High-fat diets have been associated with lower gut and fecal abundances of genus Bifidobacterium. Here, we investigated whether commonly consumed dietary free fatty acids have any detrimental effect on the growth of B. adolescentis, B. bifidum, and B. longum. We found that the presence of free fatty acids in the medium inhibits the growth of Bifidobacterium species to a varying degree, with capric (C10:0), oleic (C18:1), and linoleic (C18:2) acids displaying the largest effect. In comparison, free fatty acids did not affect the growth of Escherichia coli. When fats were added as a mixture of mono- and diacylglycerols, the inhibitory effect on Bifidobacterium growth was abolished.
Citation: Sergio Perez-Burillo, Sumudu Rajakaruna, Oleg Paliy. Growth of Bifidobacterium species is inhibited by free fatty acids and bile salts but not by glycerides[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2022, 8(1): 53-60. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2022005
[1] | Ghulam Farid, Maja Andrić, Maryam Saddiqa, Josip Pečarić, Chahn Yong Jung . Refinement and corrigendum of bounds of fractional integral operators containing Mittag-Leffler functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 7332-7349. doi: 10.3934/math.2020469 |
[2] | Hengxiao Qi, Muhammad Yussouf, Sajid Mehmood, Yu-Ming Chu, Ghulam Farid . Fractional integral versions of Hermite-Hadamard type inequality for generalized exponentially convexity. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6030-6042. doi: 10.3934/math.2020386 |
[3] | Ghulam Farid, Saira Bano Akbar, Shafiq Ur Rehman, Josip Pečarić . Boundedness of fractional integral operators containing Mittag-Leffler functions via (s,m)-convexity. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 966-978. doi: 10.3934/math.2020067 |
[4] | Ye Yue, Ghulam Farid, Ayșe Kübra Demirel, Waqas Nazeer, Yinghui Zhao . Hadamard and Fejér-Hadamard inequalities for generalized k-fractional integrals involving further extension of Mittag-Leffler function. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 681-703. doi: 10.3934/math.2022043 |
[5] | Maryam Saddiqa, Ghulam Farid, Saleem Ullah, Chahn Yong Jung, Soo Hak Shim . On Bounds of fractional integral operators containing Mittag-Leffler functions for generalized exponentially convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 6454-6468. doi: 10.3934/math.2021379 |
[6] | Yue Wang, Ghulam Farid, Babar Khan Bangash, Weiwei Wang . Generalized inequalities for integral operators via several kinds of convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4624-4643. doi: 10.3934/math.2020297 |
[7] | Wenfeng He, Ghulam Farid, Kahkashan Mahreen, Moquddsa Zahra, Nana Chen . On an integral and consequent fractional integral operators via generalized convexity. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 7632-7648. doi: 10.3934/math.2020488 |
[8] | Maryam Saddiqa, Saleem Ullah, Ferdous M. O. Tawfiq, Jong-Suk Ro, Ghulam Farid, Saira Zainab . k-Fractional inequalities associated with a generalized convexity. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 28540-28557. doi: 10.3934/math.20231460 |
[9] | Ghulam Farid, Hafsa Yasmeen, Hijaz Ahmad, Chahn Yong Jung . Riemann-Liouville Fractional integral operators with respect to increasing functions and strongly (α,m)-convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 11403-11424. doi: 10.3934/math.2021661 |
[10] | Sabir Hussain, Rida Khaliq, Sobia Rafeeq, Azhar Ali, Jongsuk Ro . Some fractional integral inequalities involving extended Mittag-Leffler function with applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 35599-35625. doi: 10.3934/math.20241689 |
High-fat diets have been associated with lower gut and fecal abundances of genus Bifidobacterium. Here, we investigated whether commonly consumed dietary free fatty acids have any detrimental effect on the growth of B. adolescentis, B. bifidum, and B. longum. We found that the presence of free fatty acids in the medium inhibits the growth of Bifidobacterium species to a varying degree, with capric (C10:0), oleic (C18:1), and linoleic (C18:2) acids displaying the largest effect. In comparison, free fatty acids did not affect the growth of Escherichia coli. When fats were added as a mixture of mono- and diacylglycerols, the inhibitory effect on Bifidobacterium growth was abolished.
The theory of inequalities of convex functions is part of the general subject of convexity since a convex function is one whose epigraph is a convex set. Nonetheless it is a theory important per se, which touches almost all branches of mathematics. Probably, the first topic who make necessary the encounter with this theory is the graphical analysis. With this occasion we learn on the second derivative test of convexity, a powerful tool in recognizing convexity. Then comes the problem of finding the extremal values of functions of several variables and the use of Hessian as a higher dimensional generalization of the second derivative. Passing to optimization problems in infinite dimensional spaces is the next step, but despite the technical sophistication in handling such problems, the basic ideas are pretty similar with those underlying the one variable case.
The objective of this paper is to present the fractional Hadamard and Fejér-Hadamard inequalities in generalized forms. We start from the integral operators containing generalized Mittag-Leffler function defined by Prabhaker in [25].
Definition 1.1. Let σ,τ,ρ be positive real numbers and ω∈R. Then the generalized fractional integral operators containing Mittag-Leffler function ϵρσ,τ,ω,a+f and ϵρσ,τ,ω,b−f for a real valued continuous function f are defined by:
(ϵρσ,τ,ω,a+f)(x)=∫xa(x−t)τ−1Eρσ,τ(ω(x−t)σ)f(t)dt, | (1.1) |
(ϵρσ,τ,ω,b−f)(x)=∫bx(t−x)τ−1Eρσ,τ(ω(t−x)σ)f(t)dt, | (1.2) |
where the function Eρσ,τ(t) is the generalized Mittag-Leffler function; Eρσ,τ(t)=∑∞n=0(ρ)ntnΓ(σn+τ)n! and (ρ)n=Γ(ρ+n)Γ(ρ).
Fractional integral operators associated with generalized Mittag-Leffler function play a vital role in fractional calculus. Different fractional integral operators have different types of properties and these integral operators may be singular or non-singular depending upon their kernels. For example, the global Riemann Liouville integral is a singular integral operator but the singularity is integrable. Some new models [2,7] have been designed due to the non-singularity of their defining integrals. Fractional integral operators are useful in the generalization of classical mathematical concepts. Fractional integral operators are very fruitful in obtaining fascinating and glorious results, for example fractional order systems and fractional differential equations are used in physical and mathematical phenomena. Many inequalities like Hadamard are studied in the context of fractional calculus operators, see [1,6,8,20,28].
After the existence of Prabhaker fractional integral operators, the researchers began to think in this direction and consequently they further generalized and extended these operators in different ways for instance see [14,18,23,29], and references therein. By using the Mittag-Leffler function these fractional integral operators are generalized by many authors. In [27] Salim and Faraj defined the following fractional integral operators involving an extended Mittag-Leffler function in the kernel.
Definition 1.2. Let σ,τ,k,δ,ρ be positive real numbers and ω∈R. Then the generalized fractional integral operators containing Mittag-Leffler function ϵρ,r,kσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f and ϵρ,r,kσ,τ,δ,ω,b−f for a real valued continuous function f are defined by:
(ϵρ,r,kσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f)(x)=∫xa(x−t)τ−1Eρ,r,kσ,τ,δ(ω(x−t)σ)f(t)dt, | (1.3) |
(ϵρ,r,kσ,τ,δ,ω,b−f)(x)=∫bx(t−x)τ−1Eρ,r,kσ,τ,δ(ω(t−x)σ)f(t)dt, | (1.4) |
where the function Eρ,r,kσ,τ,δ(t) is the generalized Mittag-Leffler function; Eρ,r,kσ,τ,δ(t)=∑∞n=0(ρ)kntnΓ(σn+τ)(r)δn and (ρ)kn=Γ(ρ+kn)Γ(ρ).
Further fractional integral operators containing an extended generalized Mittag-Leffler function in their kernels are defined as follows:
Definition 1.3. [18] Let ω,τ,δ,ρ,c∈C, p,σ,r≥0 and 0<k≤r+σ. Let f∈L1[a,b] and x∈[a,b]. Then the generalized fractional integral operators ϵρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f and ϵρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,b−f are defined by:
(ϵρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f)(x;p)=∫xa(x−t)τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(x−t)σ;p)f(t)dt, | (1.5) |
(ϵρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,b−f)(x;p)=∫bx(t−x)τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(t−x)σ;p)f(t)dt, | (1.6) |
where
Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(t;p)=∞∑n=0βp(ρ+nk,c−ρ)(c)nktnβ(ρ,c−ρ)Γ(σn+τ)(δ)nr, | (1.7) |
is the extended generalized Mittag-Leffler function.
Recently, Farid et al. defined a unified integral operator in [14] (see also [22]) as follows:
Definition 1.4. Let f,g:[a,b]→R, 0<a<b be the functions such that f be positive and f∈L1[a,b] and g be a differentiable and strictly increasing. Also let ϕx be an increasing function on [a,∞) and ω,τ,δ,ρ,c∈C, ℜ(τ),ℜ(δ)>0, ℜ(c)>ℜ(ρ)>0 with p≥0, σ,r>0 and 0<k≤r+σ. Then for x∈[a,b] the integral operators (gFϕ,ρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f) and (gFϕ,ρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,b−f) are defined by:
(gFϕ,ρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f)(x;p)=∫xaϕ(g(x)−g(t))g(x)−g(t)Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(x)−g(t))σ;p)f(t)d(g(t)), | (1.8) |
(gFϕ,ρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,b−f)(x;p)=∫bxϕ(g(t)−g(x))g(t)−g(x)Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(t)−g(x))σ;p)f(t)d(g(t)). | (1.9) |
The following definition of generalized fractional integral operator containing extended Mittag-Leffler function in the kernel can be extracted by setting ϕ(x)=xτ in Definition 1.4.
Definition 1.5. Let f,g:[a,b]→R, 0<a<b be the functions such that f be positive and f∈L1[a,b] and g be a differentiable and strictly increasing. Also let ω,τ,δ,ρ,c∈C, ℜ(τ),ℜ(δ)>0, ℜ(c)>ℜ(ρ)>0 with p≥0, σ,r>0 and 0<k≤r+σ. Then for x∈[a,b] the integral operators are defined by:
(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f)(x;p)=∫xa(g(x)−g(t))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(x)−g(t))σ;p)f(t)d(g(t)), | (1.10) |
(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,b−f)(x;p)=∫bx(g(t)−g(x))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(t)−g(x))σ;p)f(t)d(g(t)). | (1.11) |
The following remark provides some connection of Definition 1.5 with already known operators:
Remark 1. (ⅰ) If we take p=0 and g(x)=x in equation (1.10), then it reduces to the fractional integral operators defined by Salim and Faraj in [27].
(ⅱ) If we take δ=r=1 and g(x)=x in (1.10), then it reduces to the fractional integral operators gΥρ,1,k,cσ,τ,1,ω,a+ and gΥρ,1,k,cσ,τ,1,ω,b− containing generalized Mittag-Leffler function Eρ,1,k,cσ,τ,1(t;p) defined by Rahman et al. in [26].
(ⅲ) If we set p=0,δ=r=1 and g(x)=x in (1.10), then it reduces to integral operators containing extended generalized Mittag-Leffler function introduced by Srivastava and Tomovski in [29].
(ⅳ) If we take p=0,δ=r=k=1 and g(x)=x, (1.10) reduces to integral operators defined by Prabhaker in [25] containing generalized Mittag-Leffler function.
(ⅴ) For p=ω=0 and g(x)=x in (1.10), then generalized fractional integral operators gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+ and gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,b− reduce to Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operators.
Our aim in this paper is to establish Hadamard and Fejér-Hadamard inequalities for generalized fractional integral operators containing extended generalized Mittag-Leffler function for a monotone increasing function via m-convex functions.
More than a hundred years ago, the mathematicians introduced the convexity and they established a lot of inequalities for the class of convex functions. The convex functions are playing a significant and a tremendous role in fractional calculus. Convexity has been widely employed in many branches of mathematics, for instance, in mathematical analysis, optimization theory, function theory, functional analysis and so on. Recently, many authors and researchers have given their attention to the generalizations, extensions, refinements of convex functions in multi-directions.
Definition 1.6. A function f:[a,b]→R is said to be convex if
f(tx+(1−t)y)≤tf(x)+(1−t)f(y) |
holds for all x,y∈[a,b] and t∈[0,1].
The m-convex function is a close generalization of convex function and its concept was introduced by Toader [30].
Definition 1.7. A function f:[0,b]→R, b>0 is said to be m-convex if for all x,y∈[0,b] and t∈[0,1]
f(tx+m(1−t)y)≤tf(x)+m(1−t)f(y) |
holds for m∈[0,1].
If we take m=1, we get the definition for convex function. An m-convex function need not be a convex function.
Example 1. [24] A function f:[0,∞)→R defined by f(x)=x4−5x3+9x2−5x is 1617-convex but it is not m-convex for m∈(1617,1].
A lot of results and inequalities pertaining to convex, m-convex and related functions have been produced (see, [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] and references therein). Many fractional integral inequalities like Hadamard and Fejér-Hadamard are very important and researchers have produced their generalizations and refinements (see, [5] and references therein). Fractional inequalities have many applications, for instance, the most fruitful ones are used in establishing uniqueness of solutions of fractional boundary value problems and fractional partial differential equations. For instance the following Hadamard inequality is given in [21]:
Theorem 1.8. Let f:[0,∞)→R, be positive real function. Let a,b∈[0,∞) with a<mb and f∈L1[a,mb]. If f is m-convex on [a,mb], then the following inequalities for the extended generalized fractional integrals hold:
f(a+mb2)(ϵω′,ρ,r,k,ca+,σ,τ,δ1)(mb;p)≤(ϵω′,ρ,r,k,ca+,σ,τ,δf)(mb;p)+mτ+1(ϵmσω′,ρ,r,k,cb−,σ,τ,δf)(am;p)2≤mτ+12[f(a)−m2f(am2)mb−a(ϵmσω′,ρ,r,k,cb−,σ,τ+1,δ1)(am;p)+(f(b)+mf(am2))(ϵmσω′,ρ,r,k,cb−,σ,τ,δ1)(am;p)],ω′=ω(mb−a)σ. |
In the upcoming section we will derive the Hadamard inequality for m-convex functions by means of fractional integrals (1.10) and (1.11). This version of the Hadamard inequality gives at once the Hadamard inequalities quoted in Section 2. Further we will establish the Fejér-Hadamard inequality for these operators of m-convex functions which will provide the corresponding inequalities proved in [31]. Moreover in Section 3 by establishing two identities error estimations of the Hadamard and the Fejér-Hadamard inequalities are obtained.
Theorem 2.1. Let f,g:[a,b]→R, 0<a<b, Range (g) ⊂[a,b], be the functions such that f be positive and f∈L1[a,b], g be differentiable and strictly increasing. If f be m-convex m∈(0,1] and g(a)<mg(b), then the following inequalities for fractional operators (1.10) and (1.11) hold:
f(g(a)+mg(b)2)(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,a+1)(g−1(mg(b));p)≤(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,a+(f∘g))(g−1(mg(b));p)+mτ+1(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,mσω′,b−(f∘g))(g−1(g(a)m);p)2≤mτ+12[f(g(a))−m2f(g(a)m2)mg(b)−g(a)(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ+1,δ,mσω′,b−1)(g−1(g(a)m);p)+(f(g(b))+mf(g(a)m2))(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,mσω′,b−1)(g−1(g(a)m);p)],ω′=ω(mg(b)−g(a))σ. |
Proof. By definition of m-convex function f, we have
2f(g(a)+mg(b)2)≤f(tg(a)+m(1−t)g(b))+mf(tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m). | (2.1) |
Further from (2.1), one can obtain the following integral inequality:
2f(g(a)+mg(b)2)∫10tτ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p)dt≤∫10tτ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p)f(tg(a)+m(1−t)g(b))dt+m∫10tτ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p)f(tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m)dt. | (2.2) |
Setting g(x)=tg(a)+m(1−t)g(b) and g(y)=tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m in (2.2), we get the following inequality:
2f(g(a)+mg(b)2)(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,a+1)(g−1(mg(b));p)≤(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,a+(f∘g))(g−1(mg(b));p)+mτ+1(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,mσω′,b−(f∘g))(g−1(g(a)m);p). | (2.3) |
Also by using the m-convexity of f, one can has
f(tg(a)+m(1−t)g(b))+mf(tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m)≤m(f(g(b))+mf(g(a)m2))+(f(g(a))−m2f(g(a)m2))t. | (2.4) |
This leads to the following integral inequality:
∫10tτ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p)f(tg(a)+m(1−t)g(b))dt+m∫10tτ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p)f(tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m)dt≤m(f(g(b))+mf(g(a)m2))∫10tτ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p)dt+(f(g(a))−m2f(g(a)m2))∫10tτEρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p)dt. | (2.5) |
Again by setting g(x)=tg(a)+m(1−t)g(b), g(y)=tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m in (2.5) and after calculation, we get
(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,a+(f∘g))(g−1(mg(b));p)+mτ+1(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,mσω′,b−(f∘g))(g−1(g(a)m);p)≤mτ+1(f(g(a))−m2f(g(a)m2)mg(b)−g(a)(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ+1,δ,mσω′,b−1)(g−1(g(a)m);p)+(f(g(b))+mf(g(a)m2))(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,mσω′,b−1)(g−1(g(a)m);p)). | (2.6) |
Combining (2.3) and (2.6) we get the desired result.
Remark 2. ● In Theorem 2.1, if we put m=1, we get [31,Theorem 3.1]
● In Theorem 2.1, if we put g=I, we get [21,Theorem 3.1].
The following theorem gives the Fejér-Hadamard inequality for m-convex functions.
Theorem 2.2. Let f,g,h:[a,b]→R, 0<a<b, Range (g), be the functions such that f be positive and f∈L1[a,b], g be a differentiable and strictly increasing and h be integrable and non-negative. If f is m-convex, m∈(0,1], g(a)<mg(b) and g(a)+mg(b)−mg(x)=g(x), then the following inequalities for fractional operator (1.11) hold:
2f(g(a)+mg(b)2)(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,mb−h∘g)(g−1(g(a)m);p)≤(1+m)(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,b−(f∘g)(h∘g))(g−1(g(a)m);p)≤f(g(a))−m2f(g(a)m2)(g(b)−g(a)m)(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,b−h∘g)(g−1(g(a)m);p)+m(f(g(b))+mf(g(a)m2))(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,b−h∘g)(g−1(g(a)m);p),ω′=ω(g(b)−g(a)m)σ. |
Proof. Multiplying both sides of (2.1) by 2tτ−1h(tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m)Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p) and integrating on [0,1], we get
2f(g(a)+mg(b)2)∫10tτ−1h(tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m)Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p)dt≤∫10tτ−1h(tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m)Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p)f(tg(a)+m(1−t)g(b))dt+m∫10tτ−1h(tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m)Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p)f(tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m)dt. | (2.7) |
Setting g(x)=tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m and also using g(a)+mg(b)−mg(x)=g(x) the following inequality is obtained:
2f(g(a)+mg(b)2)(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,b−h∘g)(g−1(g(a)m);p)≤(1+m)(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,b−(f∘g)(h∘g))(g−1(g(a)m);p). | (2.8) |
Multiplying both sides of inequality (2.4) with tτ−1h(tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m)Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ωtσ;p) and integrating on [0,1], then setting g(x)=tg(b)+(1−t)g(a)m and also using g(a)+mg(b)−mg(x)=g(x) we have
(1+m)(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,b−(f∘g)(h∘g))(g−1(g(a)m);p)≤(f(g(a))−m2f(g(a)m2))g((b)−g(a)m)(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,b−h∘g)(g−1(g(a)m);p)+m(f(g(b))+mf(g(a)m2))(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω′,b−h∘g)(g−1(g(a)m);p). | (2.9) |
Combining (2.8) and (2.9) we get the desired result.
Remark 3. ● In Theorem 2.2, if we put m=1, then we get [31,Theorem 3.2].
● In Theorem 2.2, if we put g=I and p=0, then we get results of [3].
● In Theorem 2.2, if we put g=I, then we get results of [4].
To find error estimates first we prove the following two lemmas.
Lemma 3.1. Let f,g:[a,mb]→R, 0<a<mb, Range (g) ⊂[a,mb] be the functions such that f be positive and f∘g∈L1[a,mb] and g be a differentiable and strictly increasing. Also if f(g(x))=f(g(a)+g(mb)−g(x)), then the following equality for fractional operators (1.10) and (1.11) holds:
(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f∘g)(mb;p)=(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−f∘g)(a;p)=(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f∘g)(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−f∘g)(a;p)2. | (3.1) |
Proof. By Definition 1.5 of the generalized fractional integral operator containing extended generalized Mittag-Leffler function, we have
(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f∘g)(mb;p)=∫mba(g(mb)−g(x))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(x))σ;p)f(g(x))d(g(x)). | (3.2) |
Replacing g(x) by g(a)+g(mb)−g(x) in (3.2) and using f(g(x))=f(g(a)+g(mb)−g(x)), we have
(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f∘g)(mb;p)=∫mba(g(x)−g(a))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(x)−g(a))σ;p)f(g(x))d(g(x)). |
This implies
(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+f∘g)(mb;p)=(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−f∘g)(a;p). | (3.3) |
By adding (3.2) and (3.3), we get (3.1).
Lemma 3.2. Let f,g,h:[a,mb]→R, 0<a<mb, Range (g), Range (h) ⊂[a,mb] be the functions such that f be positive and f∘g,h∘g∈L1[a,mb], g be a differentiable and strictly increasing and h be non-negative and continuous. If f′∘g∈L1[a,mb] and h(g(t))=h(g(a)+g(mb)−g(t)), then the following equality for the generalized fractional integral operators (1.10) and (1.11) holds:
f(g(a))+f(g(mb))2[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+h∘g)(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−h∘g)(a;p)] | (3.4) |
−[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+(f∘g)(h∘g))(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−(f∘g)(h∘g))(a;p)]=∫mba[∫ta(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))−∫mbt(g(s)−g(a))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(s)−g(a))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))]f′(g(t))d(g(t)). |
Proof. To prove the lemma, we have
∫mba[∫ta(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))]f′(g(t))d(g(t))=f(g(mb))∫mba(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))−∫mba((g(mb)−g(t))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(t))σ;p))f(g(t))h(g(t))d(g(t))=f(g(mb))(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+h∘g)(mb;p)−(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+(f∘g)(h∘g))(mb;p). |
By using Lemma 3.1, we have
∫mba[∫ta(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))]f′(g(t))d(g(t))=f(g(mb))2[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+h∘g)(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−h∘g)(a;p)](gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+(f∘g)(h∘g))(mb;p). |
In the same way we have
∫mba[−∫mbt(g(s)−g(a))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(s)−g(a))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))]f′(g(t))d(g(t))=f(g(a))2[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+h∘g)(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−h∘g)(a;p)](gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−(f∘g)(h∘g))(a;p). |
By adding (3.5) and (3.5), we get (3.4).
By using Lemma 3.2, we prove the following theorem.
Theorem 3.3. Let f,g,h:[a,mb]→R, 0<a<mb, Range (g), Range (h) ⊂[a,mb] be the functions such that f be positive and (f∘g)′∈L1[a,mb], where g be a differentiable and strictly increasing and h be non-negative and continuous. Also let h(g(t))=h(g(a)+g(mb)−g(t)) and |(f∘g)′| is m-convex on [a,b]. Then for k<r+ℜ(σ), the following inequality for fractional integral operators (1.10) and (1.11) holds:
|f(g(a))+f(g(mb))2[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+h∘g)(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−h∘g)(a;p)]−[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+(f∘g)(h∘g))(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−(f∘g)(h∘g))(a;p)]|≤∥h∥∞M(g(mb)−g(a))τ+1τ(τ+1)(1−Ω)[|f′(g(a))+mf′(g(b))|], | (3.5) |
where ∥h∥∞=supt∈[a,mb]|h(t)| and
Ω=1τ+2[{(g(a+mb2)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a))τ+2}+{(g(mb)−g(a+mb2)g(mb)−g(a))τ+2}]
−τ+1τ+2[{(g(a+mb2)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a))τ+2}+{(g(mb)−g(a+mb2)g(mb)−g(a))τ+2}]
−(g(a+mb2)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a))τ+1(g(mb)−g(a+mb2)g(mb)−g(a))+(g(a+mb2)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a))(g(mb)−g(a+mb2)g(mb)−g(a))τ+1.
Proof. Using Lemma 3.2, we have
|(f(g(a))+f(g(mb))2)[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+h∘g)(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−h∘g)(a;p)]−[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+(f∘g)(h∘g))(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−(f∘g)(h∘g))(a;p)]|≤∫mba|[∫ta(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))−∫mbt(g(s)−g(a))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(s)−g(a))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))]||f′(g(t))|d(g(t)). | (3.6) |
Using the m-convexity of |(f∘g)′| on [a,b], we have
|f′(g(t))|≤g(mb)−g(t)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(a))|+mg(t)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(b))|,t∈[a,b]. | (3.7) |
If we replace g(s) by g(a)+g(mb)−g(s) and using h(g(s))=h(g(a)+g(mb)−g(s)), t′=g−1(g(a)+g(mb)−g(t)), in second integral in the followings, we get
|∫ta(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))−∫mbt(g(s)−g(a))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(s)−g(a))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))|=|−∫at(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))−∫t′a(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))|=|∫t′t(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))| |
≤{∫t′t|(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))|d(g(s)),t∈[a,a+mb2] ∫tt′|(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))|d(g(s)),t∈[a+mb2,mb]. | (3.8) |
By (3.6)–(3.8) and using absolute convergence of extended Mittag-Leffler function, we have
|f(g(a))+f(g(mb))2((gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+h∘g)(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−h∘g)(a;p))−[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+(f∘g)(h∘g))(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−(f∘g)(h∘g))(a;p)]|≤∫a+mb2a(∫a+mb−ta|(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))|d(g(s)))×(g(mb)−g(t)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(a))|+mg(t)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(b))|)d(g(t))+∫mba+mb2(∫ta+mb−t|(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))|d(g(s)))×(g(mb)−g(t)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(a))|+mg(t)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(b))|)d(g(t))≤∥h∥∞Mτ(g(mb)−g(a))[∫a+mb2a((g(mb)−g(t))τ−(g(t)−g(a))τ)(g(mb)−g(t))|f′(g(a))|d(g(t))+m∫a+mb2a((g(mb)−g(t))τ−(g(t)−g(a))τ)m(g(t)−g(a))|f′(g(b))|d(g(t))+∫mba+mb2((g(t)−g(a))τ−(g(mb)−g(t))τ)(g(mb)−g(t))|f′(g(a))|d(g(t))+m∫mba+mb2((g(t)−g(a))τ−(g(mb)−g(t))τ)m(g(t)−g(a))|f′(g(b))|d(g(t))]. | (3.9) |
After some calculations, we get
∫a+mb2a((g(mb)−g(t))τ−(g(t)−g(a))τ)(g(mb)−g(t))d(g(t))=∫mba+mb2((g(t)−g(a))τ−(g(mb)−g(t))τ)(g(t)−g(a))d(g(t))=(g(mb)−g(a))τ+2τ+2−(g(mb)−g(a+mb2))τ+2τ+2−(g(a+mb2)−g(a))τ+1τ+1(g(mb)−g(a+mb2))−(g(a+mb2)−g(a))τ+2(τ+1)(τ+2), |
and
∫a+mb2a((g(mb)−g(t))τ−(g(t)−g(a))τ)(g(t)−g(a))d(g(t))=∫mba+mb2((g(t)−g(a))τ−(g(mb)−g(t))τ)(g(mb)−g(t))d(g(t))=−(g(a+mb2)−g(a))τ+1τ+1(g(mb)−g(a+mb2))+(g(mb)−g(a))τ+2(τ+1)(τ+2)−(g(a+mb2)−g(a))τ+2(τ+1)(τ+2)−(g(mb)−g(a+mb2))τ+2τ+2. |
Using the above evaluations of integrals in (3.9), we get the required inequality (3.5).
Remark 4. ● In Theorem 3.3, if we put m=1, then we get [31,Theorem]
● In Theorem 3.3, if we put g=I and p=0, then we get [3,Theorem 2.3].
● In Theorem 3.3, if we put g=I, p=0 and m=1, then we get [19,Theorem 2.3].
● In Theorem 3.3, if we put g=I, then we get [4,Theorem].
● In Theorem 3.3, if we put g=I, m=1, then we get [16,Theorem 2.3].
● In Theorem 3.3, for ω=p=0, g=I and h=1 along with τ=m=1, then we get [9,Theorem 2.2].
● In Theorem 3.3, if we put ω=p=0, g=I and h=1 with m=1, then we get [28,Theorem 3].
Theorem 3.4. Let f,g,h:[a,mb]→R, 0<a<mb, Range (g), Range (h) ⊂[a,mb] be the functions such that f be positive, (f∘g)′∈L1[a,mb], g be a differentiable and strictly increasing and h be continuous. Also let h(g(t))=h(g(a)+g(mb)−g(t)) and |(f∘g)′|q1, q1≥1 is m-convex. Then for k<r+ℜ(σ), the following inequality for fractional integral operators (1.10) and (1.11) holds:
|(f(g(a))+f(g(mb))2)[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+h∘g)(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−h∘g)(a;p)]−[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+(f∘g)(h∘g))(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−(f∘g)(h∘g))(a;p)]|≤∥h∥∞M(g(mb)−g(a))τ+1τ(τ+1)((1−Ψ)1p1(1−Ω)1q1)(|f′(g(a))|q1+m|f′(g(b))|q12)1q1, | (3.10) |
where ∥h∥∞=supt∈[a,mb]|h(t)|, 1p1+1q1=1,
Ψ=(g(mb)−g(a+mb2)g(mb)−g(a))τ+1+(g(a+mb2)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a))τ+1 and
Ω=1τ+2[{(g(a+mb2)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a))τ+2}+{(g(mb)−g(a+mb2)g(mb)−g(a))τ+2}]
−τ+1τ+2[{(g(a+mb2)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a))τ+2}+{(g(mb)−g(a+mb2)g(mb)−g(a))τ+2}]
−(g(a+mb2)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a))τ+1(g(mb)−g(a+mb2)g(mb)−g(a))+(g(a+mb2)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a))(g(mb)−g(a+mb2)g(mb)−g(a))τ+1.
Proof. Using Lemma 3.2, power mean inequality, (3.8) and m-convexity of |(f∘g)′|q1 respectively, we have
|(f(g(a))+f(g(mb))2)[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+h∘g)(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−h∘g)(a;p)]−[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+(f∘g)(h∘g))(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−(f∘g)(h∘g))(a;p)]|≤[∫mba|∫a+mb−tt(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))|d(g(t))]1−1q1[∫mba|∫a+mb−tt(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1Eρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ(ω(g(mb)−g(s))σ;p)h(g(s))d(g(s))||f′(g(t))|q1]1q1. | (3.11) |
Since |(f∘g)′|q1 is m-convex on [a,b], we have
|f′(g(t))|q1≤g(mb)−g(t)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(a))|q1+mg(t)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(b))|q1. | (3.12) |
Using ∥h∥∞=supt∈[a,mb]|h(t)|, and absolute convergence of extended Mittag-Leffler function, inequality (3.11) becomes
|(f(g(a))+f(g(mb))2)[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+h∘g)(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−h∘g)(a;p)]−[(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,a+(f∘g)(h∘g))(mb;p)+(gΥρ,r,k,cσ,τ,δ,ω,mb−(f∘g)(h∘g))(a;p)]|≤∥h∥1−1q1∞M1−1q1[∫a+mb2a(∫a+mb−tt(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1d(g(s)))d(g(t))+∫ba+mb2(∫ta+mb−t(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1d(g(s)))d(g(t))]1−1q1×∥h∥1q1∞M1q1[∫a+mb2a(∫a+mb−tt(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1d(g(s)))×(g(mb)−g(t)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(a))|q1+mg(t)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(b))|q1)d(g(t))+∫ba+mb2(∫ta+mb−t(g(mb)−g(s))τ−1d(g(s)))×(g(mb)−g(t)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(a)))|q1+mg(t)−g(a)g(mb)−g(a)|f′(g(b))|q1)d(g(t))]1q1. |
After integrating and simplifying above inequality, we get (3.10).
Remark 5. ● In Theorem 3.4, if we put m=1, then we get [31,Theorem].
● In Theorem 3.4, if we put g=I and p=0, then we get [3,Theorem 2.6].
● In Theorem 3.4, if we put g=I, p=0 and m=1, then we get [19,Theorem 2.6].
● In Theorem 3.4, if we put g=I, then we get [4,Theorem].
● In Theorem 3.4, if we put g=I, m=1, then we get [16,Theorem 2.5].
This work provides the Hadamard and the Fejér-Hadamard inequalities for generalized extended fractional integral operators involving monotonically increasing function. These inequalities are obtained by using m-convex function which give results for convex function in particular. The presented results are generalizations of several fractional integral inequalities which are directly connected, consequently the well-known published results are quoted in remarks.
1. The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11971142, 11871202, 61673169, 11701176, 11626101, 11601485).
2. This work was sponsored in part by National key research and development projects of China (2017YFB1300502).
All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] |
Trumbo P, Schlicker S, Yates AA, et al. (2002) Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids. J Am Diet Assoc 102: 1621-1630. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90346-9 ![]() |
[2] | Wang TY, Liu M, Portincasa P, et al. (2013) New insights into the molecular mechanism of intestinal fatty acid absorption. Eur J Clin Invest 43: 1203-1223. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12161 |
[3] |
Mu H, Hoy CE (2004) The digestion of dietary triacylglycerols. Prog Lipid Res 43: 105-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-7827(03)00050-X ![]() |
[4] |
Iqbal J, Hussain MM (2009) Intestinal lipid absorption. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 296: E1183-1194. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.90899.2008 ![]() |
[5] | Hoyles L, Wallace RJ (2010) Gastrointestinal Tract: Fat Metabolism in the Colon. Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology. Berlin: Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77587-4_233 |
[6] |
Shortt C, Hasselwander O, Meynier A, et al. (2018) Systematic review of the effects of the intestinal microbiota on selected nutrients and non-nutrients. Eur J Nutr 57: 25-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-017-1546-4 ![]() |
[7] |
Agans R, Gordon A, Kramer DL, et al. (2018) Dietary Fatty Acids Sustain the Growth of the Human Gut Microbiota. Appl Environ Microbiol 84: e01525-01518. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01525-18 ![]() |
[8] |
Lindefeldt M, Eng A, Darban H, et al. (2019) The ketogenic diet influences taxonomic and functional composition of the gut microbiota in children with severe epilepsy. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 5: 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41522-018-0073-2 ![]() |
[9] |
Brinkworth GD, Noakes M, Clifton PM, et al. (2009) Comparative effects of very low-carbohydrate, high-fat and high-carbohydrate, low-fat weight-loss diets on bowel habit and faecal short-chain fatty acids and bacterial populations. Br J Nutr 101: 1493-1502. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114508094658 ![]() |
[10] |
Cani PD, Neyrinck AM, Fava F, et al. (2007) Selective increases of bifidobacteria in gut microflora improve high-fat-diet-induced diabetes in mice through a mechanism associated with endotoxaemia. Diabetologia 50: 2374-2383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-007-0791-0 ![]() |
[11] |
Gunasekera TS, Csonka LN, Paliy O (2008) Genome-wide transcriptional responses of Escherichia coli k-12 to continuous osmotic and heat stresses. J Bacteriol 190: 3712-3720. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01990-07 ![]() |
[12] |
Zheng CJ, Yoo JS, Lee TG, et al. (2005) Fatty acid synthesis is a target for antibacterial activity of unsaturated fatty acids. FEBS Lett 579: 5157-5162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2005.08.028 ![]() |
[13] |
Agans RT, Gordon A, Hussain S, et al. (2019) Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles Elicit Lower Direct Inhibitory Effect on Human Gut Microbiota Than Silver Nanoparticles. Toxicol Sci 172: 411-416. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfz183 ![]() |
[14] | Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the False Discovery Rate-a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc B Met 57: 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x |
[15] |
Senizza A, Rocchetti G, Callegari ML, et al. (2020) Linoleic acid induces metabolic stress in the intestinal microorganism Bifidobacterium breve DSM 20213. Sci Rep 10: 5997. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62897-w ![]() |
[16] | Yoon BK, Jackman JA, Valle-González ER, et al. (2018) Antibacterial Free Fatty Acids and Monoglycerides: Biological Activities, Experimental Testing, and Therapeutic Applications. Int J Mol Sci 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19041114 |
[17] |
Hovorková P, Laloučková K, Skřivanová E (2018) Determination of in vitro antibacterial activity of plant oils containing medium-chain fatty acids against Gram-positive pathogenic and gut commensal bacteria. Czech J Anim Sci 63: 119-125. https://doi.org/10.17221/70/2017-CJAS ![]() |
[18] |
Thormar H, Hilmarsson H, Bergsson G (2006) Stable concentrated emulsions of the 1-monoglyceride of capric acid (monocaprin) with microbicidal activities against the food-borne bacteria Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella spp., and Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 522-526. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.72.1.522-526.2006 ![]() |
[19] |
Li N, Yan F, Wang N, et al. (2020) Distinct Gut Microbiota and Metabolite Profiles Induced by Different Feeding Methods in Healthy Chinese Infants. Front Microbiol 11: 714. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00714 ![]() |
[20] |
Ruiz L, Margolles A, Sánchez B (2013) Bile resistance mechanisms in Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. Front Microbiol 4: 396. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00396 ![]() |
[21] |
Hildebrand P, Beglinger C, Gyr K, et al. (1990) Effects of a cholecystokinin receptor antagonist on intestinal phase of pancreatic and biliary responses in man. J Clin Invest 85: 640-646. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI114486 ![]() |
[22] |
Kim GB, Yi SH, Lee BH (2004) Purification and characterization of three different types of bile salt hydrolases from Bifidobacterium strains. J Dairy Sci 87: 258-266. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73164-1 ![]() |
[23] |
Sheu CW, Freese E (1973) Lipopolysaccharide layer protection of gram-negative bacteria against inhibition by long-chain fatty acids. J Bacteriol 115: 869-875. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.115.3.869-875.1973 ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1. | Muhammad Aamir Ali, Hüseyin Budak, Mujahid Abbas, Yu-Ming Chu, Quantum Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities for functions with convex absolute values of second qb-derivatives, 2021, 2021, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-03163-1 | |
2. | Muhammad Aamir Ali, Yu-Ming Chu, Hüseyin Budak, Abdullah Akkurt, Hüseyin Yıldırım, Manzoor Ahmed Zahid, Quantum variant of Montgomery identity and Ostrowski-type inequalities for the mappings of two variables, 2021, 2021, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-03195-7 | |
3. | Humaira Kalsoom, Muhammad Idrees, Artion Kashuri, Muhammad Uzair Awan, Yu-Ming Chu, Some New (p1p2,q1q2)-Estimates of Ostrowski-type integral inequalities via n-polynomials s-type convexity, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 7122, 10.3934/math.2020456 | |
4. | Artion Kashuri, Sajid Iqbal, Saad Ihsan Butt, Jamshed Nasir, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Thabet Abdeljawad, Basil K. Papadopoulos, Trapezium-Type Inequalities for k -Fractional Integral via New Exponential-Type Convexity and Their Applications, 2020, 2020, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2020/8672710 | |
5. | Thabet Abdeljawad, Saima Rashid, A. A. El-Deeb, Zakia Hammouch, Yu-Ming Chu, Certain new weighted estimates proposing generalized proportional fractional operator in another sense, 2020, 2020, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-02935-z | |
6. | Thabet Abdeljawad, Saima Rashid, Zakia Hammouch, İmdat İşcan, Yu-Ming Chu, Some new Simpson-type inequalities for generalized p-convex function on fractal sets with applications, 2020, 2020, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-02955-9 | |
7. | Tie-Hong Zhao, Zai-Yin He, Yu-Ming Chu, On some refinements for inequalities involving zero-balanced hypergeometric function, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 6479, 10.3934/math.2020418 | |
8. | Xiaoli Qiang, Abid Mahboob, Yu-Ming Chu, Jiabin Zuo, Numerical Approximation of Fractional-Order Volterra Integrodifferential Equation, 2020, 2020, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2020/8875792 | |
9. | Imran Abbas Baloch, Aqeel Ahmad Mughal, Yu-Ming Chu, Absar Ul Haq, Manuel De La Sen, A variant of Jensen-type inequality and related results for harmonic convex functions, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 6404, 10.3934/math.2020412 | |
10. | Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Yu-Ming Chu, Nazia Jahangir, Huma Akhtar, Chahn Yong Jung, On Generalized Strongly p-Convex Functions of Higher Order, 2020, 2020, 2314-4629, 1, 10.1155/2020/8381431 | |
11. | Shuang-Shuang Zhou, Saima Rashid, Muhammad Aslam Noor, Khalida Inayat Noor, Farhat Safdar, Yu-Ming Chu, New Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for exponentially convex functions and applications, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 6874, 10.3934/math.2020441 | |
12. | Muhammad Uzair Awan, Sadia Talib, Artion Kashuri, Muhammad Aslam Noor, Khalida Inayat Noor, Yu-Ming Chu, A new q-integral identity and estimation of its bounds involving generalized exponentially μ-preinvex functions, 2020, 2020, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-03036-7 | |
13. | Xiaobin Wang, Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Kiran Naseem Aslam, Xingxing Wu, Tong Zhou, Sunil Kumar, On Caputo–Fabrizio Fractional Integral Inequalities of Hermite–Hadamard Type for Modified h -Convex Functions, 2020, 2020, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2020/8829140 | |
14. | Jian Wang, Ayesha Jamal, Xuemei Li, Kamal Shah, Numerical Solution of Fractional-Order Fredholm Integrodifferential Equation in the Sense of Atangana–Baleanu Derivative, 2021, 2021, 1563-5147, 1, 10.1155/2021/6662808 | |
15. | Saad Ihsan Butt, Muhammad Umar, Saima Rashid, Ahmet Ocak Akdemir, Yu-Ming Chu, New Hermite–Jensen–Mercer-type inequalities via k-fractional integrals, 2020, 2020, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-020-03093-y | |
16. | Shu-Bo Chen, Saima Rashid, Muhammad Aslam Noor, Rehana Ashraf, Yu-Ming Chu, A new approach on fractional calculus and probability density function, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 7041, 10.3934/math.2020451 | |
17. | Xi-Fan Huang, Miao-Kun Wang, Hao Shao, Yi-Fan Zhao, Yu-Ming Chu, Monotonicity properties and bounds for the complete p-elliptic integrals, 2020, 5, 2473-6988, 7071, 10.3934/math.2020453 | |
18. | Lei Chen, Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Muhammad Sajid Zahoor, Rahat Bano, Xiaolong Qin, Some Inequalities Related to Interval-Valued η h -Convex Functions, 2021, 2021, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2021/6617074 | |
19. | Qi Li, Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Peiyu Yan, Muhammad Sajid Zahoor, Muhammad Imran, Ahmet Ocak Akdemir, On Strongly Convex Functions via Caputo–Fabrizio-Type Fractional Integral and Some Applications, 2021, 2021, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2021/6625597 | |
20. | Lanxin Chen, Junxian Zhang, Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Imran Ahmed, Shumaila Waheed, Lishuang Pan, Fractional integral inequalities for h-convex functions via Caputo-Fabrizio operator, 2021, 6, 2473-6988, 6377, 10.3934/math.2021374 | |
21. | Haoliang Fu, Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Waqas Nazeer, Mamoona Ghafoor, Peigen Li, On Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for n-polynomial convex stochastic processes, 2021, 6, 2473-6988, 6322, 10.3934/math.2021371 | |
22. | Slavko Simić, Bandar Bin-Mohsin, Some generalizations of the Hermite–Hadamard integral inequality, 2021, 2021, 1029-242X, 10.1186/s13660-021-02605-y | |
23. | Wengui Yang, Certain New Chebyshev and Grüss-Type Inequalities for Unified Fractional Integral Operators via an Extended Generalized Mittag-Leffler Function, 2022, 6, 2504-3110, 182, 10.3390/fractalfract6040182 | |
24. | Muhammad Imran Asjad, Waqas Ali Faridi, Mohammed M. Al-Shomrani, Abdullahi Yusuf, The generalization of Hermite-Hadamard type Inequality with exp-convexity involving non-singular fractional operator, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 7040, 10.3934/math.2022392 | |
25. | Miguel Vivas-Cortez, Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Sana Sajid, Muhammad Sajid Zahoor, Artion Kashuri, Hermite–Jensen–Mercer-Type Inequalities via Caputo–Fabrizio Fractional Integral for h-Convex Function, 2021, 5, 2504-3110, 269, 10.3390/fractalfract5040269 | |
26. | Yan Zhao, M. Shoaib Saleem, Shahid Mehmood, Zabidin Salleh, Sibel Yalçın, On Extended Convex Functions via Incomplete Gamma Functions, 2021, 2021, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2021/1924242 | |
27. | Chahn Yong Jung, Ghulam Farid, Hafsa Yasmeen, Yu-Pei Lv, Josip Pečarić, Refinements of some fractional integral inequalities for refined (α,h−m)-convex function, 2021, 2021, 1687-1847, 10.1186/s13662-021-03544-0 | |
28. | WENGUI YANG, CERTAIN NEW WEIGHTED YOUNG- AND PÓLYA–SZEGÖ-TYPE INEQUALITIES FOR UNIFIED FRACTIONAL INTEGRAL OPERATORS VIA AN EXTENDED GENERALIZED MITTAG-LEFFLER FUNCTION WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 30, 0218-348X, 10.1142/S0218348X22501067 | |
29. | Kamsing Nonlaopon, Ghulam Farid, Ammara Nosheen, Muhammad Yussouf, Ebenezer Bonyah, Mawardi Bahri, New Generalized Riemann–Liouville Fractional Integral Versions of Hadamard and Fejér–Hadamard Inequalities, 2022, 2022, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2022/8173785 | |
30. | Ghulam Farid, Muhammad Yussouf, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Fejér–Hadamard Type Inequalities for (α, h-m)-p-Convex Functions via Extended Generalized Fractional Integrals, 2021, 5, 2504-3110, 253, 10.3390/fractalfract5040253 | |
31. | Wenyan Jia, Muhammad Yussouf, Ghulam Farid, Khuram Ali Khan, Rafael Morales, Hadamard and Fejér–Hadamard Inequalities for α , h − m − p -Convex Functions via Riemann–Liouville Fractional Integrals, 2021, 2021, 1563-5147, 1, 10.1155/2021/9945114 | |
32. | Aqeel Ahmad Mughal, Deeba Afzal, Thabet Abdeljawad, Aiman Mukheimer, Imran Abbas Baloch, Refined estimates and generalization of some recent results with applications, 2021, 6, 2473-6988, 10728, 10.3934/math.2021623 | |
33. | Waewta Luangboon, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Jessada Tariboon, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, Simpson- and Newton-Type Inequalities for Convex Functions via (p,q)-Calculus, 2021, 9, 2227-7390, 1338, 10.3390/math9121338 | |
34. | Xue Wang, Absar ul Haq, Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Sami Ullah Zakir, Mohsan Raza, The Strong Convex Functions and Related Inequalities, 2022, 2022, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2022/4056201 | |
35. | Muhammad Samraiz, Maria Malik, Kanwal Saeed, Saima Naheed, Sina Etemad, Manuel De la Sen, Shahram Rezapour, A Study on the Modified Form of Riemann-Type Fractional Inequalities via Convex Functions and Related Applications, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 2682, 10.3390/sym14122682 | |
36. | Muzammil Mukhtar, Muhammad Yaqoob, Muhammad Samraiz, Iram Shabbir, Sina Etemad, Manuel De la Sen, Shahram Rezapour, Novel Mean-Type Inequalities via Generalized Riemann-Type Fractional Integral for Composite Convex Functions: Some Special Examples, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 479, 10.3390/sym15020479 | |
37. | Miguel Vivas-Cortez, Muzammil Mukhtar, Iram Shabbir, Muhammad Samraiz, Muhammad Yaqoob, On Fractional Integral Inequalities of Riemann Type for Composite Convex Functions and Applications, 2023, 7, 2504-3110, 345, 10.3390/fractalfract7050345 | |
38. | Shahid Mubeen, Rana Safdar Ali, Yasser Elmasry, Ebenezer Bonyah, Artion Kashuri, Gauhar Rahman, Çetin Yildiz, A. Hussain, On Novel Fractional Integral and Differential Operators and Their Properties, 2023, 2023, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2023/4165363 | |
39. | Iqra Nayab, Shahid Mubeen, Rana Safdar Ali, Faisal Zahoor, Muath Awadalla, Abd Elmotaleb A. M. A. Elamin, Novel fractional inequalities measured by Prabhakar fuzzy fractional operators pertaining to fuzzy convexities and preinvexities, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 17696, 10.3934/math.2024860 | |
40. | HUMAIRA KALSOOM, ZAREEN A. KHAN, NEW INEQUALITIES OF HERMITE–HADAMARD TYPE FOR n-POLYNOMIAL s-TYPE CONVEX STOCHASTIC PROCESSES, 2023, 31, 0218-348X, 10.1142/S0218348X23401953 | |
41. | Wali Haider, Abdul Mateen, Hüseyin Budak, Asia Shehzadi, Loredana Ciurdariu, Novel Fractional Boole’s-Type Integral Inequalities via Caputo Fractional Operator and Their Implications in Numerical Analysis, 2025, 13, 2227-7390, 551, 10.3390/math13040551 | |
42. | Moquddsa Zahra, Muhammad Ashraf, Ghulam Farid, Nawab Hussain, Fractional Hadamard-type inequalities for refined (α, h-m)-p-convex functions and their consequences, 2024, 38, 0354-5180, 5463, 10.2298/FIL2415463Z |