Financial markets rarely operate under perfect rationality. Price expectations are formed and revised in environments shaped by limited information, behavioral biases, and institutional frictions. In such settings, investors' perceptions of differences between forecasts may deviate from purely rational benchmarks. In this paper, we develop a mathematical framework for expectation updating that captures these perceptual distortions in a perturbed-metric setting. We introduce a new contractive-type learning condition that simultaneously incorporates individual inertia and institutional adjustment frictions. Unlike classical contraction structures, the proposed condition reflects directional interactions and layered perception effects in the updating process. Under a natural stability requirement linking individual and institutional adjustment intensities, we establish the existence and uniqueness of an equilibrium price expectation and prove the convergence of the learning dynamics. Linear and nonlinear specifications illustrate how behavioral and institutional mechanisms jointly determine not only stability but also persistence and the speed of convergence.
Citation: Şeyma Bilazeroğlu. Fixed point analysis of expectation convergence in financial learning in perturbed metric spaces[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2026, 11(8): 25192-25228. doi: 10.3934/math.20261013
Financial markets rarely operate under perfect rationality. Price expectations are formed and revised in environments shaped by limited information, behavioral biases, and institutional frictions. In such settings, investors' perceptions of differences between forecasts may deviate from purely rational benchmarks. In this paper, we develop a mathematical framework for expectation updating that captures these perceptual distortions in a perturbed-metric setting. We introduce a new contractive-type learning condition that simultaneously incorporates individual inertia and institutional adjustment frictions. Unlike classical contraction structures, the proposed condition reflects directional interactions and layered perception effects in the updating process. Under a natural stability requirement linking individual and institutional adjustment intensities, we establish the existence and uniqueness of an equilibrium price expectation and prove the convergence of the learning dynamics. Linear and nonlinear specifications illustrate how behavioral and institutional mechanisms jointly determine not only stability but also persistence and the speed of convergence.
| [1] |
N. G. Mankiw, R. Reis, Sticky information versus sticky prices: A proposal to replace the new Keynesian Phillips curve, Q. J. Econ., 117 (2002), 1295–1328. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302320935034 doi: 10.1162/003355302320935034
|
| [2] |
C. A. Sims, Implications of rational inattention, J. Monetary Econ., 50 (2003), 665–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(03)00029-1 doi: 10.1016/S0304-3932(03)00029-1
|
| [3] | G. W. Evans, S. Honkapohja, Learning and expectations in macroeconomics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001. |
| [4] | L. P. Hansen, T. J. Sargent, Robustness, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007. |
| [5] |
A. Tversky, D. Kahneman, Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Science, 185 (1974), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
|
| [6] |
N. Barberis, A. Shleifer, R. Vishny, A model of investor sentiment, J. Financ. Econ., 49 (1998), 307–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00027-0 doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00027-0
|
| [7] |
H. A. Simon, A behavioral model of rational choice, Q. J. Econ., 69 (1955), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852 doi: 10.2307/1884852
|
| [8] | A. Shleifer, Inefficient markets: An introduction to behavioral finance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. |
| [9] | N. Barberis, R. H. Thaler, Behavioral finance, In: Handbook of the economics of finance, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2003, 1053–1128. |
| [10] | D. Hirshleifer, Behavioral finance, Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ., 7 (2015), 133–159. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-092214-043752 |
| [11] |
M. Jleli, B. Samet, On Banach's fixed point theorem in perturbed metric spaces, J. Appl. Anal. Comput., 15 (2025), 993–1001. https://doi.org/10.11948/20240242 doi: 10.11948/20240242
|
| [12] |
G. Alsahli, E. Karapınar, P. Shahi, On rational contractions in perturbed metric spaces, Res. Math., 12 (2025), 2508578. https://doi.org/10.1080/27684830.2025.2508578 doi: 10.1080/27684830.2025.2508578
|
| [13] |
G. Alsahli, P. Shahi, E. Karapınar, On perturbed-S$_\tau$ contractions, AIMS Mathematics, 10 (2025), 11976–11985. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2025541 doi: 10.3934/math.2025541
|
| [14] |
E. Karapınar, C. M. Păcurar, P. Shahi, Interpolative contractions on perturbed metric spaces, An. Univ. Ovidius Constanta Ser. Mat., 34 (2026), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.2478/auom-2026-0009 doi: 10.2478/auom-2026-0009
|
| [15] |
A. Moussaoui, N. Taş, New perturbed parametric metric spaces for distance modeling: Fixed-point analysis with applications to the fixed-circle problem, Fix. Point Theory Alg. Sci. Eng., 2026 (2026), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13663-026-00829-5 doi: 10.1186/s13663-026-00829-5
|
| [16] |
C. Yalçın, Perturbed statistical convergence, Results Nonlinear Anal., 8 (2025), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.31838/rna/2025.08.02.023 doi: 10.31838/rna/2025.08.02.023
|
| [17] | S. G. Georgiev, K. Zennir, Multiple fixed-point theorems and applications in the theory of ODEs, FDEs and PDEs, New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003028727 |
| [18] | E. Karapınar, R. P. Agarwal, Fixed point theory in generalized metric spaces, Cham: Springer, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14969-6 |
| [19] | K. Mebarki, S. G. Georgiev, S. Djebali, K. Zennir, Fixed point theorems with applications, New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003381969 |
| [20] |
Ş. Bilazeroglu, A behavioral perspective on price convergence via perturbed metric spaces with an extended contraction, Turk. J. Math. Comput. Sci., 18 (2026), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.47000/tjmcs.1761322 doi: 10.47000/tjmcs.1761322
|