As an important tool for characterizing uncertain information, the precision and robustness of cloud model parameter estimation directly affect the reliability of knowledge representation. Existing backward cloud generation algorithms were mostly based on moment estimation or resampling strategies, being sensitive to outliers and unable to fully utilize distributional morphological information in data. This paper proposes a quantile regression-based method, which achieves robust joint estimation of the three numerical features—expected value, entropy, and hyper-entropy—by constructing optimized matching relationships between sample quantiles and theoretical quantiles of cloud models. This method leverages the semiparametric adaptability of quantile regression to distributional morphology and the outlier resistance of median estimation, obtaining consistent parameter estimates without strict distributional assumptions, with median estimation possessing a theoretical breakdown point of fifty percent. Theoretical analysis proves the strong consistency and asymptotic normality of estimators; simulation experiments demonstrate that compared with traditional moment estimation and resampling methods, this algorithm exhibits superior estimation accuracy, algorithmic stability, and comprehensive cloud distance indicators under scenarios including point contamination, scale inflation, and asymmetric tail contamination. This method provides a new statistical perspective and reliable tool for cloud model applications in complex data environments.
Citation: Weidong Rao, Peiyang Cai, Wenjuan Li, Hankun Guo. Quantile regression for cloud model parameter estimation: a robust approach to uncertainty quantification[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2026, 11(5): 12334-12359. doi: 10.3934/math.2026506
As an important tool for characterizing uncertain information, the precision and robustness of cloud model parameter estimation directly affect the reliability of knowledge representation. Existing backward cloud generation algorithms were mostly based on moment estimation or resampling strategies, being sensitive to outliers and unable to fully utilize distributional morphological information in data. This paper proposes a quantile regression-based method, which achieves robust joint estimation of the three numerical features—expected value, entropy, and hyper-entropy—by constructing optimized matching relationships between sample quantiles and theoretical quantiles of cloud models. This method leverages the semiparametric adaptability of quantile regression to distributional morphology and the outlier resistance of median estimation, obtaining consistent parameter estimates without strict distributional assumptions, with median estimation possessing a theoretical breakdown point of fifty percent. Theoretical analysis proves the strong consistency and asymptotic normality of estimators; simulation experiments demonstrate that compared with traditional moment estimation and resampling methods, this algorithm exhibits superior estimation accuracy, algorithmic stability, and comprehensive cloud distance indicators under scenarios including point contamination, scale inflation, and asymmetric tail contamination. This method provides a new statistical perspective and reliable tool for cloud model applications in complex data environments.
| [1] | D. Li, Y. Du, Artificial intelligence with uncertainty, 2 Eds., Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315366951 |
| [2] | J. Yang, G. Wang, X. Li, Multi-granularity similarity measure of cloud concept, In: Rough sets, Cham: Springer, 2016,318–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47160-0_29 |
| [3] | D. Li, H. Meng, X. Shi, Membership clouds and membership cloud generators (Chinese), Computer R. D., 32 (1995), 15–20. |
| [4] |
H. Liu, L. Wang, Z. Li, Y. Hu, Improving risk evaluation in fmea with cloud model and hierarchical topsis method, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 27 (2019), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2861719 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2861719
|
| [5] |
C. Xu, G. Wang, A novel cognitive transformation algorithm based on gaussian cloud model and its application in image segmentation, Numer. Algor., 76 (2017), 1039–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11075-017-0296-y doi: 10.1007/s11075-017-0296-y
|
| [6] |
Y. Song, C. Li, Z. Qi, Power load pattern extraction method based on cloud model and fuzzy clustering (Chinese), Power Syst. Technol., 38 (2014), 3378–3383. https://doi.org/10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2014.12.017 doi: 10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2014.12.017
|
| [7] |
Y. Liu, Z. Liu, S. Li, Y. Guo, Q. Liu, G. Wang, Cloud-cluster: an uncertainty clustering algorithm based on cloud model, Knowl.-Based Syst., 263 (2023), 110261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110261 doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110261
|
| [8] |
H. Wu, J. Zhen, J. Zhang, Urban rail transit operation safety evaluation based on an improved critic method and cloud model, J. Rail Transport Plan., 16 (2020), 100206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2020.100206 doi: 10.1016/j.jrtpm.2020.100206
|
| [9] |
H. Liang, X. Xie, X. Chen, Q. Li, W. He, Z. Yang, et al., Study on risk assessment of tunnel construction across mined-out region based on combined weight-two-dimensional cloud model, Sci. Rep., 15 (2025), 7233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90837-z doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90837-z
|
| [10] |
D. Wang, D. Liu, H. Ding, V. P. Singh, Y. Wang, X. Zeng, et al., A cloud model-based approach for water quality assessment, Environ. Res., 148 (2016), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.03.005 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.03.005
|
| [11] |
C. Lu, X. Zhao, M. Yu, S. Gao, Y. Guo, Y. Wang, Evaluation of the effectiveness of emergency medical rescue equipment system based on cloud model, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 269 (2026), 112120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2025.112120 doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.112120
|
| [12] |
D. Li, C. Liu, W. Gan, A new cognitive model: cloud model, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 24 (2009), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20340 doi: 10.1002/int.20340
|
| [13] |
C. Xu, G. Wang, Q. Zhang, A new multi-step backward cloud transformation algorithm based on normal cloud model, Fund. Inform., 133 (2014), 55–85. https://doi.org/10.3233/FI-2014-1062 doi: 10.3233/FI-2014-1062
|
| [14] | C. Liu, M. Feng, X. Dai, D. Li, A new algorithm of backward cloud (Chinese), Journal of System Simulation, 16 (2004), 2417–2420. |
| [15] | T. Wu, K. Qin, Image segmentation using cloud model and data field (Chinese), Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 25 (2012), 397–405. |
| [16] | D. Li, S. Wang, D. Li, Spatial data mining: theory and application, Berlin: Springer, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48538-5 |
| [17] |
R. Koenker, K. F. Hallock, Quantile regression, J. Econ. Perspect., 15 (2001), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.4.143 doi: 10.1257/jep.15.4.143
|
| [18] |
W. Rao, J. Li, H. Guo, Air quality assessment in beijing based on cloud model, Sci. Rep., 15 (2025), 21994. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-05751-1 doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05751-1
|
| [19] |
R. A. Fisher, The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems, Annals of Eugenics, 7 (1936), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02137.x doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02137.x
|
| [20] | R. Bhatt, Wireless indoor localization data set, UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2017. Available from: https://doi.org/10.24432/C51880. |
| [21] |
W. K. Newey, D. McFadden, Large sample estimation and hypothesis testing, Handbook of Econometrics, 4 (1994), 2111–2245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4412(05)80005-4 doi: 10.1016/S1573-4412(05)80005-4
|
| [22] |
R. R. Bahadur, A note on quantiles in large samples, Ann. Math. Stat., 37 (1966), 577–580. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177699450 doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177699450
|