
The fractional sine series (FRSS) and the fractional cosine series (FRCS) were defined. Three types of discrete convolution operations for FRCS and FRSS were introduced, along with a detailed investigation into their corresponding convolution theorems. The interrelationship between these convolution operations was also discussed. Additionally, as an application of the presented results, two forms of discrete convolution equations based on the proposed convolution theorems were examined, resulting in explicit solutions for these equations. Furthermore, numerical simulations were provided to demonstrate that our proposed solution can be easily implemented with low computational complexity.
Citation: Rongbo Wang, Qiang Feng, Jinyi Ji. The discrete convolution for fractional cosine-sine series and its application in convolution equations[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 2641-2656. doi: 10.3934/math.2024130
[1] | Snježana Maksimović, Sanja Atanasova, Zoran D. Mitrović, Salma Haque, Nabil Mlaiki . Abelian and Tauberian results for the fractional Fourier cosine (sine) transform. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 12225-12238. doi: 10.3934/math.2024597 |
[2] | Ahmed Salem, Kholoud N. Alharbi . Fractional infinite time-delay evolution equations with non-instantaneous impulsive. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 12943-12963. doi: 10.3934/math.2023652 |
[3] | Ahu Ercan . Comparative analysis for fractional nonlinear Sturm-Liouville equations with singular and non-singular kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13325-13343. doi: 10.3934/math.2022736 |
[4] | Yue Liang . Study on the controllability of delayed evolution inclusions involving fractional derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 17984-17996. doi: 10.3934/math.2024876 |
[5] | Amir Ali, Abid Ullah Khan, Obaid Algahtani, Sayed Saifullah . Semi-analytical and numerical computation of fractal-fractional sine-Gordon equation with non-singular kernels. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14975-14990. doi: 10.3934/math.2022820 |
[6] | Altyeb Taha . A novel deep learning-based hybrid Harris hawks with sine cosine approach for credit card fraud detection. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 23200-23217. doi: 10.3934/math.20231180 |
[7] | Yong-Ki Ma, Marimuthu Mohan Raja, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Anurag Shukla, Velusamy Vijayakumar . Results on controllability for Sobolev type fractional differential equations of order $ 1 < r < 2 $ with finite delay. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10215-10233. doi: 10.3934/math.2022568 |
[8] | Ali Khalouta, Abdelouahab Kadem . A new computational for approximate analytical solutions of nonlinear time-fractional wave-like equations with variable coefficients. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 1-14. doi: 10.3934/math.2020001 |
[9] | Ali Khalouta, Abdelouahab Kadem . A new numerical technique for solving Caputo time-fractional biological population equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(5): 1307-1319. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.5.1307 |
[10] | Erdal Bas, Ramazan Ozarslan, Resat Yilmazer . Spectral structure and solution of fractional hydrogen atom difference equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1359-1371. doi: 10.3934/math.2020093 |
The fractional sine series (FRSS) and the fractional cosine series (FRCS) were defined. Three types of discrete convolution operations for FRCS and FRSS were introduced, along with a detailed investigation into their corresponding convolution theorems. The interrelationship between these convolution operations was also discussed. Additionally, as an application of the presented results, two forms of discrete convolution equations based on the proposed convolution theorems were examined, resulting in explicit solutions for these equations. Furthermore, numerical simulations were provided to demonstrate that our proposed solution can be easily implemented with low computational complexity.
Convolution plays an important role in various fields, including integral evaluation, numerical analysis, solving differential and integral equations, mathematical physics [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] and filter design for signal processing [10,11,12,13,14]. The importance of different convolutions lies in their diverse properties and applications that they are able to exhibit [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Therefore, it is worthwhile and interesting to continually investigate convolution and associated theorems due to their high potential for revealing new properties and concrete applications
The discrete Fourier transforms [25] and the discrete fractional transform [26] have emerged as significant tools in digital signal processing, given that practical data is predominantly processed at discrete samples. Extensive research has been conducted on the discrete Fourier cosine convolution and the discrete Fourier sine convolution associated with the Fourier cosine and sine series, resulting in numerous valuable theoretical achievements including Titchmarsh's type theorem, discrete Young's type theorem and Watson's type theorem [27,28,29,30], as well as the application of discrete fractional calculus [31,32]. However, while the theory of discrete convolution for fractional cosine and sine series is still in its early stages, it provides a driving force toward formulating a discrete fractional cosine and sine series. Additionally, compared to the Fourier transform, which lacks free parameters, the fractional transform offers enhanced flexibility and processing capabilities. Therefore, exploring the define fractional cosine series (FRCS) and fractional sine series (FRSS), along with their corresponding convolution theorems and applications, is both theoretically intriguing and practically beneficial.
The convolution equation has found significant applications in diverse fields such as engineering mechanics, energy transfer and membrane or axis oscillation, particularly when addressing problems related to the electrostatic field and magnetic field synthesis as well as the digital signal processing (see [3,4,7,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,32,33]). Obtaining solutions for these convolution equations is a meaningful issue in equation theory that has been extensively studied by many researchers.
Taking this opportunity, our primary objective is to introduce the concept of FRCS and FRSS while exploring their fundamental properties and applications in convolution equations. This paper makes a threefold contribution: First, we extend the Fourier sine series (FSS) and the Fourier cosine series (FCS) into the fractional domain by providing definitions for the FRSS and the FRCS. Second, we propose three types of convolution operations for FRSS and FRCS, derive corresponding convolution theorems and discuss the relationship between two discrete convolution operations. The classical Fourier series results can be viewed as a special case of the derived results in this paper. Third, the application of the discrete fractional cosine-sine series convolution is discussed, and solutions for two types of convolution equations are analyzed with numerical simulations demonstrating that our proposed solution is easily implementable with low computational complexity.
The structure of this paper is outlined as follows: Section 2 reviews the convolution operations for Fourier sine and cosine series, along with their associated convolution theorems. In Section 3, three distinct convolution operations for FRSS and FRCS are presented in detail together with derived convolution theorems. Section 4 investigates the relationship between two discrete convolution operations, while Section 5 discusses two types of convolution equations. Finally, conclusions are summarized in Section 6.
In this section, we mainly review the Fourier cosine and sine series, discrete convolution and the corresponding convolution theorem relevant to this study.
The discrete Fourier cosine convolution (x∗FcDTy)(n) [29] and the discrete Fourier sine convolution (x∗FsDTy)(n) [30] of two series x(n) and y(n) on N are defined as follows:
(x∗FcDTy)(n)=∞∑m=1x(m)[y(n+m)+y(|n−m|)]+x(0)y(n), n≥0 | (2.1) |
and
(x∗FsDTy)(n)=∞∑m=1x(m)[y(|n−m|)−y(n+m)], n≥0, | (2.2) |
respectively. The following two convolution theorems fulfill
FcDT{(x∗FcDTy)(n)}(w)=2FcDT{x(n)}(w)FcDT{y(n)}(w) | (2.3) |
and
FsDT{(x∗FsDTy)(n)}(w)=2FsDT{x(n)}(w)FcDT{y(n)}(w), | (2.4) |
respectively, where FcDT denotes the FCS
FcDTx(n)(ω)=x(0)2+∞∑n=1x(n)cos(nω), ω∈[0,π], | (2.5) |
and FsDT denotes the FSS
FsDTx(n)(ω)=∞∑n=0x(n)sin(nω), ω∈[0,π]. | (2.6) |
Let ℓp(N), 1≤p<∞, denote the space of sequences x={x(n)} equipped with a norm
‖x‖p=(∞∑n=1|x(n)|p)1p<∞, 1≤p<∞ | (2.7) |
and
‖x‖∞=supn≥0|xn|<∞, | (2.8) |
where ℓ1(N) is equipped with a norm
‖x‖=(∞∑n=1|x(n)|), |
and ℓop(N) is its subspace with x(0)=0.
In this section, we present the definitions of FRSS and FRCS, followed by three novel types of convolution operations for FRSS and FRCS. We also explore the relationships among these defined convolution operations and derive corresponding convolution theorems for FRCS and FRSS
Definition 3.1. Let α∈R, a sequence {x(n)}∈ℓ1(N) and the FRCS and the FRSS be defined as
Sαcx(n)(w)=2∞∑n=0x(n)Kφ(n,w)cos(cscφ⋅nw), w∈[0,π] | (3.1) |
and
Sαsx(n)(w)=∞∑n=0x(n)Kφ(n,w)sin(cscφ⋅nw), w∈[0,π], | (3.2) |
respectively, where Kφ(n,w) is given by
Kφ(n,ω)={Aφejn2+w22cotφ,φ≠kπ,δ(n−w),φ=2kπ,δ(n+w),φ=(2k−1)π, |
and
Aφ=√1−jcotφ2π, φ=π2α. |
Remark 3.1. When α=2k−1, k∈Z, the FCS in (3.1) and the FSS in (3.2) reduce to the classical FCS in (2.5) and the FSS in (2.6), except for certain individual terms.
Definition 3.2. Let x(n),y(n)∈ℓ1(N) and the convolution operation ∗c,α for FRCS is defined as follows
(x∗c,αy)(n)=Tn,φ∞∑m=0˜x(m)[˜y(|n−m|)+˜y(n+m)], | (3.3) |
where
Aφ=√1−jcotφ2π, ˜x(n)=x(n)eMn,φ, ˜y(n)=y(n)eMn,φ,Tn,φ=Aφe−Mn,φ, Mn,φ=jn22cotφ, φ=π2α, α∈R. |
Definition 3.3. Let x(n),y(n)∈ℓ1(N) and the convolution operation ∗s,s,c,α for FRSS is defined as follows
(x∗s,s,c,αy)(n)=Tn,φ∞∑m=0˜x(m)[˜y(|n−m|)−˜y(n+m)]. | (3.4) |
Definition 3.4. Let x(n),y(n)∈ℓ1(N) and the convolution operation ω∗c,s,c,α with the weight function
ω=sin(cscφ⋅w) |
for FRCS is defined as follows
(xω∗c,s,c,αy)(n)=Tn,φ4∞∑m=0˜x(m)[˜y(|n+m−1|)+˜y(|n−m+1|)−˜y(n+m+1)−˜y(|n−m−1|)]. | (3.5) |
Remark 3.2. When α=2k−1, k∈Z, the convolution operations defined in Definitions 3.2 and 3.3 can be simplified to the convolution operations presented in (2.1) and (2.2), respectively. Additionally, the convolution operation described in Definition 3.4 can be reduced to the Fourier weighted convolution operation, except for certain individual terms.
The following convolution theorems for FRCS and FRSS are then derived in detail. Furthermore, the relationship between ω∗c,s,c,α and ∗s,s,c,α is provided.
Theorem 3.1. Let x(n),y(n)∈ℓ1(N), then
(x∗c,αy)(n)∈ℓ1(N). |
Sαcx and Sαcy denote the FRCS for x(n) and y(n). The convolution theorem for FRCS is obtained as follows
Sαc[(x∗c,αy)(n)](w)=(Sαcx)(w)(Sαc¯y)(w), w∈[0,π], | (3.6) |
where
(Sαc¯y)(w)=(Sαcy)(w)e−jw22cotφ. |
Proof. We first prove the existence of the convolution operation (x∗c,αy)(n)
∞∑n=0|(x∗c,αy)(n)|≤|Tn,φ|∞∑n=0∞∑m=0|˜x(m)[˜y(|n−m|)+˜y(n+m)]|≤2|Tn,φ|∞∑m=0|˜x(m)|∞∑n=0|˜y(n)|=2|Tn,φ|‖x‖1⋅‖y‖1; | (3.7) |
therefore,
(x∗c,αy)(n)∈ℓ1(N). |
Next, we prove the convolution Theorem 3.1 and from the Definition 3.1, we have
(Sαcx)(w)(Sαcy)(w)=4∞∑a=0x(a)Kφ(a,w)cos(cscφ⋅wa)⋅∞∑b=0y(b)Kφ(b,w)cos(cscφ⋅wb)=4Nw,φA2φ∞∑a=0∞∑b=0eja2+b22cotφx(a)y(b)⋅cos(cscφ⋅wa)cos(cscφ⋅wb)=2Nw,φA2φ∞∑a=0∞∑b=0eja2+b22cotφx(a)y(b)⋅[cos(cscφ⋅w(a+b))+cos(cscφ⋅w(a−b))]=2Nw,φA2φ[∞∑n=0∞∑m=nejn2+(m−n)22cotφ⋅x(n)y(m−n)cos(cscφ⋅wm)+∞∑n=0∞∑m=0ejn2+(m+n)22cotφ⋅x(n)y(m+n)cos(cscφ⋅wm)+∞∑n=0n∑m=0ejn2+(m−n)22cotφ⋅x(n)y(n−m)cos(cscφ⋅wm)], | (3.8) |
where
Nw,φ=ejw2cotφ. |
One finds
(Sαcx)(w)(Sαcy)(w)=2Nw,φA2φ∞∑n=0x(n)⋅[∞∑m=0ejn2+(m−n)22cotφy(|m−n|)cos(cscφ⋅wm)+∞∑m=0ejn2+(m+n)22cotφy(m+n)cos(cscφ⋅wm)]=2Nw,φA2φ∞∑m=0cos(cscφ⋅wm)⋅{∞∑n=0x(n)[ejn2+(m−n)22cotφy(|m−n|)+ejn2+(m+n)22cotφy(m+n)]}. | (3.9) |
From the Definition 3.2, we have
(Sαcx)(w)(Sαcy)(w)=2ejw22cotφ⋅∞∑m=0[(x∗c,αy)(m)]Kφ(m,w)cos(cscφ⋅wm)=ejk22cotφSαc[(x∗c,αy)(n)](w). | (3.10) |
The proof is completed.
Theorem 3.2. Let x(n),5y(n)∈ℓ1(N), then
(x∗s,s,c,αy)(n)∈ℓ1(N). |
Sαsx, Sαcy denote the FRSS for x(n) and FRCS for y(n), respectively. The convolution theorem for FRSS is satisfied
Sαs[(x∗s,s,c,αy)(n)](w)=(Sαsx)(w)(Sαc¯y)(w), w∈[0,π], | (3.11) |
where
(Sαc¯y)(w)=(Sαcy)(w)e−jw22cotφ. |
Proof. The proof of Theorem 3.2 is similar to that of Theorem 3.1 and it is omitted.
Remark 3.3. When α=2k−1, k∈Z, it is easy to verify that the convolution theorem for the FCS and the FSS in (2.3) and (2.4) are both special cases of Theorems 3.1 and 3.2 in (3.6) and (3.11), respectively.
Theorem 3.3. Let x(n),y(n)∈ℓ1(N), then
(xω∗c,s,c,αy)(n)∈ℓ1(N). |
Sαsx, Sαcy denote the FRSS for x(n) and the FRCS for y(n), respectively, then the convolution theorem with a weight function
ω=sin(cscφ⋅w) |
for FRCS is obtained
Sαc[(xω∗c,s,c,αy)(n)](w)=sin(cscφ⋅w)(Sαsx)(w)(Sαc¯y)(w), w∈[0,π], | (3.12) |
where
(Sαc¯y)(w)=(Sαcy)(w)e−jw22cotφ. |
Proof. The existence of the convolution operation (xω∗c,s,c,αy)(n) is similar to that of Theorem 3.1. Next, we will prove the convolution Theorem 3.3 and based on Definitions 3.1 and 3.4, we have
sin(cscφ⋅k)(Sαsx)(w)(Sαcy)(w)=2sin(cscφ⋅w)∞∑a=0x(a)Kφ(a,w)sin(cscφ⋅wa)⋅∞∑b=0y(b)Kφ(b,w)cos(cscφ⋅wb)=Nw,φA2φ2∞∑a=0∞∑b=0eja2+b22cotφx(a)y(b)⋅{cos[w(cscφ⋅(a+b−1))]−cos[w(cscφ⋅(a+b+1))]+cos[w(cscφ⋅(a−b−1))]−cos[w(cscφ⋅(a−b+1))]}=−Nw,φA2φ2(F1+F2−F3−F4), | (3.13) |
where
F1=∞∑a=0∞∑b=0eja2+b22cotφx(a)y(b)⋅cos[w(cscφ⋅(a+b+1))],F2=∞∑a=0∞∑b=0eja2+b22cotφx(a)y(b)⋅cos[w(cscφ⋅(a−b+1))],F3=∞∑a=0∞∑b=0eja2+b22cotφx(a)y(b)⋅cos[w(cscφ⋅(a−b−1))],F4=∞∑a=0∞∑b=0eja2+b22cotφx(a)y(b)⋅cos[w(cscφ⋅(a+b−1))]. | (3.14) |
Let a=n and a+b+1=m and we obtain
F1=∞∑a=0∞∑b=0eja2+b22cotφx(a)y(b)cos[w(cscφ⋅(a+b+1))]=∞∑n=0∞∑m=n+1ejn2+(m−n−1)22cotφx(n)y(m−n−1)⋅cos(cscφ⋅wm). | (3.15) |
Similar to (3.15), we obtain
F2=∞∑a=0∞∑b=0eja2+b22cotφx(a)y(b)cos[w(cscφ⋅(a−b+1))]=∞∑n=0∞∑m=0ejn2+(m+n+1)22cotφx(n)y(m+n+1)⋅cos(cscφ⋅wm)+∞∑n=0n+1∑m=0ejn2+(n−m+1)22cotφx(n)y(n−m+1)⋅cos(cscφ⋅wm), | (3.16) |
and from (3.15) and (3.16), we can derive
F1+F2=∞∑n=0∞∑m=0ejn2+(m+n+1)22cotφx(n)y(m+n+1)⋅cos(cscφ⋅wm)+∞∑n=0∞∑m=0ejn2+(m−n−1)22cotφ⋅x(n)y(|m−n−1|)cos(cscφ⋅wm). | (3.17) |
In a manner similar to (3.15)–(3.17), we have
F3+F4=∞∑n=0∞∑m=0ejn2+(m+n−1)22cotφx(n)y(|m+n−1|)⋅cos(cscφ⋅wm)+∞∑n=0∞∑m=0ejn2+(m−n+1)22cotφ⋅x(n)y(|m−n+1|)cos(cscφ⋅wm), | (3.18) |
and by (3.17) and (3.18), we can achieve
sin(cscφ⋅w)(Sαsx)(w)(Sαcy)(w)=Nw,φA2φ2(F3+F4−F1−F2)=2ejw22cotφ∞∑m=0(xω∗c,s,c,αy)(m)Kφ(m,w)cos(cscφ⋅wm)=ejw22cotφSαc[(xω∗c,s,c,αy)(m)](w). | (3.19) |
The proof is completed.
In this subsection, the convolution relation of ω∗c,s,c,α and ∗s,s,c,α will be presented as follows.
Theorem 4.1. Let x(n),y(n)∈ℓ1(N), and the convolution relation between ω∗c,s,c,α and ∗s,s,c,α satisfies the following equation
(xω∗c,s,c,αy)(n)=14(x∗s,s,c,αy)(n+1)−14(x∗s,s,c,αy)(n−1). | (4.1) |
Proof. From Definition 3.4, we have
(xω∗c,s,c,αy)(n)=AφeMn,φ4∞∑m=0˜x(m)[˜y(|n−m+1|)−˜y(n+m+1)]+AφeMn,φ4∞∑m=0˜x(m)[˜y(|n+m−1|)−˜y(|n−m−1|)], | (4.2) |
and from Definition 3.3 and (4.2), we obtain
AφeMn,φ4∞∑m=0˜x(m)[˜y(|n−m+1|)−˜y(n+m+1)]=14(x∗s,s,c,αy)(n+1). | (4.3) |
Similarly to (4.3), we can achieve the following result
AφeMn,φ4∞∑m=0˜x(m)[˜y(|n+m−1|)−˜y(|n−m−1|)]=−AφeMn,φ4∞∑m=0˜x(m)[˜y(|n−1−m|)−˜y(n−1+m)]=−14(x∗s,s,c,αy)(n−1). | (4.4) |
From (4.3) and (4.4), we can obtain
(xω∗c,s,c,αy)(n)=14(x∗s,s,c,αy)(n+1)−14(x∗s,s,c,αy)(n−1). | (4.5) |
The proof is completed.
Based on Figure 1, it can be observed that the weighted convolution operation ω∗c,s,c,α defined in Definition 3.4 can be equivalently represented by the convolution operation ∗s,s,c,α introduced in Definition 3.3.
The convolution equation is a crucial tool in various applications, including radiation energy transfer, film or shaft vibration problems, as well as the resolution of electrostatic field and magnetic field synthesis along with digital signal processing. The system of convolution equations represented by (5.1) and (5.2) also arises when addressing challenges in engineering mechanics and digital signal processing; thus, making it an active area of research interest. In this section, we will discuss two specific types of convolution equations
{x(n)+μ1∞∑m=0˜η(m)y11(n,m)=p(n),y(n)+μ2∞∑m=0˜x(m)ψ21(n,m)=q(n) | (5.1) |
and
z(n)+μ[∞∑m=0˜η(m)z12(n,m)+∞∑m=0˜ψ(m)z21(n,m)]=p(n), | (5.2) |
where
y11(n,m)=Aφejn22cotφ[y(|m−n|)−y(m+n)],z12(n,m)=Aφejn22cotφ[z(|m−n|)+z(m+n)],z21(n,m)=Aφejn22cotφ[z(|m−n+1|)+z(|m+n−1|)−z(|m−n−1|)−z(m+n+1)],ψ21(n,m)=Aφejn22cotφ[ψ(|m−n+1|)+ψ(|m+n−1|)−ψ(|m−n−1|)−ψ(m+n+1)] | (5.3) |
and
η(m)=(η1∗c,αη2)(m), ψ(m)=(ψ1∗s,s,c,αψ2)(m),˜x(m)=Aφejm22cotφx(m), ˜η(m)=Aφejm22cotφη(m), ˜ψ(m)=Aφejm22cotφψ(m). | (5.4) |
where μ, μ1, μ2∈C, ˜η, η, η1, η2, ˜ψ, ψ, ψ1, ψ2, p,q∈ℓ1(N), x, y and z are unknown sequences in ℓ1(N), m,n∈N.
Next, we will utilize the convolution operation along with the corresponding convolution theorem proposed in this article to investigate the solution of the convolution equation. First, we will examine a system of convolution Eq (5.1).
Theorem 5.1. Let x,y∈ℓ1(N), such that
1−μ1μ2e−jw22cotφSαc(ηω∗c,s,c,αψ)(w)≠0, |
then the system of convolutions Eq (5.1) has a unique solution
x(n)=p(n)+(p∗s,s,c,αu)(n)−μ1(η∗s,s,c,αq)(n)−μ1(η∗s,s,c,αq)∗s,s,c,αu)(n) | (5.5) |
and
y(n)=q(n)+(q∗c,αu)(n)−μ2(pω∗c,s,c,αψ)(n)−μ2((pω∗c,s,c,αψ)∗c,αu)(n), | (5.6) |
where u∈ℓ1(N), and the following equality holds
(Sαcu)(w)=μ1μ2Sαc(ηω∗c,s,c,αψ)(w)1−μ1μ2e−jw22cotφSαc(ηω∗c,s,c,αψ)(w). | (5.7) |
Proof. By applying the FRSS and FRCS to both sides of Eq (5.1) and simultaneously utilizing (5.3), we can obtain
{(Sαsx)(w)+μ1e−jw22cotφ(Sαsη)(w)(Sαcy)(w)=(Sαsp)(w),μ2e−jw22cotφsin(cscφ⋅w)(Sαsx)(w)(Sαcψ)(w)+(Sαcy)(w)=(Sαcq)(w) | (5.8) |
from
1−μ1μ2e−jw22cotφSαc(ηω∗c,s,c,αψ)(w)≠0. |
By applying the Wiener-Levi's theorem [34] and (5.7), we can deduce
(Sαsx)(w)=(Sαsp)(w)−μ1Sαs(η∗s,s,c,αq)(w)1−μ1μ2e−jw22cotφSαc(ηω∗c,s,c,αψ)(w)=((Sαsp)(w)−μ1Sαs(η∗s,s,c,αq)(w))⋅(1+e−jw22cotφSαc(u)(w))=(Sαsp)(w)+Sαs(p∗s,s,c,αu)(w)−μ1Sαs(η∗s,s,c,αq)(w)−μ1Sαs((η∗s,s,c,αq)∗s,s,c,αu)(w). | (5.9) |
Hence, we have
x(n)=p(n)+(p∗s,s,c,αu)(n)−μ1(η∗s,s,c,αq)(n)−μ1((η∗s,s,c,αq)∗s,s,c,αu)(n). | (5.10) |
Similarly, we have
(Sαcy)(w)=(Sαcq)(w)−μ2Sαc(pω∗c,s,c,αψ)(w)1−μ1μ2e−jw22cotφSαc(ηω∗c,s,c,αψ)(w)=((Sαcq)(w)−μ2Sαc(pω∗c,s,c,αψ)(w))⋅(1+e−jw22cotφSαc(u)(w))=(Sαcq)(w)+Sαc(q∗c,αu)(w)−μ2Sαc(pω∗c,s,c,αψ)(w)−μ2Sαc((pω∗c,s,c,αψ)∗c,αu)(w); | (5.11) |
therefore, we can achieve
y(n)=q(n)+(q∗c,αu)(n)−μ2(pω∗c,s,c,αψ)(n)−μ2((pω∗c,s,c,αψ)∗c,αu)(n). | (5.12) |
The proof is completed.
The solution to Eq (5.2) will be discussed below.
Theorem 5.2. Let y∈ℓ1(N), such that
1+μe−jw22cotφ(Sαc(η1∗c,αη2)(w)+(Sαc(ψ1ω∗c,s,c,αψ2)(w))≠0, |
then Eq (5.2) has a unique solution
z(n)=p(n)−(p∗c,αv)(n) | (5.13) |
and the following equality holds
(Sαcv)(w)=μ(Sαc(η1∗c,αη2)(w)+Sαc(ψ1ω∗c,s,c,αψ2)(w))1+μe−jw22cotφ(Sαc(η1∗c,αη2)(w)+Sαc(ψ1ω∗c,s,c,αψ2)(w)). | (5.14) |
Proof. Applying the FRCS to both sides of Eq (5.2), we have
(Sαcz)(w)(1+μe−jw22cotφ(Sαc(η1∗c,αη2)(w)+Sαc(ψ1ω∗c,s,c,αψ2)(w)))=(Sαcp)(w). | (5.15) |
Owing to the Wiener-Levi's theorem [34], from (5.4) and (5.14), we can derive
(Sαcz)(w)=(Sαcp)(w)⋅(1−e−jw22cotφ(Sαcv)(w)), | (5.16) |
hence, we have
(Sαcz)(w)=(Sαcp)(w)−Sαc(p∗c,αv)(w). | (5.17) |
The proof of Theorem 5.2 is completed.
The solution of Eq (5.2) is also depicted in Figure 3, where the fractional order is α=1.26, p(n)=sinn and v(n)=n3.
Next, let us analyze the computational complexity of the solution achieved in convolution integral Eqs (5.1) and (5.2) in detail. From (5.5), using the fast Fourier transform (FFT), (p∗s,s,c,αu)(n), (η∗s,s,c,αq)(n) and (η∗s,s,c,αq)∗s,s,c,αu)(n) require 32NlogN2, 32NlogN2 and 2NlogN2 real number multiplications, respectively, for a discrete signal of size N. Therefore, the computational complexity of a solution x(n) to Eq (5.1) can be obtained as O(152NlogN2), which is much lower than that of the computational complexity in fractional domain. Similarly, we can obtain the computational complexity of a solution y(n) to Eq (5.1) and a solution z(n) to Eq (5.2) as O(152NlogN2) and O(52NlogN2), respectively.
The FRCS and the FRSS, which are valuable tools in mathematics and signal processing, were introduced in this paper. Convolution operations for FRCS and FRSS were proposed, along with a detailed derivation of their corresponding convolution theorems. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that our derived results encompassed all classical findings regarding Fourier cosine and sine series as special cases. As an application, explicit solutions for two classes of convolution equations in the FRCS and FRSS domains were explored. Additionally, the computational complexity of solving these equations was also analyzed in detail.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (62261055 and 61861044); The Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province (2023-JC-YB-085 and 2022JM-400).
The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest.
[1] |
I. E. Lager, M. Štumpf, G. A. E. Vandenbosch, G. Antonini, Evaluation of convolution integrals at late-times revisited, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 70 (2022), 9953–9958. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2022.3168347 doi: 10.1109/TAP.2022.3168347
![]() |
[2] |
L. Liu, J. J. Ma, Collocation boundary value methods for auto-convolution Volterra integral equations, Appl. Numer. Math., 177 (2022), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnum.2022.03.004 doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2022.03.004
![]() |
[3] |
Y. Xiang, S. Yuan, Q. Feng, Fractional Fourier cosine and sine Laplace weighted convolution and its application, IET Signal Process., 17 (2023), 12170. https://doi.org/10.1049/sil2.12170 doi: 10.1049/sil2.12170
![]() |
[4] |
M. L. Maslakov, New approach to the iterative method for numerical solution of a convolution type equation determined for a certain class of problems, Comput. Math. Math. Phys., 61 (2021), 1260–1268. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965542521080054 doi: 10.1134/S0965542521080054
![]() |
[5] | M. S. Gao, J. Yu, Z. F. Yang, J. B. Zhao, Physics embedded graph convolution neural network for power flow calculation considering uncertain injections and topology, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst., 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2023.3287028 |
[6] |
Ö. Civalek, Numerical analysis of free vibrations of laminated composite conical and cylindrical shells: discrete singular convolution (DSC) approach, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 205 (2007), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2006.05.001 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2006.05.001
![]() |
[7] |
J. González-Camus, C. Lizama, P. J. Miana, Fundamental solutions for semidiscrete evolution equations via Banach algebras, Adv. Differ, Equations, 2021 (2021), 378–410. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03206-7 doi: 10.1186/s13662-020-03206-7
![]() |
[8] |
Y. Y. Mei, Q. Feng, X. X. Gao, Y. B. Zhao, Convolution theorem associated with the QWFRFT, Chin. J. Electron., 32 (2023), 485–492. https://doi.org/10.23919/cje.2021.00.225 doi: 10.23919/cje.2021.00.225
![]() |
[9] | S. B. Yakubovich, Y. F. Luchko, The hypergeometric approach to integral transforms and convolutions, Springer Science & Business Media, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1196-6 |
[10] |
M. Kumar, T. K. Rawat, Design of fractional order differentiator using type-III and type-IV discrete cosine transform, Eng. Sci. Technol., 20 (2017), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2016.07.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jestch.2016.07.002
![]() |
[11] |
Q. Feng, B. Z. Li, Convolution theorem for fractional cosine-sine transform and its application, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 40 (2017), 3651–3665. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.4251 doi: 10.1002/mma.4251
![]() |
[12] |
V. Guleria, S. Sabir, D. C. Mishra, Security of multiple RGB images by RSA cryptosystem combined with FrDCT and Arnold transform, J. Inf. Secur. Appl., 54 (2020), 102524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2020.102524 doi: 10.1016/j.jisa.2020.102524
![]() |
[13] |
Y. Ding, Z. L. Zhang, X. F. Zhao, D. Hong, W. Li, W. Cai, et al., AF2GNN: graph convolution with adaptive filters and aggregator fusion for hyperspectral image classification, Inf. Sci., 602 (2022), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.04.006 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.04.006
![]() |
[14] |
Q. Feng, R. B. Wang, Fractional convolution, correlation theorem and its application in filter design, Signal Image Video Process., 14 (2020), 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-019-01563-9 doi: 10.1007/s11760-019-01563-9
![]() |
[15] |
V. F. García, J. M. Delgado, C. Rodríguez, Exact analytical solution of the convolution integral equation for a general profile fitting function and Gaussian detector kernel, Phys. Med. Biol., 45 (2000), 645–650. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/45/3/306 doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/3/306
![]() |
[16] |
K. Trimeche, Hypoelliptic Dunkl convolution equations in the space of distributions on Rd, J. Fourier Anal. Appl., 12 (2006), 517–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00041-005-5073-y doi: 10.1007/s00041-005-5073-y
![]() |
[17] |
X. X. Gao, Q. Feng, Y. Y. Mei, Discrete convolution associated with fractional cosine and sine series, J. Beijing Inst. Technol., 30 (2021), 305–310. https://doi.org/10.15918/j.jbit1004-0579.2021.040 doi: 10.15918/j.jbit1004-0579.2021.040
![]() |
[18] |
Q. Feng, R. B. Wang, Fractional convolution associated with a class of integral equations, IET Signal Process., 14 (2020), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-spr.2019.0140 doi: 10.1049/iet-spr.2019.0140
![]() |
[19] |
Z. W. Li, W. B. Gao, B. Z. Li, The solvability of a class of convolution equations associated with 2D FRFT, Mathematics, 8 (2020), 1928. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8111928 doi: 10.3390/math8111928
![]() |
[20] |
D. Oliveira e Silva, R. Quilodran, Smoothness of solutions of a convolution equation of restricted-type on the sphere, Forum Math. Sigma, 9 (2021), e12. https://doi.org/10.1017/fms.2021.7 doi: 10.1017/fms.2021.7
![]() |
[21] |
P. R. Li, Existence of solutions for dual singular integral equations with convolution kernels in case of non-normal type, J. Appl. Anal. Comput., 10 (2020), 2756–2766. https://doi.org/10.11948/20200192 doi: 10.11948/20200192
![]() |
[22] |
L. P. Castro, R. C. Guerra, N. M. Tuan, New convolutions and their applicability to integral equations of Wiener-Hopf plus Hankel type, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 43 (2020), 4835–4846. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.6236 doi: 10.1002/mma.6236
![]() |
[23] |
Q. Feng, S. Yuan, The explicit solutions for a class of fractional Fourier-Laplace convolution equations, Integral Transforms Spec. Funct., 34 (2023), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10652469.2022.2093870 doi: 10.1080/10652469.2022.2093870
![]() |
[24] |
P. R. Li, G. B. Ren, Solvability of singular integro-differential equations via Riemann-Hilbert problem, J. Differ. Equations, 265 (2018), 5455–5471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2018.07.056 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2018.07.056
![]() |
[25] |
Z. R. Wang, B. Shiri, D. Baleanu, Discrete fractional watermark technique, Front. Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng., 21 (2020), 880–883. https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.2000133 doi: 10.1631/FITEE.2000133
![]() |
[26] |
H. M. Srivastava, W. Z. Lone, F. A. Shah, A. I. Zayed, Discrete quadratic-phase Fourier transform: theory and convolution structures, Entropy, 24 (2022), 1340. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24101340 doi: 10.3390/e24101340
![]() |
[27] |
G. Monegato, On a time discrete convolution-space collocation BEM for the numerical solution of two-dimensional wave propagation problems in unbounded domains, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 43 (2023), 3766–3795. https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/drac068 doi: 10.1093/imanum/drac068
![]() |
[28] |
H. Tung, N. X. Thao, V. K. Tuan, The h-Fourier sine-Laplace discrete generalized convolution on time scale, Integral Transforms Spec. Funct., 34 (2022), 444–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/10652469.2022.2142788 doi: 10.1080/10652469.2022.2142788
![]() |
[29] |
N. X. Thao, V. K. Tuan, N. A. Dai, Discrete-time Fourier cosine convolution, Integral Transforms Spec. Funct., 29 (2018), 866–874. https://doi.org/10.1080/10652469.2018.1510924 doi: 10.1080/10652469.2018.1510924
![]() |
[30] |
N. X. Thao, V. K. Tuan, N. A. Dai, A discrete convolution involving Fourier sine and cosine series and its applications, Integral Transforms Spec. Funct., 31 (2020), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/10652469.2019.1687467 doi: 10.1080/10652469.2019.1687467
![]() |
[31] |
T. Chen, Fractional-order accumulative generation with discrete convolution transformation, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7050402 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7050402
![]() |
[32] |
C. Y. Ma, B. Shiria, G. C. Wu, D. Baleanuc, New fractional signal smoothing equations with short memory and variable order, Optik, 218 (2020), 164507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164507 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164507
![]() |
[33] |
J. A. D. Appleby, E. Lawless, Solution space characterisation of perturbed linear Volterra integrodifferential convolution equations: the LP case, Appl. Math. Lett., 146 (2023), 108825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2023.108825 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2023.108825
![]() |
[34] | H. Hochstadt, Integral equations, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1973. Avaible from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781118165942.fmatter. |
1. | Chaoyang Zhu, Mawaheb Al-Dossari, S. Rezapour, B. Gunay, On the exact soliton solutions and different wave structures to the (2+1) dimensional Chaffee–Infante equation, 2024, 57, 22113797, 107431, 10.1016/j.rinp.2024.107431 | |
2. | B. Reddappa, R. Geetha, B. Rushi Kumar, Mehdi Akermi, M. Ijaz Khan, Ilyas Khan, Nonlinear coupled ODEs for nanofluid flow and heat transfer with varying thickness: A comparative study, 2024, 1040-7790, 1, 10.1080/10407790.2024.2333013 | |
3. | Handenur Esen, Aydin Secer, Mir Sajjad Hashemi, Muslum Ozisik, Mustafa Bayram, Examining the (1 + 1)-dimensional Schrödinger–Hirota equation with Kerr effect under inter-modal dispersion using the invariance theory, 2024, 56, 1572-817X, 10.1007/s11082-024-06813-w | |
4. | Rongbo Wang, Qiang Feng, Weighted Convolution for Quaternion Linear Canonical Cosine Transform and Its Application, 2024, 13, 2075-1680, 402, 10.3390/axioms13060402 | |
5. | Saima Noor, Wedad Albalawi, Rasool Shah, Ahmad Shafee, Sherif M. E. Ismaeel, S. A. El-Tantawy, A comparative analytical investigation for some linear and nonlinear time-fractional partial differential equations in the framework of the Aboodh transformation, 2024, 12, 2296-424X, 10.3389/fphy.2024.1374049 | |
6. | Saima Noor, Wedad Albalawi, Rasool Shah, M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Sherif M. E. Ismaeel, S. A. El-Tantawy, On the approximations to fractional nonlinear damped Burger’s-type equations that arise in fluids and plasmas using Aboodh residual power series and Aboodh transform iteration methods, 2024, 12, 2296-424X, 10.3389/fphy.2024.1374481 | |
7. | Yingnan Qi, Jalil Manafian, Kamal Mahir Sulieman, Anjan Kumar, Neha Kumari, Rohit Sharma, Mehdi Fazli, Tarek Awad, Multi wave solutions and wave propagation in plasma physics over the Gilson-Pickering equation by modified extended tanh-function method, 2024, 56, 1572-817X, 10.1007/s11082-024-06928-0 | |
8. | Shanyuan Qin, Jidong Yang, Ning Qin, Jianping Huang, Kun Tian, Quasi-P-Wave Reverse Time Migration in TTI Media with a Generalized Fractional Convolution Stencil, 2024, 8, 2504-3110, 174, 10.3390/fractalfract8030174 | |
9. | Jianwen Cheng, Jalil Manafian, Gurpreet Singh, Anupam Yadav, Neha Kumari, Rohit Sharma, Baharak Eslami, Naief Alabed Alkader, Interaction between soliton and periodic solutions and the stability analysis to the Gilson–Pickering equation by bilinear method and $$\exp (-\theta (\alpha ))$$-function approach arising plasma physics, 2024, 56, 1572-817X, 10.1007/s11082-024-06805-w | |
10. | Saima Noor, Wedad Albalawi, Rasool Shah, M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Sherif M. E. Ismaeel, Mathematical frameworks for investigating fractional nonlinear coupled Korteweg-de Vries and Burger’s equations, 2024, 12, 2296-424X, 10.3389/fphy.2024.1374452 | |
11. | Lan Lan, Jalil Manafian, Baharak Eslami, A. H. A. Hussein, K. H. Mahmoud, A. S. A. Alsubaie, Anmar Ghanim Taki, Afandiyeva Hajar, Homoclinic and N-soliton solutions to variable-coefficient KP equation arising two-temperature ions in dusty plasma, 2024, 56, 1572-817X, 10.1007/s11082-024-07041-y | |
12. | A. Kilina, P. Panteleeva, N. Stankevich, Multi-dimensional chaos initiated by short pulses in non-autonomous radio-physical generator, 2024, 135, 10075704, 108041, 10.1016/j.cnsns.2024.108041 | |
13. | Ahmed M. Elsherbeny, Nivan M. Elsonbaty, Niveen M. Badra, Hamdy M. Ahmed, Mohammad Mirzazadeh, M. Eslami, M. S. Hashemi, Mustafa Bayram, Optical solitons of higher order mathematical model with refractive index using Kudryashov method, 2024, 56, 1572-817X, 10.1007/s11082-024-06846-1 | |
14. | M.S. Hashemi, A variable coefficient third degree generalized Abel equation method for solving stochastic Schrödinger–Hirota model, 2024, 180, 09600779, 114606, 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.114606 | |
15. | Naveed Iqbal, Shah Hussain, Muhammad Nazim Tufail, Wael W Mohammed, Solving the fractional Fornberg-Whitham equation within Caputo framework using the optimal auxiliary function method, 2024, 99, 0031-8949, 055234, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad3488 | |
16. | Wafaa B. Rabie, Hamdy M. Ahmed, Mir Sajjad Hashemi, Mohammad Mirzazadeh, Mustafa Bayram, Generating optical solitons in the extended (3 + 1)-dimensional nonlinear Kudryashov’s equation using the extended F-expansion method, 2024, 56, 1572-817X, 10.1007/s11082-024-06787-9 | |
17. | Shanwen Ke, S. Shateyi, Salman A. AlQahtani, Nouf F. AlQahtani, Discovering diverse soliton solutions in the modified Schrödinger’s equation via innovative approaches, 2024, 57, 22113797, 107420, 10.1016/j.rinp.2024.107420 | |
18. | Nan Jiang, Qiang Feng, Xi Yang, Jin-Rong He, Bing-Zhao Li, The octonion linear canonical transform: Properties and applications, 2025, 192, 09600779, 116039, 10.1016/j.chaos.2025.116039 |