
Citation: Hayder S. Al-Madhhachi, Ahmed M. Ajeena, Nihad A. Al-Bughaebi. Dynamic simulation and energy analysis of forced circulation solar thermal system in two various climate cities in Iraq[J]. AIMS Energy, 2021, 9(1): 138-149. doi: 10.3934/energy.2021008
[1] | Laveet Kumar, Jahanzaib Soomro, Hafeez Khoharo, Mamdouh El Haj Assad . A comprehensive review of solar thermal desalination technologies for freshwater production. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(2): 293-318. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023016 |
[2] | Alemayehu T. Eneyaw, Demiss A. Amibe . Annual performance of photovoltaic-thermal system under actual operating condition of Dire Dawa in Ethiopia. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(5): 539-556. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.5.539 |
[3] | Daniel Chuquin-Vasco, Cristina Calderón-Tapia, Nelson Chuquin-Vasco, María Núñez-Moreno, Diana Aguirre-Ruiz, Vanesa G. Lo-Iacono-Ferreira . Mathematical modeling of a binary ORC operated with solar collectors. Case study—Ecuador. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(6): 1153-1178. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023053 |
[4] | D.M. Reddy Prasad, R. Senthilkumar, Govindarajan Lakshmanarao, Saravanakumar Krishnan, B.S. Naveen Prasad . A critical review on thermal energy storage materials and systems for solar applications. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(4): 507-526. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.4.507 |
[5] | Gemma Graugés Graell, George Xydis . Solar Thermal in the Nordics. A Belated Boom for All or Not?. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(1): 69-86. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022005 |
[6] | Akthem Mohi Al-Abdali, Handri Ammari . Thermal energy storage using phase-change material in evacuated-tubes solar collector. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(3): 486-505. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022024 |
[7] | Joanna McFarlane, Jason Richard Bell, David K. Felde, Robert A. Joseph III, A. Lou Qualls, Samuel Paul Weaver . Performance and Thermal Stability of a Polyaromatic Hydrocarbon in a Simulated Concentrating Solar Power Loop. AIMS Energy, 2014, 2(1): 41-70. doi: 10.3934/energy.2014.1.41 |
[8] | Dessie Tadele Embiale, Dawit Gudeta Gunjo, Chandraprabu Venkatachalam, Mohanram Parthiban . Experimental investigation and exergy and energy analysis of a forced convection solar fish dryer integrated with thermal energy storage. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(3): 412-433. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022021 |
[9] | Chao-Jen Li, Peiwen Li, Kai Wang, Edgar Emir Molina . Survey of Properties of Key Single and Mixture Halide Salts for Potential Application as High Temperature Heat Transfer Fluids for Concentrated Solar Thermal Power Systems. AIMS Energy, 2014, 2(2): 133-157. doi: 10.3934/energy.2014.2.133 |
[10] | Xian-long Meng, Cun-liang Liu, Xiao-hui Bai, De-hai Kong, Kun Du . Improvement of the performance of parabolic trough solar concentrator using freeform optics and CPV/T design. AIMS Energy, 2021, 9(2): 286-304. doi: 10.3934/energy.2021015 |
Renewable energies from the sun, such as solar, geothermal, and wind sources, are lasting and significantly have a lot less environmental impact than the traditional fossil fuels as the energy resources. In recent decades, solar energy has become the most important renewable energy source in the world. The use of this solar energy includes many fields lately, such as space heating, pool heating, hot water (DHW) production, cooling, and electrical production without polluting the environment [1]. Solar hot water systems exemplify the most widespread application of solar energy in the present time. There are two types of solar water heating systems: an active solar system or a forced circulation system and a passive solar or natural circulation system (Thermosyphon) [2].
Iraq receives temperatures more than 45 ℃ in most of the days, except for the short winter. Inhabitance of Iraq rose from 32 million in 2010 and predictable to grow to approximately 64 million in 2050. Iraq knows for electric power leakage because of its wars, where this problem maximizes through the summer. Iraq is one of the countries to be the richest in renewable energy resources [3].
In many studies around the forced circulation solar system [4], Zeghib and Chaker (2011) used a time-marching model and simulated a forced circulation solar thermal system's performance. In [5], Lima et al. (2006) studied the use of the TRNSYS for optimization of solar thermal flat-plate collector and tank of the solar thermal system. In [6], Yaïci et al. (2012) study used TRNSYS software to create a model and simulation of the solar thermal energy system to optimize key design parameters. In [7], Yang and Shue (2013) studied the effected temperature stratification on collector efficiency. The temperature stratification in the storage tank is vital because mixing cold water with hot water increases the collector's temperature and reduces the system efficiencies. In [8], Mohammed et al. (2011) has configured a model by TRNSYS and confirm the performance of a direct solar thermal system in Baghdad, Iraq. In [9], Fayath (2011) used a mathematical model to predict thermal characteristics for a solar water heater. In [10], Ali (2010) studied the use of the model is (half-sine) for solar thermal water heating for domestic or industrial applications. In [11], Tiwari et al. (2020) developed TRNSYS model of a commercially useful active flat plate collector applied for solar water heating system. The proposed model predicts the efficiency of the solar water heating system for different climates and seasonal changes during a year. The best performance of the solar water heating system is during winter (January-April and October-December). In [12], Babalis and Nielsen (2013) studied validation of a thermosyphon solar water heating using Trnsys model simulation and conformity within 4.7% difference is noted. In [13], Sultana et al. (2015) developed TRNSYS model of a solar system concentrating collector for water heating and solar cooling and studied the impact of various load profiles on the system efficiency. In [14], Abdunnabia et al. (2014) validated of the Trnsys model simulation of forced circulation solar water heating system by comparing the simulated results with the experimental data.The research's primary purposes are summarized as follows:
● The validated model's essential purpose focused on predicting a forced circulation SWH system's long-term thermal performance in different locations.
● SWH system performances simulation under different load profiles and operating conditions for each climate region.
● Appropriate TRNSYS simulation models have been created for the forced circulation solar thermal system in Iraq.
● Predicted monthly and annual auxiliary energy needed by the solar thermal system.
Transient simulation (TRNSYS) software was used to create a model for the forced circulation solar water heating system, as shown in Figure 1. The model's major element is solar thermal flat plate collector, storage tank, pump (in forced circulation), and controller. Weather Generator (Type 54) was used to provide a reading of weather data for two cities (Baghdad and Basrah). The forcing function (Type 14) define the hot water draw profile. The controller (Type 2) controls the signal value selected depending on the difference between lower and upper temperatures. The pump of fluid (Type 3) uses a variable control function for determining a mass flow rate. The Integrator (Type 24) is used to define quantities integrated over some time. Type 25 is printing simulation information [15]. The main TRNSYS components for the model of the solar water heating system are summarized in Table 1. Table 2 shows the main design and operating parameters values of the solar system components in the TRNSYS model.
Component name | Icon | Symbol |
Flat-plate collector | ![]() |
Type 1 |
Solar radiation processor | ![]() |
Type 16 |
Thermal storage tank | ![]() |
Type 4 |
Circulation pump | ![]() |
Type 3 |
Pump controller | ![]() |
Type 2 |
Plotter | ![]() |
Type 65 |
Weather generator | ![]() |
Type 54 |
Forcing function | ![]() |
Type 14 |
Integration | ![]() |
Type 24 |
Results | ![]() |
Type 25 |
Parameters | Value | Unit |
Flat-plate collector | ||
Collector area | 10 | m2 |
Fluid specific heat | 4.190 | kJ/kg.K |
Intercept efficiency | 0.8 | |
Efficiency slope (Heat transfer coefficient) | 13 | kJ/hr.m2.K |
Collector slope | 17 | degrees |
Azimuth angle | degrees | |
Latitude (Baghdad) | 33.33°N | degrees |
Latitude (Basrah) | 30.35°N | degrees |
Longitude (Baghdad) | 44.44°E | degrees |
Longitude (Basrah) | 47.5°E | degrees |
Solar constant | 4871 | kJ/hr.m2 |
Thermal storage tank | ||
Tank volume | 0.8 | m3 |
Fluid density | 1000 | kg/m3 |
Boiling point | 100 | C |
Height | 1 | m |
Pump | ||
Maximum power | 300 | kJ/hr |
Power coefficient | 0.5 |
The hourly consumption of hot water differs from a day to another and from family to another. For the present simulation, Hot water consumption profile (100 L/person) is distributed during a day on 15th February, as shown in Figure 2.
The climate of Iraq is characterized by mild winter and hot, dry summer with maximum summer temperatures of up to (45 ℃) and a minimum winter temperature (5 ℃). The research is conducted in two cities of Iraq by inputting their weather data. Their primary coordinates are summarized in Baghdad (Latitude of 33.33°N, Longitude of 44.44°E) and Basrah (Latitude of 30.35°N, Longitude of 47.5°E). The ambient temperature and the irradiation data on a horizontal plane for each month of the studied cities are shown in Figure 3. Iraq's daily sunshine duration fluctuates from about 7 hours in winter to about 12 hours in summer [16].
The simulation results are presented in Table 3, which shows the monthly values of auxiliary energy Qaux, hot water load QL, and energy yield Qs. The available energy is maximum in midmost summer when cooling is required, and the sun is approximately least in mid-winter. The energy yield is most significant in mid-summer and least in midmost winter. There is minimum energy available in winter, ambient temperature is low, and the collector's heat loss is maximum. The monthly collector efficiency is maximum (69% in Baghdad and 54% in Basrah) in the summer and minimum (62% in Baghdad and 51% in Basrah) in the winter season. This typical pattern is as would be predictable from the energy analysis and thermal efficiency in Table 3.
Month | Auxiliary energy (MJ) | Load (MJ) | Energy yield (MJ) | Thermal efficiency | |||||
Baghdad | Basrah | Baghdad | Basrah | Baghdad | Basrah | Baghdad | Basrah | ||
January | 2980 | 2607 | 4846 | 5826 | 1857 | 3273 | 0.62 | 0.51 | |
February | 2358 | 2203 | 5172 | 5450 | 2922 | 3351 | 0.67 | 0.51 | |
March | 2312 | 2135 | 6119 | 6367 | 3930 | 4369 | 0.68 | 0.52 | |
April | 2024 | 1933 | 6185 | 6330 | 4300 | 4541 | 0.71 | 0.53 | |
May | 1793 | 1769 | 6821 | 6829 | 5203 | 5233 | 0.75 | 0.53 | |
June | 1484 | 1254 | 6864 | 7059 | 5567 | 6007 | 0.78 | 0.54 | |
July | 1357 | 1459 | 7277 | 7191 | 6121 | 5917 | 0.79 | 0.57 | |
August | 1416 | 1676 | 7226 | 6970 | 6006 | 5463 | 0.81 | 0.59 | |
September | 1675 | 1810 | 6678 | 6544 | 5160 | 4881 | 0.80 | 0.56 | |
October | 2372 | 2235 | 6087 | 6280 | 3812 | 4165 | 0.78 | 0.56 | |
November | 2657 | 2404 | 5338 | 5863 | 2757 | 3560 | 0.69 | 0.54 | |
December | 2955 | 2787 | 4980 | 5481 | 2073 | 2761 | 0.64 | 0.52 | |
Total | 25387 | 24279 | 73598 | 76195 | 49712 | 53527 | |||
Annual average | 2115 | 2023 | 6133 | 6349 | 4142 | 4460 |
The performance of the forced circulation solar thermal system depends on the solar fraction. Solar fraction and auxiliary energy are evaluated in Baghdad and Basrah and compared with each other. Monthly solar fraction and auxiliary energy values in these cities are fluctuating from (39%, 2980 MJ) to (81%, 1357 MJ) in Baghdad and from (49%, 2787 MJ) to (82%, 1245 MJ) in Basrah, respectively as shown in Figures 4 and 5. It should be noted that solar radiation was very high in summer and heating needs are much higher than in the winter season. Figures 4 and 5 shows that the increase in a solar fraction decreases the quantity of auxiliary energy.
In this section, the storage tank is supposed to be divided into five cases (2, 4, 6, 8, 10) of isothermal layers of equal height tank to investigate the effect of stratification on solar efficiency system in the storage tank. The results of the simulation were used to plot Figure 6. It is interesting to note the difference between the average efficiency of the collector in the five cases. This increase in the isothermal layers in the storage tank is due to the reduced water temperature at the tank's lower level. The temperature supply to the collector is lower than that of the top. The lowered inlet temperature to flat plate collector reduced flat plate collector heat loss, and therefore a rise in collector efficiency.
The solar flat plate collector is considered an essential part of the forced circulation solar water heating system because it simultaneously has two advantages. It gets solar energy immediately, and secondly, it conveyed this solar energy to heat to transport it to the storage tank. Figure 7 shows the development of the outlet temperature from the flat plate collector, outlet temperature from the storage tank, bottom temperature of the storage tank, and the pump's operation during the one day in cold winter month (15th February) in Baghdad city. The flat plate collector's outlet temperature rises during the morning to reach 50 ℃ at 3 pm and then begin decreasing until sunset. The outlet temperature of the solar thermal collector takes the manner of solar radiation. It can also note a decrease in the top layer's temperature during the hot water consumption periods, and this temperature is approximately constant. For example, at 12 h (the highest daily consumption load), the top layer's temperature in the storage tank decreases from 60 ℃ to 45 ℃. The switch on and off the pump's operation by using a solar pump controller adjusts within the solar circuit when the temperature of the outlet in the solar thermal collector is greater than the temperature in the bottom tank. Two temperature sensors are required: one located at the solar thermal collector outlet measures the temperature outlet collector (T1), and one located at the bottom of the storage tank measures the temperature (T2). The signals coming from the two temperature sensors in the collector and tank are compared in a control unit. The solar pump is turned on at a temperature difference (T1–T2) equal to or higher than 5 ℃ and is switched off when the same temperature exceeds a minimum of 5 ℃.
It should be noted that the daily consumption of hot water affects a solar thermal system's performance. The model has been simulated on average daily consumption in three cases ranging from 40 l/day (1 person, low consumption), 70 l/day (1 person, regular consumption), and 100 l/day (1 person, high consumption). The results obtained from the simulation under Baghdad and Basrah conditions are presented in Figures 8 and 9. It is important to note that domestic hot water consumption is lower achieved a higher solar fraction and noted that the solar fraction in all three cases is higher in the summer season and gets lower in the winter months. For the high-profile consumption case, the yearly solar fraction is approximately (64% in Baghdad and 67% in Basrah) compared with (85% in Baghdad and 91% in Basrah) in the low-profile consumption case.
It is a significant benefit of solar energy and its practical applications since it is an influential sustainable energy source in the latest years. One of the critical targets of this research was determining the accessibility of solar energy and solving power reduction that adversely influences people's comfort. Several conclusions have discovered and can be summarized as follows:
● The primary conclusion from the simulation results in this paper is that almost all Iraq cities have substantial potential in applying solar water heating systems.
● According to the simulation results, the solar fraction's maximum values were obtained by the solar water heating system in the Basrah city due to the high solar energy. The average solar fraction value in the winter season is 66%.
● Efficiency of solar energy to heat the water, the system could provide in Baghdad city (67–81% in summer and 39–62% in winter) and (69–82% in summer and (49–66% in winter) in Basrah city.
● During the cold months, (2980 MJ/month) in Baghdad and about (2607 MJ/month) in Basrah, the maximum auxiliary energy was used.
● Increased isothermal layers in the solar thermal system's storage tank can increase the collector efficiency by 6–8% for Baghdad and Basrah.
● The simulations present a higher performance of the solar water heating system (SDHW) if the domestic hot water consumption is low.
● The validated TRNSYS model can predict solar thermal systems' performance at various locations and conditions of operation.
The authors wish to acknowledge the scientific and financial supports from the Iraqi Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, University of Kufa, Faculty of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering department.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
[1] |
Popescu LL, Popescu RŞ, Damian A (2017) Simulation study of a solar residential heating system. Energy Procedia 112: 673–679. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1136
![]() |
[2] | Goswami DY (2015) Principles of solar engineering, boca raton London New York, Taylor & Francis Group. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/25064532/Principles_of_Solar_Engineering_Third_Edition. |
[3] |
Kazem HA, Chaichan MT (2012) Status and prospects of renewable energy in Iraq. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16: 6007–6012. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.058
![]() |
[4] |
Zeghib I, Chaker A (2011) Simulation of a solar domestic water heating system. Energy Procedia 6: 292–301. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.05.033
![]() |
[5] |
Lima JBA, Prado RTA, Montoro Taborianski V (2006) Optimization of tank and flat-plate collector of solar water heating system for single-family households to assure economic efficiency through the TRNSYS program. Renew Energy 31: 1581–1595. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2005.09.006
![]() |
[6] | Yaïci W, Entchev E, Lombardi K (2012) Experimental and simulation study on a solar domestic hot water system with flat-plate collectors for the Canadian climatic conditions. ASME 2012 6th Int Conf Energy Sustain ES 2012, Collocated with ASME 2012 10th Int Conf Fuel Cell Sci Eng Technol, 69–78. |
[7] | Yang R, Shue NS (2013) Simulation study for the effect of the storage design on the performance of a large solar hot water system. IEEE Green Technol Conf, 467–472. |
[8] | Mohammed MN, Alghoul MA, Abulqasem K, et al. (2011) TRNSYS simulation of solar water heating system in Iraq. Recent Res Geogr Geol Energy, Environ Biomed - Proc 4th WSEAS Int Conf EMESEG'11, 2nd Int Conf WORLD-GEO'11, 5th Int Conf EDEB'11, 153–156. |
[9] | Fayath MA (2011) Prediction of thermal characteristics for solar water heater. Anbar J Eng Sci 4: 18–32. |
[10] | Ali MH (2010) Solar thermal water heating for domestic or industrial application (new trend modeling). Eng Tech J 28: 2178–2195. |
[11] | Tiwari AK, Gupta S, Joshi AK, et al. (2020) TRNSYS simulation of flat plate solar collector based water heating system in Indian climatic condition. Mater Today Proc. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214785320366840. |
[12] | Babalis S, Nielsen J (2013) Modelling tools for the prediction of performance of large custom-made solar thermal systemse. Eur Sol Therm Ind Fed ESTIF, SCF II Projec, 1–26. |
[13] |
Sultana T, Morrison GL, Taylor R, et al. (2015) TRNSYS modeling of a linear Fresnel concentrating collector for solar cooling and hot water applications. J Sol Energy Eng Trans ASME 137: 1–9. doi: 10.1115/1.4028868
![]() |
[14] |
Abdunnabia MJR, Alakder KMA, Alkishriwi NA, et al. (2014) Experimental validation of forced circulation of solar water heating systems in TRNSYS. Energy Procedia 57: 2477–2486. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.257
![]() |
[15] | Duffie JA, Beckman WA (2013) Solar engineering of thermal processes, United States of America, Wiley & Sons. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/18926928/John_A_Duffie_Solar_Engineering_of_Thermal_Processes_4th_Edition_2013_by_John_Wiley_and_Sons. |
[16] | Ministry of agriculture. Iraqi Agrometeorological Network. Available from: https://agromet.gov.iq/. |
1. | Mehran Dehghan, Carlos F. Pfeiffer, Elyas Rakhshani, Reza Bakhshi-Jafarabadi, A Review on Techno-Economic Assessment of Solar Water Heating Systems in the Middle East, 2021, 14, 1996-1073, 4944, 10.3390/en14164944 | |
2. | Samer Ali, Charbel Habchi, Hassan Zaytoun, Mahmoud Khaled, Talib Dbouk, Surrogate-based optimization of the attack and inclination angles of a delta winglet pair vortex generator in turbulent channel flow, 2023, 20, 26662027, 100473, 10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100473 | |
3. | Ahmed Remlaoui, Driss Nehari, Benhanifia Kada, Nor Ain Azeany Mohd Nasir, Assmaa Abd-Elmonem, Neissrien Alhubieshi, Fayza Abdel Aziz ElSeabee, Syed M. Hussain, Numerical simulation of a forced circulation solar water heating system, 2024, 14, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-024-80576-y |
Component name | Icon | Symbol |
Flat-plate collector | ![]() |
Type 1 |
Solar radiation processor | ![]() |
Type 16 |
Thermal storage tank | ![]() |
Type 4 |
Circulation pump | ![]() |
Type 3 |
Pump controller | ![]() |
Type 2 |
Plotter | ![]() |
Type 65 |
Weather generator | ![]() |
Type 54 |
Forcing function | ![]() |
Type 14 |
Integration | ![]() |
Type 24 |
Results | ![]() |
Type 25 |
Parameters | Value | Unit |
Flat-plate collector | ||
Collector area | 10 | m2 |
Fluid specific heat | 4.190 | kJ/kg.K |
Intercept efficiency | 0.8 | |
Efficiency slope (Heat transfer coefficient) | 13 | kJ/hr.m2.K |
Collector slope | 17 | degrees |
Azimuth angle | degrees | |
Latitude (Baghdad) | 33.33°N | degrees |
Latitude (Basrah) | 30.35°N | degrees |
Longitude (Baghdad) | 44.44°E | degrees |
Longitude (Basrah) | 47.5°E | degrees |
Solar constant | 4871 | kJ/hr.m2 |
Thermal storage tank | ||
Tank volume | 0.8 | m3 |
Fluid density | 1000 | kg/m3 |
Boiling point | 100 | C |
Height | 1 | m |
Pump | ||
Maximum power | 300 | kJ/hr |
Power coefficient | 0.5 |
Month | Auxiliary energy (MJ) | Load (MJ) | Energy yield (MJ) | Thermal efficiency | |||||
Baghdad | Basrah | Baghdad | Basrah | Baghdad | Basrah | Baghdad | Basrah | ||
January | 2980 | 2607 | 4846 | 5826 | 1857 | 3273 | 0.62 | 0.51 | |
February | 2358 | 2203 | 5172 | 5450 | 2922 | 3351 | 0.67 | 0.51 | |
March | 2312 | 2135 | 6119 | 6367 | 3930 | 4369 | 0.68 | 0.52 | |
April | 2024 | 1933 | 6185 | 6330 | 4300 | 4541 | 0.71 | 0.53 | |
May | 1793 | 1769 | 6821 | 6829 | 5203 | 5233 | 0.75 | 0.53 | |
June | 1484 | 1254 | 6864 | 7059 | 5567 | 6007 | 0.78 | 0.54 | |
July | 1357 | 1459 | 7277 | 7191 | 6121 | 5917 | 0.79 | 0.57 | |
August | 1416 | 1676 | 7226 | 6970 | 6006 | 5463 | 0.81 | 0.59 | |
September | 1675 | 1810 | 6678 | 6544 | 5160 | 4881 | 0.80 | 0.56 | |
October | 2372 | 2235 | 6087 | 6280 | 3812 | 4165 | 0.78 | 0.56 | |
November | 2657 | 2404 | 5338 | 5863 | 2757 | 3560 | 0.69 | 0.54 | |
December | 2955 | 2787 | 4980 | 5481 | 2073 | 2761 | 0.64 | 0.52 | |
Total | 25387 | 24279 | 73598 | 76195 | 49712 | 53527 | |||
Annual average | 2115 | 2023 | 6133 | 6349 | 4142 | 4460 |
Component name | Icon | Symbol |
Flat-plate collector | ![]() |
Type 1 |
Solar radiation processor | ![]() |
Type 16 |
Thermal storage tank | ![]() |
Type 4 |
Circulation pump | ![]() |
Type 3 |
Pump controller | ![]() |
Type 2 |
Plotter | ![]() |
Type 65 |
Weather generator | ![]() |
Type 54 |
Forcing function | ![]() |
Type 14 |
Integration | ![]() |
Type 24 |
Results | ![]() |
Type 25 |
Parameters | Value | Unit |
Flat-plate collector | ||
Collector area | 10 | m2 |
Fluid specific heat | 4.190 | kJ/kg.K |
Intercept efficiency | 0.8 | |
Efficiency slope (Heat transfer coefficient) | 13 | kJ/hr.m2.K |
Collector slope | 17 | degrees |
Azimuth angle | degrees | |
Latitude (Baghdad) | 33.33°N | degrees |
Latitude (Basrah) | 30.35°N | degrees |
Longitude (Baghdad) | 44.44°E | degrees |
Longitude (Basrah) | 47.5°E | degrees |
Solar constant | 4871 | kJ/hr.m2 |
Thermal storage tank | ||
Tank volume | 0.8 | m3 |
Fluid density | 1000 | kg/m3 |
Boiling point | 100 | C |
Height | 1 | m |
Pump | ||
Maximum power | 300 | kJ/hr |
Power coefficient | 0.5 |
Month | Auxiliary energy (MJ) | Load (MJ) | Energy yield (MJ) | Thermal efficiency | |||||
Baghdad | Basrah | Baghdad | Basrah | Baghdad | Basrah | Baghdad | Basrah | ||
January | 2980 | 2607 | 4846 | 5826 | 1857 | 3273 | 0.62 | 0.51 | |
February | 2358 | 2203 | 5172 | 5450 | 2922 | 3351 | 0.67 | 0.51 | |
March | 2312 | 2135 | 6119 | 6367 | 3930 | 4369 | 0.68 | 0.52 | |
April | 2024 | 1933 | 6185 | 6330 | 4300 | 4541 | 0.71 | 0.53 | |
May | 1793 | 1769 | 6821 | 6829 | 5203 | 5233 | 0.75 | 0.53 | |
June | 1484 | 1254 | 6864 | 7059 | 5567 | 6007 | 0.78 | 0.54 | |
July | 1357 | 1459 | 7277 | 7191 | 6121 | 5917 | 0.79 | 0.57 | |
August | 1416 | 1676 | 7226 | 6970 | 6006 | 5463 | 0.81 | 0.59 | |
September | 1675 | 1810 | 6678 | 6544 | 5160 | 4881 | 0.80 | 0.56 | |
October | 2372 | 2235 | 6087 | 6280 | 3812 | 4165 | 0.78 | 0.56 | |
November | 2657 | 2404 | 5338 | 5863 | 2757 | 3560 | 0.69 | 0.54 | |
December | 2955 | 2787 | 4980 | 5481 | 2073 | 2761 | 0.64 | 0.52 | |
Total | 25387 | 24279 | 73598 | 76195 | 49712 | 53527 | |||
Annual average | 2115 | 2023 | 6133 | 6349 | 4142 | 4460 |