Citation: Alaa Fathalla, Amal Abd el-mageed. Salt tolerance enhancement Of wheat (Triticum Asativium L) genotypes by selected plant growth promoting bacteria[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(3): 250-271. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020016
[1] | Tariq A. Aljaaidi, Deepak B. Pachpatte . Some Grüss-type inequalities using generalized Katugampola fractional integral. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1011-1024. doi: 10.3934/math.2020070 |
[2] | Mustafa Gürbüz, Yakup Taşdan, Erhan Set . Ostrowski type inequalities via the Katugampola fractional integrals. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 42-53. doi: 10.3934/math.2020004 |
[3] | Miguel Vivas-Cortez, Muhammad Aamir Ali, Artion Kashuri, Hüseyin Budak . Generalizations of fractional Hermite-Hadamard-Mercer like inequalities for convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9397-9421. doi: 10.3934/math.2021546 |
[4] | Ghulam Farid, Hafsa Yasmeen, Hijaz Ahmad, Chahn Yong Jung . Riemann-Liouville Fractional integral operators with respect to increasing functions and strongly (α,m)-convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 11403-11424. doi: 10.3934/math.2021661 |
[5] | Saad Ihsan Butt, Artion Kashuri, Muhammad Umar, Adnan Aslam, Wei Gao . Hermite-Jensen-Mercer type inequalities via Ψ-Riemann-Liouville k-fractional integrals. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 5193-5220. doi: 10.3934/math.2020334 |
[6] | Hüseyin Budak, Fatma Ertuğral, Muhammad Aamir Ali, Candan Can Bilişik, Mehmet Zeki Sarikaya, Kamsing Nonlaopon . On generalizations of trapezoid and Bullen type inequalities based on generalized fractional integrals. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1833-1847. doi: 10.3934/math.2023094 |
[7] | Yanping Yang, Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Waqas Nazeer, Ahsan Fareed Shah . New Hermite-Hadamard inequalities in fuzzy-interval fractional calculus via exponentially convex fuzzy interval-valued function. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 12260-12278. doi: 10.3934/math.2021710 |
[8] | Eze R. Nwaeze, Muhammad Adil Khan, Ali Ahmadian, Mohammad Nazir Ahmad, Ahmad Kamil Mahmood . Fractional inequalities of the Hermite–Hadamard type for m-polynomial convex and harmonically convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1889-1904. doi: 10.3934/math.2021115 |
[9] | Atiq Ur Rehman, Ghulam Farid, Sidra Bibi, Chahn Yong Jung, Shin Min Kang . k-fractional integral inequalities of Hadamard type for exponentially (s,m)-convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 882-892. doi: 10.3934/math.2021052 |
[10] | Thanin Sitthiwirattham, Muhammad Aamir Ali, Hüseyin Budak, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, Chanon Promsakon . Fractional Ostrowski type inequalities for differentiable harmonically convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 3939-3958. doi: 10.3934/math.2022217 |
Fractional calculus is like an extended version of regular calculus that allows us to deal with numbers that are not whole, like 1.5 or 2.3. This might not sound like a big deal, but it is incredibly useful in many fields. When we want to understand how things change or accumulate over time, fractional calculus helps us do that more accurately, especially when things are complicated and do not follow normal rules. These fractional calculations come in handy when we are dealing with stuff like how liquids flow, how materials deform, or how we control things like robots or machines. Inequalities, in the context of fractional calculus, are like special rules that help us understand when things are bigger or smaller than each other, but with these non-whole numbers involved. These rules are important because they help us figure out if systems with fractional calculus are stable and work the way they should. Thus, in a nutshell, fractional calculus and inequalities help us make sense of the world in a more precise and practical way. Thus, the term convexity and inequalities in the frame of fractional calculus have been recommended as an engrossing area for researchers due to their vital role and fruitful importance in numerous branches of science. Integral inequalities have remarkable uses in probability, optimization theory, information technology, stochastic processes, statistics, integral operator theory and numerical integration. For the applications, see references [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8].
In [9], a comprehensive and up-to-date review on Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for different kinds of convexities and different kinds of fractional integral operators is presented. In this review paper, we aim to discuss and present the up-to-date review of the Grüss type inequality via different fractional integral operators.
In [10] (see also [11]), the Grüss inequality is defined as the integral inequality that establishes a connection between the integral of the product of two functions and the product of the integrals. The inequality is as follows.
Theorem 1.1. If Ω,Π:[x1,x2]→R are two continuous functions satisfying m≤Ω(t)≤M and p≤Π(t)≤P, t∈[x1,x2], m,M,p,P∈R, then
|1x2−x1∫x2x1Ω(s)Π(s)ds−1(x2−x1)2∫x2x1Ω(s)ds∫x2x1Π(s)ds|≤14(M−m)(P−p). |
Our objective in this paper is to present a comprehensive and up-to-date review on Grüss-type inequalities for different kinds of fractional integral operators. In each section and subsection, we first introduce the basic definitions of fractional integral operators and then include the results on Grüss-type inequalities. We believe that the collection of almost all existing in the literature Grüss-type inequalities in one file will help new researchers in the field learn about the available work on the topic before developing new results. We present the results without proof but instead provide a complete reference for the details of each result elaborated in this survey for the convenience of the reader.
The remainder of this review paper is as follows. In Sections 2–15, we summarize Grüss-type integral inequalities and especially for Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operators in Section 2, for Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals of a function with respect to another function in Section 3, in Section 4 for Katugampola fractional integral operators, in Section 5 for Hadamard's fractional integral operators, in Section 6 for k-fractional integral operators, in Section 7 for Raina's fractional integral operators, in Section 8 for tempered fractional integral operators, in Section 9 for conformable fractional integrals operators, in Section 10 for proportional fractional integrals operators, in Section 11 for generalized Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operators, in Section 12 for Caputo-Fabrizio fractional integrals operators, for Saigo fractional integral operators in Section 13, in Section 14 for quantum integral operators and in Section 15 for Hilfer fractional differential operators.
Throughout this survey the following assumptions are used:
(H) Assume that Ω,Π:I→R are integrable functions on I for which there exist constants m,M,p,P∈R, such that
m≤Ω(t)≤M,p≤Π(t)≤P,t∈I. |
(H1) There exist two integrable functions Q1,Q2:[0,∞)→R such that
Q1(t)≤Ω(t)≤Q2(t)for allt∈[0,∞). |
(H2) There exist two integrable functions R1,R2:[0,∞)→R such that
R1(t)≤Π(t)≤R2(t)for allt∈[0,∞). |
In this subsection we give generalizations for Grüss-type inequalities by using the Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals. The first result deals with some inequalities using one fractional parameter.
Definition 2.1. [12] A real valued function Ω(t),t≥0 is said to be in
(ⅰ) the space Cμ,μ∈R if there exists a real number p>μ such that Ω(t)=tpΩ1(t), where Ω1(t)∈C([0,∞),R),
(ⅰ) the space Cnμ,μ∈R if Ω(n)∈Cμ.
Definition 2.2. [12] The Riemann-Liouville integral operator of fractional order α≥0, for an integrable function Ω is defined by
JαΩ(t)=1Γ(α)∫t0(t−s)α−1Ω(s)ds,α>0,t>0, |
and J0Ω(t)=Ω(t).
Theorem 2.1. [12] Assume that (H) holds on [0,∞). Then for all t>0 and α>0 we have:
|tαΓ(α+1)JαΩ(t)Π(t)−JαΩ(t)JαΠ(t)|≤(tα2Γ(α+1))2(M−m)(P−p). |
In the next result two real positive parameters are used.
Theorem 2.2. [12] Assume that (H) holds on [0,∞). Then for all t>0 and α>0,β>0 we have:
(tαΓ(α+1)JβΩ(t)Π(t)+tβΓ(β+1)JαΩ(t)Π(t)−JαΩ(t)JβΠ(t)−JβΩ(t)JαΠ(t))2≤[(MtαΓ(α+1)−JαΩ(t))(JβΩ(t)−mtβΓ(β+1))+(JαΩ(t)−mtαΓ(α+1))(MtβΓ(β+1)−JβΩ(t))]×[(PtαΓ(α+1)−JαΠ(t))(JβΠ(t)−ptβΓ(β+1))+(JαΠ(t)−ptαΓ(α+1))(PtβΓ(β+1)−JβΠ(t))]. |
Next, we present some fractional integral inequalities of Grüss type by using the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral. The constants appeared as bounds of the functions Ω and Π, are replaced by four integrable functions.
Theorem 2.3. [13] Assume that Ω:[0,∞)→R is an integrable function satisfying (H1). Then, for t>0, α,β>0, we have:
JβQ1(t)JαΩ(t)+JαQ2(t)JβΩ(t)≥JαQ2(t)JβQ1(t)+JαΩ(t)JβΩ(t). |
Theorem 2.4. [13] Suppose that Ω,Π:[0,∞)→R are two integrable functions satisfying (H1) and (H2). Then, for t>0, α, β>0, the fractional integral inequalities hold:
(i)JβR1(t)JαΩ(t)+JαQ2(t)JβΠ(t)≥JβR1(t)JαQ2(t)+JαΩ(t)JβΠ(t).(ii)JβQ1(t)JαΠ(t)+JαR2(t)JβΩ(t)≥JβQ1(t)JαR2(t)+JβΩ(t)JαΠ(t).(iii)JαQ2(t)JβR2(t)+JαΩ(t)JβΠ(t)≥JαQ2(t)JβΠ(t)+JβR2(t)JαΩ(t).(iv)JαQ1(t)JβR1(t)+JαΩ(t)JβΠ(t)≥JαQ1(t)JβΠ(t)+JβR1(t)JαΩ(t). |
Theorem 2.5. [13] Assume that Ω,Π:[0,∞)→R are two integrable functions satisfying (H1) and (H2). Then for all t>0, α>0, we have:
|tαΓ(α+1)JαΩ(t)Π(t)−JαΩ(t)JαΠ(t)|≤√T(Ω,Q1,Q2)T(Π,R1,R2), |
where T(y,z,w) is defined by
T(y,z,w)=(Jαw(t)−Jαy(t))(Jαy(t)−Jαz(t))+tαΓ(α+1)Jαz(t)y(t)−Jαz(t)Jαy(t)+tαΓ(α+1)Jαw(t)y(t)−Jαw(t)Jαy(t)+Jαz(t)Jαw(t)−tαΓ(α+1)Jαz(t)w(t). |
In the next theorem we give an Ostrowski-Grüss type inequality of fractional type via Riemann-Liouville fractional integral.
Theorem 2.6. [14] Let Ω:[x1,x2]→R be a differentiable mapping on (x1,x2) and |Ω′(x)|≤M for all x∈[x1,x2]. Then
|12Ω(x)−(α+1)Γ(α)(x2−x)1−α2(x2−x1)Jαx1Ω(x2)+12Jα−1x1((x2−x)1−αΓ(α)Ω(x2))+(x2−x)2−α2(x2−x1)Γ(α)Jα−1x1Ω(x2)+(x2−x)1−α(x−x1)2(x2−x1)2−αΩ(x1)|≤M(x2−x)1−αx2−x1[(x2−x1)α(x−x1)+(x2−x)α(x1+x2−2x)2α], |
where x1≤x<x2.
Definition 3.1. [15] Let ψ:[0,∞)→R be positive, increasing function and also its derivative ψ′ be continuous on [0,∞) and ψ(0)=0. The fractional integral of Riemann-Liouville type of an integrable function Ω with respect to another function ψ is defined as
Iα,ψΩ(t)=1Γ(α)∫t0(ψ(t)−ψ(s))α−1ψ′(s)Ω(s)ds. |
In the next we include Grüss type integral inequalities with the help of ψ-Riemann-Liouville fractional integral.
Theorem 3.1. [16] Assume that ψ:[0,∞)→R is a positive, increasing function and also its derivative ψ′ is continuous on [0,∞) and ψ(0)=0. Assume that Ω:[0,∞)→R is an integrable function satisfying (H1). Then the following inequality holds:
Iβ,ψQ1(t)Iα,ψΩ(t)+Iα,ψQ2(t)Iβ,ψΩ(t)≥Iα,ψQ2(t)Iβ,ψQ1(t)+Iβ,ψΩ(t)Iβ,ψΩ(t). |
Theorem 3.2. [16] Let ψ be as in Theorem 3.1 and Ω,Π be two integrable functions satisfying (H1) and (H2). Then we have:
(a) Iβ,ψR1(t)Iα,ψΩ(t)+Iα,ψQ2(t)Iβ,ψΠ(t)≥Iβ,ψR1(t)Iα,ψQ2(t)+Iα,ψΩ(t)Iβ,ψΠ(t).
(b) Iβ,ψQ1(t)Iα,ψΠ(t)+Iα,ψR2(t)Iβ,ψΩ(t)≥Iβ,ψQ1(t)Iα,ψR2(t)+Iβ,ψΩ(t)Iα,ψΠ(t).
(c) Iα,ψQ2(t)Iβ,ψR2(t)+Iα,ψΩ(t)Iβ,ψΠ(t)≥Iα,ψQ2(t)Iβ,ψΠ(t)+Iβ,ψR2(t)Iα,ψΩ(t).
(d) Iα,ψQ1(t)Iβ,ψR1(t)+Iα,ψΩ(t)Iβ,ψΠ(t)≥Iα,ψQ1(t)Iβ,ψΠ(t)+Iβ,ψR1(t)Iα,ψΩ(t).
Theorem 3.3. [16] Let ψ be as in Theorem 3.1 and Ω,Π be two integrable functions satisfying (H1) and (H2). Then the following inequality holds:
|ψα(t)Γ(α+1)Iα,ψΩ(t)Π(t)−Iα,ψΩ(t)Iα,ψΠ(t)|≤√T(Ω,Q1,Q2)T(Π,R1,R2), |
where
T(y,z,w)=(Iα,ψw(t)−Iα,ψy(t))(Iα,ψy(t)−Iα,ψz(t))+ψα(t)Γ(α+1)Iα,ψv(t)Iα,ψy(t)−Iα,ψz(t)Iα,ψy(t)+ψα(t)Γ(α+1)Iα,ψw(t)y(t)−Iα,ψw(t)Iα,ψy(t)+Iα,ψz(t)Iα,ψw(t)−ψα(t)Γ(α+1)Iα,ψz(t)w(t). |
Now we define the space Xpc(x1,x2) in which Katugampola's fractional integrals are defined.
Definition 4.1. [17] The space Xpc(x1,x2)(c∈R,1≤p<∞) consists of those complex-valued Lebesgue measurable functions ϕ on (x1,x2) for which ‖ϕ‖Xpc<∞, with
‖ϕ‖Xpc=(∫x2x1|xcϕ(x)|pdxx)1/p(1≤p<∞), |
and
‖ϕ‖X∞c=esssupx∈(x1,x2)[xc|ϕ(x)|]. |
Definition 4.2. [17] Let ϕ∈Xpc(x1,x2), α>0 and β,ρ,η,κ∈R. Then, the left- and right- sided fractional integrals of a function ϕ are defined respectively by
ρJα,βx1+,η,κϕ(x)=ρ1−βxκΓ(α)∫xx1τρ(η+1)−1(xρ−τρ)1−αϕ(τ)dτ,0≤x1<x<x2≤∞, |
and
ρJα,βx2−,η,κϕ(x)=ρ1−βxρηΓ(α)∫x2xτκ+ρ−1(τρ−xρ)1−αϕ(τ)dτ,0≤x1<x<x2≤∞, |
if the integrals exist.
Now, we present several Grüss-type inequalities involving Katugampola's fractional integral.
Theorem 4.1. [17] Assume that (H) holds on [0,∞). Then we have:
|Λρ,βx,κ(α,η)ρJα,βη,κΩ(x)Π(x)−ρJα,βη,κΩ(x)ρJα,βη,κΠ(x)|≤(Λρ,βx,κ(α,η))2(M−m)(P−p), |
for all β,κ∈R, x>0, α>0, ρ>0 and η≥0, where
Λρ,βx,κ(α,η)=Γ(η+1)Γ(η+α+1)ρ−βxκ+ρ(η+α). |
Theorem 4.2. [17] Assume that (H) holds on [0,∞). Then for all β,κ∈R, x>0, α>0, γ>0 and η≥0, we have:
(Λρ,βx,κ(α,η)ρJγ,βη,κΩ(x)Π(x)+Λρ,βx,κ(γ,η)ρJα,βη,κΩ(x)Π(x)−ρJα,βη,κΩ(x)ρJα,βη,κΠ(x)−ρJγ,βη,κΩ(x)ρJα,βη,κΠ(x))2≤[(MΛρ,βx,κ(α,η)−ρJα,βη,κΩ(x))(ρJγ,βη,κΩ(x)−mΛρ,βx,κ(α,η))+(ρJα,βη,κΩ(x)−mΛρ,βx,κ(α,η))(MΛρ,βx,κ(γ,η)−ρJγ,βη,κΩ(x))]×[(PΛρ,βx,κ(α,η)−ρJα,βη,κΠ(x))(ρJγ,βη,κΠ(x)−pΛρ,βx,κ(γ,η))+(ρJα,βη,κΠ(x)−pΛρ,βx,κ(α,η))(PΛρ,βx,κ(γ,η)−ρJγ,βη,κΠ(x))]. |
Theorem 4.3. [17] Let α>0, β,ρ,η,κ∈R, Ω,Π∈Xpc(0,x) x>0 and p,q>1 such that 1p+1q=1. Then we have:
(a)1pρJα,βη,κΩp(x)+1qρJα,βη,κΠq(x)≥Γ(η+α+1)ρβΓ(η+1)xρ(η+α)+κ(ρJα,βη,κΩ(x)ρJα,βη,κΠ(x)).(b)1pρJα,βη,κΩp(x)ρJα,βη,κΠp(x)+1qρJα,βη,κΩq(x)ρJα,βη,κΠq(x)≥(ρJα,βη,κΩ(x)Π(x))2.(c)1pρJα,βη,κΩp(x)ρJα,βη,κΠq(x)+1qρJα,βη,κΩq(x)ρJα,βη,κΠp(x)≥(ρJα,βη,κ(ΩΠ)p−1(x))(ρJα,βη,κ(ΩΠ)q−1(x)).(d)ρJα,βη,κΩp(x)ρJα,βη,κΠq(x)≥(ρJα,βη,κΩ(x)Π(x))(ρJα,βη,κΩp−1(x)Πq−1(x)).(e)1pρJα,βη,κΩp(x)ρJα,βη,κΠ2(x)+1qρJα,βη,κΩ2(x)ρJα,βη,κΠq(x)≥(ρJα,βη,κΩ(x)Π(x))(ρJα,βη,κΩ2/p(x)Π2/p(x)).(f)1pρJα,βη,κΩ2(x)ρJα,βη,κΠq(x)+1qρJα,βη,κΩq(x)ρJα,βη,κΠ2(x)≥(ρJα,βη,κΩ2/p(x)Π2/p(x))(ρJα,βη,κΩp−1(x)Πq−1(x)).(g)ρJα,βη,κΩ2(x)ρJα,βη,κ(Πq(x)p+Πq(x)q)≥(ρJα,βη,κΩ2/p(x)Π(x))(ρJα,βη,κΩ2/q(x)Π(x)). |
Theorem 4.4. [17]\ Assume that the assumptions of Theorem 4.3 are satisfied. In addition, let
μ=min0≤t≤xΩ(t)Π(t)andM=max0≤t≤xΩ(t)Π(t). |
Then we have:
(i)0≤(ρJα,βη,κΩ2(x)ρJα,βη,κΠ2(x))≤(M+μ)24μM(ρJα,βη,κΩ(x)Π(x))2.(ii)0≤√ρJα,βη,κΩ2(x)ρJα,βη,κΠ2(x)−(ρJα,βη,κΩ(x)Π(x))≤(√M−√μ)22√μM(ρJα,βη,κΩ(x)Π(x)).(iii)0≤ρJα,βη,κΩ2(x)ρJα,βη,κΠ2(x)−(ρJα,βη,κΩ(x)Π(x))2≤(M−μ)24μM(ρJα,βη,κΩ(x)Π(x))2. |
Theorem 4.5. [18] Assume that Ω:[0,∞)→R is an integrable function satisfying (H1). Then we have:
ρJα,βη,kQ2(t)ρJδ,λη,kΩ(t)+ρJα,βη,kΩ(t)ρJδ,λη,kQ1(t)≥ρJα,βη,kΩ(t)ρJδ,λη,kΩ(t)+ρJα,βη,kQ2(t)ρJδ,λη,kQ1(t), |
for all t>0,α,ρ,δ>0, β,η,k,λ∈R.
Theorem 4.6. [18] Suppose that Ω,Π:[0,∞)→R are two integrable functions satisfying (H1) and (H2). Then for all t>0 and α,ρ>0, β,η,k∈R we have:
[Λρ,βt,k(α,η)ρJα,βη,kΩ(t)Π(t)−(ρJα,βη,kΩ(t)ρJα,βη,kΠ(t))]2≤T(Ω,Q1,Q2)T(Π,R1,R2), |
where
T(y,z,w)=(ρJα,βη,kw(t)−ρJα,βη,ky(t))(ρJα,βη,ky(t)−ρJα,βη,kz(t))+Λρ,βt,k(α,η)ρJα,βη,ky(t)z(t)−ρJα,βη,ky(t)ρJα,βη,kz(t)+Λρ,βt,k(α,η)ρJα,βη,ky(t)w(t)−ρJα,βη,ky(t)ρJα,βη,kw(t)−Λρ,βt,k(α,η)ρJα,βη,kz(t)w(t)+ρJα,βη,kz(t)ρJα,βη,kw(t). |
Theorem 4.7. [18] Suppose that Ω,Π:[0,∞)→R are two integrable functions satisfying (H1) and (H2). Then for all t>0 and α,δ,ρ>0, β,λ,η,k∈R we have:
(a) ρJδ,λη,kΩ(t)ρJα,βη,kQ2(t)+ρJδ,λη,kR1(t)ρJα,βη,kΠ(t)≥ρJδ,λη,kR1(t)ρJα,βη,kQ2(t)+ρJδ,λη,kΩ(t)ρJα,βη,kΠ(t).
(b) ρJδ,λη,kQ1(t)ρJα,βη,kΩ(t)+ρJα,βη,kR2(t)ρJδ,λη,kΠ(t)≥ρJδ,λη,kQ1(t)ρJα,βη,kR2(t)+ρJδ,λη,kΠ(t)ρJα,βη,kΩ(t).
(c) ρJα,βη,kQ2(t)ρJδ,λη,kR2(t)+ρJα,βη,kΠ(t)ρJδ,λη,kΩ(t)≥ρJα,βη,kQ2(t)ρJδ,λη,kΩ(t)+ρJδ,λη,kR2(t)ρJα,βη,kΠ(t).
(d) ρJα,βη,kQ1(t)ρJδ,λη,kR1(t)+ρJα,βη,kΠ(t)ρJδ,λη,kΩ(t)≥ρJα,βη,kQ1(t)ρJδ,λη,kΩ(t)+ρJδ,λη,kR1(t)ρJα,βη,kΠ(t).
Definition 5.1. [15] The fractional integral of Hadamard type of order α∈R+ of an integrable function Ω(t), for all t>1 is defined as
HJαΩ(t)=1Γ(α)∫t1(logts)α−1Ω(s)dss, | (5.1) |
provided the integral exists. (Here log(⋅)=loge(⋅)).
We present, by using Hadamard's fractional integral, some Grüss-type fractional integral inequalities.
Theorem 5.1. [19] Assume that Ω:[1,∞)→R is an integrable function satisfying (H1). Then, for t>1, α,β>0, we have
HJβQ1(t)HJαΩ(t)+HJαQ2(t)HJβΩ(t)≥HJαQ2(t)HJβQ1(t)+HJαΩ(t)HJβΩ(t). |
Theorem 5.2. [19] Assume that Ω:[1,∞)→R is an integrable function satisfying (H1). Let θ1,θ2>0 satisfying 1/θ1+1/θ2=1. Then, for t>1, α,β>0, we have
1θ1(logt)βΓ(β+1)HJα((Q2−Ω)θ1)(t)+1θ2(logt)αΓ(α+1)HJβ((Ω−Q1)θ2)(t)+HJαQ2(t)HJβQ1(t)+HJαΩ(t)HJβΩ(t)≥HJαQ2(t)HJβΩ(t)+HJαΩ(t)HJβQ1(t). |
Theorem 5.3. [19] Assume that Ω:[1,∞)→R is an integrable function satisfying (H1). Let θ1,θ2>0 satisfying θ1+θ2=1. Then, for t>1, α,β>0, we have
θ1(logt)βΓ(β+1)HJαQ2(t)+θ2(logt)αΓ(α+1)HJβΩ(t)≥HJα(Q2−Ω)θ1(t)HJβ(Ω−Q1)θ2(t)+θ1(logt)βΓ(β+1)HJαΩ(t)+θ2(logt)αΓ(α+1)HJβQ1(t). |
Theorem 5.4. [19] Assume that Ω:[1,∞)→R is an integrable function satisfying (H1). Let p≥q≥0, p≠0. Then, we have the following two inequalities, for any k>0, t>1, α, β>0,
(i)HJα(Q2−Ω)qp(t)+qpkq−ppHJαΩ(t)≤qpkq−ppHJαQ2(t)+p−qpkqp(logt)αΓ(α+1).(ii)HJα(Ω−Q1)qp(t)+qpkq−ppHJαQ1(t)≤qpkq−ppHJαΩ(t)+p−qpkqp(logt)αΓ(α+1). |
Theorem 5.5. [19] Suppose that Ω,Π:[1,∞)→R are two integrable functions satisfying (H1) and (H2). Then, for t>0, α, β>0, we have:
(a) HJβR1(t)HJαΩ(t)+HJαQ2(t)HJβΠ(t)≥HJβR1(t)HJαQ2(t)+HJαΩ(t)HJβΠ(t).
(b) HJβQ1(t)HJαΠ(t)+HJαR2(t)HJβΩ(t)≥HJβQ1(t)HJαR2(t)+HJβΩ(t)HJαΠ(t).
(c) HJβR2(t)HJαQ2(t)+HJαΩ(t)HJβΠ(t)≥HJαQ2(t)HJβΠ(t)+HJβR2(t)HJαΩ(t).
(d) HJαQ1(t)HJβR1(t)+HJαΩ(t)HJβΠ(t)≥HJαQ1(t)HJβΠ(t)+HJβR1(t)HJαΩ(t).
Theorem 5.6. [19] Suppose that Ω,Π:[1,∞)→R are two integrable functions satisfying (H1) and (H2). Let θ1,θ2>0 such that 1/θ1+1/θ2=1. Then, for t>1, α, β>0, the following inequalities hold:
(ⅰ) 1θ1(logt)βΓ(β+1)HJα(Q2−Ω)θ1(t)+1θ2(logt)αΓ(α+1)HJβ(R2−Π)θ2(t) ≥HJα(Q2−Ω)(t)HJβ(R2−Π)(t).
(ⅱ) 1θ1HJα(Q2−Ω)θ1(t)HJβ(R2−Π)θ1(t)+1θ2HJα(R2−Π)θ2(t)HJβ(Q2−Ω)θ2(t) ≥HJα(Q2−Ω)(R2−Π)(t)HJβ(Q2−Ω)(R2−Π)(t).
(ⅲ) 1θ1(logt)βΓ(β+1)HJα(Ω−Q1)θ1(t)+1θ2(logt)αΓ(α+1)HJβ(Π−R1)θ2(t) ≥HJα(Ω−Q1)(t)HJβ(Π−R1)(t).
(ⅳ) 1θ1HJα(Ω−Q1)θ1(t)HJβ(Π−R1)θ1(t)+1θ2HJα(Π−R1)θ2(t)HJβ(Ω−Q1)θ2(t) ≥HJα(Ω−Q1)(Π−R1)(t)HJβ(Ω−Q1)(Π−R1)(t).
Theorem 5.7. [19] Suppose that Ω,Π:[1,∞)→R are two integrable functions satisfying (H1) and (H2). Let θ1,θ2>0 such that θ1+θ2=1. Then, for t>1, α, β>0, we have:
(a) θ1(logt)βΓ(β+1)HJαQ2(t)+θ2(logt)αΓ(α+1)HJβR2(t) ≥HJα(Q2−Ω)θ1(t)HJβ(R2−Π)θ2(t)+θ1(logt)βΓ(β+1)HJαΩ(t)+θ2(logt)αΓ(α+1)HJβΠ(t).
(b) θ1HJαQ2(t)HJβR2(t)+θ1HJαΩ(t)HJβΠ(t) +θ2HJαR2(t)HJβQ2(t)+θ2HJαΠ(t)HJβΩ(t) ≥HJα(Q2−Ω)θ1(R2−Π)θ2(t)HJβ(R2−Π)θ1(Q2−Ω)θ2(t) +θ1HJαQ2(t)HJβΠ(t)+θ1HJαΩ(t)HJβR2(t) +θ2HJαR2(t)HJβΩ(t)+θ2HJαΠ(t)HJβQ2(t).
(c) θ1(logt)βΓ(β+1)HJαΩ(t)+θ2(logt)αΓ(α+1)HJβΠ(t) ≥HJα(Ω−Q1)θ1(t)HJβ(Π−R1)θ2(t)+θ1(logt)βΓ(β+1)HJαQ1(t)+θ2(logt)αΓ(α+1)HJβR1(t).
(d) θ1HJαΩ(t)HJβΠ(t)+θ1HJαQ1(t)HJβR1(t) +θ2HJαΠ(t)HJβΩ(t)+θ2HJαR1(t)HJβQ1(t) ≥HJα(Ω−Q1)θ1(Π−R1)θ2(t)HJβ(Π−R1)θ1(Ω−Q1)θ2(t) +θ1HJαΩ(t)HJβR1(t)+θ1HJαQ1(t)HJβΠ(t) +θ2HJαΠ(t)HJβQ1(t)+θ2HJαR1(t)HJβΩ(t).
Theorem 5.8. [19] Suppose that Ω,Π:[1,∞)→R are two integrable functions satisfying (H1) and (H2). Then for all t>1, α>0, we have
|(logt)αΓ(α+1)HJαΩ(t)Π(t)−HJαΩ(t)HJαΠ(t)|≤|T(Ω,Q1,Q2)|12|T(Π,R1,R2)|12, |
where T(y,z,w) is defined by
T(y,z,w)=(HJαw(t)−HJαy(t))(HJαy(t)−HJαz(t))+(logt)αΓ(α+1)HJαz(t)y(t)−HJαz(t)HJαy(t)+(logt)αΓ(α+1)HJαw(t)y(t)−HJαw(t)HJαy(t)+HJαz(t)HJαw(t)−(logt)αΓ(α+1)HJαz(t)w(t). |
In this section we present Grüss-type fractional integral inequalities concerning k-fractional integral operators.
k-fractional integral inequalities of Grüss-type are included in this section.
Definition 6.1. [20] The k-fractional integral of the Riemann-Liouville type is defined as follows:
kJαx1Ω(t)=1kΓk(α)∫tx1(x−s)αk−1Ω(s)ds,α>0,t>a. |
Theorem 6.1. [21] Assume that Ω:[0,∞) is an integrable function satisfying (H1). Then, for t>0, α,β>0, k>0, we have
kJβQ1(t)kJαΩ(t)+ kJαQ2(t)kJβΩ(t)≥ kJαQ2(t)kJβQ1(t)+ kJαΩ(t)kJβΩ(t). |
Theorem 6.2. [21] Assume that Ω:[0,∞) is an integrable function satisfying (H1). Let θ1,θ2>0 such that 1/θ1+1/θ2=1. Then, we have for t>0, α,β>0 and k>0,
1θ1tβkΓk(β+k)kJα((Q2−Ω)θ1)(t)+1θ2tαkΓk(α+k)kJβ((Ω−Q1)θ2)(t)+kJαQ2(t)kJβQ1(t)+kJαΩ(t)kJβΩ(t)≥kJαQ2(t)kJβΩ(t)+kJαΩ(t)kJβQ1(t). |
Theorem 6.3. [21] Assume that Ω:[0,∞) is an integrable function satisfying (H1). Let θ1,θ2>0 such that θ1+θ2=1. Then, for t>0, α,β>0 and k>0, we have
θ1tβkΓk(β+k)kJαQ2(t)+θ2tαkΓk(α+k)kJβΩ(t)≥kJα(Q2−Ω)θ1(t)kJβ(Ω−Q1)θ2(t)+θ1tβkΓk(β+k)kJαΩ(t)+θ2tαkΓk(α+k)kJβQ1(t). |
Theorem 6.4. [21] Assume that Ω,Π:[0,∞)→R are two integrable functions satisfying (H1) and (H2). Then, for t>0, α, β>0, k>0 we have:
(ⅰ) kJβR1(t) kJαΩ(t)+ kJαQ2(t) kJβΠ(t)≥ kJβR1(t) kJαQ2(t)+ kJαΩ(t) kJβΠ(t).
(ⅱ) kJβQ1(t) kJαΠ(t)+ kJαR2(t) kJβΩ(t)≥ kJβQ1(t) kJαR2(t)+ kJβΩ(t) kJαΠ(t).
(ⅲ) kJαQ2(t) kJβR2(t)+ kJαΩ(t) kJβΠ(t)≥ kJαQ2(t) kJβΠ(t)+ kJβR2(t) kJαΩ(t).
(ⅳ) kJαQ1(t)JβR1(t)+ kJαΩ(t) kJβΠ(t)≥ kJαQ1(t) kJβΠ(t)+ kJβR1(t) kJαΩ(t).
Theorem 6.5. [21] Assume that Ω,Π:[0,∞)→R are two integrable functions satisfying (H1) and (H2). Then for all t>0, α>0, k>0, we have
|tαkΓk(α+k) kJαΩ(t)Π(t)− kJαΩ(t) kJαΠ(t)|≤√T(Ω,Q1,Q2)T(Π,R1,R2), |
where
T(y,z,w)=( kJαw(t)− kJαy(t))( kJαy(t)− kJαz(t))+tαkΓk(α+k) kJαz(t)y(t)−kJαz(t) kJαy(t)+tαkΓk(α+k)Jαw(t)y(t)−kJαw(t) kJαy(t)+kJαz(t) kJαw(t)−tαkΓk(α+k) kJαz(t)w(t). |
Theorem 6.6. [22] Assume that (H) holds on [x1,x2] and p be a positive function on [x1,x2]. Then for all t>0, k>0,α>0, we have
|(kJαx1p(t))(kJαx1p(t)Ω(t)Π(t))−(kJαx1p(t)Ω(t))(kJαx1p(t)Π(t))|≤(kJαx1p(t))24(M−m)(P−p). |
Theorem 6.7. [22] Let the assumptions of Theorem 6.6 be satisfied. Then, for all t>0, k>0,α,β>0, t he following inequality holds:
[(kJαx1p(t))(kJβx1p(t)Ω(t)Π(t))+(kJβx1p(t))(kJαx1p(t)Ω(t)Π(t))−(kJαx1p(t)Ω(t))(kJαx1p(t)Π(t))−(kJβx1p(t)Ω(t))(kJαx1p(t)Π(t))]2≤{[M(kJαx1p(t))−(kJαx1p(t)Ω(t))][(kJβx1p(t)Ω(t))−m(kJβx1p(t))]+[(kJαx1p(t)Ω(t))−m(kJαx1p(t))][M(kJβx1p(t))−(kJβx1pΩ(t))]}×{[P(kJαx1p(t))−(kJαx1p(t)Π(t))][(kJβx1p(t)Π(t))−p(kJβx1p(t))]+[(kJαx1p(t)Π(t))−p(kJαx1p(t))][P(kJβx1p(t))−(kJβx1p(t)Π(t))]}. |
Definition 6.2. [23] Let ψ be a positive and increasing function on [x1,x2]. Then the left-sided and right-sided generalized Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals of a function Ω with respect to another function ψ of order α>0 are defined by
Jα,ψx1+,kΩ(t)=1kΓk(α)∫tx1(ψ(t)−ψ(s))αk−1ψ′(s)Ω(s)ds,t>x1, |
Jα,ψx2−,kΩ(t)=1kΓk(α)∫x2t(ψ(s)−ψ(t))αk−1ψ′(s)Ω(s)ds,t<x2. |
Theorem 6.8. [23] Assume that Ω:[0,∞)→R is an integrable function satisfying (H1). Then, for t>0, α,β>0, k>0, we have:
Jβ,ψ0+,kQ1(t)Jα,ψ0+,kΩ(t)+ Jα,ψ0+,kQ2(t)Jβ,ψ0+,kΩ(t)≥ Jα,ψ0+,kQ2(t)Jβ,ψ0+,kQ1(t)+ Jα,ψ0+,kΩ(t)Jβ,ψ0+,kΩ(t). |
Theorem 6.9. [23] Suppose that are two integrable functions satisfying and Assume that is a positive and increasing function with and continuous on Then, for , , , we have:
(ⅰ)
(ⅱ)
(ⅲ)
(ⅳ)
Theorem 6.10. [23] Suppose that are two integrable functions satisfying and Assume that is a positive and increasing function on such that and is continuous on Then for all , , , we have
where
Definition 7.1. [24] The function is said to be if
Definition 7.2. [24] The (generalized gamma function) is defined by
Definition 7.3. [24] The function is defined by
where and is a bounded sequence of positive real numbers.
Definition 7.4. [24] Let and Assume that is an increasing function for which is continuous on Then the left and right generalized -fractional integrals of the function with respect to on are defined by
and
respectively.
Theorem 7.1. [24] Let and holds. Then we have:
Theorem 7.2. [24] Under the assumptions of Theorem 7.1, we have:
Theorem 7.3. [24] Let satifying and for all Then we have
where and are defined as
respectively.
Theorem 7.4. [24] Under the assumptions of Theorem 7.3, we have
Now we present certain other associated fractional integral inequalities.
Theorem 7.5. [24] Let and and Then we have:
Theorem 7.6. [24] Assume that are two positive and integrable functions such that
Then we have
In this section we define a generalized left sided tempered fractional integral with respect to another function. Then we present Grüss-type integral inequalities.
Definition 8.1. [16] Suppose and the function is positive, and increasing with continuous derivative and Then the Lebesgue real-valued measurable function defined on is said to be in the space for which
When then
Definition 8.2. [25] Suppose that with and The tempered fractional left sided integral is defined by
Definition 8.3. [26] Let be an integrable function in the space and assume that is positive, and increasing with continuous derivative and Then the generalized left sided tempered fractional integral of a function with respect to another function is defined by
where , with
Theorem 8.1. [27] Suppose that and assume that is positive, and increasing with continuous derivative and Moreover, we assume that holds. Then for we have
Theorem 8.2. [27] Assume that are two integrable functions satisfying and In addition, we suppose that is positive, and increasing with continuous derivative and Then, for and the following inequalities hold:
We present in the next certain other types of inequalities for tempered fractional integral.
Theorem 8.3. [27] Assume that the assumptions on Theorem 8.2 hold. If are such that then, for we have:
Theorem 8.4. [27] Assume that the assumptions on Theorem 8.2 hold. If are such that then, for we have:
Theorem 8.5. [27] Assume that the assumptions on Theorem 8.2 hold. Let be such that Suppose that
Then, for we have:
In this section we deal with Grüss-type integral inequalities concerning conformable fractional integrals.
We now introduced the definition of the generalized mixed -conformable fractional integral.
Definition 9.1. [28] Assume that and is defined on Then the mixed left -conformable generalized fractional integral of is defined by
and the mixed right -conformable generalized fractional integral of is defined by
Theorem 9.1. [28] Assume that is an integrable function satisfying and Then, we have:
Theorem 9.2. [28] Assume that are two integrable function satisfying and and Then we have:
(ⅰ).
(ⅱ).
(ⅲ).
(ⅳ).
Theorem 9.3. [28] Assume that are two integrable function satisfying and and Then:
where
The -fractional conformable integral operator is defined as
Definition 9.2. [29] Let be an integrable function, and The -fractional conformable integral operator is defined as
Here, we present Grüss type inequalities involving the -fractional conformable integral defined in Definition 9.2.
Theorem 9.4. [29] Assume that is an integrable function satisfying and Then we have:
Theorem 9.5. [29] Assume that are two integrable function satisfyingt and and Then we have:
(ⅰ).
(ⅱ).
(ⅲ).
(ⅳ).
Theorem 9.6. [29] Assume that are two integrable function satisfyingt and and Then we have:
where
Definition 9.3. [30] Let We define the left and right sided fractional conformable integral operators as
For the results in this section we consider
Theorem 9.7. [30] Suppose that is an integrable function satisfying Then for we have:
Theorem 9.8. [30] Assume that are two integrable functions satisfying and Then for we have:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Theorem 9.9. [30] Assume that are two integrable functions satisfying and Then for we have:
where
Definition 10.1. [31] The proportional fractional integrals, left- and right-sided, of a function of order and are defined by
and
where
In what follows, we present Grüss-type inequality with the help of the proportional fractional integral defined above.
Theorem 10.1. [31] Assume that is an integrable function satisfying Then:
Theorem 10.2. [31] Let Suppose that are two integrable functions satisfying and Then the following inequalities hold:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Theorem 10.3. [31] Let and satisfying and be two positive integrable functions. Then we have:
Theorem 10.4. [31] Let the assumptions of Theorem 10.1 be hold. In addition, let
Then, we have:
Definition 10.2. [32] Assume that is integrable and is a strictly increasing continuous function on For we define the left- and right-sided proportional -fractional integrals, respectively, as
and
In what follows, we present Grüss-type inequality with the help of the generalized -fractional integral.
Theorem 10.5. [32] Let be positive integrable functions. satisfying with positive integrable functions and be a strictly increasing continuous function. Tthen the following inequality also holds:
where
Definition 11.1. A function is said to be if
Definition 11.2. [33] Let The Riemann-Liouville generalized fractional integral of of order and is defined by
In this section, we present some Grüss type inequalities via the fractional integral defined in Definition 11.2.
Theorem 11.1. [34] Let satisfying and Then we have the following inequality:
Theorem 11.2. [34] Assume that are two integrable functions satisfying and and Then we have the following inequalities:
(ⅰ)
(ⅱ)
(ⅲ)
(ⅳ)
Theorem 11.3. [35] Under the assumptions of Theorem 11.2 we have for all and
where
Now we define -Riemann-Liouville fractional integral.
Definition 11.3. [33] Let be a continuous function. Then -Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of of order is defined by
where
Now, for the generalized -Riemann-Liouville fractional integral defined above, we give some Grüss type inequalities.
Theorem 11.4. [35] Let satisfying and Then we have the following inequality:
Theorem 11.5. [35] Assume that two integrable functions satisfying and and Then we have:
(ⅰ)
(ⅱ)
(ⅲ)
(ⅳ)
Theorem 11.6. [35] Under the assumptions of Theorem 11.5 we have for all and
where
In this section, we present the Grüss-type fractional integral inequalities involving the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional integral.
Definition 12.1. [36] Assume that such that We define the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional integral of a function of order by
Theorem 12.1. [37] Assume that is an integrable function satisfying Then, for , , , we have:
Theorem 12.2. [37] Suppose that are two integrable functions satisfying and Then, for , , , we have the inequalities:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Theorem 12.3. [37] Assume that are two integrable functions satisfying and Then for all , , we have:
where
In this section, Grüss-type fractional integral inequalities are presented via Saigo fractional integer operator.
Definition 13.1. [38] Assume that The Saigo fractional integral of order for a real-valued continuous function is defined by
where is the Gaussian hypergeometric function defined by
and is the Pochhammer symbol
Theorem 13.1. [39] Assume that are two integrable functions satisfying and Then for all one has
where
Theorem 13.2. [39] Suppose that are two integrable functions satisfying and Then for all we have:
We define a fractional integral associated with the Gauss hypergeometric function as follows:
Definition 13.2. [40] Let For we define a fractional integral as follows:
where is the right-hand sided Gauss hypergeometric fractional integral of order defined in Definition 13.1.
We present integral inequalities of Grüss type for the above defined hypergeometric fractional integral.
Theorem 13.3. [40] Let satisfying the condition on Then for all we have
Theorem 13.4. [40] Let and be two synchronous functions on Then the following inequality holds:
Another fractional integral operator associated with the Gauss hypergeometric function is defined as follows.
Definition 13.3. [41] Let For we define a fractional integral as follows:
where is the right-hand sided Gauss hypergeometric fractional integral of order defined by
and is the Gaussian hypergeometric function defined in Definition 13.1.
We establish two Grüss-type fractional integral inequalities involving the Gauss hypergeometric function.
Theorem 13.5. [41] Assume that are two integrable functions satisfying the condition on Then, for all and with and we have:
Theorem 13.6. [41] Suppose that are two synchronous functions (i.e ). Then, for all and with and we have:
Now we give some Grüss-type inequalities for generalized hypergeometric function fractional order integral operators. We start with the following definitions.
Definition 13.4. [42] Let and Then the Saigo and Maeda fractional integral operator of order for a real-valued continuous function is defined by
where is the Appell hypergeometric function defined by
and is the Pochhammer symbol.
Definition 13.5. [43] Assume that such that
Then we define a fractional integral operator
where is the Saigo-Maeda fractional integral of order
The main results for Grüss inequalities are given now.
Theorem 13.7. [43] Assume that is an integrable function satisfying the condition for all Then for we have:
provided
Theorem 13.8. [43] Assume that (H) holds on In addition, let Then for and we have:
Theorem 13.9. [43] Let and be two synchronous functions on and let Then for all
In this section we present Grüss-type integral inequalities via quantum calculus.
Definition 14.1. [44] The Jakson's -derivarive and -integral of a function defined on are, respectively, given by
Definition 14.2. [45] The Riemann-Liouville fractional -integral operator of a function of order is given by
where
and
Now, we present some -Grüss integral inequalities.
Theorem 14.1. [46] Assume that are two integrable functions satisfyingt and Then, for and we have:
where
Definition 14.3. [47] Assume is a continuous function and let . Then the expression
is called the -derivative on of function at .
Definition 14.4. [47] Assume is a continuous function. Then the -integral on is defined by
for . Moreover, if then the definite -integral on is defined by
Theorem 14.2. [47] Assume are continuous functions on satisfying the vondition Then we have the inequality
Now, we are going to present the -Grüss-ebyev integral inequality on interval .
Theorem 14.3. [47] Let be , -Lipschitzian continuous functions on , so that
for all . Then we have:
Let and let be any interval of containing and denote by the set
Definition 14.5. [44] Let The -symmetric difference operator of is defined by
and
Definition 14.6. [44] Suppose that and For and for the -symmetric integral of is given by
where
provided that the series converges at and
Now, the concepts of -symmetric derivative and -symmetric integral are extended on finite intervals. We fix Let be an interval containing and be a constant. For a function we define the -symmetric derivative at a point as follows:
Definition 14.7. [48] Assume that is continuous and The -symmetric derivative of at is defined as
Definition 14.8. [48] Assume that is a continuous function. The -symmetric integral is defined as
Now, we present -symmetric analogue of Grüss-Chebyshev integral inequality.
Theorem 14.4. [48] Let and be -Lipschitzian continuous functions on so that
for all Then:
The following concepts are adapted by Ref. ([49]). We state a -shifting operator as
The -analog is stated by
The number is stated by
The -Gamma function is stated by
Here, we add some definitions regarding fractional -calculus, namely the Riemann-Liouville fractional -integral.
Definition 14.9. [49] Let and function be a continuous stated on Then is given by
Now, we present the fractional -Grüss integral inequality on the interval
Theorem 14.5. [50] Let be continuous functions satisfying For and we have the inequality
Next, we give the fractional -Grüss-Čebyšev integral inequality on the interval
Theorem 14.6. [50] Let be -, -Lipschitzian continuous functions, so that
for all and Then we have the inequality
In this section we give Grüss-type integral inequalities via fractional Hilfer derivative operators.
In this section we present several integral inequalities for the -Hilfer fractional derivative operator.
Definition 15.1. [51] Let Then the following
is called the Hiler -fractional derivative.
Theorem 15.1. [51] Let and be a positive function on and let denote the Hilfer -fractional derivative of order and type Suppose that:
There exist such that
for all
Then
In this section, we present inequalities of the Grüss-type via -fractional Hilfer-Katugampola generalized derivative.
Definition 15.2. [52] Let and The generalized -fractional Hilfer-Katugampola derivatives (left-sided and right-sided) are defined as
where
Theorem 15.2. [52] Let and be positive integrable function on satisfying Then we have:
Theorem 15.3. [52] Let and be positive integrable functions on satisfying and Then we have:
Theorem 15.4. [52] Let and be positive integrable functions on satisfying and If and then we have:
Theorem 15.5. [52] Let and be positive integrable functions on Let
Then we have:
Our objective in this paper was to present a comprehensive and up-to-date review on Grüss-type inequalities for fractional differential operators. We presented results including inequalities of the Grüss-type for different kinds of fractional integral and differential operators. Grüss-type inequalities for fractional integrals of Riemann-Liouville, Katugampola, Hadamard's, Raina's, tempered, conformable, proportional, Caputo-Fabrizio, Saigo's are included. Moreover Grüss-type inequalities concerning Hilfer fractional differential operators and quantum Grüss-type integral inequalities are also presented. We believe that the present survey will provide a platform for the researchers working on Grüss-type inequalities to learn about the available work on the topic before developing the new results. Future research regarding this review paper is fascinating. Our review paper might inspire a good number of additional studies.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project no. (IFKSUOR3-340-1).
The authors declare that they do not have conflict of interest regarding this manuscript.
[1] | Pocketbook FS (2015) World food and agriculture. FAO Rome Italy . |
[2] |
Ashraf M, Athar HR, Harris PJC, et al. (2008) Some prospective strategies for improving crop salt tolerance. Adv Agron 97: 45-110. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(07)00002-8
![]() |
[3] |
Ali MA, Naveed M, Mustafa A, et al. (2017) The good, the bad, and the ugly of rhizosphere microbiome. Probiotics Plant Health Singapore: Springer, 253-290. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-3473-2_11
![]() |
[4] |
Munns R, Tester M (2008) Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59: 651-681. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911
![]() |
[5] |
Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA, Zhu JK, et al. (2000) Plant cellular and molecular resopnses to high salinity. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 51: 463-499. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.51.1.463
![]() |
[6] |
Tabatabaei S, Ehsanzadeh P (2016) Photosynthetic pigments, ionic and antioxidative behaviour of hulled tetraploid wheat in response to NaCl. Photosynthetica 54: 340-350. doi: 10.1007/s11099-016-0083-3
![]() |
[7] |
Munns R (2002) Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ 25: 239-250. doi: 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x
![]() |
[8] |
Shrivastava P, Kumar R (2015) Soil salinity: A serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J Biol Sci 22: 123-131. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.12.001
![]() |
[9] |
Turan M, Yildirim E, Kitir N, et al. (2017) Beneficial role of plant growth-promoting bacteria in vegetable production under abiotic stress. Microbial Strategies for Vegetable Production 151-166. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-54401-4_7
![]() |
[10] |
Gouda S, Kerry RG, Das G, et al. (2018) Revitalization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable development in agriculture. Microbiol Res 206: 131-140. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2017.08.016
![]() |
[11] |
Nagargade M, Tyagi V, Singh MK (2018) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: a biological approach toward the production of sustainable agriculture. Role of Rhizospheric Microbes in Soil Singapore: Springer, 205-223. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-8402-7_8
![]() |
[12] |
Bhattacharyya PN, Jha DK (2012) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28: 1327-1350. doi: 10.1007/s11274-011-0979-9
![]() |
[13] |
Egamberdieva D, Lugtenberg B (2014) Use of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria to alleviate salinity atress in plants. Use of Microbes for the Alleviation of Soil Stresses New York: Springer, 73-96. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-9466-9_4
![]() |
[14] |
Shameer S, Prasad TNVKV (2018) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable agricultural practices with special reference to biotic and abiotic stresses. Plant Growth Regul 84: 603-615. doi: 10.1007/s10725-017-0365-1
![]() |
[15] |
Yao L, Wu Z, Zheng Y, et al. (2010) Growth promotion and protection against salt stress by Pseudomonas putida Rs-198 on cotton. Eur J Soil Biol 46: 49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2009.11.002
![]() |
[16] | Dasgupta D, Ghati A, Sarkar A, et al. (2015) Application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) isolated from the rhizosphere of Sesbania bispinosa on the Growth of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 4: 1033-1042. |
[17] | Singh RP, Shelke GM, Kumar A, et al. (2015) Biochemistry and genetics of ACC deaminase: a weapon to ‘stress ethylene’ produced in plants. Front Microbiol 6: 937. |
[18] |
Bharti N, Barnawal D (2019) Amelioration of salinity stress by PGPR: ACC deaminase and ROS scavenging enzymes activity. PGPR Amelioration in Sustainable Agriculture Woodhead Publishing, 85-106. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-815879-1.00005-7
![]() |
[19] |
Ramadoss D, Lakkineni VK, Bose P, et al. (2013) Mitigation of salt stress in wheat seedlings by halotolerant bacteria isolated from saline habitats. SpringerPlus 2: 6. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-6
![]() |
[20] |
Marques APGC, Pires C, Moreira H, et al. (2010) Assessment of the plant growth promotion abilities of six bacterial isolates using Zea mays as indicator plant. Soil Biol Biochem 42: 1229-1235. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.04.014
![]() |
[21] |
Ji SH, Gururani MA, Chun SC (2014) Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting endophytic diazotrophic bacteria from Korean rice cultivars. Microbiol Res 169: 83-98. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2013.06.003
![]() |
[22] |
Dell' Amico E, Cavalca L, Andreoni V (2005) Analysis of rhizobacterial communities in perennial Graminaceae from polluted water meadow soil, and screening of metal-resistant, potentially plant growth-promoting bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 52: 153-162. doi: 10.1016/j.femsec.2004.11.005
![]() |
[23] |
Duan J, Müler KM, Charles TC, et al. (2009) 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylate (ACC) Deaminase Genes in Rhizobia from Southern Saskatchewan. Microb Ecol 57: 423-436. doi: 10.1007/s00248-008-9407-6
![]() |
[24] |
Bric JM, Bostock RM, Silverstone SE (1991) Rapid in situ assay for indoleacetic acid production by bacteria immobilized on a nitrocellulose membrane. Appl Environ Microbiol 57: 535-538. doi: 10.1128/AEM.57.2.535-538.1991
![]() |
[25] |
Adler J (1966) Effect of amino acids and oxygen on chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 92: 121-129. doi: 10.1128/JB.92.1.121-129.1966
![]() |
[26] | Al Shorouk City, Egypt Weather History|Weather Underground. Available from: https://www.wunderground.com/history/monthly/eg/al-shorouk-city/HECA/date/2019-5. |
[27] | Minolta K (1989) Chlorophyll meter SPAD-502 instruction manual. Available from: https://www.konicaminolta.com/instruments/download/catalog/color/pdf/spad502plus_catalog_eng.pdf. |
[28] |
Liu X, Huang B (2000) Heat stress injury in relation to membrane lipid peroxidation in creeping bentgrass. Crop Sci 40: 503-510. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2000.402503x
![]() |
[29] | Goudarzi M, Pakniyat H (2008) Evaluation of wheat cultivars under salinity stress based on some agronomic and physiological traits. J Agri Soc Sci 4: 4. |
[30] | Steel RG (1997) Pinciples and procedures of statistics a biometrical approach. |
[31] | Falconer DS (1989) Introduction to quantitative genetics 3rd ed.. Harlow Longman Sci Tech . |
[32] | Nadarajan N (2005) Quantitative genetics and biometrical techniques in plant breeding Kalyani Publishers. |
[33] | Allard RW (1999) Principles of plant breeding John Wiley & Sons. |
[34] |
JOHNSON H (1955) Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agron J 47: 314-318. doi: 10.2134/agronj1955.00021962004700070009x
![]() |
[35] | Miles AG (1992) Biological Nitrogen Fixation Springer Science & Business Media. |
[36] |
Anzai Y, Kim H, Park JY, et al. (2000) Phylogenetic affiliation of the pseudomonads based on 16S rRNA sequence. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50: 1563-1589. doi: 10.1099/00207713-50-4-1563
![]() |
[37] |
Solanki MK, Wang Z, Wang FY, et al. (2017) Intercropping in sugarcane cultivation influenced the soil properties and enhanced the diversity of vital diazotrophic bacteria. Sugar Tech 19: 136-147. doi: 10.1007/s12355-016-0445-y
![]() |
[38] |
Santi C, Bogusz D, Franche C (2013) Biological nitrogen fixation in non-legume plants. Ann Bot 111: 743-767. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct048
![]() |
[39] |
Carvalho TLG, Ballesteros HGF, Thiebaut F, et al. (2016) Nice to meet you: genetic, epigenetic and metabolic controls of plant perception of beneficial associative and endophytic diazotrophic bacteria in non-leguminous plants. Plant Mol Biol 90: 561-574. doi: 10.1007/s11103-016-0435-1
![]() |
[40] |
Cassán F, Vanderleyden J, Spaepen S (2014) Physiological and agronomical aspects of phytohormone production by model plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) belonging to the genus azospirillum. J Plant Growth Regul 33: 440-459. doi: 10.1007/s00344-013-9362-4
![]() |
[41] |
Verma JP, Jaiswal DK, Krishna R, et al. (2018) Characterization and screening of thermophilic Bacillus strains for developing plant growth promoting consortium from hot spring of Leh and Ladakh Region of India. Front Microbiol 9: 1293. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01293
![]() |
[42] | Hussain S, Khaliq A, Matloob A, et al. (2013) Germination and growth response of three wheat cultivars to NaCl salinity. Plant Soil Environ 31: 36-43. |
[43] |
Wang C, Knill E, Glick BR, et al. (2000) Effect of transferring 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase genes into Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHA0 and its gacA derivative CHA96 on their growth-promoting and disease-suppressive capacities. Can J Microbiol 46: 898-907. doi: 10.1139/w00-071
![]() |
[44] |
Glick BR, Jacobson CB, Schwarze MMK, et al. (1994) 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase mutants of the plant growth promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12-2 do not stimulate canola root elongation. Can J Microbiol 40: 911-915. doi: 10.1139/m94-146
![]() |
[45] |
Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick BR (2004) Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance in tomato plants to salt stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 42: 565-572. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2004.05.009
![]() |
[46] | Kaya MD, Ipek A (2003) Effects of different soil salinity levels on germination and seedling growth of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Turk J Agric For 27: 221-227. |
[47] | El-Shraiy AM, Hegazi AM, Hikal MS (2016) Nodule formation, antioxidant enzymes activities and other biochemical changes in salt stressed faba bean plants treated with glycine betaine, arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi and yeast extract. Middle East J Appl Sci 6: 1076-1099. |
[48] |
Egamberdieva D (2009) Alleviation of salt stress by plant growth regulators and IAA producing bacteria in wheat. Acta Physiol Plant 31: 861-864. doi: 10.1007/s11738-009-0297-0
![]() |
[49] |
Tiwari S, Singh P, Tiwari R, et al. (2011) Salt-tolerant rhizobacteria-mediated induced tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum) and chemical diversity in rhizosphere enhance plant growth. Biol Fertil Soils 47: 907. doi: 10.1007/s00374-011-0598-5
![]() |
[50] | Ansari FA, Ahmad I (2018) Plant growth promoting attributes and alleviation of salinity stress to wheat by biofilm forming Brevibacterium sp. FAB3 isolated from rhizospheric soil. Saudi J Biol Sci . |
[51] |
Gange AC, Gadhave KR (2018) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria promote plant size inequality. Sci Rep 8: 13828. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32111-z
![]() |
[52] |
Glick BR, Penrose DM, Li J (1998) A model for the lowering of plant ethylene concentrations by plant growth-promoting bacteria. J Theor Biol 190: 63-68. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1997.0532
![]() |
[53] |
Saravanakumar D, Samiyappan R (2007) ACC deaminase from Pseudomonas fluorescens mediated saline resistance in groundnut (Arachis hypogea) plants. J Appl Microbiol 102: 1283-1292. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03179.x
![]() |
[54] |
Etesami H, Beattie GA (2018) Mining halophytes for plant growth-promoting halotolerant bacteria to enhance the salinity tolerance of non-halophytic crops. Front Microbiol 9: 148. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00148
![]() |
[55] |
Pushpavalli R, Quealy J, Colmer TD, et al. (2016) Salt stress delayed flowering and reduced reproductive success of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), a response associated with Na+ accumulation in leaves. J Agron Crop Sci 202: 125-138. doi: 10.1111/jac.12128
![]() |
[56] |
Pirasteh-Anosheh H, Ranjbar G, Pakniyat H, et al. (2015) Physiological mechanisms of salt stress tolerance in plants. Plant-Environment Interaction John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 141-160. doi: 10.1002/9781119081005.ch8
![]() |
[57] |
El-Hendawy SE, Hu Y, Schmidhalter U (2007) Assessing the suitability of various physiological traits to screen wheat genotypes for salt tolerance. J Integr Plant Biol 49: 1352-1360. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2007.00533.x
![]() |
[58] | KHAN MA (2009) Role of proline, K/Na ratio and chlorophyll content in salt tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Pak J Bot 41: 633-638. |
[59] |
Arkus KAJ, Cahoon EB, Jez JM (2005) Mechanistic analysis of wheat chlorophyllase. Arch Biochem Biophys 438: 146-155. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2005.04.019
![]() |
[60] |
Mishra S, Tyagi A, Singh IV, et al. (2006) Changes in lipid profile during growth and senescence of Catharanthus roseus leaf. Braz J Plant Physiol 18: 447-454. doi: 10.1590/S1677-04202006000400002
![]() |
[61] |
Kaur P, Kaur J, Kaur S, et al. (2014) Salinity induced physiological and biochemical changes in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. J Appl Nat Sci 6: 578-588. doi: 10.31018/jans.v6i2.500
![]() |
[62] |
Mahlooji M, Seyed Sharifi R, Razmjoo J, et al. (2018) Effect of salt stress on photosynthesis and physiological parameters of three contrasting barley genotypes. Photosynthetica 56: 549-556. doi: 10.1007/s11099-017-0699-y
![]() |
[63] |
Harinasut P, Poonsopa D, Roengmongkol K, et al. (2003) Salinity effects on antioxidant enzymes in mulberry cultivar. Sci Asia 29: 109-113. doi: 10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2003.29.109
![]() |
[64] |
Katsuhara M, Otsuka T, Ezaki B (2005) Salt stress-induced lipid peroxidation is reduced by glutathione S-transferase, but this reduction of lipid peroxides is not enough for a recovery of root growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci 2: 369-373. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.03.030
![]() |
[65] | Aghaleh M, Niknam V (2009) Effect of salinity on some physiological and biochemical parameters in explants of two cultivars of soybean (Glyicine max L.). J Phytol 1: 86-94. |
[66] |
Sreenivasulu N, Ramanjulu S, Ramachandra-Kini K, et al. (1999) Total peroxidase activity and peroxidase isoforms as modified by salt stress in two cultivars of fox-tail millet with differential salt tolerance. Plant Sci 141: 1-9. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00204-0
![]() |
[67] |
Nazar R, Iqbal N, Syeed S, et al. (2011) Salicylic acid alleviates decreases in photosynthesis under salt stress by enhancing nitrogen and sulfur assimilation and antioxidant metabolism differentially in two mungbean cultivars. J Plant Physiol 168: 807-815. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.11.001
![]() |
[68] | Weisany W, Sohrabi Y, Heidari G, et al. (2012) Changes in antioxidant enzymes activity and plant performance by salinity stress and zinc application in soybean (Glycine max L.). Plant Omics J 5: 60-67. |
[69] |
Zhang JL, Aziz M, Qiao Y, et al. (2014) Soil microbe Bacillus subtilis (GB03) induces biomass accumulation and salt tolerance with lower sodium accumulation in wheat. Crop Pasture Sci 65: 423-427. doi: 10.1071/CP13456
![]() |
[70] | Fellahi Z, Hannachi A, Guendouz A, et al. (2013) Genetic variability, heritability and association studies in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Electron J Plant Breed 4: 1161-1166. |
1. | HUI-YAN CHENG, IBRAHIM MEKAWY, JUAN WANG, HUMERA BATOOL, MUHAMMAD IMRAN QURESHI, ANALYSIS OF NEWTON AND HERMITE–HADAMARD-TYPE LOCAL FRACTIONAL INTEGRAL INEQUALITIES ON FRACTAL SETS USING GENERALIZED PRE-INVEXITY, 2025, 33, 0218-348X, 10.1142/S0218348X25401036 |