Research article Special Issues

Fractional inequalities of the Hermite–Hadamard type for m-polynomial convex and harmonically convex functions

  • In this paper, it is our purpose to establish some new fractional inequalities of the Hermite–Hadamard type for the m-polynomial convex and harmonically convex functions. Our results involve the Caputo–Fabrizio and ζ-Riemann–Liouville fractional integral operators. They generalize, complement and extend existing results in the literature. By taking m2, we deduce loads of new and interesting inequalities. We expect that the thought laid out in this work will provoke advance examinations in this course.

    Citation: Eze R. Nwaeze, Muhammad Adil Khan, Ali Ahmadian, Mohammad Nazir Ahmad, Ahmad Kamil Mahmood. Fractional inequalities of the Hermite–Hadamard type for m-polynomial convex and harmonically convex functions[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1889-1904. doi: 10.3934/math.2021115

    Related Papers:

    [1] Donatella Danielli, Rohit Jain . Regularity results for a penalized boundary obstacle problem. Mathematics in Engineering, 2021, 3(1): 1-23. doi: 10.3934/mine.2021007
    [2] Fernando Farroni, Gioconda Moscariello, Gabriella Zecca . Lewy-Stampacchia inequality for noncoercive parabolic obstacle problems. Mathematics in Engineering, 2023, 5(4): 1-23. doi: 10.3934/mine.2023071
    [3] Catharine W. K. Lo, José Francisco Rodrigues . On the obstacle problem in fractional generalised Orlicz spaces. Mathematics in Engineering, 2024, 6(5): 676-704. doi: 10.3934/mine.2024026
    [4] Antonio Vitolo . Singular elliptic equations with directional diffusion. Mathematics in Engineering, 2021, 3(3): 1-16. doi: 10.3934/mine.2021027
    [5] Aleksandr Dzhugan, Fausto Ferrari . Domain variation solutions for degenerate two phase free boundary problems. Mathematics in Engineering, 2021, 3(6): 1-29. doi: 10.3934/mine.2021043
    [6] Youchan Kim, Seungjin Ryu, Pilsoo Shin . Approximation of elliptic and parabolic equations with Dirichlet boundary conditions. Mathematics in Engineering, 2023, 5(4): 1-43. doi: 10.3934/mine.2023079
    [7] Xavier Fernández-Real, Alessio Figalli . On the obstacle problem for the 1D wave equation. Mathematics in Engineering, 2020, 2(4): 584-597. doi: 10.3934/mine.2020026
    [8] Daniela De Silva, Giorgio Tortone . Improvement of flatness for vector valued free boundary problems. Mathematics in Engineering, 2020, 2(4): 598-613. doi: 10.3934/mine.2020027
    [9] Luca Spolaor, Bozhidar Velichkov . On the logarithmic epiperimetric inequality for the obstacle problem. Mathematics in Engineering, 2021, 3(1): 1-42. doi: 10.3934/mine.2021004
    [10] Giovanni Cupini, Paolo Marcellini, Elvira Mascolo . Local boundedness of weak solutions to elliptic equations with p,qgrowth. Mathematics in Engineering, 2023, 5(3): 1-28. doi: 10.3934/mine.2023065
  • In this paper, it is our purpose to establish some new fractional inequalities of the Hermite–Hadamard type for the m-polynomial convex and harmonically convex functions. Our results involve the Caputo–Fabrizio and ζ-Riemann–Liouville fractional integral operators. They generalize, complement and extend existing results in the literature. By taking m2, we deduce loads of new and interesting inequalities. We expect that the thought laid out in this work will provoke advance examinations in this course.


    Dual numbers were introduced in the 19th century by Clifford, and their applications to rigid body kinematics were subsequently generalized by Kafelnikov and study in their principle of transference. The principle of transference, states that if dual numbers replace real ones (see [2,3]); then all relations of vector algebra for intersecting lines are also valid for skew lines. In practice, this means that all rules of vector algebra for the kinematics of a rigid body with a fixed point (spherical kinematics) also hold for motor algebra of a free rigid body (spatial kinematics). As a result, a general rigid body motion can be described by only three dual equations rather than six real ones. For several decades there were attempts to apply dual numbers to rigid body dynamics. Investigators showed that the momentum of a rigid body can be described as a motor that obeys the motor transformation rule, hence, its derivative with respect to time yields the dual force. However, in those investigations, while going from the velocity motor to the momentum motor, there was always a need to expand the equation to six dimensions and to treat the velocity motor as two separated real vectors. This process actually diminishes one of the main advantages of dual numbers-namely, compactness of representation. Screws in the space can be represented by dual vectors at the origin. The components of a dual vector consisting of a line vector at the origin and the perpendicular moment vector for the line vector in the space are equal to Plucker's line coordinates. Furthermore, the space of lines could be represented by points on the unit sphere and points in the tangential planes that affiliated to each point on the sphere (see [1,4]).

    A dual number ˆx is defined as an ordered pair of real numbers (x,x) expressed formally as (see [5]):

    ˆx=x+εx, (1.1)

    where x is referred to the real part and x to the dual part. The symbol ε is a multiplier which has the property ε2=0. The algebra of dual numbers results from (1.1). Two dual numbers are equal if and only if their real and dual parts are equal, respectively. As in the case of complex numbers, addition of two dual numbers is defined as (see [4,5])

    (x+εx)+(y+εy)=(x+y)+ε(x+y). (1.2)

    Multiplication of two dual numbers result in (see [6]):

    (x+εx)(y+εy)=xy+ε(xy+xy). (1.3)

    Division of dual numbers ˆxˆy is defined as (see [1]):

    ˆxˆy=xy+ε(xyxyy2),y0. (1.4)

    Note that the division is possible and unambiguous only if y0.

    Dual function of dual number presents a mapping of a space of dual numbers on itself, namely (see [3,6,7]).

    ˆf(ˆx)=f(x)+εf(x,x) (1.5)

    where ˆx=x+εx is a dual variable, f and fare two, generally different, f is a function of two variables. The dual function (1.5) is said to be analytic if it satisfies the following:

    ˆf(x+εx)=f+εf=f(x)+ε(xf(x)+˜f(x)),=ddx (1.6)

    where ˜f(x) is an arbitrary function of a real part of a dual variable. The analytic condition for dual function is (see [1]):

    fx=fx. (1.7)

    The derivative of such a dual function with respect to a dual variable is

    dˆf(ˆx)dˆx=fx+εfx. (1.8)

    Taking into account (1.7) we have:

    dˆf(ˆx)dˆx=fx+εfx=f(x)+ε(xf(x)+~f(x)). (1.9)

    If a function f(x) has the derivative f(x), its value for the dual argument ˆx=x+εx is denoted by ˆf(ˆx) or ˆf(x). Using the formal Taylor expansion of the function ˆf(x) with the property ε2=0; we have (see [6,8]).

    ˆf(x)=f(x+εx)=f(x)+εxf(x). (1.10)

    The set

    D3=D×D×D={ˆx_:ˆx_=(x1+εx1,x2+εx2,x3+εx3)=(x1,x2,x3)+ε(x1,x2,x3)=x_+εx_,x_,x_R3},

    is a module on the ring D and is called the dual space (vector space defined on the field of dual numbers). For any ˆx_=x_+εx_,ˆy_=y_+εy_D3, the scalar or inner product and the vector product <ˆx_,ˆy_>, ˆx_ˆy_ of ˆx_ and ˆy_ are defined respectively by (see [9,10]):

    <ˆx_,ˆy_>=<x_,y_>+ε(<x_,y_>+<x_,y_>), (1.11)
    ˆx_ˆy_=(x2_y3_x3_y2_,x3_y1_x1_y3_,x1_y2_x2_y1_), (1.12)

    where ˆx=(xi+εxi), ˆy=(yi+εyi) D3, 1i3.

    If x0, the normˆx_ is defined by (see [11,12])

    ˆx_∥=<ˆx_,ˆx_>=∥x_+ε<x_,x_>x_. (1.13)

    A dual vector ˆx_=x_+εx_ is a dual unit vector which satisfies the following <x_,x_>=0 and <x_,x_>=1. Then, we have that <ˆx_,ˆx_>=1, also a dual vector ˆx_ with the unit norm is called a dual unit vector The subset S2={ˆx_=x_+εx_:∥ˆx_∥=(1,0);x_,x_R3}D3 is called the dual unit sphere with the center ˆO in D3.

    If every xi(u) and xi(u), 1in and uRn, are differentiable dual valued functions, the dual vector field ^x(u) is defined as the following:

    ˆx:uRnDn (see [11]),

    ^x(u)=x(u)+εx(u).

    Dual space curve is a dual vector field of one variable defined as the following:

    ˆx:IRD3,

    where

    u^x(u)=(x1(u)+εx1(u),x2(u)+εx2(u),x3(u)+εx3(u))=x+εxD3,

    is differentiable. The real part x_(u) is called the indicatrix of the space curve ˆx(u). The dual arc length of the curve ˆx(u) from u1 to u is defined as (see [2,12])

    uu1(ˆx_)du=uu1(x_)du+uεu1<T_,(x_(u))>du=s+εs

    where T_ is a unit tangent vector of x_(u). From now on, we will take the arc length s of x_(u) as the parameter instead of u.

    A dual ruled surface results from the motion of line in the dual space D3, similarly to the way a dual curve represents the motion of a dual point.A dual ruled surface is a surface swept out by a dual straight line L with moving direction ˆw(u1) along a dual curve ˆα. Such a surface always has a parameterization in the ruled form (see [11,13,14])

    ˆσ:ˆR(^u1,^u2)=ˆα(^u1)+^u2ˆw(^u1),^u1ˆID,^u2D (2.1)

    where, ˆu1=u1+εu1,ˆu2=u2+εu2,ˆα(^u1)=α(^u1)+εα(^u1),ˆw(^u1)=w(^u1)+εw(^u1).

    The dual ruled surface generated by the family {ˆα(^u1),ˆw(^u1)}, where ˆα(^u1) is a dual directrix of the dual surface and ˆw(^u1) is the unit dual generator.

    Using the formally Taylor expansion and the derivative of a dual function, we can write Eq (2.1) in the dual representation vector as (see [2]),

    ˆR(^u1,^u2)=R(u1,u2)+εR(uη,uγ) (2.2)

    where

    σ:R(u1,u2)=α(u1)+u2w(u1) (2.3)
    σ:R(uη,uγ)=α(u1)+u1α(u1)+u2w(u1)+u2(w(u1)+u1w(u1)) (2.4)

    where =ddu1 and R=R(u1,u2,u1,u2) is a regular vector function in four variables u1,u2,u1,u1 This function can be written in the ruled form (see [5]),

    R(uη,uγ)=α(u1)+u1l(u1)+u2w(u1)+u2w(u1)l(u1)=α(u1)+w(u1). (2.5)

    From Eqs (2.3)–(2.5) one can see the following:

    Theorem 1. (see [5,12]) For any ruled surface defined in the dual space through the vector field ˆR(ˆuβ), there are a real ruled surface R(u1,u2) and 2-parametric family of ruled surfaces given by R(uη,uγ).

    The 2-parametric family of ruled surface is defined through the function R(uη,uγ) and this function depends on 4 independent parameters uη,uγ, thus we have:

    Corollary 1. (see [5]) The vector valued function R(uη,uγ) characterizes the space of lines (4-dimensional Grassmann manifold) or line space attached to the dual ruled surface.

    Assume that the dual ruled surface is a non cylindrical with |ˆw(^u1)|=1, ˆu1ˆI. i.e <ˆw(ˆu1),ˆw(ˆu1)>=0 for all ˆu1ˆI.

    First we construct a parameterized dual curve ˆβ(ˆu1) lies on the trace of ˆR; such that <ˆβ(ˆu1),ˆw(ˆu1)>=0, ˆu1I that is

    ˆβ(ˆu1)=ˆα(ˆu1)+^u2(ˆu1)ˆw(ˆu1). (2.6)

    Using the formally Taylor expansion and the derivative of a dual function, Eq (2.6) can be written in the dual representation vector as the following (see [2,5]):

    ˆβ(ˆu1)=β(u1)+εβ(uκ,u1), (2.7)

    where

    β(u1)=α(u1)+u2(u1)w(u1),β(uκ,u1)=α(u1)+u1α(u1)+u2(u1)(w(u1)+u1w(u1))+w(u1)(u2(u1)+u1u2(u1)) (2.8)

    for some dual valued function ^u2=^u2(ˆu1).

    Assuming the existence of such dual curve ˆβ, one obtains

    ˆβ(^u1)=ˆα+^u2ˆw+^u2ˆw. (2.9)

    Taylor expansion and the derivative of a dual function gives

    ˆβ(ˆu1)=β(u1)+εβ(u1), (2.10)

    where

    β(u1)=α+u2(u1)w+u2(u1)w,β(u1,u1)=α+u1α+u2(u1)(w+u1w)+w(u2(u1)+u1u2)+u2(u1)(w+u1w)+w(u2(u1)+u1u2). (2.11)

    Since <ˆw(ˆu1),ˆw(ˆu1)>=0, we have

    ^u2=<ˆα,ˆw><ˆw,ˆw>. (2.12)

    Equation (2.12) can be written in the dual representation vector by using Taylor expansion as the following

    ^u2=u2(u1)+εu2(u1) (2.13)

    where

    u2(u1)=<α(u1),w(u1)><w(u1),w(u1)>,u2(u1)=<α,w+u1w>+<w,α+u1α><w,w><α,w><w,w+u1w><w,w>2. (2.14)

    Thus, if we define ˆβ(ˆu1) by Eqs (2.4) and (2.12), we obtain the required dual curve, which is called the dual line of striction and its points are called the central points of the dual ruled surface. Thus the striction curve on the real ruled surface σ is given by

    β(u1)=α(u1)<α(u1),w(u1)><w(u1),w(u1)>w(u1). (2.15)

    In this case the line space σ degenerate to 1-parametric family of ruled surfaces is given by

    R=R(uη,uγ),u2=u2(u1)

    such function are defined explicitly by (2.4) and(2.14) respectively.

    Now we take the line of striction ˆβ=ˆβ(ˆu1) as the directrix of the dual ruled surface (2.1) which is given by

    ˆR(ˆu1,ˆu2)=ˆβ(ˆu1)+ˆu2ˆw(ˆu1), (2.16)

    where ˆβ=ˆβ(ˆu1) is given through (2.7), (2.8), (2.13) and (2.14).

    Thus, we have proved the following:

    Lemma 1. (see [11,12]) For the dual line of striction on the dual ruled surfaces. There exists a real line of striction on the real ruled surface attached to the dual ruled surface.

    Here, we try to give dual forms for the invariants attached to the dual ruled surface such as, the parameter of distribution and Gaussian curvature. Using the dual differentiation which is presented in section one, one can obtain the dual tangent vector ˆRα to the dual ruled surface as in the following.

    ˆR1=R1(u1,u2)+εR1(uκ,uγ),ˆR2=R2+εR2,ˆRα=ˆRˆuα (3.1)

    where

    R1(u1,u2)=β+u2w,R1(uκ,uγ)=(β+u1β+u2w+u1w),R2(u1,u1)=w,R2(u1,u1)=w+u1w, (3.2)

    and the dual normal vector field is given as

    ˆR1ˆR2=ˆβˆw+ˆu2(ˆwˆw). (3.3)

    The dual representation of (2.18) can be written in the form

    ˆR1ˆR2=ζ(u1,u2)+εζ(uη,uγ), (3.4)

    where

    ζ=βw+u2ww,ζ=(β+u2w)(w+w)+(u2(w+u1β)+u2w+β+u1β)w. (3.5)

    Since <ˆw,ˆw>=0 and <ˆw,ˆβ>=0, we conclude that for some dual function ˆλ=ˆλ(ˆu1), we have

    ˆβˆw=ˆλˆw, (3.6)
    |ˆR1ˆR2|2=|ˆλˆw+ˆu2ˆwˆw|2=ˆλ2|ˆw|2+ˆu2|ˆw|2=(ˆλ2+ˆu2)|ˆw|2. (3.7)

    The discriminant ˆg of the first fundamental form can be written as

    ˆg=|ˆR1ˆR2|2=(ˆλ2+ˆu2)|ˆw|2=(λ2+u2)|w|2+2ε((λ2+u2)ww+w2(λλ+u2u2))=g+εg, (3.8)

    where

    g=(λ2+u2)|w|2,g=2((λ2+u2)ww+w2(λλ+u2u2)). (3.9)

    It follows that the only singular point on the ruled surface (2.15) is along the line of striction ˆu2=0, and it will occur if and only if ˆλ(ˆu1)=0. Then from (2.21) one can see that

    ˆλ=(ˆβ,ˆw,ˆw)|ˆw|2. (3.10)

    Remark 1. ˆλ=0λ=λ=0,ˆu2=0u2=0,u2=0.

    Equation (2.23) can be written in the dual vector representation as

    ˆλ(ˆu1)=λ(u1)+ελ(u1,u1), (3.11)

    where

    λ(u1)=(β,w,w)|w|2,λ(u1,u1)=2(β,w,w)<w,w+u1w>|w|4+(β,w+u1w,w+w)+(β+u1β,w,w)|w|2. (3.12)

    Definition. The dual function ˆλ(ˆu1) is called the dual distribution parameter of the dual ruled surface ˆR.

    The dual unit normal vector field on the dual surface (2.15) is

    ˆN=ˆR1ˆR2|ˆR1ˆR2|=ˆR1ˆR2ˆg, (3.13)

    then from Eqs (3.4) and (3.8) we have

    ˆN=ζ(u1,u2)+εζ(uη,uγ)g+εg=ζg2+εζg2gζg3=N+εN. (3.14)

    Thus we have the following interesting results

    Lemma 2. The unit dual normal vector field of two parts, one is the real unit normal vector field and the other is the vector field depends on the line space attached to the dual ruled surface.

    The same lemma can be reformulated for the dual parameter of distribution and the line of striction as shown in the Eqs (2.4), (2.16), (3.11), respectively.

    The coefficients of the first fundamental form are given in the following form

    ˆg11=<ˆβ,ˆβ>+(u2)2<ˆw,ˆw>=(<β,β>+(u2)2<w,w>)+ε(2<β,β>+2(u2)2<ˆw,^w>)=g11+εg11,ˆg12=<ˆβ,ˆw>=<β,w>+ε(<β,w>+<β,w>)=g12+εg12,ˆg22=1. (3.15)

    Using the definition of the Gauss curvature ˆK and routine calculations one obtains

    ˆK=ˆλ2|ˆw|4(ˆλ2+(ˆu2)2)2|ˆw|4=ˆλ2(ˆλ2+(ˆu2)2)2. (3.16)

    From (2.24) we have

    ˆK(ˆu1,ˆu2)=K(u1,u2)+εK(uκ,uγ), (3.17)

    where

    K(u1,u2)=λ2¯λ2,¯λ=λ2+(u2)2,K(uκ,uγ)=(2λλ+2u1λλ)((u2)2λ2)+2λ2u2u2¯λ3. (3.18)

    Remark 2. The function K is the Gauss curvature of the real ruled surface σ.

    The vector valued function (2.5) defines a 2-parametric family of ruled surfaces σ. Here we give a classification to the ruled surfaces belonging to this family, which are called partially dual ruled surfaces.

    (Ⅰ) Consider u1=0 and ˆu2=u2+εu2 and using Eqs (2.3)–(2.5), we have a partially dual ruled surface σI given by

    ˆσI:ˆR(u1,^u2)=R(u1,u2)+εR(u1,u2,u2), (4.1)

    where

    σI:R(u1,u2)=α(u1)+u2w(u1), (4.2)
    σI:R(uκ,u2)=α(u1)+u2w(u1)+u2w(u1). (4.3)

    It is easy to see that the function R defines 3-parametric family of lines σIi,i=1,2,3. Now, we take the line of striction as the directrix of the dual ruled surface and using (2.16), (3.1)–(3.10) we have the following:

    Lemma 3. The dual parameter of distribution ^λ1 is given as

    ^λ1(ˆu1)=λ1(u1)+ελ1(u1), (4.4)

    where

    λ1(u1)=(β,w,w)|w|2,λ1(u1)=2(β,w,w)<w,w>|w|4+(β,w,w+w)+(β,w,w)|w|2. (4.5)

    Lemma 4. The dual Gaussian curvature ^K2 is given as

    ^K1(ˆu1,ˆu2)=K1(u1,u2)+εK1(uη,u2), (4.6)
    K1(u1,u2)=λ12¯λ1,¯λ=λ12+(u2)2,K1(uη,u2)=2λ1λ1((u2)2λ12)+2λ12u2u2¯λ13. (4.7)

    Remark 3. The functions λ1,K1 is defined for the real ruled surface σI.

    Geometric interpretation

    For the vector valued function R=R(u1,u2,u2) given by Eq (3.3), we consider the following cases:

    (1) u2=const=c1, characterizes a dual ruled surface σI1 defined as

    σI1:ˆR(u1,u2)=˜r(u1)+u2¯r(u1), (4.8)

    where

    ˜r(u1)=α(u1)+c1w(u1),¯r(u1)=w(u1). (4.9)

    (2) u2=const=c2, define a dual ruled surface σI2 as

    ˆR(u1,u2)=˜r(u1)+u2¯r(u1), (4.10)

    where

    ˜r(u1)=α(u1)+c2w(u1),¯r(u1)=w(u1). (4.11)

    (3) u1=const=c1, describes a degenerate ruled surface σI3 (plane) passing through the point α(u1) and contains the fixed directions w(u1),w.

    (⨿) Consider u2=0 and ˆu1=u1+εu1 and using Eqs (2.3)–(2.5) we have a partially dual ruled surface σ⨿ given as

    ˆσ⨿:ˆR(^u1,u2)=R(u1,u2)+εR(uη,u1), (4.12)

    where

    σ⨿:R(u1,u2)=α(u1)+u2w(u1), (4.13)
    σ⨿:R(uη,u1)=α(u1)+u1α(u1)+u2(w(u1)+u1w(u1)). (4.14)

    Similarly as in case one, it is easy to see that the function R defines a 3-parametric family of lines σ⨿i,i=1,2,3 as in case Ⅰ. Thus we have the following:

    Lemma 5. The dual parameter of distribution ^λ2 is given as

    ^λ2(ˆu1)=λ2(u1)+ελ2(u1,u1), (4.15)

    where

    λ2(u1)=(β,w,w)|w|2,λ2(u1,u1)=2(β,w,w)<w,w+u1w>|w|4+(β,w+u1w,w+w)+(β+u1β,w,w)|w|2. (4.16)

    Lemma 6. The dual Gaussian curvature ^K2 is given as

    ^K2(ˆu1,u2)=K2(u1,u2)+εK2(uη,u1), (4.17)

    where

    K2(u1,u2)=λ22¯λ22,¯λ2=λ22+(u2)2,K2(uη,u1)=2λ2λ2+2u1λ2λ2((u2)2λ22)¯λ23. (4.18)

    Remark 4. The vector function R represents the real part of the dual ruled surface which coincident with the well known construction of the ruled surface, while the function R(uγ,uγ) represents the dual part of the dual ruled surface.

    Remark 5. The dual part R(uη,uγ) represents 2-parametric family of ruled surfaces (line space) attached to a given a dual ruled surface

    Remark 6. From (3.30), (3.32) one can see that the real parts of the parameter of distribution and the Gauss curvature have the same values for the partially ruled surface, K1=K2,λ1=λ2,¯λ1=¯λ2 (defined on areal ruled surface).

    Remark 7. The two partially ruled surfaces ˆσI,ˆσ⨿ have the same geometric interpretation, i.e., consists of two ruled surface and a plane.

    As an application to the construction of the dual ruled surfaces we consider the dual helicoid given by

    Example 1. The dual vector function:

    ˆ1:ˆR(ˆu1,ˆu2)=(ˆu2cosˆu1,ˆu2sinˆu1,ˆu1),ˆu20. (5.1)

    This vector function can be written in the dual form as

    σI:ˆR(ˆu1,ˆu2)=R(u1,u2)+εR(uη,uγ), (5.2)

    where

    σI:R(u1,u2)=(u2cosu1,u2sinu1,u1), (5.3)
    R(uη,uγ)=(u2cosu1u2u1sinu1,u2sinu1+u2u1cosu1,u1). (5.4)

    Also, we can write this equation in the dual ruled surface formula as in the following

    ˆR(ˆu1,ˆu2)=ˆβ(ˆu1)+ˆu2ˆw(ˆu1), (5.5)

    where

    ˆβ(ˆu1)=(0,0,ˆu1),ˆw(ˆu1)=(cosˆu1,sinˆu1,0). (5.6)

    Using Eqs (2.25) and (2.29), we have

    λI=1,λI=1. (5.7)

    From (5.7), (5.8) we have the well known results for the parameter of distibution, and Gaussian curvature for the helicoid given by

    KI=1(1+(u2)2)2,KI=22(u2)2+u2u21(1+(u2)2)3. (5.8)

    Example 2. Consider the dual ruled surface:

    ˆΣ⨿:ˆR(ˆu1,ˆu2)=(ˆu2cosˆu1,ˆu2sinˆu1,coshˆu1),ˆu20, (5.9)

    or in the dual form:

    ˆR(ˆu1,ˆu2)=R(u1,u2)+εR(uη,uγ), (5.10)

    where

    σ⨿:R(u1,u2)=(u2cosu1,u2sinu1,coshu1), (5.11)

    and

    σ⨿:R(uη,uγ)=(u2cosu1u2u1sinu1,u2sinu1+u2u1cosu1,u1sinhu1). (5.12)

    As a similar way to example one, we have

    λ⨿=sinhu1,λ⨿=u1coshu1, (5.13)
    K⨿=sinhu1(sinhu1+(u2)2)2,K⨿=2u1sinhu1((u2)2sinhu1)+2u2u2sinh2(sinhu1+(u2)2)2. (5.14)

    The vector valued function R(uκ,uγ), which is defined in Eq (3.4) depends on 4 independent parametric uκ,uγ, thus it characterizes the space of lines (4-dimensional Grassmann manifold). The space of lines and their subfamilies of ruled surface are constructed and plotted in Figures 111, for the two dual ruled surfaces (4.1) and (4.9) respectively.

    Figure 1.  Partially dual (pure real) σI.
    Figure 2.  Partially dual σI1 (a)u1=1, (b) u1=0.
    Figure 3.  Partially dual σI2 (a) u2=const, (b) u1=const.
    Figure 4.  Partially dual σI3 (a)u2=const, (b) u2=0, (u1,u2)(0,0).
    Figure 5.  Partially dual u2=const.
    Figure 6.  Line space σI for dual helicoid.
    Figure 7.  Partially dual (pure real) σ⨿.
    Figure 8.  Partially dual σ⨿1 (a)u1=1, (b)u1=0.
    Figure 9.  Partially dual σ⨿2 (a) u2=const, (b) u1=const.
    Figure 10.  Partially dual σ⨿3 (a)u2=const, (b) u2=0, (u1,u2)(0,0).
    Figure 11.  Line space σ⨿ for the dual ruled surface ˆΣ⨿.

    The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.



    [1] T. Abdeljawad, D. Baleanu, On fractional derivatives with exponential kernel and their discrete versions, Rep. Math. Phys., 80 (2017), 11-27. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4877(17)30059-9
    [2] M. U. Awan, N. Akhtar, S. Iftikhar, M. A. Noor, Y. M. Chu, New Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for n-polynomial harmonically convex functions, J. Inequal. Appl., 2020 (2020), 1-12. doi: 10.1186/s13660-019-2265-6
    [3] Y. M. Chu, M. Adil Khan, T. U. Khan, T. Ali, Generalizations of Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for MT-convex functions, J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl., 9 (2016), 4305-4316. doi: 10.22436/jnsa.009.06.72
    [4] M. Adil Khan, Y. M. Chu, T. U. Khan, J. Khan, Some new inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for s-convex functions with applications, Open Math., 15 (2017), 1414-1430. doi: 10.1515/math-2017-0121
    [5] M. R. Delavar, M. De La Sen, Some generalizations of Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities, SpringerPlus, 5 (2016), 1-9.
    [6] A. Guessab, G. Schmeisser, Sharp integral inequalities of the Hermite-Hadamard type, J. Approx. Theory, 115 (2002), 260-288. doi: 10.1006/jath.2001.3658
    [7] M. Gürbüz, A. O. Akdemir, S. Rashid, E. Set, Hermite-Hadamard inequality for fractional integrals of Caputo-Fabrizio type and related inequalities, J. Inequal. Appl., 2020 (2020), 1-10. doi: 10.1186/s13660-019-2265-6
    [8] İ. İşcan, Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for harmonically convex functions, Hacet. J. Math. Stat., 43 (2014), 935-942.
    [9] İ. İşcan, S. Wu, Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for harmonically convex functions via fractional integrals, Appl. Math. Comput., 238 (2014), 237-244.
    [10] A. Iqbal, M. Adil Khan, S. Ullah, Y. M. Chu, Some new Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities associated with conformable fractional integrals and their applications, J. Funct. Space., 2020 (2020), 1-18.
    [11] A. Iqbal, M. Adil Khan, N. Mohammad, E. R. Nwaeze, Revisiting the Hermite-Hadamard fractional integral inequality via a Green function, AIMS Math., 5 (2020), 6087-6107. doi: 10.3934/math.2020391
    [12] A. Iqbal, M. Adil Khan, M. Suleman, Y. M. Chu, The right Riemann-Liouville fractional Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities derived from Green's function, AIP Adv., 10 (2020), 1-10.
    [13] M. Adil Khan, Y. Khurshid, T. Ali, Hermite-Hadamard Inequality for fractional integrals via η-convex functions, Acta Math. Univ. Comenianae., 86 (2017), 153-164.
    [14] M. Adil Khan, T. Ali, T. U. Khan, Hermite-Hadamard Type Inequalities with Applications, Fasciculi Mathematici, 59 (2017), 57-74. doi: 10.1515/fascmath-2017-0017
    [15] M. Adil Khan, N. Mohammad, E. R. Nwaeze, Y. M. Chu, Quantum Hermite-Hadamard inequality by means of a green function, Adv. Diff. Equ., 2020 (2020), 1-20. doi: 10.1186/s13662-019-2438-0
    [16] T. U. Khan, M. Adil Khan, Hermite-Hadamard inequality for new generalized conformable fractional operators, AIMS Math., 6 (2020), 23-38.
    [17] P. O. Mohammed, I. Brevik, A new version of the Hermite-Hadamard inequality for Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals, Symmetry, 12 (2020), 1-11.
    [18] P. O. Mohammed, M. Z. Sarikaya, On generalized fractional integral inequalities for twice differentiable convex functions, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 372 (2020), 1-15.
    [19] P. O. Mohammed, New integral inequalities for preinvex functions via generalized beta function, J. Interdiscip. Math., 22 (2019), 539-549. doi: 10.1080/09720502.2019.1643552
    [20] A. Fernandez, P. O. Mohammed, Hermite-Hadamard inequalities in fractional calculus defined using Mittag-Leffler kernels, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., (2020), 1-18.
    [21] S. Mubeen, G. M. Habibullah, k-Fractional Integrals and Aplication, Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sci., 7 (2012), 89-94.
    [22] E. R. Nwaeze, Inequalities of the Hermite-Hadamard type for Quasi-convex functions via the (k,s)-Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals, Fractional Differ. Calc., 8 (2018), 327-336.
    [23] E. R. Nwaeze, D. F. M. Torres, Novel results on the Hermite-Hadamard kind inequality for η-convex functions by means of the (k,r)-fractional integral operators. In: S. S. Dragomir, P. Agarwal, M. Jleli, B, Samet (eds.) Advances in Mathematical Inequalities and Applications (AMIA), Trends in Mathematics, Birkhäuser, Singapore, 2018,311-321.
    [24] E. R. Nwaeze, M. Adil Khan, Y. M. Chu, Fractional inclusions of the Hermite-Hadamard type for m-polynomial convex interval-valued functions, Adv. Diff. Equ., 2020 (2020), 1-17. doi: 10.1186/s13662-019-2438-0
    [25] G. Rahman, K. S. Nisar, S. Rashid, T. Abdeljawad, Certain Gruss-type inequalities via tempered fractional integrals concerning another function, J. Inequal. Appl., 2020 (2020), 1-18. doi: 10.1186/s13660-019-2265-6
    [26] J. Sun, B. Y. Xi, F. Qi, Some new inequalities of the Hermite-Hadamard type for extended s-convex functions, J. Comput. Anal. Appl., 26 (2019), 985-996.
    [27] S. Salahshour, A. Ahmadian, C. S. Chan, Successive approximation method for Caputo q-fractional IVPs, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 24 (2015), 153-158. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.12.014
    [28] M. R. B. Shahriyar, F. Ismail, S. Aghabeigi, A. Ahmadian, S. Salahshour, An eigenvalue-eigenvector method for solving a system of fractional differential equations with uncertainty, Math. Probl. Eng., 2013 (2013), 1-10.
    [29] A. Ahmadian, S. Salahshour, M. Ali-Akbari, F. Ismail, D. Baleanu, A novel approach to approximate fractional derivative with uncertain conditions, Chaos, Solitons Fractals, 104 (2017), 68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2017.07.026
    [30] A. Ahmadian, C. S. Chan, S. Salahshour, V. Vembarasan, FTFBE: A numerical approximation for fuzzy time-fractional Bloch equation, IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, 2014,418-423.
    [31] T. Toplu, M. Kadakal, İ. İşcan, On n-Polynomial convexity and some related inequalities, AIMS Math., 5 (2020), 1304-1318.
    [32] S. S. Zhou, S. Rashid, M. A. Noor, F. Safdar, New Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for exponentially convex functions and applications, AIMS Math., 5 (2020), 6874-6901. doi: 10.3934/math.2020441
    [33] S. S. Zhou, S. Rashid, F. Jarad, H. Kalsoom, New estimates considering the generalized proportional Hadamard fractional integral operators, Adv. Diff. Equ., 2020 (2020), 1-15. doi: 10.1186/s13662-019-2438-0
    [34] S. S. Zhou, S. Rashid, S. S. Dragomir, M. A. Latif, Some New inequalities involving k-fractional integral for certain classes of functions and their applications, J. Funct. Space., 2020 (2020), 1-14.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Areej A. Almoneef, Rashad A. Abdel-Baky, Kinematic Differential Geometry of a Line Trajectory in Spatial Movement, 2023, 12, 2075-1680, 472, 10.3390/axioms12050472
    2. Areej A. Almoneef, Rashad A. Abdel-Baky, Kinematic Geometry of a Timelike Line Trajectory in Hyperbolic Locomotions, 2023, 12, 2075-1680, 915, 10.3390/axioms12100915
    3. Harun Barış Çolakoğlu, İskender Öztürk, Oğuzhan Çelik, Mustafa Özdemir, Generalized Galilean Rotations, 2024, 16, 2073-8994, 1553, 10.3390/sym16111553
    4. Areej A. Almoneef, Rashad A. Abdel-baky, Timelike line congruences via surface theory in Minkowski 3-space, 2025, 15, 2158-3226, 10.1063/5.0268437
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3505) PDF downloads(323) Cited by(12)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog