Review Special Issues

Bacterial autoaggregation

  • Many bacteria, both environmental and pathogenic, exhibit the property of autoaggregation. In autoaggregation (sometimes also called autoagglutination or flocculation), bacteria of the same type form multicellular clumps that eventually settle at the bottom of culture tubes. Autoaggregation is generally mediated by self-recognising surface structures, such as proteins and exopolysaccharides, which we term collectively as autoagglutinins. Although a widespread phenomenon, in most cases the function of autoaggregation is poorly understood, though there is evidence to show that aggregating bacteria are protected from environmental stresses or host responses. Autoaggregation is also often among the first steps in forming biofilms. Here, we review the current knowledge on autoaggregation, the role of autoaggregation in biofilm formation and pathogenesis, and molecular mechanisms leading to aggregation using specific examples.

    Citation: Thomas Trunk, Hawzeen S. Khalil, Jack C. Leo. Bacterial autoaggregation[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(1): 140-164. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.1.140

    Related Papers:

    [1] Jasmine S. Ritschard, Lea Amato, Yadhu Kumar, Britta Müller, Leo Meile, Markus Schuppler . The role of the surface smear microbiome in the development of defective smear on surface-ripened red-smear cheese. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(4): 622-641. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.4.622
    [2] Tatyana V. Polyudova, Daria V. Eroshenko, Vladimir P. Korobov . Plasma, serum, albumin, and divalent metal ions inhibit the adhesion and the biofilm formation of Cutibacterium (Propionibacterium) acnes. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(1): 165-172. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.1.165
    [3] Almaris N. Alonso . Hydrophobic nature and effects of culture conditions on biofilm formation by the cellulolytic actinomycete Thermobifida fusca. AIMS Microbiology, 2015, 1(1): 1-10. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2015.1.1
    [4] Afraa Said Al-Adawi, Christine C. Gaylarde, Jan Sunner, Iwona B. Beech . Transfer of bacteria between stainless steel and chicken meat: A CLSM and DGGE study of biofilms. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(3): 340-358. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.3.340
    [5] Lucy McMullen, Steven T Leach, Daniel A Lemberg, Andrew S Day . Current roles of specific bacteria in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. AIMS Microbiology, 2015, 1(1): 82-91. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2015.1.82
    [6] Jan-Peter Hildebrandt . Pore-forming virulence factors of Staphylococcus aureus destabilize epithelial barriers-effects of alpha-toxin in the early phases of airway infection. AIMS Microbiology, 2015, 1(1): 11-36. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2015.1.11
    [7] Joseph O. Falkinham . Mycobacterium avium complex: Adherence as a way of life. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(3): 428-438. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.428
    [8] Yusuke Morita, Mai Okumura, Issay Narumi, Hiromi Nishida . Sensitivity of Deinococcus grandis rodZ deletion mutant to calcium ions results in enhanced spheroplast size. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(2): 176-185. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.2.176
    [9] Jessica Bannon, Mohammad Melebari, Cleso Jordao Jr, Carlos G Leon-Velarde, Keith Warriner . Incidence of Top 6 shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli within two Ontario beef processing facilities: Challenges in screening and confirmation testing. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(3): 278-291. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.3.278
    [10] Itziar Chapartegui-González, María Lázaro-Díez, Santiago Redondo-Salvo, Elena Amaro-Prellezo, Estefanía Esteban-Rodríguez, José Ramos-Vivas . Biofilm formation in Hafnia alvei HUMV-5920, a human isolate. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(4): 412-421. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.4.412
  • Many bacteria, both environmental and pathogenic, exhibit the property of autoaggregation. In autoaggregation (sometimes also called autoagglutination or flocculation), bacteria of the same type form multicellular clumps that eventually settle at the bottom of culture tubes. Autoaggregation is generally mediated by self-recognising surface structures, such as proteins and exopolysaccharides, which we term collectively as autoagglutinins. Although a widespread phenomenon, in most cases the function of autoaggregation is poorly understood, though there is evidence to show that aggregating bacteria are protected from environmental stresses or host responses. Autoaggregation is also often among the first steps in forming biofilms. Here, we review the current knowledge on autoaggregation, the role of autoaggregation in biofilm formation and pathogenesis, and molecular mechanisms leading to aggregation using specific examples.


    1. Introduction

    Corynebacterium diphtheriae, Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis and Corynebacterium ulcerans are, among others, pathogenic species of the genus Corynebacterium. Corynebacteria belong to the family Corynebacteriaceae within the order Actinomycetales and the phylum Actinobacteria [1]. Corynebacterium species can be found naturally in soil and water and are able to colonize the skin and mucous membranes of animals and humans. All are Gram-positive, aerobic, irregular or clubbed-shaped bacteria with high G + C content DNA [2,3]. The cell envelope of these bacteria comprises a plasma membrane covered by a peptidoglycan layer, which is covalently bound to arabinogalactan. On top of this, an additional outer layer of mycolic acids is found, which is functionally equivalent to the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria [4,5,6,7]. Corynebacteria are closely related to members of the genus Mycobacterium, Nocardia and Rhodococcus, which are referred to as the CMNR group [8,9,10,11]. These organisms are characterized by a complex cell wall structure, and high G + C content DNA. In contrast to Mycobacterium tuberculosis, corynomycolic acids may not be crucial in Corynebacterium host interaction [12]. Therefore, in corynebacterial pathogenicity, other determinants may have functions such as those of the trehalosyl-dimycolates of M. tuberculosis.

    C. diphtheriae is the classical etiological agent of diphtheria, an inflammatory disease of the upper respiratory tract, but also cases of cutaneous diphtheria occur. Additionally, systemic infections such as endocarditis, osteomyelitis, pneumonia and others are increasingly being reported [13,14,15]. Due to vaccination programs diphtheria is well controlled in Western countries but not totally eradicated [16,17,18]. Even after more than 20 years since the last large-scale outbreak in 1990s in the former states of the Soviet Union, diphtheria remains a severe public health problem, not only in less developed countries ([13,19] and references therein).

    C. pseudotuberculosis and C. ulcerans are as is C. diphtheriae potential carriers of the diphtheria toxin. The strains can be infected by tox gene-carrying corynebacteriophages that integrate into the bacterial genome [20,21,22,23]. Since the ability to produce the diphtheria toxin is a result of β-corynephages infection, for each species toxigenic as well as non-toxigenic strains exist. Regardless of the presence of the tox gene, all three species are able to adhere to epithelial cells in a strain-specific manner (Figure 1, unpublished data).

    Figure 1. SEM of C. diphtheriae ISS4060, C. ulcerans BR-AD22 and C. pseudotuberculosis FRC41 adhered to Detroit562 cells. Infection of Detroit562 cells with three different corynebacteria species for 90 min under cell culture conditions. Subsequently, cultures were fixed, dehydrated, sputtered with gold and examined using an FEI Quanta 200 scanning electron microscope (L. Ott, unpublished data).

    C. pseudotuberculosis causes caseous lymphadenitis in sheep and goats resulting in skin lesions and abscessed tissues with the consequence of severe economic losses in production of meat, milk and wool [24,25,26]. Additionally, C. pseudotuberculosis has also been isolated from horses, cattle, camels, buffalo and humans and zoonotic transmission can be assumed [26]. To date, no detailed information is available as to how this organism is able to adhere to host cells or how it gains access to deeper tissues. The most prominent virulence factor of C. pseudotuberculosis may be phospholipase D (PLD), a sphingomyelinase D that catalyzes the hydrolysis of phosphatidylcholine and cleaves ester bonds in sphingomyelins that are essential components of eukaryotic membranes [27,28,29]. Although C. pseudotuberculosis can harbor the DT encoding gene, no cases of classical respiratory or cutaneous diphtheria in humans caused by this species have been reported up to now.

    C. ulcerans was first isolated in 1927 from a patient with respiratory diphtheria-like illness [30], but this pathogenic bacterium has a wide range of hosts. C. ulcerans is commensal in wild and domestic animals and can cause mastitis in cattle [31,32,33]. Human infections with C. ulcerans are typically associated with the consumption of raw milk products or contact with farm animals, but also domestic animals such as cats and dogs are able to transmit C. ulcerans infections to humans [34,35,36]. Person-to-person transmission is rare, but cannot be excluded [37,38]. As already mentioned above, C. ulcerans can carry the gene encoding DT, and in contrast to C. pseudotuberculosis, this pathogen can cause classical respiratory as well as cutaneous diphtheria in humans [39]. Interestingly, from 102 cases of infections by toxigenic corynebacteria that have been reported in the UK between 1986 and 2008, 59 of the patients were infected by C. ulcerans, 42 with C. diphtheriae and only one with C. pseudotuberculosis [40]. The occurrence of severe C. diphtheriae and C. ulcerans infections in Western countries shows the need to learn more about the infection process of these emerging pathogens. To date, a limited number of factors, which are involved in the adhesion process of toxigenic corynebacteria, are known. This review will give a comprehensive overview about the adhesion properties of three toxigenic Corynebacterium species, showing that adhesion is a multi-factorial process relying on specific and general mechanisms.


    2. Adhesion, a multifactorial process


    2.1. Effect of iron-limitation on bacterial adherence

    It is known that iron restriction promotes lower growth rates of bacterial pathogens, but this may also stimulate these organisms to induce greater tissue damage, since the expression of many virulence factors is regulated by the iron supply in the environment. Iron limitation, for example, leads to slime production by Staphylococcus aureus [41] and Staphylococcus epidermidis [42], production of mucin-binding adhesins by Pseudomonas aeruginosa [43] in addition to hydrophobicity of and adherence to HEp-2 cells by Vibrio parahaemolyticus [44]. C. diphtheriae is also able to overcome low iron supply in the host cell, for example, by expressing genes encoding siderophores or other iron uptake systems [45,46]. Studies by Moreira and co-workers (2003) investigated the influence of low iron availability on the expression of proteins and surface sugar residues of toxigenic C. diphtheriae strains, as well as their adherence to human B erythrocytes and HEp-2 cells. It was found that the production of cell wall surface carbohydrates is inversely correlated with the iron concentration of the culture media [47]. Further, the expression of sialidases, which work as glycosyl hydrolases catalyzing the cleavage of terminal sialic acid residues from a variety of glycoconjugates, also correlates with iron depression [47,48]. In addition, by decorating their own cell surface with sialic acids from the host cell, the bacteria may be able to elude the host immune response that may otherwise rapidly clear an unsialyated strain [49]. Moreira's group identified a putative exo-sialidase NanH (DIP0543) in C. diphtheriae that shows trans-sialidase activity by using sialyl-α-2, 3-lactose and sialyl-α2, 6-lactose as donors [47]. NanH also presents a putative virulence determinant in C. ulcerans [50]. C. ulcerans produces high levels of sialidase when introduced into the skin of small rodents leading to rapidly purulent lesions [51].

    In order to address the influence of iron limitation on adhesiveness, Moreira and co-workers cultivated two different C. diphtheriae strains, CDC-E8392 and 241, under iron-limited conditions (TSB-Fe). Strain 241 showed dramatically enhanced adhesion rates to HEp-2 cells in iron-limited medium, while strain CDC-E8392 showed no significant changes in adherence when cultivated in TSB-Fe medium, compared to standard TSB conditions. Moreover, a strongly reduced number of viable bacteria in TSB-Fe medium for strain CDC-E8293 were observed, which could be explained by medium sensitivity for this strain but needs further investigation [47]. However, no specific iron regulated genes that are involved in adherence of any toxigenic Corynebacterium species are characterized until now. In summary, the availability of iron in the culture medium seems to have a significant influence on the expression of a variety of pathogenic bacterial genes, and may therefore have an effect on the adhesion ability of microorganisms.


    2.2. Lipoarabinomannan

    The cell wall of C. diphtheriae is composed of branched long-chain mycolic acids and other lipoglycans such as lipomannans (LM) and lipoarabinomannans (LAM) [52]. Several studies discussed LAMs, such as the mannosylated LAM of M. tuberculosis (ManLAM), as virulence factors of pathogenic bacteria [53]. Besides the capacity to induce production of interleukin-12 and apoptosis in macrophages, ManLAM is able to induce granuloma formation of multinucleated giant cells [54,55]. Moreira and co-workers were able to purify a LAM-like molecule from C. diphtheriae (CdiLAM) [56]. The detailed carbohydrate analysis of CdiLAM revealed an unusual substitution at position 4 of the α-1→6-mannan backbone by α-D-Araf. Variations in the substituting arabinan domains are already known, for example, for ReqLAM of Rhodococcus equi, RruLAM of Rhodococcus ruber and TotLAM of Turicella otitidis [57,58,59]. In the case of CdiLAM, Moreira and co-workers could not show hemagglutination of human B erythrocytes. Further, strain 241 showed reduced ability to adhere to HEp-2 cells when the bacteria were pre-incubated with rabbit polyclonal antibody anti-CdiLAM, and when HEp-2 cells were pre-incubated with purified CdiLAM, inhibited bacterial adherence was observed [56]. Based on these results, Moreira and co-workers postulated that the CdiLAM is acting as an adhesin only in the initial step of infection (30 min post infection), which leads then to the expression of additional bacterial adhesins or host cell receptors.


    2.3. Function of pili in colonization of host cells

    Proteinaceous filaments such as pili are known to play a role in bacterial adherence. Pili structures of Gram-positive bacteria are covalently linked to the peptidoglycan layer of the cell wall [60]. Genomic analysis of C. diphtheriae revealed the identification of three distinct pili clusters (spaABC, spaDEF, spaGHI) together with five sortase-encoding genes (srtA–E), which are essential for pilus assembly [61]. The major pilin proteins (SpaA, SpaD and SpaH, respectively) carry an LPxTG motif at the C-terminus, which is recognized by an additional housekeeping sortase, SrtF, for cell wall anchoring [62,63,64]. Mandlik and co-workers gave a detailed overview about the assembly and the function of pili in host colonization [65]. Briefly, by using a number of corynebacterial mutant strains in host cell interaction studies it was shown that only SpaA-type pili contribute to adherence of C. diphtheriae to the human pharyngeal carcinoma cell line Detroit 562 (D562). In contrast, SpaD and SpaH-type pili seem to be involved in adherence to the human laryngeal carcinoma cell line HEp-2 and the human lung carcinoma cell line A549 [66]. In the absence of the pilus shaft (SpaA), the minor pili SpaD and SpaH are linked directly to the surface due to their LPxTG motif, which is recognized by sortase SrtA. Similar results were obtained for other Gram-positive bacteria such as Streptococcus agalactiae, showing that adhesion to human lung and cervix epithelial cells is implemented by minor pilin proteins [67]. Interestingly, deletion of different pili subunits does not lead to the total loss of adhesion ability of the investigated strains, indicating that other factors may be involved in the adhesion process [66]. Furthermore, different C. diphtheriae isolates vary dramatically in their ability to adhere to human epithelial cells such as D562 cells [68]. In order to address these variations in adhesion rates, Ott and co-workers investigated the correlation between pilus expression and adhesion efficiency. Ultrastructural analysis of seven wild type strains revealed strain-specific differences in pili formation. Strain ISS4060 completely lacks pili structures, while strain ISS3319 possesses spike-like pili. Interestingly, both strains show comparable adhesion rates [68]. This indicates that pili formation and adhesion are not strictly coupled. Based on RNA hybridization and immunoblotting experiments, Ott and co-workers detected isolate-specific differences in the expression pattern of pili subunits. All strains seem to carry the genes for the spaABC cluster, but in contrast to strain NCTC13129, which expresses three pili clusters (spaABC, spaDEF and spaGHI), none of the investigated strains harbored the spaDEF cluster. Only two strains, ISS4746 and ISS4749, encode the genes for spaABC and spaGHI, thereby expressing a high level of spaA and spaH, which could be crucial for pili length [68]. Recent pan-genomic studies of 20 C. diphtheriae sequences by [69] confirmed the data of Ott et al. (2010) [68] and Trost et al. (2012) [70], showing that the numbers and organization of spa operons varies between strains [68,69,70]. Comparative analysis of new gene sequences of four strains (ISS3319, ISS4060, ISS4746, ISS4749) previously investigated by Ott and co-workers (2010) [68] revealed that the SpaD and SpaH gene clusters are present in all four strains, whilst an additional cluster SpaA is present in ISS4746 and ISS4749 [69]. This may correlate with the observed differences in number and length of the pili [68]. In strain ISS3319 only the SpaD cluster seems to be fully functional, which also may explain the relatively low number of pili in this strain, compared to ISS4749 [68,69]. Based on observations by Ott and co-workers, later studies from Broadway and co-workers characterized 42 clinical isolates with regard to toxigenicity and pili expression by PCR and immunoblotting with antibodies directed against different pili subunits [71]. The strains were separated into seven groups, depending on the presence of the diphtheria toxin as well as the respective pilus gene. Broadway and co-workers' observations were similar to those of Ott and co-workers (2010) for different isolates. First, the presence of pilus genes varies considerably between different wild types; second, it is independent of the presence of the tox gene; and third, the SpaA-type is the pilus most represented in the investigated strains [68,71]. In addition, Broadway and co-workers could confirm data reported previously by Mandlik and co-workers (2007) [66], which showed that isolates of subgroups that express SpaA-type pili exhibit significant adhesion to D562 cells [71]. Similar observations concerning the variations between pilus gene clusters were made for C. pseudotuberculosis in pan-genomic studies [72,73]. Genetic analysis of two C. ulcerans isolates (BR-AD22 and 809) led to the identification of two gene clusters encoding adhesive pili structures as well as the genes coding for sortases SrtB and SrtC and the housekeeping sortase SrtF [50]. Compared to C. diphtheriae NCTC13129, one cluster is genetically identical to the spaDEF cluster, while another one lacks the genes for the major pilin subunit spaA of the spaABC cluster. To date, no detailed information is available about the expression and the role of pili subunits in the adhesion process of C. ulcerans. In summary, C. diphtheriae, C. pseudotuberculosis and C. ulcerans isolates exhibit a wide genetic diversity concerning the presence or/and expression of various pili gene clusters [50,70,73]. The reason for this still remains unclear. The fact that different pili types attach to different cell types in a specific manner indicates that this may be connected to different receptors on the host's surface or different animal reservoirs. However, pili seem to be specific adhesion factors, but they are not encoded only by pathogenic bacteria. Pilus proteins are also found in non-pathogenic Corynebacterium species such as C. casei, C. efficiens, C. glutamicum and others, and consequently seem not to be virulence factors strictly speaking.


    2.4. The role of NlpC/P60 family proteins in adhesion

    NlpC/P60 proteins belong to a large superfamily of proteins that are found in bacteria, RNA viruses, bacteriophages and eukaryotes. These proteins show a wide range of functions working as invasion-associated proteins, putative lipoproteins, cell wall hydrolases or putative endopeptidases [74]. Several members of this superfamily are conserved among corynebacteria. In this context, Hansmeier and co-workers initially predicted the function of DIP1621 as an invasion-associated protein, homologous to Cg2401 of Corynebacterium glutamicum [75]. By using Tn5 transposon mutagenesis of C. diphtheriae strain 225 and subsequent adhesion experiments with human epithelial cells (HEp-2), Kolodkina and co-workers identified one mutant that showed a strongly reduced adhesion efficiency compared to the wild type strain. Sequence analysis of the interrupted part of this mutant revealed the gene encoding DIP1621, indicating that this gene obviously might play a role in adhesion to epithelial cells [76]. Ott and co-workers made similar observations for another member of the NlpC/P60 family, DIP1281 [77]. The corresponding mutant strain showed reduced adherence to and invasion into the host cell. Unfortunately, the investigators were not able to generate a complementation strain, which might be due to the structural alterations on the surface of the mutant. The mutant exhibited an increased cell size and the formation of chains of cells. Furthermore, immunofluorescence microscopy with an antiserum directed against the surface proteome of C. diphtheriae showed an uneven, speckled staining of the mutant compared to the wild type. Due to these structural changes of the mutant strain, the reduced adhesion rate may be considered as a secondary effect [77]. In a pool of protein precursors from C. ulcerans, homologs of DIP1621 and DIP1281were found that represent putative molecules involved in adhesion of this microorganism, but thus far, no studies on further characterization exist [50].


    2.5. Binding to extracellular matrix proteins

    Proteins of the extracellular space of eukaryotic cells, such as collagen, fibronectin, laminin and elastin, constitute characteristic targets of microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs) of pathogenic bacteria [78]. It is assumed that the presence of collagen or hyaluronan in wounds may have significant influence on the attachment and biofilm formation of notorious biofilm producers, such as methicillin-resistant P. aeruginosa or S. aureus (MRSA) [79]. Also for C. diphtheriae, binding to collagen as well as to fibronectin was observed [80]. Peixoto and co-workers recently characterized the protein DIP2093 with regard to its role in the virulence of C. diphtheriae. Bioinformatics analysis of this protein revealed structural similarity to SdrD protein from S. aureus, which plays an important role in the adherence of S. aureus to the extracellular matrix (ECM) and in biofilm formation. Furthermore, the DIP2093 sequence seems to be highly conserved among many strains of C. diphtheriae, C. pseudotuberculosis and C. ulcerans [81]. Peixoto and co-workers successfully generated a DIP2093 mutant strain, which was investigated in comparison to its parental strain NCTC13129 with respect to its influence on collagen-binding as well as its interaction with human epithelial cells. Peixoto and co-workers could show that DIP2093 is involved in binding to Type Ⅰ, but not to Type Ⅳ, collagen [81]. The data also revealed that binding to Type Ⅰ collagen was not totally reduced in the mutant strain, indicating that DIP2093 is not alone in acting as a MSCRAMM in C. diphtheriae. In order to address the role of DIP2093 in the adhesion process to epithelial cells, infection assays with HeLa cells were carried out. The mutant strain showed significantly reduced adhesion rates to HeLa cells compared to the wild type. Additionally, partial complementation of the mutation was achieved. To confirm these results, in vivo studies using mice as a mammalian model system were performed, showing that the mutant strain causes less severe symptoms in the carpus and no sign of inflammation in the tarsus. In contrast, the wild type strain NCTC13129 caused clear symptoms of arthritis and osteomyelitis [81]. This data demonstrated that the DIP2093 protein is not only involved in collagen-binding but also in host colonization.

    Fibrinogen is one of the major proteins of human plasma. The enzymatic cross-linking of fibrinogen to fibrin monomers leads to the polymerization of fibrin that covers a wound site. Fibrinogen synthesis is upregulated during inflammation or systemic infections; therefore, it is conceivable that human pathogenic organisms are able to interact with those proteins [82]. Additionally, another protein that is found in soluble form in many blood fluids and in an insoluble form on cells surfaces, membranes and extracellular matrices is fibronectin. Fibronectin is able to bind fibrinogen, fibrin, collagen, human and bacterial cells and might serve as a receptor in bacterial adherence [83,84,85,86]. Simpson-Louredo and co-workers performed investigations on C. ulcerans concerning its ability to bind human plasma fibrinogen, fibronectin and Type Ⅰ collagen [87]. The strains used for this study were isolated from a human fatal pulmonary infection and asymptomatic dogs. The investigated strains were able to bind to fibrinogen, fibronectin and Type Ⅰ collagen in a strain-specific manner. Thereby, the human isolate C. ulcerans 809 showed the lowest ability to bind the ECM and plasma proteins, while strain BR-AD22, isolated from a dog, exhibited the highest levels of binding to ECM/plasma proteins [87]. One reason might be differences in qualitative and quantitative expression of bacterial adhesins that bind fibrinogen, fibronectin and Type Ⅰ collagen, leading to variations in the virulence potential of the bacterium [80].


    2.6. Multi-functional protein DIP0733

    In order to address the molecular mechanism of adherence in more detail, a protein of C. diphtheriae known as non-fimbrial protein 67-72p became a focal point of research for several groups. Colombo and co-workers (2001) first described this protein as 67-72p, since two polypeptide bands of 67 and 72 kDa were detected by Western blot analysis. Both polypeptides are able to bind human erythrocytes receptors [88]. By using anti-67-72p IgG antibodies, the binding not only to human erythrocytes but also to HEp-2 cells (human epidermoid laryngeal carcinoma cells) was effectively blocked [88,89]. In 2012, Sabbadini and co-workers performed comparative MALDI-TOF MS analysis of 67-72p from strain CDCE-E8392 with an in silico proteome of this strain. This led to the identification of 67-72p as DIP0733 protein, which was initially a hypothetical protein. DIP0733 comprises seven aminoterminal transmembrane helices and a long carboxyterminal segment [90]. A corresponding mutant strain was characterized in host-pathogen interaction studies [91]. The mutant showed a significantly reduced ability to adhere to HeLa cells compared to the parental strain CDC-E8392. Additionally, the complementation strain reached a 7-fold higher adhesion rate to epithelial cells than the corresponding empty vector control strain. In a nematode infection model system, the DIP0733 mutant lost the ability to colonize the gut of C. elegans almost completely, while the wild type strain showed persistent colonization all over the gut. Finally, Antunes and co-workers (2015) confirmed data from Sabbadini and colleagues that C. diphtheriae can interact with collagen and fibrinogen [80,91]. They provided evidence that DIP0733 protein is involved in these processes but is not exclusively responsible for it. Due to its multi-functional properties, DIP0733 plays an important role in the virulence of C. diphtheriae and needs to be further investigated. In contrast, the function of the DIP0733 homolog CULC22_00609 of C. ulcerans BR-AD22 is barely understood. Hacker and co-workers were able to generate a CULC22_00609 mutant strain, which showed no significant difference in its interaction with epithelial cells compared to the wild type [92].


    2.7. Colonization of epithelial cells

    Many data exist concerning the ability of C. diphtheriae wild type strains to interact with different epithelial cells, such as HeLa, HEp-2, D562 and A549, but only a few proteins involved in the adhesion process are known thus far (Table 1).

    Table 1. Experimentally verified factors involved in the adhesion process of C. diphtheriae.
    Name Function Reference
    SpaA type pili adherence to HEp-2, A549 and D562 cells [66,68]
    NanH (DIP0543) sialidase activity [47,93]
    CDiLAM adherence to HEp-2 cells [56]
    DIP1621 adherence to HEp-2 cells [76]
    67-72p (DIP0733) hemagglutination adherence to HEp-2 cells and HeLa cells collagen and fibrinogen-binding colonization of C. elegans [88,89,91]
    DIP1546 colonization of C. elegans adherence to D562 cells [94]
    DIP2093 binding to type Ⅰ collagen adherence to HeLa cells [81]
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In a comparative analysis of the adhesion ability of different C. diphtheriae isolates to epithelial cells, the strains show strain-specific differences. Remarkably, the adhesion rates are not only strain specific but also cell line specific (Table 2 and Figure 2).

    Table 2. Strain-specific and cell line-specific adhesion rates of different C. diphtheriae wild type strains. Different cell lines were infected with C. diphtheriae wild type strains, washed, detached, lysed and CFU were determined. The ratio of bacteria used for infection (number of colonies on inoculum plates) and bacteria in the lysate (number of colonies on the lysate plates) multiplied by 100 gave the adhesion rate in percent. Values over 100% are the result of proliferating bacteria during infection.
    Strain Cell line Time post infection [min] Adhesion rate [%] (rounded values) Reference
    ATCC27010 HeLa 90 6 [96]
    ATCC27012 HeLa 90 4 [96]
    BR-INCA5015 HeLa 90 10 [96]
    CDC-E8392 HEp-2 120 30 [89]
    HeLa 90 25 [91]
    NCTC13129 A549 60 20 [66]
    D562 60 9
    HEp-2 60 25
    HeLa 90 9 [81]
    241 HEp-2 120 30 [47]
    ISS3319 D562 90 4 [95]
    HeLa 90 60
    ISS4060 D562 90 4 [95]
    HeLa 90 70
    ISS4746 D562 90 7 [95]
    HeLa 90 40
    ISS4749 D562 90 7 [95]
    HeLa 90 55
    DSM43988 D562 90 1 [95]
    HeLa 90 70
    DSM43989 D562 90 0.5 [95]
    HeLa 90 1
    DSM44123 D562 90 2 [95]
    HeLa 90 40
    INCA-402 D562 90 16 L. Ott, unpublished
    HeLa 90 160
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 2. Adhesion pattern of C. diphtheriae to HeLa (A) and Detroit562 (D562) cells (B). C. diphtheriae shows not only strain-specific but also cell line specific adhesion rates [95]. The adhesion rate to Hela cells is up to 10-fold higher and the pattern is more localized compared to D562 cells. After 90 min of infection up to 70% of bacteria used for infection adhere to HeLa cells, while an adhesion rate of < 8% to D562 cells is observable.

    Thus, most strains show an up to 10-fold higher adhesion rate to HeLa cells than to D562 cells [95]. Since the molecules on the host's surface that interact with C. diphtheriae are largely unknown, further investigations have to carried out to identify not only potential adhesion factors of C. diphtheriae but also the receptor on the host's surface.

    To the best of our knowledge, Hacker and co-workers published the first scanning electron microscopy as well as fluorescence microscopy images of C. ulcerans 809 and BR-AD22 infecting D562 and HeLa cells [92]. Independent of the cell line, the two strains showed a clustered adhesion pattern, which was not a consequence of bacterial aggregation in culture medium but may rather indicate accumulation of receptors in this area. Hirata and co-workers had already observed a similar type of adhesion pattern for toxigenic C. diphtheriae strains to HEp-2 cells [89]. Furthermore, Hacker and co-workers presented the first quantitative data that is available to date about the adhesion efficiency of C. ulcerans strains. Strain 809 showed comparable results independent of the cell line, while strain BR-AD22 exhibited a fivefold higher rate to HeLa cells compared to D562 cells. The data also revealed that the investigated strains are able to multiply during in vitro infection. In conclusion, the adhesion of C. ulcerans 809 is almost identical to both cell lines, whilst strain BR-AD22 shows strain-specific and cell line-specific adhesion rates [92]. Compared to C. diphtheriae, C. ulcerans adhesion to epithelial cells is up to fivefold higher, which probably hints at the high virulence potential of C. ulcerans. However, the basic mechanism and specific virulence determinants that are involved in the adhesion process of C. ulcerans are unknown thus far.

    To date, not much data exists concerning adherence of C. pseudotuberculosis to host cells. Valdivia and co-workers first published results regarding the ability of three different C. pseudotuberculosis isolates from goats and sheep and one reference strain from the Spanish Type Culture Collection, to adhere to ovine embryonic kidney cells (FLK-BLV-044 cells) [94]. The strains showed no significant strain-specific difference in adhesion rates. In comparison with experiments carried out by Ott and co-workers with different C. diphtheriae isolates and D562 or HeLa cells, C. pseudotuberculosis showed significantly lower adhesion rates of approximately 1.5–2.0% [95,97]. One reason may be, that FLK-BLV-044 cells are not the main target of C. pseudotuberculosis, and the usage of different cell lines could lead to deviating results, which could provide more information about the infection process of C. pseudotuberculosis.


    2.8. Caenorhabditis elegans as an in vivo model system

    The standard in vivo model systems that were successfully established for pathogenic corynebacteria, such as guinea-pigs and mice [15,39,98,99], offer several disadvantages, for example, high costs, cumbersome handling and ethical issues. Therefore, the aim of Ott and co-workers was to identify a non-mammalian model system that allows high throughput screening and testing of mutant strains [94]. The small nematode C. elegans turned out to be an attractive organism substituting for small rodents for the study of pathogenic corynebacteria. In microscopic analysis, all of the investigated wild type strains of C. diphtheriae, C. pseudotuberculosis and C. ulcerans showed colonization of the gut of the worms, but the localization differed between the strains. Thus, strain C. diphtheriae ISS3319 was detected in the foregut (buccal cavity and pharynx) and the midgut, and strain C. diphtheriae DSM43988 was found in the midgut, C. diphtheriae DSM43989 and C. ulcerans 809 were localized in the hindgut of the worm. Strains C. ulcerans BR-AD22 and C. pseudotuberculosis FRC41 spread throughout the body [94,100]. Additionally, nematode killing assays revealed strain-specific differences in the virulence of the strains. As proof of principle, Ott and co-workers tested two mutant strains, one transposon mutant inserted in gene dip1546 of C. diphtheriae ISS3319, and the PLD mutant of C. ulcerans BR-AD22. The dip1546 mutant was drastically impaired to colonize the gut of C. elegans when compared to its parental strain. This data was supported by additional adhesion assays to D562 cells, which resulted in an almost complete loss of the adhesion rate of the mutant strain. In contrast, the PLD mutant of C. ulcerans showed no changes in gut colonization of C. elegans, which was in accordance with data observed in adhesion assays of D562 cells [94].

    As a second study, Antunes and co-workers tested the DIP0733 mutant strain in comparison to its parental strain CDC-E8392 in the C. elegans model [91]. Indeed, the mutant strain was only scarcely detectable, while the wild type strain was localized throughout the gut. The overexpression of DIP0733 in the mutant partially complemented this defect. This data was confirmed by the nematode killing assay, in which the wild type and overexpression strain exhibited a severe detrimental effect on the worms, while the mutant had almost no impact on their viability [91]. These results highlight once again the high virulence potential of the DIP0733 protein.


    3. Conclusions

    Adhesion to the host cell was mainly considered to be the initial step in host-pathogen interaction. However, in the case of different C. diphtheriae isolates, it was shown that strains that are able to adhere to the host cell do not consequently invade the cell, and vice versa [95]. This indicates that adhesion and invasion are not coupled processes, and adhesion may not be obligatory for a pathogenic organism to display full virulence. As mentioned earlier, the pathogenicity of C. diphtheriae, C. pseudotuberculosis and C. ulcerans is not very well characterized at the molecular level. There are several factors known thus far that may contribute to adhesion to human tissues, but the lack of most of these proteins does not lead to the total loss of the adhesion ability. Figure 3 summarizes the known determinants that contribute to C. diphtheriae adherence.

    Figure 3. Adhesion of C. diphtheriae: a multi-factorial process. C. diphtheriae is able to bind different epithelial cell types in a strain-specific manner. A number of proteins involved in this process have been identified thus far, emphasizing the complexity of this event. Nevertheless, the deletion or disruption of one of these proteins, does not lead to a complete loss of the adhesion ability, indicating that a combination of proteins may be crucial for this event. C. diphtheriae carries genes for proteins that are termed as MSCRAMMS, due to their ability to mediate attachment to fibrinogen or collagen. Furthermore, C. diphtheriae is also able to bind human erythrocytes. Due to this capability, C. diphtheriae may be able to spread throughout the whole body via the blood stream.

    These proteins might have a function in pathogenicity but work in combination with other proteins or toxins under certain environmental conditions. This makes sense considering that Corynebacterium species can be isolated from a wide range of ecological niches, such as synthetic surfaces, food, water, soil, animals and humans as well as others [1]. Therefore, adherence of pathogenic corynebacteria may not be a specific mechanism, but rather a more general event in host-pathogen interaction. In this regard, adhesion can be considered a multi-factorial process and proteins involved in this process can be designated as niche factors rather than virulence determinants [101,102].


    Acknowledgements

    SEM pictures were taken at BioCer Entwicklungs-GmbH (Bayreuth, Germany) with the kind support of Dr. Kristin Hasselt. Anja Mumesohn kindly provided Figure 3.


    Conflict of interest

    The author declares no conflicts of interest in this paper.


    [1] Sorroche FG, Spesia MB, Zorreguieta A, et al. (2012) A positive correlation between bacterial autoaggregation and biofilm formation in native Sinorhizobium meliloti isolates from Argentina. Appl Environ Microb 78: 4092–4101. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07826-11
    [2] Kragh KN, Hutchison JB, Melaugh G, et al. (2016) Role of multicellular aggregates in biofilm formation. MBio 7: e00237-16.
    [3] Corno G, Coci M, Giardina M, et al. (2014) Antibiotics promote aggregation within aquatic bacterial communities. Front Microbiol 5: 297.
    [4] Ochiai K, Kurita-Ochiai T, Kamino Y, et al. (1993) Effect of co-aggregation on the pathogenicity of oral bacteria. J Med Microbiol 39: 183–190. doi: 10.1099/00222615-39-3-183
    [5] Malik A, Sakamoto M, Hanazaki S, et al. (2003) Coaggregation among nonflocculating bacteria isolated from activated sludge. Appl Environ Microb 69: 6056–6063. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.10.6056-6063.2003
    [6] Farrell A, Quilty B (2002) Substrate-dependent autoaggregation of Pseudomonas putida CP1 during the degradation of mono-chlorophenols and phenol. J Ind Microbiol Biot 28: 316–324. doi: 10.1038/sj.jim.7000249
    [7] McLean JS, Pinchuk GE, Geydebrekht OV, et al. (2008) Oxygen-dependent autoaggregation in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. Environ Microbiol 10: 1861–1876. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01608.x
    [8] Schembri MA, Hjerrild L, Gjermansen M, et al. (2003) Differential expression of the Escherichia coli autoaggregation factor antigen 43. J Bacteriol 185: 2236–2242. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.7.2236-2242.2003
    [9] Skurnik M, Bölin I, Heikkinen H, et al. (1984) Virulence plasmid-associated autoagglutination in Yersinia spp. J Bacteriol 158: 1033–1036.
    [10] Bossier P, Verstraete W (1996) Triggers for microbial aggregation in activated sludge? Appl Microbiol Biot 45: 1–6. doi: 10.1007/s002530050640
    [11] Haaber J, Cohn MT, Frees D, et al. (2012) Planktonic aggregates of Staphylococcus aureus protect against common antibiotics. PLoS One 7: e41075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041075
    [12] Tree JJ, Ulett GC, Hobman JL, et al. (2007) The multicopper oxidase (CueO) and cell aggregation in Escherichia coli. Environ Microbiol 9: 2110–2116. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01320.x
    [13] Fexby S, Bjarnsholt T, Jensen PØ, et al. (2006) Biological Trojan horse: Antigen 43 provides specific bacterial uptake and survival in human neutrophils. Infect Immun 75: 30–34.
    [14] Galdiero F, Carratelli CR, Nuzzo I, et al. (1988) Phagocytosis of bacterial aggregates by granulocytes. Eur J Epidemiol 4: 456–460. doi: 10.1007/BF00146398
    [15] Meuskens I, Michalik M, Chauhan N, et al. (2017) A new strain collection for improved expression of outer membrane proteins. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7: 464. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00464
    [16] Formosa-Dague C, Feuillie C, Beaussart A, et al. (2016) Sticky matrix: adhesion mechanism of the staphylococcal polysaccharide intercellular adhesin. ACS Nano 10: 3443–3452. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b07515
    [17] Guerry P (2007) Campylobacter flagella: not just for motility. Trends Microbiol 15: 456–461. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2007.09.006
    [18] Das T, Sharma PK, Busscher HJ, et al. (2010) Role of extracellular DNA in initial bacterial adhesion and surface aggregation. Appl Environ Microb 76: 3405–3408. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03119-09
    [19] Arenas J, Cano S, Nijland R, et al. (2014) The meningococcal autotransporter AutA is implicated in autoaggregation and biofilm formation. Environ Microbiol 17: 1321–1337.
    [20] Ishikawa M, Nakatani H, Hori K (2012) AtaA, a new member of the trimeric autotransporter adhesins from Acinetobacter sp. Tol 5 mediating high adhesiveness to various abiotic surfaces. PLoS One 7: e48830.
    [21] Xiao L, Zhou L, Sun C, et al. (2012) Apa is a trimeric autotransporter adhesin of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae responsible for autoagglutination and host cell adherence. J Basic Microb 52: 598–607. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201100365
    [22] Inoue T, Tanimoto I, Ohta H, et al. (1998) Molecular characterization of low-molecular-weight component protein, Flp, in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans fimbriae. Microbiol Immunol 42: 253–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1998.tb02280.x
    [23] Riess T, Raddatz G, Linke D, et al. (2006) Analysis of Bartonella adhesin A expression reveals differences between various B. henselae strains. Infect Immun 75: 35–43.
    [24] Zhang P, Chomel BB, Schau MK, et al. (2004) A family of variably expressed outer-membrane proteins (Vomp) mediates adhesion and autoaggregation in Bartonella quintana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 13630–13635. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405284101
    [25] Menozzi FD, Boucher PE, Riveau G, et al. (1994) Surface-associated filamentous hemagglutinin induces autoagglutination of Bordetella pertussis. Infect Immun 62: 4261–4269.
    [26] Tomich M, Mohr CD (2003) Adherence and autoaggregation phenotypes of a Burkholderia cenocepacia cable pilus mutant. FEMS Microbiol Lett 228: 287–297. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00785-7
    [27] Boddey JA, Flegg CP, Day CJ, et al. (2006) Temperature-regulated microcolony formation by Burkholderia pseudomallei requires pilA and enhances association with cultured human cells. Infect Immun 74: 5374–5381. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00569-06
    [28] Guerry P, Ewing CP, Schirm M, et al. (2006) Changes in flagellin glycosylation affect Campylobacter autoagglutination and virulence. Mol Microbiol 60: 299–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05100.x
    [29] Hoeflinger JL, Miller MJ (2017) Cronobacter sakazakii ATCC 29544 autoaggregation requires FliC flagellation, not motility. Front Microbiol 8: 301.
    [30] Nataro JP, Deng Y, Maneval DR, et al. (1992) Aggregative adherence fimbriae I of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli mediate adherence to HEp-2 cells and hemagglutination of human erythrocytes. Infect Immun 60: 2297–2304.
    [31] Sherlock O, Schembri MA, Reisner A, et al. (2004) Novel roles for the AIDA adhesin from diarrheagenic Escherichia coli: cell aggregation and biofilm formation. J Bacteriol 186: 8058–8065. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.23.8058-8065.2004
    [32] Henderson IR, Meehan M, Owen P (1997) Antigen 43, a phase-variable bipartite outer membrane protein, determines colony morphology and autoaggregation in Escherichia coli K-12. FEMS Microbiol Lett 149: 115–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb10317.x
    [33] Bieber D, Ramer SW, Wu CY, et al. (1998) Type IV pili, transient bacterial aggregates, and virulence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Science 280: 2114. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5372.2114
    [34] Leo JC, Lyskowski A, Hattula K, et al. (2011) The structure of E. coli IgG-binding protein D suggests a general model for bending and binding in trimeric autotransporter adhesins. Structure 19: 1021–1030.
    [35] Fagan RP, Smith SGJ (2007) The Hek outer membrane protein of Escherichia coli is an auto-aggregating adhesin and invasin. FEMS Microbiol Lett 269: 248–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00628.x
    [36] Bhargava S, Johnson BB, Hwang J, et al. (2009) Heat-resistant agglutinin 1 is an accessory enteroaggregative Escherichia coli colonization factor. J Bacteriol 191: 4934–4942. doi: 10.1128/JB.01831-08
    [37] Sherlock O, Vejborg RM, Klemm P (2005) The TibA adhesin/invasin from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli is self recognizing and induces bacterial aggregation and biofilm formation. Infect Immun 73: 1954–1963. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.4.1954-1963.2005
    [38] Gao ZP, Nie P, Lu JF, et al. (2015) Type III secretion system translocon component EseB forms filaments on and mediates autoaggregation of and biofilm formation by Edwardsiella tarda. Appl Environ Microb 81: 6078–6087. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01254-15
    [39] Hendrixson DR, Geme JWS (1999) The Haemophilus influenzae Hap serine protease promotes adherence and microcolony formation, potentiated by a soluble host protein. Mol Cell 2: 841–850.
    [40] Pearson MM, Lafontaine ER, Wagner NJ, et al. (2002) A hag mutant of Moraxella catarrhalis strain O35E is deficient in hemagglutination, autoagglutination, and immunoglobulin D-binding activities. Infect Immun 70: 4523–4533. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.8.4523-4533.2002
    [41] Hevia A, Martínez N, Ladero V, et al. (2013) An extracellular Serine/Threonine-rich protein from Lactobacillus plantarum NCIMB 8826 is a novel aggregation-promoting factor with affinity to mucin. Appl Environ Microb 79: 6059–6066. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01657-13
    [42] Abdel-Nour M, Duncan C, Prashar A, et al. (2013) The Legionella pneumophila collagen-like protein mediates sedimentation, autoaggregation, and pathogen-phagocyte interactions. Appl Environ Microb 80: 1441–1454.
    [43] Wu SS, Wu J, Kaiser D (1997) The Myxococcus xanthus pilT locus is required for social gliding motility although pili are still produced. Mol Microbiol 23: 109–121. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.1791550.x
    [44] Park HS, Wolfgang M, van Putten JP, et al. (2001) Structural alterations in a type IV pilus subunit protein result in concurrent defects in multicellular behaviour and adherence to host tissue. Mol Microbiol 42: 293–307. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02629.x
    [45] Carbonnelle E, Helaine S, Nassif X, et al. (2006) A systematic genetic analysis in Neisseria meningitidis defines the Pil proteins required for assembly, functionality, stabilization and export of type IV pili. Mol Microbiol 61: 1510–1522. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05341.x
    [46] O'Toole GA, Kolter R (1998) Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Mol Microbiol 30: 295–304. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01062.x
    [47] Ausmees N, Jacobsson K, Lindberg M (2001) A unipolarly located, cell-surface-associated agglutinin, RapA, belongs to a family of Rhizobium-adhering proteins (Rap) in Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii. Microbiology 147: 549–559. doi: 10.1099/00221287-147-3-549
    [48] Collinson SK, Doig PC, Doran JL, et al. (1993) Thin, aggregative fimbriae mediate binding of Salmonella enteritidis to fibronectin. J Bacteriol 175: 12–18. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.1.12-18.1993
    [49] Kuroda M, Ito R, Tanaka Y, et al. (2008) Staphylococcus aureus surface protein SasG contributes to intercellular autoaggregation of Staphylococcus aureus. Biochem Bioph Res Co 377: 1102–1106. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.10.134
    [50] Rohde H, Burdelski C, Bartscht K, et al. (2005) Induction of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation via proteolytic processing of the accumulation-associated protein by staphylococcal and host proteases. Mol Microbiol 55: 1883–1895. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04515.x
    [51] Heilmann C, Schweitzer O, Gerke C, et al. (1996) Molecular basis of intercellular adhesion in the biofilm-forming Staphylococcus epidermidis. Mol Microbiol 20: 1083–1091. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02548.x
    [52] Frick IM, Mörgelin M, Björck L (2000) Virulent aggregates of Streptococcus pyogenes are generated by homophilic protein-protein interactions. Mol Microbiol 37: 1232–1247. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02084.x
    [53] Chiang SL, Taylor RK, Koomey M, et al. (1995) Single amino acid substitutions in the N-terminus of Vibrio cholerae TcpA affect colonization, autoagglutination, and serum resistance. Mol Microbiol 17: 1133–1142. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.mmi_17061133.x
    [54] Faris A, Lindahl M, Ljungh A, et al. (1983) Autoaggregating Yersinia enterocolitica express surface fimbriae with high surface hydrophobicity. J Appl Bacteriol 55: 97–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1983.tb02652.x
    [55] Mühlenkamp M, Oberhettinger P, Leo JC, et al. (2015) Yersinia adhesin A (YadA)-Beauty & beast. Int J Med Microbiol 305: 252–258. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.12.008
    [56] Kolodziejek AM, Sinclair DJ, Seo KS, et al. (2007) Phenotypic characterization of OmpX, an Ail homologue of Yersinia pestis KIM. Microbiology 153: 2941–2951. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2006/005694-0
    [57] Podladchikova O, Rykova V, Antonenka U, et al. (2012) Yersinia pestis autoagglutination is mediated by HCP-like protein and siderophore Yersiniachelin (Ych). Adv Exp Med Biol 954: 289–292. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3561-7_36
    [58] Felek S, Lawrenz MB, Krukonis ES (2008) The Yersinia pestis autotransporter YapC mediates host cell binding, autoaggregation and biofilm formation. Microbiology 154: 1802–1812. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/010918-0
    [59] Ojanen-Reuhs T, Kalkkinen N, Westerlund-Wikström B, et al. (1997) Characterization of the fimA gene encoding bundle-forming fimbriae of the plant pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. J Bacteriol 179: 1280–1290. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.4.1280-1290.1997
    [60] Busch A, Waksman G (2012) Chaperone-usher pathways: diversity and pilus assembly mechanism. Phil Trans R Soc B 367: 1112–1122. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0206
    [61] Van Gerven N, Klein RD, Hultgren SJ, et al. (2015) Bacterial amyloid formation: structural insights into curli biogensis. Trends Microbiol 23: 693–706. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.07.010
    [62] Craig L, Pique ME, Tainer JA (2004) Type IV pilus structure and bacterial pathogenicity. Nat Rev Microbiol 2: 363–378. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro885
    [63] Heilmann C (2011) Adhesion mechanisms of staphylococci. Adv Exp Med Biol 715: 105–123. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-0940-9_7
    [64] Smeesters PR, McMillan DJ, Sriprakash KS (2010) The streptococcal M protein: a highly versatile molecule. Trends Microbiol 18: 275–282. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2010.02.007
    [65] Glaubman J, Hofmann J, Bonney ME, et al. (2016) Self-association motifs in the enteroaggregative Escherichia coli heat-resistant agglutinin 1. Microbiology 162: 1091–1102. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000303
    [66] Leo JC, Grin I, Linke D (2012) Type V secretion: mechanism(s) of autotransport through the bacterial outer membrane. Phil Trans R Soc B 367: 1088–1101. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0208
    [67] Fan E, Chauhan N, Udatha DB, et al. (2016) Type V Secretion Systems in Bacteria. Microbiol Spectrum 4.
    [68] Nesta B, Spraggon G, Alteri C, et al. (2012) FdeC, a novel broadly conserved Escherichia coli adhesin eliciting protection against urinary tract infections. MBio 3: 1–10. doi: 10.3391/mbi.2012.3.1.01
    [69] Klemm P, Vejborg RM, Sherlock O (2006) Self-associating autotransporters, SAATs: functional and structural similarities. Int J Med Microbiol 296: 187–195. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2005.10.002
    [70] Balligand G, Laroche Y, Cornelis G (1985) Genetic analysis of virulence plasmid from a serogroup 9 Yersinia enterocolitica strain: role of outer membrane protein P1 in resistance to human serum and autoagglutination. Infect Immun 48: 782–786.
    [71] Misawa N, Blaser MJ (2000) Detection and characterization of autoagglutination activity by Campylobacter jejuni. Infect Immun 68: 6168–6175. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.11.6168-6175.2000
    [72] Klemm P, Hjerrild L, Gjermansen M, et al. (2003) Structure-function analysis of the self-recognizing Antigen 43 autotransporter protein from Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 51: 283–296. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03833.x
    [73] Montero DA, Velasco J, Del Canto F, et al. (2017) Locus of Adhesion and Autoaggregation (LAA), a pathogenicity island present in emerging Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains. Sci Rep 7: 7011. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06999-y
    [74] Del Re B, Sgorbati B, Miglioli M, et al. (2000) Adhesion, autoaggregation and hydrophobicity of 13 strains of Bifidobacterium longum. Lett Appl Microbiol 31: 438–442. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.00845.x
    [75] Beloin C, Houry A, Froment M, et al. (2008) A short-time scale colloidal system reveals early bacterial adhesion dynamics. PLoS Biol 6: e167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060167
    [76] Geng J, Henry N (2011) Short time-scale bacterial adhesion dynamics. Adv Exp Med Biol 715: 315–331. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-0940-9_20
    [77] Heras B, Totsika M, Peters KM, et al. (2014) The antigen 43 structure reveals a molecular Velcro-like mechanism of autotransporter-mediated bacterial clumping. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: 457–462. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311592111
    [78] Hoiczyk E, Roggenkamp A, Reichenbecher M, et al. (2000) Structure and sequence analysis of Yersinia YadA and Moraxella UspAs reveal a novel class of adhesins. EMBO J 19: 5989–5999. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.22.5989
    [79] Jonsson P, Wadström T (1984) Cell surface hydrophobicity of Staphylococcus aureus measured by the salt aggregation test (SAT). Curr Microbiol 10: 203–210. doi: 10.1007/BF01627256
    [80] Martinez R (1983) Plasmid-mediated and temperature-regulated surface properties of Yersinia enterocolitica. Infect Immun 41: 921–930.
    [81] Arenas J, Nijland R, Rodriguez FJ, et al. (2012) Involvement of three meningococcal surface-exposed proteins, the heparin-binding protein NhbA, the α-peptide of IgA protease and the autotransporter protease NalP, in initiation of biofilm formation. Mol Microbiol 87: 254–268.
    [82] Eboigbodin KE, Newton JRA, Routh AF, et al. (2005) Role of nonadsorbing polymers in bacterial aggregation. Langmuir 21: 12315–12319. doi: 10.1021/la051740u
    [83] Tsang TM, Wiese JS, Alhabeil JA, et al. (2017) Defining the Ail ligand-binding surface: hydrophobic residues in two extracellular loops mediate cell and extracellular matrix binding to facilitate Yop delivery. Infect Immun 85: e01047-15.
    [84] Kaiser PO, Riess T, Wagner CL, et al. (2008) The head of Bartonella adhesin A is crucial for host cell interaction of Bartonella henselae. Cell Microbiol 10: 2223–2234. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01201.x
    [85] Meng G, Spahich N, Kenjale R, et al. (2011) Crystal structure of the Haemophilus influenzae Hap adhesin reveals an intercellular oligomerization mechanism for bacterial aggregation. EMBO J 30: 3864–3874. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.279
    [86] Fink DL, Buscher AZ, Green B, et al. (2003) The Haemophilus influenzae Hap autotransporter mediates microcolony formation and adherence to epithelial cells and extracellular matrix via binding regions in the C-terminal end of the passenger domain. Cell Microbiol 5: 175–186. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2003.00266.x
    [87] Fink DL, Geme JWS (2003) Chromosomal expression of the Haemophilus influenzae Hap autotransporter allows fine-tuned regulation of adhesive potential via inhibition of intermolecular autoproteolysis. J Bacteriol 185: 1608–1615. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.5.1608-1615.2003
    [88] Wolska KI, Grudniak AM, Rudnicka Z, et al. (2016) Genetic control of bacterial biofilms. J Appl Genet 57: 225–238. doi: 10.1007/s13353-015-0309-2
    [89] O'Toole G, Kaplan HB, Kolter R (2000) Biofilm formation as microbial development. Annu Rev Microbiol 54: 49–79. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.49
    [90] Vaccari L, Molaei M, Niepa THR, et al. (2017) Films of bacteria at interfaces. Adv Colloid Interfac 247: 561–572. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2017.07.016
    [91] Flemming HC, Wingender J, Szewzyk U, et al. (2016) Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life. Nat Rev Microbiol 14: 563–575. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.94
    [92] Gupta P, Sarkar S, Das B (2015) Biofilm, pathogenesis and prevention-a journey to break the wall: a review. Arch Microbiol 198: 1–15.
    [93] Anderson GG, O'Toole GA (2008) Innate and induced resistance mechanisms of bacterial biofilms. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 322: 85–105.
    [94] Dunne WM Jr (2002) Bacterial adhesion: seen any good biofilms lately? Clin Microbiol Rev 15: 155–166. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.2.155-166.2002
    [95] Bos R, Mei HCVD, Busscher HJ (1999) Physico-chemistry of initial microbial adhesive interactions-its mechanisms and methods for study. FEMS Microbiol Rev 23: 179–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1999.tb00396.x
    [96] Melaugh G, Hutchison J, Kragh KN, et al. (2016) Shaping the growth behaviour of biofilms initiated from bacterial aggregates. PLoS One 11: e0149683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149683
    [97] Papenfort K, Bassler BL (2016) Quorum sensing signal-response systems in Gram-negative bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 14: 576–588. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.89
    [98] Laganenka L, Colin R, Sourjik V (2016) Chemotaxis towards autoinducer 2 mediates autoaggregation in Escherichia coli. Nat Commun 7: 12984. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12984
    [99] Bible AN, Stephens BB, Ortega DR, et al. (2008) Function of a chemotaxis-like signal transduction pathway in modulating motility, cell clumping, and cell length in the alphaproteobacterium Azospirillum brasilense. J Bacteriol 190: 6365–6375. doi: 10.1128/JB.00734-08
    [100] Bible A, Russell MH, Alexandre G (2012) The Azospirillum brasilense Che1 chemotaxis pathway controls swimming velocity, which affects transient cell-to-cell clumping. J Bacteriol 194: 3343–3355. doi: 10.1128/JB.00310-12
    [101] Hiramatsu Y, Saito M, Otsuka N, et al. (2016) BipA is associated with preventing autoagglutination and promoting biofilm formation in Bordetella holmesii. PLoS One 11: e0159999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159999
    [102] Ramalingam B, Sekar R, Boxall JB (2013) Aggregation and biofilm formation of bacteria isolated from domestic drinking water. Water Sci Tech-W Sup 13: 1016–1023. doi: 10.2166/ws.2013.115
    [103] Blom JF, Zimmermann YS, Ammann T, et al. (2010) Scent of danger: floc formation by a freshwater bacterium is induced by supernatants from a predator-prey coculture. Appl Environ Microb 76: 6156–6163. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01455-10
    [104] Hahn MW, Moore ERB, Höfle MG (2000) Role of microcolony formation in the protistan grazing defense of the aquatic bacterium Pseudomonas sp. MWH1. Microb Ecol 39: 175–185.
    [105] Nikel PI, Martínez-García E, de Lorenzo V (2014) Biotechnological domestication of pseudomonads using synthetic biology. Nat Rev Microbiol 12: 368–379. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3253
    [106] Klebensberger J, Rui O, Fritz E, et al. (2006) Cell aggregation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PAO1 as an energy-dependent stress response during growth with sodium dodecyl sulfate. Arch Microbiol 185: 417–427. doi: 10.1007/s00203-006-0111-y
    [107] Klebensberger J, Lautenschlager K, Bressler D, et al. (2007) Detergent-induced cell aggregation in subpopulations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a preadaptive survival strategy. Environ Microbiol 9: 2247–2259. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01339.x
    [108] Klebensberger J, Birkenmaier A, Geffers R, et al. (2009) SiaA and SiaD are essential for inducing autoaggregation as a specific response to detergent stress in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ Microbiol 11: 3073–3086. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02012.x
    [109] Hazelbauer GL, Falke JJ, Parkinson JS (2007) Bacterial chemoreceptors: high-performance signaling in networked arrays. Trends Biochem Sci 33: 9–19.
    [110] Aravind L, Ponting CP (1999) The cytoplasmic helical linker domain of receptor histidine kinase and methyl-accepting proteins is common to many prokaryotic signalling proteins. FEMS Microbiol Lett 176: 111–116. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13650.x
    [111] Matz C, Bergfeld T, Rice SA, et al. (2004) Microcolonies, quorum sensing and cytotoxicity determine the survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms exposed to protozoan grazing. Environ Microbiol 6: 218–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00556.x
    [112] Zhou P, Liu J, Merritt J, et al. (2015) A YadA-like autotransporter, Hag1 in Veillonella atypica is a multivalent hemagglutinin involved in adherence to oral streptococci, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and human oral buccal cells. Mol Oral Microbiol 30: 269–279. doi: 10.1111/omi.12091
    [113] Corno G, Villiger J, Pernthaler J (2013) Coaggregation in a microbial predator-prey system affects competition and trophic transfer efficiency. Ecology 94: 870–881. doi: 10.1890/12-1652.1
    [114] Caceres SM, Malcolm KC, Taylor-Cousar JL, et al. (2014) Enhanced in vitro formation and antibiotic resistance of nonattached Pseudomonas aeruginosa aggregates through incorporation of neutrophil products. Antimicrob Agents Ch 58: 6851–6860. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03514-14
    [115] Owen P, Meehan M, de Loughry-Doherty H, et al. (1996) Phase-variable outer membrane proteins in Escherichia coli. FEMS Immunol Med Mic 16: 63–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.1996.tb00124.x
    [116] Ulett GC, Valle J, Beloin C, et al. (2007) Functional analysis of antigen 43 in uropathogenic Escherichia coli reveals a role in long-term persistence in the urinary tract. Infect Immun 75: 3233–3244. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01952-06
    [117] Zalewska-Piatek B, Zalewska-Piatek R, Olszewski M, et al. (2015) Identification of antigen Ag43 in uropathogenic Escherichia coli Dr+ strains and defining its role in the pathogenesis of urinary tract infections. Microbiology 161: 1034–1049. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000072
    [118] Vo JL, Ortiz GCM, Subedi P, et al. (2017) Autotransporter adhesins in Escherichia coli pathogenesis. Proteomics: 1600431.
    [119] Valle J, Mabbett AN, Ulett GC, et al. (2008) UpaG, a new member of the trimeric autotransporter family of adhesins in uropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 190: 4147–4161. doi: 10.1128/JB.00122-08
    [120] Paton AW, Srimanote P, Woodrow MC, et al. (2001) Characterization of Saa, a novel autoagglutinating adhesin produced by locus of enterocyte effacement-negative Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli strains that are virulent for humans. Infect Immun 69: 6999–7009. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.11.6999-7009.2001
    [121] Totsika M, Wells TJ, Beloin C, et al. (2012) Molecular characterization of the EhaG and UpaG trimeric autotransporter proteins from pathogenic Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microb 78: 2179–2189. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06680-11
    [122] Lu Y, Iyoda S, Satou H, et al. (2006) A new immunoglobulin-binding protein, EibG, is responsible for the chain-like adhesion phenotype of locus of enterocyte effacement-negative, shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 74: 5747–5755. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00724-06
    [123] Moreira CG, Palmer K, Whiteley M, et al. (2006) Bundle-forming pili and EspA are involved in biofilm formation by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 188: 3952. doi: 10.1128/JB.00177-06
    [124] Personnic N, Striednig B, Hilbi H (2017) Legionella quorum sensing and its role in pathogen-host interactions. Curr Opin Microbiol 41: 29–35.
    [125] Yu VL, Plouffe JF, Pastoris MC, et al. (2002) Distribution of Legionella species and serogroups isolated by culture in patients with sporadic community-acquired legionellosis: an international collaborative survey. J Infect Dis 186: 127–128. doi: 10.1086/341087
    [126] Duncan C, Prashar A, So J, et al. (2011) Lcl of Legionella pneumophila is an immunogenic GAG binding adhesin that promotes interactions with lung epithelial cells and plays a crucial role in biofilm formation. Infect Immun 79: 2168–2181. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01304-10
    [127] Dehio C, Meyer M, Berger J, et al. (1997) Interaction of Bartonella henselae with endothelial cells results in bacterial aggregation on the cell surface and the subsequent engulfment and internalisation of the bacterial aggregate by a unique structure, the invasome. J Cell Sci 110: 2141–2154.
    [128] Moradali MF, Ghods S, Rehm BHA (2017) Pseudomonas aeruginosa lifestyle: a paradigm for adaptation, survival, and persistence. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7: 39.
    [129] Frederiksen B, Lanng S, Koch C, et al. (1996) Improved survival in the Danish center-treated cystic fibrosis patients: results of aggressive treatment. Pediatr Pulmonol 21: 153–158. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199603)21:3<153::AID-PPUL1>3.0.CO;2-R
    [130] Khan TZ, Wagener JS, Bost T, et al. (1995) Early pulmonary inflammation in infants with cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 151: 1075–1082.
    [131] Walker TS, Tomlin KL, Worthen GS, et al. (2005) Enhanced Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development mediated by human neutrophils. Infect Immun 73: 3693–3701. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.6.3693-3701.2005
    [132] Häussler S (2004) Biofilm formation by the small colony variant phenotype of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ Microbiol 6: 546–551. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00618.x
    [133] Drenkard E, Ausubel FM (2002) Pseudomonas biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance are linked to phenotypic variation. Nature 416: 740–743. doi: 10.1038/416740a
    [134] Häussler S, Ziegler I, Löttel A, et al. (2003) Highly adherent small-colony variants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis lung infection. J Med Microbiol 52: 295–301. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.05069-0
    [135] Goerke C, Wolz C (2010) Adaptation of Staphylococcus aureus to the cystic fibrosis lung. Int J Med Microbiol 300: 520–525. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.08.003
    [136] Kaplan JB, Izano EA, Gopal P, et al. (2012) Low levels of β-lactam antibiotics induce extracellular DNA release and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. MBio 3: e00198-12.
    [137] Savin C, Martin L, Bouchier C, et al. (2014) The Yersinia pseudotuberculosis complex: characterization and delineation of a new species, Yersinia wautersii. Int J Med Microbiol 304: 452–463. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.02.002
    [138] Reuter S, Connor TR, Barquist L, et al. (2014) Parallel independent evolution of pathogenicity within the genus Yersinia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: 6768–6773. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317161111
    [139] Chauhan N, Wrobel A, Skurnik M, et al. (2016) Yersinia adhesins: An arsenal for infection. Proteom Clin Appl 10: 949–963. doi: 10.1002/prca.201600012
    [140] Laird WJ, Cavanaugh DC (1980) Correlation of autoagglutination and virulence of yersiniae. J Clin Microbiol 11: 430–432.
    [141] Kapperud G, Lassen J (1983) Relationship of virulence-associated autoagglutination to hemagglutinin production in Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia enterocolitica-like bacteria. Infect Immun 42: 163–169.
    [142] Nagano T, Kiyohara T, Suzuki K, et al. (1997) Identification of pathogenic strains within serogroups of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and the presence of non-pathogenic strains isolated from animals and the environment. J Vet Med Sci 59: 153–158. doi: 10.1292/jvms.59.153
    [143] Falcão JP, Falcão DP, Pitondo-Silva A, et al. (2006) Molecular typing and virulence markers of Yersinia enterocolitica strains from human, animal and food origins isolated between 1968 and 2000 in Brazil. J Med Microbiol 55: 1539–1548. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46733-0
    [144] Fukushima H, Shimizu S, Inatsu Y (2011) Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis detection in foods. J Pathog.
    [145] Freund S, Czech B, Trülzsch K, et al. (2008) Unusual, virulence plasmid-dependent growth behavior of Yersinia enterocolitica in three-dimensional collagen gels. J Bacteriol 190: 4111–4120. doi: 10.1128/JB.00156-08
    [146] Grosskinsky U, Schütz M, Fritz M, et al. (2007) A conserved glycine residue of trimeric autotransporter domains plays a key role in Yersinia adhesin A autotransport. J Bacteriol 189: 9011–9019. doi: 10.1128/JB.00985-07
    [147] Schütz M, Weiss EM, Schindler M, et al. (2010) Trimer stability of YadA is critical for virulence of Yersinia enterocolitica. Infect Immun 78: 2677–2690. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01350-09
    [148] Kapperud G, Namork E, Skurnik M, et al. (1987) Plasmid-mediated surface fibrillae of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Yersinia enterocolitica: relationship to the outer membrane protein YOP1 and possible importance for pathogenesis. Infect Immun 55: 2247–2254.
    [149] Felek S, Muszyński A, Carlson RW, et al. (2009) Phosphoglucomutase of Yersinia pestis is required for autoaggregation and polymyxin B resistance. Infect Immun 78: 1163–1175.
    [150] Bujnakova D, Kmet V (2002) Aggregation of animal lactobacilli with O157 enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 49: 152–154. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0450.2002.00526.x
    [151] Reid G, McGroarty JA, Angotti R, et al. (1988) Lactobacillus inhibitor production against Escherichia coli and coaggregation ability with uropathogens. Can J Microbiol 34: 344–351. doi: 10.1139/m88-063
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Carlos Leonardo Araújo, Jorianne Alves, Alyne Lima, Larissa Dias, Patricia Silva, Joana Marques, Vasco Azevedo, Artur Silva, Adriana Folador, 2018, Chapter 4, 978-1-78984-614-0, 10.5772/intechopen.80445
    2. G. G. Kharseeva, S. Yu. Tyukavkina, A. Yu. Mironov, Diphtheria: characteristics of the pathogen and laboratory diagnostics (lecture), 2020, 65, 2412-1320, 699, 10.18821/0869-2084-2020-65-11-699-706
    3. I. V. Yeliseyeva, E. M. Babich, L. A. Zhdamarova, V. I. Belozersky, S. A. Kolpak, TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPLEX DIPHTERIА VACCINE WITH BACTERIAL ADJUVANT, 2019, 3, 2077-4214, 264, 10.29254/2077-4214-2019-3-152-264-268
    4. Rebecca A. Stern, Nagissa Mahmoudi, Caroline O. Buckee, Amina T. Schartup, Petros Koutrakis, Stephen T. Ferguson, Jack M. Wolfson, Steven C. Wofsy, Bruce C. Daube, Elsie M. Sunderland, The Microbiome of Size-Fractionated Airborne Particles from the Sahara Region, 2021, 55, 0013-936X, 1487, 10.1021/acs.est.0c06332
    5. Jens Möller, Anne Busch, Christian Berens, Helmut Hotzel, Andreas Burkovski, Newly Isolated Animal Pathogen Corynebacterium silvaticum Is Cytotoxic to Human Epithelial Cells, 2021, 22, 1422-0067, 3549, 10.3390/ijms22073549
    6. Elisabete Alves Cappelli, Andrezza do Espírito Santo Cucinelli, Liliane Simpson-Louredo, Maria Eurydice Freire Canellas, Camila Azevedo Antunes, Andreas Burkovski, Jemima Fuentes Ribeiro da Silva, Ana Luíza Mattos-Guaraldi, Alessandra Mattos Saliba, Louisy Sanches dos Santos, Insights of OxyR role in mechanisms of host–pathogen interaction of Corynebacterium diphtheriae, 2022, 53, 1517-8382, 583, 10.1007/s42770-022-00710-8
    7. Lisa Ott, Jens Möller, Andreas Burkovski, Interactions between the Re-Emerging Pathogen Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Host Cells, 2022, 23, 1422-0067, 3298, 10.3390/ijms23063298
    8. Lincoln de Oliveira Sant’Anna, Elisabete Alves Cappelli, Max Roberto Batista Araújo, Juliana Nunes Ramos, Liliane Simpson-Lourêdo, Andrezza do Espirito Santo Cucinelli, Paulo Victor Pereira Baio, Verônica Viana Vieira, Louisy Sanches dos Santos, Ana Luíza Mattos-Guaraldi, Virulence potential of the first Corynebacterium mycetoides strain isolated from human urine: a rare species of Corynebacterium, 2022, 24, 12864579, 105001, 10.1016/j.micinf.2022.105001
    9. Matthew E. Griffin, Steven Klupt, Juliel Espinosa, Howard C. Hang, Peptidoglycan NlpC/P60 peptidases in bacterial physiology and host interactions, 2022, 24519456, 10.1016/j.chembiol.2022.11.001
    10. Bao-Hong Lee, Wei-Hsuan Hsu, You-Zuo Chen, Kung-Ting Hsu, Tzu-Ming Pan, Limosilactobacillus fermentum SWP-AFFS02 Improves the Growth and Survival Rate of White Shrimp via Regulating Immunity and Intestinal Microbiota, 2021, 7, 2311-5637, 179, 10.3390/fermentation7030179
    11. Julian Ott, Mona M. Spilhaug, Simone Maschauer, Waqas Rafique, Jimmy E. Jakobsson, Karoline Hartvig, Harald Hübner, Peter Gmeiner, Olaf Prante, Patrick J. Riss, Pharmacological Characterization of Low-to-Moderate Affinity Opioid Receptor Agonists and Brain Imaging with18F-Labeled Derivatives in Rats, 2020, 63, 0022-2623, 9484, 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00683
    12. Latife Çakır Bayram, Seçil Abay, İzzet Burçin Satıcıoğlu, Tolga Güvenç, Görkem Ekebaş, Fuat Aydın, The ocular pyogranulomatous lesion in a Gentoo penguin (Pygoscelis papua) from the Antarctic Peninsula: evaluation of microbiological and histopathological analysis outcomes, 2021, 45, 0165-7380, 143, 10.1007/s11259-021-09796-1
    13. Simone Maschauer, Julian J. Ott, Günther Bernhardt, Torsten Kuwert, Max Keller, Olaf Prante, 18F-labelled triazolyl-linked argininamides targeting the neuropeptide Y Y1R for PET imaging of mammary carcinoma, 2019, 9, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-019-49399-0
    14. О. П. Корнійчук, О. Б. Надрага, О. І. Мотика, СУЧАСНИЙ ПОГЛЯД НА ВИДОВИЙ СПЕКТР ЗБУДНИКІВ «КЛАСИЧНИХ» ІНФЕКЦІЙНИХ БАКТЕРІЙНИХ ХВОРОБ, 2023, 2414-9969, 66, 10.11603/1681-2727.2023.1.13470
    15. Zhongyuan Li, Mengmeng Gu, Huanhuan Sun, Xiangliang Chen, Junshan Zhou, Yingdong Zhang, The Potential of Gut Microbiota in Prediction of Stroke-Associated Pneumonia, 2023, 13, 2076-3425, 1217, 10.3390/brainsci13081217
    16. Mélanie Hennart, Chiara Crestani, Sébastien Bridel, Nathalie Armatys, Sylvie Brémont, Annick Carmi-Leroy, Annie Landier, Virginie Passet, Laure Fonteneau, Sophie Vaux, Julie Toubiana, Edgar Badell, Sylvain Brisse, A global Corynebacterium diphtheriae genomic framework sheds light on current diphtheria reemergence , 2023, 3, 2804-3871, 10.24072/pcjournal.307
    17. Joshua T. Huffines, RaNashia L. Boone, Megan R. Kiedrowski, Sarah E. F. D'Orazio, Temperature influences commensal-pathogen dynamics in a nasal epithelial cell co-culture model, 2024, 2379-5042, 10.1128/msphere.00589-23
    18. Bao-Hong Lee, Yeh-Fang Hu, Yu-Ting Chu, Yu-Sheng Wu, Wei-Hsuan Hsu, Fan-Hua Nan, Lactic Acid Bacteria-Fermented Diet Containing Bacterial Extracellular Vesicles Inhibited Pathogenic Bacteria in Striped Beakfish (Oplegnathus fasciatus), 2024, 10, 2311-5637, 49, 10.3390/fermentation10010049
    19. Ramiro Ortiz Moyano, Stefania Dentice Maidana, Yoshiya Imamura, Mariano Elean, Fu Namai, Yoshihito Suda, Keita Nishiyama, Vyacheslav Melnikov, Haruki Kitazawa, Julio Villena, Antagonistic Effects of Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum 090104 on Respiratory Pathogens, 2024, 12, 2076-2607, 1295, 10.3390/microorganisms12071295
    20. A. A. Gallardo, V. Azevedo, R. Malena, M. Oppedisano, M. R. Leunda, F. A. Paolicchi, Cytopathic effects in MDBK cell lines after adhesion and internalization of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis biovar ovis, 2025, 1517-8382, 10.1007/s42770-025-01697-8
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2018 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(23183) PDF downloads(2185) Cited by(299)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog