Research article Special Issues

Risk propagation in heterogeneous supply chain networks with saturated contagion pressure and environmental uncertainty

  • Published: 14 October 2026
  • MSC : 05C82, 37A25, 60H10

  • This paper investigates risk contagion within a heterogeneous supply chain network by formulating a degree-indexed susceptible-infected-recovered-susceptible (SIRS) stochastic dynamical system. The proposed system incorporates nonlinear saturated incidence rates and environmental perturbations to capture the complex interplay between network topology and external uncertainty. We first perform a deterministic analysis, derive the basic reproduction number $\mathcal{R}_0$ using the next-generation matrix approach, and establish stability criteria for both risk-free and endemic risk equilibria. Then, we extend the proposed framework to a stochastic environment by incorporating proportional (multiplicative) noise. Mathematically, we verify the existence and uniqueness of a global positive solution to ensure the system's well-posedness. By constructing Lyapunov functions, we derive stochastic thresholds $ \mathcal{R}_0^s $ and $ \mathcal{R}_0^p $ that dictates the system's asymptotic behavior. Our results show that if $\mathcal{R}_0^s < 1$, the risk may disappear, while when $\mathcal{R}_0^p > 1$, the system converges to a unique ergodic stationary distribution, which means that the risk will continue to exist under a stable probability state. Numerical simulations utilizing the Euler-Maruyama scheme validate these theoretical thresholds and further elucidate the degree-temporal evolution of contagion across the network. The findings suggest that risk managers should transition from traditional deterministic point forecasting toward distribution-based buffering strategies, prioritizing hub-centric resilience interventions to effectively mitigate cascading failures within highly coupled systems.

    Citation: Hui Li, Shufen Wei, Xinyu Ye, Xinze Lian, Feng Rao. Risk propagation in heterogeneous supply chain networks with saturated contagion pressure and environmental uncertainty[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2026, 11(10): 33389-33421. doi: 10.3934/math.20261307

    Related Papers:

  • This paper investigates risk contagion within a heterogeneous supply chain network by formulating a degree-indexed susceptible-infected-recovered-susceptible (SIRS) stochastic dynamical system. The proposed system incorporates nonlinear saturated incidence rates and environmental perturbations to capture the complex interplay between network topology and external uncertainty. We first perform a deterministic analysis, derive the basic reproduction number $\mathcal{R}_0$ using the next-generation matrix approach, and establish stability criteria for both risk-free and endemic risk equilibria. Then, we extend the proposed framework to a stochastic environment by incorporating proportional (multiplicative) noise. Mathematically, we verify the existence and uniqueness of a global positive solution to ensure the system's well-posedness. By constructing Lyapunov functions, we derive stochastic thresholds $ \mathcal{R}_0^s $ and $ \mathcal{R}_0^p $ that dictates the system's asymptotic behavior. Our results show that if $\mathcal{R}_0^s < 1$, the risk may disappear, while when $\mathcal{R}_0^p > 1$, the system converges to a unique ergodic stationary distribution, which means that the risk will continue to exist under a stable probability state. Numerical simulations utilizing the Euler-Maruyama scheme validate these theoretical thresholds and further elucidate the degree-temporal evolution of contagion across the network. The findings suggest that risk managers should transition from traditional deterministic point forecasting toward distribution-based buffering strategies, prioritizing hub-centric resilience interventions to effectively mitigate cascading failures within highly coupled systems.



    加载中


    [1] T. Choi, K. Dooley, M. Ruangtusanathan, Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: control versus emergence, J. Oper. Manag., 19 (2001), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00068-1 doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00068-1
    [2] A. Surana, S. Kumara, M. Greaves, U. Raghavan, Supply-chain networks: a complex adaptive systems perspective, Int. J. Prod. Res., 43 (2005), 4235–4265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500142274 doi: 10.1080/00207540500142274
    [3] Y. Fujiwara, H. Aoyama, Large-scale structure of a nationwide production network, Eur. Phys. J. B, 77 (2010), 565–580. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2010-00275-2 doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2010-00275-2
    [4] A. Pichler, C. Diem, A. Brintrup, F. Lafond, G. Magerman, G. Buiten, et al., Building an alliance to map global supply networks, Science, 382 (2023), 270–272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi7521 doi: 10.1126/science.adi7521
    [5] K. Bae, G. Karolyi, R. Stulz, A new approach to measuring financial contagion, Rev. Financ. Stud., 16 (2003), 717–763. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhg012 doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhg012
    [6] D. Baur, Financial contagion and the real economy, J. Bank. Financ., 36 (2012), 2680–2692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.05.019 doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.05.019
    [7] H. Inoue, Y. Todo, Firm-level propagation of shocks through supply-chain networks, Nat. Sustain., 2 (2019), 841–847. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0351-x doi: 10.1038/s41893-019-0351-x
    [8] C. Diem, A. Borsos, T. Reisch, J. Kertész, S. Thurner, Quantifying firm-level economic systemic risk from nation-wide supply networks, Sci. Rep., 12 (2022), 7719. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11522-z doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11522-z
    [9] B. Demir, B. Javorcik, T. Michalski, E. Ors, Financial constraints and propagation of shocks in production networks, Rev. Econ. Stat., 106 (2024), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01162 doi: 10.1162/rest_a_01162
    [10] C. Diem, A. Borsos, T. Reisch, J. Kertsz, S. Thurner, Estimating the loss of economic predictability from aggregating firm-level production networks, PNAS Nexus, 3 (2024), 064. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae064 doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae064
    [11] D. Ivanov, Structural dynamics and resilience in supply chain risk management, Springer, 2018.
    [12] S. Battiston, S. Martinez-Jaramillo, Financial networks and stress testing: challenges and new research avenues for systemic risk analysis and financial stability implications, J. Financ. Stab., 35 (2018), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2018.03.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jfs.2018.03.010
    [13] J. Wang, H. Zhou, X. Jin, Risk transmission in complex supply chain network with multi-drivers, Chaos Solitons Fract., 143 (2021), 110259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110259 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110259
    [14] N. Hohenstein, Supply chain risk management in the COVID-19 pandemic: strategies and empirical lessons for improving global logistics service providers' performance, Int. J. Logist. Manag., 33 (2022), 1336–1365. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2021-0109 doi: 10.1108/IJLM-02-2021-0109
    [15] A. Świerczek, The impact of supply chain integration on the "snowball effect" in the transmission of disruptions: an empirical evaluation of the model, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 157 (2014), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.08.010 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.08.010
    [16] A. Carro, P. Stupariu, Uncertainty, non-linear contagion and the credit quality channel: an application to the Spanish interbank market, J. Financ. Stab., 71 (2024), 101226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2024.101226 doi: 10.1016/j.jfs.2024.101226
    [17] A. Bernard, E. Dhyne, G. Magerman, K. Manova, A. Moxnes, The origins of firm heterogeneity: a production network approach, J. Polit. Econ., 130 (2022), 1765–1804. https://doi.org/10.1086/719759 doi: 10.1086/719759
    [18] A. Barabási, R. Albert, Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science, 286 (1999), 509–512. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509 doi: 10.1126/science.286.5439.509
    [19] D. Acemoglu, V. Carvalho, A. Ozdaglar, A. Tahbaz-Salehi, The network origins of aggregate fluctuations, Econometrica, 80 (2012), 1977–2016. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA9623 doi: 10.3982/ECTA9623
    [20] N. Osadchiy, V. Gaur, S. Seshadri, Systematic risk in supply chain networks, Manag. Sci., 62 (2015), 1755–1777. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2187 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2187
    [21] S. Wei, Y. Su, Z. Wang, X. Lian, F. Rao, Systemic resilience in heterogeneous supply chains: optimal targeted interventions against risk contagion, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 22 (2026), 2912–2941. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2026107 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2026107
    [22] Y. Chen, Y. Xia, Z. Hua, Risk propagation in supply-chain network considering node heterogeneity, Phys. A, 657 (2025), 130236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2024.130236 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2024.130236
    [23] S. Battiston, Y. Dafermos, I. Monasterolo, Climate risks and financial stability, J. Financ. Stab., 54 (2021), 100867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100867 doi: 10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100867
    [24] Z. Liu, Data-driven two-stage sparse distributionally robust risk optimization model for location allocation problems under uncertain environment, AIMS Math., 8 (2023), 2910–2939. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023152 doi: 10.3934/math.2023152
    [25] Z. Tabachová, C. Diem, A. Borsos, C. Burger, S. Thurner, Estimating the impact of supply chain network contagion on financial stability, J. Financ. Stab., 75 (2024), 101336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2024.101336 doi: 10.1016/j.jfs.2024.101336
    [26] M. Goh, J. Lim, F. Meng, A stochastic model for risk management in global supply chain networks, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 182 (2007), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.08.028 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.08.028
    [27] S. Rezapour, J. Allen, F. Mistree, Uncertainty propagation in a supply chain or supply network, Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., 73 (2015), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2014.10.010 doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2014.10.010
    [28] J. Ma, Q. Hou, Nonlinear dynamics of risk propagation in supply chains: a stochastic SEIR-cellular automaton approach, Nonlinear Dyn., 113 (2025), 28477–28509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-025-11545-x doi: 10.1007/s11071-025-11545-x
    [29] E. Hearnshaw, M. Wilson, A complex network approach to supply chain network theory, Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., 33 (2013), 442–469. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571311307343 doi: 10.1108/01443571311307343
    [30] A. Capponi, P. Chen, Systemic risk mitigation in financial networks, J. Econ. Dyn. Control, 58 (2015), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2015.06.008 doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2015.06.008
    [31] S. Perera, M. Bell, M. Bliemer, Network science approach to modelling the topology and robustness of supply chain networks: a review and perspective, Appl. Netw. Sci., 2 (2017), 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-017-0053-0 doi: 10.1007/s41109-017-0053-0
    [32] T. Reisch, G. Heiler, C. Diem, P. Klimek, S. Thurner, Monitoring supply networks from mobile phone data for estimating the systemic risk of an economy, Sci. Rep., 12 (2022), 13347. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13104-5 doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13104-5
    [33] K. Liu, Y. Xia, C. Xia, H. Tu, Impact of heterogeneity on risk propagation in supply chain networks, Phys. A, 679 (2025), 131021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2025.131021 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2025.131021
    [34] W. Jing, Y. Zhao, J. Zhang, X. Cao, Z. Jin, Impact of heterogeneous vaccination on epidemic dynamics in metapopulation networks, Nonlinear Dyn., 113 (2025), 5923–5937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-024-10542-w doi: 10.1007/s11071-024-10542-w
    [35] Y. Li, C. Zobel, Exploring supply chain network resilience in the presence of the ripple effect, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 228 (2020), 107693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107693 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107693
    [36] Y. Yao, N. Yang, J. Zhai, Y. Huang, Research on propagation models in supply chain risk propagation, 2025 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM63636.2025.11357725
    [37] R. Zhao, Q. Liu, M. Sun, Dynamical behavior of a stochastic SIQS epidemic model on scale-free networks, J. Appl. Math. Comput., 68 (2022), 813–838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-021-01550-9 doi: 10.1007/s12190-021-01550-9
    [38] J. Brogaard, L. Dai, P. Ngo, B. Zhang, Global political uncertainty and asset prices, Rev. Financ. Stud., 33 (2020), 1737–1780. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz087 doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhz087
    [39] R. Pastor-Satorras, A. Vespignani, Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks, Phys. Rev. Lett., 86 (2001), 3200–3203. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3200 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3200
    [40] M. Boguñá, R. Pastor-Satorras, A. Vespignani, Absence of epidemic threshold in scale-free networks with degree correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett., 90 (2003), 028701. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.028701 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.028701
    [41] R. Pastor-Satorras, C. Castellano, P. V. Mieghem, A. Vespignani, Epidemic processes in complex networks, Rev. Mod. Phys., 87 (2015), 925–979. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.87.925 doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.925
    [42] Q. Liu, D. Jiang, N. Shi, T. Hayat, A. Alsaedi, Stationary distribution and extinction of a stochastic SIRS epidemic model with standard incidence, Phys. A, 469 (2017), 510–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.077 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.077
    [43] X. Zhao, J. Shi, Dynamic behavior of a stochastic SIR model with nonlinear incidence and recovery rates, AIMS Math., 8 (2023), 25037–25059. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20231278 doi: 10.3934/math.20231278
    [44] Z. Zhao, X. Zhang, Unraveling the transmission mechanism of animal disease: insight from a stochastic eco-epidemiological model driven by Lévy jumps, Chaos Solitons Fract., 191 (2025), 115859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115859 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115859
    [45] K. Hendricks, V. Singhal, An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on long-run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm, Prod. Oper. Manag., 14 (2005), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00008.x doi: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00008.x
    [46] K. Scheibe, J. Blackhurst, Supply chain disruption propagation: a systemic risk and normal accident theory perspective, Int. J. Prod. Res., 56 (2018), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1355123 doi: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1355123
    [47] P. Glasserman, H. Young, Contagion in financial networks, J. Econ. Lit., 54 (2016), 779–831. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20151228 doi: 10.1257/jel.20151228
    [48] Y. Zhao, D. Jiang, The threshold of a stochastic sirs epidemic model with saturated incidence, Appl. Math. Lett., 34 (2014), 90–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2013.11.002 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2013.11.002
    [49] L. Huo, H. Guo, Y. Cheng, X. Xie, A new model for supply chain risk propagation considering herd mentality and risk preference under warning information on multiplex networks, Phys. A, 545 (2020), 123506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.123506 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.123506
    [50] X. Mao, Stochastic differential equations and applications, 2 Eds., Academic Press, 2008.
    [51] R. Khasminskii, Stochastic stability of differential equations, 2 Eds., Springer, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23280-0
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Metrics

Article views(47) PDF downloads(10) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog