In this study, we developed a nonlinear mean-field penetration model for car-following dynamics to examine how partial penetration of connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs) alters traffic-wave stability on a single-lane ring road. The model extends classical optimal-velocity dynamics through two penetration-scaled mechanisms: An anticipative headway correction and a cooperative speed-difference damping term. The homogeneous equilibrium was derived in closed form, and linearization with Fourier perturbations yielded an explicit characteristic equation. A long-wave expansion then yielded a tractable stability theorem together with a closed-form formula for the critical penetration threshold. For the baseline parameters $ a = 2.8 $, $ \sigma = 0.8 $, $ \kappa = 2.0 $, $ h = 13 $ m, $ {v}_{\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{x}} = 30 $ m/s, $ {s}_{c} = 10 $ m, and $ \ell = 5 $ m, the asymptotic threshold was $ {p}_{c}\approx 0.173 $, which was close to the exact discrete threshold $ {p}_{c}\approx 0.171 $ obtained from the linearized finite-ring system. Ring-road simulations confirmed the theoretical trend: When $ p = 0 $, stop-and-go waves persist and reduce the mean speed to $ 19.17 $ m/s, whereas at $ p = 0.4 $, perturbations are strongly damped, the terminal speed dispersion falls to $ 0.109 $ m/s, and the minimum simulated headway increases to $ 12.90 $ m. The main contribution is not a new optimal-velocity law, but a penetration-scaled mean-field closure that combines anticipative headway correction and cooperative speed-difference damping in an analytically tractable form, yielding an explicit critical-penetration formula and stability maps. The reported minimum headway is used only as a spacing-regularity indicator and operational surrogate; it should not be interpreted as a formal safety guarantee.
Citation: Shihlin Lin. Nonlinear stability and critical penetration analysis of mixed autonomous traffic with anticipative optimal-velocity control[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2026, 11(6): 15302-15323. doi: 10.3934/math.2026629
In this study, we developed a nonlinear mean-field penetration model for car-following dynamics to examine how partial penetration of connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs) alters traffic-wave stability on a single-lane ring road. The model extends classical optimal-velocity dynamics through two penetration-scaled mechanisms: An anticipative headway correction and a cooperative speed-difference damping term. The homogeneous equilibrium was derived in closed form, and linearization with Fourier perturbations yielded an explicit characteristic equation. A long-wave expansion then yielded a tractable stability theorem together with a closed-form formula for the critical penetration threshold. For the baseline parameters $ a = 2.8 $, $ \sigma = 0.8 $, $ \kappa = 2.0 $, $ h = 13 $ m, $ {v}_{\mathrm{m}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{x}} = 30 $ m/s, $ {s}_{c} = 10 $ m, and $ \ell = 5 $ m, the asymptotic threshold was $ {p}_{c}\approx 0.173 $, which was close to the exact discrete threshold $ {p}_{c}\approx 0.171 $ obtained from the linearized finite-ring system. Ring-road simulations confirmed the theoretical trend: When $ p = 0 $, stop-and-go waves persist and reduce the mean speed to $ 19.17 $ m/s, whereas at $ p = 0.4 $, perturbations are strongly damped, the terminal speed dispersion falls to $ 0.109 $ m/s, and the minimum simulated headway increases to $ 12.90 $ m. The main contribution is not a new optimal-velocity law, but a penetration-scaled mean-field closure that combines anticipative headway correction and cooperative speed-difference damping in an analytically tractable form, yielding an explicit critical-penetration formula and stability maps. The reported minimum headway is used only as a spacing-regularity indicator and operational surrogate; it should not be interpreted as a formal safety guarantee.
| [1] |
M. Bando, K. Hasebe, A. Nakayama, A. Shibata, Y. Sugiyama, Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation, Phys. Rev. E, 51 (1995), 1035–1042. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.51.1035 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.51.1035
|
| [2] |
R. Jiang, Q. Wu, Z. Zhu, Full velocity difference model for a car-following theory, Phys. Rev. E, 64 (2001), 017101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.017101 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.017101
|
| [3] |
R. Chandler, R. Herman, E. Montroll, Traffic dynamics: studies in car following, Oper. Res., 6 (1958), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.6.2.165 doi: 10.1287/opre.6.2.165
|
| [4] |
G. Newell, Nonlinear effects in the dynamics of car following, Oper. Res., 9 (1961), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.9.2.209 doi: 10.1287/opre.9.2.209
|
| [5] |
M. Lighthill, G. Whitham, On kinematic waves Ⅱ: a theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads, Proc. A, 229 (1955), 317–345. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1955.0089 doi: 10.1098/rspa.1955.0089
|
| [6] | P. Richards, Shock waves on the highway, Oper. Res., 4 (1956), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.4.1.42 |
| [7] |
A. Aw, M. Rascle, Resurrection of "second order" models of traffic flow, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 60 (2000), 916–938. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036139997332099 doi: 10.1137/S0036139997332099
|
| [8] |
H. Zhang, A non-equilibrium traffic model devoid of gas-like behavior, Transport. Res. B-Meth., 36 (2002), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00050-3 doi: 10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00050-3
|
| [9] |
A. Talebpour, H. Mahmassani, Influence of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow stability and throughput, Transport. Res. C-Emer., 71 (2016), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.07.007 doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2016.07.007
|
| [10] | R. E. Stern, S. Cui, M. L. Delle Monache, R. Bhadani, M. Bunting, M. Churchill, et al., Dissipation of stop-and-go waves via control of autonomous vehicles: field experiments, Transport. Res. C-Emer., 89 (2018), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.02.005 |
| [11] |
L. Davis, Effect of adaptive cruise control systems on traffic flow, Phys. Rev. E, 69 (2004), 066110. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066110 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066110
|
| [12] |
G. Orosz, R. Wilson, G. Stépán, Traffic jams: dynamics and control, Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 368 (2010), 4455–4479. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0205 doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0205
|
| [13] |
V. Milanés, S. Shladover, Modeling cooperative and autonomous adaptive cruise control dynamic responses using experimental data, Transport. Res. C-Emer., 48 (2014), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.09.001 doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2014.09.001
|
| [14] |
J. I. Ge, G. Orosz, Dynamics of connected vehicle systems with delayed acceleration feedback, Transport. Res. C-Emer., 46 (2014), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.04.014 doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2014.04.014
|
| [15] |
K. Huang, X. Di, Q. Du, X. Chen, Scalable traffic stability analysis in mixed-autonomy using continuum models, Transport. Res. C-Emer., 111 (2020), 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.01.007 doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.01.007
|
| [16] |
L. Ma, S. Qu, J. Ren, X. Zhang, Mixed traffic flow of human-driven vehicles and connected autonomous vehicles: string stability and fundamental diagram, Math. Biosci. Eng., 20 (2023), 2280–2295. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2023107 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023107
|
| [17] |
F. Chou, A. Keimer, A. Bayen, Stability of ring roads and string stability of car following models, Math. Control Relat. F., 14 (2024), 1752–1775. https://doi.org/10.3934/mcrf.2024062 doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2024062
|
| [18] |
M. Treiber, A. Kesting, D. Helbing, Influence of reaction times and anticipation on stability of vehicular traffic flow, Transport. Res. Rec., 1999 (2007), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.3141/1999-03 doi: 10.3141/1999-03
|
| [19] |
B. Ciuffo, K. Mattas, M. Makridis, G. Albano, A. Anesiadou, Y. He, Requiem on the positive effects of commercial adaptive cruise control on motorway traffic and recommendations for future automated driving systems, Transport. Res. C-Emer., 130 (2021), 103305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103305 doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103305
|
| [20] |
C. Zhai, K. Li, R. Zhang, T. Peng, C. Zong, Phase diagram in multi-phase heterogeneous traffic flow model integrating the perceptual range difference under human-driven and connected vehicles environment, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 182 (2024), 114791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.114791 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.114791
|
| [21] |
S. Jiao, L. Xue, Y. Li, J. Wu, A. Li, Nonlinear dynamics of taillight effect in mixed traffic flow driven by competing visual delay and V2X communication, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 208 (2026), 118152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2026.118152 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2026.118152
|
| [22] |
J. Sanchez, A. Valverde, J. Guirao, H. Chen, Mathematical modeling for the development of traffic based on the theory of system dynamics, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 27626–27642. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20231413 doi: 10.3934/math.20231413
|
| [23] |
J. Chen, Y. Wu, S. Huang, P. Wang, Multi-objective optimization for AGV energy efficient scheduling problem with customer satisfaction, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 20097–20124. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20231024 doi: 10.3934/math.20231024
|
| [24] |
M. Al-Thani, Z. Sheng, Y. Cao, Y. Yang, Traffic Transformer: transformer-based framework for temporal traffic accident prediction, AIMS Mathematics, 9 (2024), 12610–12629. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2024617 doi: 10.3934/math.2024617
|
| [25] | T. Vaiyapuri, M. Sivakumar, S. Shridevi, V. Parvathy, J. Ramesh, K. Syed, et al., An intelligent water drop algorithm with deep learning driven vehicle detection and classification, AIMS Mathematics, 9 (2024), 11352–11371. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2024557 |
| [26] | K. Tarmissi, H. Mengash, N. Negm, Y. Said, A. Al-Sharafi, Explainable artificial intelligence with fusion-based transfer learning on adverse weather conditions detection using complex data for autonomous vehicles, AIMS Mathematics, 9 (2024), 35678–35701. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20241693 |
| [27] |
D. Yan, J. Cheng, J. Gan, Y. Wang, A dynamic traffic assignment model for solving overlapping path issues and perfectly rational issues under stochastic time-varying conditions, AIMS Mathematics, 10 (2025), 30661–30682. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20251345 doi: 10.3934/math.20251345
|
| [28] |
W. Jin, On the equivalence between continuum and car-following models of traffic flow, Transport. Res. B-Meth., 93 (2016), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.08.007 doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2016.08.007
|
| [29] |
S. Göttlich, E. Iacomini, T. Jung, Properties of the LWR model with time delay, Netw. Heterog. Media, 16 (2021), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.3934/nhm.2020032 doi: 10.3934/nhm.2020032
|
| [30] |
R. Wilson, J. Ward, Car-following models: fifty years of linear stability analysis—a mathematical perspective, Transport. Plan. Techn., 34 (2011), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2011.530826 doi: 10.1080/03081060.2011.530826
|
| [31] | M. Treiber, A. Kesting, Traffic flow dynamics: data, models and simulation, Cham: Springer, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-93922-8 |
| [32] |
D. Helbing, Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems, Rev. Mod. Phys., 73 (2001), 1067–1141. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.73.1067 doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.73.1067
|