A static multiple detector solar radiation sensor

J. Appelbaum; J. Appelbaum

doi:10.3934/energy.2020.5.802

AIMS Energy

2020, Volume 8, Issue 5: 802-818. doi: 10.3934/energy.2020.5.802

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

A static multiple detector solar radiation sensor

J. Appelbaum ^,

School of Electrical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Israel

Received: 27 March 2020 Accepted: 03 August 2020 Published: 28 August 2020

A small static solar radiation sensor comprising of 17 photodiode detectors deployed evenly on a hemispherical-member is proposed. The sensor is capable of measuring the intensity and time dependent of the solar radiation components on any desired inclined and oriented plane, including the distribution of the diffuse radiation in the sky. The sensor may also be used in solar tracking systems for pointing to the highest radiation intensity at any time. An inverted sensor may also measure reflected radiation from different objects. As a first design, the accuracy obtained is about 10 to 15 percent, depending of the solar radiation intensity, and the aiming is to improve the accuracy to about 5 percent. The objective was to construct a static sensor with small dimensions and of light-weight, detectors and hemispherical-dome hermetically sealed and machined close to a prototype product.

Keywords:

static solar radiation sensor,
multiple detector solar radiation sensor,
mapping solar radiation in sky

Citation: J. Appelbaum. A static multiple detector solar radiation sensor[J]. AIMS Energy, 2020, 8(5): 802-818. doi: 10.3934/energy.2020.5.802

Related Papers:

[1]	Ee Sann Tan, Kumaran Palanisamy, Teuku Meurah Indra Mahlia, Kunio Yoshikawa . Performance and emission study on waste cooking oil biodiesel and distillate blends for microturbine application. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(4): 798-809. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.4.798
[2]	Sunbong Lee, Shaku Tei, Kunio Yoshikawa . Properties of chicken manure pyrolysis bio-oil blended with diesel and its combustion characteristics in RCEM, Rapid Compression and Expansion Machine. AIMS Energy, 2014, 2(3): 210-218. doi: 10.3934/energy.2014.3.210
[3]	Shemelis Nigatu Gebremariam, Jorge Mario Marchetti . Biodiesel production technologies: review. AIMS Energy, 2017, 5(3): 425-457. doi: 10.3934/energy.2017.3.425
[4]	Hussein A. Mahmood, Ali O. Al-Sulttani, Hayder A. Alrazen, Osam H. Attia . The impact of different compression ratios on emissions, and combustion characteristics of a biodiesel engine. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(5): 924-945. doi: 10.3934/energy.2024043
[5]	Dejene Beyene, Dejene Bekele, Bezu Abera . Biodiesel from blended microalgae and waste cooking oils: Optimization, characterization, and fuel quality studies. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(2): 408-438. doi: 10.3934/energy.2024019
[6]	Tien Duy Nguyen, Trung Tran Anh, Vinh Tran Quang, Huy Bui Nhat, Vinh Nguyen Duy . An experimental evaluation of engine performance and emissions characteristics of a modified direct injection diesel engine operated in RCCI mode. AIMS Energy, 2020, 8(6): 1069-1087. doi: 10.3934/energy.2020.6.1069
[7]	Yadessa Gonfa Keneni, Jorge Mario Marchetti . Oil extraction from plant seeds for biodiesel production. AIMS Energy, 2017, 5(2): 316-340. doi: 10.3934/energy.2017.2.316
[8]	Lihao Chen, Hu Wu, Kunio Yoshikawa . Research on upgrading of pyrolysis oil from Japanese cedar by blending with biodiesel. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(4): 869-883. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.4.869
[9]	Quoc Dang Tran, Thanh Nhu Nguyen, Vinh Nguyen Duy . Effect of piston geometry design and spark plug position on the engine performance and emission characteristics. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(1): 156-170. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023009
[10]	Charalambos Chasos, George Karagiorgis, Chris Christodoulou . Technical and Feasibility Analysis of Gasoline and Natural Gas Fuelled Vehicles. AIMS Energy, 2014, 2(1): 71-88. doi: 10.3934/energy.2014.1.71

Abstract

1. Introduction and definitions

To understand in a clear way the notions used in our main results, we need to add here some basic literature of Geometric function theory. For this we start first with the notation $\mathcal{A}$ which denotes the class of holomorphic or analytic functions in the region $\mathfrak{D} = \left \{ z\in \mathbb{C} :\left \vert z\right \vert < 1\right \}$ and if a function $g\in \mathcal{A}$ , then the relations $g\left(0\right) = g^{\prime }\left(0\right) -1 = 0$ must hold. Also, all univalent functions will be in a subfamily $\mathcal{S}$ of $\mathcal{A}$ . Next we consider to define the idea of subordinations between analytic functions $g_1$ and $g_2,$ indicated by $g_1\left(z\right) \prec g_2\left(z\right),$ as; the functions $g_1, g_2\in \mathcal{A}$ are connected by the relation of subordination, if there exists an analytic function $w$ with the restrictions $w\left(0\right) = 0$ and $\left \vert w\left(z\right) \right \vert < 1$ such that $g_1(z) = g_2(w(z)).$ Moreover, if the function $g_2\in \mathcal{S}$ in $\mathfrak{D},$ then we obtain:

$\begin{equation*} g_1(z)\prec g_2(z)\Leftrightarrow \left[ g_1(0) = g_2(0)\ \ \text{& }\ g_1(\mathfrak{D} )\subset g_1(\mathfrak{D}\mathbb{})\right] . \end{equation*}$

In 1992, Ma and Minda ^[16] considered a holomorphic function $\varphi$ normalized by the conditions $\varphi (0) = 1$ and $\varphi ^{\prime }(0) > 0$ with $Re\varphi > 0$ in $\mathfrak{D}$ . The function $\varphi$ maps the disc $\mathfrak{D}$ onto region which is star-shaped about $1$ and symmetric along the real axis. In particular, the function $\varphi (z) = (1+Az)/(1+Bz), \ (-1\leq B < A\leq 1)$ maps $\mathfrak{D}$ onto the disc on the right-half plane with centre on the real axis and diameter end points $\frac{1-A}{1-B}$ and $\frac{1+A}{1+B}$ . This interesting familiar function is named as Janowski function ^[10]. The image of the function $\varphi (z) = \sqrt{1+z}$ shows that the image domain is bounded by the right-half of the Bernoulli lemniscate given by $|w^{2}-1| < 1, \$ ^[25]. The function $\varphi (z) = 1+\frac{4}{3}z+\frac{2}{3}z^{2}$ maps $\mathfrak{D}$ into the image set bounded by the cardioid given by $(9x^{2}+9y^{2}-18x+5)^{2}-16(9x^{2}+9y^{2}-6x+1) = 0,$ ^[21] and further studied in ^[23]. The function $\varphi (z) = 1+\sin z$ was examined by Cho and his coauthors in ^[3] while $\varphi (z) = e^{z}$ is recently studied in ^[17] and ^[24]. Further, by choosing particular $\varphi, \$ several subclasses of starlike functions have been studied. See the details in ^{[2,4,5,11,12,14,19]}.

Recently, Ali et al. ^[1] have obtained sufficient conditions on $\alpha$ such that

$\begin{equation*} \begin{array}{llll} 1+zg^{\prime }(z)/g^{n}(z)\prec \sqrt{1+z} & \Rightarrow & g\left( z\right) \prec \sqrt{1+z}, & \text{for }n = 0,1,2. \end{array} \end{equation*}$

Similar implications have been studied by various authors, for example see the works of Halim and Omar ^[6], Haq et al ^[7], Kumar et al ^[13,15], Paprocki and Sokól ^[18], Raza et al ^[20] and Sharma et al ^[22].

In 1994, Hayman ^[8] studied multivalent ( $p$ -valent) functions which is a generalization of univalent functions and is defined as: an analytic function $g$ in an arbitrary domain $\mathcal{D}\subset \mathbb{C}$ is said to be $p$ -valent, if for every complex number $\omega$ , the equation $g(z) = \omega$ has maximum $p$ roots in $\mathcal{D}$ and for a complex number $\omega _{0}$ the equation $g(z) = \omega _{0}$ has exactly $p$ roots in $\mathcal{D}$ . Let $\mathcal{A}_{p}$ $\left(p\in \mathbb{N} = \left \{ 1, 2, \ldots \right \} \right)$ denote the class of functions, say $g\in \mathcal{A}_{p}$ , that are multivalent holomorphic in the unit disc $\mathfrak{D}$ and which have the following series expansion:

$\begin{equation} g(z) = z^{p}+\sum \limits_{k = p+1}^{\infty }a_{k}z^{k},\text{ }\left( z\in \mathfrak{D}\right) . \end{equation}$

(1.1)

Using the idea of multivalent functions, we now introduce the class $\mathcal{SL}_{p}^{\ast }$ of multivalent starlike functions associated with lemniscate of Bernoulli and as given below:

$\begin{equation*} \mathcal{SL}_{p}^{\ast } = \left \{ g(z)\in \mathcal{A}_{p}:\frac{zg^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{pg(z)}\prec \sqrt{1+z},\text{ }\left( z\in \mathfrak{D} \right) \right \} . \end{equation*}$

In this article, we determine conditions on $\alpha$ such that for each

$\begin{equation*} \begin{array}{lllll} 1+\alpha \frac{z^{2+p\left( j-1\right) }g^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{ pg^{j}\left( z\right) },\text{ for each }j = 0,1,2,3, \end{array} \end{equation*}$

are subordinated to Janowski functions implies $\frac{g\left(z\right) }{ z^{p}}\prec \sqrt{1+z}, \ \left(z\in \mathfrak{D}\right)$ . These results are then utilized to show that $g$ are in the class $\mathcal{SL}_{p}^{\ast }.$

1.1. Lemma

Let $w$ be analytic non-constant function in $\mathfrak{D}$ with $w\left(0\right) = 0.$ If

$\begin{equation*} \left \vert w\left( z_{0}\right) \right \vert = \max \left \{ \left \vert w\left( z\right) \right \vert ,\ \ \ \left \vert z\right \vert \leq \left \vert z_{0}\right \vert \right \} ,\ \ z\in \mathfrak{D}\text{,} \end{equation*}$

then there exists a real number $m\ \left(m\geq 1\right)$ such that $z_{0}w^{\prime }\left(z_{0}\right) = mw\left(z_{0}\right).$

This Lemma is known as Jack's Lemma and it has been proved in ^[9].

2. Main results

2.1. Theorem

Let $g\in \mathcal{A}_{p}$ and satisfying

$\begin{equation*} 1+\frac{\alpha z^{1-p}g^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{p}\prec \frac{1+Az}{1+Bz}, \end{equation*}$

with the restriction on $\alpha$ is

$\begin{equation} \left \vert \alpha \right \vert \geq \frac{2^{\frac{3}{2}}p\left( A-B\right) }{1-\left \vert B\right \vert -4p\left( 1+\left \vert B\right \vert \right) } . \end{equation}$

(2.1)

Then

$\begin{equation*} \frac{g\left( z\right) }{z^{p}}\prec \sqrt{1+z}. \end{equation*}$

Proof

Let us define a function

$\begin{equation} p\left( z\right) = 1+\frac{\alpha z^{1-p}g^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{p}, \end{equation}$

(2.2)

where the function $p$ is analytic in $\mathfrak{D}$ with $p(0) = 1.$ Also consider

$\begin{equation} \frac{g\left( z\right) }{z^{p}} = \sqrt{1+w\left( z\right) }. \end{equation}$

(2.3)

Now to prove our result we will only require to prove that $\left \vert w\left(z\right) \right \vert < 1.$ Logarithmically differentiating $\left(2.3\right)$ and then using $\left(2.2\right),$ we get

$\begin{equation*} p\left( z\right) = 1+\frac{\alpha zw^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{2p\sqrt{ 1+w\left( z\right) }}+\alpha \sqrt{1+w\left( z\right) }, \end{equation*}$

and so

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left \vert \frac{p\left( z\right) -1}{A-Bp\left( z\right) }\right \vert & = &\left \vert \frac{\frac{\alpha zw^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{2p\sqrt{ 1+w\left( z\right) }}+\alpha \sqrt{1+w\left( z\right) }}{A-B\left( 1+\frac{ \alpha zw^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{2p\sqrt{1+w\left( z\right) }}+\alpha \sqrt{1+w\left( z\right) }\right) }\right \vert \\ & = &\left \vert \frac{\alpha zw^{\prime }\left( z\right) +2p\alpha \left( 1+w\left( z\right) \right) }{2p\left( A-B\right) \sqrt{1+w\left( z\right) } -B\left( \alpha zw^{\prime }\left( z\right) +2p\alpha \left( 1+w\left( z\right) \right) \right) }\right \vert . \end{eqnarray*}$

Now, we suppose that a point $z_{0}\in \mathfrak{D}$ occurs such that

$\begin{equation*} \underset{\left \vert z\right \vert \leq \left \vert z_{0}\right \vert }{ \max }\left \vert w\left( z\right) \right \vert = \left \vert w\left( z_{0}\right) \right \vert = 1. \end{equation*}$

Also by Lemma 1.1, a number $m\geq 1$ exists with $z_{0}w^{\prime }\left(z_{0}\right) = mw\left(z_{0}\right)$ . In addition, we also suppose that $w\left(z_{0}\right) = e^{i\theta }$ for $\theta \in \left[ -\pi, \pi \right].$ Then we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left \vert \frac{p\left( z_{0}\right) -1}{A-Bp\left( z_{0}\right) }\right \vert & = &\left \vert \frac{\alpha mw\left( z_{0}\right) -2p\alpha \left( 1+w\left( z_{0}\right) \right) }{2p\left( A-B\right) \sqrt{1+w\left( z_{0}\right) }-B\left( \alpha mw\left( z_{0}\right) +2p\alpha \left( 1+w\left( z_{0}\right) \right) \right) }\right \vert , \\ &\geq &\frac{\left \vert \alpha \right \vert m-2p\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left( \left \vert 1+e^{i\theta }\right \vert \right) }{2p\left( A-B\right) \sqrt{\left \vert 1+e^{i\theta }\right \vert }+\left \vert B\right \vert \left( \left \vert \alpha \right \vert m+2p\alpha \left \vert 1+e^{i\theta }\right \vert \right) }, \\ &\geq &\frac{\left \vert \alpha \right \vert m-4p\left \vert \alpha \right \vert }{2^{\frac{3}{2}}p\left( A-B\right) +\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left( m+4p\right) }. \end{eqnarray*}$

Now if

$\begin{equation*} \phi \left( m\right) = \frac{\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left( m-4p\right) }{2^{\frac{3}{2}}p\left( A-B\right) +\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left( m+4p\right) }, \end{equation*}$

then

$\begin{equation*} \phi ^{\prime }\left( m\right) = \frac{2^{\frac{3}{2}}p\left( A-B\right) \left \vert \alpha \right \vert +8\left \vert \alpha \right \vert ^{2}p\left \vert B\right \vert }{\left( 2^{\frac{3}{2}}p\left( A-B\right) +\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left( m+4p\right) \right) ^{2} } \gt 0, \end{equation*}$

which illustrates that the function $\phi \left(m\right)$ is increasing and hence $\phi \left(m\right) \geq \phi \left(1\right)$ for $m\geq 1,$ so

$\begin{equation*} \left \vert \frac{p\left( z_{0}\right) -1}{A-Bp\left( z_{0}\right) }\right \vert \geq \frac{\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left( 1-4p\right) }{2^{ \frac{3}{2}}p\left( A-B\right) +\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left( 1+4p\right) }. \end{equation*}$

Now, by using $\left(2.1\right),$ we have

$\begin{equation*} \left \vert \frac{p\left( z_{0}\right) -1}{A-Bp\left( z_{0}\right) }\right \vert \geq 1 \end{equation*}$

which contradicts the fact that $\begin{array}{c} p\left(z\right) \prec \frac{1+Az}{1+Bz}. \end{array}$ Thus $\left \vert w\left(z\right) \right \vert < 1$ and so we get the desired result.

Taking $g\left(z\right) = \frac{z^{p+1}f^{\prime }\left(z\right) }{pf(z)}$ in the last result, we obtain the following Corollary:

2.2. Corollary

Let $f\in \mathcal{A}_{p}$ and satisfying

$\begin{equation} 1+\frac{\alpha zf^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{p^{2}f\left( z\right) }\left( p+1+\frac{zf^{\prime \prime }\left( z\right) }{f^{\prime }\left( z\right) }- \frac{zf^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{f\left( z\right) }\right) \prec \frac{ 1+Az}{1+Bz}, \end{equation}$

(2.4)

with the condition on $\alpha$ is

$\begin{equation*} \left \vert \alpha \right \vert \geq \frac{2^{\frac{3}{2}}p\left( A-B\right) }{1-\left \vert B\right \vert -4p\left( 1+\left \vert B\right \vert \right) } . \end{equation*}$

Then $f\in \mathcal{SL}_{p}^{\ast }.$

2.3. Theorem

If $g\in \mathcal{A}_{p}$ such that

$\begin{equation} 1+\frac{\alpha }{p}\frac{zg^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{g\left( z\right) } \prec \frac{1+Az}{1+Bz}, \end{equation}$

(2.5)

with

$\begin{equation} \left \vert \alpha \right \vert \geq \frac{8p\left( A-B\right) }{1-\left \vert B\right \vert -4p\left( 1+\left \vert B\right \vert \right) }, \end{equation}$

(2.6)

then

$\begin{equation*} \frac{g\left( z\right) }{z^{p}}\prec \sqrt{1+z}. \end{equation*}$

Proof

Let us choose a function $p$ by

$\begin{equation*} p\left( z\right) = 1+\alpha \frac{zg^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{pg\left( z\right) }, \end{equation*}$

in such a way that $p$ is analytic in $\mathfrak{D}$ with $p(0) = 1.$ Also consider

$\begin{equation*} \frac{g\left( z\right) }{z^{p}} = \sqrt{1+w\left( z\right) }. \end{equation*}$

Using some simple calculations, we obtain

$\begin{equation*} p\left( z\right) = 1+\frac{\alpha zw^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{2p\left( 1+w\left( z\right) \right) }+\alpha , \end{equation*}$

and so

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left \vert \frac{p\left( z\right) -1}{A-Bp\left( z\right) }\right \vert & = &\left \vert \frac{\frac{\alpha zw^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{2p\left( 1+w\left( z\right) \right) }+\alpha }{A-B\left( 1+\frac{\alpha zw^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{2p\left( 1+w\left( z\right) \right) }+\alpha \right) } \right \vert \\ & = &\left \vert \frac{\alpha zw^{\prime }\left( z\right) +2p\alpha \left( 1+w\left( z\right) \right) }{2p\left( A-B\right) \left( 1+w\left( z\right) \right) -B\left( \alpha zw^{\prime }\left( z\right) +2p\alpha \left( 1+w\left( z\right) \right) \right) }\right \vert . \end{eqnarray*}$

Let a point $z_{0}\in \mathfrak{D}$ exists in such a way

Then, by virtue of Lemma 1.1, a number $m\geq 1$ occurs such that $\ z_{0}w^{\prime }\left(z_{0}\right) = mw\left(z_{0}\right)$ . In addition, we set $w\left(z_{0}\right) = e^{i\theta },$ so we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left \vert \frac{p\left( z_{0}\right) -1}{A-Bp\left( z_{0}\right) }\right \vert & = &\left \vert \frac{\alpha mw\left( z_{0}\right) +2p\alpha \left( 1+w\left( z_{0}\right) \right) }{2p\left( A-B\right) \left( 1+w\left( z_{0}\right) \right) -B\left( \alpha mw\left( z_{0}\right) +2p\alpha \left( 1+w\left( z_{0}\right) \right) \right) }\right \vert , \\ &\geq &\frac{\left \vert \alpha \right \vert m-2p\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left \vert 1+e^{i\theta }\right \vert }{2\left( A-B\right) \left \vert 1+e^{i\theta }\right \vert +\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert m+2p\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left \vert 1+e^{i\theta }\right \vert }, \\ & = &\frac{\left \vert \alpha \right \vert m-2p\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \sqrt{2+2\cos \theta }}{2\left( 2\left( A-B\right) +\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert \right) p\sqrt{2+2\cos \theta }+\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert m}, \\ &\geq &\frac{\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left( m-4p\right) }{4p\left( 2\left( A-B\right) +\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert \right) +\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert m}. \end{eqnarray*}$

Now let

$\begin{equation*} \phi \left( m\right) = \frac{\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left( m-4p\right) }{4p\left( 2\left( A-B\right) +\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert \right) +\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert m}, \end{equation*}$

it implies

$\begin{equation*} \phi ^{\prime }\left( m\right) = \frac{\left \vert \alpha \right \vert 8p\left( \left( A-B\right) +\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left \vert B\right \vert \right) }{\left( 4p\left( 2\left( A-B\right) +\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert \right) +\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert m\right) ^{2}} \gt 0, \end{equation*}$

which illustrates that the function $\phi \left(m\right)$ is increasing and so $\phi \left(m\right) \geq \phi \left(1\right)$ for $m\geq 1,$ hence

$\begin{equation*} \left \vert \frac{p\left( z_{0}\right) -1}{A-Bp\left( z_{0}\right) }\right \vert \geq \frac{\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left( 1-4p\right) }{ 4p\left( 2\left( A-B\right) +\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert \right) +\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert }. \end{equation*}$

Now, by using $\left(2.6\right),$ we have

$\begin{equation*} \left \vert \frac{p\left( z_{0}\right) -1}{A-Bp\left( z_{0}\right) }\right \vert \geq 1, \end{equation*}$

which contradicts $\left(2.5\right).$ Thus $\left \vert w\left(z\right) \right \vert < 1$ and so the desired proof is completed.

Putting $g\left(z\right) = \frac{z^{p+1}f^{\prime }\left(z\right) }{pf(z)}$ in last Theorem, we get the following Corollary:

2.4. Corollary

If $f\in \mathcal{A}_{p}$ and satisfying

$\begin{equation*} 1+\frac{\alpha }{p}\left( p+1+\frac{zf^{\prime \prime }\left( z\right) }{ f^{\prime }\left( z\right) }-\frac{zf^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{f\left( z\right) }\right) \prec \frac{1+Az}{1+Bz}, \end{equation*}$

with

$\begin{equation*} \left \vert \alpha \right \vert \geq \frac{8p\left( A-B\right) }{1-\left \vert B\right \vert -4p\left( 1+\left \vert B\right \vert \right) }, \end{equation*}$

then $f\in \mathcal{SL}_{p}^{\ast }.$

2.5. Theorem

If $g\in \mathcal{A}_{p}$ and satisfy the subordination relation

$\begin{equation} 1+\alpha \frac{z^{1-p}g^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{p\left( g\left( z\right) \right) ^{2}}\prec \frac{1+Az}{1+Bz}, \end{equation}$

(2.7)

with the condition on $\alpha$

$\begin{equation} \left \vert \alpha \right \vert \geq \frac{2^{\frac{5}{2}}p\left( A-B\right) }{1-\left \vert B\right \vert -4p\left( 1+\left \vert B\right \vert \right) } \end{equation}$

(2.8)

is true, then

$\begin{equation*} \frac{g\left( z\right) }{z^{p}}\prec \sqrt{1+z}. \end{equation*}$

Proof

Let us define a function

$\begin{equation*} p\left( z\right) = 1+\alpha \frac{z^{1-p}g^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{p\left( g\left( z\right) \right) ^{2}}. \end{equation*}$

Then $p$ is analytic in $\mathfrak{D}$ with $p(0) = 1.$ Also let us consider

$\begin{equation*} \frac{g\left( z\right) }{z^{p}} = \sqrt{1+w\left( z\right) }. \end{equation*}$

Using some simplification, we obtain

$\begin{equation*} p\left( z\right) = 1+\frac{\alpha zw^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{2p\left( 1+w\left( z\right) \right) ^{\frac{3}{2}}}+\frac{\alpha }{\sqrt{1+w\left( z\right) }}, \end{equation*}$

and so

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left \vert \frac{p\left( z\right) -1}{A-Bp\left( z\right) }\right \vert & = &\left \vert \frac{\frac{\alpha zw^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{2p\left( 1+w\left( z\right) \right) ^{\frac{3}{2}}}+\frac{\alpha }{\sqrt{1+w\left( z\right) }}}{A-B\left( 1+\frac{\alpha zw^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{2p\left( 1+w\left( z\right) \right) ^{\frac{3}{2}}}+\frac{\alpha }{\sqrt{1+w\left( z\right) }}\right) }\right \vert \\ & = &\left \vert \frac{\alpha zw^{\prime }\left( z\right) +2p\alpha \left( 1+w\left( z\right) \right) }{2p\left( A-B\right) \left( 1+w\left( z\right) \right) ^{\frac{3}{2}}-B\alpha zw^{\prime }\left( z\right) -2p\alpha B\left( 1+w\left( z\right) \right) }\right \vert . \end{eqnarray*}$

Let us choose a point $z_{0}\in \mathfrak{D}$ such a way that

Then, by the consequences of Lemma 1.1, a number $m\geq 1$ occurs such that $z_{0}w^{\prime }\left(z_{0}\right) = mw\left(z_{0}\right)$ and also put $w\left(z_{0}\right) = e^{i\theta },$ for $\theta \in \left[ -\pi, \pi \right],$ we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left \vert \frac{p\left( z_{0}\right) -1}{A-Bp\left( z_{0}\right) }\right \vert & = &\left \vert \frac{\alpha mw\left( z_{0}\right) +2p\alpha \left( 1+w\left( z_{0}\right) \right) }{2p\left( A-B\right) \left( 1+w\left( z_{0}\right) \right) ^{\frac{3}{2}}-B\alpha mw\left( z_{0}\right) -2p\alpha B\left( 1+w\left( z_{0}\right) \right) }\right \vert , \\ &\geq &\frac{\left \vert \alpha \right \vert m-2p\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left \vert 1+e^{i\theta }\right \vert }{2p\left( A-B\right) \left \vert 1+e^{i\theta }\right \vert ^{\frac{3}{2}}+\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert m+2p\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert 1+e^{i\theta }\right \vert }, \\ & = &\frac{\left \vert \alpha \right \vert m-4p\left \vert \alpha \right \vert }{2^{\frac{5}{2}}p\left( A-B\right) +\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert m+4p\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left \vert B\right \vert }, \\ &\geq &\frac{\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left( m-4p\right) }{2^{\frac{5 }{2}}p\left( A-B\right) +\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert m+4p\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left \vert B\right \vert } = \phi \left( m\right) \text{ (say).} \end{eqnarray*}$

Then

$\begin{equation*} \phi ^{\prime }\left( m\right) = \frac{2^{\frac{5}{2}}p\left( A-B\right) +8\left \vert \alpha \right \vert ^{2}\left \vert B\right \vert p}{\left( 2^{ \frac{5}{2}}p\left( A-B\right) +B\left \vert \alpha \right \vert m+4p\left \vert \alpha \right \vert B\right) ^{2}} \gt 0, \end{equation*}$

which demonstrates that the function $\phi \left(m\right)$ is increasing and thus $\phi \left(m\right) \geq \phi \left(1\right)$ for $m\geq 1,$ hence

$\begin{equation*} \left \vert \frac{p\left( z_{0}\right) -1}{A-Bp\left( z_{0}\right) }\right \vert \geq \frac{\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left( 1-4p\right) }{2^{ \frac{5}{2}}p\left( A-B\right) +\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert +4p\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left \vert B\right \vert }. \end{equation*}$

Now, using $\left(2.8\right),$ we have

$\begin{equation*} \left \vert \frac{p\left( z_{0}\right) -1}{A-Bp\left( z_{0}\right) }\right \vert \geq 1, \end{equation*}$

which contradicts $\left(2.7\right)$ . Thus $\left \vert w\left(z\right) \right \vert < 1$ and so we get the required proof.

If we set $g\left(z\right) = \frac{z^{p+1}f^{\prime }\left(z\right) }{pf(z)}$ in last theorem, we easily have the following Corollary:

2.6. Corollary

Assume that

$\begin{equation*} \left \vert \alpha \right \vert \geq \frac{2^{\frac{5}{2}}p\left( A-B\right) }{1-\left \vert B\right \vert -4p\left( 1+\left \vert B\right \vert \right) } , \end{equation*}$

and if $f\in \mathcal{A}_{p}$ satisfy

$\begin{equation*} 1+\frac{\alpha f\left( z\right) }{z^{2p+1}f^{\prime }\left( z\right) }\left( p+1+\frac{zf^{\prime \prime }\left( z\right) }{f^{\prime }\left( z\right) }- \frac{zf^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{f\left( z\right) }\right) \prec \frac{ 1+Az}{1+Bz}, \end{equation*}$

then $f\in \mathcal{SL}_{p}^{\ast }.$

2.7. Theorem

If $g\in \mathcal{A}_{p}$ satisfy the subordination

$\begin{equation*} 1+\alpha \frac{z^{1-2p}g^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{p\left( g\left( z\right) \right) ^{3}}\prec \frac{1+Az}{1+Bz}, \end{equation*}$

with restriction on $\alpha$ is

$\begin{equation} \left \vert \alpha \right \vert \geq \frac{8p\left( A-B\right) }{1-\left \vert B\right \vert -4p\left( 1+\left \vert B\right \vert \right) }. \end{equation}$

(2.9)

then

$\begin{equation*} \frac{g\left( z\right) }{z^{p}}\prec \sqrt{1+z}. \end{equation*}$

Proof. Let us define a function

$\begin{equation*} p\left( z\right) = 1+\alpha \frac{z^{1-2p}g^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{ p\left( g\left( z\right) \right) ^{3}}, \end{equation*}$

where $p$ is analytic in $\mathfrak{D}$ with $p(0)-1 = 0.$ Also let

$\begin{equation*} \frac{g\left( z\right) }{z^{p}} = \sqrt{1+w\left( z\right) }. \end{equation*}$

Using some simple calculations, we obtain

$\begin{equation*} p\left( z\right) = 1+\frac{\alpha zw^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{2p\left( 1+w\left( z\right) \right) ^{2}}+\frac{\alpha }{1+w\left( z\right) }, \end{equation*}$

and so

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left \vert \frac{p\left( z\right) -1}{A-Bp\left( z\right) }\right \vert & = &\left \vert \frac{\frac{\alpha zw^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{2p\left( 1+w\left( z\right) \right) ^{2}}+\frac{\alpha }{1+w\left( z\right) }}{ A-B\left( 1+\frac{\alpha zw^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{2p\left( 1+w\left( z\right) \right) ^{2}}+\frac{\alpha }{1+w\left( z\right) }\right) }\right \vert \\ & = &\left \vert \frac{\alpha zw^{\prime }\left( z\right) +2p\alpha \left( 1+w\left( z\right) \right) }{2p\left( A-B\right) \left( 1+w\left( z\right) \right) ^{2}-B\alpha zw^{\prime }\left( z\right) -2p\alpha B\left( 1+w\left( z\right) \right) }\right \vert . \end{eqnarray*}$

Let us pick a point $z_{0}\in \mathfrak{D}$ in such a way that

Then, by using Lemma 1.1 $,$ a number $m\geq 1$ exists such that $z_{0}w^{\prime }\left(z_{0}\right) = mw\left(z_{0}\right) \$ and put $w\left(z_{0}\right) = e^{i\theta },$ for $\theta \in \left[ -\pi, \pi \right]$ , we have

$\begin{eqnarray*} \left \vert \frac{p\left( z_{0}\right) -1}{A-Bp\left( z_{0}\right) }\right \vert & = &\left \vert \frac{\alpha mw\left( z_{0}\right) +2p\alpha \left( 1+w\left( z_{0}\right) \right) }{2p\left( A-B\right) \left( 1+w\left( z_{0}\right) \right) ^{2}-B\alpha mw\left( z_{0}\right) -2p\alpha B\left( 1+w\left( z_{0}\right) \right) }\right \vert \\ &\geq &\frac{\left \vert \alpha \right \vert m-2p\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left \vert 1+e^{i\theta }\right \vert }{2p\left( A-B\right) \left \vert 1+e^{i\theta }\right \vert ^{2}+\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert m+2p\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert 1+e^{i\theta }\right \vert } \\ & = &\frac{\left \vert \alpha \right \vert m-2p\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \sqrt{2+2\cos \theta }}{2p\left( A-B\right) \left( \sqrt{2+2\cos \theta } \right) ^{2}+\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert m+2p\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left \vert B\right \vert \sqrt{2+2\cos \theta }} \\ &\geq &\frac{\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left( m-4p\right) }{8p\left( A-B\right) +\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert m+4p\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left \vert B\right \vert }, \end{eqnarray*}$

Now let

$\begin{equation*} \phi \left( m\right) = \frac{\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left( m-4p\right) }{8p\left( A-B\right) +\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert m+4p\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left \vert B\right \vert }, \end{equation*}$

then

$\begin{equation*} \phi ^{\prime }\left( m\right) = \frac{8p\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left( A-B\right) +8\left \vert \alpha \right \vert ^{2}\left \vert B\right \vert p}{\left( 8p\left( A-B\right) +\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert m+4p\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left \vert B\right \vert \right) ^{2}} \gt 0 \end{equation*}$

which shows that $\phi \left(m\right)$ is an increasing function and hence it will have its minimum value at $m = 1$ , so

$\begin{equation*} \left \vert \frac{p\left( z_{0}\right) -1}{A-Bp\left( z_{0}\right) }\right \vert \geq \frac{\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left( 1-4p\right) }{ 8p\left( A-B\right) +\left \vert B\right \vert \left \vert \alpha \right \vert +4p\left \vert \alpha \right \vert \left \vert B\right \vert }. \end{equation*}$

Using $\left(2.9\right),$ we easily obtain

$\begin{equation*} \left \vert \frac{p\left( z_{0}\right) -1}{A-Bp\left( z_{0}\right) }\right \vert \geq 1, \end{equation*}$

which is a contradiction to the fact that $p\left(z\right) \prec \frac{1+Az }{1+Bz},$ and so $\left \vert w\left(z\right) \right \vert < 1.$ Hence we get the desired result.

If we put $g\left(z\right) = \frac{z^{p+1}f^{\prime }\left(z\right) }{pf(z)}$ in last Theorem, we achieve the following result:

2.8. Corollary

If $f\in \mathcal{A}_{p}$ and satisfy the condition

$\begin{equation*} \left \vert \alpha \right \vert \geq \frac{8p\left( A-B\right) }{1-\left \vert B\right \vert -4p\left( 1+\left \vert B\right \vert \right) }, \end{equation*}$

and

$\begin{equation*} 1+\alpha \frac{p\left( f\left( z\right) \right) ^{2}}{z^{3p+2}\left( f^{\prime }\left( z\right) \right) ^{2}}\left( p+1+\frac{zf^{\prime \prime }\left( z\right) }{f^{\prime }\left( z\right) }-\frac{zf^{\prime }\left( z\right) }{f\left( z\right) }\right) \prec \frac{1+Az}{1+Bz}, \end{equation*}$

then $f\in \mathcal{SL}_{p}^{\ast }.$

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest in this paper.

References

[1]	Faiman D, Feuermann D, Ibbetson P, et al. (1992) A multipyranometer instrument for obtaining the solar beam and diffuse components, and the irradiance on inclined planes. Sol Energy 48: 253-259. doi: 10.1016/0038-092X(92)90099-V
[2]	Curtis P (1993) An analysis of methods for deriving the constituent insolation components from multipyranometer array measurements. J Sol Energy Eng 115: 11-21. doi: 10.1115/1.2930018
[3]	Hamalainen M, Nurkkanen P, Slaen T (1985) A multisensory pyranometer for determination of the direct component and angular distribution of solar radiation. Sol Energy 35: 511-525. doi: 10.1016/0038-092X(85)90120-3
[4]	Appelbaum J, Bergshtein O (1987) Solar radiation distribution Sensor. Sol Energy 39: 1-10. doi: 10.1016/S0038-092X(87)80046-4
[5]	Imamura M, Helm P (1992) A novel method of monitoring global normal irradiance with a stationary sensor. Int J Sol Energy 11: 211-217. doi: 10.1080/01425919208909741
[6]	Heisterkamp N, Orthjohann E, Voss J (1994) A multi-purpose irradiance measuring system. 12^th European photovoltaic solar Energy conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlans.
[7]	Appelbaum J, Weiss Y (1999) The packing of circles on a hemisphere. Meas Sci Technol 10: 1015-1019. doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/10/11/307
[8]	Bany J, Appelbaum J (1987) The effect of shading on the design of a field of solar collectors. Sol Cells 20: 201-228. doi: 10.1016/0379-6787(87)90029-9
[9]	Temp RC, Coulson KL (1977) Solar radiation incident upon slopes of different orientations. Sol Energy 19: 179-184. doi: 10.1016/0038-092X(77)90056-1
[10]	Klucher TM (1979) Evaluation of models to predict insolation on tilted surfaces. Sol Energy 23: 111-114.
[11]	Perez R, Ineichen P, Seal P, et al. (1990) Modeling daylight availability and irradiance componens from direct and global irradiance. Sol Energy 44: 271-289. doi: 10.1016/0038-092X(90)90055-H

This article has been cited by:

1.	Gurmeet Singh Gahir, Surendrapal Singh Matharu, D.A. Joshi, N.B. Ibrahim, D.M. Sangeetha, Characterization of Non-Edible Oil for Development of Stable Industrial Lubricant, 2023, 405, 2267-1242, 04045, 10.1051/e3sconf/202340504045
2.	Thuy T. Cao, Xuan-Nang Ho, Vinh Nguyen Duy, Biodiesel from Jatropha curcas seed oil: Status, perspectives, and challenges in Southeast Asia, 2023, 1556-5068, 10.2139/ssrn.4589941

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)