Research article

Distance measures of picture fuzzy sets and interval-valued picture fuzzy sets with their applications

  • Picture fuzzy sets (PFSs) are a versatile generalization of fuzzy sets and intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs), providing a robust framework for modeling imprecise, uncertain, and inconsistent information across various fields. As an advanced extension of PFSs, interval-valued picture fuzzy sets (IvPFSs) offer superior capabilities for handling incomplete and indeterminate information in various practical applications. Distance measures have always been an important topic in fuzzy sets and their variants. Some existing distance measures for PFSs have shown limitations and may yield counterintuitive results under certain conditions. Furthermore, there are currently few studies on distance measures for IvPFSs. To solve these problems, in this paper we devised a series of novel distance measures between PFSs and IvPFSs inspired by the Hellinger distance. Specifically, all the distance measures were divided into two parts: One considered the positive membership degree, neutral membership degree and negative membership degree, and the other added the refusal membership degree. Moreover, the proposed distance measures met some important properties, including boundedness, non-degeneracy, symmetry, and consistency, but also showed superiority compared to the existing measures, as confirmed through numerical comparisons. Finally, the proposed distance measures were validated in pattern recognition and medical diagnosis applications, indicating that the proposed distance measures can deliver credible, reasonable results, particularly in similar cases.

    Citation: Sijia Zhu, Zhe Liu. Distance measures of picture fuzzy sets and interval-valued picture fuzzy sets with their applications[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 29817-29848. doi: 10.3934/math.20231525

    Related Papers:

    [1] Hengxiao Qi, Muhammad Yussouf, Sajid Mehmood, Yu-Ming Chu, Ghulam Farid . Fractional integral versions of Hermite-Hadamard type inequality for generalized exponentially convexity. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6030-6042. doi: 10.3934/math.2020386
    [2] Yu-Pei Lv, Ghulam Farid, Hafsa Yasmeen, Waqas Nazeer, Chahn Yong Jung . Generalization of some fractional versions of Hadamard inequalities via exponentially (α,hm)-convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 8978-8999. doi: 10.3934/math.2021521
    [3] Moquddsa Zahra, Dina Abuzaid, Ghulam Farid, Kamsing Nonlaopon . On Hadamard inequalities for refined convex functions via strictly monotone functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(11): 20043-20057. doi: 10.3934/math.20221096
    [4] Lanxin Chen, Junxian Zhang, Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Imran Ahmed, Shumaila Waheed, Lishuang Pan . Fractional integral inequalities for h-convex functions via Caputo-Fabrizio operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 6377-6389. doi: 10.3934/math.2021374
    [5] Shuang-Shuang Zhou, Saima Rashid, Muhammad Aslam Noor, Khalida Inayat Noor, Farhat Safdar, Yu-Ming Chu . New Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for exponentially convex functions and applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6874-6901. doi: 10.3934/math.2020441
    [6] Maryam Saddiqa, Saleem Ullah, Ferdous M. O. Tawfiq, Jong-Suk Ro, Ghulam Farid, Saira Zainab . k-Fractional inequalities associated with a generalized convexity. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 28540-28557. doi: 10.3934/math.20231460
    [7] Muhammad Tariq, Asif Ali Shaikh, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, Jessada Tariboon . Some novel refinements of Hermite-Hadamard and Pachpatte type integral inequalities involving a generalized preinvex function pertaining to Caputo-Fabrizio fractional integral operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 25572-25610. doi: 10.3934/math.20231306
    [8] Eze R. Nwaeze, Muhammad Adil Khan, Ali Ahmadian, Mohammad Nazir Ahmad, Ahmad Kamil Mahmood . Fractional inequalities of the Hermite–Hadamard type for m-polynomial convex and harmonically convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1889-1904. doi: 10.3934/math.2021115
    [9] Hong Yang, Shahid Qaisar, Arslan Munir, Muhammad Naeem . New inequalities via Caputo-Fabrizio integral operator with applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 19391-19412. doi: 10.3934/math.2023989
    [10] Muhammad Imran Asjad, Waqas Ali Faridi, Mohammed M. Al-Shomrani, Abdullahi Yusuf . The generalization of Hermite-Hadamard type Inequality with exp-convexity involving non-singular fractional operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(4): 7040-7055. doi: 10.3934/math.2022392
  • Picture fuzzy sets (PFSs) are a versatile generalization of fuzzy sets and intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs), providing a robust framework for modeling imprecise, uncertain, and inconsistent information across various fields. As an advanced extension of PFSs, interval-valued picture fuzzy sets (IvPFSs) offer superior capabilities for handling incomplete and indeterminate information in various practical applications. Distance measures have always been an important topic in fuzzy sets and their variants. Some existing distance measures for PFSs have shown limitations and may yield counterintuitive results under certain conditions. Furthermore, there are currently few studies on distance measures for IvPFSs. To solve these problems, in this paper we devised a series of novel distance measures between PFSs and IvPFSs inspired by the Hellinger distance. Specifically, all the distance measures were divided into two parts: One considered the positive membership degree, neutral membership degree and negative membership degree, and the other added the refusal membership degree. Moreover, the proposed distance measures met some important properties, including boundedness, non-degeneracy, symmetry, and consistency, but also showed superiority compared to the existing measures, as confirmed through numerical comparisons. Finally, the proposed distance measures were validated in pattern recognition and medical diagnosis applications, indicating that the proposed distance measures can deliver credible, reasonable results, particularly in similar cases.



    Convex functions has applications in almost all branches of mathematics for example in mathematical analysis, optimization theory and mathematical statistics etc. A convex function can be expressed and visualized in many different ways which further provide the motivation and encouragement for defining new concepts. Let us recall its definition as follows:

    A function f:JRR is said to be convex, if

    f(tx+(1t)y)tf(x)+(1t)f(y), (1.1)

    holds for all x,yJ and t[0,1]. Likewise f is concave if (f) is convex.

    A convex function is generalized in different forms, one of the generalization is the exponentially (θ,hm)-convex function. Farid and Mahreen [11] introduced exponentially (θ,hm)-convex functions as follows:

    Definition 1.1. Let JR be an interval containing (0,1) and let h:JR be a non-negative function. For fix t(0,1), (θ,m)(0,1]2 and ηR. A function f:[0,b]R is called exponentially (θ,hm)-convex function, if f is non-negative and for all x,y[0,b] one has

    f(tx+m(1t)y)h(tθ)f(x)eηx+mh(1tθ)f(y)eηy. (1.2)

    Remark 1.2. By selecting suitable function h and particular values of parameter m and η, the above definition produces the functions comprise in the following remark:

    (i) By setting η=0, (θ,hm)-convex function [12] can be obtained.

    (ii) By taking η=0 and θ=1, (hm)-convex function can be captured.

    (iii) By choosing η=0 and h(tθ)=tθ, (θ,m)-convex function can be obtained.

    (iv) By setting η=0, θ=1 and m=1, h-convex function [32] can be captured.

    (v) By taking η=0, θ=1 and h(t)=t, m-convex function [31] can be obtained.

    (vi) By choosing η=0, θ=1, m=1 and h(t)=t, convex function can be captured.

    (vii) By setting η=0, m=1, θ=1 and h(t)=1, P-function [6] can be obtained.

    (viii) By taking θ=1 and h(t)=ts, exponentially (s,m)-convex function [28] can be captured.

    (ix) By choosing θ=1, m=1 and h(t)=ts, exponentially s-convex function [23] can be obtained.

    (x) By setting θ=1, and h(t)=t, exponentially m-convex function [29] can be captured.

    (xi) By taking θ=1, m=1 and h(t)=t, exponentially convex function [3] can be obtained.

    (xii) By choosing η=0, θ=1 and h(t)=ts, (s,m)-convex function [2] can be captured.

    (xiii) By setting θ=1, η=0, m=1 and h(t)=ts, s-convex function [23] can be obtained.

    (xiv) By taking θ=1, η=0, m=1 and h(t)=1t, Godunova-Levin function [14] can be captured.

    (xv) By choosing θ=1, η=0, m=1 and h(t)=1ts, s-Godunova-Levin function of second kind can be obtained.

    The following inequality, named Hermite–Hadamard inequality, is one of the most famous inequalities in the literature for convex functions.

    Theorem 1.3. Let f:JRR be a convex function on J and a,bJ with a<b. Then the following double inequality holds:

    f(a+b2)1babaf(x)dxf(a)+f(b)2. (1.3)

    Various extensions of this notion have been reported in the literature in recent years, see [1,4,7,16,17,18,21,22,26,30].

    The objective of this paper is to obtain inequalities of Hadamard type via Caputo k-fractional derivatives of exponentially (θ,hm)-convex functions. Study of integration or differentiation of fractional order is known as fractional calculus. Its history is as old as the history of calculus. A lot of work has been published since the day of Leibniz (1695) and since then has occupied great number of mathematicians of their time [15,20,25,27].

    Fractional integral inequalities are in the study of several researchers, see [5,9,13] and references therein. The classical Caputo fractional derivatives are defined as follows:

    Definition 1.4. [20] Let α>0 and α{1,2,3,}, n=[α]+1, fACn[a,b] (the set of all functions f such that f(n) are absolutely continuous on [a,b]). The Caputo fractional derivatives of order α are defined by

    CDαa+f(x)=1Γ(nα)xaf(n)(t)(xt)αn+1dt,x>a, (1.4)

    and

    CDαbf(x)=(1)nΓ(nα)bxf(n)(t)(tx)αn+1dt,x<b. (1.5)

    If α=n{1,2,3,} and usual derivative of order n exists, then Caputo fractional derivative (CDαa+f)(x) coincides with f(n)(x), whereas (CDαbf)(x) coincides with f(n)(x) with exactness to a constant multiplier (1)n. In particular, we have

    (CD0a+f)(x)=(CD0bf)(x)=f(x), (1.6)

    where n=1 and α=0.

    In [9], Farid et al. defined Caputo kfractional derivatives as follows:

    Definition 1.5. Let α>0,k1 and α{1,2,3,}, n=[α]+1, fACn[a,b]. The Caputo k-fractional derivatives of order α are given as

    CDα,ka+f(x)=1kΓk(nαk)xaf(n)(t)(xt)αkn+1dt,x>a, (1.7)

    and

    CDα,kbf(x)=(1)nkΓk(nαk)bxf(n)(t)(tx)αkn+1dt,x<b, (1.8)

    where Γk(α) is the k-gamma function defined as

    Γk(α)=0tα1etkkdt.

    Also

    Γk(α+k)=αΓk(α).

    Motivated by above results and literatures, the paper is organized in the following manner:

    In section 2, we present some inequalities of Hadamard type for exponentially (θ,hm)convex functions via Caputo kfractional derivatives. In section 3, we use the integral identity including the (n+1)-order derivative of f to establish interesting Hadamard type inequalities for exponentially (θ,hm)convexity via Caputo k-fractional derivatives. In section 4, a briefly conclusion will be provided as well.

    In this section, we give the Caputo k–fractional derivatives inequality of Hadamard type for a function whose n-th derivatives are exponentially (θ,hm)–convex.

    Theorem 2.1. Let α>0,k1 and α{1,2,3,}, n=[α]+1 and [a,b][0,+), f:[0,+)R be a function such that fACn[a,mb], where a<mb. Also, assume that f(n) be an exponentially (θ,hm)-convex function with (θ,m)(0,1]2 and ηR. Then the following inequalities for Caputo k-fractional derivatives hold:

    1g(η)f(n)(bm+a2)kΓk(nαk+k)(mba)nαk×(h(112θ)mnαk+1(1)n(CDα,kbf)(am)+h(12θ)(CDα,ka+f)(mb))knαk×{(h(112θ)m2f(n)(am2)eηam2+h(12θ)mf(n)(b)eηb)10tnαk1h(1tθ)dt+(h(112θ)mf(n)(b)eηb+h(12θ)f(n)(a)eηa)10tnαk1h(tθ)dt}, (2.1)

    where g(η)=1eηbforη<0 and g(η)=1eηamforη0.

    Proof. Since f(n) is an exponentially (θ,hm)-convex function on [a,b], then

    f(n)(um+v2)h(112θ)mf(n)(u)eηu+h(12θ)f(n)(v)eηv,u,v[a,b].

    By setting u=(1t)am+tbb and v=m(1t)b+taa in the above inequality for t[0,1], then by integrating with respect to t over [0,1] after multiplying with tnαk1, we have

    f(n)(bm+a2)10tnαk1dth(112θ)(10tnαk1mf(n)((1t)am+tb)eη((1t)am+tb)dt+h(12θ)10tnαk1f(n)(m(1t)b+ta)eη(m(1t)b+ta)dt).

    Now, if we let w=(1t)am+tb and z=m(1t)b+ta in right hand side of above inequality, we get

    f(n)(bm+a2)1nαkh(112θ)(bam(wambam)nαk1mf(n)(w)dweηw(bam)+h(12θ)mba(mbzmba)nαk1f(n)(z)dzeηz(mba)).

    Hence

    f(n)(bm+a2){g(η)kΓk(nαk+k)(mba)nαk(h(112θ)mnαk+1(1)n(CDα,kbf)(am)+h(12θ)(CDα,ka+f)(mb))}. (2.2)

    On the other hand by using exponentially (θ,hm)-convexity of f(n), we have

    mf(n)((1t)am+tb)m2h(1tθ)f(n)(am2)eηam2+mh(tθ)f(n)(b)eηb.

    By multiplying both sides of above inequality with (nαk)h(112θ)tnαk1 and integrating with respect to t over [0,1], after some calculations we get

    kΓk(nαk+k)(mba)nαk(h(112θ)mnαk+1(1)n(CDα,kbf)(am))h(112θ)(nαk){m2f(n)(am2)eηam210tnαk1h(1tθ)dt+mf(n)(b)eηb10tnαk1h(tθ)dt}. (2.3)

    Similarly,

    f(n)(m(1t)b+ta)mh(1tθ)f(n)(b)eηb+h(tθ)f(n)(a)eηa.

    By multiplying both sides of above inequality with (nαk)h(12θ)tnαk1 and integrating with respect to t over [0,1], after some calculations we get

    kΓk(nαk+k)(mba)nαk(h(12θ)(CDα,ka+f)(mb))h(12θ)(nαk){mf(n)(b)eηb10tnαk1h(1tθ)dt+f(n)(a)eηa10tnαk1h(tθ)dt}. (2.4)

    By adding (2.3) and (2.4), we obtain

    kΓk(nαk+k)(mba)nαk(h(112θ)mnαk+1(1)n(CDα,kbf)(am)+h(12θ)(CDα,ka+f)(mb))(nαk){(h(112θ)m2f(n)(am2)eηam2+h(12θ)mf(n)(b)eηb)10tnαk1h(1tθ)dt+(h(112θ)mf(n)(b)eηb+h(12θ)f(n)(a)eηa)10tnαk1h(tθ)dt}.

    Combining above with (2.2), we get required result.

    Corollary 2.2. By setting k=1 in inequality (2.1), the following inequalities hold for exponentially (θ,hm)-convex functions via Caputo fractional derivatives:

    1g(η)f(n)(bm+a2)Γ(nα+1)(mba)nα(h(112θ)mnα+1(1)n(CDαbf)(am)+h(12θ)(CDαa+f)(mb))(nα){(h(112θ)m2f(n)(am2)eηam2+h(12θ)mf(n)(b)eηb)10tnα1h(1tθ)dt+(h(112θ)mf(n)(b)eηb+h(12θ)f(n)(a)eηa)10tnα1h(tθ)dt}.

    Corollary 2.3. Taking η=0 in (2.1), the following inequalities hold for (θ,hm)-convex functions via Caputo k-fractional derivatives:

    f(n)(bm+a2)kΓk(nαk+k)(mba)nαk(h(112θ)mnαk+1(1)n(CDα,kbf)(am)+h(12θ)(CDα,ka+f)(mb))(knαk){(h(112θ)m2f(n)(am2)+h(12θ)mf(n)(b))10tnαk1h(1tθ)dt+(h(112θ)mf(n)(b)+h(12θ)f(n)(a))10tnαk1h(tθ)dt}.

    Corollary 2.4. Choosing η=0 and θ=1 in (2.1), the following inequalities hold for (hm)-convex functions via Caputo k-fractional derivatives defined in [[24], Theorem 2.1]:

    f(n)(bm+a2)kΓk(nαk+k)2(mba)nαk(mnαk+1(1)n(CDα,kbf)(am)+(CDα,ka+f)(mb))knα2k{(m2f(n)(am2)+mf(n)(b))10tnαk1h(1t)dt+(mf(n)(b)+f(n)(a))10tnαk1h(t)dt}.

    Corollary 2.5. By setting η=0, θ=1 and k=1 in (2.1), the following inequalities hold for (hm)-convex functions via Caputo fractional derivatives defined in [[24], Corollary 2.2]:

    f(n)(bm+a2)Γ(nα+1)2(mba)nα(mnα+1(1)n(CDαbf)(am)+(CDαa+f)(mb))nα2{(m2f(n)(am2)+mf(n)(b))10tnα1h(1t)dt+(mf(n)(b)+f(n)(a))10tnα1h(t)dt}.

    Corollary 2.6. Taking θ=1 and h(t)=ts in (2.1), the following inequalities hold for exponentially (s,m)-convex functions via Caputo k-fractional derivatives:

    1g(η)f(n)(bm+a2)kΓk(nαk+k)2s(mba)nαk(mnαk+1(1)n(CDα,kbf)(am)+(CDα,ka+f)(mb))knαk2s{(m2f(n)(am2)eηam2+mf(n)(b)eηb)β(knαk,s+1)+(mf(n)(b)eηb+f(n)(a)eηa)kknα+ks},

    where β(,) is well–known beta function.

    Corollary 2.7. Choosing η=0, θ=1, m=1 and h(t)=t in (2.1), the following inequalities hold for convex functions via Caputo k-fractional derivatives defined in [[8], Theorem 2.2]:

    f(n)(a+b2)kΓk(nαk+k)2(ba)nαk((1)n(CDα,kbf)(a)+(CDα,ka+f)(b))f(n)(a)+f(n)(b)2.

    Corollary 2.8. By setting η=0, θ=1, m=1, h(t)=t and k=1 in (2.1), the following inequalities hold for convex functions via Caputo fractional derivatives:

    f(n)(a+b2)Γ(nα+1)2(ba)nα((1)n(CDαbf)(a)+(CDαa+f)(b))f(n)(a)+f(n)(b)2.

    In the following we generalize the fractional Hadamard type inequalities for exponentially (θ,hm)convex function via Caputo k-fractional derivatives.

    Theorem 2.9. Let α>0,k1 and α{1,2,3,}, n=[α]+1 and [a,b][0,+), f:[0,+)R be a function such that fACn[a,mb], where a<mb. Also, assume that f(n) be an exponentially (θ,hm)-convex function with (θ,m)(0,1]2 and ηR. Then the following inequalities for Caputo k-fractional derivatives hold:

    1g(η)f(n)(a+bm2)2(nαk)kΓk(nαk+k)(bma)nαk(h(112θ)mnαk+1(1)(n)(CDα,k(a+bm2m)f)(am)+h(12θ)(CDα,k(a+bm2)+f)(mb))(knαk){(h(112θ)m2f(n)(am2)eηam2+h(12θ)mf(n)(b)eηb)10tnαk1h(1(t2)θ)dt+(h(112θ)mf(n)(b)eηb+h(12θ)f(n)(a)eηa)10tnαk1h((t2)θ)dt}, (2.5)

    where g(η)=1eηbforη<0 and g(η)=1eηamforη0.

    Proof. From exponentially (θ,hm)convexity of f(n) one can have

    f(n)(um+v2)h(112θ)mf(n)(u)eηu+h(12θ)f(n)(v)eηv.

    Putting u=t2b+(2t)2am and u=t2a+m(2t)2b in the above inequality where t[0,1], and multiplying with tnαk1, then integrating with respect to t over [0,1] one can have

    f(n)(a+bm2)10tnαk1dth(112θ)(10tnαk1mf(n)(t2b+(2t)2am)eη(t2b+(2t)2am)dt+h(12θ)10tnαk1f(n)(t2a+m(2t)2b)eη(t2a+m(2t)2b)dt).

    By change of variables, we get

    1g(η)f(n)(a+bm2)2(nαk)kΓk(nαk+k)(bma)nαk×(h(112θ)mnαk+1(1)(n)(CDα,k(a+bm2m)f)(am)+h(12θ)(CDα,k(a+bm2)+f)(mb)). (2.6)

    Now, using the exponentially (θ,hm)convexity of f(n), we can write

    f(n)(t2a+m(2t)2b)h((t2)θ)f(n)(a)eηa+mh(1(t2)θ)f(n)(b)eηb.

    Multiplying both sides of above inequality with (nαk)h(12θ)tnαk1 and integrating with respect to t over [0,1], then by change of variables, we have

    h(12θ)2(nαk)kΓk(nαk+k)(bma)nαk((CDα,k(a+bm2)+f)(mb))(nαk)h(12θ){mf(n)(b)eηb10tnαk1h(1(t2)θ)dt+f(n)(a)eηa10tnαk1h((t2)θ)dt}. (2.7)

    Again by using the exponentially (θ,hm)convexity of f(n), we can write

    mf(n)(t2b+(2t)2am)mh(t2)θf(n)(b)eηb+m2h(1(t2)θ)f(n)(am2)eηam2.

    Multiplying both sides of above inequality with (nαk)h(112θ)tnαk1 and integrating with respect to t over [0,1], then by change of variables, we have

    h(112θ)2(nαk)kΓk(nαk+k)(bma)nαk(mnαk+1(1)(n)(CDα,k(a+bm2m)f)(am))(nαk)h(112θ){m2f(n)(am2)eηam210tnαk1h(1(t2)θ)dt+mf(n)(b)eηb10tnαk1h((t2)θ)dt}. (2.8)

    Adding (2.7) and (2.8), we get

    2(nαk)kΓk(nαk+k)(bma)nαk(h(112θ)mnαk+1(1)(n)(CDα,k(a+bm2m)f)(am)+h(12θ)(CDα,k(a+bm2)+f)(mb))(nαk){(h(112θ)m2f(n)(am2)eηam2+h(12θ)mf(n)(b)eηb)10tnαk1h(1(t2)θ)dt+(h(112θ)mf(n)(b)eηb+h(12θ)f(n)(a)eηa)10tnαk1h((t2)θ)dt}.

    By combining above with (2.6), we get required result.

    Corollary 2.10. By setting k=1 in inequality (2.5), the following inequalities hold for exponentially (θ,hm)-convex functions via Caputo fractional derivatives:

    1g(η)f(n)(a+bm2)2(nα)Γ(nα+1)(bma)nαk(h(112θ)mnα+1(1)(n)(CDα(a+bm2m)f)(am)+h(12θ)(CDα(a+bm2)+f)(mb))(nα){(h(112θ)m2f(n)(am2)eηam2+h(12θ)mf(n)(b)eηb)10tnα1h(1(t2)θ)dt+(h(112θ)mf(n)(b)eηb+h(12θ)f(n)(a)eηa)10tnα1h((t2)θ)dt}.

    Corollary 2.11. Taking η=0 in (2.5), the following inequalities hold for (θ,hm)-convex functions via Caputo k-fractional derivatives:

    f(n)(a+bm2)2(nαk)kΓk(nαk+k)(bma)nαk(h(112θ)mnαk+1(1)(n)(CDα,k(a+bm2m)f)(am)+h(12θ)(CDα,k(a+bm2)+f)(mb))(knαk){(h(112θ)m2f(n)(am2)+h(12θ)mf(n)(b))10tnαk1h(1(t2)θ)dt+(h(112θ)mf(n)(b)+h(12θ)f(n)(a))10tnαk1h((t2)θ)dt}.

    Corollary 2.12. Choosing η=0 and θ=1 in (2.5), the following inequalities hold for (hm)-convex functions via Caputo k-fractional derivatives defined in [[24], Theorem 2.4]:

    f(n)(a+bm2)2(nαk)kΓk(nαk+k)(bma)nαkh(12)(mnαk+1(1)(n)(CDα,k(a+bm2m)f)(am)+(CDα,k(a+bm2)+f)(mb))knαkh(12)×{(m2f(n)(am2)+mf(n)(b))10tnαk1h(2t2)dt+(mf(n)(b)+f(n)(a))10tnαk1h(t2)dt}.

    Corollary 2.13. By setting η=0, θ=1 and k=1 in (2.5), the following inequalities hold for (hm)-convex functions via Caputo fractional derivatives defined in [[24], Corollary 2.5]:

    f(n)(a+bm2)2(nα)Γ(nα+1)(bma)nαkh(12)(mnα+1(1)(n)(CDα(a+bm2m)f)(am)+(CDα(a+bm2)+f)(mb))(nα)h(12)×{(m2f(n)(am2)+mf(n)(b))10tnα1h(2t2)dt+(mf(n)(b)+f(n)(a))10tnα1h(t2)dt}.

    Corollary 2.14. Taking θ=1 and h(t)=ts in (2.5), the following inequalities hold for exponentially (s,m)-convex functions via Caputo k-fractional derivatives:

    1g(η)f(n)(a+bm2)2(nαks)kΓk(nαk+k)(bma)nαk×(mnαk+1(1)(n)(CDα,k(a+bm2m)f)(am)+(CDα,k(a+bm2)+f)(mb)).122s{(m2f(n)(am2)eηam2+mf(n)(b)eηb)kΓk(nαk+k)+(mf(n)(b)eηb+f(n)(a)eηa)knαknα+ks}.

    Corollary 2.15. Choosing η=0, θ=1, m=1 and h(t)=t in (2.5), the following inequalities hold for convex functions via Caputo k-fractional derivatives defined in [[10], Theorem 6]:

    f(n)(a+b2)2(nαk)kΓk(nαk+k)2(ba)nαk×((1)(n)(CDα,k(a+b2)f)(a)+(CDα,k(a+b2)+f)(b))f(n)(a)+f(n)(b)2.

    Corollary 2.16. By setting η=0, θ=1, m=1, h(t)=t and k=1 in (2.5), the following inequalities hold for convex functions via Caputo fractional derivatives defined in [[19] Theorem 2.2]:

    f(n)(a+b2)2(nα)Γ(nα+1)2(ba)nαk×((1)(n)(CDα(a+b2)f)(a)+(CDα(a+b2)+f)(b))f(n)(a)+f(n)(b)2.

    In the next, some other inequalities of Hadamard type for exponentially (θ,hm)convex function via Caputo kfractional derivatives are given.

    Theorem 2.17. Let α>0,k1 and α{1,2,3,}, n=[α]+1 and f:[0,+)R be a function such that fACn[a,mb], where a<mb. Also, assume that f(n) be an exponentially (θ,hm)-convex function with (θ,m)(0,1]2 and ηR. Then the following inequalities for Caputo k-fractional derivatives hold:

    kΓk(nαk)(ba)nαk((CDα,ka+f)(b)+(1)n(CDα,kbf)(a))(f(n)(a)eηa+f(n)(b)eηb)×10tnαk1h(tθ)dt+m(f(n)(bm)eηbm+f(n)(am)eηam)10tnαk1h(1tθ)dt1(npαkpp+1)1p(10(h(tθ))qdt)1q×(f(n)(a)eηa+f(n)(b)eηb+m(f(n)(bm)eηbm+f(n)(am)eηam)), (2.9)

    where p1+q1=1 and p>1.

    Proof. Since f(n) is exponentially (θ,hm)convex on [a,b], then for (θ,m)(0,1]2 and t[0,1], we have

    f(n)(ta+(1t)b)+f(n)((1t)a+tb)h(tθ)(f(n)(a)eηa+f(n)(b)eηb)+mh(1tθ)(f(n)(bm)eηbm+f(n)(am)eηam).

    Multiplying both sides of above inequality with tnαk1 and integrating the above inequality with respect to t on [0,1], we have

    10tnαk1(f(n)(ta+(1t)b)+f(n)((1t)a+tb))dt(f(n)(a)eηa+f(n)(b)eηb)10tnαk1h(tθ)dt+m(f(n)(bm)eηbm+f(n)(am)eηam)10tnαk1h(1tθ)dt.

    If we set x=ta+(1t)b in the left side of above inequality, we get the following inequality

    kΓk(nαk)(ba)nαk((CDα,ka+f)(b)+(1)n(CDα,kbf)(a))(f(n)(a)eηa+f(n)(b)eηb)10tnαk1h(tθ)dt+m(f(n)(bm)eηbm+f(n)(am)eηam)10tnαk1h(1tθ)dt. (2.10)

    We get the first inequality of (2.9). The second inequality of (2.9) follows by using the Hölder's inequality

    10tnαk1h(tθ)dt1(npαkpp+1)1p(10(h(tθ))qdt)1q.

    Combining it with (2.10) we get (2.9).

    Corollary 2.18. By setting k=1 in (2.9), the following inequalities hold for exponentially (θ,hm)-convex functions via Caputo fractional derivatives:

    Γ(nα)(ba)nα((CDαa+f)(b)+(1)n(CDαbf)(a))(f(n)(a)eηa+f(n)(b)eηb)×10tnα1h(tθ)dt+m(f(n)(bm)eηbm+f(n)(am)eηam)10tnα1h(1tθ)dt1(npαpp+1)1p(10(h(tθ))qdt)1q×(f(n)(a)eηa+f(n)(b)eηb+m(f(n)(bm)eηbm+f(n)(am)eηam)).

    Corollary 2.19. Taking η=0 in (2.9), the following inequalities hold for (θ,hm)-convex functions via Caputo k-fractional derivatives:

    kΓk(nαk)(ba)nαk((CDα,ka+f)(b)+(1)n(CDα,kbf)(a))(f(n)(a)+f(n)(b))×10tnαk1h(tθ)dt+m(f(n)(bm)+f(n)(am))10tnαk1h(1tθ)dt1(npαkpp+1)1p(10(h(tθ))qdt)1q×(f(n)(a)+f(n)(b)+m(f(n)(bm)+f(n)(am))).

    Corollary 2.20. Choosing η=0 and θ=1 in (2.9), the following inequalities hold for (hm)-convex functions via Caputo k-fractional derivatives defined in [[24], Theorem 2.7]:

    kΓk(nαk)(ba)nαk((CDα,ka+f)(b)+(1)n(CDα,kbf)(a))(f(n)(a)+f(n)(b))×10tnαk1h(t)dt+m(f(n)(bm)+f(n)(am))10tnαk1h(1t)dt1(npαkpp+1)1p(10(h(t))qdt)1q×(f(n)(a)+f(n)(b)+m(f(n)(bm)+f(n)(am))).

    Corollary 2.21. By setting η=0, θ=1 and k=1 in (2.9), the following inequalities hold for (hm)-convex functions via Caputo fractional derivatives defined in [[24], Corollary 2.8]:

    Γ(nα)(ba)nα((CDαa+f)(b)+(1)n(CDαbf)(a))(f(n)(a)+f(n)(b))×10tnα1h(t)dt+m(f(n)(bm)+f(n)(am))10tnα1h(1t)dt1(npαpp+1)1p(10(h(t))qdt)1q×(f(n)(a)+f(n)(b)+m(f(n)(bm)+f(n)(am))).

    Corollary 2.22. Taking θ=1 and h(t)=ts in (2.9), the following inequalities hold for exponentially (s,m)-convex functions via Caputo k-fractional derivatives:

    kΓk(nαk)(ba)nαk((CDα,ka+f)(b)+(1)n(CDα,kbf)(a))k(f(n)(a)eηa+f(n)(b)eηb)knα+ks+m(f(n)(bm)eηbm+f(n)(am)eηam)β(nαk,s+1)k(f(n)(a)eηa+f(n)(b)eηb)knα+ks+m(f(n)(bm)eηbm+f(n)(am)eηam)(npαkpp+1)1p(qs+1)1q.

    Corollary 2.23. Choosing η=0, θ=1, m=1 and h(t)=t in (2.9), the following inequalities hold for convex functions via Caputo k-fractional derivatives:

    kΓk(nαk)(ba)nαk((CDα,ka+f)(b)+(1)n(CDα,kbf)(a))k(f(n)(a)+f(n)(b))knα2(f(n)(a)+f(n)(b))(npαkpp+1)1p(q+1)1q.

    Theorem 2.24. Let α>0,k1 and α{1,2,3,}, n=[α]+1 and [a,b][0,+), f:[0,+)R be a function such that fACn[a,mb], where a<mb and h be a superadditive function. Also, assume that f(n) be an exponentially (θ,hm)-convex function with (θ,m)(0,1]2 and ηR. Then the following inequality for Caputo kfractional derivatives holds:

    kΓk(nαk+k)(ba)nαk((CDα,ka+f)(b)+(1)n(CDα,kbf)(a))h(1)2((f(n)(a)eηa+f(n)(b)eηb)+m(f(n)(bm)eηbm+f(n)(am)eηam)). (2.11)

    Proof. Since f(n) is exponentially (θ,hm)convex on [a,b], then for t[0,1], we get

    f(n)(ta+(1t)b)+f(n)((1t)a+tb)(h(tθ)+h(1tθ))2((f(n)(a)eηa+f(n)(b)eηb)+m(f(n)(bm)eηbm+f(n)(am)eηam)).

    Since h is superadditive function, then

    h(tθ)+h(1tθ)h(1),for allθ(0,1]andt[0,1].

    Therefore

    f(n)(ta+(1t)b)+f(n)((1t)a+tb)h(1)2((f(n)(a)eηa+f(n)(b)eηb)+m(f(n)(bm)eηbm+f(n)(am)eηam)).

    Multiplying both sides of above inequality with tnαk1 and integrating with respect to t over [0,1], yield the following

    10tnαk1(f(n)(ta+(1t)b)+f(n)((1t)a+tb))dth(1)2((f(n)(a)eηa+f(n)(b)eηb)+m(f(n)(bm)eηbm+f(n)(am)eηam))10tnαk1dt.

    By change of variable, we get the required result.

    Corollary 2.25. By setting k=1 in (2.11), the following inequality holds for exponentially (θ,hm)-convex functions via Caputo fractional derivatives:

    Γ(nα+1)(ba)nα((CDαa+f)(b)+(1)n(CDαbf)(a))h(1)2((f(n)(a)eηa+f(n)(b)eηb)+m(f(n)(bm)eηbm+f(n)(am)eηam)).

    Corollary 2.26. Taking η=0 and θ=1 in (2.11), the following inequality holds for (hm)-convex functions via Caputo k-fractional derivatives defined in [[24], Theorem 2.9]:

    kΓk(nαk+k)(ba)nαk((CDα,ka+f)(b)+(1)n(CDα,kbf)(a))h(1)2((f(n)(a)+f(n)(b))+m(f(n)(bm)+f(n)(am))).

    Corollary 2.27. Choosing η=0, θ=1 and k=1 in (2.11), the following inequality holds for (hm)-convex functions via Caputo k-fractional derivatives defined in [[24], Corollary 2.10]:

    Γ(nα+1)(ba)nα((CDαa+f)(b)+(1)n(CDαbf)(a))h(1)2((f(n)(a)+f(n)(b))+m(f(n)(bm)+f(n)(am))).

    Corollary 2.28. By setting η=0, θ=1, m=1, h(t)=t and k=1 in (2.11), the following inequality holds for convex functions via Caputo fractional derivatives:

    Γ(nα+1)(ba)nα((CDαa+f)(b)+(1)n(CDαbf)(a))f(n)(a)+f(n)(b).

    We need the following known lemma to prove our next results.

    Lemma 3.1. [24] Let α>0,k1 and α{1,2,3,}, n=[α]+1 and f:[a,mb]R, where a,b[0,+) be a differentiable mapping on interval (a,mb), with a<mb and m(0,1]. If fACn+1[a,mb], then the following equality for Caputo kfractional derivatives holds:

    f(n)(mb)+f(n)(b)2kΓk(nαk+k)2(mba)nαk((CDα,ka+f)(mb)+(CDα,kmbf)(a))=mba210((1t)nαktnαk)f(n+1)(m(1t)b+ta)dt.

    Caputo kfractional derivative inequalities of Hadamard type for exponentially (θ,hm)convex function in terms of the (n+1)-th derivatives in absolute, is obtained in the following theorem by using above lemma.

    Theorem 3.2. Let α>0,k1 and α{1,2,3,}, n=[α]+1 and [a,b][0,+), f:[0,+)R be a function such that fACn+1[a,mb], where a<mb. If |f(n+1)| is an exponentially (θ,hm)convex with (θ,m)(0,1]2 and ηR, then the following inequality for Caputo kfractional derivatives holds:

    |f(n)(mb)+f(n)(a)2kΓk(nαk+k)2(mba)nαk(CDα,kb+f)(mb)+(CDα,kmbf)(a)|mba2((2npαkp+11)1p(2npαkp+1(npαkp+1))1p1)×(|f(n+1)(a)|eηa((120(h(tθ))qdt)1q+(112(h(tθ))qdt)1q)+m|f(n+1)(b)|eηb((120(h(1tθ))qdt)1q+(112(h(1tθ))qdt)1q)), (3.1)

    where 1p+1q=1 and p>1.

    Proof. From Lemma 3.1 and by using the properties of modulus, we get

    |f(n)(mb)+f(n)(b)2kΓk(nαk+k)2(mba)nαk((CDα,ka+f)(mb)+(CDα,kmbf)(a))|mba210|(1t)nαktnαk||f(n+1)(m(1t)b+ta)|dt.

    By exponentially (θ,hm)convexity of |f(n+1)|, we have

    |f(n)(mb)+f(n)(a)2kΓk(nαk+k)2(mba)nαk(CDα,ka+f)(mb)+(CDα,kmbf)(a)|mba2120((1t)nαktnαk)(mh(1tθ)|f(n+1)(b)eηb|+h(tθ)|f(n+1)(a)eηa|)dt+112(tnαk(1t)nαk)(mh(1tθ)|f(n+1)(b)eηb|+h(tθ)|f(n+1)(a)eηa|)dt=mba2{|f(n+1)(a)eηa|(120(1t)nαkh(tθ)dt120tnαkh(tθ)dt)+m|f(n+1)(b)eηb|(120(1t)nαkh(1tθ)dt120tnαkh(1tθ)dt)+|f(n+1)(a)eηa|(112tnαkh(tθ)dt112(1t)nαkh(tθ)dt)+m|f(n+1)(b)eηb|(112tnαkh(1tθ)dt112(1t)nαkh(1tθ)dt)}. (3.2)

    Now, using the Hölder's inequality in the right hand side of (3.2), we obtain

    |f(n)(mb)+f(n)(a)2kΓk(nαk+k)2(mba)nαk(CDα,kb+f)(mb)+(CDα,kmbf)(a)|mba2{|f(n+1)(a)eηa|((2npαkp+11)1p1(2npαkp+1(npαkp+1))1p(120(h(tθ))qdt)1q+(2npαkp+11)1p1(2npαkp+1(npαkp+1))1p(112(h(tθ))qdt)1q)+m|f(n+1)(b)eηb|((2npαkp+11)1p1(2npαkp+1(npαkp+1))1p(120(h(1tθ))qdt)1q+(2npαkp+11)1p1(2npαkp+1(npαkp+1))1p(112(h(1tθ))qdt)1q)}.

    After a little computation one can get inequality (3.1).

    Corollary 3.3. By setting k=1 in (3.1), the following inequality holds for exponentially (θ,hm)-convex functions via Caputo fractional derivatives:

    |f(n)(mb)+f(n)(a)2Γ(nα+1)2(mba)nα(CDαb+f)(mb)+(CDαmbf)(a)|mba2((2npαp+11)1p(2npαp+1(npαp+1))1p1)×(|f(n+1)(a)|eηa((120(h(tθ))qdt)1q+(112(h(tθ))qdt)1q)+m|f(n+1)(b)|eηb((120(h(1tθ))qdt)1q+(112(h(1tθ))qdt)1q)).

    Corollary 3.4. Taking η=0 in (3.1), the following inequality holds for (θ,hm)-convex functions via Caputo k-fractional derivatives:

    |f(n)(mb)+f(n)(a)2kΓk(nαk+k)2(mba)nαk(CDα,kb+f)(mb)+(CDα,kmbf)(a)|mba2((2npαkp+11)1p(2npαkp+1(npαkp+1))1p1)×(|f(n+1)(a)|((120(h(tθ))qdt)1q+(112(h(tθ))qdt)1q)+m|f(n+1)(b)|((120(h(1tθ))qdt)1q+(112(h(1tθ))qdt)1q)).

    Corollary 3.5. Choosing η=0 and θ=1 in (3.1), the following inequality holds for (hm)-convex functions via Caputo k-fractional derivatives defined in [[24], Theorem 3.1]:

    |f(n)(mb)+f(n)(a)2kΓk(nαk+k)2(mba)nαk(CDα,kb+f)(mb)+(CDα,kmbf)(a)|(mba)(|f(n+1)(a)|+m|f(n+1)(b)|)[(2npαkp+11)1p]2[(2npαkp+1(npαkp+1))1p1]×((120(h(t))qdt)1q+(112(h(t))qdt)1q).

    Corollary 3.6. By setting η=0, θ=1 and k=1 in (3.1), the following inequality holds for (hm)-convex functions via Caputo fractional derivatives defined in [[24], Corollary 3.2]:

    |f(n)(mb)+f(n)(a)2Γ(nα+1)2(mba)nα(CDαb+f)(mb)+(CDαmbf)(a)|(mba)(|f(n+1)(a)|+m|f(n+1)(b)|)[(2npαp+11)1p]2[(2npαp+1(npαp+1))1p1]×((120(h(t))qdt)1q+(112(h(t))qdt)1q).

    Corollary 3.7. Taking θ=1 and h(t)=ts in (3.1), the following inequality holds for exponentially (s,m)-convex functions:

    |f(n)(mb)+f(n)(a)2kΓk(nαk+k)2(mba)nαk(CDα,kb+f)(mb)+(1)n(CDα,kmbf)(a)|(mba)(|f(n+1)(a)eηa|+m|f(n+1)(b)eηb|)2×{(2nαk+s12nαk+s(nαk+s+1)+(2npαkp+11)1p(2qs+11)1q(2npαkp+1(npαkp+1))1p(2qs+1(qs+1))1q)}.

    Corollary 3.8. Choosing η=0, θ=1, m=1, h(t)=t and k=1 in (3.1), the following inequality holds for convex functions via Caputo fractional derivatives:

    |f(n)(b)+f(n)(a)2Γ(nα+1)2(ba)nα(CDαb+f)(b)+(CDαbf)(a)|(ba)(|f(n+1)(a)|+|f(n+1)(b)|)[(2npαp+11)1p((2q+11)1q+1)]2[((2npαp+1(npαp+1))1p1)(2q+1(q+1))1q].

    In this paper, some inequalities of Hadamard type for exponentially (α,hm)–convex functions via Caputo k–fractional derivatives are obtained. By applied integral identity including the (n+1)–order derivative of a given function via Caputo k–fractional derivatives, we given some new of its related integral inequalities results. Some new results are given and know results are recaptured as special cases from our results. Since convexity and (exponentially (α,hm)–convexity) have large applications in many mathematical areas, they can be applied to obtain several results in convex analysis, special functions, quantum mechanics, related optimization theory, mathematical inequalities and may stimulate further research in different areas of pure and applied sciences.

    The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions, which led to considerable improvement of the article.

    The authors A. Mukheimer and T. Abdeljawad would like to thank Prince Sultan University for paying APC and for the support through the TAS research lab. The work was also supported by the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan.

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] Z. Ali, T. Mahmood, M. S. Yang, Aczel-alsina power aggregation operators for complex picture fuzzy (cpf) sets with application in cpf multi-attribute decision making, Symmetry, 15 (2023), 651. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15030651 doi: 10.3390/sym15030651
    [2] V. Arya, S. Kumar, A novel todim-vikor approach based on entropy and jensen-tsalli divergence measure for picture fuzzy sets in a decision-making problem, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 35 (2020), 2140–2180. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22289 doi: 10.1002/int.22289
    [3] K. T. Atanassov, Operators over interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Set. Syst., 64 (1994), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(94)90331-X doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(94)90331-X
    [4] K. T. Atanassov, S. Stoeva, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Set. Syst., 20 (1986), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1870-3_1 doi: 10.1007/978-3-7908-1870-3_1
    [5] N. M. F. H. N. Badrul, K. M. N. K. Khalif, N. I. Jaini, Synergic ranking of fuzzy z-numbers based on vectorial distance and spread for application in decision-making, AIMS Math., 8 (2023), 11057–11083. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023560 doi: 10.3934/math.2023560
    [6] G. Cao, L. Shen, A novel parameter similarity measure between interval-valued picture fuzzy sets with its app-lication in pattern recognition, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 44 (2023), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-224314 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-224314
    [7] T. Chen, Evolved distance measures for circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their exploitation in the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutions, Artif. Intell. Rev., 56 (2023), 7347–7401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10318-x doi: 10.1007/s10462-022-10318-x
    [8] Z. Chen, P. Liu, Intuitionistic fuzzy value similarity measures for intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Comput. Appl. Math., 41 (2022), 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-021-01737-7 doi: 10.1007/s40314-021-01737-7
    [9] B. Cuong, Picture fuzzy sets-first results, part 1, seminar neuro-fuzzy systems with applications, Institute of Mathematics, Hanoi, 2013.
    [10] B. C. Cuong, V. Kreinovich, Picture fuzzy sets, J. Comput. Sci. Technol., 30 (2014), 409–420.
    [11] P. Dutta, Medical diagnosis via distance measures on picture fuzzy sets, Adv. Model. Anal. A, 54 (2017), 657–672.
    [12] P. Dutta, Medical diagnosis based on distance measures between picture fuzzy sets, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., 7 (2018), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJFSA.2018100102 doi: 10.4018/IJFSA.2018100102
    [13] Rasyidah, R. Efendi, N. M. Nawi, M. M. Deris, S. A. Burney, Cleansing of inconsistent sample in linear regression model based on rough sets theory, Soft Comput., 5 (2023), 200046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sasc.2022.200046 doi: 10.1016/j.sasc.2022.200046
    [14] A. H. Ganie, S. Singh, P. K. Bhatia, Some new correlation coefficients of picture fuzzy sets with applications, Neural. Comput. Appl., 32 (2020), 12609–12625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-04715-y doi: 10.1007/s00521-020-04715-y
    [15] A. Ganie, A picture fuzzy distance measure and its application to pattern recognition problems, Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst., 20 (2023), 71–85.
    [16] E. Haktanır, C. Kahraman, Intelligent replacement analysis using picture fuzzy sets: Defender-challenger comparison application, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 121 (2023), 106018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106018 doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106018
    [17] M. K. Hasan, M. Y. Ali, A. Sultana, N. K. Mitra, Extension principles for picture fuzzy sets, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 44 (2023), 6265–6275. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-220616 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-220616
    [18] A. G. Hatzimichailidis, G. A. Papakostas, V. G. Kaburlasos, A novel distance measure of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application to pattern recognition problems, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 27 (2012), 396–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21529 doi: 10.1002/int.21529
    [19] E. Hellinger, Neue begründung der theorie quadratischer formen von unendlichvielen veränderlichen., J. Reine Angew. Math., 1909 (1909), 210–271. https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1909.136.210 doi: 10.1515/crll.1909.136.210
    [20] I. M. Hezam, P. Rani, A. R. Mishra, A. Alshamrani, An intuitionistic fuzzy entropy-based gained and lost dominance score decision-making method to select and assess sustainable supplier selection, AIMS Math., 8 (2023), 12009–12039. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023606 doi: 10.3934/math.2023606
    [21] H. Huang, Z. Liu, X. Han, X. Yang, L. Liu, A belief logarithmic similarity measure based on dempster-shafer theory and its application in multi-source data fusion, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 45 (2023), 4935–4947. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-230207 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-230207
    [22] C. M. Hwang, M. S. Yang, W. L. Hung, New similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on the jaccard index with its application to clustering, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 33 (2018), 1672–1688. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21990 doi: 10.1002/int.21990
    [23] R. Jaikumar, S. Raman, M. Pal, Perfect score function in picture fuzzy set and its applications in decision-making problems, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 44 (2023), 3887–3900. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-223234 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-223234
    [24] A. M. Khalil, S. G. Li, H. Garg, H. Li, S. Ma, New operations on interval-valued picture fuzzy set, interval-valued picture fuzzy soft set and their applications, IEEE Access, 7 (2019), 51236–51253.
    [25] X. Li, Z. Liu, X. Han, N. Liu, W. Yuan, An intuitionistic fuzzy version of hellinger distance measure and its application to decision-making process, Symmetry, 15 (2023), 500. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15020500 doi: 10.3390/sym15020500
    [26] D. Y. F. Lin, Influence of weight function for similarity measures, AIMS Math., 7 (2022), 6915–6935. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022384 doi: 10.3934/math.2022384
    [27] M. Lin, C. Huang, Z. Xu, Multimoora based mcdm model for site selection of car sharing station under picture fuzzy environment, Sustain. Cities Soc., 53 (2020), 101873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101873 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101873
    [28] M. Lin, X. Li, R. Chen, H. Fujita, J. Lin, Picture fuzzy interactional partitioned heronian mean aggregation operators: An application to madm process, Artif. Intell. Rev., 55 (2022), 1171–1208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-09953-7 doi: 10.1007/s10462-021-09953-7
    [29] M. Lin, J. Wei, Z. Xu, R. Chen, Multiattribute group decision-making based on linguistic pythagorean fuzzy interaction partitioned bonferroni mean aggregation operators, Complexity, 2018 (2018), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9531064 doi: 10.1155/2018/9531064
    [30] D. Liu, X. Chen, D. Peng, Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy ordered weighted cosine similarity measure and its application in investment decision-making, Complexity, 2017 (2017), 1891923. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1891923 doi: 10.1155/2017/1891923
    [31] M. Liu, S. Zeng, T. Balezentis, D. Streimikiene, Picture fuzzy weighted distance measures and their application to investment selection, Amfiteatru Econ., 21 (2019), 682–695. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2019/52/682 doi: 10.24818/EA/2019/52/682
    [32] P. Liu, M. Munir, T. Mahmood, K. Ullah, Some similarity measures for interval-valued picture fuzzy sets and their applications in decision making, Information, 10 (2019), 369. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10120369 doi: 10.3390/info10120369
    [33] Z. Liu, Credal-based fuzzy number data clustering, Granul. Comput., 8 (2023), 1907–1924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-023-00410-0 doi: 10.1007/s41066-023-00410-0
    [34] Z. Liu, An effective conflict management method based on belief similarity measure and entropy for multi-sensor data fusion, Artif. Intell. Rev., 56 (2023), 15495–15522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10533-0 doi: 10.1007/s10462-023-10533-0
    [35] Z. Liu, Y. Cao, X. Yang, L. Liu, A new uncertainty measure via belief rényi entropy in dempster-shafer theory and its application to decision making, Commun. Stat.-Theor. M., 2023, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2023.2253342 doi: 10.1080/03610926.2023.2253342
    [36] Z. Liu, H. Huang, Comment on "new cosine similarity and distance measures for fermatean fuzzy sets and topsis approach", Knowl. Inf. Syst., 65 (2023), 5151–5157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-023-01926-2 doi: 10.1007/s10115-023-01926-2
    [37] Z. Liu, H. Huang, S. Letchmunan, Adaptive weighted multi-view evidential clustering, In Int. Conf. Artif. Neural Netw., Springer, 2023,265–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44216-2_22
    [38] M. Luo, W. Li, Some new similarity measures on picture fuzzy sets and their applications, Soft Comput., 27 (2023), 6049–6067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-07902-w doi: 10.1007/s00500-023-07902-w
    [39] M. Luo, Y. Zhang, A new similarity measure between picture fuzzy sets and its application, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 96 (2020), 103956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103956 doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103956
    [40] Z. Ma, Z. Liu, C. Luo, L. Song, Evidential classification of incomplete instance based on k-nearest centroid neighbor, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 41 (2021), 7101–7115. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-210991 doi: 10.3233/JIFS-210991
    [41] T. Mahmood, H. M. Waqas, Z. Ali, K. Ullah, D. Pamucar, Frank aggregation operators and analytic hierarchy process based on interval-valued picture fuzzy sets and their applications, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 36 (2021), 7925–7962. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22614 doi: 10.1002/int.22614
    [42] A. Ohlan, Novel entropy and distance measures for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets with application in multi-criteria group decision-making, Int. J. Gen. Syst., 51 (2022), 413–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081079.2022.2036138 doi: 10.1080/03081079.2022.2036138
    [43] P. Perveen, S. J. John, H. Kamacı, T. Baiju, A novel similarity measure of picture fuzzy sets and its applications, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 44 (2023), 4653–4665.
    [44] C. Qin, M. Liu, Z. Zhang, H. Yu, Y. Jin, H. Sun, et al., An adaptive operating parameters decision-making method for shield machine considering geological environment, Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol., 141 (2023), 105372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2023.105372 doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2023.105372
    [45] A. U. Rahman, M. Saeed, H. Khalifa, W. A. Afif, Decision making algorithmic techniques based on aggregation operations and similarity measures of possibility intuitionistic fuzzy hypersoft sets, AIMS Math., 7 (2022), 3866–3895. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022214 doi: 10.3934/math.2022214
    [46] P. Rathnasabapathy, D. Palanisami, A theoretical development of improved cosine similarity measure for interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its applications, J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz Comput., 2022, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-022-04019-0 doi: 10.1007/s12652-022-04019-0
    [47] N. Rico, P. Huidobro, A. Bouchet, I. Díaz, Similarity measures for interval-valued fuzzy sets based on average embeddings and its application to hierarchical clustering, Inf. Sci., 615 (2022), 794–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.10.028 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.10.028
    [48] J. Sanabria, K. Rojo, F. Abad, A new approach of soft rough sets and a medical application for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease, AIMS Math., 8 (2023), 2686–2707. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023141 doi: 10.3934/math.2023141
    [49] M. Saqlain, M. Riaz, R. Imran, F. Jarad, Distance and similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy hypersoft sets with application: Evaluation of air pollution in cities based on air quality index, AIMS Math., 8 (2023), 6880–6899. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023348 doi: 10.3934/math.2023348
    [50] H. Seiti, A. Hafezalkotob, L. Martínez, R-numbers, a new risk modeling associated with fuzzy numbers and its application to decision making, Inf. Sci., 483 (2019), 206–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.01.006 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.01.006
    [51] J. A. Shah, D. Sukheja, P. Bhatnagar, A. Jain, A decision-making problem using dissimilarity measure in picture fuzzy sets, Mater. Today, 80 (2023), 3405–3410.
    [52] M. S. Sindhu, T. Rashid, A. Kashif, An approach to select the investment based on bipolar picture fuzzy sets, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., 23 (2021), 2335–2347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-021-01072-3 doi: 10.1007/s40815-021-01072-3
    [53] A. Singh, S. Kumar, Picture fuzzy set and quality function deployment approach based novel framework for multi-criteria group decision making method, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 104 (2021), 104395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104395 doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104395
    [54] P. Singh, N. K. Mishra, M. Kumar, S. Saxena, V. Singh, Risk analysis of flood disaster based on similarity measures in picture fuzzy environment, Afrika Mat., 29 (2018), 1019–1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13370-018-0597-x doi: 10.1007/s13370-018-0597-x
    [55] L. H. Son, Measuring analogousness in picture fuzzy sets: From picture distance measures to picture association measures, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak., 16 (2017), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-016-9249-5 doi: 10.1007/s10700-016-9249-5
    [56] A. Taouti, W. A. Khan, Fuzzy subnear-semirings and fuzzy soft subnear-semirings, AIMS Math., 6 (2021), 2268–2286. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021137 doi: 10.3934/math.2021137
    [57] N. X. Thao, S. Y. Chou, Novel similarity measures, entropy of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application in software quality evaluation, Soft Comput., 2022, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-06373-1 doi: 10.1007/s00500-021-06373-1
    [58] N. V. Dinh, N. X. Thao, N. Xuan, Some measures of picture fuzzy sets and their application in multi-attribute decision making, Int. J. Math. Sci. Comput., 4 (2018), 23–41.
    [59] G. Wei, F. E. Alsaadi, T. Hayat, A. Alsaedi, Projection models for multiple attribute decision making with picture fuzzy information, Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern., 9 (2018), 713–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-016-0604-1 doi: 10.1007/s13042-016-0604-1
    [60] J. Wu, L. Li, W. Sun, Gödel semantics of fuzzy argumentation frameworks with consistency degrees, AIMS Math., 5 (2020), 4045–4064.
    [61] F. Xiao, Efmcdm: Evidential fuzzy multicriteria decision making based on belief entropy, IEEE T. Fuzzy Syst., 28 (2020), 1477–1491. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2936368 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2936368
    [62] F. Xiao, W. Pedrycz, Negation of the quantum mass function for multisource quantum information fusion with its application to pattern classification, IEEE T. Pattern Anal., 45 (2023), 2054–2070. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3167045 doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3167045
    [63] D. Xie, F. Xiao, W. Pedrycz, Information quality for intuitionistic fuzzy values with its application in decision making, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 109 (2022), 104568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104568 doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104568
    [64] C. Xu, Y. Wen, New measure of circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application in decision making, AIMS Math., 8 (2023), 24053–24074. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20231226 doi: 10.3934/math.20231226
    [65] C. Yang, F. Xiao, An exponential negation of complex basic belief assignment in complex evidence theory, Inf. Sci., 622 (2023), 1228–1251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.11.160 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.11.160
    [66] J. Ye, Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy cosine similarity measures for multiple attribute decision-making, Int. J. Gen. Syst., 42 (2013), 883–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081079.2013.816696 doi: 10.1080/03081079.2013.816696
    [67] L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Inf. Control, 8 (1965), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813238183_0001 doi: 10.1142/9789813238183_0001
    [68] S. Zhang, F. Xiao, A TFN-based uncertainty modeling method in complex evidence theory for decision making, Inf. Sci., 619 (2023), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.11.014 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.11.014
    [69] X. Zhang, Y. Ma, Y. Li, C. Zhang, C. Jia, Tension prediction for the scraper chain through multi-sensor information fusion based on improved dempster-shafer evidence theory, Alex. Eng. J., 64 (2023), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.08.039 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.08.039
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Shuhua Wang, Convergence of online learning algorithm with a parameterized loss, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 20066, 10.3934/math.20221098
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2167) PDF downloads(133) Cited by(19)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog