In this study, we proposed a hybrid methodology combining Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) and Immersed Finite Element (IFE) methods to address transmission problems in complex geometries, with a focus on Helmholtz-type equations. The technique addressed the challenge of solving wave equations in domains with circular interfaces, where material properties differ across the interface. The hybrid model leverages the strengths of PINNs to enforce the governing physical equations and IFE to provide a coarse initial solution, which is then corrected by the neural network using a signed-distance function to the interface. This correction was trained on a combination of supervised loss from data, physics-informed residual predictions, and interface conditions. Numerical experiments demonstrated high precision of the proposed technique when compared with manufactured exact solutions, achieving low error levels in both subdomains. High-frequency tests at $ \omega = 100 $ further validated the method's accuracy and robustness across material configurations including normal and inverted contrast cases. Its mesh-free character provides flexibility and versatility for a wide range of transmission problems in computational physics, making it a promising method for solving interface-related issues in wave propagation.
Citation: Muhammad Azam, Dalal Alhwikem, Naseer Ullah. Hybrid PINN-IFE approach for solving transmission problems in circular interface domains[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2026, 11(4): 10226-10256. doi: 10.3934/math.2026423
In this study, we proposed a hybrid methodology combining Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) and Immersed Finite Element (IFE) methods to address transmission problems in complex geometries, with a focus on Helmholtz-type equations. The technique addressed the challenge of solving wave equations in domains with circular interfaces, where material properties differ across the interface. The hybrid model leverages the strengths of PINNs to enforce the governing physical equations and IFE to provide a coarse initial solution, which is then corrected by the neural network using a signed-distance function to the interface. This correction was trained on a combination of supervised loss from data, physics-informed residual predictions, and interface conditions. Numerical experiments demonstrated high precision of the proposed technique when compared with manufactured exact solutions, achieving low error levels in both subdomains. High-frequency tests at $ \omega = 100 $ further validated the method's accuracy and robustness across material configurations including normal and inverted contrast cases. Its mesh-free character provides flexibility and versatility for a wide range of transmission problems in computational physics, making it a promising method for solving interface-related issues in wave propagation.
| [1] |
A. S. Bonnet-Ben Dhia, P. Ciarlet, C. M. Zwölf, Time harmonic wave diffraction problems in materials with sign-shifting coefficients, J. Comput. Appl. Math, 234 (2010), 1912–1919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2009.08.041 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2009.08.041
|
| [2] |
F. -O. Speck, Sommerfeld Diffraction Problems with First and Second Kind Boundary Conditions, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 20 (1989), 396–407. https://doi.org/10.1137/0520026 doi: 10.1137/0520026
|
| [3] |
S. N. Chandler-Wilde, B. Zhang, Scattering of Electromagnetic Waves by Rough Interfaces and Inhomogeneous Layers, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 30 (1999), 559–583. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036141097328932 doi: 10.1137/S0036141097328932
|
| [4] |
P. S. Christiansen, S. Krenk, A recursive finite element technique for acoustic fields in pipes with absorption, J. Sound. Vib., 122 (1988), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(88)80009-9 doi: 10.1016/S0022-460X(88)80009-9
|
| [5] |
B. Klenow, A. Nisewonger, R. C. Batra, A. Brown, Reflection and transmission of plane waves at an interface between two fluids, Comput. Fluids, 36 (2007), 1298–1306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2007.03.014 doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2007.03.014
|
| [6] |
Z. Zou, W. Aquino, I. Harari, Nitsche's method for Helmholtz problems with embedded interfaces, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng, 110 (2016), 618–636. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.5369 doi: 10.1002/nme.5369
|
| [7] |
J. Zhang, Wave propagation across fluid-solid interfaces: A grid method approach, Geophys. J. Int., 159 (2004), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02372 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02372
|
| [8] |
D. L. Brown, A Note on the Numerical Solution of the Wave Equation With Piecewise Smooth Coefficients, Math. Comput., 42 (1984), 369. https://doi.org/10.2307/2007591 doi: 10.2307/2007591
|
| [9] |
H. Kreiss, N. A. Petersson, An Embedded Boundary Method for the Wave Equation with Discontinuous Coefficients, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 28 (2006), 2054–2074. https://doi.org/10.1137/050641399 doi: 10.1137/050641399
|
| [10] |
A. K. Aziz, A. Werschulz, On the Numerical Solutions of Helmholtz's Equation by the Finite Element Method, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 17 (1980), 681–686. https://doi.org/10.1137/0717058 doi: 10.1137/0717058
|
| [11] |
I. M. Babuška, S. A. Sauter, Is the Pollution Effect of the FEM Avoidable for the Helmholtz Equation Considering High Wave Numbers? SIAM J. Numer. Anal, 34 (1997), 2392–2423. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036142994269186 doi: 10.1137/S0036142994269186
|
| [12] |
J. Douglas, D. Sheen, J. E. Santos, Approximation of scalar waves in the space-frequency domain, Math Models Methods Appl. Sci., 4 (1994), 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202594000297 doi: 10.1142/S0218202594000297
|
| [13] |
F. Ihlenburg, I. Babuška, Finite element solution of the Helmholtz equation with high wave number Part Ⅰ: The h-version of the FEM, Comput. Math. Appl., 30 (1995), 9–37. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021820259400028 doi: 10.1142/S021820259400028
|
| [14] |
E. Burman, H. Wu, L. Zhu, Linear continuous interior penalty finite element method for Helmholtz equation With High Wave Number: One-Dimensional Analysis, Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ, 32 (2016), 1378–1410. https://doi.org/10.1002/num.2205 doi: 10.1002/num.2205
|
| [15] |
Y. Du, H. Wu, Preasymptotic Error Analysis of Higher Order FEM and CIP-FEM for Helmholtz Equation with High Wave Number, SIAM J. Numer. Anal, 53 (2015), 782–804. https://doi.org/10.1137/14095312 doi: 10.1137/14095312
|
| [16] |
C. Farhat, I. Harari, U. Hetmaniuk, A discontinuous Galerkin method with Lagrange multipliers for the solution of Helmholtz problems in the mid-frequency regime, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 192 (2003), 1389–1419. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(02)00646-1 doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(02)00646-1
|
| [17] |
X. Feng, H. Wu, Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for the Helmholtz Equation with Large Wave Number, SIAM J. Numer. Anal, 47 (2009), 2872–2896. https://doi.org/10.1137/080737538 doi: 10.1137/080737538
|
| [18] |
C. J. Gittelson, R. Hiptmair, I. Perugia, Plane wave discontinuous Galerkin methods: Analysis of the h -version, ESAIM, 43 (2009), 297–331. https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/2009002 doi: 10.1051/m2an/2009002
|
| [19] |
C. Y. Lam, C.-W. Shu, A phase-based interior penalty discontinuous Galerkin method for the Helmholtz equation with spatially varying wavenumber, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng, 318 (2017), 456–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.01.032 doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2017.01.032
|
| [20] |
J. M. Melenk, A. Parsania, S. Sauter, General DG-Methods for Highly Indefinite Helmholtz Problems, J. Sci. Comput., 57 (2013), 536–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-013-9726-8 doi: 10.1007/s10915-013-9726-8
|
| [21] |
N. Moës, J. Dolbow, T. Belytschko, A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 46 (1999), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1<131::AID-NME726>3.0.CO;2-J doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990910)46:1<131::AID-NME726>3.0.CO;2-J
|
| [22] |
J. W. BARRETT, C. M. ELLIOTT, Fitted and Unfitted Finite-Element Methods for Elliptic Equations with Smooth Interfaces, IMA J. Numer. Anal., 7 (1987), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/imanum/7.3.283 doi: 10.1093/imanum/7.3.283
|
| [23] |
T. Y. Hou, X.-H. Wu, A Multiscale Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems in Composite Materials and Porous Media, J. Comput. Phys, 134 (1997), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1997.5682 doi: 10.1006/jcph.1997.5682
|
| [24] |
R. J. LeVeque, Z. Li, The Immersed Interface Method for Elliptic Equations with Discontinuous Coefficients and Singular Sources, SIAM J. Numer. Anal, 31 (1994), 1019–1044. https://doi.org/10.1137/0731054 doi: 10.1137/0731054
|
| [25] | Z. Li, K. Ito, The Immersed Interface Method: Numerical Solutions of PDEs Involving Interfaces and Irregular Domains, United States of America: SIAM, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9780898717464 |
| [26] | D. Braess, Finite Elements: Theory, Fast Solvers, and Applications in Solid Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618635 |
| [27] |
Z. Li, T. Lin, Y. Lin, R. C. Rogers, An immersed finite element space and its approximation capability, Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ, 20 (2004), 338–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/num.10092 doi: 10.1002/num.10092
|
| [28] |
Z. Li, T. Lin, X. Wu, New Cartesian grid methods for interface problems using the finite element formulation, Numer. Math. (Heidelb), 96 (2003), 61–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00211-003-0473-x doi: 10.1007/s00211-003-0473-x
|
| [29] |
S. A. Sauter, R. Warnke, Composite Finite Elements for Elliptic Boundary Value Problems with Discontinuous Coefficients, Computing, 77 (2006), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-005-0150-2 doi: 10.1007/s00607-005-0150-2
|
| [30] | X. He, T. Lin, Y. Lin, Approximation capability of a bilinear immersed finite element space, Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ, 24 (2008), 1265–1300. https://doi.org/0.1002/num.20318 |
| [31] |
X. He, T. Lin, Y. Lin, The convergence of the bilinear and linear immersed finite element solutions to interface problems, Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ, 28 (2012), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/num.20620 doi: 10.1002/num.20620
|
| [32] |
X. He, T. Lin, Y. Lin, Interior penalty bilinear IFE discontinuous Galerkin methods for elliptic equations with discontinuous coefficient, J. Syst. Sci. Complex, 23 (2012), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-010-0141-z doi: 10.1007/s11424-010-0141-z
|
| [33] |
X. He, T. Lin, Y. Lin, A selective immersed discontinuous Galerkin method for elliptic interface problems, Math. Methods Appl. Sci, 37 (2014), 983–1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.2856 doi: 10.1002/mma.2856
|
| [34] |
T. Lin, Y. Lin, X. Zhang, Partially Penalized Immersed Finite Element Methods For Elliptic Interface Problems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal, 53 (2015), 1121–1144. https://doi.org/10.1137/130912700 doi: 10.1137/130912700
|
| [35] |
T. Lin, Q. Yang, X. Zhang, A Priori Error Estimates for Some Discontinuous Galerkin Immersed Finite Element Methods, J. Sci. Comput, 65 (2015), 875–894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-015-9989-3 doi: 10.1007/s10915-015-9989-3
|
| [36] |
S. Adjerid, M. Ben-Romdhane, T. Lin, Higher degree immersed finite element spaces constructed according to the actual interface, Comput. Math. Appl., 75 (2018), 1868–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2017.10.010 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2017.10.010
|
| [37] |
M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, G. E. Karniadakis, Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations, J. Comput. Phys, 378 (2019), 686–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045
|
| [38] |
S. Wang, Y. Teng, P. Perdikaris, Understanding and Mitigating Gradient Flow Pathologies in Physics-Informed Neural Networks, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 43 (2021), A3055–A3081. https://doi.org/10.1137/20M1318043 doi: 10.1137/20M1318043
|
| [39] |
Z. Dong, C. Su, H. Chen, W. Lin, Y. Li, Agent-Physics-Informed Neural Network solving frequency-domain Helmholtz equation related forward and inverse problems, Wave Motion, 139 (2025), 103580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wavemoti.2025.103580 doi: 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2025.103580
|
| [40] |
A. Lin, Z. Zhang, W. Zhao, W. Zhao, Discontinuous extreme learning machine for interface and free boundary problems, J. Comput. Phys, 541 (2015), 114329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2025.114329 doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2025.114329
|
| [41] |
J. D. Toscano, V. Oommen, A. J. Varghese, Z. Zou, N. A. Daryakenari, C. Wu, et al., From PINNs to PIKANs: Recent advances in physics-informed machine learning, Mach. Learn. Comput. Sci. Eng., 1 (2025), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44379-025-00015-1 doi: 10.1007/s44379-025-00015-1
|
| [42] | J. S. M. N. Edgar Torres, Adaptive Physics-informed Neural Networks: A Survey, 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.18181 |
| [43] |
T. Yang, Z. Qian, N. Hang, M. Liu, S-PINN: Stabilized physics-informed neural networks for alleviating barriers between multi-level co-optimization, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng, 447 (2025), 118348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2025.118348 doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2025.118348
|
| [44] |
F. Wang, S. Rehman, M. Hussain Shah, M. Anass El Yamani, S. Farooq, A. Farooq, Numerical computation of Cross nanofluid model using neural network and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference system with statistical insights for enhanced flow optimization, Expert Syst. Appl., 263 (2025), 125721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125721 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125721
|
| [45] |
F. Ihlenburg, I. Babuska, Finite Element Solution of the Helmholtz Equation with High Wave Number Part Ⅱ: The h-p Version of the FEM, SIAM J. Numer. Anal, 34 (1997), 315–358. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036142994272337 doi: 10.1137/S0036142994272337
|