1.
Introduction
Fixed point theory provides a suitable framework to solve a system of linear and nonlinear functional equations, which are applicable in various areas of research such as engineering, chemistry, game theory, economics, etc. The Picard iteration procedure is one of the most simplest iterative procedures and is used for approximating unique fixed point (FP) for mapping/operators satisfying contractive type conditions. However, in case of slightly weaker contractive operators such as nonexpansive mappings, the Picard iterative procedure fails to converge.
So, it is important to consider iterative procedures which converge for the larger class of operators. Various iterative techniques were developed in literature to estimate the FPs of certain operators of practical nature. Some famous iterative procedures are Mann [1], Ishikawa [2], Agarwal et al. [3], Noor [4], SP [5], CR [6], Abbas & Nazir [7], Picard-Mann [8], Picard-S [9] and Kadioglu & Yildirim [10].
The rate of convergence and stability are some of the most distinguishing features of an iterative procedure which are always desirable. These criterions play vital role when one iterative procedure is compared with the other. For instance, Newton and quasi Newton methods are always preferred for solutions of the system of nonlinear Eqs on the basis of their rate of convergence given that an appropriate initial guess to the solution is known. Rhoades [11] proved that the convergence of the well-known Mann iteration faster than that of Ishikawa iteration for the class of decreasing function and vice versa for the class of increasing functions. It is observed that [3], the convergence rate of Agarwal et al. iteration and Picard iteration is same and both are faster than the Mann iteration for the class of contraction mappings. Authors in [7] introduced an iteration with better and faster convergence than Agarwal et al. iteration. The authors in [6] claimed that the CR iteration is either equivalent or faster than Mann, Picard, Ishikawa, Agarwal et al., SP, and Noor iterations for the class of quasi-contractive operators in the setting of Banach spaces. Karakaya with his coauthors in [12] proved that for contraction mappings, the CR iteration is faster than S∗-iteration. One other interesting result can be found in [9] and for other details, we refer [13,14,15] and references therein.
Motivated by the work quoted above, the authors [16] proposed a new iteration known as K∗ iteration in Banach spaces and show that K∗ iterative procedure is faster than many other iterative schemes. We compare the convergence of the K∗ iterative procedure numerically with numerous iteration processes in the existing literature by using generalized mapping. The graphs of complex polynomials are also drawn using the K∗-iterative procedure. All the work done in this paper is for a general class of contractive-like operators.
2.
Preliminaries
Consider a real normed sapces E and a mapping T:E→E. If T(x∗)=x∗ than x∗∈E is called FP of T and the set of FPs of T is represented by F(T). Now, we give a brief description of existing iterations which are relevant to our work in this paper.
The well-known Picard-iteration sequence {xn} is:
The Mann-iteration [1] is a one step iterative procedure which described by the following sequence {xn}:
where {α1n}∞n=0ϵ[0,1].
The Ishikawa iteration process [2] is a two step iterative process given by the following sequence {xn}:
where {α1n}∞n=0, {α2n}∞n=0 ϵ[0,1].
Motivated by [2], a two step iteration was proposed in [3], which is known as Agarwal et al. iteration;
where {α1n}∞n=0, {α2n}∞n=0 ϵ[0,1].
In 2013, Khan [8] proposed a new iteration namely 'Picard-Mann-hybrid iteration' which is given by the sequence
where {α1n}∞n=0 ∈ [0,1].
Noor iteration [4] is a three step iterative procedure defined by the following scheme {xn}:
where {α1n}∞n=0,{α2n}∞n=0, {α3n}∞n=0 ϵ [0,1].
The SP-iteration is a three step iteration introduced in 2011 [5] as;
where {α1n}∞n=0,{α2n}∞n=0, {α3n}∞n=0 ϵ [0,1].
The CR iteration was introduced Chugh et al. in 2012 [6] as;
where {α1n}∞n=0,{α2n}∞n=0, {α3n}∞n=0 ϵ [0,1].
The Picard-S-iteration [9] was introduced as;
where {α1n}∞n=0, {α2n}∞n=0 ϵ [0,1].
Kadioglu & Yildirim [10] studied the following iteration procedure:
where {α1n}∞n=0, {α2n}∞n=0 ϵ [0,1].
Ullah and Arshad [16] introduce following a new modified iteration-process, known as K∗ iteration process:
where {α1n}∞n=0, {α2n}∞n=0 ϵ [0,1].
The iteration procedure (2.11) is stable and performs better than all above mentioned iterations.
The different stability results have been studied by Osilike in [17] by using the following definition of contractive
Definition 1. Let x,y∈X, then we have 0≤δ<1 and L≥0 satisfying;
The authors in [18] proved the results of stability by using the following more general definition;
Here x,y∈X and 0≤δ<1. Moreover ϕ:R+→R+ is aan increasing function satisfying ϕ(0)=0.
Recently, Bosede and Rhoades [19] pointed out that assumptions (2.12), (2.13) and its several variants are pointless. Indeed, if x=Tx∗=x∗, then (2.12) and (2.13) reduce to the following: For x,y∈X, there exist 0≤δ<1 satisfying
and in the real normed spaces, for each x,y∈X, there exist 0≤δ<1 such that
For examples to illustrate that the (2.15) is more general than that of (2.12) and (2.13) see [20].
Lemma 1. [21] Consider the real sequences {ψn}∞n=0 and {φn}∞n=0 that are non-negative and
holds, where ϕn∈(0,1) for all n0∈N,∞∑n=0 ϕn=∞ and φnϕn→0 as n→∞, then limn→∞ψn=0.
Lemma 2. [22] Consider a real non-negative sequence {ψn}∞n=0 and n0∈N and
holds for all n≥n0, where ϕn∈(0,1) for all n∈N,∞∑n=0 ϕn=∞ and φn≥0 for all n∈N. Then
Definition 2. ([23]) Consider two convergent real sequences {an}∞n=0 and {bn}∞n=0 that converges to a and b, respectively. The convergence rate of {an}∞n=0 is faster than that of {bn}∞n=0 if we have
Definition 3. ([23]) Consider two iterations {un}∞n=0 and {vn}∞n=0 converge to the common FP p. If ‖un−p‖≤an and ‖vn−p‖≤bn, for all n≥0, where {an}∞n=0 and {bn}∞n=0 two convergent sequences of real number that converges to 0. Then the convergence of {un}∞n=0 is faster than that of {vn}∞n=0 if the convergence of {an}∞n=0 is faster than that of {bn}∞n=0.
Definition 4. ([24]) Let {tn}∞n=0 be an arbitrary sequence in C. Then, an iteration procedure xn+1=f(T,xn), converging to fixed point p, is said to be T-stable or stable with respect to T, if for ϵn=‖tn+1−f(T,tn)‖ ,n=0,1,2,3,..., we have limn→∞∈n=0⇔limn→∞tn=x∗.
3.
Main results
Theorem 3.1. Consider a real normed (E,‖.‖) and a mapping T:E→E with a FP x∗ satisfying (2.15). Let {xn}∞n=0 be defined by (2.11), where {α1n}∞n=0 and {α2n}∞n=0 are in [0,1] and ∞∑n=0α1nα2n=∞. Then {xn}∞n=0 converges to x∗ (strongly).
Proof. From (2.11), by means of simple calculation, we get
and
By using (3.1) in (3.2) we obtain
Thus from (3.3)
Now, by (3.4) we inductively obtain,
Using 0<δ<1,{α1n}∞n=0 and {α2n}∞n=0 are in [0,1] and ∞∑n=0α1nα2n=∞, we get
that is, {xn}∞n=0 converges strongly to x∗.
Theorem 3.2. Consider a real normed space (E,‖.‖) and a mapping T:E→E with a FP x∗ satisfying (2.15). Let {xn}∞n=0 be defined by (2.11), where {α1n}∞n=0, {α2n}∞n=0 ϵ [0,1] such that ∞∑n=0α1nα2n=∞. Then, the {xn}∞n=0 is T−stable.
Proof. The sequence defined in (2.11) converges to x∗ by Theorem 3.1 so consider real sequences {tn}∞n=0,{un}∞n=0 and {vn}∞n=0 in E, where
Let ∈n=‖tn+1−Tun‖. We shall prove that limn→∞∈n=0⇔limn→∞tn=x∗. Let limn→∞∈n=0, Then we shall prove that limn→∞tn=x∗ for mapping satisfying condition (2.15). That is,
Using condition (2.15), we have
substituting (3.8) in (3.7), we get
Then using (3.3)
Since 0<α1α2<α1nα2n,
by mean of Lemma 1 in (3.11) we get
Conversely, let limn→∞tn=x∗. We show that limn→∞∈n=0
Hence limn→∞∈n=0 and the iteration (2.11) is T-stable.
Theorem 3.3. Consider a real normed space (E,‖.‖) and a mapping T:E→E with FP x∗ satisfying (2.15). Let the sequences {xn}∞n=0 and {un}∞n=0 as in (2.11) and (2.10) respectively, where {α1n}∞n=0 and {α2n}∞n=0 are in [0,1] and ∞∑n=0α1nα2n=∞. Then the convergence of iteration scheme {xn}∞n=0 to x∗ of T is faster than that of {un}∞n=0.
Proof. Using Theorem 3.1,
Let
From (2.10), we have
Similarly
From (3.14) and (3.15), we get
Now, by (3.17) we inductively obtain,
Let
Since 0<δ<1, then
Example 3.4. Consider the usual normed space E=R, S=[1,100] and a mapping T:S→S defined as Tx=√x2−8x+40 ∀ x∈S. Then, T satisfies the condition (2.15) with δ∈[0.5222,0.9987] and has a unique FP x∗=5. Take α1n=α2n=α3n=12 and initial guess x0=u0=100. It can be observed from Tables 1 and 2 that the convergence of K∗ iteration to x∗=5 is faster than that of SP, Noor, Ishikawa ARS, Picard-Mann, Abbas, CR, Picard-S and Kadioglu & Yildirim iterations.
4.
Application of K∗ iteration
Polynomiography defined by Kalantari in 2005 as "the art and science of visualization in approximation of the zeros of complex polynomials, via fractal and non fractal images produced using the convergence properties of iteration functions" [25]. The image obtained is named "polynomiograph". Polynomiography gives a different approach to solve the old problem by utilizing some calculations and computer. Like fractals [26], the polynomiographs can be obtained by means of various iterations. A "polynomiographer" can control the shape in a predictable way by using various iteration for a variety of complex polynomials [27,28,29,30]. These patterns can be used for textures, carpet and tapestry designs etc.
4.1. Modification of AS iteration
The famous Newton method is given by;
for complex polynomial p. Here zo∈C is an initial guess. Here, we modify Newton method by means of AS iteration the orbits for generation of polynomiograph is totally different than the orbits of Picard iteration and the iterations studied in [27,28,29,30]. Thus the obtained Basins of attraction are entirely different from the existing ones.
Consider a Banach space X=C and vo=(xo,yo) and α1n=α1, α2n=α2 such that 0<α1≤1 and 0≤α2≤1. Setting (2.11) in (4.1) for the Newton method, we obtain the following formula that is used to generate polinomiographs:
where 0<α1≤1 and 0≤α2≤1.
4.2. Graphical examples
Polynomiographs for complex polynomial equation z3−1=0 are presented in Figures 1–6 and Figures 7–12 presented examples of complex polynomial equation z3−2z+2=0 with the use of the following parameters: Resolution 500×500 pixels and were generated with maximum number of iterations =15, accuracy ε=0.001 and A=[−2,2]2. For polynomiographs presented in the following figures, one can observe that for changing parameters α1 and α2 images have different basins of attraction.
5.
Conclusions
We have introduced K∗ iteration for finding FP of a general class of contractive-like operators. Theorem 3.1 shows that our iterative method converges strongly to the FP of contractive-like operators. In Theorem 3.3 it is concluded that K∗ iteration procedure performs faster than the leading Kadioglu & Yildirim iteration process (2.10). Example 3.4 is given to verify our claim. We have presented polynomiographs for complex cubic polynomials via K∗ iteration process. A large variety of nicely looking aesthetic patterns can be obtained by changing parameters α1 and α2 and ε involved in our iterative procedure.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they do not have any competing interests.
Acknowledgment
This work was sponsored in part by NSFC China, Grant (11571067).