 822-880. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00022-13
    [27] Solomon EB, Yaron S, Matthews KR (2002) Transmission of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from contaminated manure and irrigation water to lettuce plant tissue and its subsequent internalization. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 397-400. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.1.397-400.2002
    [28] Natvig EE, Ingham SC, Ingham BH, et al. (2002) Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli contamination of root and leaf vegetables grown in soils with incorporated bovine manure. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 2737-2744. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.6.2737-2744.2002
    [29] Abadias M, Alegre I, Oliveira M, et al. (2012) Growth potential of Escherichia coli on fresh-cut fruits (melon and pineapple) and vegetables (carrot and escarole) stored under different conditions. Food Control 27: 37-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.02.032
    [30] Buchanan RL, Gorris LGM, Heyman MM, et al. (2017) A review of Listeria monocytogenes: An update on outbreaks, virulence, dose response, ecology, and risk assessments. Food Control 75: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.12.016
    [31] NicAogáin K, O'Byrne CP (2016) The role of stress and stress adaptations determining the fate of bacterial pathogen Listeria monocytogenes in the food chain. Front Microbiol 7: 1865. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01865
    [32] Ferreira V, Wiedmann M, Teixeira P, et al. (2014) Listeria monocytogenes persistence in food-associated environments: Epidemiology, strain characteristics, and implications for public health. J Food Prot 77: 150-170. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-150
    [33] Colagiorgi A, Bruini I, Di Ciccio PA, et al. (2017) Listeria monocytogenes biofilms in the wonderland of food industry. Pathogens 6: 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens6030041
    [34] Colás Medà P, Vinas I, Alegre I, et al. (2017) The impact of a cold chain break on the survival of Salmonella enterica and Listeria monocytogenes on minimally processed “Conference” pears during their shelf life. J Sci Food Agric 97: 3077-3080. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8127
    [35] Melo J, Andrew PW, Faleiro ML (2015) Listeria monocytogenes in cheese and the dairy environment remains a food safety challenge: The role of stress responses. Food Res Int 67: 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.10.031
    [36] Shamloo E, Hosseini H, Moghadam ZA, et al. (2019) Importance of Listeria monocytogenes in food safety: a review of its prevalence, detection, and antibiotic resistance. Iran J Vet Res 20: 241-254.
    [37] Garner D, Kathariou S (2016) Fresh produce-associated listeriosis outbreaks, sources of concern, teachable moments, and insights. J Food Prot 79: 337-344. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-387
    [38] Lopez-Valladares G, Danielsson-Tham ML, Tham W (2018) Implicated food products for listeriosis and changes in serovars of Listeria monocytogenes affecting humans for recent decades. Foodborne Pathog Dis 15: 387-397. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2017.2419
    [39] Gustafson RE, Ryser ET (2017) Thermal inactivation and growth of Listeria monocytogenes during production and storage of caramel apples. Food Control 79: 234-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.03.043
    [40] Glass KA, Golden MC, Wanless BJ, et al. (2015) Growth of Listeria monocytogenes within a caramel-coated apple microenvironment. AMS mBio 6: e01232-15. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01232-15
    [41] Ruiz-Llacsahuanga B, Hamilton A, Zaches R, et al. (2016) Utility of rapid tests to assess the prevalence of indicator organisms (aerobic plate count, Enterobacteriaceae, coliforms, Escherichia coli, and Listeria spp.) in apple packinghouses. Int J Food Microbiol 337: 108949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108949
    [42] De Jesus AJ, Sheth I, Kwon HJ, et al. (2020) Survival of a serotype 4b strain and a serotype 1/2a strain of Listeria monocytogenes, isolated from a stone fruit outbreak investigation, on whole stone fruit at 4 °C. Int J Food Microbiol 334: 108801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108801
    [43] Conway WS, Leverentz B, Saftner RA, et al. (2000) Survival and growth of Listeria monocytogenes on fresh-cut apples slices and its interactions with Glomerella cingulata and Penicillium expansum. Plant Dis 84: 177-181. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.2.177
    [44] Ziegler M, Rüegg S, Stephan R, et al. (2018) Growth potential of Listeria monocytogenes in six different RTE fruit products: impact of food matrix, storage temperature and shelf life. Ital J Food Saf 7: 7581. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2018.7581
    [45] Carpentier B, Cerf O (2011) Review–persistence of Listeria monocytogenes in food industry equipment and premises. Int J Food Microbiol 145: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.01.005
    [46] Bosch A, Gkogka E, Le Guyader FS, et al. (2018) Foodborne viruses: Detection, risk assessment, and control options in food processing. Int J Food Microbiol 285: 110-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.06.001
    [47] Marsh Z, Shah MP, Wikswo ME (2018) Epidemiology of foodborne norovirus outbreaks -United States, 2009–2015. Food Saf (Tokyo) 6: 58-66. https://doi.org/10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.2017028
    [48] Butot S, Putallaz T, Sánchez G (2008) Effects of sanitation, freezing and frozen storage on enteric viruses in berries and herbs. Int J Food Microbiol 126: 30-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.04.033
    [49] Le Guyader FS, Mittelholzer C, Haugarreau L, et al. (2004) Detection of noroviruses in raspberries associated with a gastroenteritis outbreak. Int J Food Microbiol 97: 179-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.04.018
    [50] Quansah JK, Gazula H, Holland R, et al. (2019) Microbial quality of blueberries for the fresh market. Food Control 100: 92-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.12.034
    [51] Bernard H, Faber M, Wilking H, et al. (2014) Large multistate outbreak of norovirus gastroenteritis associated with frozen strawberries, Germany, 2012. Euro Surveill 19: 20719. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES2014.19.8.20719
    [52] Sarvikivi E, Roivainen M, Maunula L, et al. (2012) Multiple norovirus outbreaks linked to imported frozen raspberries. Epidemiol Infect 140: 260-267. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268811000379
    [53] Warriner K, Ibrahim F, Dickinson M, et al. (2013) Internalization of human pathogens within growing salad vegetables. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 20: 117-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.2003.10648040
    [54] Lopman B, Gastañaduy P, Park GW, et al. (2012) Environmental transmission of norovirus gastroenteritis. Curr Opin Virol 2: 96-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2011.11.005
    [55] Harris LJ, Farber JN, Beuchat LR, et al. (2003) Outbreaks associated with fresh produce: incidence, growth, and survival of pathogens in fresh and fresh-cut produce. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2: 78-141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2003.tb00031.x
    [56] Alegbeleye OO, Singleton I, Sant'Ana AS (2018) Sources and contamination routes of microbial pathogens to fresh produce during field cultivation: A review. Food Microbiol 73: 177-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2018.01.003
    [57] Chatziprodromidou IP, Bellou G, Vantarakis G, et al. (2018) Viral outbreaks linked to fresh produce consumption: a systematic review. J Appl Microbiol 124: 932-942. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13747
    [58] Vasickova P, Pavlik I, Verani M, et al. (2010) Issues concerning survival of viruses on surfaces. Food Environ Virol 2: 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12560-010-9025-6
    [59] Teunis PFM, Le Guyader FS, Liu P (2020) Noroviruses are highly infectious but there is strong variation in host susceptibility and virus pathogenicity. Epidemics 32: 100401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2020.100401
    [60] Baert L, Debevere J, Uyttendaele M (2009) The efficacy of preservation methods to inactivate foodborne viruses. Int J Food Microbiol 131: 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.03.007
    [61] Terio V, Bottaro M, Pavoni E, et al. (2017) Occurrence of hepatitis A and E and norovirus GI and GII in ready-to-eat vegetables in Italy. Int J Food Microbiol 249: 61-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.03.008
    [62] D'Souza D, Sair A, Williams K, et al. (2006) Persistence of caliciviruses on environmental surfaces and their transfer to food. Int J Food Microbiol 108: 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.10.024
    [63] Mattison K, Karthikeyan K, Abebe M, et al. (2007) Survival of calicivirus in foods and on surfaces: experiments with feline calicivirus as a surrogate for norovirus. J Food Prot 70: 500-503. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-70.2.500
    [64] Escudero-Abarca B, Rawsthorne H, Gensel C, et al. (2012) Persistence and transferability of Noroviruses on and between common surfaces and foods. J Food Prot 75: 927-35. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-11-460
    [65] Gutierrez-Rodrigues E, Adhikari A (2018) Pre-harvesting farming practices impacting quality of fresh produce safety. ASM Microbiol Spectrum 6: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.PFS-0022-2018
    [66] Yeni F, Alpas H (2017) Vulnerability of global food production to extreme climatic events. Food Res Int 96: 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.03.020
    [67] Machado-Moreira B, Richards K, Brennan F, et al. (2019) Microbial contamination of fresh produce: What, where and how?. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 18: 1727-1750. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12487
    [68] Gil MI, Selma MV, López-Gálvez F, et al. (2009) Fresh cut product sanitation and wash water disinfection: Problems and solutions. Int J Food Microbiol 134: 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.05.021
    [69] Marín A, Tudela JA, Garrido Y, et al. (2020) Chlorinated wash water and pH regulators affect chlorine gas emission and disinfection byproducts. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 66: 102533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102533
    [70] Penteado AL, Castro MFPM, Rezende ACB (2014) Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and Listeria monocytogenes in mango (Mangifera indica L.) pulp: growth, survival and cross-contamination. J Sci Food Agric 99: 2746-2751. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6619
    [71] Lehto M, Kuisma R, Maatta J, et al. (2011) Hygienic level and surface contamination in fresh-cut vegetable production plants. Food Control 22: 469-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.09.029
    [72] Cunault C, Faille C, Calabozo-Delgado A, et al. (2019) Structure and resistance to mechanical stress and enzymatic cleaning of Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms formed in fresh-cut ready to eat washing tanks. J Food Eng 262: 154-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.06.006
    [73] McCollum JT, Cronquist AB, Silk BJ, et al. (2013) Multistate outbreak of listeriosis associated with cantaloupe. N J Engl J Med 369: 944-953. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1215837
    [74] Corbo MR, Campaniello D, D'Amato D, et al. (2005) Behaviour of Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in fresh-sliced cactus-pear fruit. J Food Safe 25: 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4565.2005.00570.x
    [75] Raybaudi-Massilia RM, Mosqueda-Melgar J, Sobrino-Lopez A, et al. (2009) Use of malic acid and other quality stabilizing compounds to assure the safety of fresh-cut “Fuji” apples by inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella Enteritidis and Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Food Safe 29: 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4565.2009.00153.x
    [76] Erickson MC (2012) Internalization of fresh produce by foodborne pathogens. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 3: 283-310. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-food-022811-101211
    [77] Strobel G (2018) The emergence of endophytic microbes and their biological promise. J Fungi 4: 57-76. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4020057
    [78] Gibbs DS, Anderson GL, Beuchat LR, et al. (2005) Potential role of Diploscapter sp. strain LKC25, a bacterivorous nematode from soil, as a vector of food-borne pathogenic bacteria to preharvest fruits and vegetables. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 2433-2437. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.5.2433-2437.2005
    [79] Lim JA, Lee DH, Heu S (2014) The interaction of human enteric pathogens with plants. Plant Pathol 30: 109-116. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.RW.04.2014.0036
    [80] Cools D, Merckx R, Vlassak K, et al. (2001) Survival of E. coli and Enterococcus derived from pig slurry in soils with different texture. Appl Soil Ecol 17: 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(00)00133-5
    [81] López-Gálvez F, Gil MI, Truchado P, et al. (2010) Cross-contamination of fresh-cut lettuce after a short-term exposure during pre-washing cannot be controlled after subsequent washing with chlorine dioxide or sodium hypochlorite. Food Microbiol 27: 199-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2009.09.009
    [82] Holden N, Pritchard L, Toth I (2009) Colonization out with the colon: plants as an alternative environmental reservoir for human pathogenic enterobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33: 689-703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00153.x
    [83] Deering AJ, Mauer LJR, Pruitt RE (2012) Internalization of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella spp. in plants: A review. Food Res Int 45: 567-575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.06.058
    [84] Gautam D, Dobhal S, Peyton ME, et al. (2014) Surface survival and internalization of Salmonella through natural cracks on developing cantaloupe fruits alone or in the presence of the melon wilt Erwinia tracheiphila. PLoS One 9: e105248. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105248
    [85] Chen LQ, Hou B, Lalonde H, et al. (2010) Sugar transporters for intercellular exchange and nutrition of pathogens. Nature 468: 527-532. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09606
    [86] Martínez-Vaz BM, Fink RC, Diez-Gonzalez F, et al. (2014) Enteric pathogen-plant interactions: molecular connections leading to colonization and growth and implications for foin od safety. Microbes Environ 29: 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME13139
    [87] Fatima U, Senthil-Kumar M (2015) Plant and pathogen nutrient acquisition strategies. Front Plant Scien 6: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00750
    [88] Oms-Oliu G, Rojas-Grau MA, Gonzalez LA, et al. (2010) Recent approaches using chemical treatments to preserve quality of fresh-cut fruit: A review. Postharvest Biol Tech 57: 139-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.04.001
    [89] Luo Y, Nou X, Yang Y, et al. (2011) Determination of free chlorine concentrations needed to prevent Escherichia coli O157:H7 cross-contamination during fresh cut produce wash. J Food Prot 24: 352-358. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-10-429
    [90] Beuchat LR (2002) Ecological factors influencing survival and growth of human pathogens on raw fruits and vegetables. Microbes Infect 4: 413-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1286-4579(02)01555-1
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Shi-Yu Chen, Rui-Si Yang, Bai-Quan Ci, Wei-Gang Xin, Qi-Lin Zhang, Lian-Bing Lin, Feng Wang, A novel bacteriocin against multiple foodborne pathogens from Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus isolated from juice ferments: ATF perfusion-based preparation of viable cells, characterization, antibacterial and antibiofilm activity, 2023, 26659271, 100484, 10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100484
    2. Halimatuddahliana Nasution, Hamidah Harahap, Elisa Julianti, Aida Safitri, Mariatti Jaafar, Smart Packaging Based on Polylactic Acid: The Effects of Antibacterial and Antioxidant Agents from Natural Extracts on Physical–Mechanical Properties, Colony Reduction, Perishable Food Shelf Life, and Future Prospective, 2023, 15, 2073-4360, 4103, 10.3390/polym15204103
    3. Ranjan K. Mohapatra, Snehasish Mishra, Lawrence Sena Tuglo, Ashish K. Sarangi, Venkataramana Kandi, Amani Ahmed AL Ibrahim, Hussain A. Alsaif, Ali A. Rabaan, Md. Kudrat‐E Zahan, Recurring food source‐based Listeria outbreaks in the United States: An unsolved puzzle of concern?, 2024, 7, 2398-8835, 10.1002/hsr2.1863
    4. Hossein Meighani, Mohammad Roozkhosh, Effect of melatonin treatment on the quality of minimally-processed pomegranate arils during cold storage, 2024, 18, 2193-4126, 1740, 10.1007/s11694-023-02284-x
    5. Diana Molina, Julio C. Carrión–Olmedo, Pablo Jarrín–V, Gabriela N. Tenea, Genome characterization of a multi-drug resistant Escherichia coli strain, L1PEag1, isolated from commercial cape gooseberry fruits (Physalis peruviana L.), 2024, 15, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1392333
    6. Maratab Ali, Xiuming Zhao, Sarfaraz Hussain, Xiaodong Fu, Durray Shahwar, Xiaoan Li, Fujun Li, Zhang Xinhua, Metagenomic and transcriptome insights into the disease resistance mechanisms in fresh-cut apple under pyridoxine treatment, 2024, 218, 09255214, 113167, 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2024.113167
    7. Ce Shi, Yangyang Chen, Changzhu Li, Fahad Al-Asmari, Haiying Cui, Lin Lin, Potential Application of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum in Food Bio-preservation – A Comprehensive Review with a Focus on the Antibacterial and Anti-Virulence Effects on Foodborne Pathogens , 2024, 40, 8755-9129, 2993, 10.1080/87559129.2024.2317283
    8. Taozhu Sun, Volha Lazouskaya, Yan Jin, Mechanisms of colloid removal from polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) surfaces during washing: Implications for enhanced produce decontamination, 2024, 162, 09567135, 110434, 10.1016/j.foodcont.2024.110434
    9. Ramona Iseppi, Eleonora Truzzi, Carla Sabia, Patrizia Messi, Efficacy and Synergistic Potential of Cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) and Clove (Syzygium aromaticum L. Merr. & Perry) Essential Oils to Control Food-Borne Pathogens in Fresh-Cut Fruits, 2024, 13, 2079-6382, 319, 10.3390/antibiotics13040319
    10. Jan Aleksander Zdulski, Krzysztof P. Rutkowski, Dorota Konopacka, Strategies to Extend the Shelf Life of Fresh and Minimally Processed Fruit and Vegetables with Edible Coatings and Modified Atmosphere Packaging, 2024, 14, 2076-3417, 11074, 10.3390/app142311074
    11. Sueny Andrade Batista, Emanuele Batistela dos Santos, Gabriel Teles Câmara, Ester Cardoso Paes Rose, Pedro Tourinho Dantas, Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho, Verônica Cortez Ginani, Main Barriers in Reducing Microbial Load in Raw Vegetables Served on Brazilian School Menus, 2024, 4, 2673-947X, 527, 10.3390/hygiene4040040
    12. Mike Telemaco Contreras Colmenares, Amanda de Oliveira Matos, Pedro Henrique dos Santos Dantas, José Rodrigues Do Carmo Neto, Bruno Júnior Neves, Luiz Gustavo Araújo Gardinassi, Marcelle Silva-Sales, Helioswilton Sales-Campos, TREM-1 as a Potential Coreceptor in Norovirus Pathogenesis: Insights from Transcriptomic Analysis and Molecular Docking, 2025, 2470-1343, 10.1021/acsomega.4c10220
    13. Adrián Gómez-Baltazar, Cindy Fabiola Hernández-Pérez, Christian Ulises Franco-Frias, Gloria M. Castañeda-Ruelas, Elisa Cabrera-Diaz, Montserrat Hernández-Iturriaga, Genomic diversity and distribution of Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from imported and national fresh produce in Mexico from 2014 to 2018, 2025, 09639969, 116211, 10.1016/j.foodres.2025.116211
    14. B Kusbiantoro, D Fardiaz, A Apriyantono, P Hariyadi, S Budijanto, Edible film as a barrier to durian flavour compounds, 2025, 1477, 1755-1307, 012053, 10.1088/1755-1315/1477/1/012053
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3225) PDF downloads(271) Cited by(14)

Figures and Tables

Figures(2)  /  Tables(2)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog