
This article is devoted to studying a new class of nonlinear coupled systems of fractional differential equations supplemented with nonlocal integro-coupled boundary conditions and affected by infinite delay. We first transform the boundary value problem into a fixed-point problem, and, with the aid of the theory of infinite delay, we assume an appropriate phase space to deal with the obtained problem. Then, the existence result of solutions to the given system is investigated by employing Schaefer's fixed-point theorem, while the uniqueness result is established in view of the Banach contraction mapping principle. The illustrative examples are constructed to ensure the availability of the main results.
Citation: Madeaha Alghanmi, Shahad Alqurayqiri. Existence results for a coupled system of nonlinear fractional functional differential equations with infinite delay and nonlocal integral boundary conditions[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 15040-15059. doi: 10.3934/math.2024729
[1] | Weerawat Sudsutad, Chatthai Thaiprayoon, Sotiris K. Ntouyas . Existence and stability results for ψ-Hilfer fractional integro-differential equation with mixed nonlocal boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 4119-4141. doi: 10.3934/math.2021244 |
[2] | Subramanian Muthaiah, Dumitru Baleanu, Nandha Gopal Thangaraj . Existence and Hyers-Ulam type stability results for nonlinear coupled system of Caputo-Hadamard type fractional differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 168-194. doi: 10.3934/math.2021012 |
[3] | Subramanian Muthaiah, Manigandan Murugesan, Muath Awadalla, Bundit Unyong, Ria H. Egami . Ulam-Hyers stability and existence results for a coupled sequential Hilfer-Hadamard-type integrodifferential system. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 16203-16233. doi: 10.3934/math.2024784 |
[4] | Najla Alghamdi, Bashir Ahmad, Esraa Abed Alharbi, Wafa Shammakh . Investigation of multi-term delay fractional differential equations with integro-multipoint boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 12964-12981. doi: 10.3934/math.2024632 |
[5] | Arjumand Seemab, Mujeeb ur Rehman, Jehad Alzabut, Yassine Adjabi, Mohammed S. Abdo . Langevin equation with nonlocal boundary conditions involving a ψ-Caputo fractional operators of different orders. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 6749-6780. doi: 10.3934/math.2021397 |
[6] | Murugesan Manigandan, Kannan Manikandan, Hasanen A. Hammad, Manuel De la Sen . Applying fixed point techniques to solve fractional differential inclusions under new boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 15505-15542. doi: 10.3934/math.2024750 |
[7] | Nichaphat Patanarapeelert, Jiraporn Reunsumrit, Thanin Sitthiwirattham . On nonlinear fractional Hahn integrodifference equations via nonlocal fractional Hahn integral boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 35016-35037. doi: 10.3934/math.20241667 |
[8] | Ugyen Samdrup Tshering, Ekkarath Thailert, Sotiris K. Ntouyas . Existence and stability results for a coupled system of Hilfer-Hadamard sequential fractional differential equations with multi-point fractional integral boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 25849-25878. doi: 10.3934/math.20241263 |
[9] | Ayub Samadi, Chaiyod Kamthorncharoen, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, Jessada Tariboon . Mixed Erdélyi-Kober and Caputo fractional differential equations with nonlocal non-separated boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 32904-32920. doi: 10.3934/math.20241574 |
[10] | Mona Alsulami . Existence theory for a third-order ordinary differential equation with non-separated multi-point and nonlocal Stieltjes boundary conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 13572-13592. doi: 10.3934/math.2023689 |
This article is devoted to studying a new class of nonlinear coupled systems of fractional differential equations supplemented with nonlocal integro-coupled boundary conditions and affected by infinite delay. We first transform the boundary value problem into a fixed-point problem, and, with the aid of the theory of infinite delay, we assume an appropriate phase space to deal with the obtained problem. Then, the existence result of solutions to the given system is investigated by employing Schaefer's fixed-point theorem, while the uniqueness result is established in view of the Banach contraction mapping principle. The illustrative examples are constructed to ensure the availability of the main results.
For thousands of years throughout history, mathematicians, philosophers, and scientists have studied the surface idea. In the process, differential geometry's advancements have substantially strengthened the theory of surfaces. The pioneers in this field of study were Gauss, Riemann, and Poincare, but Monge also made some important contributions to the study of surfaces. Surfaces are represented as graphs of functions of two variables according to Monge's methodology.
A surface that can be created by moving a straight line along a spatial curve is a ruled surface [1,2]. Since they have relatively simple features and enable us to analyze intricate surfaces, ruled surfaces are recommended for study. Among the main topics of research on ruled surfaces are their classification, features attributed to the base curve, geodesics, shape operators of surfaces, and the study of developable and non-developable ruled surfaces.
Since the Lorentzian metric is not a positive definite metric, the differential geometry of ruled surfaces in the Minkowski 3-space E31 is far more complex than in the Euclidean event. In contrast to the distance function in Euclidean space, which may only be positive, the distance function ⟨,⟩ can be positive, negative, or zero.
Similar properties may be seen in the Euclidean space when ruled surfaces in the Minkowski space are surveyed, but the structure of the Minkowski space leads to some fascinating contrasts. Ruled surfaces in Minkowski space have more complicated geometry than those in Euclidean space, since their characterization is dependent on both the direction and the base curve. Regulated surfaces can be categorized as developable or non-developable, as is currently understood [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16].
A Darboux frame is a natural moving frame constructed on a surface; it is the analog of the Frenet-Serret frame as applied to surface geometry. A Darboux frame exists at any non-umbilic point of a surface embedded in the Euclidean space [17,18].
The aim of this study is to develop a brand-new frame called the rotation-minimizing Darboux frame (RMDF), which travels along a spacelike curve that entirely encircles a timelike surface in the coordinate system E31. We also demonstrate how to use RMDF to create imbricate-ruled surfaces in Minkowski 3-space using the vectors of the Frenet frame of non-null space curves. Next, depending on the curvatures of the base curve, requirements are simultaneously given for each imbricate-ruled surface to be minimal or developable. Asymptotic, geodesic, and curvature lines are examples of parametric curves that are characterized by these requirements. An example concerning imbricate-ruled surfaces are given at the conclusion of the inquiry.
The definition of the Lorentzian product in Minkowski three-dimensional space E31 is
L=−ds21+ds22+ds23, |
where (s1,s2,s3) is E31's coordinate system. The characteristics of an arbitrary vector ζ∈E31 are as follows: spacelike if L(ζ,ζ)>0 or ζ=0, timelike if L(ζ,ζ)<0, and null if L(ζ,ζ)=0 and ζ≠0. Similarly, a curve μ=μ(s) can be spacelike, timelike, or null if its μ′(s) is spacelike, timelike, or null. The vector product of vectors u=(u1,u2,u3) and v=(v1,v2,v3) in E31 is defined by [18,19]
u×v=(u3v2−u2v3,u3v1−u1v3,u1v2−u2v1). |
Consider a timelike embedding Θ:U→E31 from open subset U∈E2 represented by a regular timelike surface Θ(s,u). The Θ's tangent vectors are
Θs=∂Θ∂s,Θu=∂Θ∂u. |
The unit normal vector to Θ given as
N=Θs×Θu‖Θs×Θu‖. | (2.1) |
The coefficient of first and second fundamental forms given as:
E=⟨Θs,Θs⟩,F=⟨Θs,Θu⟩,G=⟨Θu,Θu⟩,e=⟨N,Θss⟩,f=⟨N,Θsu⟩,g=⟨N,Θuu⟩. | (2.2) |
The Gaussian and mean curvatures are defined as:
K(s,u)=eg−f2EG−F2,H(s,u)=Eg−2Ff+Ge2(EG−F2). | (2.3) |
Let ϕ:I⊆R→Θ is a regular spacelike curve with timelike binormal on Θ. Denoted {T,N,B} be the moving Frenet frame of ϕ, then {T,N,B} has the following properties: [1,18,19,20]:
T′(s)=κ(s)N(s),N′(s)=−κ(s)T(s)+τ(s)B(s),B′(s)=τ(s)N(s), | (2.4) |
where (′=dds), L(T,T)=L(N,N)=−L(B,B)=1, L(T,N)=L(N,B)=L(T,B)=0 and κ(s), and τ(s) are the curvature functions of ϕ. For the unit vector P defined by P=N×T, the Darboux frame {T,N,P} associated with ϕ(s) in E31 satisfying the equations [1,18]:
T′(s)=κg(s)N(s)+κn(s)P(s),N′(s)=−κg(s)T(s)+τg(s)P(s),P′(s)=κn(s)T(s)+τg(s)N(s), | (2.5) |
where L(T,T)=L(N,N)=−L(P,P)=1 and L(T,N)=L(T,P)=L(N,P)=0. Here, the normal curvature κn(s), the geodesic curvature κg(s), and the geodesic curve τg(s) of ϕ can be obtained as follows:
κn(s)=⟨ϕ″,P⟩,κg(s)=⟨ϕ″,N⟩,τg(s)=−⟨P,N′⟩. | (2.6) |
It is well known that the Frenet frame along a space curve on a surface is the source of the Bishop frame. In this section, by the same way we develop a brand-new alternative of the Darboux frame known as the (RMDF) on a surface in Minkowski 3-space along a space curve. Next, we get the intrinsic equations resulting from the RMDF for a generalized relaxed elastic line situated on an orientated surface. Let ϕ=ϕ(s) be a regular spacelike curve moving at unit speed that has a timelike binormal vector entirely affixed to a timelike surface Ψ in E31 through a Darboux frame (2.5). Let's use the notation {T,V1,V2} to denote an RMDF. A brief calculation demonstrates that
V1(s)=coshθ(s)N(s)+sinhθ(s)P(s),V2(s)=sinhθ(s)N(s)+coshθ(s)P(s). | (3.1) |
Differentiate (3.1) with respect to s and using (2.5), we have
V′1(s)=−(κg(s)coshθ(s)−κn(s)sinhθ(s))T(s)+(τg(s)+θ′(s))V2(s),V′2(s)=(−κg(s)sinhθ(s)+κn(s)coshθ(s))T(s)+(τg(s)+θ′(s))V2(s). |
The equalities (3.1), on the other hand, are obtained by combining
T′(s)=κg(s)N(s)+κn(s)P(s). |
Then, we get
T′(s)=(κg(s)coshθ(s)−κn(s)sinhθ(s))V1(s)+(−κg(s)sinhθ(s)+κn(s)coshθ(s))V2(s). |
The derivative with respect to s produces the frame similarly to the previous frames:
T′(s)=(κg(s)coshθ(s)−κn(s)sinhθ(s))V1(s)+(−κg(s)sinhθ(s)+κn(s)coshθ(s))V2(s),V′1(s)=−(κg(s)coshθ(s)−κn(s)sinhθ(s))T(s)+(τg(s)+θ′(s))V2(s),V′2(s)=(−κg(s)sinhθ(s)+κn(s)coshθ(s))T(s)+(τg(s)+θ′(s))V2(s). |
Assume τg(s)=−θ′(s), the RMDF's variation formula is given in the accompanying statement, which reads as follows:
Theorem 3.1. Let ϕ=ϕ(s) be a spacelike curve lying fully on a timelike surface Ψ space E31 via to Darboux frame (2.5). Then, the RMDF {T,V1,V2} is given by
T′(s)=ξ1(s)V1(s)+ξ2(s)V2(s),V′1(s)=−ξ1(s)T(s),V′2(s)=ξ2(s)T(s), | (3.2) |
where ξ1 and ξ2 are RMDF's curvatures that are obtained by the relation:
ξ1(s)=κg(s)coshθ(s)−κn(s)sinhθ(s),ξ2(s)=−κg(s)sinhθ(s)+κn(s)coshθ(s). | (3.3) |
The angle θ(s) between N and V1 is given by
θ(s)=−∫s0τgds, |
also, we have the relation
ξ21−ξ22=κ2g−κ2n. | (3.4) |
Corollary 3.1. Let ϕ=ϕ(s) be a spacelike curve lying fully on a timelike surface Ψ in space E31 via to RMDF (3.2). If ϕ(s) is an asymptotic curve, then ξ1 and ξ2 satisfy
cothθ(s)=−ξ1(s)ξ2(s). | (3.5) |
Corollary 3.2. Let ϕ=ϕ(s) be a spacelike curve lying fully on a timelike surface Ψ in space E31 via to RMDF (3.2). If RMDF's curvatures are constants on a geodesic or asymptotic, then τg(s)=−θ′(s)=0 and ϕ(s) will be a principal curve.
This section examines specific imbricate-ruled surfaces as an application of the RMDF in the Minkowski 3-space E31 for a given timelike surface and a spacelike curve completely resting on it. We anticipate that researchers with competence in mathematical modeling will find our findings to be valuable.
Definition 4.1. For a regular spacelike curve ϕ=ϕ(s) with timelike binormal vector and lying fully on a timelike surface Ψ in E31. The TV1-imbricate-ruled surfaces via RMDF (3.2) of ϕ(s) are defined by
ΦTV1(s,υ)=T(s)+υV1(s),ΦV1T(s,υ)=V1(s)+υT(s). | (4.1) |
Theorem 4.1. Let ϕ=ϕ(s) be a unit speed spacelike curve lying fully on a timelike surface Ψ in E31 via to RMDF (3.2). Then TV1-imbricate-ruled surfaces (4.1) are developable surfaces.
Proof. Using (3.2), we obtained the first and second partial derivatives in the first equation (4.1) with regard to s and υ, we get
(ΦTV1)s=−υξ1T(s)+ξ1V1(s)+ξ2V2(s),(ΦTV1)υ=−ξ1T(s). | (4.2) |
(ΦTV1)ss=−[ξ21−υξ′1]T(s)+[ξ′1−υξ21]V1(s)+[ξ′2−ξ2(υξ1−ξ2)]V2(s),(ΦTV1)sυ=−ξ1T(s),(ΦTV1)υυ=0. | (4.3) |
The normal vector field of the surface ΦTV1(s,υ) may be ascertained by taking the cross-product of the partial derivatives of the surface given by Eq (4.2)
UTV1=(ΦTV1)s×(ΦTV1)υ‖(ΦTV1)s×(ΦTV1)υ‖=ξ2V1(s)+ξ1V2(s)√|ξ22−ξ21|. |
With the aforementioned equation, we can obtain the first and second fundamental forms of ΦTV1's component parts as follows:
ETV1=υ2ξ21+κ2,FTV1=υξ21,GTV1=ξ21. | (4.4) |
eTV1=ξ2(ξ′1−υξ21)−ξ2[ξ′2−ξ2(υξ1−ξ2)]√|ξ22−ξ21|,fTV1=0,gTV1=0. | (4.5) |
The Gaussian curvature KTV1 and the mean curvature HTV1 are determined using the data mentioned above:
KTV1=0,HTV1=ξ21[ξ2(ξ′1−υξ21)−ξ2[ξ′2−ξ2(υξ1−ξ2)]]√|ξ22−ξ21|[(υ3−1)ξ21+κ2]. | (4.6) |
However, by applying the RMDF (3.2) and differentiating the second equation in (4.1) with regard to s and υ to get the first and second partial derivatives, we obtain
(ΦV1T)s=−ξ1T(s)+υξ1V1(s)+υξ2V2(s),(ΦV1T)υ=−ξ1T(s). | (4.7) |
The normal vector field of the surface ΦV1T(s,υ) is determined as follows:
UV1T=ξ2V1(s)−ξ21V2(s)√|ξ22−ξ21|. |
(ΦV1T)ss=[υκ2−ξ′1]T(s)+[υξ′1−ξ′1]V1(s)+[υξ′2−ξ1ξ2]V2(s),(ΦV1T)sυ=ξ1V1(s)+ξ2V2(s),(ΦV1T)υυ=0. | (4.8) |
The ΦV1T's component of the first and second fundamental forms are obtained as:
EV1T=ξ21+υ2κ2,FV1T=−ξ1,GV1T=1. | (4.9) |
eV1T=ξ2(υξ′1−ξ21)+ξ1(υξ′2−ξ1ξ2)√|ξ22−ξ21|,fV1T=0,gV1T=0. | (4.10) |
So, the Gaussian curvature and the mean curvature are given by
KV1T=0,HV1T=ξ2(υξ′1−ξ21)+ξ1(υξ′2−ξ1ξ2)2υ2κ2√|ξ22−ξ21|. | (4.11) |
Corollary 4.1. Let ϕ=ϕ(s) be a unit speed spacelike curve lying fully on a timelike surface Ψ in E31 via to RMDF (3.2). Then the s-parameter curves of TV1-imbricate-ruled surfaces (4.1) are
ⅰ. not geodesic,
ⅱ. asymptotic curves iff θ(s)=tanh−1(κgκn) or θ(s)=tanh−1(κnκg).
Proof. Let ΦTV1(s,υ) defined by (4.1) due to RMDF (3.2) in E31 be imbricate-ruled surface. Since
(ΦTV1)ss×UTV1=1√|ξ22−ξ21|{ξ2[ξ′2−ξ2(υξ1−ξ2)]−ξ1(ξ′1−υξ21)+(ξ1−ξ2)(ξ21−υξ′1)}, |
and
(ΦV1T)ss×UV1T=1√|ξ22−ξ21|{ξ2(υξ′2−ξ1ξ2)+ξ1(υξ′1−ξ21)+(ξ1+ξ2)(υκ2−ξ′1)}. |
Since (ΦTV1)ss×UTV1≠0 and (ΦV1T)ss×UV1T≠0, then s-parameter curves of TV1-imbricate-ruled surfaces are not geodesic. Now
⟨(ΦTV1)ss,UTV1⟩=ξ′1ξ2−ξ1ξ′2+ξ1ξ22√|ξ22−ξ21|, |
and
⟨(ΦV1T)ss,UV1T⟩=υ(ξ′1ξ2+ξ1ξ′2)−2ξ21ξ2√|ξ22−ξ21|. |
From here, if ξ1=0 and ξ2≠0 or ξ1≠0 and ξ2=0, then ⟨(ΦTV1)ss,UTV1⟩=0 and ⟨(ΦV1T)ss,UV1T⟩=0. So the s-parameter curves of TV1-imbricate-ruled surfaces are asymptotic curves iff θ(s)=tanh−1(κgκn) or θ(s)=tanh−1(κnκg).
Corollary 4.2. Let ϕ=ϕ(s) be a unit speed spacelike curve lying fully on a timelike surface Ψ in E31 via to RMDF (3.2). Then the υ-parameter curves of TV1-imbricate-ruled surfaces (4.1) are
ⅰ. geodesic,
ⅱ. asymptotic curves.
Proof. Let ΦTV1(s,υ) defined by (4.1) due to RMDF (3.2) in E31 be an imbricate-ruled surface. Since (ΦTV1)υ×UTV1=0 and (ΦV1T)υυ×UV1T=0, then the υ-parameter curves of TV1-imbricate-ruled surfaces are geodesic. Also, since ⟨(ΦTV1)υυ,UTV1⟩=0 and ⟨(ΦV1T)υυ,UV1T⟩=0, then the υ-parameter curves of TV1-imbricate-ruled surfaces are asymptotic curves.
Corollary 4.3. Let ϕ=ϕ(s) be a unit speed spacelike curve lying fully on a timelike surface Ψ in E31 via to RMDF (3.2). Then the s and υ-parameter curves of TV1-imbricate-ruled surfaces (4.1) are principal curves if and only if ξ1=0.
Proof. Let ΦTV1(s,υ) defined by (4.1) due to RMDF (3.2) in E31 be an imbricate-ruled surface. From equations (4.4), (4.5), (4.9) and (4.10), we have
FTV1=fTV1=FV1T=fV1T=0, |
for ξ1=0, thus, the proof is completed.
Definition 4.2. For a regular spacelike curve ϕ=ϕ(s) with timelike binormal vector and lying fully on a timelike surface Ψ in E31. The TV2-imbricate-ruled surfaces via RMDF (3.2) of ϕ(s) are defined by
ΦTV2(s,υ)=T(s)+υV2(s),ΦV2T(s,υ)=V2(s)+υT(s). | (4.12) |
Theorem 4.2. Let ϕ=ϕ(s) be a unit speed spacelike curve lying fully on a timelike surface Ψ in E31 via to RMDF (3.2). Then TV2-imbricate-ruled surfaces (4.12) are developable and minimal surfaces iff θ(s)=tanh−1(κgκn) or θ(s)=tanh−1(κnκg).
Proof. Using (3.2) and differentiating the first Eq (4.12) with regard to s and υ, we get
(ΦTV2)s=υξ2T(s)+ξ1V2(s)+ξ2V2(s),(ΦTV2)υ=V2(s). | (4.13) |
(ΦTV2)ss=[υξ′2+κ2]T(s)+[ξ′1+υξ1ξ2]V2(s)+[ξ′2+υξ22]V2(s),(ΦTV2)sυ=ξ2T(s),(ΦTV2)υυ=0. | (4.14) |
The normal vector field of the surface ΦTV2(s,υ) is obtained as:
UTV2=−ξ2T(s)+υξ2V1(s)ξ21+υ2ξ22. |
With the aforementioned equation, we can obtain the first and second fundamental forms of ΦTV2's component parts as follows:
ETV2=υ2ξ22+κ2,FTV2=−ξ2,GTV2=−1. | (4.15) |
eTV2=υξ2(ξ′1+υξ1ξ2)−ξ1(υξ′2+κ2)√ξ21+υ2ξ22,fTV2=−ξ1ξ2√ξ21+υ2ξ22,gTV2=0. | (4.16) |
The Gaussian curvature KTV2 and the mean curvature HTV2 are determined using the data mentioned above:
KTV2=ξ21ξ22(ξ21+υ2ξ22)2,HTV2=υξ2(ξ′1+υξ1ξ2)−ξ1(υξ′2+κ2)−ξ1ξ222(ξ21+υ2ξ22)32. | (4.17) |
However, by applying the RMDF (3.2) and differentiating the second equation in (4.12) with regard to s and υ, respectively, we obtain
(ΦV2T)s=ξ2T(s)+υξ1V1(s)+υξ2V2(s),(ΦV2T)υ=T(s). | (4.18) |
(ΦV2T)ss=[ξ′2+υκ2]T(s)+[υξ′1+ξ1ξ2]V1(s)+[υξ′2+ξ22]V2(s),(ΦV2T)sυ=ξ1V1(s)+ξ2V2(s),(ΦV2T)υυ=0. | (4.19) |
The normal vector field of the surface ΦV2T(s,υ) is obtained as:
UV2T(s,υ)=ξ2V1(s)−ξ2V2(s)√|ξ22−ξ21|. |
The ΦV2T's component of the first and second fundamental forms are obtained as:
EV2T=ξ22−υ2κ2,FV2T=ξ2,GV2T=1. | (4.20) |
eV2T=ξ2(υξ′1+ξ1ξ2)−ξ1(υξ′2+ξ22)√|ξ22−ξ21|,fV2T=0,gV2T=0. | (4.21) |
So, the Gaussian curvature and the mean curvature are given by
KV2T=0,HV2T=ξ2(υξ′1+ξ1ξ2)−ξ1(υξ′2+ξ22)2υ2κ2√|ξ22−ξ21|. | (4.22) |
For ξ1=0 and ξ2≠0 or ξ1≠0 and ξ2=0 the proof is completed.
As a consequence of Theorem 4.2, we obtain the following results:
Corollary 4.4. Let ϕ=ϕ(s) be a unit speed spacelike curve lying fully on a timelike surface Ψ in E31 via to RMDF (3.2). Then the s-parameter curves of TV2-imbricate-ruled surfaces (4.12) are not geodesic and asymptotic curves.
Corollary 4.5. Let ϕ=ϕ(s) be a unit speed spacelike curve lying fully on a timelike surface Ψ in E31 via to RMDF (3.2). Then the υ-parameter curves of TV2-imbricate-ruled surfaces (4.12) are geodesic and asymptotic curves.
Corollary 4.6. Let ϕ=ϕ(s) be a unit speed spacelike curve lying fully on a timelike surface Ψ in E31 via to RMDF (3.2). Then the s and υ-parameter curves of TV2-imbricate-ruled surfaces (4.12) are principal cuves iff θ(s)=tanh−1(κnκg) or θ(s)=tanh−1(κgκn).
Remark 4.1. The proof of Corollaries 4.4–4.6 is similar to the proof of Corollaries 4.1–4.3.
Definition 4.3. For a regular spacelike curve ϕ=ϕ(s) with timelike binormal vector and lying fully on a timelike surface Ψ in E31. The V1V2-imbricate-ruled surfaces via RMDF (3.2) of ϕ(s) are defined by
ΦV1V2(s,υ)=V1(s)+υV2(s),ΦV2V1(s,υ)=V2(s)+υV1(s). | (4.23) |
Theorem 4.3. Let ϕ=ϕ(s) be a unit speed spacelike curve lying fully on a timelike surface Ψ in E31 via to RMDF (3.2). Then V1V2-imbricate-ruled surfaces (4.23) are developable surfaces.
Proof. Using (3.2) and differentiating the first Eq (4.23) with regard to s and υ, we get
(ΦV1V2)s=−(ξ1−υξ2)T(s),(ΦV1V2)υ=V2(s). | (4.24) |
(ΦV1V2)ss=(υξ′2−ξ′1)T(s)+ξ1(υξ2−ξ1)V1(s)+ξ2(υξ2−ξ1)V2(s),(ΦV1V2)sυ=ξ2T(s),(ΦV1V2)υυ=0. | (4.25) |
The normal vector field of the surface ΦV1V2(s,υ) is obtained as:
UV1V2(s,υ)=−V1(s). |
With the aforementioned equation, we can obtain the first and second fundamental forms of ΦV1V2's component parts as follows:
EV1V2=(ξ1−υξ2)2,FV1V2=0,GV1V2=−1. | (4.26) |
eV1V2=ξ1(ξ1−υξ2),fV1V2=0,gV1V2=0. | (4.27) |
The Gaussian curvature KV1V2 and the mean curvature HV1V2 are determined using the data mentioned above:
KV1V2=0,HV1V2=ξ12(ξ1−υξ2). | (4.28) |
However, by applying the RMDF (3.2) and differentiating the second equation in (4.23) with regard to s and υ, respectively, we obtain
(ΦV2V1)s=(ξ2−υξ1)T(s),(ΦV2V1)υ=V1(s). | (4.29) |
(ΦV2V1)ss=(ξ′2−υξ′1)T(s)+ξ1(ξ2−υξ1)V1(s)+ξ2(ξ2−υξ1)V1(s),(ΦV2V1)sυ=−ξ1T(s),(ΦV2V1)υυ=0. | (4.30) |
The normal vector field of the surface ΦV2V1(s,υ) is obtained as:
UV2V1(s,υ)=V2(s). |
The ΦV2V1's component of the first and second fundamental forms are obtained as:
EV2V1=(ξ2−υξ1)2,FV2V1=0,GV2V1=1. | (4.31) |
eV2V1=−(ξ2−υξ1),fV2V1=0,gV2V1=0. | (4.32) |
So, the Gaussian curvature and the mean curvature are given by
KV2V1=0,HV2V1=−12(ξ2−υξ1). | (4.33) |
Corollary 4.7. Let ϕ=ϕ(s) be a unit speed spacelike curve lying fully on a timelike surface Ψ in E31 via to RMDF (3.2). Then, V1V2-imbricate-ruled surfaces (4.23) have constant mean curvature iff
ⅰ. ξ1ξ2=2υc2c−1 for some non-zero constant c≠12,
ⅱ. ξ2−υξ1=c for some non-zero constant c.
Corollary 4.8. Let ϕ=ϕ(s) be a unit speed spacelike curve lying fully on a timelike surface Ψ in E31 via to RMDF (3.2). Then υ-parameter curves of V1V2-imbricate-ruled surfaces (4.23) are geodesic curves iff one of the following conditions holds
ⅰ. θ(s)=tanh−1(κnκg) and ξ1 is non-zero constant,
ⅱ. θ(s)=tanh−1(κgκn) and ξ2 is non-zero constant.
Corollary 4.9. Let ϕ=ϕ(s) be a unit speed spacelike curve lying fully on a timelike surface Ψ in E31 via to RMDF (3.2). Then υ-parameter curves of V1V2-imbricate-ruled surfaces (4.23) are asymptotic curves iff one of the following conditions holds
ⅰ. θ(s)=tanh−1(κgκn) and ξ2=υξ1,
ⅱ. θ(s)=tanh−1(κnκg) and ξ1=υξ2.
Corollary 4.10. Let ϕ=ϕ(s) be a unit speed spacelike curve lying fully on a timelike surface Ψ in E31 via to RMDF (3.2). Then the υ-parameter curves of V1V2-imbricate-ruled surfaces (4.23) are geodesic and asymptotic curves.
Corollary 4.11. Let ϕ=ϕ(s) be a unit speed spacelike curve lying fully on a timelike surface Ψ in E31 via to RMDF (3.2). Then the s and υ-parameter curves of V1V2-imbricate-ruled surfaces (4.23) are principal cuves.
Take into account that a spacelike curve with timelike binomal vector in E31 parameterized ϕ(s)=(coshs,sinhs,0) lying fully on a timelike ruled surface is given by the equation (see Figure 1)
Θ(s,υ)=(coshu−υ√2sinhu,sinhu+υ√2coshu,υ√2). |
So, the Darboux frame of φ can be written as:
T(s)=(coshs,sinhs,0),N(s)=(0,0,1),P(s)=(coshs,sinhs,0). |
Then, we have
κn=1,κg=τg=0. |
Then θ(s)=θ0 is a constant. Moreover,
V1(s)=(coshssinhθ0,sinhssinhθ0,coshθ0),V2(s)=(coshscoshθ0,sinhscoshθ0,sinhθ0). |
Consequently, the parametric of imbricate-ruled surfaces can be given as (see Figures 2–4):
ΦV1T=(sinhs+υcoshssinhθ0,coshs+υsinhssinhθ0,υcoshθ0),ΦTV1=(coshssinhθ0+υsinhs,sinhssinhθ0+υcoshs,coshθ0). |
ΦV2T=(sinhs+υcoshscoshθ0,coshs+υsinhscoshθ0,υsinhθ0),ΦTV2=(coshscoshθ0+υsinhs,sinhscoshθ0+υcoshs,sinhθ0). |
ΦV2V1=(coshssinhθ0+υcoshscoshθ0,sinhssinhθ0+υsinhscoshθ0,coshθ0+υsinhθ0),ΦV1V2=(coshscoshθ0+υcoshssinhθ0,sinhscoshθ0+υsinhssinhθ0,sinhθ0+υcoshθ0). |
Recently, numerous researchers have used the Bishop frame and Darboux frame to investigate curves and surfaces, just as they did with the Frenet frame. Recently, the idea of a B-Darboux frame was demonstrated; further investigation may be conducted in the future. The RMDF that we develop in this paper travels along a spacelike curve that fully encircles a timelike surface in E31. We also demonstrate how to use RMDF on imbricate-ruled surfaces.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
This work was supported and funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU) (grant number IMSIU-RG23085).
The authors declare no competing interest.
[1] |
A. Carvalho, C. M. A. Pinto, A delay fractional order model for the co-infection of malaria and HIV/AIDS, Int. J. Dynam. Control, 5 (2017), 168–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-016-0224-3 doi: 10.1007/s40435-016-0224-3
![]() |
[2] |
N. H. Sweilam, S. M. Al-Mekhlafi, Z. N. Mohammed, D. Baleanu, Optimal control for variable order fractional HIV/AIDS and malaria mathematical models with multi-time delay, Alex. Eng. J., 59 (2020), 3149–3162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.07.021 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.07.021
![]() |
[3] |
C. Lu, J. Chen, X. Fan, L. Zhang, Dynamics and simulations of a stochastic predator-prey model with infinite delay and impulsive perturbations, J. Appl. Math. Comput., 57 (2018), 437–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-017-1114-3 doi: 10.1007/s12190-017-1114-3
![]() |
[4] |
S. Pati, J. R. Graef, S. Padhi, Positive periodic solutions to a system of nonlinear differential equations with applications to Lotka-Volterra-type ecological models with discrete and distributed delays, J. Fixed Point Theory Appl., 21 (2019), 80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11784-019-0715-x doi: 10.1007/s11784-019-0715-x
![]() |
[5] |
Z. S. Aghayan, A. Alfi, A. M. Lopes, LMI-based delayed output feedback controller design for a class of fractional-order neutral-type delay systems using guaranteed cost control approach, Entropy, 24 (2022), 1496. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24101496 doi: 10.3390/e24101496
![]() |
[6] |
M. S. Ali, G. Narayanan, V. Shekher, A. Alsaedi, B. Ahmad, Global Mittag-Leffler stability analysis of impulsive fractional-order complex-valued BAM neural networks with time varying delays, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 83 (2020), 105088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2019.105088 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2019.105088
![]() |
[7] |
K. Cui, J. Lu, C. Li, Z. He, Y. M. Chu, Almost sure synchronization criteria of neutral-type neural networks with Lévy noise and sampled-data loss via event-triggered control, Neurocomputing, 325 (2019), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.10.013 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.10.013
![]() |
[8] |
B. Ghanbari, A fractional system of delay differential equation with nonsingular kernels in modeling hand-foot-mouth disease, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2020 (2020), 536. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02993-3 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-02993-3
![]() |
[9] |
L. Hu, S. Zhang, Existence results for a coupled system of fractional differential equations with p-Laplacian operator and infinite-point boundary conditions, Bound. Value Probl., 2017 (2017), 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-017-0819-4 doi: 10.1186/s13661-017-0819-4
![]() |
[10] |
W. Zhang, W. Liu, T. Xue, Existence and uniqueness results for the coupled systems of implicit fractional differential equations with periodic boundary conditions, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2018 (2018), 413. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-018-1867-5 doi: 10.1186/s13662-018-1867-5
![]() |
[11] |
A. M. A. El-Sayed, S. A. Abd El-Salam, Coupled system of a fractional order differential equations with weighted initial conditions, Open Math., 17 (2019), 1737–1749. https://doi.org/10.1515/math-2019-0120 doi: 10.1515/math-2019-0120
![]() |
[12] |
B. Ahmad, M. Alghanmi, A. Alsaedi, Existence results for a nonlinear coupled system involving both Caputo and Riemann-Liouville generalized fractional derivatives and coupled integral boundary conditions, Rocky Mountain J. Math., 50 (2020), 1901–1922. https://doi.org/10.1216/rmj.2020.50.1901 doi: 10.1216/rmj.2020.50.1901
![]() |
[13] |
S. Aljoudi, Existence and uniqueness results for coupled system of fractional differential equations with exponential kernel derivatives, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 590–606. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023027 doi: 10.3934/math.2023027
![]() |
[14] |
K. Zhao, Generalized UH-stability of a nonlinear fractional coupling (p1,p2)-Laplacian system concerned with nonsingular Atangana-Baleanu fractional calculus, J. Inequal. Appl., 2023 (2023), 96. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-023-03010-3 doi: 10.1186/s13660-023-03010-3
![]() |
[15] |
M. Alghanmi, R. P. Agarwal, B. Ahmad, Existence of solutions for a coupled system of nonlinear implicit differential equations involving ϱ-fractional derivative with anti periodic boundary conditions, Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst., 23 (2024), 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12346-023-00861-5 doi: 10.1007/s12346-023-00861-5
![]() |
[16] |
K. Zhao, Study on the stability and its simulation algorithm of a nonlinear impulsive ABC-fractional coupled system with a Laplacian operator via F-contractive mapping, Adv. Cont. Discr. Mod., 2024 (2024), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-024-03801-y doi: 10.1186/s13662-024-03801-y
![]() |
[17] | J. K. Hale, J. Kato, Phase space for retarded equations with infinite delay, Funkc. Ekvacioj, 21 (1978), 11–41. |
[18] |
K. Schumacher, Existence and continuous dependence for functional-differential equations with unbounded delay, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 67 (1978), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00247662 doi: 10.1007/BF00247662
![]() |
[19] |
F. Kappel, W. Schappacher, Some considerations to the fundamental theory of infinite delay equations, J. Differ. Equ., 37 (1980), 141–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0396(80)90093-5 doi: 10.1016/0022-0396(80)90093-5
![]() |
[20] |
J. K. Hale, Functional differential equations with infinite delays, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 48 (1974), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(74)90233-9 doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(74)90233-9
![]() |
[21] |
C. Corduneanu, V. Lakshmikantham, Equations with unbounded delay: A survey, Nonlinear Anal., 4 (1980), 831–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-546X(80)90001-2 doi: 10.1016/0362-546X(80)90001-2
![]() |
[22] | Y. Hino, S. Murakami, T. Naito, Functional differential equations with infinite delay, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0084432 |
[23] | V. Lakshmikantham, L. Wen, B. Zhang, Theory of differential equations with unbounded delay, New York: Springer, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2606-3 |
[24] |
M. Benchohra, J. Henderson, S. K. Ntouyas, A. Ouahab, Existence results for fractional order functional differential equations with infinite delay, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 338 (2008), 1340–1350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.06.021 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.06.021
![]() |
[25] |
H. Bao, J. Cao, Existence of solutions for fractional stochastic impulsive neutral functional differential equations with infinite delay, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2017 (2017), 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-017-1106-5 doi: 10.1186/s13662-017-1106-5
![]() |
[26] |
M. Benchohra, S. Litimein, J. J. Nieto, Semilinear fractional differential equations with infinite delay and non-instantaneous impulses, J. Fixed Point Theory Appl., 21 (2019), 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11784-019-0660-8 doi: 10.1007/s11784-019-0660-8
![]() |
[27] |
Y. Li, Y. Wang, The existence and asymptotic behavior of solutions to fractional stochastic evolution equations with infinite delay, J. Differ. Equ., 266 (2019), 3514–3558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2018.09.009 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2018.09.009
![]() |
[28] |
B. Ahmad, M. Alghanmi, A. Alsaedi, R. P. Agarwal, Nonlinear impulsive multiorder Caputo-type generalized fractional differential equations with infinite delay, Mathematics, 7 (2019), 1108. https://doi.org/10.3390/math7111108 doi: 10.3390/math7111108
![]() |
[29] |
K. Zhao, Y. Ma, Study on the existence of solutions for a class of nonlinear neutral Hadamard-type fractional integro-differential equation with infinite delay, Fractal Fract., 5 (2021), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5020052 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract5020052
![]() |
[30] |
C. Chen, Q. Dong, Existence and Hyers-Ulam stability for a multi-term fractional differential equation with infinite delay, Mathematics, 10 (2022), 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10071013 doi: 10.3390/math10071013
![]() |
[31] |
M. Alghanmi, S. Alqurayqiri, Existence results for fractional neutral functional differential equations with infinite delay and nonlocal boundary conditions, Adv. Cont. Discr. Mod., 2023 (2023), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-023-03782-4 doi: 10.1186/s13662-023-03782-4
![]() |
[32] |
X. Yang, Y. Feng, K. F. C. Yiu, Q. Song, , F. E. Alsaadi, Synchronization of coupled neural networks with infinite time distributed delays via quantized intermittent pinning control, Nonlinear Dyn., 94 (2018), 2289–2303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-018-4449-x doi: 10.1007/s11071-018-4449-x
![]() |
[33] |
J. Liu, K. Zhao, Existence of mild solution for a class of coupled systems of neutral fractional integro-differential equations with infinite delay in Banach space, Adv. Differ. Equ. 2019 (2019), 284. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-019-2232-z doi: 10.1186/s13662-019-2232-z
![]() |
[34] |
F. Z. Mokkedem, Approximate controllability for a class of linear neutral evolution systems with infinite delay, J. Dyn. Control Syst., 28 (2022), 917–943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10883-021-09560-3 doi: 10.1007/s10883-021-09560-3
![]() |
[35] | A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, Amsterdam, Boston: Elsevier, 2006. |
[36] | V. Pata, Fixed point theorems and applications, Cham: Springer, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19670-7 |
1. | Ana Savić, Kemal Eren, Soley Ersoy, Vladimir Baltić, Alternative View of Inextensible Flows of Curves and Ruled Surfaces via Alternative Frame, 2024, 12, 2227-7390, 2015, 10.3390/math12132015 | |
2. | Özgür Boyacıoğlu Kalkan, Süleyman Şenyurt, Mustafa Bilici, Davut Canlı, Sweeping surfaces generated by involutes of a spacelike curve with a timelike binormal in Minkowski 3-space, 2025, 10, 2473-6988, 988, 10.3934/math.2025047 | |
3. | Emad Solouma, Ibrahim Al-Dayel, Mohamed A. Abdelkawy, Ruled Surfaces and Their Geometric Invariants via the Orthogonal Modified Frame in Minkowski 3-Space, 2025, 13, 2227-7390, 940, 10.3390/math13060940 | |
4. | Özgür Boyacıoğlu Kalkan, Süleyman Şenyurt, Davut Canlı, Luca Grilli, Involute Partner-Ruled Surfaces Formed by Involutes of Spacelike Curves in Minkowski Three-Space, 2025, 14, 2075-1680, 337, 10.3390/axioms14050337 |