Research article Special Issues

Analyzing runoff variability index in northern Thailand using length-biased Weibull-Rayleigh distribution

  • Published: 26 June 2025
  • MSC : 62E10, 62F10, 62P12

  • The runoff variability index evaluates the fluctuations in runoff levels. In this article, we outline a method for quantifying the runoff variability index using the length-biased Weibull-Rayleigh (LBWR) distribution and the selecting a suitable parameter estimation technique (the maximum likelihood estimators (MLE), method of moment (MOM), maximum product of spacings estimators (MPSE), Anderson-Darling minimum distance estimators (ADE), and Cramér-von Mises minimum distance estimators (CMVE) methods). Our simulations results indicated that most ADE methods showed enhanced efficiency compared to other estimation methods in terms of mean square error (MSE) and average relative bias (AvRB). This study represents the first investigation into the runoff variability index that integrates the LBWR distribution with ADE parameter estimation. Four stations were studied: Two in Nan province and two in Phrae province. The results indicated that Nan province experiences events more frequently than once every ten years, in contrast to Phrae province. Furthermore, the runoff variability index values are useful for classifying the runoff at the four study locations, which corresponds with the particular geographic conditions at each site. Local and regional authorities can use this runoff variability index values to formulate evidence-based water management strategies, improve flood preparedness, and support long-term water security. This directly contributes to the development of more sustainable and resilient infrastructure in the face of an increasingly variable climate.

    Citation: Tanachot Chaito, Manad Khamkong. Analyzing runoff variability index in northern Thailand using length-biased Weibull-Rayleigh distribution[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(6): 14539-14559. doi: 10.3934/math.2025655

    Related Papers:

  • The runoff variability index evaluates the fluctuations in runoff levels. In this article, we outline a method for quantifying the runoff variability index using the length-biased Weibull-Rayleigh (LBWR) distribution and the selecting a suitable parameter estimation technique (the maximum likelihood estimators (MLE), method of moment (MOM), maximum product of spacings estimators (MPSE), Anderson-Darling minimum distance estimators (ADE), and Cramér-von Mises minimum distance estimators (CMVE) methods). Our simulations results indicated that most ADE methods showed enhanced efficiency compared to other estimation methods in terms of mean square error (MSE) and average relative bias (AvRB). This study represents the first investigation into the runoff variability index that integrates the LBWR distribution with ADE parameter estimation. Four stations were studied: Two in Nan province and two in Phrae province. The results indicated that Nan province experiences events more frequently than once every ten years, in contrast to Phrae province. Furthermore, the runoff variability index values are useful for classifying the runoff at the four study locations, which corresponds with the particular geographic conditions at each site. Local and regional authorities can use this runoff variability index values to formulate evidence-based water management strategies, improve flood preparedness, and support long-term water security. This directly contributes to the development of more sustainable and resilient infrastructure in the face of an increasingly variable climate.



    加载中


    [1] D. Alford, Streamflow and sediment transport from mountain watersheds of the chao phraya basin, northern Thailand: a reconnaissance study, Mt. Res. Dev., 12 (1992), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.2307/3673669 doi: 10.2307/3673669
    [2] C. Hugenschmidt, J. Ingwersen, W. Sangchan, Y. Sukvanachaikul, A. Duffner, S. Uhlenbrook, et al., A three-component hydrograph separation based on geochemical tracers in a tropical mountainous headwater catchment in northern Thailand, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18 (2014), 525–537. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-525-2014 doi: 10.5194/hess-18-525-2014
    [3] A. D. Ziegler, R. A. Sutherland, T. W. Giambelluca, Runoff generation and sediment production on unpaved roads, footpaths and agricultural land surfaces in northern Thailand, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 25 (2000), 519–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(200005)25:5 < 519::AID-ESP80 > 3.0.CO; 2-T doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(200005)25:5 < 519::AID-ESP80 > 3.0.CO; 2-T
    [4] T. Piman, M. Babel, Prediction of rainfall-runoff in an ungauged basin: case study in the mountainous region of northern Thailand, J. Hydrol. Eng., 18 (2013), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000573 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000573
    [5] A. F. A. Tinumbang, K. Yorozu, Y. Tachikawa, Y. Ichikawa, H. Sasaki, T. Nakaegawa, Analysis of runoff characteristics generated by land surface models and their impacts on river discharge, J. Jpn. Soc. Civil Eng. Ser. B1 (Hydraul. Eng.), 75 (2019), 271–276. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejhe.75.2_I_271 doi: 10.2208/jscejhe.75.2_I_271
    [6] M. Khamkong, P. Bookkamana, Development of statistical models for maximum daily rainfall in upper northern region of Thailand, Chiang Mai J. Sci., 42 (2015), 1044–1053.
    [7] T. Chaito, M. Khamkong, P. Murnta, Appropriate transformation techniques to determine a modified standardized precipitation index for the Ping River in northern Thailand, EnvironmentAsia, 12 (2019), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.14456/ea.2019.43 doi: 10.14456/ea.2019.43
    [8] T. Chaito, M. Khamkong, The length-biased Weibull Rayleigh distribution for application to hydrological data, Lobachevskii J. Math., 42 (2021), 3253–3265. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995080222010218 doi: 10.1134/S1995080222010218
    [9] R Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria, 2025. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/fullrefman.pdf.
    [10] B. Ranneby, The maximum spacing method. An estimation method related to the maximum likelihood method, Scand. J. Stat., 11 (1984), 93–112.
    [11] R. C. H. Cheng, N. A. K. Amin, Estimating parameters in continuous univariate distributions with a shifted origin, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.), 45 (1983), 394–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1983.tb01268.x doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1983.tb01268.x
    [12] G. Salvadori, F. Durante, C. De Michele, M. Bernardi, L. Petrella, A multivariate copula-based framework for dealing with hazard scenarios and failure probabilities, Water Resour. Res., 52 (2016), 3701–3721. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017225 doi: 10.1002/2015WR017225
    [13] World Meteorological Organization (WMO), Drought and agriculture, WMO. TN138, Geneva, 1975. Available from: https://library.wmo.int/idurl/4/30669.
    [14] Upper Northern Region Irrigation Hydrology Center, Rainfall and runoff data, 2020. Available from: https://www.hydro-1.net/.
    [15] United Nations Department of Humanitarian Affairs (DHA), Thailand: Floods-Oct 1995, ReliefWeb, 1995. Available from: https://reliefweb.int/taxonomy/term/5389.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2025 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(589) PDF downloads(39) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)  /  Tables(10)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog