As the focus of the new round of technological revolution, it is crucial to explore the role of artificial intelligence (AI) technology innovation in improving total factor productivity (TFP). Based on the data from 30 Chinese provinces from 2003 to 2021, this article measured AI innovation using the number of patent applications and empirically investigated the effects of AI technology innovation on TFP. The results demonstrated that AI technology innovation exerts significantly positive influences on the TFP. The mechanism analyses revealed that AI technology innovation improves TFP by upgrading industrial structures and promoting human capital. The subsample results indicated that the promotion effect of AI technology innovation on TFP is significant only in areas with high levels of marketization, financial development, and digital infrastructure. The panel quantile regression results indicated that as the TFP increases, the promoting effect of AI technology innovation on TFP gradually strengthens. This study offers comprehensive empirical evidence for understanding the impacts of AI technology innovation on TFP, giving a reference for further enhancing the level of AI development and promoting a sustainable economic development.
Citation: Shuang Luo, Wenting Lei, Peng Hou. Impact of artificial intelligence technology innovation on total factor productivity: an empirical study based on provincial panel data in China[J]. National Accounting Review, 2024, 6(2): 172-194. doi: 10.3934/NAR.2024008
[1] | Shashi Bahl, Tarunpreet Singh, Virinder Kumar, Shankar Sehgal, Ashok Kumar Bagha . A systematic review on recent progress in advanced joining techniques of the lightweight materials. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(1): 62-81. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021005 |
[2] | Ehsan Harati, Paul Kah . Laser welding of aluminum battery tab to variable Al/Cu busbars in Li-ion battery joint. AIMS Materials Science, 2022, 9(6): 884-918. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022053 |
[3] | Jia Tian, Yue He, Fangpei Li, Wenbo Peng, Yongning He . Laser surface processing technology for performance enhancement of TENG. AIMS Materials Science, 2025, 12(1): 1-22. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2025001 |
[4] | Eko Sasmito Hadi, Ojo Kurdi, Ari Wibawa BS, Rifky Ismail, Mohammad Tauviqirrahman . Influence of laser processing conditions for the manufacture of microchannels on ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene coated with PDMS and PAA. AIMS Materials Science, 2022, 9(4): 554-571. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022033 |
[5] | R.C.M. Sales-Contini, J.P. Costa, F.J.G. Silva, A.G. Pinto, R.D.S.G. Campilho, I.M. Pinto, V.F.C. Sousa, R.P. Martinho . Influence of laser marking parameters on data matrix code quality on polybutylene terephthalate/glass fiber composite surface using microscopy and spectroscopy techniques. AIMS Materials Science, 2024, 11(1): 150-172. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024009 |
[6] | Alain Mauger, Haiming Xie, Christian M. Julien . Composite anodes for lithium-ion batteries: status and trends. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(3): 1054-1106. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.3.1054 |
[7] | Tomasz Blachowicz, Kamila Pająk, Przemysław Recha, Andrea Ehrmann . 3D printing for microsatellites-material requirements and recent developments. AIMS Materials Science, 2020, 7(6): 926-938. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2020.6.926 |
[8] | Vijaykumar S Jatti, Nitin K Khedkar, Vinaykumar S Jatti, Pawandeep Dhall . Investigating the effect of cryogenic treatment of workpieces and tools on electrical discharge machining performance. AIMS Materials Science, 2022, 9(6): 835-862. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022051 |
[9] | G. A. El-Awadi . Review of effective techniques for surface engineering material modification for a variety of applications. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(4): 652-692. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023037 |
[10] | Yakkaluri Pratapa Reddy, Kavuluru Lakshmi Narayana, Mantrala Kedar Mallik, Christ Prakash Paul, Ch. Prem Singh . Experimental evaluation of additively deposited functionally graded material samples-microscopic and spectroscopic analysis of SS-316L/Co-Cr-Mo alloy. AIMS Materials Science, 2022, 9(4): 653-667. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022040 |
As the focus of the new round of technological revolution, it is crucial to explore the role of artificial intelligence (AI) technology innovation in improving total factor productivity (TFP). Based on the data from 30 Chinese provinces from 2003 to 2021, this article measured AI innovation using the number of patent applications and empirically investigated the effects of AI technology innovation on TFP. The results demonstrated that AI technology innovation exerts significantly positive influences on the TFP. The mechanism analyses revealed that AI technology innovation improves TFP by upgrading industrial structures and promoting human capital. The subsample results indicated that the promotion effect of AI technology innovation on TFP is significant only in areas with high levels of marketization, financial development, and digital infrastructure. The panel quantile regression results indicated that as the TFP increases, the promoting effect of AI technology innovation on TFP gradually strengthens. This study offers comprehensive empirical evidence for understanding the impacts of AI technology innovation on TFP, giving a reference for further enhancing the level of AI development and promoting a sustainable economic development.
Laser technology was studied intensively over the past few decades before entering some stagnation. However, recent developments around robotic welding [1,2,3], laser texturing and marking [4,5,6], laser cutting [7,8,9], and additive manufacturing [10,11,12,13,14,15] have led to a new wave of studies in this area of knowledge, which led to the creation of this Special Issue. In fact, the development of lasers whose wavelength is compatible with transmission through optical fibers has allowed for a wider range of applications, as it means that the generation system does not need to be placed at the end of the robotic arm, requiring more robust robots, or limiting the range of applications [16]. The texturing of very hard materials, namely ceramic composites used in cutting tools [17], has recently become an effective application of laser technology. This has the potential of improving the machinability of some materials as well as the marking of practically any material [18], allowing increased traceability by directly marking quick-response codes (QR codes) on the product.
Indeed, long gone are the times when laser technology was essentially used to cut the most diverse materials. Currently, laser technology is being investigated and used in the most diverse applications, from the medical field to the area of military defense or the monitoring of operations and processes. The evolution toward pulsed lasers and the development of more accurate control mechanisms have drastically expanded their application in industrial processes. This has created countless research opportunities aimed at characterizing and optimizing their use with different materials and understanding the phenomena associated with their application.
The evolution and volume of research linked to laser technology justifies the publication of this Special Issue, which presents some of the most recent technological advances in laser applications in materials and nanofabrication processes. Two excellent articles on laser applications are part of this volume. One is aimed at the application of laser by the holographic method for stress verification in polymeric materials [19]; the other demonstrates the optimal parameters of laser marking on composite materials to obtain surfaces with high roughness that are visible to the laser reader [20].
The first work, published by da Silva et al. [19] and titled "Holographic method for stress distribution analysis in photoelastic materials", focuses on a polymer sample and generates three independent waves polarized at 45, 0, and 90°, producing two distinct holograms resulting in interference patterns. The optical information obtained through photoelasticity is used to derive the stress-optic law, which is implicitly correlated with the holographic method. Finally, the Fresnel transform is applied to digitally reconstruct and obtain the demodulated phase maps for compression and decompression and finally calculate the Poisson's coefficient of the material. The results demonstrated that the stress distributions derived through holography were more accurate and reproducible than those obtained via photoelasticity when compared with theoretical results.
The second paper, published by Sales-Contini et al. [20] and titled "Influence of laser marking parameters on data matrix code quality on polybutylene terephthalate/glass fiber composite surface using microscopy and spectroscopy techniques", performs a detailed morphological analysis of the surface of the neodymium-doped yttrium-aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser-marked composite material. Process parameters were selected, and laser-marked data matrix codes (DMCs) were analyzed to assess quality according to ISO/IEC 29158:2020 standards; this was combined with a detailed surface analysis to observe physical and chemical changes using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). This work complements the previously published results by Sales-Contini et al. [6].
Two other articles involve nanofabrication processes: a review article published by Equbal et al. [21] and another one, published by Dawood and AlAmeen [22], that presents recent findings in the study of fatigue and mechanical properties of specimens produced by three-dimensional (3D) printing. The first presents a detailed study of recently (from 2020 to 2024) published works in fused deposition modeling (FDM) collected from Scopus and Web of Science data using "FDM" and "dimensional accuracy" as keywords. The study mainly focuses on the improvement of process accuracy over 4 years of research and studies the main factors that can interfere with the printing quality of components during the use of the FDM additive manufacturing process. The most recent work presents the fatigue study of carbon fiber-reinforced polylactic acid (CF-PLA) composite samples manufactured with three different 3D printed patterns: gyroid, tri-hexagon, and triangular with three different infill levels. The mechanical properties of traction, flexure, and impact were systematically obtained, and the durability of the material was analyzed by fatigue tests. The results demonstrated that the gyroid infill pattern had the best performance; also, by increasing the infill rate, it was possible to obtain an 82% increase in the ultimate tensile strength. This study demonstrates the applicability of different types of infill to obtain the best mechanical properties, reducing material use and being a sustainable process.
Research into laser technology is still very much alive and increasingly diverse, given the expansion of fields of application. This Special Issue presents some of the most recent developments around this technology, hoping that they can be of great use to the scientific community.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
Writing draft and review: F.J.G-Silva and R.C.M. Sales-Contini.
Francisco J. G. Silva and Rita C. M. Sales-Contini are on a special issue editorial board for AIMS Materials Science and were not involved in the editorial review or the decision to publish this article. All authors declare that there are no competing interests.
[1] |
Acemoglu D, Autor D, Dorn D, et al. (2014) Return of the solow paradox? It, productivity, and employment in US Manufacturing. Am Econ Rev 104: 394–399. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.5.394 doi: 10.1257/aer.104.5.394
![]() |
[2] | Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2019) Artificial intelligence, automation and work. In: Agrawal, A., Gans, J., Goldfarb, A., (eds), The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, University of Chicago Press, 197–236. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226613475.003.0008 |
[3] |
Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2018) The race between man and machine: implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. Am Econ Rev 108: 1488–1542. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20160696 doi: 10.1257/aer.20160696
![]() |
[4] |
Aghion P, Blundell RW, Griffith R, et al. (2009) The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity. Rev Econ Stat 91: 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.1.20 doi: 10.1162/rest.91.1.20
![]() |
[5] | Aghion P, Howitt P (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60: 323–351. |
[6] |
Alrowwad A, Abualooush SH, Masa'Deh R (2020) Innovation and intellectual capital as intermediary variables among transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and organizational performance. J Manag Dev 39: 196–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-02-2019-0062 doi: 10.1108/JMD-02-2019-0062
![]() |
[7] | Brynjolfsson E, Rock D, Syverson C (2019) Artificial intelligence and the modern productivity paradox: a clash of expectations and statistics. In: Agrawal, A., Gans, J., Goldfarb, A., (eds), The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, University of Chicago Press, 23–60. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226613475.003.0001 |
[8] |
Cao J, Law SH, Samad ARBA, et al. (2022) Effect of financial development and technological innovation on green growth-analysis based on spatial durbin model. J Clean Prod 365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132865 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132865
![]() |
[9] |
Chang L, Taghizadeh-Hesary F, Mohsin M (2023) Role of artificial intelligence on green economic development: joint determinates of natural resources and green total factor productivity. Resour Policy 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103508 doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103508
![]() |
[10] |
Dong F, Hu MY, Gao YJ, et al. (2022) How does digital economy affect carbon emissions? Evidence from global 60 countries. Sci Total Environ 852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158401 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158401
![]() |
[11] |
Galor O, Moav O (2002) Natural selection and the origin of economic growth. Q J Econ 117: 1133–1191. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302320935007 doi: 10.1162/003355302320935007
![]() |
[12] |
Ge P, Liu T, Huang X (2023) The effects and drivers of green financial reform in promoting environmentally-biased technological progress. J Environ Manage 339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117915. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117915
![]() |
[13] | Graetz G, Michaels G (2015) Robots at work: the impact on productivity and jobs. Centre for Economic Performance, LSE. |
[14] |
Hopenhayn HA (2014) Firms, misallocation, and aggregate productivity: a review. Annu Rev Econom 6: 735–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-082912-110223 doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-082912-110223
![]() |
[15] |
Jiang J, Su P, Ge Z (2021) The high-and new-technology enterprise identification, marketization process and the total factor productivity of enterprise. Kybernetes 50: 528–549. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-11-2019-0743 doi: 10.1108/K-11-2019-0743
![]() |
[16] | Jiang W, Li P (2022) Ai and tfp: "technology dividend" or "technology gap". J Stat Inform 37:26–35. |
[17] |
Kijek A, Kijek T (2020) Nonlinear effects of human capital and r & d on tfp: evidence from european regions. Sustainability 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051808 doi: 10.3390/su12051808
![]() |
[18] |
Lee H, Yang SA, Kim K (2019) The role of fintech in mitigating information friction in supply chain finance. Asian Development Bank Economics Working Paper Series. http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/WPS190574-2 doi: 10.22617/WPS190574-2
![]() |
[19] |
Lei Z, Wang D (2023) Digital transformation and total factor productivity: empirical evidence from china. Plos One 18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292972 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292972
![]() |
[20] | Lewbel A (1997) Constructing instruments for regressions with measurement error when no additional data are available, with an application to patents and r & d. Econometrica, 1201–1213. |
[21] | Liang S, Dong Q (2023) Management's macroeconomic cognition and corporate default risk. J Quant Technol Econ 40:200–220. |
[22] |
Lin B, Zhu J (2019) The role of renewable energy technological innovation on climate change: empirical evidence from china. Sci Total Environ 659: 1505–1512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.449 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.449
![]() |
[23] |
Liu J, Chang H, Forrest JY, et al. (2020) Influence of artificial intelligence on technological innovation: evidence from the panel data of china's manufacturing sectors. Technol Forecast Soc 158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120142 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120142
![]() |
[24] |
Meng T, Yu D, Ye L, et al. (2023) Impact of digital city competitiveness on total factor productivity in the commercial circulation industry: evidence from china's emerging first-tier cities. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02390-7 doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-02390-7
![]() |
[25] |
Nordhaus WD (2021) Are we approaching an economic singularity? Information technology and the future of economic growth. Am Econ J Macroecon 13: 299–332. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20170105 doi: 10.1257/mac.20170105
![]() |
[26] | Pan W, He Z, Pan H (2021) Research on spatiotemporal evolution and distribution dynamics of digital economy development in china. China Soft Sci 10: 137–147. |
[27] |
Pan X, Chu J, Tian M, et al. (2022) Non-linear effects of outward foreign direct investment on total factor energy efficiency in china. Energy 239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122293 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122293
![]() |
[28] |
Ren XH, Zeng GD, Gozgor G (2023) How does digital finance affect industrial structure upgrading? Evidence from chinese prefecture-level cities. J Environ Manage 330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117125 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117125
![]() |
[29] | Ren Y, Liu Y, Li H (2023) Artificial intelligence technology innovationand enterprise total factor productivity. Bus Manag J 45: 50–60. |
[30] |
Song W, Mao H, Han X (2021) The two-sided effects of foreign direct investment on carbon emissions performance in china. Sci Total Environ 791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148331 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148331
![]() |
[31] |
Tang C, Xu YY, Hao Y, et al. (2021) What is the role of telecommunications infrastructure construction in green technology innovation? A firm-level analysis for china. Energ Econ 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105576 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105576
![]() |
[32] | Tang S, Lai X, Huang R (2019) How can fintech innovation affect tfp: facilitating or inhibiting? theoretical analysis framework and regional practice. China Soft Sci 7: 134–144. |
[33] | Tang S, Wu X, Zhu J (2020) Digital Finance and Enterprise Technology Innovation: Structural Feature, Mechanism Identification and Effect Difference under Financial Supervision. Manag World 36: 52–66. |
[34] | Valli V, Saccone D (2009) Structural change and economic development in china and india. Eur J Comp Econ 6 |
[35] |
Wang CG, Liu TS, Zhu Y, et al. (2022) Digital economy, environmental regulation and corporate green technology innovation: evidence from china. Int J Env Res Pub He 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114084. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114084
![]() |
[36] |
Wang KL, Sun TT, Xu RY, et al. (2023) The impact of artificial intelligence on total factor productivity: empirical evidence from china's manufacturing enterprises. Econ Change Restruct 56: 1113–1146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-022-09467-4 doi: 10.1007/s10644-022-09467-4
![]() |
[37] | Wang X, Fan G (2000) Sustainability of china's economic growth. Economic Science Press, Shanghai. |
[38] | Wang X, Hu L, Fan G (2021) Marketization index of china's provinces:neri report 2021. Social Sciences Academic Press (China). |
[39] | Wang Z, Han C, Zhu W (2022) Research on the impact of digital finance development on complexity of export technology. World Econ Stud 8: 26–42. |
[40] |
Xiong J, Chen L (2022) Dialect diversity and total factor productivity: evidence from chinese listed companies. Front Psychol 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017397 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017397
![]() |
[41] |
Yan Z, Zou B, Du K, Li K (2020) Do renewable energy technology innovations promote china's green productivity growth? Fresh evidence from partially linear functional-coefficient models. Energ Econ 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104842 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104842
![]() |
[42] |
Yao S, Zhang S, Zhang X (2019) Renewable energy, carbon emission and economic growth: a revised environmental kuznets curve perspective. J Clean Prod 235: 1338–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.069 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.069
![]() |
[43] |
You J, Xiao H (2022) Can fdi facilitate green total factor productivity in china? Evidence from regional diversity. Environ Sci Pollut R 29: 49309–49321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18059-0 doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18059-0
![]() |
[44] |
Zeng S, Shu X, Ye W (2022) Total factor productivity and high-quality economic development: a theoretical and empirical analysis of the yangtze river economic belt, china. Int J Env Res Pub He 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052783 doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052783
![]() |
[45] |
Zhai S, Liu Z (2023) Artificial intelligence technology innovation and firm productivity: evidence from china. Financ Res Lett 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104437 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2023.104437
![]() |
[46] | Zhang B, Sun X (2015) Total factor productivity of economic growth. Journal of Ocean University of China (Social Sciences), 73–78. |
[47] | Zhang J, Wu G, Peng J (2004) The estimation of china's provincial capital stock: 1952–2000. Economic Research Journal, 33–44. |
[48] |
Zheng W, Walsh PP (2019) Economic growth, urbanization and energy consumption - a provincial level analysis of china. Energ Econ 80: 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.01.004 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.01.004
![]() |
[49] |
Zhou C, Sun Z, Qi S, et al. (2023) Green credit guideline and enterprise export green-sophistication. J Environ Manage 336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117648 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117648
![]() |
[50] |
Zou S, Liao Z, Fan X (2024) The impact of the digital economy on urban total factor productivity: mechanisms and spatial spillover effects. Sci Rep-Uk 14: 396. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49915-3 doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49915-3
![]() |