Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article

Yamabe constant evolution and monotonicity along the conformal Ricci flow

  • Received: 12 December 2021 Revised: 06 April 2022 Accepted: 07 April 2022 Published: 21 April 2022
  • MSC : 53C18, 53C21, 58J35, 53E10, 53E20

  • We investigate the Yamabe constant's behaviour in a conformal Ricci flow. For conformal Ricci flow metric g(t), t[0,T), the time evolution formula for the Yamabe constant Y(g(t)) is derived. It is demonstrated that if the beginning metric g(0)=g0 is Yamabe metric, then the Yamabe constant is monotonically growing along the conformal Ricci flow under some simple assumptions unless g0 is Einstein. As a result, this study adds to the body of knowledge about the Yamabe problem.

    Citation: Yanlin Li, Abimbola Abolarinwa, Shahroud Azami, Akram Ali. Yamabe constant evolution and monotonicity along the conformal Ricci flow[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 12077-12090. doi: 10.3934/math.2022671

    Related Papers:

    [1] Yayun Chen, Tongzhu Li . Classification of spacelike conformal Einstein hypersurfaces in Lorentzian space Rn+11. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 23247-23271. doi: 10.3934/math.20231182
    [2] Xiaoling Zhang, Cuiling Ma, Lili Zhao . On some m-th root metrics. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 23971-23978. doi: 10.3934/math.20241165
    [3] Mohd Danish Siddiqi, Fatemah Mofarreh . Schur-type inequality for solitonic hypersurfaces in (k,μ)-contact metric manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 36069-36081. doi: 10.3934/math.20241711
    [4] Abdul Haseeb, Fatemah Mofarreh, Sudhakar Kumar Chaubey, Rajendra Prasad . A study of -Ricci–Yamabe solitons on LP-Kenmotsu manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 22532-22546. doi: 10.3934/math.20241096
    [5] Yanlin Li, Yuquan Xie, Manish Kumar Gupta, Suman Sharma . On projective Ricci curvature of cubic metrics. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(5): 11305-11315. doi: 10.3934/math.2025513
    [6] Yanlin Li, Dipen Ganguly, Santu Dey, Arindam Bhattacharyya . Conformal η-Ricci solitons within the framework of indefinite Kenmotsu manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 5408-5430. doi: 10.3934/math.2022300
    [7] Sharief Deshmukh, Mohammed Guediri . Some new characterizations of spheres and Euclidean spaces using conformal vector fields. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 28765-28777. doi: 10.3934/math.20241395
    [8] Yanlin Li, Aydin Gezer, Erkan Karakaş . Some notes on the tangent bundle with a Ricci quarter-symmetric metric connection. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 17335-17353. doi: 10.3934/math.2023886
    [9] Shahroud Azami, Mehdi Jafari, Nargis Jamal, Abdul Haseeb . Hyperbolic Ricci solitons on perfect fluid spacetimes. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 18929-18943. doi: 10.3934/math.2024921
    [10] Mohd. Danish Siddiqi, Fatemah Mofarreh . Hyperbolic Ricci soliton and gradient hyperbolic Ricci soliton on relativistic prefect fluid spacetime. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 21628-21640. doi: 10.3934/math.20241051
  • We investigate the Yamabe constant's behaviour in a conformal Ricci flow. For conformal Ricci flow metric g(t), t[0,T), the time evolution formula for the Yamabe constant Y(g(t)) is derived. It is demonstrated that if the beginning metric g(0)=g0 is Yamabe metric, then the Yamabe constant is monotonically growing along the conformal Ricci flow under some simple assumptions unless g0 is Einstein. As a result, this study adds to the body of knowledge about the Yamabe problem.



    Intrinsic geometric flows such as the Ricci flow, Yamabe flow and their various extensions have been widely studied in the recent time owing to their numerous applications in topology, geometry and physics. The present paper is concerned with a conformally modified Ricci flow introduced by Arthur Fischer in [10] and codenamed conformal Ricci flow as a result of the role played by conformal geometry in the derivation of its equations. Precisely, let (Mn,g0) be a smooth n-dimensional (n3) closed connected manifold together with Riemannian metric g0 of constant scalar curvature R0. The conformal Ricci flow is defined by a one-parameter family of metric g(t) satisfying the following quasilinear parabolic system

    {g(t)t=2(Ric(t)R0ng(t))2p(t)g(t),    (x,t)M×(0,T),Rg(t)=R0, (x,t)M×[0,T), (1.1)

    together with the initial condition g(0)=g0 and a family of function p(t), t[0,T), where Rg(t) is the scalar curvature of the evolving metric g(t). The equation

    Rg(t)=R0

    appearing in the above system is known as the constraint equation. Thus, the flow is known to preserve constant scalar curvature of the evolving metric. Indeed, this accounts for naming the function, p=p(t), conformal pressure, since it serves as time-dependent Lagrange multiplier and makes the term pg acting as the constraint force neccessary to preserve the scalar curvature constraint.

    Consequently, p(t) is known to solve a time-dependent elliptic partial differential equation as g(t) evolves. This scenario is completely similar to the case of incompressible Euler or Navier-Stokes equations of fluid dynamics, where the divergence free constraint of the vector field is preserved by the real physical pressure which acts as the Langrage multiplier. However, it can then be clearly shown that (1.1) is equivalently the same as the following system of parabolic-elliptic equations

    {gt+2(RicR0ng)=2pg,   in  M×(0,T),(n1)Δp+R0p=|RicR0ng|2in  M×[0,T), (1.2)

    with initial condition g(0)=g0. Considering the role of the conformal pressure, the function p(t) is expected to be zero at an equilibrium point and strictly positive otherwise. Hence, the equilibrium points of the conformal Ricci flow are characterised by Einstein metric, and the term (RicR0ng) can then be regarded as a measure of deviation from an equilibrium point.

    Since the volume of a Riemannian manifold (Mn,g) is a positive real number and the scalar curvature is a real-valued function on Mn, the constraint on Rg(t) is considerably more drastic than the volume constraint of the Hamilton Ricci flow. Thus, the configuration space of the conformal Ricci flow equations is considerably smaller than that of the Hamilton Ricci flow. Obviously, conformal Ricci flow will perform better in searching for certain geometric features since working on a smaller configuration space is more advantageous than working on a larger configuration. More feasible similarities and differences between conformal Ricci flow and Hamilton Ricci flow, as well as some possible applications of conformal Ricci flow to 3-manifold geometry are highlighted in [10].

    Arthur Fischer has since 2004 established the short-time existence and uniqueness of the conformal Ricci flow on closed manifolds with negative constant scalar curvature R0<0 in [10]. He also observed that Yamabe constant is strictly increasing along the flow on negative Yamabe type closed manifolds. A decade later, Lu, Qing and Zheng [16] extended Fischer's results to the case of conformal Ricci flow on manifolds with nonnegative constant scalar curvature. They applied De-Turck's trick to recover the existence of the flow equation as a strong parabolic-elliptic partial differential equation on closed manifolds as well as on asymptotically flat manifolds. They also proved that Yamabe constant is monotonically increasing along conformal Ricci flow on closed manifolds of nonnegative constant scalar curvature.

    Theorem A. (Lu, Qing and Zheng [16]) Assume that the elliptic operator (n1)Δ+R0 is invertible. Then there exists a number 0<T0T< such that the conformal Ricci flow g(t) exists for t[0,T] with g(0)=g0.

    Theorem B. (Lu, Qing and Zheng [16]) Assume that g0[g0] is the only Yamabe metric in the conformal class with Rg0=R0 and that (n1)Δ+R0 is invertible. Then there exists 0<T0T< such that the metric, t[0,T0) is a Yamabe metric and the Yamabe constant Y[g(t)] is monotonically increasing for t[0,T0) unless g0 is Einstein.

    Motivated by the results of Fischer [10] and Lu, Qing and Zheng [16] and the tremendous advantages of working on smaller configuration as we have in the case of conformal Ricci flow, this paper is aimed at deriving evolution equation for subcritical Yamabe constant along the conformal Ricci flow on an n-dimensional (n3) closed connected oriented Riemannian manifolds of positive constant scalar curvature. It turns out that evolution equation at the critical point characterises the monotonicity property of the Yamabe constant which is strict unless on the Einstein metric. Note that monotonicities of Yamabe constant proved in [10,16] are not consequences of evolution equation. Evolution of subcritical Yamabe constant was studied by Chang and Lu [8] along the Hamilton Ricci flow under some technical assumptions. The results were extended to relative subcritical Yamabe constant by [5] under the Ricci flow with boundary when the mean curvature of the boundary vanishes. Various extensions of Chang-Lu's evolution formula are mentioned here for completeness: for instance, see [9] along List extended flow, [3,11] along Ricci-Burguignon flow and [7] for Cotton tensor flow. Although, our results are procedurally similar to those mentioned above, they are different in the sense that conformal Ricci flow is complementary to the classical Ricci flow and has smaller configuration, whereas, other flows mentioned above are just various extensions of Ricci flow.

    The organisation of this paper is as follows: Section 2 gives some basics and preliminary results on the Yamabe constant viz-a-viz Yamabe problem and evolution equations along the conformal Ricci flow. Section 3 is devoted to the main results and their applications, while some examples are constructed in the last section.

    In 1960, H. Yamabe [27] asked a question, which is now one of the most famous problem in modern differential geometry. Let (Mn,g) be an n-dimensional (n3) closed Riemannian manifold, does there exists a metric ˜g conformal to g which has a constant scalar curvature? Aubin [2], Schoen [24] and Trudinger [25] have solved the problem giving affirmative answer to the question. They proved that an infimum of the normalised Einstein-Hilbert functional is attained in each conformal class of metrics and the infimum is achieved by a metric of constant scalar curvature. Let [g] denote the conformal class of g, consisting of smooth metrics on M pointwise conformal to g and Mg, the set of Riemannian metrics on M. Recall that the normalised Einstein-Hilbert functional E:MgR is given by

    E(˜g)=MR˜gdμ˜gVol(M,˜g)n2n, (2.1)

    where E(˜g) is restricted to the class of conformal metric ˜g[g]. Here Rg, dμg and Vol(M,g) are the scalar curvature, the volume form of metric g and the volume of (M,g), respectively. The quantity E(g) is well known in literature as Yamabe quotient.

    Yamabe problem can be recast in terms of positive solutions of the following nonlinear critical elliptic differential equation

    {Lgu=αuqcrit, Muqcrit+1dμg=1, (2.2)

    where α is a constant, qcrit=n+2n2, Lg:=aΔg+Rg with a:=4(n1)(n2) is the conformal Laplacian (Δg is Beltrami Laplacian). It happens that the exponent qcrit=n+2n2 in (2.2) is precisely the critical value, below (subcritical) which the equation is easy to solve and above (supercritical) which may be delicate. The existence of solution to (2.2) follows from direct method in the calculus of variation (cf. [15]). It is also observed that Eq (2.2) is the Euler-Lagrange equation for a minimiser u of the functional

    Y(g;u)=M(a|u|2+Rgu2)dμ(Mu2nn2dμ)n2n, (2.3)

    where is the Riemannian connection on M. A function u for which Y(g;u) get its infimum is called the Yamabe minimiser, while u4n2g is called the Yamabe metric and has constant scalar curvature. Thus, for a positive function u satisfying ˜g=u4n2g, we have infimum in (2.1) and (2.3) being equal, that is,

    Y(g)=inf0<uC(M)Y(g;u)=inf˜g[g]E(˜g). (2.4)

    Then the infimum in (2.4) is the Yamabe constant of a smooth metric g on closed n-dimensional manifold. For convinience, we assume all metrics have unit volume. The following definition are in order,

    Definition 2.1.

    (1) Yamabe constant Y(g) is the infimum of Yamabe quotient.

    (2) A Riemannian metric g is said to be Yamabe metric if and only if g is the minimising metric for Yamabe functional.

    (3) A Riemannian metric g is said to be Einstein metric if and only if its Ricci curvature is a multiple of g, i.e., Ricαg=0, 0αR. That is, g is the minimising metric.

    As in the case of other geometric flows, the evolutions of geometric quantities under conformal Ricci flow allow for better understanding of the flow. Following standard techniques (cf. [4,10,16]) one can compute directly as follows: Consider nonconstraint conformal Ricci flow equation

    gt+2(RicR0ng)=2pg

    on closed Riemannian mnaiofld. Then we have

    gijt=2(RicijR0ngij)+2pgij

    for inverse metric gij(t),

    tRg(t)=ΔgRg(t)+2R0n(Rg(t)R0)+2p(Rg(t)R0)+2[(n1)Δg+R0]p+2|RicR0ng|2

    for the scalar curvature Rg(t) of g(t), and

    tdμg(t)=npdμg(t)

    for the volume form dμg(t) of (M,g(t)). Heuristically, since Rg(t)=R0(constant) one can recover the function p(t) once the operator (n1)Δg+R0 is invertible, that is,

    p(t)=[(n1)Δg+R0]1(|RicR0ng|2).

    Similarly, one can compute evolution of |u|2g and Δgu as presented in the following Lemma.

    Lemma 2.2. Let g(t), t[0,T) be the conformal Ricci flow. Let uC(M) be a smooth function on (M,g(t)). Then we have the following evolutions:

    t|u|2g=2(RicijR0ngij)iuju+2p|u|2g+2iuiut, (2.5)
    t(Δgu)=2(RicijR0ngij)iju+2pΔgu+Δgut, (2.6)

    where ut=ut.

    The proof of the above lemma is omitted since the computations follow from standard technique under geometric flow (see [3,4]).

    Now, we define Yamabe invariant via the normalised Einstein Hilbert functional. Let g[g] conformal class of metric g and the average total scalar curvature is defined by the quantity AV(Rg):=Vol(M,g)1MRgdμg. Then

    E(g)=Vol(M,g)2nAV(Rg),

    is saying that Yamabe invariant is a volume-normalised total scalar curvature.

    Lemma 2.3. Let g(t), t[0,T), be the conformal Ricci flow on (M,g(t)). Let Vol(Mt) and E(t) be the volume and Yamabe quotient, respectively, along the flow of g(t) with constant scalar curvature. Then

    ddtVol(Mt)=nR0M|RicR0ng|2dμg(t) (2.7)

    and

    ddtE(t)=cnM|RicR0ng|2dμg(t), (2.8)

    where cn is a positive constant depending on the volume and dimension n of M.

    Remark 2.4.

    (1) Evolution equation (2.7) yields ddtVol(Mt)>0 on positive constant scalar curvature unless RicR0ng=0, meaning that the Vol(Mt) is strictly increasing along the conformal Ricci flow unless the metric is Einstein.

    (2) Evolution equation (2.8) yields ddtE(t)>0 unless RicR0ng=0, meaning that the quotient, E(t), is strictly increasing along the conformal Ricci flow unless the metric is Einstein.

    The proof of the Lemma follows from direct computations.

    Proof Recall that Vol(Mt)=Mdμg(t), E(t)=R0(Vol(Mt))2n and tdμg(t)=npdμg(t). Then

    ddtVol(Mt)=nMpdμg(t) (2.9)

    and

    ddtE(t)=2R0(Vol(Mt))2n1Mpdμg(t). (2.10)

    We know that the function p satisfies the elliptic equation, that is, the second equation in system (1.2). Integrating this equation over M using the fact that MΔpdμg=0 since M is closed we get

    R0Mpdμg(t)=M|RicR0ng|2dμg(t).

    Combining this with (2.9) and (2.10) yields the desired formula (2.7) and (2.8), respectively.

    Considering the behaviours of the Yamabe quotient and the volume along the flow g(t), we therefore expect the conformal Ricci flow to be an effective tool for constructing Einstein metrics. In the next section, we will define Yamabe constant via nonlinear subcritical elliptic differential equation, get the evolution of Yamabe constant along the conformal Ricci flow on smooth manifolds of dimension n3 with nonnegative constant scalar curvature, and then construct Einstein metrics.

    Let g(t) and p(t), t[0,T), solve the conformal Ricci flow equations

    {gt+2(RicR0ng)=2pg,  in M×(0,T)(n1)Δp+R0p=|RicR0ng|2, in M×[0,T),g(0)=g0 (3.1)

    on M with nonnegative constant scalar curvature R00.

    In order to discuss the Yamabe problem under (3.1), recall the subcritical regularisation of (2.2) for q(1,n+2n2)

    Lgu=Yq(g)uq,Muq+1dμg=1,

    where Lg:=aΔ+Rg with a=4n1n2 and Yq(g) is a constant. This is the Euler-Lagrange equation for the minimiser of the functional

    Yq(g)=infu>0,uC(M)M(a|u|2+Rgu2)dμg(Muq+1dμq)2q+1.

    The existence of solution u of the problem above is due to the direct method in calculation of variation since q is subcritical exponent.

    To state the main results we want to consider a regularised constant function of time only. Suppose for q(1,n+2n2), there is a C1-family of positive smooth function u(t), t[0,T), which satisfies

    Lg(t)u=˜Yq(t)uq,  Muq+1dμg(t)=1, (3.2)

    where Lg(t):=aΔ+Rg(t) with a=4n1n2 and ˜Yq(t) is a function of t only. Here ˜Yq(t) and Y(g) have the same sign, however, ˜Yq(t) depends on t, not only on the conformal class. We note ˜Yq(t) equals to Y(g) if q attains the critical value q=n+2n2. It coincides with the principal eigenvalue of the conformal Laplacian, Lg, at q=1.

    Proposition 3.1. Let g(t), t[0,T), be the conformal Ricci flow, that is, g(t) satisfies (3.1) on the closed oriented Riemannian manifold (Mn,g0) (n3) with constant scalar curvature, R00. Then, for any q(1,n+2n2], assuming that there is a C1-family of smooth functions u(t)>0,t[0,T) which satisfies (3.2),

    ddt˜Yq(t)=2aM[(RicijR0ngij)iuju+p|u|2]dμg(t)naq+1Mu2Δpdμg(t)n(q1)q+1M(a|u|2+R0u2)pdμg(t). (3.3)

    Proposition 3.2. Let g(t), t[0,T), be the conformal Ricci flow, that is, g(t) satisfies (3.1) on the closed oriented Riemannian manifold (Mn,g0) (n3) with constant scalar curvature, R00. Then, for any q(1,n+2n2], assuming that there is a C1-family of smooth functions u(t)>0,t[0,T) which satisfies (3.2),

    ddt˜Yn+2n2(t)=8(n1)n2M¯Ricijiujudμg(t)+2M|¯Ric|2u2dμg(t), (3.4)

    where ¯Ricij=RicijR0ngij is the traceless part of the Ricci tensor under the flow.

    Remark 3.3. Note that evolution equation (3.4) can be compared with [8,Eq (10)] under the Ricci flow and with [26,Theorem 1.3]. We remark that (3.4) is better than both since conformal Ricci flow is restricted to a smaller configuration of conformal class and there is no involvement of ΔRg(t) (or tRg(t)) since Rg(t)=R00, a constant.

    Proof of Proposition 3.1.

    Referring to (3.2), we have for any q(1,n+2n2] that

    aΔu+Rgu=˜Yq(t)uq (3.5)

    and

    Muq+1dμg=1. (3.6)

    Using (3.5) and (3.6) the problem can be reformulated variationally as

    ˜Yq(t)=M(a|u|2+Rgu2)dμg. (3.7)

    Now, differentiating (3.7) with respect to t we get

    ddt˜Yq(t)=M2a[(RicijR0ngij)iuju+p|u|2+iuiut]dμg+2MRguutdμgnM(a|u|2+Rgu2)pdμg,

    where we have used (|u|2)t=2(RicijR0ngij)iuju+2p|u|2+2iuiut, (dμg)t=npdμg, and Rg=R0 (see Section 2).

    Applying integration by parts, we arrive at

    ddt˜Yq(t)=M2a[(RicijR0ngij)iuju+p|u|2]dμg+2M(autΔu+Ruut)dμgnM(a|u|2+Rgu2)pdμg. (3.8)

    Differentiating the condition (3.6) with respect to t yields

    (q+1)Mutuqdμg=nMpuq+1dμg. (3.9)

    Multiplying (3.5) by pu and applying integration by parts we obtain

    ˜Yq(t)Mpuq+1dμg=a2Mu2Δpdμg+M(a|u|2+Rgu2)pdμg. (3.10)

    Referring to (3.5), (3.9) and (3.10) we have

    2M(autΔu+Ruut)dμg=2˜Yq(t)Mutuqdμg,     (by (3.5))=2nq+1˜Yq(t)Mpuq+1dμg,   (by (3.9))=2nq+1[a2Mu2Δpdμg+M(a|u|2+Rgu2)pdμg].

    Combining this with (3.8) leads us to

    ddt˜Yq(t)=M2a[(RicijR0ngij)iuju+p|u|2]dμgnaq+1Mu2Δpdμg+(2nq+1n)M(a|u|2+Rgu2)pdμg

    which is the desired evolution equation (3.3) for ˜Yq(t).

    Proof of Proposition 3.2.

    Setting q=n+2n2 in (3.3) we obtain

    ddt˜Yn+2n2(t)=2aM(RicijR0ngij)iujudμg2M[(n1)Δp+R0p]u2dμg.

    By considering the second equation in (3.1) we arrive at

    ddt˜Yn+2n2(t)=2aM(RicijR0ngij)iujudμg+2M|RicR0ng|2u2dμg.

    This therefore completes the proof.

    Remark 3.4. Referring to the asssumpton in Propositions 3.1 and 3.2 which says there are functions u(t) such that the metrics u(t)4n2g(t) are a C1-family of smooth metrics which have unit volume and constant scalar curvature (Yamabe metrics), two situations are involved. Namely:

    (1) When ˜Y(0) is nonpositive, there is a unique solution u(0) of the Yamabe problem. It could be shown here, as a consequence of Koiso decomposition [5,14], that the metrics u(t)4n2g(t) is a smooth in t family of metrics for small t.

    (2) When ˜Y(0) is positive, in general it is not certain whether there exists a C1-family of smooth functions u(t) satisfying the assumption even for a short time since the corresponding Yamabe metric is not unique [8].

    It has been observed that Yamabe constant of manifolds of positive Yamabe type can in general behave rather irregularly (see [1,8,14,26]). The evolution equation (3.4) shows a better behaviour since constant scalar curvature is preserved along the flow.

    Now, if one assumes that u(t)4n2g(t) has unit volume and constant scalar curvature Y(g(t)), it is then clear that ˜Y(t)=˜Yn+2n2(t) is the scalar curvature of metric u(t)4n2g(t). We can therefore prove the following results.

    Corollary 3.5. Let (Mn,g0) be a closed oriented Riemannian manifold of dimension n3 and constant scalar curvature. Let g(t), t[0,T) be the conformal Ricci flow with g(0)=g0, where (n1)Δ+R0 is an invertible operator. Then

    (1) There is a C1-family of smooth positive functions u(t) on [0,δ), for some δ>0, with constant u(0), such that u(t)4n2g(t) has unit volume and constant scalar curvature ˜Y(t).

    (2) ddt|t=0˜Y(t)0 and the equality is attained if and only if g0 is an Einstein metric.

    Proof. Since the elliptic operator (n1)Δ+R0 is invertible then Koiso's decomposition theorem (Corollary 2.9 in [14] or Theorem 4.44 in [4]) can be applied to conclude as follows: There exists a C1-family of smooth positive functions u(t) on [0,δ) for some δ>0 with u(0) being a constant and satisfying the assumption of Proposition 3.1 with q=n+2n2. Obviously, ˜Y(t)=˜Yq(t) is the scalar curvature of metric u(t)4n2g(t).

    Now, since u(0)=0. Hence, we have by Proposition 3.2 that

    ddt˜Y(t)|t=0=2[u(0)]2M|¯Ric(g0)|2dμg00.

    If equality is attained in the last inequality then the traceless Ricci tensor ¯Ric(g0) vanishes identically, and consequently, g0 must be Einstein.

    In this section we construct an example on locally homogeneous 3-geometry of the Heisenberg group. Isenberg and Jackson [12] introduced Hamilton Ricci flow on locally homogeneous 3-manifolds as a way to having more understanding of geometrisation conjecture. Isenberg, Jackson and Lu [13] later studied the Ricci flow on locally homogeneous 4-manifolds (see also Cao and Saloff-Coste [6] for the study of backward Ricci flow in this setting). In [10], Fischer opined that locally homogeneous conformal Ricci flow would provide somewhat an intersection (even equivalence) between Hamilton Ricci flow and conformal Ricci flow (see [10,Section 8]). Hence, conformal Ricci flow has the potential to deepen our understanding of geometrisation of 3-manifolds.

    The Heisenberg group is isomorphic to the set of upper-triangle 3×3 matrices

    {[1xz01y001]  |  x,y,zR}

    endowed with the matrix multiplication. This group fails to admit any Einstein metric. Meanwhile, the group admits a Milnor frame {Xi}3i=1 understood with Lie brackets

    [X2,X3]=X1,   [X3,X1]=0   and  [X1,X2]=0

    which can diagnolise the initial metric g0 and the Ricci tensor.

    Let {θi}3i=1 be the frame dual to the Milnor frame {Xi}3i=1 and

    g0=A0(θ1)2+B0(θ2)2+C0(θ3)2.

    We assume that

    g(t)=A(t)(θ1)2+B(t)(θ2)2+C(t)(θ3)2

    be a solution of the conformal Ricci flow. According to [12] under normalisation A0B0C0=1 we have

    Ric11=12A3,   Ric22=12A2B,   Ric33=12A2C,  R=12A2

    and

    Ric2=3R2=34A4.

    The conformal Ricci flow equations are then written as

    {dAdt+A3+13A20A=2pA,(a) dBdtA2B+13A20B=2pB,(b) dCdtA2C+13A20C=2pC,(c) A=A0.(d) (4.1)

    Substituting (4.1)(d) into (4.1)(a) implies that

    43A20=2pA0    p=23A20. (4.2)

    Plugging (4.1)(d) and (4.2) into (4.1)(b) we calculate

    dBdt=2A20B    B(t)=B0eA20t. (4.3)

    Similarly, by plugging (4.1)(d) and (4.2) into (4.1)(c) we obtain

    C(t)=C0eA20t. (4.4)

    By this, we can infer (just as in the case of Hamilton Ricci flow [12]) that asymptotic behaviour of conformal Ricci flow in Heisenberg allows two metric coefficients expand, while the third and the scalar curvature remain constant. Clearly, the expanding directions in Heisenberg class conformal Ricci flow generally diverge. However, by (4.3) and (4.4) we obtain

    BC=(B0C0)eA20t.

    Hence, generic Heisenberg flows move away from the ones with rotational isotropy, (i.e., those with B=C).

    Furthermore, recall that ¯Ricij:=RicijR03gij and |¯Ric|2=|Ric|2R03. Then

    ¯Ric11=23A20g11,  ¯Ric22=13A20g22,  ¯Ric33=13A20g33, and |¯Ric|2=23A4.

    Denote by H3 the Heisenberg group of 3-geometry. Therefore, for ˜Y(t)=˜Yn+2n2(t), we have by definition (3.7) that

    ˜Y(t):=H3(8|u|212A20u2)dμg

    and by evolution formula (3.4) we have

    ddt˜Y=8H3¯Ricijiujudμg(t)+2H3|¯Ric|2u2dμg(t)643H3A20|u|2dμg(t)+43H3A402u2dμg(t)83A20H3(8|u|212A20u2)dμg=83A20˜Y(t).

    This inequality shows that the quantity ˜Y(t)e83A20t is non-decreasing along the conformal Ricci flow of Heisenberg group of 3-geometry.

    This paper dealt with evolutionary behaviour of the subcritical Yamabe constant in the setting of conformal Ricci flow on an n(3)-dimensional closed connected oriented Riemannian manifolds of constant scalar curvature. In particular, the time evolution formula for the Yamabe constant was derived and it was demonstrated that if the flow initial metric is Yamabe then the Yamabe constant is monotonically increasing under some assumption unless the metric is Einstein. Recall that conformal Ricci flow is a modified Hamilton Ricci flow with respect to conformal geometry and is well known to preserve constant scalar curvature of the flow metric. The choice of the conformal Ricci flow in this paper came as a result of the quest for better results. Conformal Ricci flow performs better in this respect since it is restricted to a smaller configuration space than Hamilton Ricci flow.

    Evolution of Yamabe constant has been studied under Ricci flow in [8] and under Ricci flow with boundary in [5]. We remarked that our evolution formula is better than those in these two papers since ours does not involve time evolution and diffusion of the scalar curvature (tRg(t) and ΔRg(t)). We also remarked that similar results have been proved in [10] and [16] but not as a consequence of an evolution equation. Finally, an example of conformal Ricci flow was constructed on locally homogeneous 3-geometry of the Heisenberg group in which case we obtained a nondecreasing quantity involving Yamabe constant as a consequence of the evolution formula. In the next work, we plan to study the Yamabe problem and further extension of the results of this paper with singularity theory and submanifolds theory, etc. in [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28] to obtain new results and theorems.

    The last author (Dr. Akram Ali) extend his appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University for funding this work through the research groups program under grant number R.G.P.1/186/43. This work funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12101168) and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. LQ22A010014).

    There is no conflict of interest.



    [1] M. T. Anderson, On the uniqueness and differentiability in the space of Yamabe metrics, Comm. Contemp. Math., 7 (2005), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219199705001751 doi: 10.1142/S0219199705001751
    [2] T. Aubin, Some nonlinear problems in Riemannian geometry, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, 1998.
    [3] S. Azami, A. Abolarinwa, Evolution of Yamabe constant along Ricci-Burguignon flow, unpulished work.
    [4] A. L. Besse, Einstein manifolds, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987.
    [5] B. Botvinnik, P. Lu, Evolution of relative Yamabe constant under Ricci flow, Osaka J. Math., 57 (2020), 679–687.
    [6] X. Cao, L. Saloff-Coste, Backward Ricci flow on locally homogeneous three manifolds, Comm. Anal. Geom., 17 (2009), 305–325.
    [7] D. Chakraborty, Y. C. Mandal, S. K. Hui, Evolution of some geometric quantities along the Cotton flow, Filomat, 33 (2019), 5087–5095.
    [8] S. C. Chang, P. Lu, Evolution of Yamabe constant under Ricci flow, Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom., 31 (2007), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10455-006-9041-9 doi: 10.1007/s10455-006-9041-9
    [9] F. Danesvar Pip, A. Razavi, Evolution of the Yamabe constant under Bernhard List's flow, Sib. Math. J., 58 (2017), 1004–1011. https://doi.org/10.1134/S003744661706009X doi: 10.1134/S003744661706009X
    [10] A. E. Fischer, An introduction to conformal Ricci flow, Class. Quantum Grav., 21 (2004), 171–218.
    [11] P. T. Ho, On the Ricci-Bourguignon flow, Int. J. Math., 31 (2020), 2050044. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129167X20500445 doi: 10.1142/S0129167X20500445
    [12] J. Isenberg, M. Jackson, Ricci flow of locally homogeneous geometries of closed manifolds, J. Diff. Geom., 35 (1992), 723–741.
    [13] J. Isenberg, M. Jackson, P. Lu, Ricci flow on locally homogeneous closed 4-manifolds, Commun. Anal. Geom., 14 (2006), 345–386.
    [14] N. Koiso, A decomposition of the space M of Riemannian metrics on a manifold, Osaka J. Math., 16 (1979), 423–429.
    [15] J. M. Lee, T. H. Parker, The Yamabe problem, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 17 (1987), 37–91.
    [16] P. Lu, J. Qing, Y. Zheng, A note on conformal Ricci flow, Pacific J. Math., 268 (2014), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.2014.268.413 doi: 10.2140/pjm.2014.268.413
    [17] Y. L. Li, A. Ali, F. Mofarreh, A. Abolarinwa, R. Ali, Some eigenvalues estimate for the ϕ-Laplace operator on slant submanifolds of Sasakian space forms, J. Funct. Spaces, 2021 (2021), 6195939. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6195939 doi: 10.1155/2021/6195939
    [18] Y. L. Li, A. Ali, F. Mofarreh, N. Alluhaibi, Homology groups in warped product submanifolds in hyperbolic spaces, J. Math., 2021 (2021), 8554738. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8554738 doi: 10.1155/2021/8554738
    [19] Y. L. Li, A. Ali, R. Ali, A general inequality for CR-warped products in generalized Sasakian space form and its applications, Adv. Math. Phys., 2021 (2021), 5777554. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5777554 doi: 10.1155/2021/5777554
    [20] Y. L. Li, A. H. Alkhaldi, A. Ali, L. I. Pişcoran, On the topology of warped product pointwise semi-slant submanifolds with positive curvature, Mathematics, 9 (2021), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9243156 doi: 10.3390/math9243156
    [21] Y. L. Li, Y. S. Zhu, Q. Y. Sun, Singularities and dualities of pedal curves in pseudo-hyperbolic and de Sitter space, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys., 18 (2021), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887821500080 doi: 10.1142/S0219887821500080
    [22] Y. L. Li, M. A. Lone, U. A. Wani, Biharmonic submanifolds of Kaehler product manifolds, AIMS Math., 6 (2021), 9309–9321. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021541 doi: 10.3934/math.2021541
    [23] Y. L. Li, D. Ganguly, S. Dey, A. Bhattacharyya, Conformal η-Ricci solitons within the framework of indefinite Kenmotsu manifolds, AIMS Math., 7 (2022), 5408–5430. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022300 doi: 10.3934/math.2022300
    [24] R. Schoen, Conformal deformation of a Riemannian metric to constant scalar curvature, J. Differ. Geom., 20 (1984), 479–495.
    [25] N. Trudinger, Remarks cocerning the conformal deformation of Riemannian structures on compact manifolds, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci., 22 (1968), 265–274.
    [26] E. M. Wang, Y. Zheng Regaularity of the first eigenvalue of the p-Laplacian and Yamabe invariant along geometric flows, Pacific J. Math., 254 (2011), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.2011.254.239 doi: 10.2140/pjm.2011.254.239
    [27] H. Yamabe, On a deformation of Riemannian structures on compact manifolds, Osaka Math. J. 12 (1960), 21–37.
    [28] Z. C. Yang, Y. L. Li, M. Erdoǧdub, Y. S. Zhu, Evolving evolutoids and pedaloids from viewpoints of envelope and singularity theory in Minkowski plane, J. Geom. Phys., 176 (2022), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomphys.2022.104513 doi: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2022.104513
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Yanlin Li, Süleyman Şenyurt, Ahmet Özduran, Davut Canlı, The Characterizations of Parallel q-Equidistant Ruled Surfaces, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 1879, 10.3390/sym14091879
    2. Zhizhi Chen, Yanlin Li, Sumanjit Sarkar, Santu Dey, Arindam Bhattacharyya, Ricci Soliton and Certain Related Metrics on a Three-Dimensional Trans-Sasakian Manifold, 2022, 8, 2218-1997, 595, 10.3390/universe8110595
    3. Yanlin Li, Ali Uçum, Kazım İlarslan, Çetin Camcı, A New Class of Bertrand Curves in Euclidean 4-Space, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 1191, 10.3390/sym14061191
    4. Fatemah Mofarreh, Sachin Kumar Srivastava, Mayrika Dhiman, Wan Ainun Mior Othman, Akram Ali, Mohammad Alomari, Inequalities for the Class of Warped Product Submanifold of Para-Cosymplectic Manifolds, 2022, 2022, 1687-9139, 1, 10.1155/2022/7270446
    5. Yanlin Li, Mohan Khatri, Jay Prakash Singh, Sudhakar K. Chaubey, Improved Chen’s Inequalities for Submanifolds of Generalized Sasakian-Space-Forms, 2022, 11, 2075-1680, 324, 10.3390/axioms11070324
    6. Yanlin Li, Fatemah Mofarreh, Rashad A. Abdel-Baky, Timelike Circular Surfaces and Singularities in Minkowski 3-Space, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 1914, 10.3390/sym14091914
    7. Yanlin Li, Abdul Haseeb, Musavvir Ali, G. Muhiuddin, LP-Kenmotsu Manifolds Admitting η-Ricci Solitons and Spacetime, 2022, 2022, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2022/6605127
    8. Yanlin Li, Somnath Mondal, Santu Dey, Arindam Bhattacharyya, Akram Ali, A Study of Conformal η-Einstein Solitons on Trans-Sasakian 3-Manifold, 2022, 1776-0852, 10.1007/s44198-022-00088-z
    9. Yanlin Li, Rajendra Prasad, Abdul Haseeb, Sushil Kumar, Sumeet Kumar, A Study of Clairaut Semi-Invariant Riemannian Maps from Cosymplectic Manifolds, 2022, 11, 2075-1680, 503, 10.3390/axioms11100503
    10. Yanlin Li, Sahar H. Nazra, Rashad A. Abdel-Baky, Singularity Properties of Timelike Sweeping Surface in Minkowski 3-Space, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 1996, 10.3390/sym14101996
    11. Yanlin Li, Nadia Alluhaibi, Rashad A. Abdel-Baky, One-Parameter Lorentzian Dual Spherical Movements and Invariants of the Axodes, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 1930, 10.3390/sym14091930
    12. Zhizhi Chen, Yanlin Li, Aydin Gezer, Erkan Karakas, Cagri Karaman, E-Connections on the ε-Anti-Kähler Manifolds, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 1899, 10.3390/sym14091899
    13. Sümeyye Gür Mazlum, Süleyman Şenyurt, Luca Grilli, The Dual Expression of Parallel Equidistant Ruled Surfaces in Euclidean 3-Space, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 1062, 10.3390/sym14051062
    14. Haibo Yu, Liang Chen, Singularities of Slant Focal Surfaces along Lightlike Locus on Mixed Type Surfaces, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 1203, 10.3390/sym14061203
    15. Yongqiao Wang, Lin Yang, Pengcheng Li, Yuan Chang, Singularities of Osculating Developable Surfaces of Timelike Surfaces along Curves, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 2251, 10.3390/sym14112251
    16. Sachin Kumar Srivastava, Fatemah Mofarreh, Anuj Kumar, Akram Ali, Characterizations of PR-Pseudo-Slant Warped Product Submanifold of Para-Kenmotsu Manifold with Slant Base, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 1001, 10.3390/sym14051001
    17. Haiming Liu, Jiajing Miao, Extended Legendrian Dualities Theorem in Singularity Theory, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 982, 10.3390/sym14050982
    18. Abimbola Abolarinwa, Shahroud Azami, Variation of the first eigenvalue of Witten Laplacian and consequences under super Perelman-Ricci flow, 2022, 2296-9020, 10.1007/s41808-022-00198-1
    19. Yongqiao Wang, Lin Yang, Yuxin Liu, Yuan Chang, Singularities for Focal Sets of Timelike Sabban Curves in de Sitter 3-Space, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 2471, 10.3390/sym14122471
    20. Qiming Zhao, Lin Yang, Yongqiao Wang, Geometry of Developable Surfaces of Frenet Type Framed Base Curves from the Singularity Theory Viewpoint, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 975, 10.3390/sym14050975
    21. Yanlin Li, Fatemah Mofarreh, Santu Dey, Soumendu Roy, Akram Ali, General Relativistic Space-Time with η1-Einstein Metrics, 2022, 10, 2227-7390, 2530, 10.3390/math10142530
    22. Shahroud Azami, Evolution of eigenvalue of the Wentzell-Laplace operator along the geodesic curvature flow, 2023, 0019-5588, 10.1007/s13226-023-00493-0
    23. Sudhakar Kumar Chaubey, Abdul Haseeb, 2024, Chapter 13, 978-981-99-9749-7, 209, 10.1007/978-981-99-9750-3_13
    24. Areej A. Almoneef, Rashad A. Abdel-Baky, Spacelike Lines with Special Trajectories and Invariant Axodes, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 1087, 10.3390/sym15051087
    25. Areej A. Almoneef, Rashad A. Abdel-Baky, Singularity properties of timelike circular surfaces in Minkowski 3-space, 2023, 20, 0219-8878, 10.1142/S0219887823501979
    26. Abimbola Abolarinwa, Shahroud Azami, First eigenvalues evolution for some geometric operators along the Yamabe flow, 2024, 115, 0047-2468, 10.1007/s00022-024-00717-6
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2260) PDF downloads(95) Cited by(26)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog