ϵ(τ) | S[ϵ(τ)]=F(s,ν) | |
1. | 1 | νs |
2. | τ | ν2s2 |
3. | τm,m∈N | ∠m(νs)m+1 |
4. | τm,m>−1 | Γ(m+1)(νs)m+1 |
5. | eaτ | νs−aν |
6. | sin(mτ) | mν2s2+m2ν2 |
7. | cos(mτ) | sν2s2+m2ν2 |
8. | sinh(mτ) | mν2s2−m2ν2 |
9. | cosh(mτ) | sν2s2−m2ν2 |
We investigated certain properties of cumulative entropy related to the lifetime of consecutive k-out-of-n:F systems. First, we presented a technique to compute the cumulative entropy of the lifetimes of these systems and studied their preservation properties using the established stochastic orders. Furthermore, we derived valuable bounds applicable in cases where the distribution function of component lifetimes is complex or when systems consist of numerous components. To facilitate practical applications, we introduced two nonparametric estimators for the cumulative entropy of these systems. The efficiency and reliability of these estimators were demonstrated using simulated analysis and subsequently validated using real data sets.
Citation: Mashael A. Alshehri, Mohamed Kayid. Cumulative entropy properties of consecutive systems[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 31770-31789. doi: 10.3934/math.20241527
[1] | Mohamed Adel, M. Elsaid Ramadan, Hijaz Ahmad, Thongchai Botmart . Correction: Sobolev-type nonlinear Hilfer fractional stochastic differential equations with noninstantaneous impulsive. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(4): 9185-9186. doi: 10.3934/math.2023460 |
[2] | Thabet Abdeljawad, Pshtiwan Othman Mohammed, Hari Mohan Srivastava, Eman Al-Sarairah, Artion Kashuri, Kamsing Nonlaopon . Some novel existence and uniqueness results for the Hilfer fractional integro-differential equations with non-instantaneous impulsive multi-point boundary conditions and their application. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 3469-3483. doi: 10.3934/math.2023177 |
[3] | Kui Liu . Stability analysis for (ω,c)-periodic non-instantaneous impulsive differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 1758-1774. doi: 10.3934/math.2022101 |
[4] | Weerawat Sudsutad, Wicharn Lewkeeratiyutkul, Chatthai Thaiprayoon, Jutarat Kongson . Existence and stability results for impulsive (k,ψ)-Hilfer fractional double integro-differential equation with mixed nonlocal conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 20437-20476. doi: 10.3934/math.20231042 |
[5] | Noorah Mshary, Hamdy M. Ahmed, Ahmed S. Ghanem . Existence and controllability of nonlinear evolution equation involving Hilfer fractional derivative with noise and impulsive effect via Rosenblatt process and Poisson jumps. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 9746-9769. doi: 10.3934/math.2024477 |
[6] | Kanagaraj Muthuselvan, Baskar Sundaravadivoo, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Suliman Alsaeed . Discussion on iterative process of nonlocal controllability exploration for Hilfer neutral impulsive fractional integro-differential equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 16846-16863. doi: 10.3934/math.2023861 |
[7] | M. Manjula, K. Kaliraj, Thongchai Botmart, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, C. Ravichandran . Existence, uniqueness and approximation of nonlocal fractional differential equation of sobolev type with impulses. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4645-4665. doi: 10.3934/math.2023229 |
[8] | Sunisa Theswan, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, Jessada Tariboon . Coupled systems of ψ-Hilfer generalized proportional fractional nonlocal mixed boundary value problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 22009-22036. doi: 10.3934/math.20231122 |
[9] | Rizwan Rizwan, Jung Rye Lee, Choonkil Park, Akbar Zada . Qualitative analysis of nonlinear impulse langevin equation with helfer fractional order derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 6204-6217. doi: 10.3934/math.2022345 |
[10] | Kulandhaivel Karthikeyan, Palanisamy Raja Sekar, Panjaiyan Karthikeyan, Anoop Kumar, Thongchai Botmart, Wajaree Weera . A study on controllability for Hilfer fractional differential equations with impulsive delay conditions. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4202-4219. doi: 10.3934/math.2023209 |
We investigated certain properties of cumulative entropy related to the lifetime of consecutive k-out-of-n:F systems. First, we presented a technique to compute the cumulative entropy of the lifetimes of these systems and studied their preservation properties using the established stochastic orders. Furthermore, we derived valuable bounds applicable in cases where the distribution function of component lifetimes is complex or when systems consist of numerous components. To facilitate practical applications, we introduced two nonparametric estimators for the cumulative entropy of these systems. The efficiency and reliability of these estimators were demonstrated using simulated analysis and subsequently validated using real data sets.
Fractional calculus is a modification of the notion of differentiation and integration of arbitrary orders [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. As there exist various prototypes in engineering and sciences, fractional calculus has attained the researcher's interest. Multiple models in numerous aspects such as; physics, biology, and engineering are tackled as per fractional differential and integral calculus. Some examples are electrochemistry, signal processing, diffusion, finance, acoustic, plasma physics, image processing, and others [8,9,10,11,12,13].
Integral transforms are notified as one of the most suitable approaches to tackle models regarding applied mathematics, mathematical physics, engineering, and some other branches as well. The primary motivation is to deal with the provided mathematical model via any suitable integral transform and to retrieve the associated outcome in the best possible approach.
Via an appropriate selection of integral transform, the differential and integral equations can be transformed into an algebraic equations system, which can be easily tackled.
Various integral transforms and integral transform-based approaches are generated and incorporated for this purpose, such as; Laplace transform [14], Sumudu transform [15], Elzaki transform [16], and Natural transform [17], and many others.
Definition 1: Shehu transform of the function θ(τ) is defined over the following functions [18,19,20].
A={ϵ(τ):thereexistsN,k1,k2>0s.t.|θ(τ)|<Nexp(|τ|ki),whereτ∈(−1)j×[0,∞)}. | (1) |
Definition 2: Shehu transform of function ϵ(τ) is defined as follows [18,19,20]:
S[ϵ(τ)]=F[s,u]=∫∞0exp[−sτu]ϵ(τ)dτ. | (2) |
Definition 3: Inverse Shehu transform is defined as follows [18,19,20]:
S−1[F(s,u)]=ϵ(τ). | (3) |
Where s, u are the Shehu transform variables. α∈R.
S[ϵ′(τ)]=suF[s,u]−ϵ(0), | (4) |
S[ϵ′′(τ)]=s2u2F(s,u)−suϵ(0)−ϵ′(0), | (5) |
S[ϵ′′′(τ)]=s3u3F[s,u]−s2u2ϵ(0)−suϵ′(0)−ϵ′′(0). | (6) |
Definition 5: Linearity property of Shehu transform [18,19,20]:
S[c1ϵ1(τ)+c2ϵ2(τ)]=c1S[ϵ1(τ)]+c2S[ϵ2(τ)]. | (7) |
Definition 6: Linearity property of inverse Shehu transform [18,19,20]:
If
ϵ1(τ)=S−1[F1(s,u)]andϵ2(τ)=S−1[F2(s,u)], |
then
S−1[c1F1(s,u)+c2F2(s,u)]=c1S−1[F1(s,u)]+c2S−1[F2(s,u)], |
S−1[c1F1(s,u)+c2F2(s,u)]=c1ϵ1(τ)+c2ϵ2(τ). |
Definition 7: Shehu transform of Caputo fractional derivative [C.F.D.] [20,21]:
S[Dαtϵ(μ,τ)]=sαναS[ϵ(μ,τ)]−∑θ−1r=0(sν)α−r−1ϵr(μ,0). | (8) |
Definition 8: Mittag-Leffler function considered for two parameters was given in [22,23,24].
Eμ,ν(n)=∑∞k=0nkΓ(kμ+ν). | (9) |
Where E1,1(n)=exp(n) and E2,1(n2)=cos(n).
In Tables 1 and 2 basic formulae regarding Shehu transform and inverse Shehu transform are provided.
ϵ(τ) | S[ϵ(τ)]=F(s,ν) | |
1. | 1 | νs |
2. | τ | ν2s2 |
3. | τm,m∈N | ∠m(νs)m+1 |
4. | τm,m>−1 | Γ(m+1)(νs)m+1 |
5. | eaτ | νs−aν |
6. | sin(mτ) | mν2s2+m2ν2 |
7. | cos(mτ) | sν2s2+m2ν2 |
8. | sinh(mτ) | mν2s2−m2ν2 |
9. | cosh(mτ) | sν2s2−m2ν2 |
F(s,ν) | ϵ(τ)=S−1[F(s,ν)] | |
1. | νs | 1 |
2. | ν2s2 | τ |
3. | (νs)m+1 | τm∠m |
4. | Γ(m+1)(νs)m+1 | τmΓ(m+1) |
5. | νs−aν | eaτ |
6. | mν2s2+m2ν2 | sin(mτ) |
7. | sν2s2+m2ν2 | cos(mτ) |
8. | mν2s2−m2ν2 | sinh(mτ) |
9. | sν2s2−m2ν2 | cosh(mτ) |
1D Non-linear time-fractional Schrödinger equation.
iDαtθ(μ,τ)=R[θ(μ,τ)]+N[θ(μ,τ)]+ϕ(μ,τ). | (10) |
2D Non-linear time-fractional Schrödinger equation.
iDαtθ(μ1,μ2,τ)=R[θ(μ1,μ2,τ)]+N[θ(μ1,μ2,τ)]+ϕ(μ1,μ2,τ). | (11) |
3D Non-linear time-fractional Schrödinger equation.
iDαtθ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=R[θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+N[θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+ϕ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ). | (12) |
One of the well-known models in mathematical physics is Schr¨odinger equation model. There exist various implementations in numerous branches, such as; non-linear optics [25], mean-field theory of Bose-Einstein condensates [26,27], and plasma physics [28]. One emerging aspect of quantum physics is considered as fractional Schr¨odinger equation; which is associated with the notion of non-local quantum phenomena.
Naber [29] notified time-fractional Schr¨odinger equation regarding Caputo derivative. Wang and Xu [30] elaborated on the linear Schr¨odinger equation regarding the space-fractional and time-fractional aspects as well as tackled the models via integral transform approach. Due to the existence of numerous implementations of the time-fractional Schr¨odinger equation; various researchers have worked in this field. Regarding this, novel analytical and numerical regimes have been generated for the time-fractional Schr¨odinger equation [31,32,33,34]. Hemida et al. [35] implemented HAM to provide the approximated results for the space-time fractional Schr¨odinger equation. More work related to fractional Schr¨odinger equation is provided in [36,37,38]. Other noteworthy work in this regard is notified as [39,40,41,42].
The main advantage of ADM is that it does not rely upon perturbation or linearization or any discretization. Therefore, the actual outcome of the model remains unchanged. Discretization of variables is not demanded, which is a difficult and challenging approach. It means that the obtained results are error-free, which occurred because of discretization. Furthermore, it is accurate in finding the approximated and exact solutions of the non-linear prototypes. Such methods can be implemented to the diversified differential equations such as; integro-differential equations, differential-algebraic equations, differential-difference equations, as well as some functional equations, eigenvalue problems, and Stochastic system problems.
The main idea of the present study is to concentrate on the implementation of Shehu ADM for attaining the exact solution to the Schr¨odinger equations in various dimensions. Some latest research regarding this field is provided on [43,44,45,46,47].
Novelty and significance of the paper
There are several schemes observed in the literature that deal with fractional Schr¨odinger equation in one, two, or three dimensions, but rare methods are provided that tackles fractional Schr¨odinger equation in all one, two, and three dimensions. Therefore, the authors have focused on developing a technique that proves the validity of the approximated-analytical solution of the mentioned equations in one, two, and three dimensions.
An iterative scheme is developed in the present research regarding the solution of fractional Schr¨odinger equation in one, two, and three dimensions. The present scheme is easy to implement and needs no complex programming regarding numerical discretization. Developing the numerical programs for the fractional PDEs is not an easy task; therefore, developing such iterative schemes is the need of time to find the approximated-analytical solutions. There exist several transforms provided in the literature, but from the calculation aspect, some transforms are easy to implement, and some are not. Shehu ADM is noticed as one of the easiest methods to implement integral transform among all existing integral transforms; as in the case of Shehu ADM, no perturbation parameter is required. Via literature, it is observed that fractional Schrödinger equations have never been solved in one, two, and three dimensions with the aid of a single integral transform. Therefore, due to the importance of such equations, in this research, concentration is focused upon the solution for the same, which retains the novelty of the study. Furthermore, convergence analyses are also incorporated in the article.
Motivation of the study
In the present research, an iterative regime is developed and incorporated named Shehu ADM regarding the solution of fractional Schr¨odinger equation in one, two, and three dimensions. The present regime is easy to implement and needs no complex calculation in the process of numerical discretization. Generating the numerical programs to deal with the fractional PDEs is cumbersome; therefore, generating such novel iterative regimes is demanded to fetch the approximated-analytical solutions.
There exist numerous transforms in the literature, but as per the calculation aspect, some transforms are easy to incorporate, but some are not. Shehu transform ADM is notified as one of the easiest methods. From an exploration of the literature, it is noticed that fractional Schrödinger equations are rarely solved in one, two, and three dimensions with the aid of a single integral transform-based method. Therefore, in this research, the focus is on finding the solution for the same, which contains the novelty of the research. Moreover, error analysis and convergence analysis are also elaborated in this article.
In the present paper, the convergence of the method is checked numerically. Convergence is affirmed via Tables 3–8. As per Tables 3–8, it is observed that on increasing the number of grid points the L∞ error norm got reduced rapidly, which is robust proof of the convergence of the generated semi-analytical techniques.
N | L∞ at t=1 | L∞ at t=2 | L∞ at t=3 |
11 | 2.4979e-08 | 5.0711e-05 | 4.3236e-03 |
21 | 4.4755e-16 | 4.1023e-14 | 2.0302e-10 |
31 | 4.4755e-16 | 5.6610e-16 | 1.3911e-15 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
N | L∞ at t=0.1 | L∞ at t=0.2 | L∞ at t=0.3 |
11 | 7.8430e-09 | 1.5949e-05 | 1.3635e-03 |
21 | 2.4825e-16 | 4.8963e-15 | 2.2250e-11 |
31 | 3.7238e-16 | 5.5788e-16 | 1.1802e-15 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−15 |
N | L∞ at t=1.0 | L∞ at t=1.3 | L∞ at t=1.5 |
21 | 3.1906e-07 | 7.8034e-05 | 1.5627e-03 |
31 | 8.4843e-15 | 7.0869e-12 | 5.9702e-10 |
41 | 6.4393e-15 | 2.9407e-14 | 5.6576e-14 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−15 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−14 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−14 |
N | L∞ at t=1.0 | L∞ at t=1.3 | L∞ at t=1.5 |
11 | 1.8114e-06 | 3.2318e-05 | 1.5541e-04 |
21 | 1.3092e-16 | 2.0510e-14 | 4.0767e-13 |
31 | 2.2377e-16 | 2.4825e-16 | 2.4825e-16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
N | L∞ at t=1 | L∞ at t=2 | L∞ at t=3 |
21 | 4.0910e-14 | 8.4807e-08 | 4.1536e-04 |
31 | 3.3766e-16 | 1.9860e-15 | 1.5697e-10 |
41 | 3.3766e-16 | 1.7342e-15 | 1.6577e-14 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−15 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−14 |
N | L∞ at t=1 | L∞ at t=2 | L∞ at t=3 |
21 | 4.4168e-13 | 9.1039e-07 | 4.4156e-03 |
31 | 5.7220e-17 | 5.5268e-14 | 1.5682e-08 |
41 | 4.6548e-17 | 6.9573e-16 | 8.8374e-15 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−17 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−15 |
● The present paper is divided into different sections and subsections.
● In Section 3, Implementation of the Shehu ADM is developed for various kinds of fractional Schr¨odinger equations.
● In Sub-section 3.1, the general formula is generated for 1D time-fractional Schrödinger equation.
● In Sub-section 3.2, the general formula is generated for 2D time-fractional Schrödinger equation.
● In Sub-section 3.3, the general formula is generated for 3D time-fractional Schrödinger equation.
● In Section 4, six examples are elaborated to validate the efficiency and efficacy of the developed regime.
● In Section 5, graphical analysis, error analysis, and convergence analysis is notified.
● Section 6 is provided as the concluding remarks.
Applying Shehu transform upon Eq (1):
iS[Dατθ(μ,τ)]=S[R[θ(μ,τ)]+N[θ(μ,τ)]+ϕ(μ,τ)]⇒S[Dατθ(μ,τ)]=−iS[R[θ(μ,τ)]+N[θ(μ,τ)]+ϕ(μ,τ)]⇒(sν)αS[θ(μ,τ)]−θ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)=−iS[R[θ(μ,τ)]+N[θ(μ,τ)]+ϕ(μ,τ)]⇒(sν)αS[θ(μ,τ)]=θ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)−iS[R[θ(μ,τ)]+N[θ(μ,τ)]+ϕ(μ,τ)]⇒S[θ(μ,τ)]=(νs)αθ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)−i(νs)αS[R[θ(μ,τ)]+N[θ(μ,τ)]+ϕ(μ,τ)]⇒θ(μ,τ)=S−1[(νs)αθ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)]−iS−1[(νs)αS[R[θ(μ,τ)]+N[θ(μ,τ)]+ϕ(μ,τ)]]⇒∞∑n=0θn(μ,τ)=S−1[(νs)αθ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)+ϕ(μ,τ)]−iS−1[(νs)αS[R[∑∞n=0θn(μ,τ)]+N[∑∞n=0θn(μ,τ)]]]. | (13) |
Where,
θ0(μ,τ)=S−1[(νs)α∑θ−1r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)+ϕ(μ,τ)]. | (14) |
θn+1(μ,τ)=−iS−1[(νs)αS[R[∑∞n=0θn(μ,τ)]+N[∑∞n=0θn(μ,τ)]]],n=0,1,2,3,… | (15) |
Applying Shehu transform upon Eq (2):
iS[Dαtθ(μ1,μ2,τ)]=S[R[θ(μ1,μ2,τ)]+N[θ(μ1,μ2,τ)]+ϕ(μ1,μ2,τ)]⇒S[Dαtθ(μ1,μ2,τ)]=−iS[R[θ(μ1,μ2,τ)]+N[θ(μ1,μ2,τ)]+ϕ(μ1,μ2,τ)]⇒(sν)αS[θ(μ1,μ2,τ)]−θ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ1,μ2,0)=−iS[R[θ(μ1,μ2,τ)]+N[θ(μ1,μ2,τ)]+ϕ(μ1,μ2,τ)]⇒(sν)αS[θ(μ1,μ2,τ)]=θ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ1,μ2,0)−iS[R[θ(μ1,μ2,τ)]+N[θ(μ1,μ2,τ)]+ϕ(μ1,μ2,τ)]⇒S[θ(μ1,μ2,τ)]=(νs)αθ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ1,μ2,0)−i(νs)αS[R[θ(μ1,μ2,τ)]+N[θ(μ1,μ2,τ)]+ϕ(μ1,μ2,τ)]⇒θ(μ1,μ2,τ)=S−1[(νs)αθ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ1,μ2,0)]−iS−1[(νs)αS[R[θ(μ1,μ2,τ)]+N[θ(μ1,μ2,τ)]+ϕ(μ1,μ2,τ)]]⇒∞∑n=0θn(μ1,μ2,τ)=S−1[(νs)αθ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ1,μ2,0)+ϕ(μ1,μ2,τ)]−iS−1[(νs)αS[R[∑∞n=0θn(μ1,μ2,τ)]+N[∑∞n=0θn(μ1,μ2,τ)]]]. | (16) |
Where,
θ0(μ1,μ2,τ)=S−1[(νs)α∑θ−1r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ1,μ2,0)+ϕ(μ1,μ2,τ)].θn+1(μ1,μ2,τ) | (17) |
=−iS−1[(νs)αS[R[∑∞n=0θn(μ1,μ2,τ)]+N[∑∞n=0θn(μ1,μ2,τ)]]],n=0,1,2,3,… | (18) |
Applying Shehu transform upon Eq (3):
iS[Dαtθ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]=S[R[θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+N[θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+ϕ(x,y,z,t)]⇒S[Dαtθ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]=−iS[R[θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+N[θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+ϕ(x,y,z,t)]⇒(sν)αS[θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]−θ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ1,μ2,μ3,0)=−iS[R[θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+N[θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+ϕ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]⇒(sν)αS[θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]=θ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ1,μ2,μ3,0)−iS[R[θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+N[θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+ϕ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]⇒S[θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]=(νs)αθ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ1,μ2,μ3,0)−i(νs)αS[R[θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+N[θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+ϕ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]⇒θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=S−1[(νs)αθ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ1,μ2,μ3,0)]−iS−1[(νs)αS[R[θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+N[θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+ϕ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]]⇒∞∑n=0θn(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=S−1[(νs)αθ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ1,μ2,μ3,0)+ϕ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]−iS−1[(νs)αS[R[∑∞n=0θn(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+N[∑∞n=0θn(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]]]. | (19) |
Where,
θ0(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=S−1[(νs)α∑θ−1r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ1,μ2,μ3,0)+ϕ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)].θn+1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ) | (20) |
=−iS−1[(νs)αS[R[∑∞n=0θn(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+N[∑∞n=0θn(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]]],n=0,1,2,3,… | (21) |
In the present section, six examples are tested to ensure the validity of the proposed regime, Examples 1–4 are associated with 1D time-fractional Schr¨odinger. Example 5 is provided regarding 2D time-fractional Schrödinger. Example 6 is associated with 3D time-fractional Schrödinger equation. In all the provided cases, approximated and exact profiles are generated.
Example 1: Considered 1D non-linear time-fractional Schr¨odinger as follows [36]:
iDαtθ+θμμ+2|θ|2θ=0. | (22) |
I.C.: θ(μ,0)=eiμ.
Applying Shehu transform upon Eq (22):
iS[Dατθ(μ,τ)]=−S[θμμ(μ,τ)+2|θ(μ,τ)|2θ(μ,τ)]⇒S[Dατθ(μ,τ)]=iS[θμμ(μ,τ)+2|θ(μ,τ)|2θ(μ,τ)]⇒(sν)αS[θ(μ,τ)]−ξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)=iS[θμμ(μ,τ)+2|θ(μ,τ)|2θ(μ,τ)]⇒(sν)αS[θ(μ,τ)]=ξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)+iS[θμμ(μ,τ)+2|θ(μ,τ)|2θ(μ,τ)]⇒S[θ(μ,τ)]=(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)+i(νs)αS[θμμ(μ,τ)+2|θ(μ,τ)|2θ(μ,τ)]⇒θ(μ,τ)=S−1[(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)]+iS−1[(νs)αS[θμμ(μ,τ)+2|θ(μ,τ)|2θ(μ,τ)]]⇒∑∞n=0θn(μ,τ)=S−1[(νs)α∑ξ−1r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)]+iS−1[(νs)αS[(∑∞n=0θn(μ,τ))μμ+2∑∞n=0An]]. | (23) |
Where
F(θ)=|θ(μ,τ)|2θ(μ,τ)=∞∑n=0An. |
θ0(μ,τ)=S−1[(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)]. |
θn+1(μ,τ)=iS−1[(νs)αS[(θn(μ,τ))μμ+2An]],n=0,1,2,3,… |
Considered, ξ=1:
θ0(μ,τ)=S−1[(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)] |
⇒θ0(μ,τ)=S−1[(νs)α(sν)α−1θ(μ,0)] |
⇒θ0(μ,τ)=θ(μ,0)=eiμ. |
Considered n=0:
θ1(μ,τ)=iS−1[(νs)αS[(θ0(μ,τ))μμ+2A0]]. |
Where,
(θ0)μμ(μ,τ)=−eix,A0=F(θ0)=θ20−θ0=eiμ. |
θ1(μ,τ)=iS−1[(νs)αS[−eiμ+2eiμ]]. |
⇒θ1(μ,τ)=iS−1[(νs)αS[eiμ]] |
⇒θ1(μ,τ)=ieiμS−1[(νs)αS[1]] |
⇒θ1(μ,τ)=ieiμS−1[(νs)2α]⇒θ1(μ,τ)=ieiμt2α−1Γ(2α). |
Considered n=1:
θ2(μ,τ)=iS−1[(νs)αS[(θ1)μμ+2A1]]. |
Where,
(θ1)μμ(μ,τ)=−ieiμτ2α−1Γ(2α), |
A1=2θ0θ1−θ0+θ20−θ1=ieiμτ2α−1Γ(2α), |
θ2(μ,τ)=iS−1[(νs)αS[−ieiμτ2α−1Γ(2α)+2ieiμτ2α−1Γ(2α)]] |
⇒θ2(μ,τ)=iS−1[(νs)αS[ieiμτ2α−1Γ(2α)]] |
⇒θ2(μ,τ)=(i2eiμ)S−1[(νs)α(νs)2α] |
⇒θ2(μ,τ)=(i2eiμ)S−1[(νs)3α] |
⇒θ2(μ,τ)=i2eiμτ3α−1Γ(3α), |
θ(μ,τ)=θ0(μ,τ)+θ1(μ,τ)+θ2(μ,τ)+θ3(μ,τ)+… |
⇒θ(μ,τ)=eiμ+ieiμτ2α−1Γ(2α)+i2eiμτ3α−1Γ(3α)+… |
⇒θ(μ,τ)=eiμ[1+iτ2α−1Γ(2α)+i2τ3α−1Γ(3α)+…]. |
Considered α=1:
⇒θ(μ,τ)=eiμ[1+iτ1!+(iτ)22!+…] |
⇒θ(μ,τ)=ei[μ+t]. |
Example 2: Considered 1D linear time-fractional Schr¨odinger equation as follows [37]:
Dατθ(μ,τ)+iθμμ(μ,τ)=0. | (23) |
I.C.: θ(μ,0)=e3iμ
Applying Shehu transform in Eq (23):
(sν)αS[θ(μ,τ)]−ξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)=−iS[θμμ(μ,τ)] |
⇒(sν)αS[θ(μ,τ)]=ξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)−iS[θμμ(μ,τ)] |
⇒S[θ(μ,τ)]=(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)−i(νs)αS[θμμ(μ,τ)] |
⇒θ(μ,τ)=S−1[(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)]−iS−1[(νs)αS[θμμ(μ,τ)]] |
⇒∞∑n=0θn(μ,τ)=S−1[(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)]−iS−1[(νs)αS[(∞∑n=0θn(μ,τ))μμ]], |
θ0(μ,τ)=S−1[(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)], |
θn+1(μ,τ)=−iS−1[(νs)αS[(θn(μ,τ))μμ]],n=0,1,2,3,… |
Considered ξ=1:
θ0(μ,τ)=S−1[(νs)α(sν)α−1θ(μ,0)] |
⇒θ0(μ,τ)=S−1[(νs)θ(μ,0)] |
⇒θ0(μ,τ)=θ(μ,0)S−1[νs] |
⇒θ0(μ,τ)=θ(μ,0)=e3iμ. |
Considered n=0:
θ1(μ,τ)=−iS−1[(νs)αS[(θ0(μ,τ))μμ]],(θ0)μμ=(3i)2e3iμ |
⇒θ1(μ,τ)=−iS−1[(νs)αS[(3i)2e3iμ]] |
⇒θ1(μ,τ)=−i(3i)2e3iμS−1[(νs)αS[1]] |
⇒θ1(μ,τ)=−i(3i)2e3iμS−1[(νs)2α] |
⇒θ1(μ,τ)=9ie3iμτ2α−1Γ(2α). |
Considered n=1:
θ2(μ,τ)=−iS−1[(νs)αS[(θ1)μμ]],(θ1(μ,τ))μμ=81i3e3iμτ2α−1Γ(2α) |
⇒θ2(μ,τ)=−iS−1[(νs)αS[81i3e3iμτ2α−1Γ(2α)]] |
⇒θ2(μ,τ)=−i(81i3e3iμ)S−1[(νs)αS[τ2α−1Γ(2α)]] |
⇒θ2(μ,τ)=−i(81i3e3iμ)S−1[(νs)3α] |
⇒θ2(μ,τ)=81i2e3iμτ3α−1Γ(3α) |
⇒θ(μ,τ)=θ0(μ,τ)+θ1(μ,τ)+θ2(μ,τ)+θ3(μ,τ)+… |
⇒θ(μ,τ)=e3iμ+9ie3iμτ2α−1Γ(2α)+81i2e3iμτ3α−1Γ(3α)+… |
Considered α=1:
⇒θ(μ,τ)=e3iμ[1+9iτ1!+(9iτ)22!+…] |
⇒θ(μ,τ)=e3i[μ+3τ]. |
Example 3: Considered 1D linear time-fractional Schr¨odinger equation as follows [37]:
Dατθ(μ,τ)+iθμμ(μ,τ)=0. | (24) |
I.C.: θ(μ,0)=1+cosh(2μ)
Applying Shehu transform upon Eq (24):
S[Dατθ]=−iS[θμμ] |
⇒(sν)αS[θ(μ,τ)]−ξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)=−iS[θμμ(μ,τ)] |
⇒(sν)αS[θ(μ,τ)]=ξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)−iS[θμμ(μ,τ)] |
⇒S[θ(μ,τ)]=(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)−i(νs)αS[θμμ(μ,τ)] |
⇒θ(μ,τ)=S−1[(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)]−iS−1[(νs)αS[θμμ(μ,τ)]] |
⇒∞∑n=0θn(μ,τ)=S−1[(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)]−iS−1[(νs)αS[(∞∑n=0θn(μ,τ))μμ]]. |
Where
θ0(μ,τ)=S−1[(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)]. |
θn+1(μ,τ)=−iS−1[(νs)αS[(θn(μ,τ))μμ]],n=0,1,2,3,… |
Considered ξ=1:
⇒θ0(μ,τ)=S−1[(νs)α(sν)α−1θ(μ,0)] |
⇒θ0(μ,τ)=θ(x,0)S−1[νs] |
⇒θ0(μ,τ)=θ(μ,0)=1+cosh(2μ). |
Considered n=0:
θ1(μ,τ)=−iS−1[(νs)αS[(θ0(μ,τ))μμ]],(θ0)μμ=4cosh(2μ) |
⇒θ1(μ,τ)=−iS−1[(νs)αS[4cosh(2μ)]] |
⇒θ1(μ,τ)=−4icosh(2μ)S−1[(νs)2α] |
⇒θ1(μ,τ)=−4icosh(2μ)τ2α−1Γ(2α). |
Considered n=1:
θ2(μ,τ)=−iS−1[(νs)αS[(θ1)μμ]],(θ1(μ,τ))μμ=−16icosh(2μ)τ2α−1Γ(2α) |
⇒θ2(μ,τ)=−iS−1[(νs)αS[−16icosh(2μ)τ2α−1Γ(2α)]] |
⇒θ2(μ,τ)=16i2cosh(2μ)S−1[(νs)3α] |
⇒θ2(μ,τ)=16i2cosh(2μ)τ3α−1Γ(3α) |
⇒θ(μ,τ)=θ0(μ,τ)+θ1(μ,τ)+θ2(μ,τ)+θ3(μ,τ)+… |
⇒θ(μ,τ)=1+cosh(2μ)−4icosh(2μ)τ2α−1Γ(2α)+16i2cosh(2μ)τ3α−1Γ(3α)−… |
Considered α=1:
⇒θ(μ,τ)=1+cosh(2μ)[1−4iτ1!+(4iτ)22!−…] |
⇒θ(μ,τ)=1+cosh(2μ)exp[−4iτ]. |
Example 4: Considered 1D non-linear time-fractional Schr¨odinger equation as follows [38]:
iDαtθ(μ,τ)+12θμμ(μ,τ)−θ(μ,τ)cos2μ−θ(μ,τ)|θ(μ,τ)|2=0,μ∈[0,1]. | (25) |
I.C.: u(μ,0)=sinμ
Applying Shehu transform upon Eq (25):
iS[Dατθ(μ,τ)]=S[−12uμμ(μ,τ)+θ(μ,τ)cos2μ+θ(μ,τ)|θ(μ,τ)|2] |
⇒S[Dατθ(μ,τ)]=−iS[−12uμμ(μ,τ)+θ(μ,τ)cos2μ+θ(μ,τ)|θ(μ,τ)|2] |
⇒(sν)αS[θ(μ,τ)]−ξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)=−iS[−12uμμ(μ,τ)+θ(μ,τ)cos2μ+θ(μ,τ)|θ(μ,τ)|2] |
⇒(sν)αS[θ(μ,τ)]=ξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)−iS[−12uμμ(μ,τ)+θ(μ,τ)cos2μ+θ(μ,τ)|θ(μ,τ)|2] |
⇒S[θ(μ,τ)]=(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)−i(νs)αS[−12uμμ(μ,τ)+θ(μ,τ)cos2μ+θ(μ,τ)|θ(μ,τ)|2] |
⇒θ(μ,τ)=S−1[(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)]−iS−1[(νs)αS[−12uμμ(μ,τ)+θ(μ,τ)cos2μ+θ(μ,τ)|θ(μ,τ)|2]] |
⇒∞∑n=0θn(μ,τ)=S−1[(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)]+iS−1[(νs)αS[12(∞∑n=0un(μ,τ))μμ−cos2μ(∞∑n=0un(μ,τ))−∞∑n=0An]] |
θ0(μ,τ)=S−1[(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ,0)], |
θn+1(μ,τ)=iS−1[(νs)αS[12(θn(μ,τ))μμ−cos2μ(θn(μ,τ))−An]],n=0,1,2,3,… |
Considered ξ=1:
⇒θ0(μ,τ)=S−1[(νs)α(sν)α−1θ(μ,0)] |
⇒θ0(μ,τ)=θ(μ,0)S−1[νs] |
⇒θ0=u(μ,0)=sinμ. |
Considered n=0:
θ1(μ,τ)=iS−1[(νs)αS[12(θ0)μμ−cos2μ(θ0)−A0]]. |
Where,
(θ0)μμ=−sinμ,A0=F(θ0)=θ20−θ0=sin3μ |
⇒θ1(μ,τ)=iS−1[(νs)αS[12(−sinμ)−cos2x(sinμ)−sin3μ]] |
⇒θ1(μ,τ)=iS−1[(νs)αS[−32sinμ]] |
⇒θ1(μ,τ)=−3i2sinμS−1[(νs)2α] |
⇒θ1(μ,τ)=−3i2sinμτ2α−1Γ(2α). |
Considered n=1:
θ2(μ,τ)=iS−1[(νs)αS[12(θ1(μ,τ))μμ−cos2μ(θ1(μ,τ))−A1]]. |
Where
(θ1)μμ(μ,τ)=(3i2)sinμτ2α−1Γ(2α),A1=2θ0θ1−θ0+θ20−θ1=(−3i2)sin3μτ2α−1Γ(2α) |
⇒θ2(μ,τ)=iS−1[(νs)αS[12((3i2)sinμτ2α−1Γ(2α))−cos2μ(−3i2sinμτ2α−1Γ(2α))−((−3i2)sin3μτ2α−1Γ(2α))]] |
⇒θ2(μ,τ)=(9i24)sinμS−1[(νs)αS[τ2α−1Γ(2α)]] |
⇒θ2(μ,τ)=(9i24)sinμS−1[(νs)3α] |
⇒θ2(μ,τ)=(9i24)sinμτ3α−1Γ(3α) |
⇒θ(μ,τ)=θ0(μ,τ)+θ1(μ,τ)+θ2(μ,τ)+θ3(μ,τ)+… |
⇒θ(μ,τ)=sinμ−3i2sinμτ2α−1Γ(2α)+(9i24)sinμτ3α−1Γ(3α)−… |
Considered α=1:
⇒θ(μ,τ)=sinμ[1−(3iτ2)1!+(3iτ2)22!−…] |
⇒θ(μ,τ)=sinμexp[−3iτ2]. |
Example 5: Considered 2D non-linear time-fractional Schr¨odinger equation as follows [38]:
iDατθ=−12[θμ1μ1+θμ2μ2]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2)θ+θ|θ|2, | (26) |
where μ1,μ2∈[0,2π]×[0,2π].
I.C.: θ(μ1,μ2,0)=sinμ1sinμ2
Applying Shehu transform in Eq (26):
iS[Dατθ(μ1,μ2,τ)]=S[−12[θμ1μ1(μ1,μ2,τ)+θμ2μ2(μ1,μ2,τ)]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2)θ(μ1,μ2,τ)+θ(μ1,μ2,τ)|θ(μ1,μ2,τ)|2] |
⇒S[Dατθ(μ1,μ2,τ)]=−iS[−12[θμ1μ1(μ1,μ2,τ)+θμ2μ2(μ1,μ2,τ)]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2)θ(μ1,μ2,τ)+θ(μ1,μ2,τ)|θ(μ1,μ2,τ)|2] |
⇒(sν)αS[θ(μ1,μ2,τ)]−ξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ1,μ2,0)=−iS[−12[θμ1μ1(μ1,μ2,τ)+θμ2μ2(μ1,μ2,τ)]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2)θ(μ1,μ2,τ)+θ(μ1,μ2,τ)|θ(μ1,μ2,τ)|2] |
⇒(sν)αS[θ(μ1,μ2,τ)]=ξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ1,μ2,0)−iS[−12[θμ1μ1(μ1,μ2,τ)+θμ2μ2(μ1,μ2,τ)]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2)θ(μ1,μ2,τ)+θ(μ1,μ2,τ)|θ(μ1,μ2,τ)|2] |
⇒S[θ(μ1,μ2,τ)]=(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ1,μ2,0)−i(νs)αS[−12[θμ1μ1(μ1,μ2,τ)+θμ2μ2(μ1,μ2,τ)]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2)θ(μ1,μ2,τ)+θ(μ1,μ2,τ)|θ(μ1,μ2,τ)|2] |
⇒θ(μ1,μ2,τ)=S−1[(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ1,μ2,0)]−iS−1[(νs)αS[−12[θμ1μ1(μ1,μ2,τ)+θμ2μ2(μ1,μ2,τ)]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2)θ(μ1,μ2,τ)+θ(μ1,μ2,τ)|θ(μ1,μ2,τ)|2]] |
⇒∞∑n=0θn(μ1,μ2,τ)=S−1[(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ1,μ2,0)]−iS−1[(νs)αS[−12[(∞∑n=0θn(μ1,μ2,τ))μ1μ1+(∞∑n=0θn(μ1,μ2,τ))μ2μ2]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2)∞∑n=0un(μ1,μ2,τ)+∞∑n=0An]] |
u0(μ1,μ2,τ)=S−1[(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ1,μ2,0)], |
un+1(μ1,μ2,τ)=−iS−1[(νs)αS[−12[(θn)μ1μ1(μ1,μ2,τ)+(θn)μ2μ2(μ1,μ2,τ)]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2)θn(μ1,μ2,τ)+An]],n=0,1,2,3,… |
Considered ξ=1:
⇒θ0(μ1,μ2,τ)=S−1[(νs)α(sν)α−1θ(μ1,μ2,0)] |
⇒θ0(μ1,μ2,τ)=θ(μ1,μ2,0), |
θ0(μ1,μ2,τ)=sinμ1sinμ2. |
Considered n=0:
u1(μ1,μ2,τ)=−iS−1[(νs)αS[−12[(θ0)μ1μ1(μ1,μ2,τ)+(θ0)μ2μ2(μ1,μ2,τ)]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2)θ0(μ1,μ2,τ)+A0]]. |
Where
(θ0)μ1μ1(μ1,μ2,τ)=(θ0)μ2μ2(μ1,μ2,τ)=−sinμ1sinμ2, |
and
A0=θ20−θ0=sin3μ1sin3μ2 |
⇒θ1(μ1,μ2,τ) |
=−iS−1[(νs)αS[−12[−2sinμ1sinμ2]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2)(sinμ1sinμ2)+sin3μ1sin3μ2]] |
⇒θ1(μ1,μ2,τ)=−iS−1[(νs)αS[2sinμ1sinμ2]] |
⇒θ1(μ1,μ2,τ)=−i(2sinμ1sinμ2)S−1[(νs)αS[1]] |
⇒θ1(μ1,μ2,τ)=−2isinμ1sinμ2S−1[(νs)2α] |
⇒θ1(μ1,μ2,τ)=−2isinμ1sinμ2τ2α−1Γ(2α). |
Considered n=1:
θ2(μ1,μ2,τ)=−iS−1[(νs)αS[−12[(u1)μ1μ1(μ1,μ2,τ)+(u1)μ2μ2(μ1,μ2,τ)]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2)u1(μ1,μ2,τ)+A1]]. |
Where,
(θ1)μ1μ1=(θ1)μ2μ2=2isinμ1sinμ2τ2α−1Γ(2α), |
(θ1)μ1μ1+(θ1)μ2μ2=4isinμ1sinμ2τ2α−1Γ(2α), |
A1=2θ0θ1−θ0+θ20−θ1=−2isin3μ1sin3μ2τ2α−1Γ(2α) |
⇒θ2(μ1,μ2,τ) |
=−iS−1[(νs)αS[−12[4isinμ1sinμ2τ2α−1Γ(2α)]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2)(−2isinμ1sinμ2τ2α−1Γ(2α))+(−2isin3xsin3yτ2α−1Γ(2α))]] |
⇒θ2(μ1,μ2,τ)=−iS−1[(νs)αS{−4isinμ1sinμ2τ2α−1Γ(2α)}] |
⇒θ2(μ1,μ2,τ)=4i2sinμ1sinμ2S−1[(νs)3α] |
⇒θ2(μ1,μ2,τ)=4i2sinμ1sinμ2τ3α−1Γ(3α) |
⇒θ(μ1,μ2,τ)=u0(μ1,μ2,τ)+u1(μ1,μ2,τ)+u2(μ1,μ2,τ)+u3(μ1,μ2,τ)+… |
⇒θ(μ1,μ2,τ)=sinμ1sinμ2−2isinμ1sinμ2τ2α−1Γ(2α)+4i2sinμ1sinμ2τ3α−1Γ(3α)−… |
Considered α=1:
⇒θ(μ1,μ2,τ)=sinμ1sinμ2[1−2iτ1!+(2iτ)22!−…] |
⇒θ(μ1,μ2,τ)=sinμ1sinμ2exp(−2iτ). |
Example 6: Considered 2D non-linear time-fractional Schr¨odinger equation as follows [34]:
iDατθ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=−12[θμ1μ1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θμ2μ2(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θμ3μ3(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2sin2μ3)θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)|θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)|2. | (27) |
Where μ1,μ2,μ3∈[0,2π]×[0,2π]×[0,2π].
I.C.: θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,0)=sinμ1sinμ2sinμ3
Applying Shehu transform in Eq (27):
iS[Dαtθ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]=S[−12[θμ1μ1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θμ2μ2(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θμ3μ3(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2sin2μ3)θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)|θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)|2] |
⇒S[Dαtθ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]=−iS[−12[θμ1μ1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θμ2μ2(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θμ3μ3(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2sin2μ3)θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)|θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)|2] |
⇒(sν)αS[θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]−ξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1ur(x,y,z,0)=−iS[−12[θμ1μ1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θμ2μ2(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θμ3μ3(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2sin2μ3)θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)|θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)|2] |
⇒(sν)αS[θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]=ξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(x,y,z,0)−iS[−12[θμ1μ1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θμ2μ2(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θμ3μ3(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2sin2μ3)θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)|θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)|2] |
⇒S[θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]=(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ1,μ2,μ3,0)−i(νs)αS[−12[θμ1μ1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θμ2μ2(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θμ3μ3(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2sin2μ3)θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)|θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)|2] |
⇒θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=S−1[(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ1,μ2,μ3,0)]−iS−1[(νs)αS[−12[θμ1μ1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θμ2μ2(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θμ3μ3(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2sin2μ3)θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)|θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)|2]] |
⇒∞∑n=0θn(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=S−1[(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ1,μ2,μ3,0)]−iS−1[(νs)αS[−12[(∞∑n=0θn(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ))μ1μ1+(∞∑n=0θn(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ))μ2μ2+(∞∑n=0θn(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ))μ3μ3]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2sin2μ3)∞∑n=0θn(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+∞∑n=0An]], |
θ0(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=S−1[(νs)αξ−1∑r=0(sν)α−r−1θr(μ1,μ2,μ3,0)], |
θn+1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=−iS−1[(νs)αS[−12[(θn)μ1μ1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+(θn)μ2μ2(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+(θn)μ3μ3(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2sin2μ3)θn(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+An]],n=0,1,2,3,… |
Considered ξ=1:
⇒θ0(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=S−1[(νs)α(sν)α−1θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,0)] |
⇒θ0(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,0) |
⇒θ0(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=sinμ1sinμ2sinμ3. |
Considered n=0:
θ1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=−iS−1[(νs)αS[−12[(θ0)μ1μ1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+(θ0)μ2μ2(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+(θ0)μ3μ3(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2sin2μ3)θ0(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+A0]]. |
Where
(θ0)μ1μ1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=(θ0)μ2μ2(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=(θ0)μ3μ3(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=−sinμ1sinμ2sinμ3(θ0)μ1μ1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+(θ0)μ2μ2(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+(θ0)μ3μ3(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=−3sinμ1sinμ2sinμ3, |
and
A0=θ20−θ0=sin3μ1sin3μ2sin3μ3 |
⇒θ1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ) |
=−iS−1[(νs)αS[−12[−3sinμ1sinμ2sinμ3]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2sin2μ3)(sinμ1sinμ2sinμ3)+sin3μ1sin3μ2sin3μ3]] |
⇒θ1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=−iS−1[(νs)αS[52sinμ1sinμ2sinμ3]] |
⇒θ1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=−5i2sinμ1sinμ2sinμ3S−1[(νs)αS[1]] |
⇒θ1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=−5i2sinμ1sinμ2sinμ3S−1[(νs)2α] |
⇒θ1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=−5i2sinμ1sinμ2sinμ3τ2α−1Γ(2α). |
Considered n=1:
θ2(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=−iS−1[(νs)αS[−12[(θ1)μ1μ1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+(θ1)μ2μ2(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+(θ1)μ3μ3(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)]+(1−sin2μ1sin2μ2sin2μ3)θ1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+A1]]. |
Where,
(θ1)μ1μ1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=(θ1)μ2μ2(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=(θ1)μ3μ3(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ) |
=(5i2)sinμ1sinμ2sinμ3τ2α−1Γ(2α). |
A1=2θ0θ1−θ0+θ20−θ1=−5i2μ1sin3μ2sin3μ3τ2α−1Γ(2α) |
⇒θ2(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=−iS−1[(νs)αS{−25i4sinμ1sinμ2sinμ3τ2α−1Γ(2α)}] |
⇒θ2(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=25i24sinμ1sinμ2sinμ3S−1[(νs)3α] |
⇒θ2(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=25i24sinμ1sinμ2sinμ3τ3α−1Γ(3α) |
⇒θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=θ0(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θ1(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θ2(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+θ3(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)+… |
⇒θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=sinμ1sinμ2sinμ3−5i2sinμ1sinμ2sinμ3τ2α−1Γ(2α)+25i24sinμ1sinμ2sinμ3τ3α−1Γ(3α)−… |
Considered α=1:
⇒θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=sinμ1sinμ2sinμ3[1−(5iτ2)1!+(5iτ2)22!−…] |
⇒θ(μ1,μ2,μ3,τ)=sinμ1sinμ2sinμ3exp(−5iτ2). |
In the present section, the validity of the proposed regime is affirmed vias graphical and tabular analysis of the results. In Figure 1, approx. and exact profiles are matched at τ = 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 for Example 1. In Figure 2, matching of approx. and exact profiles are provided at τ = 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 for Example 1. A wide range of time levels is checked for compatibility. In Figure 3, a match of approx. and exact profiles is provided at τ = 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 for Example 2. Figure 4 is related to the approx. and exact profile compatibility at τ = 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 for Example 3. In Figure 5, compatibility of approx. and exact profiles are matched at τ = 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 for Example 4. In Figure 6, approx.-exact compatibility is mentioned at τ = 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 for Example 4. Figures 7 and 8 are related to the mesh-contour and surface-contour presentations at τ = 1 and τ = 2 respectively for Example 5. Figures 9 and 10 are related to the mesh-contour and surface-contour presentations at τ = 1 and τ = 2, respectively for Example 6.
Via Tables 3–8, it can be affirmed that the approx. and exact profiles are matched for a wide range of time levels regarding the proposed scheme. Error analysis and convergence property are done by means of Tables 3–8. In Tables 3–8, L∞ errors are provided at various grid points and time levels. Via Tables 3–8, it is reported that on increasing the number of grid points at different time levels, L∞ error got reduced, and in most of the cases, convergence is affirmed up to higher order.
In the present study, the motive is to deal with 1D, 2D, and 3D time-fractional Schr¨odinger equations regarding the approx.-analytical outcome. Shehu transform ADM is incorporated for this purpose. The prime key of a developed regime is it's easy-to-implement approach and accurate results. Furthermore, with the aid of the six mentioned examples, it is ensured that the retrieved approximated profiles are compatible with exact profiles. The graphical matching aspect between the approximated and exact results is also notified, which ensures that the developed technique is a good alternative to solve complex natured time-fractional PDEs. L∞ error is mentioned inTables 3–8. Via mentioned tables, it is ensured that the proposed methodology is convergent, as on increasing the number of grid points, L∞ error got reduced. With the aid of the developed regime, various complex natured fractional PDEs can be easily solved.
This research received funding support from the NSRF via the Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development, Research and Innovation (grant number B05F640092).
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
[1] |
K. H. Jung, H. Kim, Linear consecutive-k-out-of-n: F system reliability with common-mode forced outages, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 41 (1993), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X221142815 doi: 10.1177/1748006X221142815
![]() |
[2] |
J. Shen, M. J. Zuo, Optimal design of series consecutive-k-out-of-n: G systems, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 45 (1994), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(94)90144-9 doi: 10.1016/0951-8320(94)90144-9
![]() |
[3] |
P. J. Boland, F. J. Samaniego, Stochastic ordering results for consecutive k-out-of-n:F systems, IEEE T. Reliab., 53 (2004), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2004.824830 doi: 10.1109/TR.2004.824830
![]() |
[4] |
S. Eryılmaz, Mixture representations for the reliability of consecutive-k systems, Math. Comput. Model., 51 (2010), 405–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2009.12.007 doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2009.12.007
![]() |
[5] | W. Kuo, M. J. Zuo, Optimal reliability modeling: principles and applications, John Wiley and Sons, 2003. |
[6] | C. In-Hang, L. Cui, F. K Hwang, Reliabilities of consecutive-k systems, Springer Science and Business Media, 2013. |
[7] |
S. Eryılmaz, Conditional lifetimes of consecutive k-out-of-n systems, IEEE T. Reliab., 59 (2010), 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1109/TR.2010.2040775 doi: 10.1109/TR.2010.2040775
![]() |
[8] |
S. Eryılmaz, Reliability properties of consecutive k-out-of-n systems of arbitrarily dependent components, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 94 (2009), 350–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2008.03.027 doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2008.03.027
![]() |
[9] |
J. Navarro, S. Eryılmaz, Mean residual lifetimes of consecutive-k-out-of-n systems, J. Appl. Probab., 44 (2007), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.1239/jap/1175267165 doi: 10.1239/jap/1175267165
![]() |
[10] |
N. Ebrahimi, E. S. Soofi, H. Zahedi, Information properties of order statistics and spacings, IEEE T. Reliab., 50 (2004), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2003.821973 doi: 10.1109/TIT.2003.821973
![]() |
[11] |
C. E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication, Bell Syst. Tech. J., 27 (1948), 379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
![]() |
[12] |
M. Rao, Y. Chen, B. C. Vemuri, F. Wang, Cumulative residual entropy: a new measure of information, IEEE T. Inform. Theory, 50 (2004), 1220–1228. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2004.828057 doi: 10.1109/TIT.2004.828057
![]() |
[13] |
M. Asadi, N. Ebrahimi, Residual entropy and its characterizations in terms of hazard function and mean residual life function, Stat. Probabil. Lett., 49 (2000), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7152(00)00056-0 doi: 10.1016/S0167-7152(00)00056-0
![]() |
[14] |
N. Navarro, Y. del Aguila, M. Asadi, Some new results on the cumulative residual entropy, J. Stat. Plan. Infer., 140 (2010), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2009.07.015 doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2009.07.015
![]() |
[15] |
A. Di Crescenzo, M. Longobardi, On cumulative entropies, J. Stat. Plan. Infer., 139 (2009), 4072–4087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2009.05.038 doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2009.05.038
![]() |
[16] |
J. Ahmadi, A. Di Crescenzo, M. Longobardi, On dynamic mutual information for bivariate lifetimes, Adv. Appl. Probab., 47 (2015), 1157–1174. https://doi.org/10.1239/aap/1449859804 doi: 10.1239/aap/1449859804
![]() |
[17] |
A. Di Crescenzo, A. Toomaj, Extension of the past lifetime and its connection to the cumulative entropy, J. Appl. Probab., 52 (2015), 1156–1174. https://doi.org/10.1239/jap/1450802759 doi: 10.1239/jap/1450802759
![]() |
[18] |
S. Kayal, On generalized cumulative entropies, Probab. Eng. Inform. Sc., 30 (2016), 640–662. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269964816000218 doi: 10.1017/S0269964816000218
![]() |
[19] |
S. Kayal, R. Moharana, A shift-dependent generalized cumulative entropy of order n, Commun. Stat.-Simul. C, 48 (2019), 1768–1783. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2018.1423692 doi: 10.1080/03610918.2018.1423692
![]() |
[20] | A. Di Crescenzo, M. Longobardi, On cumulative entropies and lifetime estimations, In International Work-Conference on the Interplay Between Natural and Artificial Computation, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2009,132–141. |
[21] | C. Kundu, A. Di Crescenzo, M. Longobardi, On cumulative residual (past) inaccuracy for truncated random variables, Metrika, 79 (2016), 335–356. |
[22] |
A. Toomaj, M. Doostparast, A note on signature‐based expressions for the entropy of mixed r‐out‐of‐n systems, Nav. Res. Log., 61 (2014), 202–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21577 doi: 10.1002/nav.21577
![]() |
[23] |
A. Toomaj, S. M. Sunoj, J. Navarro, Some properties of the cumulative residual entropy of coherent and mixed systems, J. Appl. Probab., 54 (2017), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1017/jpr.2017.6 doi: 10.1017/jpr.2017.6
![]() |
[24] |
G. Alomani, M. Kayid, Fractional survival functional entropy of engineering systems, Entropy, 24 (2022), 1275. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24091275 doi: 10.3390/e24091275
![]() |
[25] |
M. Shrahili, M. Kayid, Cumulative entropy of past lifetime for coherent systems at the system level, Axioms, 12 (2023), 899. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12090899 doi: 10.3390/axioms12090899
![]() |
[26] |
M. Kayid, M. Shrahili, Rényi entropy for past lifetime distributions with application in inactive coherent systems, Symmetry, 15 (2023), 1310. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15071310 doi: 10.3390/sym15071310
![]() |
[27] | S. Eryılmaz, J. Navarro, Failure rates of consecutive k-out-of-n systems, J. Korean Stat. Soc., 41 (2012), 1–11. |
[28] | J. C. Chang, F. K. Hwang, Reliabilities of consecutive-k systems, In Handbook of Reliability Engineering, London: Springer, 2003. |
[29] |
M. Hashempour, M. Mohammadi, A new measure of inaccuracy for record statistics based on extropy, Probab. Eng. Inform. Sc., 38 (2024), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269964823000086 doi: 10.1017/S0269964823000086
![]() |
[30] |
S. Y. Lee, B. K. Mallick, Bayesian hierarchical modeling: Application towards production results in the eagle ford shale of south Texas, Sankhya Ser. B, 84 (2022), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13571-020-00245-8 doi: 10.1007/s13571-020-00245-8
![]() |
[31] | P. J. Bickel, E. L. Lehmann, Descriptive statistics for nonparametric models. III. Dispersion, In Selected works of EL Lehmann, Boston, MA: Springer US, 2011,499–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1412-4_44 |
[32] |
I. Jewitt, Choosing between risky prospects: the characterization of comparative statics results, and location independent risk, Manag. Sci., 35 (1989), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.1.60 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.35.1.60
![]() |
[33] | M. Shaked, J. G. Shanthikumar, Stochastic orders, New York: Springer, 2007. |
[34] |
M. Landsberger, I. Meilijson, The generating process and an extension of Jewitt's location independent risk concept, Manag. Sci., 40 (1994), 662–669. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.5.662 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.40.5.662
![]() |
[35] |
I. A. Husseiny, H. M. Barakat, M. Nagy, A. H. Mansi, Analyzing symmetric distributions by utilizing extropy measures based on order statistics, J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sc., 17 (2024), 101100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2024.101100 doi: 10.1016/j.jrras.2024.101100
![]() |
[36] | N. Gupta, S. K. Chaudhary, Some characterizations of continuous symmetric distributions based on extropy of record values, Stat. Pap., 65 (2024), 291–308. |
[37] |
A. Di Crescenzo, A. Toomaj, Further results on the generalized cumulative entropy, Kybernetik, 53 (2017), 959–982. https://doi.org/10.14736/kyb-2017-5-0959 doi: 10.14736/kyb-2017-5-0959
![]() |
[38] |
O. Vasicek, A test for normality based on sample entropy, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B, 38 (1976), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1976.tb01566.x doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1976.tb01566.x
![]() |
[39] |
N. Balakrishnan, V. Leiva, A. Sanhueza, E. Cabrera, Mixture inverse Gaussian distributions and its transformations, moments and applications, Statistics, 43 (2009), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02331880701829948 doi: 10.1080/02331880701829948
![]() |
[40] |
D. K. Bhaumik, R. D. Gibbons, One-sided approximate prediction intervals for at least p of m observations from a gamma population at each of r locations, Technometrics, 48 (2006), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1198/004017005000000355 doi: 10.1198/004017005000000355
![]() |
1. | Nourhane Attia, Ali Akgül, Djamila Seba, Abdelkader Nour, Manuel De la Sen, Mustafa Bayram, An Efficient Approach for Solving Differential Equations in the Frame of a New Fractional Derivative Operator, 2023, 15, 2073-8994, 144, 10.3390/sym15010144 | |
2. | Mamta Kapoor, Samanyu Khosla, Series Solution to Fractional Telegraph Equations Using an Iterative Scheme Based on Yang Transform, 2024, 0971-3514, 10.1007/s12591-024-00679-w | |
3. | Mamta Kapoor, Varun Joshi, A comparative study of Sumudu HPM and Elzaki HPM for coupled Burgers’ equation, 2023, 9, 24058440, e15726, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15726 | |
4. | M. L. Rupa, K. Aruna, Optical solitons of time fractional Kundu–Eckhaus equation and massive Thirring system arises in quantum field theory, 2024, 56, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-023-05914-2 | |
5. | Mamta Kapoor, A Robust study upon fuzzy fractional 2D Heat equation via semi-analytical technique, 2025, 26668181, 101207, 10.1016/j.padiff.2025.101207 | |
6. | Somayeh Nemati, Salameh Sedaghat, Sajedeh Arefi, A new numerical approach for solving space–time fractional Schrödinger differential equations via fractional-order Chelyshkov functions, 2025, 26, 25900374, 100584, 10.1016/j.rinam.2025.100584 | |
7. | Wan-ran Ding, Si-ming Li, Hui-ning Xue, Almost global existence for d-dimensional fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation on flat torus, 2025, 40, 1005-1031, 480, 10.1007/s11766-025-5328-0 |
ϵ(τ) | S[ϵ(τ)]=F(s,ν) | |
1. | 1 | νs |
2. | τ | ν2s2 |
3. | τm,m∈N | ∠m(νs)m+1 |
4. | τm,m>−1 | Γ(m+1)(νs)m+1 |
5. | eaτ | νs−aν |
6. | sin(mτ) | mν2s2+m2ν2 |
7. | cos(mτ) | sν2s2+m2ν2 |
8. | sinh(mτ) | mν2s2−m2ν2 |
9. | cosh(mτ) | sν2s2−m2ν2 |
F(s,ν) | ϵ(τ)=S−1[F(s,ν)] | |
1. | νs | 1 |
2. | ν2s2 | τ |
3. | (νs)m+1 | τm∠m |
4. | Γ(m+1)(νs)m+1 | τmΓ(m+1) |
5. | νs−aν | eaτ |
6. | mν2s2+m2ν2 | sin(mτ) |
7. | sν2s2+m2ν2 | cos(mτ) |
8. | mν2s2−m2ν2 | sinh(mτ) |
9. | sν2s2−m2ν2 | cosh(mτ) |
N | L∞ at t=1 | L∞ at t=2 | L∞ at t=3 |
11 | 2.4979e-08 | 5.0711e-05 | 4.3236e-03 |
21 | 4.4755e-16 | 4.1023e-14 | 2.0302e-10 |
31 | 4.4755e-16 | 5.6610e-16 | 1.3911e-15 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
N | L∞ at t=0.1 | L∞ at t=0.2 | L∞ at t=0.3 |
11 | 7.8430e-09 | 1.5949e-05 | 1.3635e-03 |
21 | 2.4825e-16 | 4.8963e-15 | 2.2250e-11 |
31 | 3.7238e-16 | 5.5788e-16 | 1.1802e-15 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−15 |
N | L∞ at t=1.0 | L∞ at t=1.3 | L∞ at t=1.5 |
21 | 3.1906e-07 | 7.8034e-05 | 1.5627e-03 |
31 | 8.4843e-15 | 7.0869e-12 | 5.9702e-10 |
41 | 6.4393e-15 | 2.9407e-14 | 5.6576e-14 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−15 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−14 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−14 |
N | L∞ at t=1.0 | L∞ at t=1.3 | L∞ at t=1.5 |
11 | 1.8114e-06 | 3.2318e-05 | 1.5541e-04 |
21 | 1.3092e-16 | 2.0510e-14 | 4.0767e-13 |
31 | 2.2377e-16 | 2.4825e-16 | 2.4825e-16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
N | L∞ at t=1 | L∞ at t=2 | L∞ at t=3 |
21 | 4.0910e-14 | 8.4807e-08 | 4.1536e-04 |
31 | 3.3766e-16 | 1.9860e-15 | 1.5697e-10 |
41 | 3.3766e-16 | 1.7342e-15 | 1.6577e-14 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−15 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−14 |
N | L∞ at t=1 | L∞ at t=2 | L∞ at t=3 |
21 | 4.4168e-13 | 9.1039e-07 | 4.4156e-03 |
31 | 5.7220e-17 | 5.5268e-14 | 1.5682e-08 |
41 | 4.6548e-17 | 6.9573e-16 | 8.8374e-15 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−17 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−15 |
ϵ(τ) | S[ϵ(τ)]=F(s,ν) | |
1. | 1 | νs |
2. | τ | ν2s2 |
3. | τm,m∈N | ∠m(νs)m+1 |
4. | τm,m>−1 | Γ(m+1)(νs)m+1 |
5. | eaτ | νs−aν |
6. | sin(mτ) | mν2s2+m2ν2 |
7. | cos(mτ) | sν2s2+m2ν2 |
8. | sinh(mτ) | mν2s2−m2ν2 |
9. | cosh(mτ) | sν2s2−m2ν2 |
F(s,ν) | ϵ(τ)=S−1[F(s,ν)] | |
1. | νs | 1 |
2. | ν2s2 | τ |
3. | (νs)m+1 | τm∠m |
4. | Γ(m+1)(νs)m+1 | τmΓ(m+1) |
5. | νs−aν | eaτ |
6. | mν2s2+m2ν2 | sin(mτ) |
7. | sν2s2+m2ν2 | cos(mτ) |
8. | mν2s2−m2ν2 | sinh(mτ) |
9. | sν2s2−m2ν2 | cosh(mτ) |
N | L∞ at t=1 | L∞ at t=2 | L∞ at t=3 |
11 | 2.4979e-08 | 5.0711e-05 | 4.3236e-03 |
21 | 4.4755e-16 | 4.1023e-14 | 2.0302e-10 |
31 | 4.4755e-16 | 5.6610e-16 | 1.3911e-15 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
N | L∞ at t=0.1 | L∞ at t=0.2 | L∞ at t=0.3 |
11 | 7.8430e-09 | 1.5949e-05 | 1.3635e-03 |
21 | 2.4825e-16 | 4.8963e-15 | 2.2250e-11 |
31 | 3.7238e-16 | 5.5788e-16 | 1.1802e-15 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−15 |
N | L∞ at t=1.0 | L∞ at t=1.3 | L∞ at t=1.5 |
21 | 3.1906e-07 | 7.8034e-05 | 1.5627e-03 |
31 | 8.4843e-15 | 7.0869e-12 | 5.9702e-10 |
41 | 6.4393e-15 | 2.9407e-14 | 5.6576e-14 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−15 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−14 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−14 |
N | L∞ at t=1.0 | L∞ at t=1.3 | L∞ at t=1.5 |
11 | 1.8114e-06 | 3.2318e-05 | 1.5541e-04 |
21 | 1.3092e-16 | 2.0510e-14 | 4.0767e-13 |
31 | 2.2377e-16 | 2.4825e-16 | 2.4825e-16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
N | L∞ at t=1 | L∞ at t=2 | L∞ at t=3 |
21 | 4.0910e-14 | 8.4807e-08 | 4.1536e-04 |
31 | 3.3766e-16 | 1.9860e-15 | 1.5697e-10 |
41 | 3.3766e-16 | 1.7342e-15 | 1.6577e-14 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−15 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−14 |
N | L∞ at t=1 | L∞ at t=2 | L∞ at t=3 |
21 | 4.4168e-13 | 9.1039e-07 | 4.4156e-03 |
31 | 5.7220e-17 | 5.5268e-14 | 1.5682e-08 |
41 | 4.6548e-17 | 6.9573e-16 | 8.8374e-15 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−17 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−16 |
![]() Convergence up to 10−15 |