In this paper, we investigate a von Karman plate system with general type of relaxation functions on the boundary. We derive the general decay rate result without requiring the assumption that the initial value w0≡0 on the boundary, using the multiplier method and some properties of the convex functions. Here we consider the resolvent kernels ki(i=1,2), namely k″i(t)≥−ξi(t)Gi(−k′i(t)), where Gi are convex and increasing functions near the origin and ξi are positive nonincreasing functions. Moreover, the energy decay rates depend on the functions ξi and Gi. These general decay estimates allow for certain relaxation functions which are not necessarily of exponential or polynomial decay and therefore improve earlier results in the literature.
Citation: Jum-Ran Kang. General decay of solutions for a von Karman plate system with general type of relaxation functions on the boundary[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(1): 2308-2325. doi: 10.3934/math.2024114
[1] | Zayd Hajjej, Sun-Hye Park . Asymptotic stability of a quasi-linear viscoelastic Kirchhoff plate equation with logarithmic source and time delay. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 24087-24115. doi: 10.3934/math.20231228 |
[2] | Adel M. Al-Mahdi, Mohammad M. Al-Gharabli, Maher Nour, Mostafa Zahri . Stabilization of a viscoelastic wave equation with boundary damping and variable exponents: Theoretical and numerical study. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 15370-15401. doi: 10.3934/math.2022842 |
[3] | Hasan Almutairi, Soh Edwin Mukiawa . On the uniform stability of a thermoelastic Timoshenko system with infinite memory. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 16260-16279. doi: 10.3934/math.2024787 |
[4] | Adel M. Al-Mahdi, Mohammad M. Al-Gharabli, Mohamed Alahyane . Theoretical and numerical stability results for a viscoelastic swelling porous-elastic system with past history. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 11921-11949. doi: 10.3934/math.2021692 |
[5] | Peipei Wang, Yanting Wang, Fei Wang . Indirect stability of a 2D wave-plate coupling system with memory viscoelastic damping. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 19718-19736. doi: 10.3934/math.2024962 |
[6] | Soh E. Mukiawa, Tijani A. Apalara, Salim A. Messaoudi . Stability rate of a thermoelastic laminated beam: Case of equal-wave speed and nonequal-wave speed of propagation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 333-361. doi: 10.3934/math.2021021 |
[7] | Qian Li . General and optimal decay rates for a viscoelastic wave equation with strong damping. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18282-18296. doi: 10.3934/math.20221006 |
[8] | Jincheng Shi, Jianye Xia, Wenjing Zhi . Blow-up of energy solutions for the semilinear generalized Tricomi equation with nonlinear memory term. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 10907-10919. doi: 10.3934/math.2021634 |
[9] | Qian Li, Yanyuan Xing . General and optimal decay rates for a system of wave equations with damping and a coupled source term. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 29404-29424. doi: 10.3934/math.20241425 |
[10] | Adel M. Al-Mahdi . The coupling system of Kirchhoff and Euler-Bernoulli plates with logarithmic source terms: Strong damping versus weak damping of variable-exponent type. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 27439-27459. doi: 10.3934/math.20231404 |
In this paper, we investigate a von Karman plate system with general type of relaxation functions on the boundary. We derive the general decay rate result without requiring the assumption that the initial value w0≡0 on the boundary, using the multiplier method and some properties of the convex functions. Here we consider the resolvent kernels ki(i=1,2), namely k″i(t)≥−ξi(t)Gi(−k′i(t)), where Gi are convex and increasing functions near the origin and ξi are positive nonincreasing functions. Moreover, the energy decay rates depend on the functions ξi and Gi. These general decay estimates allow for certain relaxation functions which are not necessarily of exponential or polynomial decay and therefore improve earlier results in the literature.
The purpose of this work is to investigate the general decay of the solutions to the von Karman plate system with a memory condition on the boundary:
wtt+Δ2w=[w,v] in Ω×(0,∞), | (1.1) |
Δ2v=−[w,w] in Ω×(0,∞), | (1.2) |
v=∂v∂ν=0 on Γ×(0,∞), | (1.3) |
∂w∂ν+∫t0h1(t−s)(A1w(s)+α1∂w(s)∂ν)ds=0 on Γ×(0,∞), | (1.4) |
w−∫t0h2(t−s)(A2w(s)−α2w(s))ds=0 on Γ×(0,∞), | (1.5) |
w(x,0)=w0(x), wt(x,0)=w1(x) in Ω, | (1.6) |
where Ω⊂R2 is a bounded domain with smooth boundary Γ and x=(x1,x2). The constants α1 and α2 are positive. The von Karman bracket [w,u] denotes the bilinear expression
[w,u]=wx1x1ux2x2−2wx1x2ux1x2+wx2x2ux1x1. |
Let us denote by ν=(ν1,ν2) the external unit normal vector on Γ and by τ=(−ν2,ν1) the corresponding unit tangent vector. Denoting by the differential operators A1 and A2
A1w=Δw+(1−λ)A1w, A2w=∂Δw∂ν+(1−λ)∂A2w∂τ, |
where
A1w=2ν1ν2wx1x2−ν21wx2x2−ν22wx1x1,A2w=(ν21−ν22)wx1x2+ν1ν2(wx2x2−wx1x1), |
and the constant λ∈(0,12) represents Poisson's ratio.
From the physical point of view, w represents the transversal displacement, and v is the Airy-stress function of the vibrating plate subjected to boundary viscoelastic damping. We see that the memory effect described in integral Eqs (1.4) and (1.5) can be caused by the interaction with another viscoelastic element. The problems (1.1)–(1.6) are interesting not only from the point of view of PDE general theory but also due to its applications in mechanics. This equation is used to predict the shape or deformation of the plate, for example, to understand and design the behavior of the plate in aircraft wings, the support structure of buildings or various mechanical systems. Furthermore, the von Karman plates with memory on the boundary is also widely used in communication and signal processing. In particular, understanding the energy decay that occurs when a signal passes through a boundary can contribute to improving the performance of the communication system.
Recently, some authors have applied the diffusion PDE model to study practical problems such as viral infection, cancer prevention and treatment and online game addiction, and they have achieved good results, see [1,2,3,4]. Fractional order differential equations (FODEs) have attracted considerable attention from researchers due to their applications in various scientific and engineering fields. Since most physical, technical and dynamical problems are influenced by certain boundary conditions, the study of boundary value problems is important. Shah et al. [5] established some sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of solutions to impulsive FODEs with integral boundary condition. Recently, Shah et al. [6] investigated the existence and uniqueness of solutions to nonlinear impulsive FODEs under multipoint boundary conditions. Furthermore, fractional order delay differential equations (FODDEs) play crucial roles in modeling various physical and biological processes and phenomena. FODDEs have a wide range of applications in various fields, including electrodynamics, growth cells, quantum mechanics and astrophysics. Shah et al. [7] considered the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the boundary value problem of variable FODDEs.
In recent decades, many authors [8,9,10,11,12,13] have considered the mathematical analysis of Kirchhoff plates, investigating aspects such as global existence, uniqueness and stability under various boundary feedback conditions. Kang [14] studied the general decay of solutions to the Kirchhoff plates with a memory condition at the boundary. Mustafa and Abusharkh [15] established the general decay rate result for the plate equations with viscoelastic boundary damping. Recently, Al-Mahdi [16] proved the general and optimal decay rate result for the Kirchhoff plate equations with nonlinear damping. This result is a generalization of the work in [14,15,17].
On the other hand, the energy decay of the solutions for the von Karman system has been studied by many authors. In [18,19], the authors proved the stability of the solutions to a von Karman plate with nonlinear boundary feedback. Rivera and Menzala [20] showed the asymptotic behavior of the solution for the following von Karman plates with memory
wtt−hΔwtt+Δ2w−∫t0g(t−s)Δ2w(s)ds=[w,v] in Ω×(0,∞),Δ2v=−[w,w] in Ω×(0,∞), | (1.7) |
where h is a constant representing the thickness. Recently, Kang [21] investigated the general decay rates for the von Karman plate model (1.7) under the more general conditions
g′(t)≤−ζ(t)G(g(t)), t≥0, | (1.8) |
where ζ is a positive nonincreasing differentiable function and G satisfies the suitable conditions. This result improved earlier results in [20,22,23]. Recently, Balegh et al. [24] established the general energy decay result for system (1.7) with nonlinear boundary delay term when g satisfies condition (1.8). The general stability result of the viscoelastic equation, for relaxation function g satisfying condition (1.8), has been investigated in [25,26,27].
For the case α1=α2=0 in (1.1)–(1.6), Park and Park [28] studied the asymptotic behavior of the solutions, provided the resolvent kernels satisfy
ki(0)>0, k′i(t)≤−C1ki(t), k″i(t)≥−C2k′i(t), ∀t≥0, (i=1,2), | (1.9) |
for some positive constants C1 and C2. Kang [29] considered the following generalized condition
ki(0)>0, limt→∞ki(t)=0, k′i(t)≤0, k″i(t)≥H(−k′i(t)), (i=1,2), | (1.10) |
where H is a positive function, with H(0)=H′(0)=0, and H is linear or it is strictly increasing and strictly convex on (0,r], for some 0<r<1. The inequality in (1.10) has been introduced for the first time in [30]. These are weaker conditions on H than those introduced in [30]. Thus, Kang [29] extended the decay result of [28]. Park [31], using the same assumption on the kernel in [29], obtained the general decay result of energy under w0≠0 on one part of the boundary. Recently, Feng and Soufyane [32] showed the general decay of the solution when the initial condition w0=0 on one part of boundary and the resolvent kernels ki satisfy
ki(0)>0, limt→∞ki(t)=0, k′i(t)≤0, k″i(t)≥ξi(t)Gi(−k′i(t)), (i=1,2), | (1.11) |
where ξi(t) are nonincreasing continuous functions and Gi are positive functions, with Gi(0)=G′i(0)=0, and the Gi are linear or strictly increasing and strictly convex on (0,r],r≥−k′i(0).
For problems (1.1)–(1.6), Rivera et al. [33] proved that the solution decays exponentially, provided the resolvent kernels satisfy condition (1.9). Moreover, when the relaxation functions decay polynomially, they showed that the solution decays polynomially. Santos and Soufyane [34] improved the decay result of [33]. They assumed that the resolvent kernels satisfy
ki(0)>0, ki(t)≥0, k′i(t)≤0, k″i(t)≥ηi(t)(−k′i(t)), ∀t≥0, (i=1,2), | (1.12) |
where ηi:R+→R+ are functions satisfying conditions
ηi(t)>0, η′i(t)≤0 and ∫+∞0ηi(t)dt=+∞. |
Motivated by their results, we prove the asymptotic behavior of the solution for system (1.1)–(1.6) when the initial condition w0≠0 on Γ and the resolvent kernels ki satisfy condition (1.11). This condition is more general compared to the previous conditions (1.10) and (1.12). Therefore, these general decay estimates improve the earlier results of [29,31,33,34]. Moreover, using the multiplier method and some properties of convex functions, we obtain the general decay of solution for system (1.1)–(1.6) that depends on the functions ξi and Gi.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present some notations and assumptions needed for our work. In Section 3, we prove the general decay of the solutions for the von Karman plate system with memory condition on the boundary.
In this section, we present some material needed in the proof of our main result. Throughout this paper we denote ||⋅||L2(Ω) and ||⋅||L2(Γ) by ||⋅|| and ||⋅||Γ, respectively. Let us define the bilinear form
a(w,u)=∫Ω{wx1x1ux1x1+wx2x2ux2x2+λ(wx1x1ux2x2+wx2x2ux1x1)+2(1−λ)wx1x2ux1x2}dx. |
We assume that there exists x0∈R2, such that
Γ={x∈Γ:m(x)⋅ν(x)>0}, |
where m(x)=x−x0. The compactness of Γ implies that there exists δ>0, such that
m(x)⋅ν(x)≥δ>0, ∀x∈Γ. | (2.1) |
As shown in [33,34], we use the boundary conditions (1.4) and (1.5) to estimate the terms A1w and A2w. Differentiating (1.4) and (1.5) and applying Volterra's inverse operator, we have
A1w=−α1∂w∂ν−γ1{∂wt∂ν−k1(t)∂w0∂ν+k1(0)∂w∂ν+k′1∗∂w∂ν}, | (2.2) |
A2w=α2w+γ2{wt−k2(t)w0+k2(0)w+k′2∗w}, | (2.3) |
where γi=1hi(0),(i=1,2) and the resolvent kernels ki,(i=1,2) satisfy
ki+1hi(0)h′i∗ki=−1hi(0)h′i, |
where ∗ is the convolution product. Thus, we use boundary conditions (2.2) and (2.3) instead of (1.4) and (1.5).
The following identity will be used later.
Lemma 2.1. ([35]) For any w∈H4(Ω) and u∈H2(Ω), we have
∫Ω(Δ2w)udx=a(w,u)+∫Γ(A2w)u−(A1w)∂u∂νdΓ, | (2.4) |
∫Ω(m⋅∇w)Δ2wdx=a(w,w)+∫Γ[(A2w)(m⋅∇w)−(A1w)∂(m⋅∇w)∂ν]dΓ+12∫Γ(m⋅ν)[w2x1x1+w2x2x2+2λwx1x1wx2x2+2(1−λ)w2x1x2]dΓ. | (2.5) |
We state the relative results of the Airy stress function and von Karman bracket [⋅,⋅].
Lemma 2.2. ([8]) Let w,u be functions in H2(Ω) and v in H20(Ω), where Ω is an open, bounded and connected set of R2 with regular boundary. Then,
∫Ω[w,v]udx=∫Ω[w,u]vdx. | (2.6) |
By differentiating the term h◻w, we obtain the following lemma.
Lemma 2.3. For h,w∈C1([0,∞):R), we have
(h∗w)wt=−12h(t)|w(t)|2+12h′◻w−12ddt[h◻w−(∫t0h(s)ds)|w|2], | (2.7) |
where (h◻w)(t):=∫t0h(t−s)|w(t)−w(s)|2ds.
As in [32,36], we consider the following assumptions on ki (i=1,2).
(A) The resolvent kernels ki:R+→R+ are twice differentiable functions, such that
ki(0)>0, k′i(t)≤0, limt→∞ki(t)=0, ∫∞0ki(s)ds<∞, | (2.8) |
and there exist positive functions Gi∈C1(R+) and the Gi are linear or strictly increasing and strictly convex C2 functions on (0,r], r<1, with Gi(0)=G′i(0)=0, such that
k″i(t)≥ξi(t)Gi(−k′i(t)), ∀t>0, | (2.9) |
where ξi:R+→R+ are nonincreasing differentiable functions.
From (A), we easily see that there exists t0>0 large enough such that
0<−k′i(t0)≤−k′i(t)≤−k′i(0), for t∈[0,t0], | (2.10) |
and
max{ki(t),−k′i(t),k″i(t)}<min{r,G(r)}, for t≥t0, | (2.11) |
where G=min{G1,G2}.
As ξi(t) and −k′i(t) are positive nonincreasing continuous functions and Gi(t) is a positive continuous function, there exist positive constants ai and bi such that
ai≤ξi(t)Gi(−k′i(t))≤bi, for t∈[0,t0]. |
Therefore, for all t∈[0,t0], we obtain
k″i(t)≥ξi(t)Gi(−k′i(t))≥−cik′i(t), | (2.12) |
where ci=−aik′i(0).
The well-posedness of von Karman system plates with boundary conditions of memory type is given by the following theorem.
Theorem 2.1. ([33]) Let ki(i=1,2)∈C2(R+) be such that ki, −k′i, k″i≥0. If the initial conditions (w0,w1)∈(H4(Ω)∩H2(Ω))×H2(Ω) satisfy the compatibility conditions
A1w0+α1∂w0∂ν+γ1∂w1∂ν=0, A2w0−α2w0−γ2w1=0 on Γ, |
then the solution of (1.1)–(1.6) has the following regularity
w∈C1([0,T]:H2(Ω))∩C0([0,T]:H4(Ω)). |
The energy function of system (1.1)–(1.6) is given by
E(t)=12||wt||2+12a(w,w)+14||Δv||2+α12||∂w∂ν||2Γ+γ12k1(t)||∂w∂ν||2Γ +α22||w||2Γ+γ22k2(t)||w||2Γ−γ12∫Γk′1◻∂w∂νdΓ−γ22∫Γk′2◻wdΓ. | (2.13) |
To get a general stability result, the following is needed.
Remark 2.1. 1) If Gi(i=1,2) are strictly convex on (0,r] and Gi(0)=0, then,
Gi(θs)≤θGi(s), s∈(0,r] and 0≤θ≤1. | (2.14) |
2) Let G∗ be the convex conjugate of G in the sense of Young [37], then
G∗(s)=s(G′)−1(s)−G[(G′)−1(s)], if s∈(0,G′(r)], | (2.15) |
and G∗ satisfies the following Young's inequality
ab≤G∗(a)+G(b), if a∈(0,G′(r)], b∈(0,r]. | (2.16) |
3) Let F be a convex function on [c,d], and if ϱ:Ω→[c,d] and p are integrable functions on Ω such that p(x)≥0 and ∫Ωp(x)dx=p0>0, then Jensen's inequality states that
F(1p0∫Ωϱ(x)p(x)dx)≤1p0∫ΩF(ϱ(x))p(x)dx. | (2.17) |
In this section, we study the asymptotic behavior of the solutions for system (1.1)–(1.6). To show the general decay property, we first prove the dissipative property. Multiplying (1.1) by wt and using (2.4), (2.7), Young's inequality and the boundary conditions (2.2) and (2.3), we obtain the following.
Lemma 3.1. ([33]) The energy function E(t) satisfies
E′(t)≤−γ12||∂wt∂ν||2Γ+γ12k′1(t)||∂w∂ν||2Γ−γ12∫Γk″1◻∂w∂νdΓ+γ12k21(t)||∂w0∂ν||2Γ−γ22||wt||2Γ+γ22k′2(t)||w||2Γ−γ22∫Γk″2◻wdΓ+γ22k22(t)||w0||2Γ. | (3.1) |
Since w0≠0 on Γ, Lemma 3.1 says that E(t) may not be nonincreasing. So, we introduce the modified energy functional E(t) by
E(t)=E(t)+γ12||∂w0∂ν||2Γ∫∞tk21(s)ds+γ22||w0||2Γ∫∞tk22(s)ds. | (3.2) |
Then, from (3.1), we have
E′(t)=E′(t)−γ12k21(t)||∂w0∂ν||2Γ−γ22k22(t)||w0||2Γ≤0. | (3.3) |
For suitable choice of N1 and N2, let us introduce the Lyapunov functional
L(t):=N1E(t)+N2Υ(t), |
where
Υ(t):=∫Ω(m⋅∇w+12w)wtdx. |
It is not difficult to see that L(t) satisfies q0E(t)≤L(t)≤q1E(t), for some positive constants q0 and q1.
Lemma 3.2. Under the assumption (A), the functional Υ(t) satisfies
Υ′(t)≤12∫Γ(m⋅ν)|wt|2dΓ−12||wt||2−||Δv||2−12∫Γ(m⋅ν)|Δv|2dΓ −(32−ϵλ0)a(w,w)−(α12−ϵ2)||∂w∂ν||2Γ−(α22−ϵ2)||w||2Γ −(12−ϵλ0δ)∫Γ(m⋅ν)[w2x1x1+w2x2x2+2λwx1x1wx2x2+2(1−λ)w2x1x2]dΓ +4γ21Cϵ(||∂wt∂ν||2Γ+k21(t)||∂w∂ν||2Γ+k21(t)||∂w0∂ν||2Γ+C(δ1)∫Γg1◻∂w∂νdΓ) +4γ22Cϵ(||wt||2Γ+k22(t)||w||2Γ+k22(t)||w0||2Γ+C(δ2)∫Γg2◻wdΓ), | (3.4) |
for any 0<δi<1 (i=1,2), where
C(δi)=∫∞0(−k′i(s))2gi(s)ds and gi(t)=k″i(t)−δik′i(t)>0. | (3.5) |
Proof. According to [33,34], from (2.5) and (2.6), we obtain
Υ′(t)=12∫Γ(m⋅ν)|wt|2dΓ−12||wt||2−||Δv||2−12∫Γ(m⋅ν)|Δv|2dΓ −32a(w,w)+∫Γ(A1w)∂∂ν(m⋅∇w+12w)dΓ−∫Γ(A2w)(m⋅∇w+12w)dΓ −12∫Γ(m⋅ν)[w2x1x1+w2x2x2+2λwx1x1wx2x2+2(1−λ)w2x1x2]dΓ. | (3.6) |
Applying Young's inequality, we get
|∫Γ(A1w)∂∂ν(m⋅∇w+12w)dΓ|≤ϵ||∂∂ν(m⋅∇w)||2Γ+Cϵ||A1w+α1∂w∂ν||2Γ−(α12−ϵ2)||∂w∂ν||2Γ, | (3.7) |
|−∫Γ(A2w)(m⋅∇w+12w)dΓ|≤ϵ||m⋅∇w||2Γ+Cϵ||A2w−α2w||2Γ−(α22−ϵ2)||w||2Γ, | (3.8) |
where ϵ is a positive constant. Using the trace theory and the fact m⋅ν≥δ on Γ, we obtain
||∂∂ν(m⋅∇w)||2Γ+||m⋅∇w||2Γ ≤λ0a(w,w)+λ0δ∫Γ(m⋅ν)[w2x1x1+w2x2x2+2λwx1x1wx2x2+2(1−λ)w2x1x2]dΓ, | (3.9) |
where λ0 is a positive constant. Noting that
(k′2∗w)(t)=w(t)[k2(t)−k2(0)]−∫t0k′2(t−s)(w(t)−w(s))ds, |
the boundary condition (2.3) can be written as
A2w−α2w=γ2{wt+k2(t)w−k2(t)w0−∫t0k′2(t−s)(w(t)−w(s))ds}. | (3.10) |
Similarly, we can show that
A1w+α1∂w∂ν=−γ1{∂wt∂ν+k1(t)∂w∂ν−k1(t)∂w0∂ν−∫t0k′1(t−s)(∂w(t)∂ν−∂w(s)∂ν)ds}. | (3.11) |
Using (3.6)–(3.11), we arrive at
Υ′(t)≤12∫Γ(m⋅ν)|wt|2dΓ−12||wt||2−||Δv||2−12∫Γ(m⋅ν)|Δv|2dΓ−(32−ϵλ0)a(w,w)−(α12−ϵ2)||∂w∂ν||2Γ−(α22−ϵ2)||w||2Γ−(12−ϵλ0δ)∫Γ(m⋅ν)[w2x1x1+w2x2x2+2λwx1x1wx2x2+2(1−λ)w2x1x2]dΓ+4γ21Cϵ(||∂wt∂ν||2Γ+k21(t)||∂w∂ν||2Γ+k21(t)||∂w0∂ν||2Γ+||−∫t0k′1(t−s)(∂w(t)∂ν−∂w(s)∂ν)ds||2Γ) +4γ22Cϵ(||wt||2Γ+k22(t)||w||2Γ+k22(t)||w0||2Γ+||−∫t0k′2(t−s)(w(t)−w(s))ds||2Γ). | (3.12) |
Using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and (3.5), we have (see details in [25,27])
||−∫t0k′2(t−s)(w(t)−w(s))ds||2Γ≤∫t0(−k′2(s))2g2(s)ds∫Γ∫t0(k″2(t−s)−δ2k′2(t−s))|w(t)−w(s)|2dsdΓ≤C(δ2)∫Γg2◻wdΓ, | (3.13) |
and
||−∫t0k′1(t−s)(∂w(t)∂ν−∂w(s)∂ν)ds||2Γ≤C(δ1)∫Γg1◻∂w∂νdΓ. | (3.14) |
Substituting (3.13) and (3.14) into (3.12), we have (3.4).
Next, we define the functionals
K1(t)=∫t0f1(t−s)||∂w(s)∂ν||2Γds and K2(t)=∫t0f2(t−s)||w(s)||2Γds, |
where fi(t)=∫∞t(−k′i(s))ds, i=1,2.
Lemma 3.3. Under the assumption (A), the functionals K1(t) and K2(t) satisfy the estimates
K′1(t)≤3k1(0)||∂w∂ν||2Γ+12∫Γk′1◻∂w∂νdΓ, | (3.15) |
K′2(t)≤3k2(0)||w||2Γ+12∫Γk′2◻wdΓ. | (3.16) |
Proof. Taking the derivative of the functional K2(t) and using the fact f′2(t)=k′2(t), we find that
K′2(t)=f2(0)||w||2Γ+∫t0k′2(t−s)||w(s)||2Γds=∫t0k′2(t−s)||w(s)−w(t)||2Γds+2∫Γw(t)∫t0k′2(t−s)(w(s)−w(t))dsdΓ+k2(t)||w||2Γ. | (3.17) |
Using Young's inequality and (2.8), we obtain
2∫Γw(t)∫t0k′2(t−s)(w(s)−w(t))dsdΓ≤2k2(0)||w||2Γ+∫t0−k′2(s)ds2k2(0)∫Γ∫t0(−k′2(t−s))|w(s)−w(t)|2dsdΓ≤2k2(0)||w||2Γ−12∫Γk′2◻wdΓ. | (3.18) |
From (3.17) and (3.18), we get the estimate (3.16). Similarly, we can obtain the estimate (3.15).
Lemma 3.4. Suppose that the assumption (A) holds. Then, for N1,N2>0 large enough, there exist positive constants β1 and β2, such that
L′(t)≤−β1(||wt||2+a(w,w)+||Δv||2)+β2(k21(t)||∂w0∂ν||2Γ+k22(t)||w0||2Γ)−γ14∫Γk′1◻∂w∂νdΓ−(α12+4γ1k1(0))||∂w∂ν||2Γ−γ24∫Γk′2◻wdΓ−(α22+4γ2k2(0))||w||2Γ, for t≥t0, | (3.19) |
where t0 was introduced in (2.10).
Proof. Combining (3.1), (3.4) and (3.5), we see that
L′(t)≤−N22||wt||2−N2||Δv||2−γ2(N12−4γ2CϵN2−RN22γ2)||wt||2Γ−γ1(N12−4γ1CϵN2)||∂wt∂ν||2Γ−N2(32−ϵλ0)a(w,w)−N2(α12−ϵ2−4γ21Cϵk21(t))||∂w∂ν||2Γ−N2(α22−ϵ2−4γ22Cϵk22(t))||w||2Γ−N2(12−ϵλ0δ)∫Γ(m⋅ν)[w2x1x1+w2x2x2+2λwx1x1wx2x2+2(1−λ)w2x1x2]dΓ−γ1δ1N12∫Γk′1◻∂w∂νdΓ−γ1(N12−4γ1CϵC(δ1)N2)∫Γg1◻∂w∂νdΓ−γ2δ2N12∫Γk′2◻wdΓ−γ2(N12−4γ2CϵC(δ2)N2)∫Γg2◻wdΓ+k21(t)(γ1N12+4γ21CϵN2)||∂w0∂ν||2Γ+k22(t)(γ2N12+4γ22CϵN2)||w0||2Γ, |
where R=max{m(x)⋅ν(x):x∈Γ}. We first fix ϵ>0 small such that
32−ϵλ0>0, αi2−ϵ2>0, and 12−ϵλ0δ>0, i=1,2. |
Next, we apply the fact limt→∞ki(t)=0 (i=1,2) and choose N2 large enough so that
N2(αi2−ϵ2−4γ2iCϵk2i(t))>αi2+4γiki(0), i=1,2, |
for all t>t0. From (2.8), (2.9) and (3.5), we have
−δik′i(t)≤k″i(t)−δik′i(t)=gi(t) ⇒ −δik′i(t)gi(t)≤1 ⇒ δi(−k′i(t))2gi(t)≤−k′i(t), i=1,2. | (3.20) |
Integrating (3.20) and using (2.8), we obtain
δiC(δi)=δi∫∞0(−k′i(s))2gi(s)ds≤ki(0), i=1,2. |
By the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem, we find that δiC(δi) →0 as δi→0. Then, there exists 0<δ0<1 such that, if δi<δ0, then 4δiγiCϵC(δi)N2<18 (i=1,2). Finally, taking N1 large enough so that
N1>max{8γ1CϵN2, (8γ2Cϵ+Rγ2)N2, 12δ0}, |
and choosing δi=12N1<δ0 (i=1,2), we have the estimate (3.19).
Now, we are ready to prove our main result.
Theorem 3.1. Suppose that the assumption (A) holds. Then there exist positive constants ϵ0,σ1,σ2,κ1 and κ2 such that the energy functional satisfies, for all t≥t0,
E(t)≤σ1{1+∫tt0eσ2∫st0ξ(η)dη(k21(s)||∂w0∂ν||2Γ+k22(s)||w0||2Γ)ds}e−σ2∫tt0ξ(s)ds, if G islinear, | (3.21) |
E(t)≤κ1H−11(κ2(1+||∂w0∂ν||2Γ(∫tt0G(k1(s))ξ(s)ds)+||w0||2Γ(∫tt0G(k2(s))ξ(s)ds))tξ(t))−γ12||∂w0∂ν||2Γ(∫∞tk21(s)ds)−γ22||w0||2Γ(∫∞tk22(s)ds), if G isnonlinear, | (3.22) |
where H1(t)=tG′(ϵ0t),G(t)=min{G1(t),G2(t)} and ξ(t)=min{ξ1(t),ξ2(t)}.
Proof. From (2.13) and (3.19), there exist positive constants β3 and β4 such that, for t≥t0
L′(t)≤−β3E(t)−β4(∫Γk′1◻∂w∂νdΓ+∫Γk′2◻wdΓ)+β2(k21(t)||∂w0∂ν||2Γ+k22(t)||w0||2Γ). | (3.23) |
Applying (2.12) and (3.1), we see that, for all t≥t0
β4∫Γ∫t00(−k′1(s)|∂w(t)∂ν−∂w(t−s)∂ν|2−k′2(s)|w(t)−w(t−s)|2)dsdΓ≤β4c0∫Γ∫t00(k″1(s)|∂w(t)∂ν−∂w(t−s)∂ν|2+k″2(s)|w(t)−w(t−s)|2)dsdΓ≤β4c0γ0(γ1k21(t)||∂w0∂ν||2Γ+γ2k22(t)||w0||2Γ−2E′(t)), | (3.24) |
where c0=min{c1,c2} and γ0=min{γ1,γ2}.
Let Φ(t)=L(t)+2β4c0γ0E(t), which is equivalent to E(t). Using (3.23) and (3.24), we obtain for all t≥t0
Φ′(t)≤−β3E(t)+β5(k21(t)||∂w0∂ν||2Γ+k22(t)||w0||2Γ)−β4(∫Γ∫tt0k′1(s)|∂w(t)∂ν−∂w(t−s)∂ν|2dsdΓ+∫Γ∫tt0k′2(s)|w(t)−w(t−s)|2dsdΓ), | (3.25) |
where β5=max{β2+β4γ1c0γ0, β2+β4γ2c0γ0}.
We consider the following two cases.
1) G is linear: Multiplying (3.25) by the nonincreasing function ξ(t) and using (2.9) and (3.1), we have
ξ(t)Φ′(t)≤−β3ξ(t)E(t)+β5ξ(t)(k21(t)||∂w0∂ν||2Γ+k22(t)||w0||2Γ)+β4(∫Γ∫tt0k″1(s)|∂w(t)∂ν−∂w(t−s)∂ν|2dsdΓ+∫Γ∫tt0k″2(s)|w(t)−w(t−s)|2dsdΓ)≤−β3ξ(t)E(t)+β6(k21(t)||∂w0∂ν||2Γ+k22(t)||w0||2Γ)−2β4γ0E′(t), ∀t≥t0, |
where β6=max{β5ξ0+β4γ1γ0, β5ξ0+β4γ2γ0} and ξ(t)≤ξ0, for some ξ0>0. This gives
(ξ(t)Φ(t)+2β4γ0E(t))′≤−β3ξ(t)E(t)+β6(k21(t)||∂w0∂ν||2Γ+k22(t)||w0||2Γ), ∀t≥t0, |
where ξ(t) is a nonincreasing function. Hence, using the fact that I(t)=ξ(t)Φ(t)+2β4γ0E(t)∼E(t), we deduce that
I′(t)≤−β7ξ(t)I(t)+β6(k21(t)||∂w0∂ν||2Γ+k22(t)||w0||2Γ), ∀t≥t0, | (3.26) |
where β7 is a positive constant. We introduce
J(t)=I(t)−β6e−β7∫tt0ξ(s)ds(∫tt0k21(s)eβ7∫st0ξ(η)dηds||∂w0∂ν||2Γ+∫tt0k22(s)eβ7∫st0ξ(η)dηds||w0||2Γ). | (3.27) |
From (3.26), we have
J′(t)≤−β7ξ(t)J(t), ∀t≥t0. |
Integrating this over (t0,t), we obtain
J(t)≤J(t0)e−β7∫tt0ξ(s)ds, ∀t≥t0. |
Using the fact that I(t)∼E(t) and (3.27), we get the estimate (3.21).
2) G is nonlinear: First, we construct the functional
Ψ(t)=L(t)+γ1K1(t)+γ2K2(t), |
which is nonnegative. From (2.13), (3.15), (3.16) and (3.19), we obtain
Ψ′(t)≤−ρ0E(t)+β2(k21(t)||∂w0∂ν||2Γ+k22(t)||w0||2Γ), |
where ρ0 is some positive constant. Integrating this over (t0,t), we arrive at
ρ0∫tt0E(s)ds≤Ψ(t0)+β2(k1(0)||∂w0∂ν||2Γ∫tt0k1(s)ds+k2(0)||w0||2Γ∫tt0k2(s)ds). |
Therefore, from (2.8), we conclude that
∫tt0E(s)ds<∞. |
Then, we define ζ1(t) and ζ2(t) by, for constants θ1 and θ2∈(0,1),
ζ1(t):=θ1∫tt0||∂w(t)∂ν−∂w(t−s)∂ν||2Γds, ζ2(t):=θ2∫tt0||w(t)−w(t−s)||2Γds∈(0,1). |
Using (2.9), (2.14), (2.17) and the fact that ξ1(t) is a positive nonincreasing function, we find that
−∫tt0k′1(s)||∂w(t)∂ν−∂w(t−s)∂ν||2Γds≤∫tt0G−11(k″1(s)ξ1(s))||∂w(t)∂ν−∂w(t−s)∂ν||2Γds≤ζ1(t)θ1G−11(θ1∫tt0k″1(s)ξ1(s)ζ1(t)||∂w(t)∂ν−∂w(t−s)∂ν||2Γds)≤1θ1G−11(θ1∫tt0k″1(s)ξ1(s)||∂w(t)∂ν−∂w(t−s)∂ν||2Γds)≤1θ1G−11(1ξ1(t)∫tt0k″1(s)||∂w(t)∂ν−∂w(t−s)∂ν||2Γds)≤1θ1G−11(1ξ(t)∫Γk″1◻∂w∂νdΓ), | (3.28) |
where ξ(t)=min{ξ1(t),ξ2(t)}.
Similarly, we can prove that
−∫tt0k′2(s)||w(t)−w(t−s)||2Γds≤1θ2G−12(1ξ(t)∫Γk″2◻wdΓ). | (3.29) |
Combining (2.8), (3.2), (3.25), (3.28) and (3.29), we see that, for all t≥t0,
Φ′(t)≤−β3E(t)+β8(k1(t)||∂w0∂ν||2Γ+k2(t)||w0||2Γ)+β4θ1G−11(1ξ(t)∫Γk″1◻∂w∂νdΓ)+β4θ2G−12(1ξ(t)∫Γk″2◻wdΓ), | (3.30) |
where β8=max{β5k1(0)+β3γ12∫∞0k1(s)ds, β5k2(0)+β3γ22∫∞0k2(s)ds}. Now, for ϵ0<r, we define the functional
R(t):=Φ(t)G′(ϵ0E(t)E(0)), |
where E(t) is the modified energy given in (3.2). Using (2.11), (2.15), (2.16), (3.1), (3.3), (3.30) and the fact that E′≤0, G′>0 and G″>0, we obtain for all t≥t0
R′(t)≤−β3G′(ϵ0E(t)E(0))E(t)+β8||∂w0∂ν||2ΓG′(ϵ0E(t)E(0))k1(t)+β8||w0||2ΓG′(ϵ0E(t)E(0))k2(t)+β4θ1G′(ϵ0E(t)E(0))G−1(1ξ(t)∫Γk″1◻∂w∂νdΓ)+β4θ2G′(ϵ0E(t)E(0))G−1(1ξ(t)∫Γk″2◻wdΓ) ≤−[β3E(0)−(β8||∂w0∂ν||2Γ+β8||w0||2Γ+2β4θ0)ϵ0]E(t)E(0)G′(ϵ0E(t)E(0))+β8||∂w0∂ν||2ΓG(k1(t))+β8||w0||2ΓG(k2(t))+β4θ0ξ(t)(∫Γk″1◻∂w∂νdΓ+∫Γk″2◻wdΓ) ≤−[β3E(0)−(β8||∂w0∂ν||2Γ+β8||w0||2Γ+2β4θ0)ϵ0]E(t)E(0)G′(ϵ0E(t)E(0))+β8||∂w0∂ν||2ΓG(k1(t))+β8||w0||2ΓG(k2(t))−2β4θ0γ0ξ(t)E′(t), |
where θ0=min{θ1, θ2} and γ0=min{γ1, γ2}. Choosing ϵ0 such that ρ1=β3E(0)−(β8||∂w0∂ν||2Γ+β8||w0||2Γ+2β4θ0)ϵ0>0, we have
R′(t)≤−ρ1E(t)E(0)G′(ϵ0E(t)E(0))+β8||∂w0∂ν||2ΓG(k1(t))+β8||w0||2ΓG(k2(t))−2β4θ0γ0ξ(t)E′(t). |
Then, multiplying this by ξ(t), we get
ξ(t)R′(t)≤−ρ1ξ(t)E(t)E(0)G′(ϵ0E(t)E(0))+β8(||w0||2ΓG(k2(t))+||∂w0∂ν||2ΓG(k1(t)))ξ(t)−2β4θ0γ0E′(t). | (3.31) |
Taking F(t)=ξ(t)R(t)+2β4θ0γ0E(t) and using (3.31) and ξ′≤0, we arrive at
F′(t)≤−ρ1ξ(t)H1(E(t)E(0))+β8(||∂w0∂ν||2ΓG(k1(t))+||w0||2ΓG(k2(t)))ξ(t), ∀t≥t0, | (3.32) |
where H1(t)=tG′(ϵ0t). Applying (3.32) and the fact that ξ′≤0, E′≤0 and H′1≥0, we find that
[tξ(t)H1(E(t)E(0))]′≤ξ(t)H1(E(t)E(0))≤−1ρ1F′(t)+β8ρ1(||∂w0∂ν||2ΓG(k1(t))+||w0||2ΓG(k2(t)))ξ(t), ∀t≥t0. |
Integrating this over (t0,t), we see that
tξ(t)H1(E(t)E(0))≤t0ξ(t0)H1(E(t0)E(0))+1ρ1F(t0)+β8ρ1∫tt0(||∂w0∂ν||2ΓG(k1(s))+||w0||2ΓG(k2(s)))ξ(s)ds≤ρ2(1+∫tt0(||∂w0∂ν||2ΓG(k1(s))+||w0||2ΓG(k2(s)))ξ(s)ds), |
where ρ2=max{t0ξ(t0)H1(E(t0)E(0))+1ρ1F(t0), β8ρ1}. Therefore, we conclude that
E(t)≤E(0)H−11(ρ2(1+∫tt0(||∂w0∂ν||2ΓG(k1(s))+||w0||2ΓG(k2(s)))ξ(s)ds)tξ(t)), ∀t≥t0. |
Hence, applying (3.2), (3.22) is established.
Examples. We provide examples to explain the decay of energy [32,36].
1) For k′1(t)=k′2(t)=−e−tq with 0<q<1, we obtain k″i(t)=Gi(−k′i(t))(i=1,2), where G1(t)=G2(t)=qt[ln(1t)]1q−1. Since
G′1(t)=G′2(t)=(1−q)+qln(1q)[ln(1t)]1q and G″1(t)=G″2(t)=(1−q)[ln(1q)+1q][ln(1t)]1q+1, |
the functions G1 and G2 satisfy the condition (2.9) on (0,r] for any 0<r<1.
2) Let k′i(t)=−ai(1+t)2, where ai>0,(i=1,2), be chosen so that assumption (A) holds. We choose a=min{a1,a2}, then k″i(t)=biGi(−k′i(t)). We select b=min{b1,b2}, G=min{G1,G2} and ξ(t)=min{ξ1(t),ξ2(t)}, then G(t)=t32,ξ(t)=b.
The von Karman plates with memory on the boundary is also widely used in communication and signal processing. In particular, understanding the energy decay that occurs when a signal passes through a boundary can contribute to improving the performance of the communication system. This type of equation plays an important role in explaining various physical phenomena in the real world. In this paper, we study the von Karman plate system with general type of relaxation functions on the boundary. Here, we consider the resolvent kernels ki(i=1,2), namely k″i(t)≥−ξi(t)Gi(−k′i(t)), where Gi are convex and increasing functions near the origin and ξi are positive nonincreasing functions. Using some properties of convex functions without the assumption that initial value w0≡0 on the boundary, we prove the general decay rate result. These general decay estimates improve earlier results in the literature.
The author declares she has not used Artificial Intelligence(AI) tools in the creation of this article.
The author would like to thank the referee for a careful reading of the manuscript and valuable comments. This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2021R1I1A3042239).
The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
[1] |
A. Rezounenko, Viral infection model with diffusion and distributed delay: finite-dimensional global attractor, Qual. Theory Dyn. Syst., 22 (2023), 11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12346-022-00707-6 doi: 10.1007/s12346-022-00707-6
![]() |
[2] | K. H. Zhao, Global stability of a novel nonlinear diffusion online game addiction model with unsustainable control, AIMS Mathematics, 7 (2022), 20752–20766. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20221137 |
[3] |
K. H. Zhao, Probing the oscillatory behavior of internet game addiction via diffusion PDE model, Axioms, 11 (2022), 649. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11110649 doi: 10.3390/axioms11110649
![]() |
[4] |
K. H. Zhao, Attractor of a nonlinear hybrid reaction-diffusion model of neuroendocrine transdifferentiation of human prostate cancer cells with time-lags, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), 14426–14448. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023737 doi: 10.3934/math.2023737
![]() |
[5] |
K. Shah, T. Abdeljawad, A. Ali, M. A. Alqudah, Investigation of integral boundary value problem with impulsive behavior involving non-singular derivative, Fractals, 30 (2022), 2240204. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218348x22402046 doi: 10.1142/s0218348x22402046
![]() |
[6] |
K. Shah, B. Abdalla, T. Abdeljawad, R. Gul, Analysis of multipoint impulsive problem of fractional-order differential equations, Bound. Value Probl., 2023 (2023), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-022-01688-w doi: 10.1186/s13661-022-01688-w
![]() |
[7] |
K. Shah, G. Ali, K. J. Ansari, T. Abdeljawad, M. Meganathan, B. Abdalla, On qualitative analysis of boundary value problem of variable order fractional delay differential equations, Bound. Value Probl., 2023 (2023), 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-023-01728-z doi: 10.1186/s13661-023-01728-z
![]() |
[8] |
I. Chueshov, I. Lasiecka, Global attractors for von Karman evolutions with a nonlinear boundary dissipation, J. Differ. Equations, 198 (2004), 196–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2003.08.008 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2003.08.008
![]() |
[9] |
A. Favini, M. Horn, I. Lasiecka, D. Tataru, Global existence, uniqueness and regularity of solutions to a von Karman system with nonlinear boundary dissipation, Differ. Integral Equ., 9 (1996), 267–294. https://doi.org/10.57262/die/1367603346 doi: 10.57262/die/1367603346
![]() |
[10] |
M. A. J. Silva, J. E. M. Rivera, R. Racke, On a class of nonlinear viscoelastic Kirchhoff plates: well-posedness and general decay rates, Appl. Math. Optim., 73 (2016), 165–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-015-9298-0 doi: 10.1007/s00245-015-9298-0
![]() |
[11] |
E. H. G. Tavares, M. A. J. Silva, T. F. Ma, Sharp decay rates for a class of nonlinear viscoelastic plate models, Commun. Contemp. Math., 20 (2018), 1750010. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219199717500109 doi: 10.1142/S0219199717500109
![]() |
[12] | V. Komornik, On the nonlinear boundary stabilization of Kirchhoff plates, NoDEA-Nonlinear Diff., 1 (1994), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01194984 |
[13] | M. L. Santos, J. Ferreira, D. C. Pereira, C. A. Raposo, Global existence and stability for wave equation of Kirchhoff type with memory condition at the boundary, Nonlinear Anal. Theor., 54 (2003), 959–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-546X(03)00121-4 |
[14] |
J. R. Kang, General decay for Kirchhoff plates with a boundary condition of memory type, Bound. Value Probl., 2012 (2012), 129. https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-2770-2012-129 doi: 10.1186/1687-2770-2012-129
![]() |
[15] |
M. I. Mustafa, G. A. Abusharkh, Plate equations with viscoelastic boundary damping, Indagat. Math., 26 (2015), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indag.2014.09.005 doi: 10.1016/j.indag.2014.09.005
![]() |
[16] |
A. M. Al-Mahdi, Optimal decay result for Kirchhoff plate equations with nonlinear damping and very general type of relaxation functions, Bound. Value Probl., 2019 (2019), 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-019-1196-y doi: 10.1186/s13661-019-1196-y
![]() |
[17] |
M. I. Mustafa, Energy decay of dissipative plate equations with memory-type boundary conditions, Asymptotic Anal., 100 (2016), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.3233/ASY-161385 doi: 10.3233/ASY-161385
![]() |
[18] |
M. A. Horn, I. Lasiecka, Uniform decay of weak solutions to a von Karman plate with nonlinear boundary dissipation, Differ. Integral Equ., 7 (1994), 885–908. https://doi.org/10.57262/die/1370267712 doi: 10.57262/die/1370267712
![]() |
[19] |
M. A. Horn, I. Lasiecka, Global stabilization of a dynamic von Karman plate with nonlinear boundary feedback, Appl. Math. Optim., 31 (1995), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01182557 doi: 10.1007/BF01182557
![]() |
[20] | J. E. M. Rivera, G. P. Menzala, Decay rates of solutions to a von Karman system for viscoelastic plates with memory, Q. Appl. Math., 57 (1999), 181–200. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43638279 |
[21] |
J. R. Kang, General decay rates for a von Karman plate model with memory, Z. Angew. Math. Phys., 73 (2022), 243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-022-01880-z doi: 10.1007/s00033-022-01880-z
![]() |
[22] |
C. A. Raposo, M. L. Santos, General decay to a von Karman system with memory, Nonlinear Anal. Theor., 74 (2011), 937–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2010.09.047 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2010.09.047
![]() |
[23] |
J. R. Kang, A general stability for a von Karman system with memory, Bound. Value Probl., 2015 (2015), 204. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-015-0466-6 doi: 10.1186/s13661-015-0466-6
![]() |
[24] |
M. Balegh, B. Chentouf, B. Feng, Z. Hajjej, A general stability result for a von Karman system with memory and nonlinear boundary delay term, Appl. Math. Lett., 138 (2023), 108512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2022.108512 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2022.108512
![]() |
[25] |
K. P. Jin, J. Liang, T. J. Xiao, Coupled second order evolution equations with fading memory: optimal energy decay rate, J. Differ. Equations, 257 (2014), 1501–1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDE.2014.05.018 doi: 10.1016/J.JDE.2014.05.018
![]() |
[26] |
M. I. Mustafa, General decay result for nonlinear viscoelastic equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 457 (2018), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.08.019 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.08.019
![]() |
[27] |
M. I. Mustafa, Optimal decay rates for the viscoelastic wave equation, Math. Method Appl. Sci., 41 (2018), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.4604 doi: 10.1002/mma.4604
![]() |
[28] |
J. Y. Park, S. H. Park, Uniform decay for a von karman plate equation with a boundary memory condition, Math. Method. Appl. Sci., 28 (2005), 2225–2240. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.663 doi: 10.1002/mma.663
![]() |
[29] |
J. R. Kang, General stability for a von Karman plate system with memory boundary conditions, Bound. Value Probl., 2015 (2015), 167. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-015-0431-4 doi: 10.1186/s13661-015-0431-4
![]() |
[30] | F. Alabau-Boussouira, P. Cannarsa, A general method for proving sharp energy decay rates for memory dissipative evolution equations, CR Math., 347 (2009), 867–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2009.05.011 |
[31] |
S. H. Park, General decay of a von Karman plate equation with memory on the bounary, Comput. Math. Appl., 75 (2018), 3067–3080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2018.01.032 doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2018.01.032
![]() |
[32] |
B. Feng, A. Soufyane, New general decay results for a von Karman plate equation with memory-type boundary conditions, Discrete Cont. Dyn., 40 (2020), 1757–1774. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2020092 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020092
![]() |
[33] |
J. E. M. Rivera, H. P. Oquendo, M. L. Santos, Asymptotic behavior to a von Karman plate with boundary memory conditions, Nonlinear Anal. Theor., 62 (2005), 1183–1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2005.04.025 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2005.04.025
![]() |
[34] |
M. L. Santos, A. Soufyane, General decay to a von Karman plate system with memory boundary conditions, Differ. Integral Equ., 24 (2011), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.57262/die/1356019045 doi: 10.57262/die/1356019045
![]() |
[35] | J. E. Lagnese, Boundary stabilization of thin plates, Philadelphia: SIAM, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611970821 |
[36] |
A. M. Al-Mahdi, Optimal decay result for Kirchhoff plate equations with nonlinear damping and very general type of relaxation functions, Bound. Value Probl., 2019 (2019), 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-019-1196-y doi: 10.1186/s13661-019-1196-y
![]() |
[37] | V. I. Arnold, Mathematical methods of classical mechanics, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2063-1 |