Online information spreading depends on individual judgment, strategy choice, and network structure. Here, we used the eco-evolutionary snowdrift game of Lv et al. and assigned the benefit $ b $, cost $ c $, and environmental pressure $ Q $ interpretations suited to effective information dissemination. The selected attracting ecological densities of cooperators and defectors were mapped to the exit rates of spreaders and information holders; in a multistable region, this selection may depend on the game parameters and initial state. This provided an IHSCR delay model with information-ignorant individuals, beneficiaries, spreaders, holders, and information-immune individuals. A survival-consistent delayed transition formulation preserved nonnegativity and yielded $ R_0(\tau) = e^{-\mu\tau}R_0(0) $, with the critical delay $ \tau_p = \mu^{-1}\ln R_0(0) $ when $ R_0(0) > 1 $. The information-free equilibrium was globally asymptotically stable for $ R_0(\tau)\leq1 $, and no delay-induced imaginary-axis crossing occurred for the positive equilibrium on its existence interval. We also formulated a joint optimal-control problem for the spreader–holder transition channels. A larger cooperative ecological density raised $ \lambda_C $ and shortened the recurrent active cycle; the resulting decrease in $ R_0 $ does not imply a negative social effect of cooperation. Numerical simulations illustrated the threshold and showed that, in the tested settings, longer delays weaken finite-horizon control performance. Joint control gives the largest net objective among the tested strategies, while sensitivity tests across six scenarios support the dominance of $ u_1 $ under the stated control bounds and cost weights.
Citation: Xinwen Zhang, Rongyu Zhang, Xuechao Zhang. Dynamic analysis and optimal control of an ecological snowdrift game-coupled delayed information dissemination model considering information beneficiaries and retention behavior[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2026, 11(9): 32245-32287. doi: 10.3934/math.20261268
Online information spreading depends on individual judgment, strategy choice, and network structure. Here, we used the eco-evolutionary snowdrift game of Lv et al. and assigned the benefit $ b $, cost $ c $, and environmental pressure $ Q $ interpretations suited to effective information dissemination. The selected attracting ecological densities of cooperators and defectors were mapped to the exit rates of spreaders and information holders; in a multistable region, this selection may depend on the game parameters and initial state. This provided an IHSCR delay model with information-ignorant individuals, beneficiaries, spreaders, holders, and information-immune individuals. A survival-consistent delayed transition formulation preserved nonnegativity and yielded $ R_0(\tau) = e^{-\mu\tau}R_0(0) $, with the critical delay $ \tau_p = \mu^{-1}\ln R_0(0) $ when $ R_0(0) > 1 $. The information-free equilibrium was globally asymptotically stable for $ R_0(\tau)\leq1 $, and no delay-induced imaginary-axis crossing occurred for the positive equilibrium on its existence interval. We also formulated a joint optimal-control problem for the spreader–holder transition channels. A larger cooperative ecological density raised $ \lambda_C $ and shortened the recurrent active cycle; the resulting decrease in $ R_0 $ does not imply a negative social effect of cooperation. Numerical simulations illustrated the threshold and showed that, in the tested settings, longer delays weaken finite-horizon control performance. Joint control gives the largest net objective among the tested strategies, while sensitivity tests across six scenarios support the dominance of $ u_1 $ under the stated control bounds and cost weights.
| [1] |
X. X. Zhan, C. Liu, G. Zhou, Z. K. Zhang, G. Q. Sun, J. J. H. Zhu, et al., Coupling dynamics of epidemic spreading and information diffusion on complex networks, Appl. Math. Comput., 332 (2018), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2018.03.050 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2018.03.050
|
| [2] |
Q. Suo, J. L. Guo, A. Z. Shen, Information spreading dynamics in hypernetworks, Phys. A, 495 (2018), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.12.108 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.12.108
|
| [3] |
F. Yin, Y. Pan, X. Tang, C. Wu, Z. Jin, J. Wu, An information propagation network dynamic considering multi-platform influences, Appl. Math. Lett., 133 (2022), 108231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2022.108231 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2022.108231
|
| [4] |
F. Yin, J. Wang, X. Tang, X. Jiang, Y. Wu, J. Wu, Dynamics of information propagation and intervention in the multiplatform coupled networks, Expert Syst. Appl., 277 (2025), 127262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127262 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127262
|
| [5] |
K. K. King, B. Wang, Diffusion of real versus misinformation during a crisis event: a big data-driven approach, Int. J. Inf. Manage., 71 (2023), 102390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102390 doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102390
|
| [6] |
Y. Liu, B. Wang, B. Wu, S. Shang, Y. Zhang, C. Shi, Characterizing super-spreading in microblog: an epidemic-based information propagation model, Phys. A, 463 (2016), 202–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.07.022 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.07.022
|
| [7] |
F. Zhou, L. Lü, J. Liu, M. S. Mariani, Beyond network centrality: individual-level behavioral traits for predicting information superspreaders in social media, Natl. Sci. Rev., 11 (2024), nwae073. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwae073 doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwae073
|
| [8] |
D. J. Daley, D. G. Kendall, Epidemics and rumours, Nature, 204 (1964), 1118. https://doi.org/10.1038/2041118a0 doi: 10.1038/2041118a0
|
| [9] | D. P. Maki, M. Thompson, Mathematical models and applications: with emphasis on the social, life, and management sciences, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1973. |
| [10] |
L. Zhu, G. Guan, Z. Zhang, Mathematical analysis of information propagation model in complex networks, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 34 (2020), 2050240. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979220502409 doi: 10.1142/S0217979220502409
|
| [11] |
Z. Zhang, K. Zhu, F. Wang, Indirect information propagation model with time-delay effect on multiplex networks, Chaos Solitons Fract., 192 (2025), 115936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115936 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115936
|
| [12] |
X. Liu, T. Li, X. Cheng, W. Liu, H. Xu, Spreading dynamics of a preferential information model with hesitation psychology on scale-free networks, Adv. Difference Equ., 2019 (2019), 279. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-019-2221-2 doi: 10.1186/s13662-019-2221-2
|
| [13] |
J. Jia, Y. Huang, W. Zhang, Y. Chen, Information propagation characteristic by individual hesitant-common trend on weighted network, Front. Phys., 12 (2024), 1410089. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2024.1410089 doi: 10.3389/fphy.2024.1410089
|
| [14] |
G. Song, Y. Wang, Y. Li, Dynamic mathematical model of information spreading on news platform, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput., 2021 (2021), 2174190. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2174190 doi: 10.1155/2021/2174190
|
| [15] |
X. Zhang, Y. Hu, S. Lu, H. Guo, X. Wei, J. Li, Dynamic analysis and control of online information dissemination model considering information beneficiaries, AIMS Math., 10 (2025), 4992–5020. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2025229 doi: 10.3934/math.2025229
|
| [16] |
S. Kang, X. Hou, Y. Hu, H. Liu, Dynamic analysis and optimal control considering cross transmission and variation of information, Sci. Rep., 12 (2022), 18104. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21774-4 doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21774-4
|
| [17] |
M. Wang, Y. Hu, Dynamic analysis and control measures of rumor propagation model considering true individuals and public opinion individuals, Inf. Sci., 676 (2024), 120779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2024.120779 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2024.120779
|
| [18] |
H. Wang, S. Kang, Y. Hu, Dynamic analysis and optimal control of rumor propagation models considering different education levels and hesitation mechanisms, AIMS Math., 9 (2024), 20089–20117. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2024979 doi: 10.3934/math.2024979
|
| [19] |
Y. Li, M. Feng, L. J. Deng, M. Perc, J. Kurths, Digital epidemiology with awareness-based event-triggered migration in networked cyber-physical systems, IEEE Trans. Netw., 34 (2026), 4885–4898. https://doi.org/10.1109/TON.2026.3688173 doi: 10.1109/TON.2026.3688173
|
| [20] |
Y. Zhang, M. Feng, J. Kurths, A. Szolnoki, Evolutionary dynamics based on reputation in networked populations with game transitions, IEEE Trans. Signal Inf. Process. Netw., 11 (2025), 1557–1568. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSIPN.2025.3636748 doi: 10.1109/TSIPN.2025.3636748
|
| [21] |
C. Luo, Y. Zhang, M. Feng, A. Szolnoki, Evolutionary cooperation with game transitions via Markov decision chain in networked population, Appl. Math. Model., 154 (2026), 116710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2025.116710 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2025.116710
|
| [22] |
L. Ma, B. Li, J. Wang, Dynamic evolutionary analysis of opinion leaders' and netizens' uncertain information dissemination behavior considering random interference, Front. Phys., 12 (2024), 1387312. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2024.1387312 doi: 10.3389/fphy.2024.1387312
|
| [23] |
H. Wang, H. Huang, H. Liu, Competition or cooperation? Multiple information diffusion against epidemic spreading in a multiplex network, Chaos Solitons Fract., 203 (2026), 117585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117585 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117585
|
| [24] |
Y. Liu, S. M. Diao, Y. X. Zhu, Q. Liu, SHIR competitive information diffusion model for online social media, Phys. A, 461 (2016), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.06.080 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.06.080
|
| [25] |
X. Li, B. Hou, Competing complex information spreading in multiplex social network, Complexity, 2021 (2021), 9923837. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9923837 doi: 10.1155/2021/9923837
|
| [26] |
F. Bagarello, F. Gargano, F. Oliveri, Spreading of competing information in a network, Entropy, 22 (2020), 1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22101169 doi: 10.3390/e22101169
|
| [27] |
Y. Xiao, L. Zhang, Q. Li, L. Liu, MM-SIS: model for multiple information spreading in multiplex network, Phys. A, 513 (2019), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.08.169 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.08.169
|
| [28] |
S. Cui, X. Zhu, The information propagation mechanism of individual heterogeneous adoption behavior under the heterogeneous network, Front. Phys., 12 (2024), 1404464. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2024.1404464 doi: 10.3389/fphy.2024.1404464
|
| [29] |
R. Lv, H. Li, Q. Sun, Q. Gao, B. Li, Evolution of group behaviour in the ecological snowdrift game-level-headed and impatient delayed epidemic model under emergencies, Appl. Math. Comput., 509 (2026), 129668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2025.129668 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2025.129668
|
| [30] |
I. Eshel, L. L. Cavalli-Sforza, Assortment of encounters and evolution of cooperativeness, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 79 (1982), 1331–1335. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.79.4.1331 doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.4.1331
|
| [31] |
P. van den Driessche, J. Watmough, Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission, Math. Biosci., 180 (2002), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00108-6 doi: 10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00108-6
|
| [32] | S. Lenhart, J. T. Workman, Optimal control applied to biological models, Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420011418 |
| [33] | L. Cesari, Optimization–theory and applications: problems with ordinary differential equations, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8165-5 |
| [34] |
T. Guinn, Reduction of delayed optimal control problems to nondelayed problems, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 18 (1976), 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00933818 doi: 10.1007/BF00933818
|
| [35] |
L. Göllmann, D. Kern, H. Maurer, Optimal control problems with delays in state and control variables subject to mixed control-state constraints, Optim. Control Appl. Methods, 30 (2009), 341–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.843 doi: 10.1002/oca.843
|