Citation: Mirela Domijan, Markus Kirkilionis. Graph theory and qualitative analysis of reaction networks[J]. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2008, 3(2): 295-322. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2008.3.295
[1] | Jin Liu, Botao Wang . A rigidity result for 2-dimensional λ-translators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 24947-24956. doi: 10.3934/math.20231272 |
[2] | Derya Sağlam, Cumali Sunar . Translation hypersurfaces of semi-Euclidean spaces with constant scalar curvature. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 5036-5048. doi: 10.3934/math.2023252 |
[3] | Kunquan Li . Analytical solutions and asymptotic behaviors to the vacuum free boundary problem for 2D Navier-Stokes equations with degenerate viscosity. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 12412-12432. doi: 10.3934/math.2024607 |
[4] | Rajesh Kumar, Sameh Shenawy, Lalnunenga Colney, Nasser Bin Turki . Certain results on tangent bundle endowed with generalized Tanaka Webster connection (GTWC) on Kenmotsu manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 30364-30383. doi: 10.3934/math.20241465 |
[5] | Tong Wu, Yong Wang . Super warped products with a semi-symmetric non-metric connection. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10534-10553. doi: 10.3934/math.2022587 |
[6] | Yayun Chen, Tongzhu Li . Classification of spacelike conformal Einstein hypersurfaces in Lorentzian space Rn+11. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 23247-23271. doi: 10.3934/math.20231182 |
[7] | Mingyu Zhang . On the Cauchy problem of 3D nonhomogeneous micropolar fluids with density-dependent viscosity. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 23313-23330. doi: 10.3934/math.20241133 |
[8] | Wenjing Song, Haiyun Deng, Ganshan Yang . Two-uniqueness of rational ghost soliton solution and well-posedness of perturbed Einstein-Yang-Mills equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 12065-12076. doi: 10.3934/math.2021699 |
[9] | Yanlin Li, Nasser Bin Turki, Sharief Deshmukh, Olga Belova . Euclidean hypersurfaces isometric to spheres. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 28306-28319. doi: 10.3934/math.20241373 |
[10] | Yongkun Li, Xiaoli Huang, Xiaohui Wang . Weyl almost periodic solutions for quaternion-valued shunting inhibitory cellular neural networks with time-varying delays. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 4861-4886. doi: 10.3934/math.2022271 |
Let (Mn,g) be an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold with the metric g and the dimension n≥3. If there exists a non-constant smooth function f such that
fij=f(Rij−1n−1Rgij), | (1.1) |
then (Mn,g,f) is called a vacuum static space (for more backgrounds, see [8,10,19,23]). Here fij, Rij and R denote components of the Hessian of f, the Ricci curvature tensor and the scalar curvature, respectively. In [8], Fischer-Marsden proposed the following conjecture: The standard spheres are the only n-dimensional compact vacuum static spaces. In [18], Kobayashi gave a classification for n-dimensional complete vacuum static spaces that are locally conformally flat. On the other hand, he and Lafontaine [20] also provided some counterexamples for the above conjecture.
In fact, according to the second Bianchi identity, any vacuum static space has constant scalar curvature. Moreover, Bourguignon [2] and Fischer-Marsden [8] have proved that the set f−1(0) has the measure zero and the set f−1(0) is a totally geodesic regular hypersurface.
Let ˚Rij=Rij−Rngij be the trace-free Ricci curvature, then (1.1) can be written as
fij=f˚Rij−Rn(n−1)fgij, | (1.2) |
which gives
Δf=−Rn−1f. |
It is well known that the Weyl curvature tensor W and the Riemannian curvature tensor is related by
Rijkl=Wijkl+1n−2(Rikgjl−Rilgjk+Rjlgik−Rjkgil)−R(n−1)(n−2)(gikgjl−gilgjk). |
In this paper, we consider rigidity results for closed vacuum static spaces. By using the maximum principle, some rigidity theorems are obtained under some pointwise inequalities and show that the squared norm of the Ricci curvature tensor is discrete.
Theorem 1.1. Let (Mn,g,f) be a closed vacuum static space with the positive scalar curvature and flWlijk=0 (that is, zero radial Weyl curvature), where n≥4. If
(n−1)(n−2)2|W|2+n(n−1)|˚Rij|2≤R2, | (1.3) |
then it must be of Einstein as long as there exists a point such that the inequality in (1.3) is strict.
Next, by substituting (1.3) with a stronger condition, we can obtain the following characterizations:
Theorem 1.2. Let (Mn,g,f) be a closed vacuum static space with the positive scalar curvature and flWlijk=0 (that is, zero radial Weyl curvature), where n≥4. If
√(n−1)(n−2)2|W|+√n(n−1)|˚Rij|≤R, | (1.4) |
then it must be of Einstein or a Riemannian product S1×Sn−1. In particular, it must be of Einstein as long as there exists a point such that the inequality in (1.4) is strict.
When W=0, the formula (2.1) shows that the Einstein metric with the positive scalar curvature must be of positive constant sectional curvature. Hence, Theorem 1.2 gives the following:
Corollary 1.3. Let (Mn,g,f) be a closed vacuum static space with the positive scalar curvature and W=0. If
|˚Rij|≤R√n(n−1), | (1.5) |
then it must be of either Sn with positive constant sectional curvature or a Riemannian product S1×Sn−1.
In particular, when n=3, we have W=0 automatically and Corollary 1.3 yields the following result (which has been proved by Ambrozio in [1, Theorem A]) immediately:
Corollary 1.4. Let (M3,g,f) be a closed vacuum static space with the positive scalar curvature. If
|˚Rij|≤1√6R, | (1.6) |
then it must be of either S3 with positive constant sectional curvature or a Riemannian product S1×S2.
Remark 1.1. It is easy to see that the condition (1.4) is stronger than (1.3). On the other hand, one can check that when Mn=S1×Sn−1, we have |˚Rij|=R√n(n−1), and when Mn=Sn, we have |˚Rij|=0. Hence, for closed vacuum static spaces with W=0, Corollary 1.3 gives the following pinching results: If 0≤|˚Rij|≤R√n(n−1), then |˚Rij|=0 or |˚Rij|=R√n(n−1). That is, the value of |˚Rij| is discrete.
Remark 1.2. Recently, by a generalized maximum principle, Cheng and Wei [6] considered the classifications for three-dimensional complete vacuum static spaces with constant squared norm of Ricci curvature tensor. For the classifications for closed cases, see [17,24,25,26] and the references therein.
It is well known that the Weyl curvature tensor and the Cotton tensor are defined respectively as follows:
Rijkl=Wijkl+1n−2(Rikgjl−Rilgjk+Rjlgik−Rjkgil)−R(n−1)(n−2)(gikgjl−gilgjk)=Wijkl+1n−2(˚Rikgjl−˚Rilgjk+˚Rjlgik−˚Rjkgil)+Rn(n−1)(gikgjl−gilgjk) | (2.1) |
and
Cijk=˚Rij,k−˚Rik,j+n−22n(n−1)(R,kgij−R,jgki). | (2.2) |
From (2.2), it is easy to see that Cijk is skew-symmetric with respect to the last two indices; that is, Cijk=−Cikj and is trace-free in any two indices:
Ciik=0=Ciji. | (2.3) |
In addition,
Cijk+Cjki+Ckij=0, | (2.4) |
and in using the Ricci identity, one has
Cilk,l=Ckli,l, Cijl,l=Cjil,l, Clij,l=0. | (2.5) |
Associated to (1.1), there is a (0.3)-tensor Tijk, which can be written as
Tijk=n−1n−2(˚Rikfj−˚Rijfk)+1n−2(gik˚Rjl−gij˚Rkl)fl. | (2.6) |
A direct calculation enables us to observe that T satisfies the following properties:
Tijk=−Tikj, Tiik=0=Tiji, |
Tijk+Tjki+Tkij=0. |
Moreover, the tensor Cijk is related to T by (see [3,4,11,15,25]):
fCijk=Tijk+flWlijk. | (2.7) |
Lemma 2.1. Let (Mn,g,f) be a vacuum static space with f satisfying (1.2). We have
Δfij=2f˚RmkWmijk+2nn−2f˚Rim˚Rmj+R2n(n−1)2fgij−2n−2f|˚Rkl|2gij+1n−1Rf˚Rij+fmCjmi+fm˚Rmi,j | (2.8) |
and
fΔ˚Rij=2f˚RmkWmijk+2nn−2f˚Rim˚Rmj−2n−2f|˚Rkl|2gij+fm(Cjmi+Cimj)+2Rn−1f˚Rij−fk˚Rij,k. | (2.9) |
Proof. By the Ricci identity, we have
fij,kl=fik,jl+(fmRmijk),l=fik,jl+fmlRmijk+fmRmijk,l=fik,lj+fmkRmijl+fimRmkjl+fmlRmijk+fmRmijk,l=fkl,ij+(fmRmkil),j+fmkRmijl+fimRmkjl+fmlRmijk+fmRmijk,l=fkl,ij+fmjRmkil+fmkRmijl+fimRmkjl+fmlRmijk+fmRmijk,l+fmRmkil,j, |
which gives
Δfij=fij,kk=(Δf),ij+fmjRmi+2fmkRmijk+fimRmj+fmRmijk,k+fmRmi,j. | (2.10) |
Since the scalar curvature R is constant, then
(Δf),ij=−1n−1Rf[˚Rij−Rn(n−1)gij], |
fmjRmi=[f˚Rmj−Rn(n−1)fgmj](˚Rmi+Rngmi)=f˚Rim˚Rmj+n−2n(n−1)Rf˚Rij−R2n2(n−1)fgij, |
which is equivalent to
fmj˚Rmi=f˚Rim˚Rmj−Rn(n−1)f˚Rij, |
fmkRmijk=fmk[Wmijk+1n−2(˚Rmjgik−˚Rmkgij+˚Rikgmj−˚Rijgmk)+Rn(n−1)(gmjgik−gmkgij)]=f˚RmkWmijk+1n−2[fik˚Rkj+fjk˚Rki−fmk˚Rmkgij−(Δf)˚Rij]+Rn(n−1)[fij−(Δf)gij]=f˚RmkWmijk+1n−2[2f˚Rim˚Rmj−2Rn(n−1)f˚Rij−f|˚Rkl|2gij+Rn−1f˚Rij]+Rn(n−1)[f˚Rij+Rnfgij]. |
In particular, by virtue of the second Bianchi identity, we have
Rjkim,m=Rij,k−Rik,j=Cijk, |
where, in the last equality, we used the formula (2.2) since the scalar curvature R is constant. Thus, we obtain
Δfij=−1n−1R[f˚Rij−Rn(n−1)fgij]+2f˚Rim˚Rmj+2(n−2)n(n−1)Rf˚Rij−2R2n2(n−1)fgij+2f˚RmkWmijk+2n−2[2f˚Rim˚Rmj−2n(n−1)Rf˚Rij−f|˚Rkl|2gij+Rn−1f˚Rij]+2Rn(n−1)[f˚Rij+Rnfgij]+fmCjmi+fm˚Rmi,j=2f˚RmkWmijk+2nn−2f˚Rim˚Rmj+R2n(n−1)2fgij−2n−2f|˚Rkl|2gij+1n−1Rf˚Rij+fmCjmi+fm˚Rmi,j, | (2.11) |
and the formula (2.8) is achieved.
From (1.2), we have
f˚Rij,k=fij,k−fk˚Rij+Rn(n−1)fkgij, | (2.12) |
fl˚Rij,k+f˚Rij,kl=fij,kl−fkl˚Rij−fk˚Rij,l+Rn(n−1)fklgij. | (2.13) |
Therefore,
fΔ˚Rij=f˚Rij,kk=Δfij−(Δf)˚Rij−2fk˚Rij,k+Rn(n−1)(Δf)gij=2f˚RmkWmijk+2nn−2f˚Rim˚Rmj−2n−2f|˚Rkl|2gij+fm(Cjmi+Cimj)+2Rn−1f˚Rij−fk˚Rij,k. | (2.14) |
The proof of Lemma 2.1 is completed.
Lemma 2.2. Let (Mn,g,f) be a vacuum static space with f satisfying (1.2). If flWlijk=0 (that is, zero radial Weyl curvature), then
12fΔ|˚Rij|2+12∇f∇|˚Rij|2=f˚R2ij,k+2fWmijk˚Rij˚Rmk+2nn−2f˚Rim˚Rmj˚Rji+n−2n−1f|Cijk|2+2Rn−1f|˚Rij|2. | (2.15) |
Proof Using (2.9), we have
12fΔ|˚Rij|2+12∇f∇|˚Rij|2=f˚R2ij,k+f˚RijΔ˚Rij+fk˚Rij˚Rij,k=f˚R2ij,k+2fWmijk˚Rij˚Rmk+2nn−2f˚Rim˚Rmj˚Rij+(Cjmi+Cimj)˚Rijfm+2Rn−1f|˚Rij|2=f˚R2ij,k+2fWmijk˚Rij˚Rmk+2nn−2f˚Rim˚Rmj˚Rji−2Cijk˚Rijfk+2Rn−1f|˚Rij|2. | (2.16) |
Since flWlijk=0, then (2.7) gives
fCijk=Tijk |
and
fCijk˚Rijfk=Tijk˚Rijfk=[n−1n−2(˚Rikfj−˚Rijfk)+1n−2(gik˚Rjl−gij˚Rkl)fl]˚Rijfk=nn−2˚Rki˚Rkjfifj−n−1n−2|˚Rij|2|∇f|2. | (2.17) |
On the other hand,
f2|Cijk|2=|Tijk|2=|n−1n−2(˚Rikfj−˚Rijfk)+1n−2(gik˚Rjl−gij˚Rkl)fl|2=−2n(n−1)(n−2)2˚Rki˚Rkjfifj+2(n−1)2(n−2)2|˚Rij|2|∇f|2. | (2.18) |
Combining (2.17) and (2.18), we achieve
−2(n−1)Cijk˚Rijfk=(n−2)f|Cijk|2. |
Thus, (2.16) becomes
12fΔ|˚Rij|2+12∇f∇|˚Rij|2=f˚R2ij,k+2fWmijk˚Rij˚Rmk+2nn−2f˚Rim˚Rmj˚Rji+n−2n−1f|Cijk|2+2Rn−1f|˚Rij|2, | (2.19) |
and the formula (2.15) is attained.
We also need the following lemma (see [9,13,14,21]):
Lemma 2.3. For any ρ∈R, the following estimate holds:
|−Wijkl˚Rjl˚Rik+ρn−2˚Rij˚Rjk˚Rki|≤√n−22(n−1)(|W|2+2ρ2n(n−2)|˚Rij|2)12|˚Rij|2. | (2.20) |
Multiplying both sides of (2.15) with f, we have
12f2Δ|˚Rij|2+12f∇f∇|˚Rij|2=f2˚R2ij,k+2f2Wmijk˚Rij˚Rmk+2nn−2f2˚Rim˚Rmj˚Rji+n−2n−1f2|Cijk|2+2Rn−1f2|˚Rij|2. | (3.1) |
Since the manifold is closed, then (3.1) together with (2.20) yields
12f2Δ|˚Rij|2+12f∇f∇|˚Rij|2≥f2(˚R2ij,k+n−2n−1|Cijk|2)+2f2[Rn−1−√n−22(n−1)(|W|2+2nn−2|˚Rij|2)12]|˚Rij|2. | (3.2) |
Therefore, under the assumption (1.3), it follows from (3.2) that
12f2Δ|˚Rij|2+12f∇f∇|˚Rij|2≥f2(˚R2ij,k+n−2n−1|Cijk|2)+2f2[Rn−1−√n−22(n−1)(|W|2+2nn−2|˚Rij|2)12]|˚Rij|2≥0, | (3.3) |
which shows that |˚Rij|2 is subharmonic on Mn. Using the maximum principle, we obtain that |˚Rij| is constant and ˚Rij,k=0. In this case, (3.3) becomes
[Rn−1−√n−22(n−1)(|W|2+2nn−2|˚Rij|2)12]|˚Rij|2=0. | (3.4) |
If there exists a point x0 such that (1.3) is strict, then from (3.4) we have |˚Rij|(x0)=0, which with |˚Rij| constant shows that ˚Rij≡0. That is, the metric is Einstein and the proof of Theorem 1.1 is completed.
We recall the following inequality, which was first proved by Huisken (cf. [16, Lemma 3.4]):
|Wikjl˚Rij˚Rkl|≤√n−22(n−1)|W||˚Rij|2 | (3.5) |
and
|˚Rij˚Rjk˚Rki|≤n−2√n(n−1)|˚Rij|3, | (3.6) |
with the equality in (3.6) at some point p∈M if, and only if, ˚Rij can be diagonalized at p and the eigenvalue multiplicity of ˚Rij is at least n−1 [12,22]. Thus, from (2.15), we obtain
12f2Δ|˚Rij|2+12f∇f∇|˚Rij|2≥f2(˚R2ij,k+n−2n−1|Cijk|2−√2(n−2)n−1|W||˚Rij|2−2√nn−1|˚Rij|3+2Rn−1|˚Rij|2)=f2(˚R2ij,k+n−2n−1|Cijk|2)+2f2(Rn−1−√n−22(n−1)|W|−√nn−1|˚Rij|)|˚Rij|2. |
Similarly, under the assumption (1.4), we obtain
12f2Δ|˚Rij|2+12f∇f∇|˚Rij|2≥f2(˚R2ij,k+n−2n−1|Cijk|2)+2f2(Rn−1−√n−22(n−1)|W|−√nn−1|˚Rij|)|˚Rij|2≥0, | (3.7) |
which shows that |˚Rij|2 is subharmonic on Mn. Using the maximum principle again, we obtain that |˚Rij| is constant and ˚Rij,k=0. In this case, (3.7) becomes
(Rn−1−√n−22(n−1)|W|−√nn−1|˚Rij|)|˚Rij|2=0 | (3.8) |
and the equalities in (3.5) and (3.6) occur.
In particular, writing ˚Rij=agij+bvivj at p with some scalars a,b and a vector v, we see that the left hand side of (3.5) is zero [12] at every point p. As (3.5) is an equality and, according to [7], g is real-analytic, the metric g must be conformally flat or Einstein.
If there exists a point x0 such that (1.4) is strict, then from (3.8) we have |˚Rij|(x0)=0. Which with |˚Rij| constant shows that ˚Rij≡0 and the metric is Einstein. Otherwise, we have that the equality in (1.4) occurs and
√(n−1)(n−2)2|W|+√n(n−1)|˚Rij|=R. | (3.9) |
In this case, we have W=0 and (3.9) becomes |˚Rij|=R√n(n−1), and then Mn=S1×Sn−1 [5].
Therefore, we complete the proof of Theorem 1.2.
The aim of this paper is to study rigidity results for closed vacuum static spaces. The main tool is to apply the maximum principle to the function |˚Rij|2 since the manifolds are closed. More precisely, we obtain rigidity theorems by establishing some pointwise inequalities and applying the maximum principle, which further proves that the squared norm of the Ricci curvature tensor is discrete.
The authors declare that they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
The authors would like to thank the referee for valuable suggestions, which made the paper more readable. The research of the authors is supported by NSFC(No. 11971153) and Key Scientific Research Project for Colleges and Universities in Henan Province (No. 23A110007).
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
1. | Guangyue Huang, Qi Guo, Bingqing Ma, Rigidity of closed vacuum static spaces, 2025, 98, 09262245, 102217, 10.1016/j.difgeo.2024.102217 |