This work investigated the computational efficiency of primal-dual interior-point methods for nonlinear convex optimization by refining both the underlying kernel functions and the barrier parameter update mechanisms. We introduced a unified parametric class of self-regular kernels that generalizes several established barrier families while maintaining optimal theoretical iteration complexity. To bridge the gap between theoretical convergence and practical performance, we proposed an adaptive update rule for the barrier parameter and evaluated various heuristics for its dynamic selection. Extensive numerical testing on a diverse benchmark suite demonstrated that the proposed framework significantly outperforms the Interior Point OPTimizer (IPOPT) solver while maintaining high numerical accuracy and minimal stationarity residuals. Moreover, the framework exhibited robust performance even on nonconvex problems, highlighting its practical versatility beyond the theoretical convex setting.
Citation: Mounia Laouar, Mahmoud Brahimi, Raouf Ziadi, Mohammed A. Saleh, Abdulgader Z. Almaymuni, Benmessaoud Chahinez. A generalized self-regular Kernel function for large-scale nonlinear optimization problems[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2026, 11(2): 4935-4965. doi: 10.3934/math.2026202
This work investigated the computational efficiency of primal-dual interior-point methods for nonlinear convex optimization by refining both the underlying kernel functions and the barrier parameter update mechanisms. We introduced a unified parametric class of self-regular kernels that generalizes several established barrier families while maintaining optimal theoretical iteration complexity. To bridge the gap between theoretical convergence and practical performance, we proposed an adaptive update rule for the barrier parameter and evaluated various heuristics for its dynamic selection. Extensive numerical testing on a diverse benchmark suite demonstrated that the proposed framework significantly outperforms the Interior Point OPTimizer (IPOPT) solver while maintaining high numerical accuracy and minimal stationarity residuals. Moreover, the framework exhibited robust performance even on nonconvex problems, highlighting its practical versatility beyond the theoretical convex setting.
| [1] |
Y. Q. Bai, C. Roos, M. El Ghami, A primal-dual interior-point method for linear optimization based on a new proximity function, Optim. Method. Softw., 17 (2002), 985–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/1055678021000090024 doi: 10.1080/1055678021000090024
|
| [2] |
Y. Q. Bai, M. El Ghami, C. Roos, A new efficient large-update primal-dual interior-point method based on a finite barrier, SIAM J. Optimiz., 13 (2002), 766–782. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623401398132 doi: 10.1137/S1052623401398132
|
| [3] |
Y. Q. Bai, C. Roos, A polynomial-time algorithm for linear optimization based on a new simple kernel function, Optim. Methods Softw., 18 (2003), 631–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/10556780310001639735 doi: 10.1080/10556780310001639735
|
| [4] |
Y. Q. Bai, M. El Ghami, C. Roos, A comparative study of kernel functions for primal-dual interior-point algorithms in linear optimization, SIAM J. Optim., 15 (2004), 101–128. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623403423114 doi: 10.1137/S1052623403423114
|
| [5] |
B. Bounibane, El. A. Djeffal, Kernel function-based interior-point algorithms for linear optimisation, Int. J. Math. Model. Numer. Optim., 9 (2019), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMMNO.2019.098785 doi: 10.1504/IJMMNO.2019.098785
|
| [6] | S. Boyd, L. Vandenberghe, Convex optimization, Cambridge University Press, 2004. |
| [7] |
R. H. Byrd, M. E. Hribar, J. Nocedal, A trust region method based on interior point techniques for nonlinear programming, Math. Program., 89 (2000), 149–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00011391 doi: 10.1007/PL00011391
|
| [8] |
X. Z. Cai, G. Q. Wang, M. El Ghami, Y. J. Yue, Complexity analysis of primal-dual interior-point methods for linear optimization based on a new parametric kernel function with a trigonometric barrier term, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2014 (2014), 710158. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/710158 doi: 10.1155/2014/710158
|
| [9] |
R. Chalekh, El. A. Djeffal, Complexity analysis of an interior-point algorithm for CQP based on a new parametric kernel function, Stat. Opt. Inf. Comput., 12 (2024), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.19139/soic-2310-5070-1761 doi: 10.19139/soic-2310-5070-1761
|
| [10] |
E. Djeffal, M. Laouar, A primal-dual interior-point method based on a new kernel function for linear complementarity problem, Asian-Eur. J. Math., 12 (2019), 1950101. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793557120500011 doi: 10.1142/S1793557120500011
|
| [11] |
E. D. Dolan, J. J. Moré, Benchmarking optimization software with performance profiles, Math. Program., 91 (2002), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101070100263 doi: 10.1007/s101070100263
|
| [12] |
B. El-Sobky, G. Ashry, An interior-point trust-region algorithm to solve a nonlinear bilevel programming problem, AIMS Math., 7 (2022), 5534–5562. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022307 doi: 10.3934/math.2022307
|
| [13] |
M. Laouar, M. Brahimi, I. E. Lakhdari, Kernel function with BFGS quasi-Newton methods for solving nonlinear semi-definite problems, J. Math. Comput. Sci., 33 (2023), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22436/jmcs.033.01.01 doi: 10.22436/jmcs.033.01.01
|
| [14] |
S. H. Low, Convex relaxation of optimal power flow, Part Ⅰ: Formulations and equivalence, IEEE Trans. Control. Netw. Syst., 1 (2014), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCNS.2014.2309732 doi: 10.1109/TCNS.2014.2309732
|
| [15] |
S. Mehrotra, On the implementation of a primal-dual interior point method, SIAM J. Optim., 2 (1992), 575–601. https://doi.org/10.1137/0802028 doi: 10.1137/0802028
|
| [16] | Y. Nesterov, A. Nemirovskii, Interior-point polynomial algorithms in convex programming, Society for industrial and applied mathematics, 1994. |
| [17] | J. Nocedal, S. J. Wright, Numerical optimization, New York: Springer, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-40065-5 |
| [18] |
J. Peng, C. Roos, T. Terlaky, Self-regular functions and new search directions for linear and semidefinite optimization, Math. Program., 93 (2002), 129–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101070200296 doi: 10.1007/s101070200296
|
| [19] | J. Peng, C. Roos, T. Terlaky, Self-regularity: A new paradigm for primal-dual interior-point algorithms, Princeton University Press, 2009. |
| [20] |
C. Roos, A full-Newton step O(n) infeasible interior-point algorithm for linear optimization, SIAM J. Optim., 16 (2006), 1110–1136. https://doi.org/10.1137/050623917 doi: 10.1137/050623917
|
| [21] |
A. Q. Tian, F. F. Liu, H. X. Lv, Snow Geese algorithm: A novel migration-inspired meta-heuristic algorithm for constrained engineering optimization problems, Appl. Math. Model., 126 (2024), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2023.10.045 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2023.10.045
|
| [22] |
A. Q. Tian, J. S. Pan, H. X. Lv, Optimizing train scheduling in Heavy-Haul railways using diversified cooperative deep reinforcement learning, Transp. Res. Rec., 2680 (2025), 286–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981251364832 doi: 10.1177/03611981251364832
|
| [23] |
A. Wächter, L. T. Biegler, On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming, Math. Program., 106 (2006), 25–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-004-0559-y doi: 10.1007/s10107-004-0559-y
|
| [24] |
G. Wang, Y. Bai, Polynomial interior-point algorithm for $P_*(K)$ horizontal linear complementarity problem, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 233 (2009), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2009.07.014 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2009.07.014
|
| [25] | S. J. Wright, Primal-dual interior-point methods, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1997. |