
Citation: Christian M. Julien, Alain Mauger. In situ Raman analyses of electrode materials for Li-ion batteries[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(4): 650-698. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.4.650
[1] | Deval V. Jansari, Reza K. Amineh . A two-element antenna array for compact portable MIMO-UWB communication systems. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2019, 3(3): 224-232. doi: 10.3934/ElectrEng.2019.3.224 |
[2] | Vasudevan Karuppiah, UmaMaheswari Gurusamy . Compact EBG structure for ground bounce noise suppression in high-speed digital systems. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2022, 6(2): 124-143. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2022008 |
[3] | Nazim F. Habbani, Sharief F. Babikir . Study of single-electron tunneling oscillations using monte-carlo based modeling algorithms to a capacitive slanted two-dimensional array of tunnel junctions. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2021, 5(1): 55-67. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2021004 |
[4] | M. Naveen Kumar, M. Venkata Narayana, Govardhani Immadi, P. Satyanarayana, Ambati Navya . Analysis of a low-profile, dual band patch antenna for wireless applications. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2023, 7(2): 171-186. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2023010 |
[5] | José M. Campos-Salazar, Juan L. Aguayo-Lazcano, Roya Rafiezadeh . Non-ideal two-level battery charger—modeling and simulation. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2025, 9(1): 60-80. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2025004 |
[6] | Ambati. Navya, Govardhani. Immadi, Madhavareddy. Venkata Narayana . Flexible ku/k band frequency reconfigurable bandpass filter. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2022, 6(1): 16-28. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2022002 |
[7] | Manisha R. Bansode, Surendra S. Rathod . A bandwidth enhanced multilayer electromagnetic bandgap structure to reduce the simultaneous switching noise. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2023, 7(4): 406-420. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2023021 |
[8] | Guennadi A. Kouzaev . Microwave-assisted heating in a novel thin film-liquid spinning coaxial reactor. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2024, 8(4): 488-507. doi: 10.3934/electreng.2024023 |
[9] | Efthymios N. Lallas . A survey on key roles of optical switching and labeling technologies on big data traffic of Data Centers and HPC environments. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2019, 3(3): 233-256. doi: 10.3934/ElectrEng.2019.3.233 |
[10] | Nazim F. Habbani, Sharief F. Babikir . Coherence of oscillations generated by single-electronic two-dimensional arrays of tunnel junctions. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2020, 4(2): 188-199. doi: 10.3934/ElectrEng.2020.2.188 |
Thanks to high electrical-to-optical power conversion efficiency, small sizes, as well as suitability for various forms of integration at wavelengths precisely determined in a technological process, laser diodes (LDs) are one of the key elements in optoelectronics. Despite the known advantages and the wide range of applications, some areas are not available for LD use, however, due to poor quality of the emitted beam. In wide-stripe (WS) gain-guided constructions typical for high-power LDs, lateral (in the junction plane) distributions of the optical field in the cavity and then the emitted beam are unstable in time and as a function of a drive current. This instability of the combination of a WS-multimode structure and filamentation (originated from micro-nonuniformities of an active region) is a result of several dynamically interacting, nonlinear effects, such as gain saturation, thermal index guiding and free-carrier index antiguiding. In continuous operation (CW) strengthened thermal index guiding causes additional field destabilization, which is seen as uncontrollable variations of the emitted beam distribution in the far-field with the drive current changes.
Improvement of the beam quality in the junction plane has been of interest for a long time – there are numerous theoretical and experimental investigations aimed at explaining the mechanisms and mastering the problem [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. The concepts of WS waveguide modification leading to 'ordering' light-wave propagation, which in turn would improve beam stability, can be shortly summarized as follows. First, the 'natural' idea to suppress filamentation by replacing the wide-stripe with a series of narrow nearby active stripes led to the phase-locked array (PLA) design [11,12,13,14,15,16], sometimes termed as photonic crystals [17]. Another concept is to ensure a lateral optical field distribution in the wide stripe stable enough to overcome the above-mentioned fluctuations. Various constructions have been proposed for this purpose, including MOPA and flared-waveguide LDs [18], spatial filtering by stripe edge modifications [19,20], 'profiling' the lateral gain and optical field distribution via a multi-stripe tailored p-contact design [21], and lateral thermal lensing reduction via 'pedestal' LD mounting (with a risk of some device's thermal resistance increase) [22,23]. Another possibility described in the literature is external beam stabilization by optical feedback or optical injection [6,24]. Predominantly, the design modifications in the junction plane are aimed at enhancement and stabilization of the fundamental lateral mode by suppression of higher-order ones [18,19,20,21,22,23,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. This is difficult when a wide laser drive current range is desirable and symptoms of beam instability still remain. A recent proposal consists in emitted beam stabilization by superposition of low- and high-order lateral modes constrained by a lateral periodicity superimposed on a wide-stripe waveguide [33]. Then, a two-dimensional periodic 'Spatial-Current-Modulated' (SCM) structure was described [34], where mutual (lateral and longitudinal) periodicity perturbations are shown to lead to beam stabilization in the wide LD's drive current range, with prevailing content of low-order modes. The mechanism of far-field (FF) and near-field (NF) distributions stabilization over the drive-current range seems not to be explained clearly enough, however.
This paper refers to the earlier presented concept of lateral periodic structure (LPS) built into an LD's WS waveguide by spatially selective techniques (ion implantation [33], chemical etching) in order to stabilize optical field distribution in the junction plane. Periodic current flow and gain profiles (as sketched in Figure 1; continuous in the longitudinal direction) prefer and stabilize high-order WS-lateral-eigen-modes of spatial distribution close to LPS, in relation to the fundamental and low-order ones (this differentiates LPS-LDs from geometrically similar PLAs where electrically separated narrow single–mode stripes are optically coupled to each other). Such stabilization over a wide range of LD's drive current and optical power in pulsed and CW operation by the LPS built into asymmetric InGaAs/AlGaAs/GaAs heterostructure by chemical etching is described here. The resulting lateral beam divergence stabilization over the LD's CW operating range is evidenced.
In the following, the design and technological issues, then mode-gain simulations in LPS-LDs and in conventional 'reference' wide-stripe devices (WS-LDs) under pulsed and CW conditions are discussed in Section 2. Then, in Section 3, in connection with the simulation results, the experimental short-pulse and CW near-field (NF) and far-field (FF) emission characteristics of high-power LPS- and WS-LDs are comparatively analyzed, indicating the stabilization effect of the LPS. Section 4 presents the conclusions.
The scheme in the plane perpendicular to the waveguiding direction (i.e. in the LD's mirror plane) of the LPS built into the asymmetric heterostructure is shown in Figure 2 together with the corresponding vertical (perpendicular to the junction plane) heterostructure refractive index profile and the calculated optical field intensity distribution of the fundamental transverse mode. The SEM photograph (Figure 3) shows such asymmetric InGaAs/AlGaAs/GaAs heterostructure designed for 970 nm (analogous to the earlier one designed for 810 nm [35]), with the LPS built in by selective wet-etching. It consists of a series of electrically conducting active stripes (of width d, numbered 1, 2…..N) interlaced with insulating trenches (of width s, Schottky isolation), both no wider than the native filament size (~6 µm [36]). The LPS period Λ = d + s. Thanks to weak optical field penetration into thin p-cladding layer (with no risk of absorption in the contact layer and metallization, as seen in the right part of Figure 2), a relatively shallow LPS is sufficient for current flow control and gain shaping in the active region. Due to lateral current spreading under the isolating stripes (s), current density minima are formed beneath their centers (as sketched in Figure 1) and the resulting lateral electronic gain modulation profile at the active layer depends on the p-cladding resistivity and on the LPS d/s ratio and etching depth. To estimate the impact of this electronic gain profile on the mode-gains of lateral eigen-modes of the LD's WS waveguide (using the Photon Design's FIMMWAWE software), the isolating trench regions (s) have been modeled as sets of five constituent vertical slices of various gain in the active layer, as illustrated in Figure 2. Arbitrarily introduced sets of electronic gain values in slices (with respect to assumed uniform electronic gain in the active stripes (d) [37]) serve to model various constructions, including both electrical and geometrical properties of p-cladding's LPS.
In a 'reference' gain-guided WS-LD structure of stripe width W (close to (N × Λ) of the LPS) and of a given electronic gain in the active region, the fundamental lateral mode (n = 0) has the highest gain, and then the calculated higher-order mode-gains gradually fall due to worsening overlap (Figure 4, plot 1). With the LD's drive current (ID) increase above the 0'th-mode threshold, enabling higher-order modes into laser operation widens the lateral FF distribution of the emitted beam (no above-threshold gain saturation in WS-LDs is assumed in the model). This 'intrinsic' FF widening is not connected with carrier-transport-related effects, such as lateral current crowding or carrier accumulation at stripe edges [7,8,9,10,23,28]).
In the case of LPS insertion into WS low-mesa, the fundamental and the lowest-order eigen-modes of WS waveguide still propagate as in a uniform medium of a gain averaged over the period (Λ). Calculated gains of higher-order modes quickly decrease, however, due to worsening spatial matching with the LPS gain distribution. Only for the 'resonant' n = N – 1 mode (and eventually for the nearest neighbors) the gain sharply increases due to spatial fitting (the best overlap). The gain ratio of the fundamental and the resonant modes Rgmod = g0mod/grez gmod depends on the LPS gain/loss profile and on the d/s ratio. This is shown in Figure 4 for exemplary gain modulation profiles (plots 2 - 4), for established through this work d/s = 6/3 [μm/μm] and N = 18. The selected parameters d and s result from earlier trials [37], they are below the native filament size and can be formed by conventional photolithography. The cumulative contact stripe width 108 μm is close to that of conventional WS LDs. For Rgmod > 1 (plots 2 - 3 in Figure 4) the lasing is expected to start with the dominant lowest-order modes, while the resonant and nearest modes can be enhanced at higher ID, depending on the Rgmod value. For Rgmod < 1, in turn (plot 4), the predominance of the resonant mode at LPS-LD's threshold, and then gradual switching-on of low-order modes with increasing ID is expected. These gain profile variations influence the calculated average gain level when the assumed electronic gain in active stripes is kept constant (e.g. 400 cm-1 in Figure 4).
In the CW analysis, the inclusion of thermal index guiding in the active stripe [38,39] equalizes the calculated lateral mode gains, covering the mode-discriminating mechanism described above (by varying spatial overlap). For WS-LD it is shown in Figure 5-plot 3a for CW operation with an assumed temperature rise of the active layer ΔT = 10 K (then ΔT tends to 0 K at heterostructure surfaces in all modelled cases). This is compared with the gain distribution for short-pulse-operation – plot 3. The calculated equalization means that many lateral modes can be excited simultaneously, with a possibility of unrestricted competition. The lack of control over this effect gives rise to the optical field and emitted beam instabilities. In LPS-LDs, in turn, the mode-gain equalization effect includes lateral modes of the orders 0 < n < N-1, as seen in Figure 5-plots 2a - c, compared to plot 1 for pulse operation (this equalization with a slight gain rise of modes close to the resonance results in a change from Rgmod > 1 to Rgmod < 1). The gains of further modes (n > N-1) are sharply reduced due to the spatial mismatch with LPS. This restricts and stabilizes the emitted beam divergence. The effect depends on the thermal index guiding magnitude, characterized here by the active region temperature rise ΔT (generally attributed to ID variations, irrespective of device construction details). This is shown by plots 2a - c (Figure 5) for ΔT = 5 - 15 K, respectively, with temperature fluctuations between the active (d) and passive stripes (s) of 1 K (in the active layer), in agreement with earlier results [14,37,39]. According to these results, the resonant mode preference, especially with respect to modes n > N-1, is slightly reduced with increasing ΔT, but still the gain difference restricts the emitted beam profile expansion in a wide ID range, which points to the beam divergence stabilization ability of the LPS. At the same time, gain equalization allows for nearly uncontrolled competition of optical field components from the range 0 < n < N-1.
LPS LD structures of the total width N × Λ = 18 × 9 = 162 μm (a fragment shown in Figure 3), wet-etched atop of previously etched mesa stripes of width W = 170 μm were made from the asymmetric 970-nm-emitting InGaAs/AlGaAs/GaAs heterostructure wafer. Etching of trenches (s) through the p+ contact layer leads to local Schottky isolations at the metal-AlGaAs interfaces. The 'reference' He+-implantation-isolated WS structures of W = 190 μm have been manufactured in parallel, from the same heterostructure. The etching depth and the He+-implantation range are similar. Exemplary P-I-V pulsed characteristics of unmounted LDs made from both groups (of common cavity length L = 3 mm and LR/HR facets coatings) are shown in Figure 6. Threshold currents and external efficiencies as well as series resistances are similar; the differences are within the range of technological dispersion over the wafer. This demonstrates that no extra optical loss or electrical hindrances were introduced by inserting the LPS into the heterostructure.
A set of pulsed NF- as well as pulsed and CW FF-characteristics of an exemplary LPS-LD is shown in Figure 7. The relatively shallow intensity modulation depth seen in the NF characteristics (Figure 7a) indicates the dominance of lowest-order modes in this diode over the applied ID range. This corresponds with plots 2 or 3 (Rgmod > 1) in Figure 4. In the pulsed FF characteristics (Figure 7b) this dominance is even more pronounced, but the lateral beam divergence is stabilized by high-order (close to resonant) modes. The share of these modes grows rather slowly with ID increase, which can be an indication of a partial, above-threshold gain saturation effect due to an optical field 'ordering' by the periodicity. Divergence stabilization effected by the LPS makes it independent of L, as illustrated in Figure 8a-b, unlike in conventional gain-guided WS LDs.
Diodes prepared for CW operation were In-soldered on Cu heatsinks and wire-bonded. The representative CW P-I-V characteristics of the LPS-LD are shown in Figure 6 together with the pulse characteristics of unmounted devices. The CW characteristics start from ID = 1.5 A, which is the low current limit of the CW source used (ILX Lightwave model LDX-36085-12).
The CW FF characteristics of the LPS-LD is shown in Figure 7c. The beam divergence stabilization over the applied ID range results from the restricted 0 < n < N-1 range of 'included' modes, as explained in Figure 5 (plots 2a-c). Compared to the pulse characteristics (Figure 7b, the same diode before mounting), the increased share of high-order modes is caused by thermal index guiding and mode-gain equalization (plots 2a-c compared to plot 1 in Figure 5). At the same time, the competition of the included modes is seen as intensity fluctuations of their interference fringes with ID changes in CW FF patterns.
The CW FF characteristics of another LPS-LD and of a 'reference' WS-LD are shown in Figures 9a and 9b, respectively. Even though the lateral beam profiles can differ for individual LPS-LDs (as seen in Figures 7c and 9a) due to heterostructure micro-nonuniformities, the LPS stabilizes the beam divergence (ⅰ) of LDs from the same wafer (determined by W and N) and (ⅱ) as a function of ID. In comparison with the unstable FF patterns of WS-LD (Figure 9b) the progress in the lateral optical field distribution control is clear.
LDs with various LPS modulation depths resulting in different (stabilized) FF characteristics have been investigated as well [33,37,40]. Filamentation reduction has been demonstrated [33,37]. Moreover, such effects as lateral current crowding, carrier accumulation at stripe edges or the resulting thermal FF blooming that are common for CW-operated WS-LDs [7,8,9,10,23,28,41], have not been observed in LPS-LDs.
The lateral periodic structure (LPS) built into wide-stripe-LD design can stabilize its optical field distribution and the emitted beam divergence in the junction plane over a wide drive current range. The stabilization is achieved by restricting the lasing lateral-mode-orders to range 0 < n < N-1 and cutting out higher ones (N is the number of stripes in the LPS). The lateral beam divergence is determined by LD's active stripe width (W) and N. In CW operation, thermal index guiding flattens the gain distribution of lasing modes, resulting in relative enhancement of mode-orders close to N, which is observed as an increase of optical power at the sides of the FF pattern.
Formation and control of a periodic current flow by LPS prevents such effects as lateral current crowding, carrier accumulation at stripe edges and the resulting far-field blooming in LPS-LDs that conventional wide-stripe LDs suffer from. Within the range 0 < n < N-1 lasing modes competition can lead to beam profile fluctuations at CW drive current changes, but the overall beam divergence is stabilized. Such lateral stability of a non-Gaussian laser beam profile can be interesting for numerous applications.
The work supported by the internal ITME project “Stabilization of emitted beam profile in junction plane of high-power laser diodes”.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in this paper.
[1] | Julien CM, Mauger A, Vijh A, et al. (2016) Principles of Intercalation, In: Julien CM, Mauger A, Vijh A, et al., Lithium Batteries: Science and Technology, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 69–91. |
[2] |
Novák P, Panitz JC, Joho F, et al. (2000) Advanced in situ methods for the characterization of practical electrodes in lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 90: 52–58. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(00)00447-X
![]() |
[3] |
Shao M (2014) In situ microscopic studies on the structural and chemical behaviors of lithium-ion battery materials. J Power Sources 270: 475–486. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.07.123
![]() |
[4] |
Harks PPRML, Mulder FM, Notten PHL (2015) In situ methods for Li-ion battery research: A review of recent developments. J Power Sources 288: 92–105. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.084
![]() |
[5] |
Weatherup RS, Bayer BC, Blume R, et al. (2011) In situ characterization of alloy catalysts for low-temperature graphene growth. Nano Lett 11: 4154–4160. doi: 10.1021/nl202036y
![]() |
[6] |
Yang Y, Liu X, Dai Z, et al. (2017) In situ electrochemistry of rechargeable battery materials: Status report and perspectives. Adv Mater 29: 1606922. doi: 10.1002/adma.201606922
![]() |
[7] | Shu J, Ma R, Shao L, et al. (2014) In-situ X-ray diffraction study on the structural evolutions of LiNi0.5Co0.3Mn0.2O2 in different working potential windows. J Power Sources 245: 7–18. |
[8] |
Membreño N, Xiao P, Park KS, et al. (2013) In situ Raman study of phase stability of α-Li3V2(PO4)3 upon thermal and laser heating. J Phys Chem C 117: 11994–12002. doi: 10.1021/jp403282a
![]() |
[9] |
Kong F, Kostecki R, Nadeau G, et al. (2001) In situ studies of SEI formation. J Power Sources 97–98: 58–66. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00588-2
![]() |
[10] |
Mehdi BL, Qian J, Nasybulin E, et al. (2015) Observation and quantification of nanoscale processes in lithium batteries by operando electrochemical (S)TEM. Nano Lett 15: 2168–2173. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00175
![]() |
[11] |
Kerlau M, Marcinek M, Srinivasan V, et al. (2007) Studies of local degradation phenomena in composite cathodes for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 52: 5422–5429. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.02.085
![]() |
[12] |
Hausbrand R, Cherkashinin G, Ehrenberg H, et al. (2015) Fundamental degradation mechanisms of layered oxide Li-ion battery cathode materials: Methodology, insights and novel approaches. Mater Sci Eng B-Adv 192: 3–25. doi: 10.1016/j.mseb.2014.11.014
![]() |
[13] | Julien C (2000) Local environment in 4-volt cathode materials for Li-ion batteries, In: Julien C, Stoynov Z, Materials for Lithium-ion Batteries, NATO Science Series (Series 3. High Technology), Dordrecht: Springer, 309–326. |
[14] |
Itoh T, Sato H, Nishina T, et al. (1997) In situ Raman spectroscopic study of LixCoO2 electrodes in propylene carbonate solvent systems. J Power Sources 68: 333–337. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(97)02539-1
![]() |
[15] |
Song SW, Han KS, Fujita H, et al. (2001) In situ visible Raman spectroscopic study of phase change in LiCoO2 film by laser irradiation. Chem Phys Lett 344: 299–304. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(01)00677-7
![]() |
[16] |
Julien C (2000) Local cationic environment in lithium nickel–cobalt oxides used as cathode materials for lithium batteries. Solid State Ionics 136–137: 887–896. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00503-8
![]() |
[17] |
Julien CM, Gendron F, Amdouni N, et al. (2006) Lattice vibrations of materials for lithium rechargeable batteries. VI: Ordered spinels. Mater Sci Eng B-Adv 130: 41–48. doi: 10.1016/j.mseb.2006.02.003
![]() |
[18] |
Ramana CV, Smith RJ, Hussain OM, et al. (2004) Growth and surface characterization of V2O5 thin films made by pulsed-laser deposition. J Vac Sci Technol A 22: 2453–2458. doi: 10.1116/1.1809123
![]() |
[19] |
Zhang X, Frech R (1998) In situ Raman spectroscopy of LixV2O5 in a lithium rechargeable battery. J Electrochem Soc 145: 847–851. doi: 10.1149/1.1838356
![]() |
[20] |
Inaba M, Iriyama Y, Ogumi Z, et al. (1997) Raman study of layered rock‐salt LiCoO2 and its electrochemical lithium deintercalation. J Raman Spectrosc 28: 613–617. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4555(199708)28:8<613::AID-JRS138>3.0.CO;2-T
![]() |
[21] |
Battisti D, Nazri GA, Klassen B, et al. (1993) Vibrational studies of lithium perchlorate in propylene carbonate solutions. J Phys Chem 97: 5826–5830. doi: 10.1021/j100124a007
![]() |
[22] |
Yamanaka T, Nakagawa H, Tsubouchi S, et al. (2017) In situ Raman spectroscopic studies on concentration of electrolyte salt in lithium-ion batteries by using ultrafine multifiber probes. ChemSusChem 10: 855–861. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201601473
![]() |
[23] |
Yang Y, Liu X, Dai Z, et al. (2017) In situ electrochemistry of rechargeable battery materials: Status report and perspectives. Adv Mater 29: 1606922. doi: 10.1002/adma.201606922
![]() |
[24] | Lei J, McLarnon F, Kostecki R (2005) In situ Raman microscopy of individual LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 particles in a Li-ion battery composite cathode. J Phys Chem B 109: 952–957. |
[25] |
Nakagawa H, Dom Yi, Doi T, et al. (2014) In situ Raman study of graphite negative-electrodes in electrolyte solution containing fluorinated phosphoric esters. J Electrochem Soc 161: A480–A485. doi: 10.1149/2.007404jes
![]() |
[26] |
Zhang X, Cheng F, Zhang K, et al. (2012) Facile polymer-assisted synthesis of LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 with a hierarchical micro–nano structure and high rate capability. RSC Adv 2: 5669–5675. doi: 10.1039/C2RA20669B
![]() |
[27] |
Amaraj SF, Aurbach D (2011) The use of in situ techniques in R&D of Li and Mg rechargeable batteries. J Solid State Electr 15: 877–890. doi: 10.1007/s10008-011-1324-9
![]() |
[28] |
Stancovski V, Badilescu S (2014) In situ Raman spectroscopic–electrochemical studies of lithium-ion battery materials: a historical overview. J Appl Electrochem 44: 23–43. doi: 10.1007/s10800-013-0628-0
![]() |
[29] |
Baddour-Hadjean R, Pereira-Ramos JP (2010) Raman microspectrometry applied to the study of electrode materials for lithium batteries. Chem Rev 110: 1278–1319. doi: 10.1021/cr800344k
![]() |
[30] |
Burba CM, Frech R (2006) Modified coin cells for in situ Raman spectro-electrochemical measurements of LixV2O5 for lithium rechargeable batteries. Appl Spectrosc 60: 490–493. doi: 10.1366/000370206777412167
![]() |
[31] |
Gross T, Giebeler L, Hess C (2013) Novel in situ cell for Raman diagnostics of lithium-ion batteries. Rev Sci Instrum 84: 073109. doi: 10.1063/1.4813263
![]() |
[32] |
Gross T, Hess C (2014) Raman diagnostics of LiCoO2 electrodes for lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 256: 220–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.084
![]() |
[33] |
Sole C, Drewett NE, Hardwick LJ (2014) In situ Raman study of lithium-ion intercalation into microcrystalline graphite. Faraday Discuss 172: 223–237. doi: 10.1039/C4FD00079J
![]() |
[34] |
Novák P, Goers D, Hardwick L, et al. (2005) Advanced in situ characterization methods applied to carbonaceous materials. J Power Sources 146: 15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.129
![]() |
[35] |
Fang S, Yan M, Hamers RJ (2017) Cell design and image analysis for in situ Raman mapping of inhomogeneous state-of-charge profiles in lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 352: 18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.055
![]() |
[36] |
Ghanty C, Markovsky B, Erickson EM, et al. (2015) Li+-ion extraction/insertion of Ni-rich Li1+x(NiyCozMnz)wO2 (0.005 < x < 0.03; y:z = 8:1, w ≈ 1) electrodes: in situ XRD and Raman spectroscopy study. ChemElectroChem 2: 1479–1486. doi: 10.1002/celc.201500160
![]() |
[37] |
Huang JX, Li B, Liu B, et al. (2016) Structural evolution of NM (Ni and Mn) lithium-rich layered material revealed by in-situ electrochemical Raman spectroscopic study. J Power Sources 310: 85–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.01.065
![]() |
[38] |
Dash WC, Newman R (1955) Intrinsic optical absorption in single-crystal germanium and silicon at 77 K and 300 K. Phys Rev 99: 1151–1155. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.99.1151
![]() |
[39] |
Brodsky MH, Title RS, Weiser K, et al. (1970) Structural, optical, and electrical properties of amorphous silicon films. Phys Rev B 1: 2632–2641. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.1.2632
![]() |
[40] |
Pollak E, Salitra G, Baranchugov V, et al. (2007) In situ conductivity, impedance spectroscopy, and ex situ Raman spectra of amorphous silicon during the insertion/extraction of lithium. J Phys Chem C 111: 11437–11444. doi: 10.1021/jp0729563
![]() |
[41] |
Tuinstra F, Koenig JL (1970) Raman spectrum of graphite. J Chem Phys 53: 1126–1130. doi: 10.1063/1.1674108
![]() |
[42] |
Kostecki R, Schnyder B, Alliata D, et al. (2001) Surface studies of carbon films from pyrolyzed photoresist. Thin Solid Films 396: 36–43. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(01)01185-3
![]() |
[43] |
Julien CM, Zaghib K, Mauger A, et al. (2006) Characterization of the carbon coating onto LiFePO4 particles used in lithium batteries. J Appl Phys 100: 063511. doi: 10.1063/1.2337556
![]() |
[44] |
Panitz JC, Joho F, Novák P (1999) In situ characterization of a graphite electrode in a secondary lithium-ion battery using Raman microscopy. Appl Spectrosc 53: 1188–1199. doi: 10.1366/0003702991945650
![]() |
[45] |
Panitz JC, Novák P, Haas O (2001) Raman microscopy applied to rechargeable lithium-ion cells -Steps towards in situ Raman imaging with increased optical efficiency. Appl Spectrosc 55: 1131–1137. doi: 10.1366/0003702011953379
![]() |
[46] |
Panitz JC, Novák P (2001) Raman spectroscopy as a quality control tool for electrodes of lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 97–98: 174–180. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00679-6
![]() |
[47] |
Kostecki R, Lei J, McLarnon F, et al. (2006) Diagnostic evaluation of detrimental phenomena in high-power lithium-ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc 153: A669–A672. doi: 10.1149/1.2170551
![]() |
[48] |
Forster JD, Harris SJ, Urban JJ (2014) Mapping Li+ concentration and transport via in situ confocal Raman microscopy. J Phys Chem Lett 5: 2007–2011. doi: 10.1021/jz500608e
![]() |
[49] |
Nishi T, Nakai H, Kita A (2013) Visualization of the state-of-charge distribution in a LiCoO2 cathode by in situ Raman imaging. J Electrochem Soc 160: A1785–A1788. doi: 10.1149/2.061310jes
![]() |
[50] |
Nanda J, Remillard J, O'Neill A, et al. (2011) Local state-of-charge mapping of lithium-ion battery electrodes. Adv Funct Mater 21: 3282–3290. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201100157
![]() |
[51] |
Slautin B, Alikin D, Rosato D, et al. (2018) Local study of lithiation and degradation paths in LiMn2O4 battery cathodes: confocal Raman microscopy approach. Batteries 4: 21. doi: 10.3390/batteries4020021
![]() |
[52] |
Li J, Shunmugasundaram R, Doig R, et al. (2016) In situ X-ray diffraction study of layered Li–Ni–Mn–Co oxides: Effect of particle size and structural stability of core–shell materials. Chem Mater 28: 162–171. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03500
![]() |
[53] | Graetz J, Gabrisch H, Julien CM, et al. (2003) Raman evidence of spinel formation in delithiated cobalt oxide. Electrochemical society Proceedings Volume 2003-28; Proceedings-electrochemical Society PV, Symposium, Lithium and lithium-ion battery, 28: 95–100. |
[54] |
Yu L, Liu H, Wang Y, et al. (2013) Preferential adsorption of solvents on the cathode surface of lithium ion batteries. Angew Chem Int Edit 52: 5753–5756. doi: 10.1002/anie.201209976
![]() |
[55] | Kuwata N, Ise K, Matsuda Y, et al. (2012) Detection of degradation in LiCoO2 thin films by in situ micro Raman spectroscopy, In: Chowdari BVR, Kawamura J, Mizusaki J, et al. (Eds.), Solid State Ionics: Ionics for Sustainable World, Proceedings of the 13th Asian Conference, Singapore: World Scientific, 138–143. |
[56] |
Gross T, Hess C (2014) Spatially-resolved in situ Raman analysis of LiCoO2 electrodes. ECS Trans 61: 1–9. doi: 10.1149/06112.0001ecst
![]() |
[57] |
Fukumitsu H, Omori M, Terada K, et al. (2015) Development of in situ cross-sectional Raman imaging of LiCoO2 cathode for Li-ion battery. Electrochemistry 83: 993–996. doi: 10.5796/electrochemistry.83.993
![]() |
[58] |
Heber M, Schilling C, Gross T, et al. (2015) In situ Raman and UV-Vis spectroscopic analysis of lithium-ion batteries. MRS Proceedings 1773: 33–40. doi: 10.1557/opl.2015.634
![]() |
[59] |
Otoyama M, Ito Y, Hayashi A, et al. (2016) Raman imaging for LiCoO2 composite positive electrodes in all-solid-state lithium batteries using Li2S–P2S5 solid electrolytes. J Power Sources 302: 419–425. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.10.040
![]() |
[60] |
Porthault H, Baddour-Hadjean R, Le Cras F, et al. (2012) Raman study of the spinel-to-layered phase transformation in sol–gel LiCoO2 cathode powders as a function of the post-annealing temperature. Vib Spectrosc 62: 152–158. doi: 10.1016/j.vibspec.2012.05.004
![]() |
[61] |
Park Y, Kim NH, Kim JY, et al. (2010) Surface characterization of the high voltage LiCoO2/Li cell by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and 2D correlation analysis. Vib Spectrosc 53: 60–63. doi: 10.1016/j.vibspec.2010.01.004
![]() |
[62] |
Zhang X, Mauger A, Lu Q, et al. (2010) Synthesis and characterization of LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 by wet-chemical method. Electrochim Acta 55: 6440–6449. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.06.040
![]() |
[63] |
Ben-Kamel K, Amdouni N, Mauger A, et al. (2012) Study of the local structure of LiNi0.33+dMn0.33+dCo0.33−2dO2 (0.025 ≤ d ≤ 0.075) oxides. J Alloy Compd 528: 91–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.03.018
![]() |
[64] | Hayden C, Talin AA (2014) Raman spectroscopic analysis of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 cathodes stressed to high voltage. |
[65] |
Otoyama M, Ito Y, Hayashi A, et al. (2016) Raman spectroscopy for LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 composite positive electrodes in all-solid-state lithium batteries. Electrochemistry 84: 812–816. doi: 10.5796/electrochemistry.84.812
![]() |
[66] |
Lanz P, Villevieille C, Novák P (2014) Ex situ and in situ Raman microscopic investigation of the differences between stoichiometric LiMO2 and high-energy xLi2MnO3·(1 − x)LiMO2 (M = Ni, Co, Mn)· Electrochim Acta 130: 206–212. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.03.004
![]() |
[67] |
Koga H, Croguennec L, Mannessiez P, et al. (2012) Li1.20Mn0.54Co0.13Ni0.13O2 with different particle sizes as attractive positive electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries: Insights into their structure. J Phys Chem C 116: 13497–13506. doi: 10.1021/jp301879x
![]() |
[68] |
Julien CM, Massot M (2003) Lattice vibrations of materials for lithium rechargeable batteries III. Lithium manganese oxides. Mater Sci Eng B-Adv 100: 69–78. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5107(03)00077-1
![]() |
[69] |
Singh G, West WC, Soler J, et al. (2012) In situ Raman spectroscopy of layered solid solution Li2MnO3–LiMO2 (M = Ni, Mn, Co). J Power Sources 218: 34–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.06.083
![]() |
[70] |
Lanz P, Villevieille C, Novák P (2013) Electrochemical activation of Li2MnO3 at elevated temperature investigated by in situ Raman microscopy. Electrochim Acta 109: 426–432. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.07.130
![]() |
[71] |
Rao CV, Soler J, Katiyar R, et al. (2014) Investigations on electrochemical behavior and structural stability of Li1.2Mn0.54Ni0.13Co0.13O2 lithium-ion cathodes via in-situ and ex-situ Raman spectroscopy. J Phys Chem C 118: 14133–14141. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.032
![]() |
[72] |
Hy S, Felix F, Rick J, et al. (2014) Direct in situ observation of Li2O evolution on Li-rich high-capacity cathode material, Li[NixLi(1−2x)/3Mn(2−x)/3]O2 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.5). J Am Chem Soc 136: 999–1007. doi: 10.1021/ja410137s
![]() |
[73] |
Shojan J, Rao-Chitturi V, Soler J, et al. (2015) High energy xLi2MnO3·(1 − x)LiNi2/3Co1/6Mn1/6O2 composite cathode for advanced Li-ion batteries.J Power Sources 274: 440–450. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.032
![]() |
[74] |
Grey CP, Yoon W, Reed J, et al. (2004) Electrochemical activity of Li in the transition-metal sites of O3 Li[Li (1−2x)/3Mn(2−x)/3Nix]O2. Electrochem Solid St 7: A290–A 293. doi: 10.1149/1.1783113
![]() |
[75] | Amalraj F, Talianker M, Markovsky B, et al. (2013) Study of the lithium-rich integrated compound xLi2MnO3·(1 − x)LiMO2 (x around 0.5; M = Mn, Ni, Co; 2:2:1) and its electrochemical activity as positive electrode in lithium cells. J Electrochem Soc 160: A324–A337. |
[76] |
Kumar-Nayak P, Grinblat J, Levi M, et al. (2014) Electrochemical and structural characterization of carbon coated Li1.2Mn0.56Ni0.16Co0.08O2 and Li1.2Mn0.6Ni0.2O2 as cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 137: 546–556. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.06.055
![]() |
[77] |
Wu Q, Maroni VA, Gosztola DJ, et al. (2015) A Raman-based investigation of the fate of Li2MnO3 in lithium- and manganese-rich cathode materials for lithium ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc 162: A1255–A1264. doi: 10.1149/2.0631507jes
![]() |
[78] |
Bak SM, Nam KW, Chang W, et al. (2013) Correlating structure changes and gas evolution during the thermal decomposition of charged LixNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 cathode material. Chem Mater 25: 337–351. doi: 10.1021/cm303096e
![]() |
[79] |
Julien C, Camacho-Lopez MA, Lemal M, et al. (2002) LiCo1−yMyO2 positive electrodes for rechargeable lithium batteries. I. Aluminum doped materials. Mater Sci Eng B-Adv 95: 6–13. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5107(01)01010-8
![]() |
[80] | Julien CM, Mauger A, Vijh A, et al. (2016) Cathode Materials with Monoatomic Ions in a Three-Dimensional Framework, In: Julien CM, Mauger A, Vijh A, et al., Lithium Batteries: Science and Technology, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 163–199. |
[81] | Ohzuku T, Kitagawa M, Hirai T (1990) Electrochemistry of manganese dioxide in lithium nonaqueous cell. III. X-ray diffractional study on the reduction of spinel-related manganese dioxide. J Electrochem Soc 137: 769–775. |
[82] |
Liu W, Kowal K, Farrington GC (1998) Mechanism of the electrochemical insertion of lithium into LiMn2O4 spinels. J Electrochem Soc 145: 459–465. doi: 10.1149/1.1838285
![]() |
[83] |
Xia Y, Yoshio M (1996) An investigation of lithium ion insertion into spinel structure Li–Mn–O compounds. J Electrochem Soc 143: 825–833. doi: 10.1149/1.1836544
![]() |
[84] |
Richard MN, Keotschau I, Dahn JR (1997) A cell for in situ x‐ray diffraction based on coin cell hardware and Bellcore plastic electrode technology. J Electrochem Soc 144: 554–557. doi: 10.1149/1.1837447
![]() |
[85] | Yang XQ, Sun X, Lee SJ, et al. (1999) In situ synchrotron X‐ray diffraction studies of the phase transitions in LixMn2O4 cathode Materials. Electrochem Solid St 2: 157–160. |
[86] |
Kanamura K, Naito H, Yao T, et al. (1996) Structural change of the LiMn2O4 spinel structure induced by extraction of lithium. J Mater Chem 6: 33–36. doi: 10.1039/jm9960600033
![]() |
[87] |
White WB, DeAngelis A (1967) Interpretation of the vibrational spectra of spinels. Spectrochim Acta A 23: 985–995. doi: 10.1016/0584-8539(67)80023-0
![]() |
[88] |
Ammundsen B, Burns GR, Islam MS, et al. (1999) Lattice dynamics and vibrational spectra of lithium manganese oxides: A computer simulation and spectroscopic study. J Phys Chem B 103: 5175–5180. doi: 10.1021/jp984398l
![]() |
[89] | Kanoh H, Tang W, Ooi K (1998) In situ Raman spectroscopic study on electroinsertion of Li+ into a Pt/l-MnO2 electrode in aqueous solution. Electrochem Solid St 1: 17–19. |
[90] |
Huang W, Frech R (1999) In situ Raman spectroscopic studies of electrochemical intercalation in LixMn2O4-based cathodes. J Power Sources 81–82: 616–620. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00231-1
![]() |
[91] |
Julien C, Massot M (2003) Lattice vibrations of materials for lithium rechargeable batteries I. Lithium manganese oxide spinel. Mater Sci Eng B-Adv 97: 217–230. doi: 10.1016/j.mseb.2003.09.028
![]() |
[92] |
Dokko K, Shi Q, Stefan IC, et al. (2003) In situ Raman spectroscopy of single microparticle Li+-intercalation electrodes. J Phys Chem B 107: 12549–12554. doi: 10.1021/jp034977c
![]() |
[93] |
Anzue N, Itoh T, Mohamedi M, et al. (2003) In situ Raman spectroscopic study of thin-film Li1−xMn2O4 electrodes. Solid State Ionics 156: 301–307. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00693-8
![]() |
[94] |
Shi Q, Takahashi Y, Akimoto J, et al. (2005) In situ Raman scattering measurements of a LiMn2O4 single crystal microelectrode. Electrochem Solid St 8: A521–A524. doi: 10.1149/1.2030507
![]() |
[95] | Sun X, Yang XQ, Balasubramanian M, et al. (2002) In situ investigation of phase transitions of Li1+yMn2O4 spinel during Li-ion extraction and insertion. J Electrochem Soc 149: A842–A848. |
[96] |
Michalska M, Ziołkowska DA, Jasinski JB, et al. (2018) Improved electrochemical performance of LiMn2O4 cathode material by Ce doping. Electrochim Acta 276: 37–46. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.165
![]() |
[97] | Liu J, Manthiram A (2009) Understanding the improved electrochemical performances of Fe-substituted 5 V spinel cathode LiMn1.5Ni0.5O4. J Phys Chem C 113: 15073–15079. |
[98] |
Alcantara R, Jaraba M, Lavela P, et al. (2003) Structural and electrochemical study of new LiNi0.5TixMn1.5−xO4 spinel oxides for 5-V cathode materials. Chem Mater 15: 2376–2382. doi: 10.1021/cm034080s
![]() |
[99] | Zhong GB, Wang YY, Yu YQ, et al. (2012) Electrochemical investigations of the LiNi0.45M0.10Mn1.45O4 (M = Fe, Co, Cr) 5 V cathode materials for lithium ion batteries. J Power Sources 205: 385–393. |
[100] |
Liu D, Hamel-Paquet J, Trottier J, et al. (2012) Synthesis of pure phase disordered LiMn1.45Cr0.1Ni0.45O4 by a post-annealing method. J Power Sources 217: 400–406. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.06.063
![]() |
[101] |
Zhu W, Liu D, Trottier J, et al. (2014) Comparative studies of the phase evolution in M-doped LixMn1.5Ni0.5O4 (M = Co, Al, Cu and Mg) by in-situ X-ray diffraction. J Power Sources 264: 290–298. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.122
![]() |
[102] |
Dokko K, Mohamedi M, Anzue N, et al. (2002) In situ Raman spectroscopic studies of LiNixMn2−xO4 thin film cathode materials for lithium ion secondary batteries. J Mater Chem 12: 3688–3693. doi: 10.1039/B206764A
![]() |
[103] | Zhu W, Liu D, Trottier J, et al. (2014) In situ Raman spectroscopic investigation of LiMn1.45Ni0.45M0.1O4 (M = Cr, Co) 5 V cathode materials. J Power Sources 298: 341–348. |
[104] |
Cocciantelli JM, Doumerc JP, Pouchard M, et al. (1991) Crystal chemistry of electrochemically inserted LixV2O5. J Power Sources 34: 103–111. doi: 10.1016/0378-7753(91)85029-V
![]() |
[105] | Zhang X, Frech R (1996) In situ Raman spectroscopy of LixV2O5 in a lithium rechargeable battery. ECS Proceedings 17: 198–203. |
[106] |
Baddour-Hadjean R, Navone C, Pereira-Ramos JP (2009) In situ Raman microspectrometry investigation of electrochemical lithium intercalation into sputtered crystalline V2O5 thin films. Electrochim Acta 54: 6674–6679. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.06.052
![]() |
[107] |
Jung H, Gerasopoulos K, Talin AA, et al. (2017) In situ characterization of charge rate dependent stress and structure changes in V2O5 cathode prepared by atomic layer deposition. J Power Sources 340: 89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.035
![]() |
[108] |
Jung H, Gerasopoulos K, Talin AA, et al. (2017) A platform for in situ Raman and stress characterizations of V2O5 cathode using MEMS device. Electrochim Acta 242: 227–239. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.04.160
![]() |
[109] |
Julien C, Ivanov I, Gorenstein A (1995) Vibrational modifications on lithium intercalation in V2O5 films. Mater Sci Eng B-Adv 33: 168–172. doi: 10.1016/0921-5107(95)80032-8
![]() |
[110] |
Baddour-Hadjean R, Pereira-Ramos JP, Navone C, et al. (2008) Raman microspectrometry study of electrochemical lithium intercalation into sputtered crystalline V2O5 thin films. Chem Mater 20: 1916–1923. doi: 10.1021/cm702979k
![]() |
[111] |
Baddour-Hadjean R, Raekelboom E, Pereira-Ramos JP (2006) New structural characterization of the LixV2O5 system provided by Raman spectroscopy. Chem Mater 18: 3548–3556. doi: 10.1021/cm060540g
![]() |
[112] |
Baddour-Hadjean R, Marzouk A, Pereira-Ramos JP (2012) Structural modifications of LixV2O5 in a composite cathode (0 < x < 2) investigated by Raman microspectrometry. J Raman Spectrosc 43: 153–160. doi: 10.1002/jrs.2984
![]() |
[113] |
Baddour-Hadjean R, Pereira-Ramos JP (2007) New structural approach of lithium intercalation using Raman spectroscopy. J Power Sources 174: 1188–1192. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.177
![]() |
[114] |
Julien C, Massot M (2002) Spectroscopic studies of the local structure in positive electrodes for lithium batteries. Phys Chem Chem Phys 4: 4226–4235. doi: 10.1039/b203361e
![]() |
[115] |
Chen D, Ding D, Li X, et al. (2015) Probing the charge storage mechanism of a pseudocapacitive MnO2 electrode using in operando Raman spectroscopy. Chem Mater 27: 6608–6619. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03118
![]() |
[116] |
Julien CM, Massot M, Poinsignon C (2004) Lattice vibrations of manganese oxides: Part I. Periodic structures. Spectrochim Acta A 60: 689–700. doi: 10.1016/S1386-1425(03)00279-8
![]() |
[117] |
Hashem AM, Abuzeid H, Kaus M, et al. (2018) Green synthesis of nanosized manganese dioxide as positive electrode for lithium-ion batteries using lemon juice and citrus peel. Electrochim Acta 262: 74–81. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.01.024
![]() |
[118] |
Julien C, Massot M, Baddour-Hadjean R, et al. (2003) Raman spectra of birnessite manganese dioxides. Solid State Ionics 159: 345–356. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(03)00035-3
![]() |
[119] |
Hwang SJ, Park HS, Choy JH, et al. (2001) Micro-Raman spectroscopic study on layered lithium manganese oxide and its delithiated/relithiated derivatives. Electrochem Solid St 4: A213–A216. doi: 10.1149/1.1413704
![]() |
[120] |
Chen D, Ding D, Li X, et al. (2015) Probing the charge storage mechanism of a pseudocapacitive MnO2 electrode using in operando Raman spectroscopy. Chem Mater 27: 6608–6619. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03118
![]() |
[121] |
Yang L, Cheng S, Wang J, et al. (2016) Investigation into the origin of high stability of δ-MnO2 pseudo-capacitive electrode using operando Raman spectroscopy. Nano Energy 30: 293–302. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.10.018
![]() |
[122] |
Zaghib K, Dontigny M, Perret P, et al. (2014) Electrochemical and thermal characterization of lithium titanate spinel anode in C-LiFePO4//C-Li4Ti5O12 cells at sub-zero temperatures. J Power Sources 248: 1050–1057. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.083
![]() |
[123] | Paques-Ledent MT, Tarte P (1974) Vibrational studies of olivine-type compounds 2. Orthophosphates, orthoarsenates and orthovanadates AIBIIXVO4. Spectrochim Acta A 30: 673–689. |
[124] | Wu J, Dathar GK, Sun C, et al. (2013) In situ Raman spectroscopy of LiFePO4: size and morphology dependence during charge and self-discharge. Nanotechnology 24: 424009. |
[125] |
Ramana CV, Mauger A, Gendron F, et al. (2009) Study of the Li-insertion/extraction process in LiFePO4/FePO4. J Power Sources 187: 555–564. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.11.042
![]() |
[126] |
Siddique NA, Salehi A, Wei Z, et al. (2015) Length‐scale‐dependent phase transformation of LiFePO4: An in situ and operando study using micro‐Raman spectroscopy and XRD. ChemPhysChem 16: 2383–2388. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201500299
![]() |
[127] |
Burba CM, Frech R (2004) Raman and FTIR spectroscopic study of LixFePO4 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1). J Electrochem Soc 151: A1032–A1038. doi: 10.1149/1.1756885
![]() |
[128] |
Morita M, Asai Y, Yoshimoto N, et al. (1998) A Raman spectroscopic study of organic electrolyte solutions based on binary solvent systems of ethylene carbonate with low viscosity solvents which dissolve different lithium salts. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 94: 3451–3456. doi: 10.1039/a806278a
![]() |
[129] |
Burba CM, Frech R (2007) Vibrational spectroscopic studies of monoclinic and rhombohedral Li3V2(PO4)3. Solid State Ionics 177: 3445–3454. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2006.09.017
![]() |
[130] |
Yin SC, Grondey H, Strobel P, et al. (2003) Electrochemical property: Structure relationships in monoclinic Li3V2(PO4)3. J Am Chem Soc 125: 10402–10411. doi: 10.1021/ja034565h
![]() |
[131] | Takeuchi KJ, Marschilok AC, Davis SM, et al. (2001) Silver vanadium oxide and related battery applications. Coordin Chem Rev 219–221: 283–310. |
[132] |
Bao Q, Bao S, Li CM, et al. (2007) Lithium insertion in channel-structured b-AgVO3: in situ Raman study and computer simulation. Chem Mater 19: 5965–5972. doi: 10.1021/cm071728i
![]() |
[133] |
Tuinstra F, Koenig JL (1970) Raman spectrum of graphite. J Chem Phys 53: 1126–1130. doi: 10.1063/1.1674108
![]() |
[134] |
Reich S, Thomsen C (2004) Raman spectroscopy of graphite. Philos T R Soc A 362: 2271–2288. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2004.1454
![]() |
[135] |
Inaba M, Yoshida H, Yida H, et al. (1995) In situ Raman study on electrochemical Li intercalation into graphite. J Electrochem Soc 142: 20–26. doi: 10.1149/1.2043869
![]() |
[136] | Huang W, Frech R (1998) In situ Raman studies of graphite surface structures during lithium electrochemical intercalation. J Electrochem Soc 145: 765–770. |
[137] | Novák P, Joho F, Imhof R, et al. (1999) In situ investigation of the interaction between graphite and electrolyte solutions. J Power Sources 81–82: 212–216. |
[138] |
Luo Y, Cai WB, Scherson DA (2002) In situ, real-time Raman microscopy of embedded single particle graphite electrodes. J Electrochem Soc 149: A1100–A1105. doi: 10.1149/1.1492286
![]() |
[139] | Kostecki R, McLarnon F (2003) Microprobe study of the effect of Li intercalation on the structure of graphite. J Power Sources 119–121: 550–554. |
[140] |
Luo Y, Cai WB, Xing XK, et al. (2004) In situ, time-resolved Raman spectromicrotopography of an operating lithium-ion battery. Electrochem Solid St 7: E1–E5. doi: 10.1149/1.1627972
![]() |
[141] | Shi Q, Dokko K, Scherson DA (2004) In situ Raman microscopy of a single graphite microflake electrode in a Li+-containing electrolyte. J Phys Chem B 108: 4798–4793. |
[142] |
Migge S, Sandmann G, Rahner D, et al. (2005) Studying lithium intercalation into graphite particles via in situ Raman spectroscopy and confocal microscopy. J Solid State Electr 9: 132–137. doi: 10.1007/s10008-004-0563-4
![]() |
[143] |
Hardwick LJ, Hahn M, Ruch P, et al. (2006) Graphite surface disorder detection using in situ Raman microscopy. Solid State Ionics 177: 2801–2806. doi: 10.1016/j.ssi.2006.03.032
![]() |
[144] |
Hardwick LJ, Buqa H, Holzapfel M, et al. (2007) Behaviour of highly crystalline graphitic materials in lithium-ion cells with propylene carbonate containing electrolytes: An in situ Raman and SEM study. Electrochim Acta 52: 4884–4891. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.12.081
![]() |
[145] | Hardwick LJ, Marcinek M, Beer L, et al. (2008) An investigation of the effect of graphite degradation on irreversible capacity in lithium-ion cells. J Electrochem Soc 155: A442–A447. |
[146] |
Hardwick LJ, Ruch PW, Hahn M, et al. (2008) In situ Raman spectroscopy of insertion electrodes for lithium-ion batteries and supercapacitors: First cycle effects. J Phys Chem Solids 69: 1232–1237. doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2007.10.017
![]() |
[147] |
Nakagawa H, Ochida M, Domi Y, et al. (2012) Electrochemical Raman study of edge plane graphite negative-electrodes in electrolytes containing trialkyl phosphoric ester. J Power Sources 212: 148–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.04.013
![]() |
[148] | Underhill C, Leung SY, Dresselhaus G, et al. (1979) Infrared and Raman spectroscopy of graphite-ferric chloride. Solid State Commun 29: 769–774. |
[149] |
Hardwick LJ, Hahn M, Ruch P, et al. (2006) An in situ Raman study of the intercalation of supercapacitor-type electrolyte into microcrystalline graphite. Electrochim Acta 52: 675–680. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.05.053
![]() |
[150] | Solin SA (1990) Graphite Intercalation Compounds, Berlin: Springer-Verlag. |
[151] |
Brancolini G, Negri F (2004) Quantum chemical modeling of infrared and Raman activities in lithium-doped amorphous carbon nanostructures: hexa-peri-hexabenzocoronene as a model for hydrogen-rich carbon materials. Carbon 42: 1001–1005. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2003.12.016
![]() |
[152] |
Nakagawa H, Domi Y, Doi T, et al. (2012) In situ Raman study on degradation of edge plane graphite negative-electrodes and effects of film-forming additives. J Power Sources 206: 320–324. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.141
![]() |
[153] |
Perez-Villar S, Lanz P, Schneider H, et al. (2013) Characterization of a model solid electrolyte interphase/carbon interface by combined in situ Raman/Fourier transform infrared microscopy. Electrochim Acta 106: 506–515. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.05.124
![]() |
[154] |
Nakagawa H, Domi Y, Doi T, et al. (2013) In situ Raman study on the structural degradation of a graphite composite negative-electrode and the influence of the salt in the electrolyte solution. J Power Sources 236: 138–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.02.060
![]() |
[155] |
Lanz P, Novák P (2014) Combined in situ Raman and IR microscopy at the interface of a single graphite particle with ethylene carbonate/dimethyl carbonate. J Electrochem Soc 161: A1555–A1563. doi: 10.1149/2.0021410jes
![]() |
[156] |
Domi Y, Doi T, Nakagawa H, et al. (2016) In situ Raman study on reversible structural changes of graphite negative-electrodes at high potentials in LiPF6-Based electrolyte solution. J Electrochem Soc 163: A2435–A2440. doi: 10.1149/2.1301610jes
![]() |
[157] |
Yamanaka T, Nakagawa H, Tsubouchi S, et al. (2017) Correlations of concentration changes of electrolyte salt with resistance and capacitance at the surface of a graphite electrode in a lithium ion battery studied by in situ microprobe Raman spectroscopy. Electrochim Acta 251: 301–306. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.119
![]() |
[158] | Bhattacharya S, Alpas AT (2018) A novel elevated temperature pre-treatment for electrochemical capacity enhancement of graphene nanoflake-based anodes. Mater Renew Sustain Energy 7: 3. |
[159] |
Inaba M, Yoshida H, Ogumi Z (1996) In situ Raman study of electrochemical lithium insertion into mesocarbon microbeads heat‐treated at various temperatures. J Electrochem Soc 143: 2572–2578. doi: 10.1149/1.1837049
![]() |
[160] | Totir DA, Scherson DA (2000) Electrochemical and in situ Raman studies of embedded carbon particle electrodes in nonaqueous liquid electrolytes. Electrochem Solid St 3: 263–265. |
[161] |
Ramesha GK, Sampath S (2009) Electrochemical reduction of oriented graphene oxide films: an in situ Raman spectroelectrochemical study. J Phys Chem C 113: 7985–7989. doi: 10.1021/jp811377n
![]() |
[162] |
Tang W, Goh BM, Hu MY, et al. (2016) In situ Raman and nuclear magnetic resonance study of trapped lithium in the solid electrolyte interface of reduced graphene oxide. J Phys Chem C 120: 2600–2608. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b12551
![]() |
[163] | Julien CM, Massot M, Zaghib K (2007) Structural studies of Li4/3Me5/3O4 (Me = Ti, Mn) electrode materials: local structure and electrochemical aspects. J Power Sources 136: 72–79. |
[164] |
Mukai K, Kato Y, Nakano H (2014) Understanding the zero-strain lithium insertion scheme of Li[Li1/3Ti5/3]O4: structural changes at atomic scale clarified by Raman spectroscopy. J Phys Chem C 118: 2992–2999. doi: 10.1021/jp412196v
![]() |
[165] |
Shu J, Shui M, Xu D, et al. (2011) Design and comparison of ex situ and in situ devices for Raman characterization of lithium titanate anode material. Ionics 17: 503–509. doi: 10.1007/s11581-011-0544-4
![]() |
[166] | Julien CM, Mauger A, Vijh A, et al. (2016) Anodes for Li-Ion Batteries, In: Julien CM, Mauger A, Vijh A, et al., Lithium Batteries: Science and Technology, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 323–429. |
[167] |
Ohzuku T, Takehara Z, Yoshizawa S (1979) Non-aqueous lithium/titanium dioxide cell. Electrochim Acta 24: 219–222. doi: 10.1016/0013-4686(79)80028-6
![]() |
[168] | Wagemaker M, Borghols WJH, Mulder FM (2007) Large impact of particle size on insertion reactions. A case for anatase LixTiO2. J Am Chem Soc 129: 4323–4327. |
[169] |
Mukai K, Kato Y, Nakano H (2014) Understanding the zero-strain lithium insertion scheme of Li[Li1/3Ti5/3]O4: structural changes at atomic scale clarified by Raman spectroscopy. J Phys Chem C 118: 2992–2999. doi: 10.1021/jp412196v
![]() |
[170] |
Dinh NN, Oanh NTT, Long PD, et al. (2003) Electrochromic properties of TiO2 anatase thin films prepared by a dipping sol–gel method. Thin Solid Films 423: 70–76. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(02)00948-3
![]() |
[171] |
Smirnov M, Baddour-Hadjean R (2004) Li intercalation in TiO2 anatase: Raman spectroscopy and lattice dynamic studies. J Chem Phys 121: 2348–2355. doi: 10.1063/1.1767993
![]() |
[172] |
Baddour-Hadjean R, Bach S, Smirnov M, et al. (2004) Raman investigation of the structural changes in anatase LixTiO2 upon electrochemical lithium insertion. J Raman Spectrosc 35: 577–585. doi: 10.1002/jrs.1200
![]() |
[173] |
Hardwick LJ, Holzapfel M, Novák P, et al. (2007) Electrochemical lithium insertion into anatase-type TiO2: An in situ Raman microscopy investigation. Electrochim Acta 52: 5357–5367. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.02.050
![]() |
[174] |
Ren Y, Hardwick LJ, Bruce PG (2010) Lithium intercalation into mesoporous anatase with an ordered 3D pore structure. Angew Chem Int Edit 49: 2570–2574. doi: 10.1002/anie.200907099
![]() |
[175] |
Gentili V, Brutti S, Hardwick LJ, et al. (2012) Lithium insertion into anatase nanotubes. Chem Mater 24: 4468–4476. doi: 10.1021/cm302912f
![]() |
[176] |
Laskova BP, Frank O, Zukalova M, et al. (2013) Lithium insertion into titanium dioxide (anatase): A Raman study with 16/18O and 6/7Li isotope labeling. Chem Mater 25: 3710–3717. doi: 10.1021/cm402056j
![]() |
[177] |
Laskova BP, Kavan L, Zukalova M, et al. (2016) In situ Raman spectroelectrochemistry as a useful tool for detection of TiO2(anatase) impurities in TiO2(B) and TiO2(rutile). Monatsh Chem 147: 951–959. doi: 10.1007/s00706-016-1678-x
![]() |
[178] |
Mauger A, Xie H, Julien CM, (2016) Composite anodes for lithium-ion batteries, status and trends. AIMS Mater Sci 3: 1054–1106. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.3.1054
![]() |
[179] |
Li H, Huang X, Chen L, et al. (2000) The crystal structural evolution of nano-Si anode caused by lithium insertion and extraction at room temperature. Solid State Ionics 135: 181–191. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00362-3
![]() |
[180] |
Nanda J, Datta MK, Remillard JT, et al. (2009) In situ Raman microscopy during discharge of a high capacity silicon–carbon composite Li-ion battery negative electrode. Electrochem Commun 11: 235–237. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2008.11.006
![]() |
[181] | Zeng Z, Liu N, Zeng Q, et al. (2016) In situ measurement of lithiation-induced stress in silicon nanoparticles using micro-Raman spectroscopy. Nano Energy 22: 105–110. |
[182] |
Tardif S, Pavlenko E, Quazuguel L, et al. (2017) Operando Raman spectroscopy and synchrotron X-ray diffraction of lithiation/delithiation in silicon nanoparticle anodes. ACS Nano 11: 11306–11316. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b05796
![]() |
[183] |
Miroshnikov Y, Zitoun D (2017) Operando plasmon-enhanced Raman spectroscopy in silicon anodes for Li-ion battery. J Nanopart Res 19: 372. doi: 10.1007/s11051-017-4063-8
![]() |
[184] |
Holzapfel M, Buqa H, Hardwick LJ, et al. (2006) Nano silicon for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 52: 973–978. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.06.034
![]() |
[185] |
Long BR, Chan MKY, Greeley JP, et al. (2011) Dopant modulated Li insertion in Si for battery anodes: theory and experiment. J Phys Chem C 115: 18916–18921. doi: 10.1021/jp2060602
![]() |
[186] |
Miroshnikov Y, Yang J, Shokhen V, et al. (2018) Operando micro-Raman study revealing enhanced connectivity of plasmonic metals decorated silicon anodes for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl Energy Mater 1: 1096–1105. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.7b00220
![]() |
[187] | Zeng Z, Liu N, Zeng Q, et al. (2016) In situ measurement of lithiation-induced stress in silicon nanoparticles using micro-Raman spectroscopy. Nano Energy 22: 105–110. |
[188] |
Yang J, Kraytsberg A, Ein-Eli Y (2015) In situ Raman spectroscopy mapping of Si based anode material lithiation. J Power Sources 282: 294–298. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.044
![]() |
[189] |
Shimizu M, Usui H, Suzumura T, et al. (2015) Analysis of the deterioration mechanism of Si electrode as a Li-ion battery anode using Raman microspectroscopy. J Phys Chem C 119: 2975–2982. doi: 10.1021/jp5121965
![]() |
[190] |
Domi Y, Usui H, Shimizu M, et al. (2016) Effect of phosphorus-doping on electrochemical performance of silicon negative electrodes in lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Inter 8: 7125–7132. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b00386
![]() |
[191] |
Yamaguchi K, Domi Y, Usui H, et al. (2017) Elucidation of the reaction behavior of silicon negative electrodes in a bis(fluorosulfonyl)amide based ionic liquid electrolyte. ChemElectroChem 4: 3257–3263. doi: 10.1002/celc.201700724
![]() |
[192] |
Zhang WJ (2011) A review of the electrochemical performance of alloy anodes for lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 196: 13–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.07.020
![]() |
[193] |
Weppner W, Huggins RA (1977) Determination of the kinetic parameters of mixed-conducting electrodes and application to the system Li3Sb. J Electrochem Soc 124: 1569–1578. doi: 10.1149/1.2133112
![]() |
[194] |
Drewett NE, Aldous AL, Zou J, et al. (2017) In situ Raman spectroscopic analysis of the lithiation and sodiation of antimony microparticles. Electrochim Acta 247: 296–305. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.030
![]() |
[195] |
Zhong X, Wang X, Wang H, et al. (2018) Ultrahigh-performance mesoporous ZnMn2O4 microspheres as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries and their in situ Raman investigation. Nano Res 11: 3814. doi: 10.1007/s12274-017-1955-y
![]() |
[196] |
Cabo-Fernandez L, Mueller F, Passerini S, et al. (2016) In situ Raman spectroscopy of carbon-coated ZnFe2O4 anode material in Li-ion batteries-Investigation of SEI growth. Chem Commun 52: 3970–3973. doi: 10.1039/C5CC09350C
![]() |
[197] |
Schmitz R, Muller RA, Schmitz RW, et al. (2013) SEI investigations on copper electrodes after lithium plating with Raman spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. J Power Sources 233: 110–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.105
![]() |
[198] |
Hy S, Felix F, Chen YH, et al. (2014) In situ surface enhanced Raman spectroscopic studies of solid electrolyte interphase formation in lithium ion battery electrodes. J Power Sources 256: 324–328. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.092
![]() |
[199] | Yamanaka T, Nakagawa H, Tsubouchi S, et al. (2017) In situ diagnosis of the electrolyte solution in a laminate lithium ion battery by using ultrafine multi-probe Raman spectroscopy. J Power Sources 359: 435–440. |
[200] |
Yamanaka T, Nakagawa H, Tsubouchi S, et al. (2017) In situ Raman spectroscopic studies on concentration change of electrolyte salt in a lithium ion model battery with closely faced graphite composite and LiCoO2 composite electrodes by using an ultrafine microprobe. Electrochim Acta 234: 93–98. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.060
![]() |
[201] |
Yamanaka T , Nakagawa H, Tsubouchi S, et al. (2017) Effects of pored separator films at the anode and cathode sides on concentration changes of electrolyte salt in lithium ion batteries. Jpn J Appl Phys 56: 128002. doi: 10.7567/JJAP.56.128002
![]() |
[202] |
Naudin C, Bruneel JL, Chami M, et al. (2003) Characterization of the lithium surface by infrared and Raman spectroscopies. J Power Sources 124: 518–525. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00798-5
![]() |
[203] |
Galloway TA, Cabo-Fernandez L, Aldous IM, et al. (2017) Shell isolated nanoparticles for enhanced Raman spectroscopy studies in lithium–oxygen cells. Faraday Discuss 205: 469–490. doi: 10.1039/C7FD00151G
![]() |
[204] |
Park Y, Kim Y, Kim SM, et al. (2017) Reaction at the electrolyte–electrode interface in a Li-ion battery studied by in situ Raman spectroscopy. Bull Korean Chem Soc 38: 511–513. doi: 10.1002/bkcs.11117
![]() |
[205] |
Yamanaka T, Nakagawa H, Tsubouchi S, et al. (2017) In situ Raman spectroscopic studies on concentration of electrolyte salt in lithium ion batteries by using ultrafine multifiber probes. ChemSusChem 10: 855–861. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201601473
![]() |
[206] | Lewis IR, Griffiths PR (1996) Raman spectrometry with fiber-optic sampling. Appl Spectrosc 50: 12A–30A. |
[207] |
Yamanaka T, Nakagawa H, Ochida M, et al. (2016) Ultrafine fiber Raman probe with high spatial resolution and fluorescence noise reduction. J Phys Chem C 120: 2585–2591. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11894
![]() |
[208] |
Yamanaka T, Nakagawa H, Tsubouchi S, et al. (2017) In situ Raman spectroscopic studies on concentration change of ions in the electrolyte solution in separator regions in a lithium ion battery by using multi-microprobes. Electrochem Commun 77: 32–35. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2017.01.020
![]() |
[209] |
Yamanaka T, Nakagawa H, Tsubouchi S, et al. (2017) Modification of the solid electrolyte interphase by chronoamperometric pretreatment and its effect on the concentration change of electrolyte salt in lithium ion batteries studied by in situ microprobe Raman spectroscopy. J Electrochem Soc 164: A2355–A2359. doi: 10.1149/2.0601712jes
![]() |