The twin extreme learning machine (TELM), based on the hinge-loss function, demonstrates significant potential for pattern classification tasks. However, the hinge-loss function, which minimizes the shortest distance between sets, results in classifiers that are sensitive to noise and unstable in the presence of overfitting. To enhance TELM's performance, a novel learning framework, termed adaptive fractional loss TELM (AFTELM), is proposed. This framework incorporates an adaptive fractional loss (AF-loss) function, offering improved robustness to noise compared to TELM with hinge loss. A theoretical analysis is provided to examine the noise insensitivity of AFTELM. The concave-convex procedure (CCCP) is employed for efficient optimization. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets validate the superior performance of AFTELM, demonstrating its robustness to noise and enhanced classification ability.
Citation: Xiang Jin, Guolin Yu, Jun Ma. Robust twin extreme learning machine with adaptive fractional loss[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2026, 11(4): 9228-9259. doi: 10.3934/math.2026381
The twin extreme learning machine (TELM), based on the hinge-loss function, demonstrates significant potential for pattern classification tasks. However, the hinge-loss function, which minimizes the shortest distance between sets, results in classifiers that are sensitive to noise and unstable in the presence of overfitting. To enhance TELM's performance, a novel learning framework, termed adaptive fractional loss TELM (AFTELM), is proposed. This framework incorporates an adaptive fractional loss (AF-loss) function, offering improved robustness to noise compared to TELM with hinge loss. A theoretical analysis is provided to examine the noise insensitivity of AFTELM. The concave-convex procedure (CCCP) is employed for efficient optimization. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets validate the superior performance of AFTELM, demonstrating its robustness to noise and enhanced classification ability.
| [1] |
Y. Liu, A nonfunctional data transformation approach via kurtosis adjustment and its application to SVM classification, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 2294 (2022), 012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2294/1/012024 doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2294/1/012024
|
| [2] |
X. J. Peng, D. Xu, Twin support vector hypersphere (TSVH) classifier for pattern recognition, Neural Comput. Applic., 24 (2014), 1207–1220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-1306-6 doi: 10.1007/s00521-012-1306-6
|
| [3] |
M. A. Chandra, S. S. Bedi, Survey on SVM and their application in image classification, Int. J. Inf. Technol., 13 (2021), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-017-0080-1 doi: 10.1007/s41870-017-0080-1
|
| [4] | P. Zitha, B. A. Thango, On the study of induction motor fault identification using support vector machine algorithms, 2023 31st Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference (SAUPEC), Johannesburg, South Africa, 2023, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAUPEC57889.2023.10057836 |
| [5] |
Z. Q. Qi, Y. J. Tian, Y. Shi, Robust twin support vector machine for pattern classification, Pattern Recogn., 46 (2013), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2012.06.019 doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2012.06.019
|
| [6] | T. Chakraborty, U. Kumar, Loss function, In: Encyclopedia of mathematical geosciences, Cham: Springer, 2022, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26050-7_187-1 |
| [7] |
W. Panup, W. Ratipapongton, R. Wangkeeree, A novel twin support vector machine with generalized pinball loss function for pattern classification, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14020289 doi: 10.3390/sym14020289
|
| [8] |
M. Tanveer, A. Sharma, P. N. Suganthan, General twin support vector machine with pinball loss function, Inform. Sciences, 494 (2019), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.04.032 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.04.032
|
| [9] |
J. M. Shen, J. Ma, Sparse twin extreme learning machine with $\varepsilon$-insensitive zone pinball loss, IEEE Access, 7 (2019), 112067–112078. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2935008 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2935008
|
| [10] |
T. Jiang, B. Wei, G. L. Yu, J. Ma, Generalized adaptive huber loss driven robust twin support vector machine learning framework for pattern classification, Neural Process. Lett., 57 (2025), 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-025-11783-5 doi: 10.1007/s11063-025-11783-5
|
| [11] |
Y. H. Shao, C. H. Zhang, X. B. Wang, N. Y. Deng, Improvements on twin support vector machines, IEEE T. Neural Networ., 22 (2011), 962–968. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2011.2130540 doi: 10.1109/TNN.2011.2130540
|
| [12] |
B. Parashjyoti, D. Gupta, Robust twin bounded support vector machines for outliers and imbalanced data, Appl. Intell., 51 (2021), 5314–5343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-01847-5 doi: 10.1007/s10489-020-01847-5
|
| [13] |
H. Y. Wang, G. L. Yu, J. Ma, Capped L2, p-norm metric based on robust twin support vector machine with welsch loss, Symmetry, 15 (2023), 1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15051076 doi: 10.3390/sym15051076
|
| [14] |
J. Wang, S. Y. Lu, S. H. Wang, Y. D. Zhang, A review on extreme learning machine, Multimed. Tools Appl., 81 (2022), 41611–41660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-021-11007-7 doi: 10.1007/s11042-021-11007-7
|
| [15] |
C. W. Deng, G. B. Huang, J. Xu, J. X. Tang, Extreme learning machines: New trends and applications, Sci. China Inf. Sci., 58 (2015), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-014-5269-3 doi: 10.1007/s11432-014-5269-3
|
| [16] |
G. A. Barreto, A. L. B. P. Barros, A robust extreme learning machine for pattern classification with outliers, Neurocomputing, 176 (2016), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2014.10.095 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2014.10.095
|
| [17] |
Y. H. Wan, S. J. Song, G. Huang, S. Li, Twin extreme learning machines for pattern classification, Neurocomputing, 260 (2017), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.04.036 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.04.036
|
| [18] |
Y. Yang, Z. X. Xue, J. Ma, X. Chang, Robust projection twin extreme learning machines with capped L1-norm distance metric, Neurocomputing, 517 (2023), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2022.09.156 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.09.156
|
| [19] |
X. B. Chen, J. Yang, Q. L. Ye, J. Liang, Recursive projection twin support vector machine via within-class variance minimization, Pattern Recogn., 44 (2011), 2643–2655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2011.03.001 doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2011.03.001
|
| [20] |
Z. X. Xue, Y. Wang, Y. W. Ren, X. Y. Zhang, The robust supervised learning framework: Harmonious integration of twin extreme learning machine, squared fractional loss, capped L2, p-norm metric, and Fisher regularization, Symmetry, 16 (2024), 1230. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16091230 doi: 10.3390/sym16091230
|
| [21] |
Z. X. Xue, L. C. Cai, Robust Fisher-regularized twin extreme learning machine with capped L1-norm for classification, Axioms, 12 (2023), 717. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12070717 doi: 10.3390/axioms12070717
|
| [22] |
C. Yuan, L. M. Yang, Robust twin extreme learning machines with correntropy-based metric, Knowl.-Based Syst., 214 (2021), 106707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106707 doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106707
|
| [23] |
S. Li, S. J. Song, Y. H. Wan, Laplacian twin extreme learning machine for semi-supervised classification, Neurocomputing, 321 (2018), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.08.028 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.08.028
|
| [24] |
J. Ma, G. L. Yu, Lagrangian regularized twin extreme learning machine for supervised and semi-supervised classification, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 1186. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14061186 doi: 10.3390/sym14061186
|
| [25] |
Z. Q. Qi, Y. J. Tian, Y. Shi, Twin support vector machine with universum data, Neural Networks, 36 (2012), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2012.09.004 doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2012.09.004
|
| [26] |
S. Akhter, J. H. Miller, BPAGS: A web application for bacteriocin prediction via feature evaluation using alternating decision tree, genetic algorithm, and linear support vector classifier, Front. Bioinform., 3 (2024), 1284705. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbinf.2023.1284705 doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2023.1284705
|
| [27] |
A. L. Yuille, A. Rangarajan, The concave-convex procedure, Neural Comput., 15 (2003), 915–936. https://doi.org/10.1162/08997660360581958 doi: 10.1162/08997660360581958
|