Underwater routing protocols: Analysis of link selection challenges

Shahzad Ashraf; Arshad Ahmad; Adnan Yahya; Tauqeer Ahmed; Shahzad Ashraf; Arshad Ahmad; Adnan Yahya; Tauqeer Ahmed

doi:10.3934/ElectrEng.2020.3.234

AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering

2020, Volume 4, Issue 3: 234-248. doi: 10.3934/ElectrEng.2020.3.234

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Underwater routing protocols: Analysis of link selection challenges

1.
College of Internet of Things Engineering, Hohai University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
2.
Department of Computer Science, University of Swabi, Anbar, Pakistan
3.
Dow University of Health Sciences Karachi Pakistan

Received: 10 April 2020 Accepted: 08 June 2020 Published: 19 June 2020

The sensor nodes deployed in underwater environment has different routing mechanism in contrast to the terrestrial network. Getting underwater data on pollution detection, control of the ecosystem, marine mining, catastrophe avoidance and strategic surveillance thereby demands smooth packet transmission which can only be possible through a stable and astute communication link between sensor nodes. Therefore, selecting best link between source and destination node is a key challenge. The meticulous research has been conducted to search out the best link selection mechanism of bodacious underwater routing protocol EnOR, SURS‐PES and USPF; and recommended the protocol that offers a shrewd communication link. The performance has been evaluated through NS2 simulation for packet delivery ratio, end-to-end delay, network lifespan and network energy consumption.
- packet forwarding,
- relay node,
- network throughput,
- underwater routing
Citation: Shahzad Ashraf, Arshad Ahmad, Adnan Yahya, Tauqeer Ahmed. Underwater routing protocols: Analysis of link selection challenges[J]. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2020, 4(3): 234-248. doi: 10.3934/ElectrEng.2020.3.234

Related Papers:

Abstract

The sensor nodes deployed in underwater environment has different routing mechanism in contrast to the terrestrial network. Getting underwater data on pollution detection, control of the ecosystem, marine mining, catastrophe avoidance and strategic surveillance thereby demands smooth packet transmission which can only be possible through a stable and astute communication link between sensor nodes. Therefore, selecting best link between source and destination node is a key challenge. The meticulous research has been conducted to search out the best link selection mechanism of bodacious underwater routing protocol EnOR, SURS‐PES and USPF; and recommended the protocol that offers a shrewd communication link. The performance has been evaluated through NS2 simulation for packet delivery ratio, end-to-end delay, network lifespan and network energy consumption.

References

[1]	Awan KM, Shah PA, Iqbal K, et al. (2019) Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks: A Review of Recent Issues and Challenges. Wirel Commun Mob Comput 2019: 1-20.
[2]	Zenia NZ, Aseeri M, Ahmed MR, et al. (2016) Energy-efficiency and reliability in MAC and routing protocols for underwater wireless sensor network: A survey. J Netw Comput Appl 71: 72-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2016.06.005
[3]	Ashraf S, Raza A, Aslam Z, et al. (2020) Underwater Resurrection Routing Synergy using Astucious Energy Pods. J Robot Control JRC 1: 173-184.
[4]	Tilwari V, Maheswar R, Jayarajan P, et al. (2020) MCLMR: A Multicriteria Based Multipath Routing in the Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 112: 2461-2483. doi: 10.1007/s11277-020-07159-8
[5]	Ashraf S, Saleem S, Ahmed T, et al. Multi-biometric Sustainable approach for human Appellative. Trends Comput Sci Inf Technol 5: 001-007.
[6]	Ashraf S, Ahmed T (2020) Underwater Routing Protocols Analysis of Intrepid Link Selection Mechanism, Challenges and Strategies. Int J Sci Res Comput Sci Eng 8: 1-9.
[7]	Somani AK, Shekhawat RS, Mundra A, et al. (2020) Smart Systems and IoT: Innovations in Computing: Proceeding of SSIC 2019. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
[8]	Ullah I, Chen J, Su X, et al. (2019) Localization and Detection of Targets in Underwater Wireless Sensor Using Distance and Angle Based Algorithms. IEEE Access 7: 45693-45704. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2909133
[9]	Awan KM, Shah PA, Iqbal K, et al. (2019) Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks: A Review of Recent Issues and Challenges. Wirel Commun Mob Comput 2019: 1-20.
[10]	Ashraf S, Saleem S, Ahmed T, Sagacious Communication Link Selection Mechanism for Underwater Wireless Sensors Network. Int J Wirel Microw Technol 10: 12-25.
[11]	Ullah I, Liu Y, Su X, et al. (2019) Efficient and Accurate Target Localization in Underwater Environment. IEEE Access 7: 101415-101426. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2930735
[12]	JINGGUO Q, ZILONG Z, YUHUAN C, et al. (2019) Research and Application of Multi-Node Communication and Energy Consumption Prediction Control in Underwater Acoustic Network. IEEE Access 7: 41220-41229. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2907376
[13]	Safkhani M (2018) Cryptanalysis of R2AP an Ultralightweight Authentication Protocol for RFID. J Electr Comput Eng Innov 6: 107-114.
[14]	Ashraf S, Saleem S, Chohan AH, et al. (2020) Challenging strategic trends in green supply chain management. Int J Res Eng Appl Sci JREAS 5: 71-74.
[15]	Guleria K and Verma AK (2019) Comprehensive review for energy efficient hierarchical routing protocols on wireless sensor networks. Wirel Netw 25: 1159-1183. doi: 10.1007/s11276-018-1696-1
[16]	Yang H, Zhou Y, Hu YH, et al. (2018) Cross-Layer Design for Network Lifetime Maximization in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 1-6
[17]	Coutinho RWL, Boukerche A, Vieira LFM, et al. (2017) Performance modeling and analysis of void-handling methodologies in underwater wireless sensor networks. Comput Netw 126: 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2017.06.027
[18]	Grant RM (1996) Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration. Organ Sci 7: 375-387. doi: 10.1287/orsc.7.4.375
[19]	Cao J, Dou J, Dong S (2015) Balance Transmission Mechanism in Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 11: 429340. doi: 10.1155/2015/429340
[20]	Ashraf S, Ahmed T, Saleem S, et al. (2020) Diverging Mysterious in Green Supply Chain Management. Orient J Comput Sci Technology 12: 34-38.
[21]	Ashraf S, Arfeen ZA, Khan MA, et al. (2020) SLM-OJ: Surrogate Learning Mechanism during Outbreak Juncture. Int J Mod Trends Sci Technol 6: 162-167.
[22]	Ullah I, Shen Y, Su X, et al. (2019) A Localization Based on Unscented Kalman Filter and Particle Filter Localization Algorithms. IEEE Access.
[23]	Balsamo S, Marin A, Vicario E (2018) New Frontiers in Quantitative Methods in Informatics. Springer International publishig.
[24]	Sharma N, Chakrabarti A, Balas VE (2019) Data Management, Analytics and Innovation. Proceedings of ICDMAI 2019.
[25]	Wahid A, Lee S, Jeong HJ, et al. (2011) EEDBR: Energy-Efficient Depth-Based Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. Advanced Computer Science and Information Technology, 223-234. Springer.
[26]	Ashraf S, Yahya A, Khan MA, Culminate coverage for sensor network through Bodacious-instance Mechanism. Manag J Wirel Commun Netw 8: 1-7.
[27]	Ghoreyshi SM, Shahrabi A, Boutaleb T (2017) Void-Handling Techniques for Routing Protocols in Underwater Sensor Networks: Survey and Challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 19: 800-827. doi: 10.1109/COMST.2017.2657881
[28]	Ashraf S and Ahmed T, Machine Learning Shrewd Approach For An Imbalanced Dataset Conversion Samples. J Engneering Technol 10: 7-25.
[29]	Ashraf S, Muhammad D, Khan MA, et al. Fuzzy based efficient Cosmetology Paradigm. Int J Multidiscip Curr Res 8: 421-425.
[30]	Coutinho RWL, Boukerche A, Vieira LFM, et al. (2016) Geographic and Opportunistic Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks. IEEE Trans Comput 65: 548-561. doi: 10.1109/TC.2015.2423677
[31]	Ashraf S, Ahmed T, Raza A, et al. (2020) Design of Shrewd Underwater Routing Synergy Using Porous Energy Shells. Smart Cities 3: 74-92. doi: 10.3390/smartcities3010005
[32]	Ashraf S, Gao M, Mingchen Z, et al. (2020) USPF: Underwater Shrewd Packet Flooding Mechanism through Surrogate Holding Time. Wirel Commun Mob Comput 2020: 1-12.
[33]	Ashraf S, Gao M, Chen Z, et al. (2017) Efficient Node Monitoring Mechanism in WSN using Contikimac Protocol. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 8: 429-439.

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)