Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Improving rice-based rainfed production systems in Southeast Asia for contributing towards food security and rural development through sustainable crop production intensification

1 Asian Center of Innovation for Sustainable Agriculture Intensification, Asian Institute of Technology, P. O. Box 4, Klong Luang, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand
2 FAO Inter-Country IPM/Pesticide Risk Reduction Programme, FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, 39 Phra Athit Road, Bangkok 10200, Thailand

Special Editions: Sustainable Crop Production Intensification

Continuing degradation of the environment and the cumulating food, energy, water and financial crises have led to a situation where many people’s access to sufficient, nutritious food is affected as well as their livelihoods, income, and ultimate food and nutrition security. In the wake of these stresses and crises, there is an emerging interest to find efficient, easily accessible and sustainable approaches that can address these crises. One candidate for this is the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) with its “less can produce more” prescription. A regional collaborative project currently underway is being implemented in rainfed areas of the Lower Mekong River Basin (LMB) countries. This involves smallholder rice farmers, researchers, extension personnel, and development professionals, together with staff of relevant government ministries (http://www.sri-lmb.ait.asia/). The project objective is to produce healthier and profitable rice crops under rainfed conditions using SRI methods, evaluated and refined through farmers’ participatory action research (FPAR). As part of the action-research, more than 120 sets of field experiments have been carried out at 60 FPAR sites in Cambodia and Thailand, directly involving 3600 farmers. The experiments have ranged from the integration of many SRI principles with farmers’ current local practices or improved practices which was termed as “SRI-transition” to full demonstrations and assessments of SRI methodology, i.e., SRI demonstration. The initial calculation of yields has showed an average paddy yield of 5.03 t/ha with SRI-transition, whereas with SRI-demonstration the average yield was 6.41 t/ha. These yields were 60 and 100% higher than the average baseline yield in the region, 3.14 t/ha, for the same farmers and same locales. Productivity gains (dollars gained/dollars spent per ha) were calculated for both rainfed and irrigated production areas. In comparative terms, the economic gains for farmers were found to be higher in rainfed areas when using the new methods. This paper addresses the potential of new strategies to promote food security in rainfed areas in the LMB region by managing household and natural resources more productively.
  Article Metrics


1. Matsuo K (2002) Development of upland cropping systems for Crop-Animal integrated farming systems in Northeast Thailand. Report of Japan International Research Centre for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS), Department of Agriculture (DOA) and Khon Kaen University (KKU), Thailand.

2. MAFF (2008) Report on Activities of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Workshop on National Achievement in 2007-2008 and Planning for 2008-2009. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 2-3 April 2008 (in Khmer).

3. FAO (2004) FAOSTAT. Available from: http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx

4. Kirby M, Mainuddin M (2006) Water Productivity Assessment: Mekong River Basin Approach, BFP Working Paper 4. In: An advance edition of a working paper on the assessment of water productivity from the approach of the Mekong River Basin. Available from: http://www.waterandfood.org/fileadmin/CPWF_Documents/Documents/Basin_Focal_Projects/BFP_Publications/MekongBasinWaterProductivityBFPwp04Draft02.pdf

5. UN Population Division (2006) World Population Prospects: The 2006 Revision. Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wpp2006/wpp2006.htm

6. Nesbitt HJ (2005) Water Used for Agriculture in the Lower Mekong Basin. MRC Technical paper No 11, Mekong River Commission, Vientiane.

7. Molle F, Wester P, Hirsch P, et al. (2007) River basin development and management. In: Water for Food Water for Life, A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. Molden, D. (Eds.). London Earthscan. 585-625.

8. Behera D, Chaudhary AK, Vutukuru VK, et al. (2013) Enhancing agricultural livelihoods through community institutions in Bihar, India, In: South Asia rural livelihoods. Series 3 note no. 1. Washington D.C., The Worldbank.

9. Mishra A, Whitten M, Ketelaar JW, et al. (2006) The system of rice intensification (SRI): a challenge for science, and an opportunity for farmer empowerment towards sustainable agriculture. Int J Agric Sustain 4: 193-212.    

10. Mishra A, Kumar P, Noble A (2013) Assessing the potential of SRI management principles and the FFS approach in Northeast Thailand for sustainable rice intensification in the context of climate change. Int J Agric Sustain 11: 4-22.    

11. Uphoff N, Randriamiharisoa R (2002) Possibilities for reducing water use in irrigated rice production through the Madagascar System of Rice Intensification, In: Water-Wise Rice Production. Bouman B et al. (Eds.). Los Banos, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute. 71-88.

12. Kabir H, Uphoff N (2007) Results of disseminating the system of rice intensification with farmer field school methods in Northern Myanmar. Exp Agric 43: 463-476.    

13. Mishra A, Salokhe VM (2008) Growing More Rice with Less Water in Asia: Identifying and Exploring Opportunities through System of Rice Intensification, In: Agricultural Systems: Economics, Technology and Diversity. Oliver, W. Castalonge (Eds.). Hauppauge, New York: Nova Science Publishers. 173-191.

14. Cohen J (1992) Statistical power analysis. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 1: 98-101.    

15. FAO Rice Market Monitor (2015) Volume XVIII, Issue No 2, July 2015. Available from: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/est/COMM_MARKETS_MONITORING/Rice/Images/RMM/RMM_JUL15_H.pdf

16. Birdsall N, Ross D, Sabot R (1995) Inequality and growth reconsidered: lessons from East Asia. World Bank Econ Rev 9: 477-508.    

17. Dawe D (1996) A new look at the effects of export instability on investment and growth. World Dev 24: 1905-1914.    

18. Mishra A, Salokhe VM (2010) The effects of planting pattern and water regime on root morphology, physiology and grain yield in rice. J Agron Crop Sci 196: 368-378.    

19. Mishra A, Salokhe VM (2011) Rice root growth and physiological responses to SRI water management and implications for crop productivity. Paddy Water Environ 9: 41-52.    

20. Mishra A, Uphoff NT (2013) Morphological and physiological responses of rice root and shoots to varying water regimes and soil microbial densities. Arch Agron Soil Sci 59: 705-731.    

21. Horie T, Shiraiwa T, Homma K, et al. (2005). Can yields of lowland rice resume the increases that they showed in the 1980s? Plant Prod Sci 8: 251-272.    

22. Thakur AK, Uphoff NT, Stoop WA (2015) Scientific underpinnings of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI): What is known so far? Adv Agron 135: 147-179    

23. Mishra A, Kumar P (2015) Sustaining and Enhancing the Momentum for Innovation and Learning around the System of Rice Intensification (SRI) in the Lower Mekong River Basin. Regional Review and Planning Workshop Report. 40p. Available from: http://www.sri-lmb.ait.asia/country/doc/Regional%20Review%20and%20Planning%20Workshop-REPORT%20(02-03%20June%202015).pdf

24. Isvilanonda S, Kao-ent S (2009) Dynamics of Thailand Rice production economy and future outlook. A paper presented to Thailand Research Fund, Bangkok.

Copyright Info: © 2016, Abha Mishra, et al., licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved