This paper investigates the optimal reinsurance-investment problem within the framework of a Stackelberg differential game. Under the constant elasticity of variance (CEV) model, a Stackelberg game model for investment-reinsurance asset-liability management between an insurer and a reinsurer is innovatively constructed. The two players are the insurer (follower) and the reinsurer (leader): The insurer aims to determine the optimal reinsurance and investment strategies, and the reinsurer seeks to formulate the optimal premium pricing and investment strategies. Both parties can allocate a risk-free asset and a risky asset whose price processes follow the CEV model, and both are exposed to uncontrollable external liabilities. To address the time–inconsistency issue in the game, the mean-variance criterion is adopted, formulating the optimization problems of both players as a nested game and deriving the corresponding extended Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equations. Based on this analytical framework, a verification theorem is formulated, which explicitly derives equilibrium reinsurance- investment strategies as well as the corresponding value functions for both the insurer and the reinsurer. Finally, numerical examples are provided to illustrate the rightness of our conclusions.
Citation: Liangli Chen, Zhijian Qiu, Lu Li. A Stackelberg reinsurance-investment game on asset-liability management under CEV model[J]. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2026, 22(7): 3151-3174. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2026115
This paper investigates the optimal reinsurance-investment problem within the framework of a Stackelberg differential game. Under the constant elasticity of variance (CEV) model, a Stackelberg game model for investment-reinsurance asset-liability management between an insurer and a reinsurer is innovatively constructed. The two players are the insurer (follower) and the reinsurer (leader): The insurer aims to determine the optimal reinsurance and investment strategies, and the reinsurer seeks to formulate the optimal premium pricing and investment strategies. Both parties can allocate a risk-free asset and a risky asset whose price processes follow the CEV model, and both are exposed to uncontrollable external liabilities. To address the time–inconsistency issue in the game, the mean-variance criterion is adopted, formulating the optimization problems of both players as a nested game and deriving the corresponding extended Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equations. Based on this analytical framework, a verification theorem is formulated, which explicitly derives equilibrium reinsurance- investment strategies as well as the corresponding value functions for both the insurer and the reinsurer. Finally, numerical examples are provided to illustrate the rightness of our conclusions.
| [1] | Z. Wang, H. Liu, Optimal reinsurance strategy under the expected premium principle, J. Xuchang Univ., 43 (2024), 13–18. |
| [2] |
R. Chen, W. Jiang, J.Yang, The Insurer's optimal reinsurance investment and hedging strategies, J. Syst. Sci. Math. Sci., 45 (2025), 3215–3227. https://doi.org/10.12341/jssms23536 doi: 10.12341/jssms23536
|
| [3] | Y. Zhang, Z. Wang, Optimal reinsurance-investment problem with HARA utility under O-U model, Chin. J. Eng. Math., 41 (2024), 915–930. |
| [4] |
S. Luo, M. Taksar, A. Tsoi, On reinsurance and investment for large insurance portfolios, Insur. Math. Econ., 42 (2008), 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.04.002 doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.04.002
|
| [5] |
G. Wang, Y. Lu, Q. Zhou, Stochastic differential investment and reinsurance game between an insurer and a reinsurer with delay and default risk under thinning dependence structure, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 21 (2025), 3790–3836. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2025032 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2025032
|
| [6] |
J. Zheng, Optimal insurance design under narrow framing, Chin. J. Eng. Math., 180 (2020), 596–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.05.020 doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.05.020
|
| [7] |
C. Bernard, F. Liu, V. Steven, Optimal insurance in the presence of multiple policyholders, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 180 (2020), 638–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.02.012 doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.02.012
|
| [8] | W. F. Sharpe, L. G. Tint, Liabilities-a new approach, J. Portf. Manag., 16 (1990), 5–10. |
| [9] |
M. C. Chiu, D. Li, Asset and liability management under a continuous-time mean–variance optimization framework, Insur. Math. Econ., 39 (2006), 330–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2006.03.006 doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2006.03.006
|
| [10] |
P. Chen, H. Yang, Y. George, Markowitz's mean-variance asset-liability management with regime switching: A continuous-time model, Insur. Math. Econ., 43 (2008), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2008.09.001 doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2008.09.001
|
| [11] |
P. Wang, W. Wang, M. Guo, The optimal dividend problem of insurance companies based on the diffusion risk model under the condition of stochastic liabilities, Math. Pract. Theory, 55 (2025), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.20266/j.math.24-0687 doi: 10.20266/j.math.24-0687
|
| [12] |
X. Peng, F. Chen, Mean-variance asset-liability management with inside information, Commun. Stat.–Theory Methods 51 (2022), 2281–2302. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2020.1772982 doi: 10.1080/03610926.2020.1772982
|
| [13] |
X. Chen, F. Huang, X. Li, Robust asset-liability management under CRRA utility criterion with regime switching: a continuous-time model, Stoch. Models, 38 (2022), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/15326349.2021.1985520 doi: 10.1080/15326349.2021.1985520
|
| [14] |
N. Wang, Y. Zhang, Robust asset-liability management games for n players under multivariate stochastic covariance models, Insur. Math. Econ., 117 (2024), 67–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2024.04.001 doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2024.04.001
|
| [15] |
Z. Liang, Y. Xia, B. Zou, A two-layer stochastic game approach to reinsurance contracting and competition, Insur. Math. Econ., 119 (2024), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2024.09.002 doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2024.09.002
|
| [16] |
Y. Yuan, K. Wang, C. Zhang, Stochastic differential reinsurance game for two competitive insurers with ambiguity-aversion under mean-variance premium principle, Ann. Oper. Res., 335 (2024), 441–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-05844-6 doi: 10.1007/s10479-024-05844-6
|
| [17] |
P. Yang, Z. Chen, X. Cui, Equilibrium reinsurance strategies for n insurers under a unified competition and cooperation framework, Scand. Actuar. J., 2021 (2021), 969–997. https://doi.org/10.1080/03461238.2021.1918577 doi: 10.1080/03461238.2021.1918577
|
| [18] |
P. Yang, Robust optimal reinsurance strategy with correlated claims and competition, AIMS Math., 8 (2023), 15689–15711. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023801 doi: 10.3934/math.2023801
|
| [19] |
L. Lin, F. Liu, J. Liu, L. Yu, The optimal reinsurance strategy with price-competition between two reinsurers, Scand. Actuar. J., 2025 (2025), 51–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/03461238.2024.2389181 doi: 10.1080/03461238.2024.2389181
|
| [20] |
T. Wang, Z. Chen, P. Yang, Optimal reinsurance contract and investment strategy for multiple competitive-cooperative insurers and a reinsurer, IMA J. Manag. Math., 35 (2024), 651–692. https://doi.org/10.1093/imaman/dpad012 doi: 10.1093/imaman/dpad012
|
| [21] |
L. Chen, Y. Shen, On a new paradigm of optimal reinsurance: a stochastic Stackelberg differential game between an insurer and a reinsurer, ASTIN Bull., 48 (2018), 905–960. https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2018.3 doi: 10.1017/asb.2018.3
|
| [22] |
Y. Zhang, C. Zhang, Stackelberg differential reinsurance and investment game for a dependent risk model with Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process, Stat. Probab. Lett., 214 (2024), 110–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2024.110223 doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2024.110223
|
| [23] |
D. Li, V. R. Young, Stackelberg differential game for reinsurance: Mean-variance framework and random horizon, Insur.: Math. Econ., 102 (2022), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.11.006 doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.11.006
|
| [24] |
G. Zhou, Q. Zhang, L. Zhong, Robust reinsurance and investment strategies with bounded memory in a stochastic Stackelberg differential game, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 21 (2025), 6760–6793. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2025148 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2025148
|
| [25] |
D. Hu, G. Yang, H. Wang, Reinsurance contracts under Stackelberg game and market equilibrium, RAIRO-Oper. Res., 58 (2024), 3675–3696. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2024155 doi: 10.1051/ro/2024155
|
| [26] |
Y. Bai, Z. Zhou, H. Xiao, R. Gao, A Stackelberg reinsurance-investment game with asymmetric information and delay, Optim., 70 (2021), 2131–2168. https://doi.org/10.1080/02331934.2020.1777125 doi: 10.1080/02331934.2020.1777125
|
| [27] | W. Hao, Optimal investment and reinsurance strategies with credit risk under game framework, Doctoral dissertation, SWUFE, Chengdu, China, 2023. https://doi.org/10.27412/d.cnki.gxncu.2023.000032 |
| [28] |
J. Y. Cao, D. C. Li, V. R. Young, B. Zou, Stackelberg reinsurance chain under model ambiguity, Scand. Actuar. J., 4 (2024), 329–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/03461238.2023.2255399 doi: 10.1080/03461238.2023.2255399
|
| [29] |
X. Han, L. David, D. Li, Optimal reinsurance contract in a Stackelberg game framework: a view of social planner, Scand. Actuar. J., 2 (2024), 124–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/03461238.2023.2220219 doi: 10.1080/03461238.2023.2220219
|
| [30] |
P. Yang, Robust optimal reinsurance contracts with cooperation and competition, Syst. Eng. Theory Pract., 44 (2024), 563–578. https://doi.org/10.12011/SETP2022-2198 doi: 10.12011/SETP2022-2198
|
| [31] |
Y. Yuan, Z. Liang, X. Han, Robust reinsurance contract with asymmetric information in a stochastic Stackelberg differential game, Scand. Actuar. J., 4 (2022), 328–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/03461238.2021.1971756 doi: 10.1080/03461238.2021.1971756
|
| [32] |
G. Zhou, Z. Qiu, S. Li, A Stackelberg reinsurance-investment game under Heston's stochastic volatility model, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 19 (2023), 4350–4380. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2022133 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2022133
|
| [33] |
X. Luo, Q. Zhou, Stochastic differential games on robust optimal asset-liability management with delay under the CEV model, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 21 (2025), 1771–1796. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2024148 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2024148
|
| [34] | A. Sulem, B. Øksendal, Applied stochastic control of jump diffusions, Paris: Springer Cham, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-775850-3.50017-0 |
| [35] |
B. Zou, A. Cadenillas, Optimal investment and risk control policies for an insurer: Expected utility maximization, Insur.: Math. Econ., 58 (2014), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2014.06.006 doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2014.06.006
|
| [36] | R. C. Merton, C Robert, Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model, Stoch. Optim. Models Finance, 1975,621–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-780850-5.50052-6 |
| [37] |
M. Gu, Y. Yang, S. Li, J. Zhang, Constant elasticity of variance model for proportional reinsurance and investment strategies, Insur.: Math. Econ., 46 (2010), 580–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2010.03.001 doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2010.03.001
|
| [38] |
L. Li, Z. Qiu, The investment and reinsurance game on asset-liability management with common shock dependence under CEV model, RAIRO-Oper. Res., 59 (2025), 3913–3944. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2025152 doi: 10.1051/ro/2025152
|
| [39] |
G. E. Espinosa, N. Touzi, Optimal investment under relative performance concerns, Math. Finance, 25 (2015), 221–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/mafi.12034 doi: 10.1111/mafi.12034
|
| [40] |
A. Bensoussan, C. C. Siu, S. C. P. Yam, H. Yang, A class of non-zero-sum stochastic differential investment and reinsurance games, Automat., 50 (2014), 2025–2037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2014.05.033 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2014.05.033
|
| [41] |
K. Tan, P. Wei, W. Wei, S. Zhuang, Optimal dynamic reinsurance policies under a generalized Denneberg's absolute deviation principle, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 282 (2020), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.08.053 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.08.053
|
jimo-22-07-115-s001.pdf |
![]() |