Search Advanced

AIMS Agriculture and Food

2017, Volume 2, Issue 1: 16-39. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2017.1.16
Previous Article Next Article
Review

Understanding potato with the help of genomics

  • 1.
    Department of Plant Science, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
  • 2.
    Fredericton Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Fredericton, Canada
  • 3.
    International Potato Center, Lima, Peru
  • Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is an important staple crop with a highly heterozygous and complex genome. Despite its cultural and economic significance, potato improvement efforts have been held back by the relative lack of genetic resources available to producers and breeders. The publication of the potato reference genome and advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies have led to the development of a wide range of genomic and transcriptomic resources. An overview these new tools, from the updated versions of the potato reference genome and transcriptome, to more recent gene expression, regulatory motif, re-sequencing and SNP genotyping analyses, paints a picture of modern potato research and how it will change our understanding of potato as well as other tuber producing Solanaceae.

    Citation: José Héctor Gálvez, Helen H. Tai, Noelle A. Barkley, Kyle Gardner, David Ellis, Martina V. Strömvik. Understanding potato with the help of genomics[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2017, 2(1): 16-39. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2017.1.16

    Related Papers:

    [1] Yingying Xu, Songsong Dai, Haifeng Song, Lei Du, Ying Chen . Multi-modal brain MRI images enhancement based on framelet and local weights super-resolution. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 4258-4273. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023199
    [2] Hassan Ali Khan, Wu Jue, Muhammad Mushtaq, Muhammad Umer Mushtaq . Brain tumor classification in MRI image using convolutional neural network. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(5): 6203-6216. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020328
    [3] Yujie Kang, Wenjie Li, Jidong Lv, Ling Zou, Haifeng Shi, Wenjia Liu . Exploring brain dysfunction in IBD: A study of EEG-fMRI source imaging based on empirical mode diagram decomposition. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2025, 22(4): 962-987. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2025035
    [4] Yunyuan Gao, Zhen Cao, Jia Liu, Jianhai Zhang . A novel dynamic brain network in arousal for brain states and emotion analysis. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 7440-7463. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021368
    [5] Jian Xu, Qian Shao, Ruo Chen, Rongrong Xuan, Haibing Mei, Yutao Wang . A dual-path neural network fusing dual-sequence magnetic resonance image features for detection of placenta accrete spectrum (PAS) disorder. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(6): 5564-5575. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022260
    [6] R Nandhini Abiram, P M Durai Raj Vincent . Identity preserving multi-pose facial expression recognition using fine tuned VGG on the latent space vector of generative adversarial network. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(4): 3699-3717. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021186
    [7] Guanru Tan, Boyu Huang, Zhihan Cui, Haowen Dou, Shiqiang Zheng, Teng Zhou . A noise-immune reinforcement learning method for early diagnosis of neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(3): 2219-2239. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022104
    [8] Wei Yin, Tao Yang, GuangYu Wan, Xiong Zhou . Identification of image genetic biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease by orthogonal structured sparse canonical correlation analysis based on a diagnostic information fusion. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(9): 16648-16662. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023741
    [9] Zijian Wang, Yaqin Zhu, Haibo Shi, Yanting Zhang, Cairong Yan . A 3D multiscale view convolutional neural network with attention for mental disease diagnosis on MRI images. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(5): 6978-6994. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021347
    [10] M Nisha, T Kannan, K Sivasankari . A semi-supervised deep neuro-fuzzy iterative learning system for automatic segmentation of hippocampus brain MRI. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(12): 7830-7853. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024344
  • Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is an important staple crop with a highly heterozygous and complex genome. Despite its cultural and economic significance, potato improvement efforts have been held back by the relative lack of genetic resources available to producers and breeders. The publication of the potato reference genome and advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies have led to the development of a wide range of genomic and transcriptomic resources. An overview these new tools, from the updated versions of the potato reference genome and transcriptome, to more recent gene expression, regulatory motif, re-sequencing and SNP genotyping analyses, paints a picture of modern potato research and how it will change our understanding of potato as well as other tuber producing Solanaceae.


    Abbreviations: DHW: Domestic Hot Water; EED: Energy Efficiency Directive; EPBD: Energy Performance of Buildings Directive; EU: European Union; GHG: Greenhouse Gases; HVAC: Heating, Ventilation, and Air-Conditioning; LED: Light Emitting Diode; MS: Member States; nZE: nearly Zero Energy; nZEB: nearly Zero Energy Buildings; neZEH: nearly Zero Energy Hotels; PV: Photovoltaic; RES: Renewable Energy Sources; ROI: Return on Investment; UNWTO: World Tourism Organisation

    1. Introduction

    The existing building stock represents a high potential for energy savings [1,2]. Currently, there are a few successful demonstrations of nearly Zero Energy Buildings (nZEBs) in Europe to motivate and initiate replications in the private sector. Hotels in specific, represent a big challenge, since they are usually complex building systems and at the same time, energy intensive businesses [3,4]. The hotel industry is highly depended on energy, which in some luxury hotels is up to 50% of the total Operation and Maintenance cost [5], therefore their challenge is to minimize energy costs without compromising the quality of their guests' stay [6].

    Indeed, the hotel industry is the most energy and resource-intensive branch of the accommodation sector. They are "comfort or service-oriented accommodations" [7] with great heterogeneity in terms of business sizes and other individual features. Major studies investigating energy efficiency in the tourism sector pointed out the high potential of energy savings as well as the lack of a systematic approach for investigating its energy use [8]. The credibility and applicability of results shown in many types of research aiming at improving the understanding of the hotel energy flows [9,10,11] are always strongly depended on a wide variety of variables. However, based on different studies [12], the idea of a "typical" hotel remains vague and is required to be linked to a bottom-up approach including hosting and non-hosting activities, as will be explained below.

    Although several examples of energy saving in non-domestic buildings exist today [13,14], hotels face difficulties when undertaking energy efficiency actions, mainly due to the existing energy policies, as well as due to being unfamiliar with energy technologies [15].

    Since hotels place great significance on the comfort of their guests, they can apply a variety of mechanical and passive cooling means, such as natural cooling, ventilation, shading, thermal insulation etc. [16], providing a range of options so that architects and developers select the most sustainable strategy. It is clear that the implementation of renewable applications in the hotel/tourism sectors is case sensitive and follows different routes depending on existing needs and climate changes [17].

    Studies suggest to integrate energy in the complete environmental performance of the hotels as a part of their excellence and eco-friendly policy [18]. The significant demand for Domestic Hot Water (DHW), not only for sanitary uses but also for swimming pools or spa facilities, can be covered by Renewable Energy Sources (RES), mostly with solar thermal systems [19,20].

    This paper summarizes the approach and methodology of the "nearly Zero Energy Hotels" (neZEH) initiative, which is a response to the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) recast, 2010/31/EU [21], supporting the EU Member States (MS) in their national plans for increasing the number of nZEBs [22]. The paper aims to: (ⅰ) describe briefly the methodology for developing neZEH pilot projects; (ⅱ) present the results of energy audits in hotels located in six south European countries (Greece, Croatia, France, Romania, Italy and Spain) plus one north (Sweden) for comparison; (ⅲ) to assess how realistic is the nearly Zero Energy (nZE) vision in the hotel sector.

    2. Legislative framework

    2.1. European policy

    In the EPBD recast (article 2) an nZEB is defined as "a building that has a very high energy performance; the nearly zero or very low amount of energy required should be covered to a very significant extent by energy from renewable sources, including energy from renewable sources produced on-site or nearby". According to the EPBD recast, by 31 December 2020 all new private buildings and after 31 December 2018, all new public buildings should be nZEBs. Even though the EPBD recast provides the framework for nZEBs, the MS should implement it in such a way to reflect their national, regional or local conditions [23].

    Furthermore, article 4 of the Energy Efficiency Directive (EED) [24] stipulates that MS shall establish a long-term strategy to trigger investments in the renovation of their existing building stock, both residential and commercial, public or private.

    Various reports in the past [25,26,27] have analyzed the status of nZEB transposition in national legislations. According to most recent data, the status of nZEB definition in the EU countries is as follows: 18 countries have set an official definition, in one country the definition is under approval, whereas in nine countries the definition is under development.

    In 13 MS, the definition includes also the proportion of RES production. Although most MS reported a wide variety of policy measures, including financial incentives, strengthening their building regulations, communication activities and demonstrations, not in all cases is well-defined whether these measures specifically target nZEBs. Based on data from Concerted Action EPBD, the numerical definitions do not cover all building typologies in all countries; moreover, they are remarkably different in content, calculation assumptions and ambition level.

    2.2. Transposition of EPBD in the selected EU countries

    Within the context of the neZEH project, the national framework has been analyzed for the seven studied EU countries [6]. Most of these countries have officially introduced numerical definitions for some categories of new and refurbished buildings (Table 1).

    Table 1. nZEB numerical definitions for new and refurbished buildings in the neZEH countries (status February 2016).
    Country New buildings Refurbished buildings
    Status of definition Maximum primary energy (kWh/m2/y) Share of RES Status of definition Maximum primary energy (kWh/m2/y)
    Residential Non-residential Residential Non-residential
    Croatia ✔ 35–80 25–250 ✔ 30% The same as for new buildings
    France ✔ 40–65 [a, b] 70–110 ✔ Quantitative [c] ✔ 80 [a, b] 60% PE [d]
    Greece Under development - - Minimum share in current requirements for all buildings Under development - -
    Italy ✔ Class A1 50% RES for DHW + 50% RES for (DHW + heating + cooling) ✔ As for new buildings
    Romania ✔ 93–217 [a, b] 50–192 [a, b] ✔ Quantitative ✔ 120–230 [a, b] 120–400 [a, b]
    Spain Under development Buildings will need to comply with class A Minimum share in current requirements for all buildings Under development - - -
    Sweden Under development 30–75 [a, b] 30–105 [a, b] All energy from RES will be excluded from the consumption values ND* - -
    *ND = no data; [a] Depending on the reference building; [b] Depending on the location; [c] Requirement depending on the RES measures adopted; [d] Maximum primary energy consumption defined as a percentage of primary energy consumption (PE) of a reference building.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Estonia has been the first MS, which defined numerical targets for the hotel type of buildings (130 kWh/m2/y of primary energy, 27% RES), including heating and cooling, ventilation, DHW, lighting and auxiliary electricity, as well as the use of appliances [28].

    3. Methodology

    The objective of the European initiative Nearly Zero Energy Hotels [6], involving partners from the tourism and energy efficiency sectors, academia and research and organisations with worldwide impact, like the World Tourism Organisation (UNWTO), was to accelerate the rate of refurbishments of existing hotels into nZEBs. The methodology to achieve this objective consisted of: providing technical assistance to existing pilot hotels for refurbishing into nZEBs, demonstrating the sustainability of investments towards zero energy and undertaking training and capacity building activities at regional, national and EU level (Figure 1).

    Figure 1. The neZEH benchmarking methodology.
    DownLoad: Full-Size ImgPowerPoint

    3.1. Benchmarking methodology

    Due to the delay of national transposition of the nZEB definition and given the absence of numerical indicators for hotel buildings in the neZEH countries, there was a necessity to introduce certain benchmarks for primary energy use and RES share. The benchmarks were used as targets for the pilot projects, in the cases where the official definition was not in place.

    The benchmarking took into account that hotels cannot be considered as typical non-residential buildings; their business model includes numerous energy-intensive operations related to their customers' comfort and expectations, therefore, closely linked to their competitiveness and viability [29]. Data from Spanish hotels estimate that energy use related to the non-hosting function of the hotel i.e., hotel zones where conditions other than the standard indoor environmental conditions may be required, such as swimming pool, kitchen, spa, etc., can reach to an average 35% of the total energy use [30]. Initially, the research team focused on identifying benchmarks for nZE hotels, taking into account only the typical use of the building, as defined in the EPBD.

    According to EPBD recast, the typical use (heating, ventilation, cooling, lighting, DHW) must refer to the standard indoor environmental conditions, which in the case of hotels are the comfort conditions for their guests and staff, as recommended in EN15251:2007 Standard ("Indoor environmental input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment, lighting and acoustics"). With these principles, the standard zones of a hotel to be considered among the hosting functions are guests' rooms, reception hall, offices, meeting rooms, bar and restaurant.

    The additional energy uses of non-hosting functions, such as spas, swimming pools, saunas, gym, kitchens, laundry, etc., can be considered in the future in a "modular" benchmarking based on the results of the pilot projects.

    The initial step in the benchmarks calculation was the definition of the climate zones; in this work, five European climate zones were assumed as defined by the Ecofys [31]. Each region within a country was assigned to one of these climate zones.

    A reference country with existing nZEB numerical definition or relevant minimum energy performance values was chosen as representative for each of the five European climate zones, in order to have reference numerical values for each zone. The first step calculation included the energy uses of heating, cooling, DHW, HVAC auxiliaries and lighting. Since not all reference values corresponded to the same energy uses, adjustments were made to include energy uses that were missing from some reference values, so as to obtain comparable values for the five climatic zones. The primary energy indicators calculated for the five climatic zones were then increased with extra delivered energy for appliances according to Estonian regulation—which at the time, as mentioned before, was the only country that introduced nZEB numerical definition for hotels—converted into primary energy using the national primary energy factors for electricity. The results were primary energy indicators (benchmarks) for new hotels—all energy end uses included—for the seven neZEH countries, as shown in Table 2 [6]. In order to introduce benchmarks for refurbished hotels, a correction factor of 30% was applied, based on review of existing national nZEB definitions and minimum requirements in building codes with different values for new built and renovated buildings.

    Table 2. Country-specific neZEH benchmarks.
    Country Primary energy indicator for new hotels (kWh/m2/y)a Primary energy indicator for refurbished hotels (kWh/m2/y)a
    Croatia 77 100
    France 115 150
    Greece 76 122
    Italy 71 93
    Romania 80 104
    Spain 72 94
    Sweden 134 175
    aincluding hosting functions + appliances.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Primary energy indicators for existing hotels (2008 level) were also calculated to provide an insight into the energy reduction needed to be achieved to reach benchmarks for new hotels. Energy use data for existing building stock from EU level sources [32,33,34] were processed, showing that data from residential buildings are more proper to describe the hosting function of hotels than the non-residential building data. The existing residential buildings data by energy source [32] were used in combination with national primary energy parameters in order to calculate primary energy values. Adjustments for additional cooling and ventilation needs were made taking into account EN15251:2007 standard, resulting in primary energy indicators for the hosting function of hotels in each country (2008 level). The comparison of these indicators with benchmarks for new hotels showed that an average 75% energy reduction has to be achieved, a value which is in compliance with previous results [33].

    3.2. The pilot projects

    In order to demonstrate the feasibility of refurbishment interventions leading to nZEB status, neZEH supported pilot projects in the seven target countries, which were selected following a three-step process (Figure 2):

    Figure 2. Pilot hotels selection procedure.
    DownLoad: Full-Size ImgPowerPoint

    (a) Public calls per country; this initial step resulted in a pool of 85 applications.

    (b) Evaluation of the candidate applications and selection of 35 hotels (five candidates per country) by applying criteria, including the hotel's commitment and maturity to achieve nZE status, the distribution of selected hotels amongst the different climate zones and the alternative typologies.

    (c) Energy pre-audits: the selected hotels were pre-audited in order to assess, in an initial phase, their capability and potential to reach the nZE targets. More accurate energy and economic data helped in filtering and ranking the hotels to lead to the selection of at least two pilot hotels per country.

    3.2.1. Climate zones

    As mentioned previously in Section 3.1, five European climatic zones were taken into account in the benchmark calculations. These climatic zones were also used as a reference throughout the implementation of the action, meaning that outcomes should be representative per each zone, to make sure that there are replicable examples for all the regions of Europe.

    3.2.2. Hotel typologies

    Four hotel typologies were identified: (ⅰ) Coastal; (ⅱ) Mountain; (ⅲ) Urban; (ⅳ) Rural. Each participating country had pre-identified the hotel typologies within its region, so as the five candidates during the pre-audit phase would correspond to these typologies.

    3.3. Energy audits and feasibility study

    An energy audit was implemented in each pilot hotel, which included a full on-site inspection and examination of energy uses, suggesting the most appropriate solutions to reach nZE levels. In more detail the audit included:

    • Data gathering and compilation (drawings, energy statistics, utility bills, etc.).

    • On-site inspection (study of HVAC infrastructure, lighting status, windows and insulation standards, etc.).

    • Calculation of the current energy flows (inputs and losses).

    • Recommendations for proper measures ranked based on savings and future costs.

    • A proposed action plan.

    Following the energy audit, a detailed energy study, as well as a feasibility study were carried out, which included the most suitable technological solutions combined with a cost scenario and the calculation of the Return on Investment (ROI), to assist in the decision making. The following parameters were taken into account when proposing technological solutions:

    • The specific characteristics of each hotel (site and orientation, energy consumption, seasonality, etc.).

    • The improvement of the thermal comfort conditions for hotel guests, as well as other critical quality parameters for hotels, such as noise levels and overall convenience of guests.

    • The cost of each solution based on real market data of each country.

    • The funding opportunities, tax reliefs or credit facilities available.

    • The payback period of each solution.

    The hotels received advice on available funding opportunities and assistance in the tender preparation and selection of contractors for implementing the energy efficiency and RES measures. Furthermore, training was provided to the hotel owners and staff, guiding them on how to maximize their efficiency and optimize the use of the implemented solutions; training material and guides are available to other hoteliers for upscale [6]. Finally, the hotels received marketing guidelines [6] to support them in their effort to communicate their nZE profile to potential guests. The pilot hotels will continue to receive expanded visibility at national and EU level, inspiring more hoteliers to proceed in similar refurbishments and triggering more investments in nZE projects.

    4. Results and discussion

    The results from seven European countries are presented in this paper. The pilot hotels have been audited, gathering a set of technical and qualitative data for each. Per case, the group of experts analysed each function (hosting and non-hosting). The primary energy use was calculated from building plant characteristics and occupation schedules in relation to real consumption from bills in order to validate them. Although the energy demand for non-hosting functions (pools, bars, restaurants, conference room, spa, etc.) varies from country to country, hotel type, operation months and occupancy, in some hotels it reaches to more than three times the energy demand of the hosting functions (Table 3).

    Table 3. Primary energy use and RES share before refurbishment for (a) hosting functions and (b) non-hosting functions for the 16 pilot hotels, as resulted from the energy audits.
    Hotel Country Hotel typology Operating months % Average occupancy during opening months Facilities Primary energy use (kWh/m 2/y) RES share (%)
    Hosting Non-hosting Hosting Non-hosting
    1 Croatia Coastal May–Oct 35 spa/wellness 130 16 36 N/A
    2 Croatia Coastal all year 48 spa, sauna, pool, gym 66 60 64 N/A
    3 France Coastal all year 83 lounge bar, pool, spa 244 N/A 0 N/A
    4 France Rural Apr–Oct 44 lounge bar, pool, spa 490 N/A 8 N/A
    5 Greece Urban May–Oct 84 kitchen, restaurant, pools 230 450 30 0
    6 Greece Coastal Apr–Oct 78 pools, bars, restaurants, conference room 250 293 26 20
    7 Greece Urban all year 80 Bar 287 0 20 0
    8 Italy Mountain Jun–Sep 21 Spa/wellness 100 66 74 0
    9 Italy Urban all year 76 kitchen, gym 266 24 0 0
    10 Romania Urban all year 70 restaurant, conference room 347 1,451 0 0
    11 Romania Urban all year 59 restaurant, conference room 227 588 4 0
    12 Romania Mountain all year 20 spa, pool, adventure park, conference rooms, restaurant, disco, tennis 277 1,460 0 0
    13 Spain Rural all year 22 spa, pool, shrine room 278 253 9 0
    14 Spain Coastal all year 80 spa, restaurant, gym, sauna 363 2,273 9 0
    15 Sweden Urban all year 56 kitchen, restaurant, sauna 722 1,482 0 0
    16 Sweden Urban all year 35 kitchen, restaurant, sauna, gym 151 1,285 0 0
    Averages 277 727 18 2
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Generally, in most cases, as can be concluded from the pilot project results:

    • the full-year operating hotels are bigger energy consumers than the seasonal ones, when comparing within the same country.

    • the rural/mountain ones have higher primary energy use than the coastal and the urban ones.

    • the non-hosting activities very often impose an important burden on the energy performance of hotels.

    • the use of RES is limited in most cases, which might not be expected at first.

    Energy saving and RES measures were proposed per case, focusing on the energy uses with the highest energy consumption and the most inefficient parts and equipment of each hotel. The set of measures proposed for each hotel should satisfy the target of neZEH benchmarks, in terms of the eventual primary energy use for the hosting functions and the eventual RES share, always in conjunction with economic feasibility. The thermal comfort for guests and the overall improvement of indoor environmental conditions, on the basis of international and national standards (usually around 20 ℃ for winter and 26 ℃ for summer), was also an important parameter. In addition, guest convenience was taken into account, especially in the case of automatic controls, as well as the maintenance of quality and services standards.

    The data gathered from the energy audits were used to optimize the simulation models for the calculations of the energy savings and renewable energy production of the proposed measures. The primary energy reduction percentage and RES share were calculated both for hosting and non-hosting functions, in order to demonstrate the energy efficiency potential of the different services of hotels. Results for the total of 16 hotels are presented in Table 4.

    Table 4. Energy savings and RES share in hosting and non-hosting functions in the audited hotels.
    Average primary energy use after suggested interventions (kWh/m2/y) Average reduction percentage (%) Average RES share after (%)
    Hosting functions 102 63 46
    Non-hosting functions 374 49 11
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The overwhelming majority of pilot hotels are able to achieve savings higher than 50% of their initial consumption. That is a substantial saving percentage, taking into account that most of these hotels have been already quite energy efficient. When it came to RES share, the majority of them experienced a coverage increase of at least 20%, while some others have demonstrated up to a remarkable 60%. On average, by applying the measures proposed in the energy audits, the RES share increased from an average of 18% to an average of 46% in the hosting functions.

    Primary energy use for the hosting functions across all sixteen pilot hotels can decrease dramatically—from an average of 277 kWh/m2/y to an average of 102 kWh/m2/y; a reduction of 63%. At the same time, RES share for the hosting functions can be increased by an average of 18% to an average of 46%.

    The non-hosting functions are, on average, much more energy intensive, therefore, extremely important for the overall performance of the hotel energy efficiency towards the nZEB concept. The primary energy use for the non-hosting functions can decrease from an average of 727 kWh/m2/y to an average of 374 kWh/m2/y, a reduction of 49%.

    Amongst the measures which will improve (directly or indirectly) the energy consumption, simple interventions, offering the most attractive payback (i.e., lighting controls, sun-shading devices, shower head diffusers, etc.), are also included. In contrary, building envelope insulation, although being the first priority in terms of energy efficiency and thermal comfort of guests, remains very often less attractive, with up to 25 years payback period (Table 5).

    Table 5. Measures suggested after energy audits.
    Measure Energy savings (%) Investment (€) Payback period (yrs)
    Building envelope insulation 3–35 30,000–350,000 6.4–25
    Installation of solar thermal collectors 5–39 5,600–143,000 10–14
    Installation of photovoltaic (PV) panels 4–23 8,000–300,000 4.5–20
    Installation of Building Energy Management System 2.6–18.5 12,000–125,000 6.8–21
    Replacement of light bulbs with LED 2–14 1,200–32,000 1–9
    Lighting controls 1–7 1,300–4,000 0.4–2
    Replacement of low efficiency with high efficiency heat pumps 1–36 30,000–300,000 5.4–11.8
    Adding ceiling fans and use of control systems for cooling 17 95,000 9.5
    Installation of radiant heaters 1 7,000 12
    Installation of geothermal heating system 10–58 50,000–500,000 6–16
    Installation of sun-shading devices 2–6 8,000–20,000 3
    Connection to district heating 1–26 14,000–89,000 5–9
    Outdoor redesign for better microclimate 4 25,000 4
    Heat recovery in ventilation 5.7–8 20,000–86,000 8–16
    Install water saving taps and shower head diffusers 4.9–7.5 350–1,600 0.16–0.3
    Balance the DHW network 1 4,000 7
    Replacement of the minibars 2.1 32,250 10.7
    Balancing and improvements of heating system 1–21 800–38,000 1–5.7
    Reduce stand-by consumption 1 400 1.4
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    5. Energy efficiency in hotels e-toolkit

    Based on the overall experience gained from the neZEH initiative and its pilot projects, a practical e-toolkit was developed to help hotel owners benchmark their energy consumption compared to the neZEH levels and to suggest appropriate measures for energy efficiency improvement and RES integration. It is designed to increase the energy efficiency capacity in the accommodation industry and to encourage hotel owners to proceed with energy renovation projects towards nZE targets. The neZEH e-toolkit [35] is based on the UNWTO Hotel Energy Solutions toolkit (also co-funded by the Intelligent Energy Programme), which—since 2011—has engaged 20,000 users worldwide and 1,500 hotels in Europe in better understanding how to become energy efficient and more competitive (Figure 3).

    Figure 3. HES e-toolkit methodology diagram [36].
    DownLoad: Full-Size ImgPowerPoint

    The neZEH e-toolkit uses a ranking methodology at the national level, to rank the identified solutions according to three aspects: potential energy savings, size of the financial investment and profitability of the financial investment, as per the flux diagram shown in Figure 4.

    Figure 4. Flux diagram of the technologies/solutions ranking tool.
    DownLoad: Full-Size ImgPowerPoint

    The toolkit is online since 2016 and the target users are the hotel owners or hotel technical staff. It is a user-friendly tool, which requires answers to a short questionnaire and subsequently provides hoteliers with a report assessing their current energy profile, indicating how close the hotel is to from achieving the nearly zero energy levels and providing an indicative set of appropriate renewable energy and energy efficiency measures.

    6. Annex: Case study hotel

    The case study of Hotel No. 6, as appears in Table 3, is presented in more detail in this Annex. The hotel actual status is calculated with the use of energy bills from all the different energy types, on-site visits and measurement of lamps, equipment, heating, cooling and hot water systems, interviews and cooperation with the hotel management and maintenance departments. The energy audit included building information and measurements, occupancy data from the hotel, description of all mechanical and equipment installations, RES, water and energy use of every building of the hotel. Table 6 shows the general data from the hotel located in a coastal location in the island of Crete. The hotel according to all the information gathered had a primary energy consumption of 250 kWh/m2/y for the hosting functions and primary energy consumption of 293 kWh/m2/y for the non-hosting functions.

    Table 6. General data for the hotel case study, as derived from the energy audit performed.
    Hotel typology Coastal, Resort & Spa hotel
    Category 5 stars
    Location Lasithi, Crete
    Working season April–October
    Number of beds 1,036
    Mean occupancy 78%
    Total hotel area (m2) 20,866
    Thermal zones area (m2) 18,017
    Non-thermal zones area (m2) 2,849
    Annual primary energy consumption (MWh) 4,624
    Electricity energy consumption (kWh) 1,311,430
    Biomass energy consumption (kWh) 428,400
    Oil energy consumption (kWh) 98,472
    LPG energy consumption (kWh) 270,794
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    All the information is used for correlations between the occupancy and energy use for different functions of the hotel and also for constructing a simulation model of the hotel. The simulation model is validated from the selected data and is used for the selection and implementation of the proposed energy measures. All the necessary climatic data and thermal comfort boundaries are used for setting points according to the different countries. For this particular example, the simulation model included climatic data from the government database for the location in Lasithi, Crete and the thermal comfort boundaries were set at 20 ℃ for winter and 26 ℃ for summer as proposed in the Greek legislation for energy consumption in buildings. The proposed measures as presented in Table 7 are derived from the hotel necessities and installations with large energy demand, like the cooling loads, which reach to a striking 62% as can be seen in Figure 5. The measures resulted in the primary energy use for the hosting functions to drop to 99 kWh/m2/y (60% energy saving) and RES share to increase to 60%, thus reaching the neZEH benchmarks set for Greece and achieving in this way nZEB status. At the same time, the measures proposed helped the hotel reduce primary energy use for non-hosting functions to 110 kWh/m2/y (62% energy saving) and RES share to rise to 50%.

    Table 7. Results of the proposed energy saving and RES measures for the hotel case study.
    Enhancement Yearly primary energy savings per m2 (kWh/m2/y) Total yearly primary energy savings (kWh/y) Avoided emissions (kg CO2/y) Simple investment payback (y)
    Adding heat pumps for cooling and DHW 92 1,667,060 456,118 5.4
    Installing PV modules 34 609,000 207,690 6.0
    Adding insulation and double glazed windows in the central building 21 371,161 126,578 19.2
    Adding solar collectors for DHW and coverage of the spa pool 13 231,184 11,805 10.0
    Adding green for better microclimate conditions 11 198,193 67,590 4.1
    Total 171 3,076,598 869,781 9.4
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 5. Energy balance for the hotel case study.
    DownLoad: Full-Size ImgPowerPoint

    The project rollout plan assumed a step by step approach, where the priority measures or more economically attractive measures are installed first. The insulation, which is more expensive and has a longer payback time, was set to be installed from 2020 onwards. Despite the long payback, it was decided to eventually adopt this solution as it will greatly contribute to the improvement of thermal comfort for hotel guests and have a positive impact on the hotel standards.

    7. Conclusions

    It is a known fact that buildings consume 40% of total energy and emit 36% of Greenhouse Gases (GHG) in the EU [37], so the existing building stock represents a high potential for energy savings. Accommodation in specific, counting for 21% of total tourism sector GHG emissions [38], represents a bigger challenge, since hotels are more complex building systems and energy intensive businesses.

    This work proposes a step by step approach, starting from an energy audit and resulting in a renovation rollout plan and a marketing plan, and provides useful insights regarding the nZEB benchmarks for hotel buildings, in terms of energy indicators. A complete methodology was developed and applied in the hotel sector to support the implementation of a large-scale renovation towards nZE status. The analysis showed that:

    (ⅰ) The vision of nZE in hotels is close to the reality; economically attractive interventions towards nZE are feasible in existing hotels.

    (ⅱ) In most of the cases, the achievement of nZE targets is possible to be implemented in two or more phases.

    (ⅲ) The non-hosting functions are more critical than the hosting ones, when targeting for high energy efficiency in hotels; this is due to the fact that hotels are not typical buildings, but resemble small communities.

    (ⅳ) In most of the cases, the high-tech solutions are not always the best value for money option; low-cost interventions in selected cases could be very economically efficient.

    (ⅴ) The hotel industry is very cooperative to become more competitive, but in parallel eco-friendly. Hoteliers acknowledge that they have a lot to gain by implementing energy efficiency measures, including the reduction of operational and maintenance cost, energy security on peak demands, an increase of competitiveness and improved image.

    (ⅵ) A key element of the initiative's success is the commitment of the tourism stakeholders to endorse the neZEH concept in hotels, challenging, even more hotels to invest in renovation projects that achieve nΖΕ levels.

    In the long-term, the neZEH project plans to support the hospitality sector to reduce operational costs and to enhance competitiveness and sustainability, contributing in parallel to the EU efforts to reach the 2020 and 2030 targets. It is estimated that the investments triggered by 2020 will be 80 M€ and will have as a result: cumulative primary energy savings to reach 42,000 toe/y, RES production of 11,000 toe/y and up to 98,000 t CO2eq/y reduction of GHG emissions.

    The 16 pilot projects in Greece, Croatia, France, Italy, Romania, Spain and Sweden, will stand out as "real life" lighthouse examples in Europe and globally and inspire other hotel owners to invest in high energy performance refurbishments, including a large share of their energy needs covered by on-site or nearby RES, as requested by the EPBD recast and EED European Directives.

    In line with other published reports and papers, this work would like to highlight the significance of capabilities building actions as a crucial part of the policy packages promoting nZEBs, maybe by a potential shift from subsidizing applications [39].

    Additionally, the authors suggest future work should consider a "modular" benchmarking, with a specific focus on non-hosting functions, in order to provide recommendations for policy makers for dealing with hotel buildings' complexities. The parameters which affected the results, identified in this work, were the hotel typology, climate zone, offered facilities, operation seasonality. The data results obtained and presented in this paper can be used in a future study to define modular benchmarks for hotels, on the basis of the different parameters that define how much and how energy is being used in European hotels.

    Acknowledgments

    This work was supported by the European Commission under the Intelligent Energy Europe Programme, within the framework of the project neZEH (Nearly Energy Zero Hotels, www.nezeh.eu) [grant number IEE/12/829/SI2.644758, 01/04/2013 to 31/03/2016]. The sole responsibility for the content of this paper lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.

    The authors would like to thank the following persons for their active involvement in the project neZEH: Rodrigo Morell and Ignacio G. Hernandez (Creara Consultores S.L., Madrid, Spain), Zoritsa Urosevic (World Tourism Organization, Madrid, Spain), Cristina Nunez (Network of European Regions for Competitive and Sustainable Tourism, Brussels, Belgium), Anita Derjanecz (Federation of European Heating, Ventilation and Air-conditioning Associations, Brussels, Belgium), Camelia Rata (Agency of Braşov for Energy Management and Environment Protection, Braşov, Romania), Marko Bišćan (Energy Institute Hrvoje Požar, Zagreb, Croatia), Stephane Pouffary (ENERGIES 2050, Villeneuve-Loubet, France), Sara L. Sacerdotti (Sistemi Territoriali per l'Innovazione, Torino, Italy), Nigel Claridge (Sustainable Innovation, Stockholm, Sweden).

    Conflict of interest

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.

    [1] Food and Agriculture Organization. Food and Agricultural commodities production / Commodities by regions. FAOSTAT, 2016. Available from: http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/rankings/commodities_by_regions/E
    [2] Hawkes JG (1990) The potato: evolution, biodiversity and genetic resources. Belhaven Press.
    [3] Machida-Hirano R (2015) Diversity of potato genetic resources. Breed Sci 65: 26-40. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.65.26
    [4] Ovchinnikova A, Krylova E, Gavrilenko T, et al. (2011) Taxonomy of cultivated potatoes (Solanum section Petota: Solanaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 165: 107-155. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2010.01107.x
    [5] Huamán Z, Spooner DM (2002) Reclassification of landrace populations of cultivated potatoes (Solanum sect. Petota). Am J Bot 89: 947-965. doi: 10.3732/ajb.89.6.947
    [6] Gebhardt C, Ballvora A, Walkemeier B, et al. (2004) Assessing genetic potential in germplasm collections of crop plants by marker-trait association: a case study for potatoes with quantitative variation of resistance to late blight and maturity type. Mol Breed 13: 93-102. doi: 10.1023/B:MOLB.0000012878.89855.df
    [7] Simko I, Haynes KG, Jones RW (2006) Assessment of linkage disequilibrium in potato genome with single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Genetics 173: 2237-2245. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.060905
    [8] Douches DS, Jastrzebski K, Maas D, et al. (1996) Assessment of potato breeding over the past century. Crop Sci 36: 1544-1552. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600060024x
    [9] Iovene M, Zhang T, Lou Q, et al. (2013) Copy number variation in potato - An asexually propagated autotetraploid species. Plant J 75: 80-89. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12200
    [10] Hirsch CN, Hirsch CD, Felcher K, et al. (2013) Retrospective view of North American potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) breeding in the 20th and 21st centuries. G3 3: 1003-1013.
    [11] Massa AN, Childs KL, Lin H, et al. (2011) The Transcriptome of the Reference Potato Genome Solanum tuberosum Group Phureja Clone DM1-3 516R44. PLoS One 6: 1-8.
    [12] The Potato Genome Sequencing Consortium (2011) Genome sequence and analysis of the tuber crop potato. Nature 475: 189-195. doi: 10.1038/nature10158
    [13] Sharma SK, Bolser D, de Boer J, et al. (2013) Construction of reference chromosome-scale pseudomolecules for potato: integrating the potato genome with genetic and physical maps. G3 3: 2031-2047. doi: 10.1534/g3.113.007153
    [14] Aversano R, Contaldi F, Ercolano MR, et al. (2015) The Solanum commersonii Genome Sequence Provides Insights into Adaptation to Stress Conditions and Genome Evolution of Wild Potato Relatives. Plant Cell 27: 954-968. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.135954
    [15] The Tomato Genome Consortium (2012) The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485: 635-641. doi: 10.1038/nature11119
    [16] Kim S, Park M, Yeom S-I, et al. (2014) Genome sequence of the hot pepper provides insights into the evolution of pungency in Capsicum species. Nat Genet 46: 270-278. doi: 10.1038/ng.2877
    [17] Sierro N, Battey JND, Ouadi S, et al. (2014) The tobacco genome sequence and its comparison with those of tomato and potato. Nat Commun 5: 3833.
    [18] Bombarely A, Moser M, Amrad A, et al. (2016) Insight into the evolution of the Solanaceae from the parental genomes of Petunia hybrida. Nat Plants 2: 16074. doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.74
    [19] Hardigan MA, Crisovan E, Hamilton JP, et al. (2016) Genome reduction uncovers a large dispensable genome and adaptive role for copy number variation in asexually propagated Solanum tuberosum. Plant Cell 28: 388-405. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00538
    [20] Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, et al. (2012) SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 1: 18. doi: 10.1186/2047-217X-1-18
    [21] Crookshanks M, Emmersen J, Welinder KG, et al. (2001) The potato tuber transcriptome: analysis of 6077 expressed sequence tags. FEBS Lett 506: 123-126. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02888-5
    [22] Ronning CM, Stegalkina SS, Ascenzi RA, et al. (2003) Comparative analyses of potato expressed sequence tag libraries. Plant Physiol 131: 419-429. doi: 10.1104/pp.013581
    [23] Flinn B, Rothwell C, Griffiths R, et al. (2005) Potato expressed sequence tag generation and analysis using standard and unique cDNA libraries. Plant Mol Biol 59: 407-433. doi: 10.1007/s11103-005-0185-y
    [24] Rensink W, Hart A, Liu J, et al. (2005) Analyzing the potato abiotic stress transcriptome using expressed sequence tags. Genome 48: 598-605. doi: 10.1139/g05-034
    [25] Rensink WA, Lee Y, Liu J, et al. (2005) Comparative analyses of six solanaceous transcriptomes reveal a high degree of sequence conservation and species-specific transcripts. BMC Genomics 6: 124. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-6-124
    [26] Kloosterman B, Vorst O, Hall RD, et al. (2005) Tuber on a chip: Differential gene expression during potato tuber development. Plant Biotechnol J 3: 505-519. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2005.00141.x
    [27] Rensink WA, Iobst S, Hart A, et al. (2005) Gene expression profiling of potato responses to cold, heat, and salt stress. Funct Integr Genomics 5: 201-207. doi: 10.1007/s10142-005-0141-6
    [28] Kloosterman B, De Koeyer D, Griffiths R, et al. (2008) Genes driving potato tuber initiation and growth: Identification based on transcriptional changes using the POCI array. Funct Integr Genomics 8: 329-340. doi: 10.1007/s10142-008-0083-x
    [29] Bengtsson T, Weighill D, Proux-Wéra E, et al. (2014) Proteomics and transcriptomics of the BABA-induced resistance response in potato using a novel functional annotation approach. BMC Genomics 15: 315. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-315
    [30] Bachem C, Van Der Hoeven R, Lucker J, et al. (2000) Functional genomic analysis of potato tuber life-cycle. Potato Res 43: 297-312. doi: 10.1007/BF02360536
    [31] Campbell M, Segear E, Beers L, et al. (2008) Dormancy in potato tuber meristems: Chemically induced cessation in dormancy matches the natural process based on transcript profiles. Funct Integr Genomics 8: 317-328. doi: 10.1007/s10142-008-0079-6
    [32] Navarro C, Abelenda, JA, Cruz-Oró E, et al. (2011) Control of flowering and storage organ formation in potato by FLOWERING LOCUS T. Nature 478: 119-122. doi: 10.1038/nature10431
    [33] Restrepo S, Myers KL, del Pozo O, et al. (2005) Gene profiling of a compatible interaction between Phytophthora infestans and Solanum tuberosum suggests a role for carbonic anhydrase. Mol Plant Microb Interact 18: 913-922. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-18-0913
    [34] Tai HH, Goyer C, Platt HW, et al. (2013) Decreased defense gene expression in tolerance versus resistance to Verticillium dahliae in potato. Funct Integr Genomics 13: 367-378. doi: 10.1007/s10142-013-0329-0
    [35] Schafleitner R, Gutierrez Rosales RO, Gaudin A, et al. (2007) Capturing candidate drought tolerance traits in two native Andean potato clones by transcription profiling of field grown plants under water stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 45: 673-690. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2007.06.003
    [36] Ginzberg I, Barel G, Ophir R, et al. (2009) Transcriptomic profiling of heat-stress response in potato periderm. J Exp Bot 60: 4411-4421. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp281
    [37] Evers D, Lefèvre I, Legay S, et al. (2010) Identification of drought-responsive compounds in potato through a combined transcriptomic and targeted metabolite approach. J Exp Bot 61: 2327-2343. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq060
    [38] Hancock RD, Morris WL, Ducreux LJM, et al. (2014) Physiological, biochemical and molecular responses of the potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plant to moderately elevated temperature. Plant Cell Environ 37: 439-450.
    [39] Hammond JP, Broadley MR, Bowen HC, et al. (2011) Gene expression changes in phosphorus deficient potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) leaves and the potential for diagnostic gene expression markers. PLoS One 6: e24606.
    [40] Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, et al. (2010) Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol 28: 511-515. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1621
    [41] Swarbreck D, Wilks C, Lamesch P, et al. (2008) The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): Gene structure and function annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 1009-1014.
    [42] Hazen SP, Wu Y, Kreps JA (2003) Gene expression profiling of plant responses to abiotic stress. Funct Integr Genomics 3: 105-111. doi: 10.1007/s10142-003-0088-4
    [43] Gálvez JH, Tai HH, Lagüe M, et al. (2016) The nitrogen responsive transcriptome in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) reveals significant gene regulatory motifs. Sci Rep 6: 26090.
    [44] Cho K, Cho KS, Sohn HB, et al. (2016) Network analysis of the metabolome and transcriptome reveals novel regulation of potato pigmentation. J Exp Bot 67: 1519-1533. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv549
    [45] Liu B, Zhang N, Wen Y, et al. (2015) Transcriptomic changes during tuber dormancy release process revealed by RNA sequencing in potato. J Biotechnol 198: 17-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.01.019
    [46] Goyer A, Hamlin L, Crosslin JM, et al. (2015) RNA-Seq analysis of resistant and susceptible potato varieties during the early stages of potato virus Y infection. BMC Genomics 16: 472. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1666-2
    [47] Frades I, Abreha KB, Proux-Wéra E, et al. (2015) A novel workflow correlating RNA-seq data to Phythophthora infestans resistance levels in wild Solanum species and potato clones. Front Plant Sci 6: 718.
    [48] Zhang N, Yang J, Wang Z, et al. (2014) Identification of novel and conserved microRNAs related to drought stress in potato by deep sequencing. PLoS One 9: e95489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095489
    [49] Shan J, Song W, Zhou J, et al. (2013) Transcriptome analysis reveals novel genes potentially involved in photoperiodic tuberization in potato. Genomics 102: 388-396. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2013.07.001
    [50] Gao L, Tu ZJ, Millett BP, et al. (2013) Insights into organ-specific pathogen defense responses in plants: RNA-seq analysis of potato tuber-Phytophthora infestans interactions. BMC Genomics 14: 340. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-340
    [51] Zuluaga AP, Solé M, Lu H, et al. (2015) Transcriptome responses to Ralstonia solanacearum infection in the roots of the wild potato Solanum commersonii. BMC Genomics 16: 246. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1460-1
    [52] Wheeler DL, Barrett T, Benson DA, et al. (2007) Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 5-12. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl1031
    [53] Hirsch CD, Springer NM, Hirsch CN (2015) Genomic Limitations to RNAseq Expression Profiling. Plant J 84: 491-503. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13014
    [54] Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, et al. (2000) Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 25: 25-29. doi: 10.1038/75556
    [55] Amar D, Frades I, Danek A, et al. (2014) Evaluation and integration of functional annotation pipelines for newly sequenced organisms: the potato genome as a test case. BMC Plant Biol 14: 1-14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-1
    [56] Ramšak Ž, Baebler Š, Rotter A, et al. (2014) GoMapMan: Integration, consolidation and visualization of plant gene annotations within the MapMan ontology. Nucleic Acids Res 42: 1167-1175. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1056
    [57] Swinnen G, Goossens A, Pauwels L (2016) Lessons from Domestication: Targeting Cis-Regulatory Elements for Crop Improvement. Trends Plant Sci 21: 506-515. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.01.014
    [58] Konishi M, Yanagisawa S (2011) Roles of the transcriptional regulation mediated by the nitrate-responsive cis-element in higher plants. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 411: 708-713. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.07.008
    [59] Liseron-Monfils C, Bi Y-M, Downs GS, et al. (2013) Nitrogen transporter and assimilation genes exhibit developmental stage-selective expression in maize (Zea mays L.) associated with distinct cis-acting promoter motifs. Plant Signal Behav 8: 1-14.
    [60] Pavesi G, Zambelli F, Pesole G (2007) WeederH: an algorithm for finding conserved regulatory motifs and regions in homologous sequences. BMC Bioinformatics 8: 46. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-46
    [61] Korkuc P, Schippers JHM, Walther D (2014) Characterization and Identification of cis-Regulatory Elements in Arabidopsis Based on Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Information. Plant Physiol 164: 181-200. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.229716
    [62] Sandelin A, Alkema W, Engström P, et al. (2004) JASPAR: an open-access database for eukaryotic transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res 32: D91-D94. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh012
    [63] Mathelier A, Zhao X, Zhang AW, et al. (2014) JASPAR 2014: An extensively expanded and updated open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res 42: 142-147.
    [64] Higo K, Ugawa Y, Iwamoto M, et al. (1999) Plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (PLACE) database: 1999. Nucleic Acids Res 27: 297-300. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.1.297
    [65] Aminedi R, Das N (2014) Class I patatin genes from potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivars: molecular cloning, sequence comparison, prediction of diverse cis-regulatory motifs, and assessment of the promoter activities under field and in vitro conditions. Vitr Cell Dev Biol Plant 50: 673-687.
    [66] Chen M, Zhu WJ, You X, et al. (2015) Isolation and characterization of a chalcone isomerase gene promoter from potato cultivars. Genet Mol Res 14: 18872-18885. doi: 10.4238/2015.December.28.37
    [67] Bansal A, Kumari V, Taneja D, et al. (2012) Molecular cloning and characterization of granule-bound starch synthase I (GBSSI) alleles from potato and sequence analysis for detection of cis-regulatory motifs. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 109: 247-261. doi: 10.1007/s11240-011-0090-9
    [68] Almasia NI, Narhirñak V, Hopp HE, et al. (2010) Isolation and characterization of the tissue and development-specific potato snakin-1 promoter inducible by temperature and wounding. Electron J Biotechnol 13: 1-21.
    [69] Trindade LM, Horvath B, Bachem C, et al. (2003) Isolation and functional characterization of a stolon specific promoter from potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Gene 303: 77-87. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(02)01147-2
    [70] Ancillo G, Hoegen E, Kombrink E (2003) The promoter of the potato chitinase C gene directs expression to epidermal cells. Planta 217: 566-576. doi: 10.1007/s00425-003-1029-0
    [71] Despres C, Subramaniam R, Matton DP, et al. (1995) The Activation of the Potato Pr-Loa Gene Requires the Phosphorylation of the Nuclear Factor Pbf-1. Plant Cell 7: 589-598. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.5.589
    [72] Konishi M, Yanagisawa S (2010) Identification of a nitrate-responsive cis-element in the Arabidopsis NIR1 promoter defines the presence of multiple cis-regulatory elements for nitrogen response. Plant J 63: 269-282. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04239.x
    [73] Konishi M, Yanagisawa S (2013) Arabidopsis NIN-like transcription factors have a central role in nitrate signalling. Nat Commun 4: 1617. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2621
    [74] Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, et al. (2009) MEME Suite: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 202-208. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp335
    [75] Fauteux F, Blanchette M, Strömvik MV (2008) Seeder: Discriminative seeding DNA motif discovery. Bioinformatics 24: 2303-2307. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn444
    [76] López Y, Patil A, Nakai K (2013) Identification of novel motif patterns to decipher the promoter architecture of co-expressed genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Syst Biol 7: S10.
    [77] Zolotarov Y, Strömvik M (2015) De Novo Regulatory Motif Discovery Identifies Significant Motifs in Promoters of Five Classes of Plant Dehydrin Genes. PLoS One 10: e0129016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129016
    [78] Spooner DM, Ghislain M, Simon R, et al. (2014) Systematics, Diversity, Genetics, and Evolution of Wild and Cultivated Potatoes. Bot Rev 80: 283-383. doi: 10.1007/s12229-014-9146-y
    [79] Spooner DM (2009). DNA barcoding will frequently fail in complicated groups: An example in wild potatoes. Am J Bot 96: 1177-1189. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0800246
    [80] Spooner DM, Núñez J, Trujillo G, et al. (2007) Extensive simple sequence repeat genotyping of potato landraces supports a major reevaluation of their gene pool structure and classification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 19398-19403. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709796104
    [81] Ghislain M, Andrade D, Rodríguez F, et al. (2006) Genetic analysis of the cultivated potato Solanum tuberosum L. Phureja Group using RAPDs and nuclear SSRs. Theor Appl Genet 113: 1515-1527.
    [82] Hardigan MA, Bamberg J, Buell CR, et al. (2015) Taxonomy and Genetic Differentiation among Wild and Cultivated Germplasm of sect. Petota. Plant Genome 8: 1-16.
    [83] Abyzov A, Urban AE, Snyder M, et al. (2011) CNVnator: An approach to discover, genotype, and characterize typical and atypical CNVs from family and population genome sequencing. Genome Res 21: 974-984. doi: 10.1101/gr.114876.110
    [84] Chaisson MJP, Wilson RK, Eichler EE (2015) Genetic variation and the de novo assembly of human genomes. Nat Rev Genet 16: 627-640. doi: 10.1038/nrg3933
    [85] Pendleton M, Sebra R, Pang AWC, et al. (2015) Assembly and diploid architecture of an individual human genome via single-molecule technologies. Nat Methods 12: 780-786. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3454
    [86] Aflitos S, Schijlen E, De Jong H, et al. (2014) Exploring genetic variation in the tomato (Solanum section Lycopersicon) clade by whole-genome sequencing. Plant J 80: 136-148. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12616
    [87] Ming R, VanBuren R, Wai CM, et al. (2015) The pineapple genome and the evolution of CAM photosynthesis. Nat Genet 47: 1435-1442. doi: 10.1038/ng.3435
    [88] Iorizzo M, Ellison S, Senalik D, et al. (2016) A high-quality carrot genome assembly provides new insights into carotenoid accumulation and asterid genome evolution. Nat Genet 48: 657-666. doi: 10.1038/ng.3565
    [89] Mahesh HB, Shirke MD, Singh S, et al. (2016) Indica rice genome assembly, annotation and mining of blast disease resistance genes. BMC Genomics 17: 242. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2523-7
    [90] VanBuren R, Bryant D, Edger PP, et al. (2015) Single-molecule sequencing of the desiccation-tolerant grass Oropetium thomaeum. Nature 527: 508-511. doi: 10.1038/nature15714
    [91] Eisenstein M (2015) Startups use short-read data to expand long-read sequencing market. Nat Biotechnol 33: 433-435. doi: 10.1038/nbt0515-433
    [92] Putnam NH, Connell BO, Stites JC, et al. (2016) Chromosome-scale shotgun assembly using an in vitro method for long-range linkage. Genome Res 26: 342-350. doi: 10.1101/gr.193474.115
    [93] Paajanen PM, Giolai M, Verweij W, et al. S. verrucosum, a Wild Mexican Potato As a Model Species for a Plant Genome Assembly Project. Plant and Animal Genome XXIV Conference, 2016. Available from: https://pag.confex.com/pag/xxiv/webprogram/Paper20356.html
    [94] Bredeson JV, Lyons JB, Prochnik SE, et al. (2016) Sequencing wild and cultivated cassava and related species reveals extensive interspecific hybridization and genetic diversity. Nat Biotechnol 34: 562-570. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3535
    [95] Michelmore R, Reyes Chin-Wo S, Kozik A, et al. Improvement of the Genome Assembly of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa) Using Dovetail/in vitro Proximity Ligation. Plant and Animal Genome XXIV Conference, 2016. Available from: https://pag.confex.com/pag/xxiv/webprogram/Paper22314.html
    [96] Reyes Chin-Wo S, Lavelle D, Truco MJ, et al. Dovetail/in vitro Proximity Ligation Data Facilitates Analysis of an Ancient Whole Genome Triplication Event in Lactuca sativa. Plant and Animal Genome XXIV Conference, 2016. Available from: https://pag.confex.com/pag/xxiv/webprogram/Paper19305.html
    [97] Schneeberger K, Ossowski S, Ott F, et al. (2011) Reference-guided assembly of four diverse Arabidopsis thaliana genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 10249-10254. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107739108
    [98] Yao W, Li G, Zhao H, et al. (2015) Exploring the rice dispensable genome using a metagenome-like assembly strategy. Genome Biol 16: 187. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0757-3
    [99] Johnston SA, den Nijs TPM, Peloquin SJ, et al. (1980) The significance of genic balance to endosperm development in interspecific crosses. Theor Appl Genet 57: 5-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00276002
    [100] Rodríguez F, Spooner DM (2009) Nitrate Reductase Phylogeny of Potato (Solanum sect. Petota) Genomes with Emphasis on the Origins of the Polyploid Species. Syst Bot 34: 207-219.
    [101] Hanneman RE, Bamberg JB (1986) Inventory of tuber- bearing Solanum species. University of Wisconsin Press.
    [102] Micheletto S, Boland R, Huarte M (2000) Argentinian wild diploid Solanum species as sources of quantitative late blight resistance. Theor Appl Genet 101: 902-906. doi: 10.1007/s001220051560
    [103] Andolfo G, Jupe F, Witek K, et al. (2014) Defining the full tomato NB-LRR resistance gene repertoire using genomic and cDNA RenSeq. BMC Plant Biol 14: 120. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-120
    [104] Alföldi J, Lindblad-Toh K (2013) Comparative genomics as a tool to understand evolution and disease. Genome Res 23: 1063-1068. doi: 10.1101/gr.157503.113
    [105] Uitdewilligen JGAML, Wolters AMA, D’hoop BB, et al. (2013) A Next- Generation Sequencing Method for Genotyping-by-Sequencing of Highly Heterozygous Autotetraploid Potato. PLoS One 8: 10-14.
    [106] De Donato M, Peters SO, Mitchell SE, et al. (2013) Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS): a novel, efficient and cost-effective genotyping method for cattle using next- generation sequencing. PLoS One 8: e62137. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062137
    [107] Felcher KJ, Coombs JJ, Massa AN, et al. (2012) Integration of two diploid potato linkage maps with the potato genome sequence. PLoS One 7: e36347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036347
    [108] Anithakumari AM, Tang J, van Eck HJ, et al. (2010) A pipeline for high throughput detection and mapping of SNPs from EST databases. Mol Breed 26: 65-75. doi: 10.1007/s11032-009-9377-5
    [109] Hamilton JP, Hansey CN, Whitty BR, et al. (2011) Single nucleotide polymorphism discovery in elite north american potato germplasm. BMC Genomics 12: 302. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-302
    [110] Massa AN, Manrique-Carpintero NC, Coombs JJ, et al. (2015) Genetic Linkage Mapping of Economically Important Traits in Cultivated Tetraploid Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). G3 5: 2357-2364. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.019646
    [111] Manrique-Carpintero NC, Coombs JJ, Cui Y, et al. (2015) Genetic map and QTL analysis of agronomic traits in a diploid potato population using single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Crop Sci 55: 2566-2579. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2014.10.0745
    [112] Manrique-Carpintero NC, Coombs JJ, Veilleux RE, et al. (2016) Comparative Analysis of Regions with Distorted Segregation in Three Diploid Populations of Potato. G3 6: 2617-2628. doi: 10.1534/g3.116.030031
    [113] Endelman JB, Jansky SH (2016) Genetic mapping with an inbred line-derived F2 population in potato. Theor Appl Genet 129: 935-943. doi: 10.1007/s00122-016-2673-7
    [114] Vos PG, Uitdewilligen JGAML, Voorrips RE, et al. (2015) Development and analysis of a 20K SNP array for potato (Solanum tuberosum): an insight into the breeding history. Theor Appl Genet 128: 2387-2401. doi: 10.1007/s00122-015-2593-y
    [115] Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q, et al. (2011) A robust, simple genotyping-by- sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One 6: e19379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019379
    [116] Baird NA, Etter PD, Atwood TS, et al. (2008) Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS One 3: e3376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003376
    [117] Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, et al. (2007) TASSEL: Software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23: 2633-2635. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308
    [118] Glaubitz JC, Casstevens TM, Lu F, et al. (2014) TASSEL-GBS: A High Capacity Genotyping by Sequencing Analysis Pipeline. PLoS One 9: e90346
    [119] Lu F, Lipka AE, Glaubitz J, et al. (2013) Switchgrass genomic diversity, ploidy, and evolution: novel insights from a network-based SNP discovery protocol. PLoS Genet 9: e1003215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003215
    [120] Catchen JM, Amores A, Hohenlohe P, et al. (2011) Stacks: building and genotyping Loci de novo from short-read sequences. G3 1: 171-182. doi: 10.1534/g3.111.000240
    [121] Tinker NA, Bekele WA, Hattori J (2016) Haplotag: Software for Haplotype- Based Genotyping-by-Sequencing Analysis. G3 6: 857-863. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.024596
    [122] Melo ATO, Bartaula R, Hale I (2016) GBS-SNP-CROP: a reference-optional pipeline for SNP discovery and plant germplasm characterization using variable length, paired-end genotyping-by-sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics 17: 29. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-0879-y
    [123] Poland JA, Brown PJ, Sorrells ME, et al. (2012) Development of High-Density Genetic Maps for Barley and Wheat Using a Novel Two-Enzyme Genotyping-by- Sequencing Approach. PLoS One 7: e32253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032253
    [124] Rocher S, Jean M, Castonguay Y, et al. (2015) Validation of genotyping-by- sequencing analysis in populations of tetraploid alfalfa by 454 sequencing. PLoS One 10: e0131918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131918
    [125] Labate JA, Robertson LD, Strickler SR, et al. (2014) Genetic structure of the four wild tomato species in the Solanum peruvianum s.l. species complex. Genome 57: 169-180.
    [126] Endelman J. Genotyping-By-Sequencing of a Diploid Potato F2 Population. Plant and Animal Genome XXIII, 2015. Available from: https://pag.confex.com/pag/xxiii/webprogram/Paper15683.html
    [127] Barone A (2004) Molecular marker-assisted selection for potato breeding. Am J Potato Res 81: 111-117. doi: 10.1007/BF02853608
    [128] Tiwari JK, Siddappa S, Singh BP, et al. (2013) Molecular markers for late blight resistance breeding of potato: an update. Plant Breed 132: 237-245. doi: 10.1111/pbr.12053
    [129] Song Y-S, Hepting L, Schweizer G, et al. (2005) Mapping of extreme resistance to PVY (Ry sto) on chromosome XII using anther-culture-derived primary dihaploid potato lines. Theor Appl Genet 111: 879-887. doi: 10.1007/s00122-005-0010-7
    [130] Gebhardt C, Bellin D, Henselewski H, et al. (2006) Marker-assisted combination of major genes for pathogen resistance in potato. Theor Appl Genet 112: 1458-1464. doi: 10.1007/s00122-006-0248-8
    [131] Fulladolsa AC, Navarro FM, Kota R, et al. (2015) Application of Marker Assisted Selection for Potato Virus Y Resistance in the University of Wisconsin Potato Breeding Program. Am J Potato Res 92: 444-450. doi: 10.1007/s12230-015-9431-2
    [132] Nie X, Sutherland D, Dickison V, et al. (2016) Development and Validation of High- Resolution Melting Markers Derived from Ry sto STS Markers for High-Throughput Marker-Assisted Selection of Potato Carrying Ry sto. Phytopathology 106: 1366-1375. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-05-16-0204-R
    [133] Ritter E, Debener T, Barone A, et al. (1991) RFLP mapping on potato chromosomes of two genes controlling extreme resistance to potato virus X (PVX). Mol Gen Genet 227: 81-85. doi: 10.1007/BF00260710
    [134] Simko I, Haynes KG, Ewing EE, et al. (2004) Mapping genes for resistance to Verticillium albo-atrum in tetraploid and diploid potato populations using haplotype association tests and genetic linkage analysis. Mol Genet Genomics 271: 522-531. doi: 10.1007/s00438-004-1010-z
    [135] Uribe P, Jansky S, Halterman D (2014) Two CAPS markers predict Verticillium wilt resistance in wild Solanum species. Mol Breed 33: 465-476. doi: 10.1007/s11032-013-9965-2
    [136] Li L, Tacke E, Hofferbert H-R, et al. (2013) Validation of candidate gene markers for marker-assisted selection of potato cultivars with improved tuber quality. Theor Appl Genet 126: 1039-1052. doi: 10.1007/s00122-012-2035-z
    [137] Schönhals EM, Ortega F, Barandalla L, et al. (2016). Identification and reproducibility of diagnostic DNA markers for tuber starch and yield optimization in a novel association mapping population of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Theor Appl Genet 129: 767-785. doi: 10.1007/s00122-016-2665-7
    [138] Slater AT, Cogan NOI, Forster JW, et al. (2016) Improving Genetic Gain with Genomic Selection in Autotetraploid Potato. Plant Genome 9: 1-15.
    [139] Zou C, Wang P, Xu Y (2016) Bulked sample analysis in genetics, genomics and crop improvement. Plant Biotechnol J 14: 1941-1955. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12559
    [140] Bansal V (2010) A statistical method for the detection of variants from next-generation resequencing of DNA pools. Bioinformatics 26: i318-i324. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq214
    [141] Kaminski KP, Kørup K, Andersen MN, et al. (2016) Next Generation Sequencing Bulk Segregant Analysis of Potato Support that Differential Flux into the Cholesterol and Stigmasterol Metabolite Pools Is Important for Steroidal Glycoalkaloid Content. Potato Res 59: 81-97. doi: 10.1007/s11540-015-9314-4
    [142] Hirsch CD, Hamilton JP, Childs KL, et al. (2014) Spud DB: A Resource for Mining Sequences, Genotypes, and Phenotypes to Accelerate Potato Breeding. Plant Genome 7: 1-12.
    [143] Brazma A, Parkinson H, Sarkans U, et al. (2003) ArrayExpress - A public repository for microarray gene expression data at the EBI. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 68-71. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg091
    [144] Meyer S, Nagel A, Gebhardt C (2005) PoMaMo — a comprehensive database for potato genome data. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 666-670.
    [145] Fernandez-Pozo N, Menda N, Edwards JD, et al. (2014) The Sol Genomics Network (SGN)-from genotype to phenotype to breeding. Nucleic Acids Res 43: 1-6.

  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Taiping Qu, Yangming Yue, Qirui Zhang, Cheng Wang, Zhiqiang Zhang, Guangming Lu, Wei Du, Xiuli Li, 2020, BAENET: A Brain Age Estimation Network with 3D Skipping and Outlier Constraint Loss, 978-1-5386-9330-8, 399, 10.1109/ISBI45749.2020.9098731
    2. Juan Miguel Valverde, Vandad Imani, Ali Abdollahzadeh, Riccardo De Feo, Mithilesh Prakash, Robert Ciszek, Jussi Tohka, Transfer Learning in Magnetic Resonance Brain Imaging: A Systematic Review, 2021, 7, 2313-433X, 66, 10.3390/jimaging7040066
    3. Ali Bahari Malayeri, Mohammad Mahdi Moradi, Kian Jafari Dinani, 2022, Computer-aided Brain Age Estimation via Ensemble Learning of 3D Convolutional Neural Networks, 978-1-6654-1216-2, 1, 10.1109/MVIP53647.2022.9738758
    4. Tatiana Ortegon-Sarmiento, Sousso Kelouwani, Muhammad Zeshan Alam, Alvaro Uribe-Quevedo, Ali Amamou, Patricia Paderewski-Rodriguez, Francisco Gutierrez-Vela, Analyzing Performance Effects of Neural Networks Applied to Lane Recognition under Various Environmental Driving Conditions, 2022, 13, 2032-6653, 191, 10.3390/wevj13100191
    5. Kousuke Usui, Takaaki Yoshimura, Minghui Tang, Hiroyuki Sugimori, Age Estimation from Brain Magnetic Resonance Images Using Deep Learning Techniques in Extensive Age Range, 2023, 13, 2076-3417, 1753, 10.3390/app13031753
    6. Yuanbo Xie, Haitao Jiang, Hongwei Du, Jinzhang Xu, Bensheng Qiu, Fasu-Net: Fast Alzheimer’s Disease Screening with Undersampled MRI Using Convolutional Neural Networks, 2021, 11, 2156-7018, 2301, 10.1166/jmihi.2021.3829
    7. Yunfei Gao, Albert No, Age Estimation from fMRI Data Using Recurrent Neural Network, 2022, 12, 2076-3417, 749, 10.3390/app12020749
    8. Dominik Bittner, Ricky-Ricardo Hendricks, Luca Horn, Jürgen Mottok, 2023, In-depth Benchmarking of Transfer Learning Techniques for Improved Bottle Recognition, 979-8-3503-3337-4, 1, 10.1109/ICPRS58416.2023.10178995
    9. Heejoo Lim, Yoonji Joo, Eunji Ha, Yumi Song, Sujung Yoon, Taehoon Shin, Brain Age Prediction Using Multi-Hop Graph Attention Combined with Convolutional Neural Network, 2024, 11, 2306-5354, 265, 10.3390/bioengineering11030265
    10. David A. Wood, Matthew Townend, Emily Guilhem, Sina Kafiabadi, Ahmed Hammam, Yiran Wei, Ayisha Al Busaidi, Asif Mazumder, Peter Sasieni, Gareth J. Barker, Sebastien Ourselin, James H. Cole, Thomas C. Booth, Optimising brain age estimation through transfer learning: A suite of pre‐trained foundation models for improved performance and generalisability in a clinical setting, 2024, 45, 1065-9471, 10.1002/hbm.26625
    11. Wen-Yih Isaac Tseng, Yung-Chin Hsu, Li-Kai Huang, Chien-Tai Hong, Yueh-Hsun Lu, Jia-Hung Chen, Chin-Kun Fu, Lung Chan, Brain Age Is Associated with Cognitive Outcomes of Cholinesterase Inhibitor Treatment in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment, 2024, 98, 13872877, 1095, 10.3233/JAD-231109
    12. Fatma Eltashani, Mario Parreno-Centeno, James H. Cole, João Paulo Papa, Fumie Costen, Brain Age Prediction Using a Lightweight Convolutional Neural Network, 2025, 13, 2169-3536, 6750, 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3526520
    13. Hamed Amin, Farideh Ebrahimi, Mehdi Ezoji, T1-weighted structural Magnetic Resonance Images-driven brain age estimation in epileptic patients using convolutional neural networks, 2026, 111, 17468094, 108471, 10.1016/j.bspc.2025.108471
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2017 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
AIMS Agriculture and Food
1.3 3.9

Metrics

Article views(12778) PDF downloads(2151) Cited by(10)

Article has an altmetric score of 11
Article has an altmetric score of 11
Preview PDF
Download XML
Export Citation
Article outline
Abstract
References

Figures and Tables

Tables(3)

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

Copyright © AIMS Press

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog