Loading [MathJax]/jax/element/mml/optable/BasicLatin.js
Research article Special Issues

A piecewise heat equation with constant and variable order coefficients: A new approach to capture crossover behaviors in heat diffusion

  • Received: 29 October 2021 Revised: 17 February 2022 Accepted: 21 February 2022 Published: 28 February 2022
  • MSC : 37E05, 34K28, 65R10, 26A33

  • While the equation depicting the heat flow within homogeneous has been applied in several fields with some success, it has also faced several difficulties to depict heat diffusion in some non-homogeneous media. For particular behaviours adequate differential operators have been applied, for instance, a long-range behaviour has been depicted using operators based on power law kernel; stochastic behaviours have been included into mathematical equation using random function, some well-defined crossover behaviours have been depicted using the differential operators based on the generalized Mittag-Leffler kernel. Nevertheless, complex crossovers behaviours have not been modelled efficiently due to limitation of existing theories. Nevertheless, very recently piecewise calculus was proposed and applied in some complex world problems with great success. In this paper, heat equation with constant and variable coefficients will be subjected to piecewise numerical analysis. Several cases are considered, and their numerical simulation depicted.

    Citation: Abdon Atangana, Mekkaoui Toufik. A piecewise heat equation with constant and variable order coefficients: A new approach to capture crossover behaviors in heat diffusion[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8374-8389. doi: 10.3934/math.2022467

    Related Papers:

    [1] Tariq A. Aljaaidi, Deepak B. Pachpatte . Some Grüss-type inequalities using generalized Katugampola fractional integral. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1011-1024. doi: 10.3934/math.2020070
    [2] Mustafa Gürbüz, Yakup Taşdan, Erhan Set . Ostrowski type inequalities via the Katugampola fractional integrals. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 42-53. doi: 10.3934/math.2020004
    [3] Miguel Vivas-Cortez, Muhammad Aamir Ali, Artion Kashuri, Hüseyin Budak . Generalizations of fractional Hermite-Hadamard-Mercer like inequalities for convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 9397-9421. doi: 10.3934/math.2021546
    [4] Ghulam Farid, Hafsa Yasmeen, Hijaz Ahmad, Chahn Yong Jung . Riemann-Liouville Fractional integral operators with respect to increasing functions and strongly (α,m)-convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 11403-11424. doi: 10.3934/math.2021661
    [5] Saad Ihsan Butt, Artion Kashuri, Muhammad Umar, Adnan Aslam, Wei Gao . Hermite-Jensen-Mercer type inequalities via Ψ-Riemann-Liouville k-fractional integrals. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 5193-5220. doi: 10.3934/math.2020334
    [6] Hüseyin Budak, Fatma Ertuğral, Muhammad Aamir Ali, Candan Can Bilişik, Mehmet Zeki Sarikaya, Kamsing Nonlaopon . On generalizations of trapezoid and Bullen type inequalities based on generalized fractional integrals. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1833-1847. doi: 10.3934/math.2023094
    [7] Yanping Yang, Muhammad Shoaib Saleem, Waqas Nazeer, Ahsan Fareed Shah . New Hermite-Hadamard inequalities in fuzzy-interval fractional calculus via exponentially convex fuzzy interval-valued function. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 12260-12278. doi: 10.3934/math.2021710
    [8] Eze R. Nwaeze, Muhammad Adil Khan, Ali Ahmadian, Mohammad Nazir Ahmad, Ahmad Kamil Mahmood . Fractional inequalities of the Hermite–Hadamard type for m-polynomial convex and harmonically convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(2): 1889-1904. doi: 10.3934/math.2021115
    [9] Atiq Ur Rehman, Ghulam Farid, Sidra Bibi, Chahn Yong Jung, Shin Min Kang . k-fractional integral inequalities of Hadamard type for exponentially (s,m)-convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 882-892. doi: 10.3934/math.2021052
    [10] Thanin Sitthiwirattham, Muhammad Aamir Ali, Hüseyin Budak, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, Chanon Promsakon . Fractional Ostrowski type inequalities for differentiable harmonically convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(3): 3939-3958. doi: 10.3934/math.2022217
  • While the equation depicting the heat flow within homogeneous has been applied in several fields with some success, it has also faced several difficulties to depict heat diffusion in some non-homogeneous media. For particular behaviours adequate differential operators have been applied, for instance, a long-range behaviour has been depicted using operators based on power law kernel; stochastic behaviours have been included into mathematical equation using random function, some well-defined crossover behaviours have been depicted using the differential operators based on the generalized Mittag-Leffler kernel. Nevertheless, complex crossovers behaviours have not been modelled efficiently due to limitation of existing theories. Nevertheless, very recently piecewise calculus was proposed and applied in some complex world problems with great success. In this paper, heat equation with constant and variable coefficients will be subjected to piecewise numerical analysis. Several cases are considered, and their numerical simulation depicted.



    Fractional calculus is like an extended version of regular calculus that allows us to deal with numbers that are not whole, like 1.5 or 2.3. This might not sound like a big deal, but it is incredibly useful in many fields. When we want to understand how things change or accumulate over time, fractional calculus helps us do that more accurately, especially when things are complicated and do not follow normal rules. These fractional calculations come in handy when we are dealing with stuff like how liquids flow, how materials deform, or how we control things like robots or machines. Inequalities, in the context of fractional calculus, are like special rules that help us understand when things are bigger or smaller than each other, but with these non-whole numbers involved. These rules are important because they help us figure out if systems with fractional calculus are stable and work the way they should. Thus, in a nutshell, fractional calculus and inequalities help us make sense of the world in a more precise and practical way. Thus, the term convexity and inequalities in the frame of fractional calculus have been recommended as an engrossing area for researchers due to their vital role and fruitful importance in numerous branches of science. Integral inequalities have remarkable uses in probability, optimization theory, information technology, stochastic processes, statistics, integral operator theory and numerical integration. For the applications, see references [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8].

    In [9], a comprehensive and up-to-date review on Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for different kinds of convexities and different kinds of fractional integral operators is presented. In this review paper, we aim to discuss and present the up-to-date review of the Grüss type inequality via different fractional integral operators.

    In [10] (see also [11]), the Grüss inequality is defined as the integral inequality that establishes a connection between the integral of the product of two functions and the product of the integrals. The inequality is as follows.

    Theorem 1.1. If Ω,Π:[x1,x2]R are two continuous functions satisfying mΩ(t)M and pΠ(t)P, t[x1,x2], m,M,p,PR, then

    |1x2x1x2x1Ω(s)Π(s)ds1(x2x1)2x2x1Ω(s)dsx2x1Π(s)ds|14(Mm)(Pp).

    Our objective in this paper is to present a comprehensive and up-to-date review on Grüss-type inequalities for different kinds of fractional integral operators. In each section and subsection, we first introduce the basic definitions of fractional integral operators and then include the results on Grüss-type inequalities. We believe that the collection of almost all existing in the literature Grüss-type inequalities in one file will help new researchers in the field learn about the available work on the topic before developing new results. We present the results without proof but instead provide a complete reference for the details of each result elaborated in this survey for the convenience of the reader.

    The remainder of this review paper is as follows. In Sections 2–15, we summarize Grüss-type integral inequalities and especially for Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operators in Section 2, for Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals of a function with respect to another function in Section 3, in Section 4 for Katugampola fractional integral operators, in Section 5 for Hadamard's fractional integral operators, in Section 6 for k-fractional integral operators, in Section 7 for Raina's fractional integral operators, in Section 8 for tempered fractional integral operators, in Section 9 for conformable fractional integrals operators, in Section 10 for proportional fractional integrals operators, in Section 11 for generalized Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operators, in Section 12 for Caputo-Fabrizio fractional integrals operators, for Saigo fractional integral operators in Section 13, in Section 14 for quantum integral operators and in Section 15 for Hilfer fractional differential operators.

    Throughout this survey the following assumptions are used:

    (H) Assume that Ω,Π:IR are integrable functions on I for which there exist constants m,M,p,PR, such that

    mΩ(t)M,pΠ(t)P,tI.

    (H1) There exist two integrable functions Q1,Q2:[0,)R such that

    Q1(t)Ω(t)Q2(t)for allt[0,).

    (H2) There exist two integrable functions R1,R2:[0,)R such that

    R1(t)Π(t)R2(t)for allt[0,).

    In this subsection we give generalizations for Grüss-type inequalities by using the Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals. The first result deals with some inequalities using one fractional parameter.

    Definition 2.1. [12] A real valued function Ω(t),t0 is said to be in

    (ⅰ) the space Cμ,μR if there exists a real number p>μ such that Ω(t)=tpΩ1(t), where Ω1(t)C([0,),R),

    (ⅰ) the space Cnμ,μR if Ω(n)Cμ.

    Definition 2.2. [12] The Riemann-Liouville integral operator of fractional order α0, for an integrable function Ω is defined by

    JαΩ(t)=1Γ(α)t0(ts)α1Ω(s)ds,α>0,t>0,

    and J0Ω(t)=Ω(t).

    Theorem 2.1. [12] Assume that (H) holds on [0,). Then for all t>0 and α>0 we have:

    |tαΓ(α+1)JαΩ(t)Π(t)JαΩ(t)JαΠ(t)|(tα2Γ(α+1))2(Mm)(Pp).

    In the next result two real positive parameters are used.

    Theorem 2.2. [12] Assume that (H) holds on [0,). Then for all t>0 and α>0,β>0 we have:

    (tαΓ(α+1)JβΩ(t)Π(t)+tβΓ(β+1)JαΩ(t)Π(t)JαΩ(t)JβΠ(t)JβΩ(t)JαΠ(t))2[(MtαΓ(α+1)JαΩ(t))(JβΩ(t)mtβΓ(β+1))+(JαΩ(t)mtαΓ(α+1))(MtβΓ(β+1)JβΩ(t))]×[(PtαΓ(α+1)JαΠ(t))(JβΠ(t)ptβΓ(β+1))+(JαΠ(t)ptαΓ(α+1))(PtβΓ(β+1)JβΠ(t))].

    Next, we present some fractional integral inequalities of Grüss type by using the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral. The constants appeared as bounds of the functions Ω and Π, are replaced by four integrable functions.

    Theorem 2.3. [13] Assume that Ω:[0,)R is an integrable function satisfying (H1). Then, for t>0, α,β>0, we have:

    JβQ1(t)JαΩ(t)+JαQ2(t)JβΩ(t)JαQ2(t)JβQ1(t)+JαΩ(t)JβΩ(t).

    Theorem 2.4. [13] Suppose that Ω,Π:[0,)R are two integrable functions satisfying (H1) and (H2). Then, for t>0, α, β>0, the fractional integral inequalities hold:

    (i)JβR1(t)JαΩ(t)+JαQ2(t)JβΠ(t)JβR1(t)JαQ2(t)+JαΩ(t)JβΠ(t).(ii)JβQ1(t)JαΠ(t)+JαR2(t)JβΩ(t)JβQ1(t)JαR2(t)+JβΩ(t)JαΠ(t).(iii)JαQ2(t)JβR2(t)+JαΩ(t)JβΠ(t)JαQ2(t)JβΠ(t)+JβR2(t)JαΩ(t).(iv)JαQ1(t)JβR1(t)+JαΩ(t)JβΠ(t)JαQ1(t)JβΠ(t)+JβR1(t)JαΩ(t).

    Theorem 2.5. [13] Assume that Ω,Π:[0,)R are two integrable functions satisfying (H1) and (H2). Then for all t>0, α>0, we have:

    |tαΓ(α+1)JαΩ(t)Π(t)JαΩ(t)JαΠ(t)|T(Ω,Q1,Q2)T(Π,R1,R2),

    where T(y,z,w) is defined by

    T(y,z,w)=(Jαw(t)Jαy(t))(Jαy(t)Jαz(t))+tαΓ(α+1)Jαz(t)y(t)Jαz(t)Jαy(t)+tαΓ(α+1)Jαw(t)y(t)Jαw(t)Jαy(t)+Jαz(t)Jαw(t)tαΓ(α+1)Jαz(t)w(t).

    In the next theorem we give an Ostrowski-Grüss type inequality of fractional type via Riemann-Liouville fractional integral.

    Theorem 2.6. [14] Let Ω:[x1,x2]R be a differentiable mapping on (x1,x2) and |Ω(x)|M for all x[x1,x2]. Then

    |12Ω(x)(α+1)Γ(α)(x2x)1α2(x2x1)Jαx1Ω(x2)+12Jα1x1((x2x)1αΓ(α)Ω(x2))+(x2x)2α2(x2x1)Γ(α)Jα1x1Ω(x2)+(x2x)1α(xx1)2(x2x1)2αΩ(x1)|M(x2x)1αx2x1[(x2x1)α(xx1)+(x2x)α(x1+x22x)2α],

    where x1x<x2.

    Definition 3.1. [15] Let ψ:[0,)R be positive, increasing function and also its derivative ψ be continuous on [0,) and ψ(0)=0. The fractional integral of Riemann-Liouville type of an integrable function Ω with respect to another function ψ is defined as

    Iα,ψΩ(t)=1Γ(α)t0(ψ(t)ψ(s))α1ψ(s)Ω(s)ds.

    In the next we include Grüss type integral inequalities with the help of ψ-Riemann-Liouville fractional integral.

    Theorem 3.1. [16] Assume that ψ:[0,)R is a positive, increasing function and also its derivative ψ is continuous on [0,) and ψ(0)=0. Assume that Ω:[0,)R is an integrable function satisfying (H1). Then the following inequality holds:

    Iβ,ψQ1(t)Iα,ψΩ(t)+Iα,ψQ2(t)Iβ,ψΩ(t)Iα,ψQ2(t)Iβ,ψQ1(t)+Iβ,ψΩ(t)Iβ,ψΩ(t).

    Theorem 3.2. [16] Let ψ be as in Theorem 3.1 and Ω,Π be two integrable functions satisfying (H1) and (H2). Then we have:

    (a) Iβ,ψR1(t)Iα,ψΩ(t)+Iα,ψQ2(t)Iβ,ψΠ(t)Iβ,ψR1(t)Iα,ψQ2(t)+Iα,ψΩ(t)Iβ,ψΠ(t).

    (b) Iβ,ψQ1(t)Iα,ψΠ(t)+Iα,ψR2(t)Iβ,ψΩ(t)Iβ,ψQ1(t)Iα,ψR2(t)+Iβ,ψΩ(t)Iα,ψΠ(t).

    (c) Iα,ψQ2(t)Iβ,ψR2(t)+Iα,ψΩ(t)Iβ,ψΠ(t)Iα,ψQ2(t)Iβ,ψΠ(t)+Iβ,ψR2(t)Iα,ψΩ(t).

    (d) Iα,ψQ1(t)Iβ,ψR1(t)+Iα,ψΩ(t)Iβ,ψΠ(t)Iα,ψQ1(t)Iβ,ψΠ(t)+Iβ,ψR1(t)Iα,ψΩ(t).

    Theorem 3.3. [16] Let ψ be as in Theorem 3.1 and Ω,Π be two integrable functions satisfying (H1) and (H2). Then the following inequality holds:

    |ψα(t)Γ(α+1)Iα,ψΩ(t)Π(t)Iα,ψΩ(t)Iα,ψΠ(t)|T(Ω,Q1,Q2)T(Π,R1,R2),

    where

    T(y,z,w)=(Iα,ψw(t)Iα,ψy(t))(Iα,ψy(t)Iα,ψz(t))+ψα(t)Γ(α+1)Iα,ψv(t)Iα,ψy(t)Iα,ψz(t)Iα,ψy(t)+ψα(t)Γ(α+1)Iα,ψw(t)y(t)Iα,ψw(t)Iα,ψy(t)+Iα,ψz(t)Iα,ψw(t)ψα(t)Γ(α+1)Iα,ψz(t)w(t).

    Now we define the space Xpc(x1,x2) in which Katugampola's fractional integrals are defined.

    Definition 4.1. [17] The space Xpc(x1,x2)(cR,1p<) consists of those complex-valued Lebesgue measurable functions ϕ on (x1,x2) for which ϕXpc<, with

    ϕXpc=(x2x1|xcϕ(x)|pdxx)1/p(1p<),

    and

    ϕXc=esssup

    Definition 4.2. [17] Let \phi\in X_c^p(x_1, x_2), \alpha > 0 and \beta, \rho, \eta, \kappa\in \mathbb{R}. Then, the left- and right- sided fractional integrals of a function \phi are defined respectively by

    \begin{align} {}^{\rho}J^{\alpha,\beta}_{x_1+,\eta,\kappa}\phi(x) = \frac{\rho^{1-\beta}x^{\kappa}}{\Gamma(\alpha)}\int_{x_1}^x\frac{\tau^{\rho(\eta+1)-1}}{(x^{\rho}-\tau^{\rho})^{1-\alpha}}\phi(\tau)d\tau, \; \; 0\le x_1 < x < x_2\le \infty, \end{align}

    and

    \begin{align} {}^{\rho}J^{\alpha,\beta}_{x_2-,\eta,\kappa}\phi(x) = \frac{\rho^{1-\beta}x^{\rho\eta}}{\Gamma(\alpha)}\int_x^{x_2}\frac{\tau^{\kappa+\rho-1}}{(\tau^{\rho}-x^{\rho})^{1-\alpha}}\phi(\tau)d\tau, \; \; 0\le x_1 < x < x_2\le \infty,\end{align}

    if the integrals exist.

    Now, we present several Grüss-type inequalities involving Katugampola's fractional integral.

    Theorem 4.1. [17] Assume that (H) holds on [0, \infty). Then we have:

    \Big|\Lambda_{x,\kappa}^{\rho,\beta}(\alpha,\eta)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega(x)\Pi(x)-{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega(x){}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Pi(x)\Big| \le \Big(\Lambda_{x,\kappa}^{\rho,\beta}(\alpha,\eta)\Big)^2(\mathfrak{M}-\mathfrak{m})(\mathfrak{P}-\mathfrak{p}),

    for all \beta, \kappa\in \mathbb{R}, x > 0, \alpha > 0, \rho > 0 and \eta\ge 0, where

    \Lambda_{x,\kappa}^{\rho,\beta}(\alpha,\eta) = \frac{\Gamma(\eta+1)}{\Gamma(\eta+\alpha+1)}\rho^{-\beta}x^{\kappa+\rho(\eta+\alpha)}.

    Theorem 4.2. [17] Assume that (H) holds on [0, \infty). Then for all \beta, \kappa\in \mathbb{R}, x > 0, \alpha > 0, \gamma > 0 and \eta\ge 0, we have:

    \begin{eqnarray*} &&\Big(\Lambda_{x,\kappa}^{\rho,\beta}(\alpha,\eta)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\gamma,\beta}\Omega(x)\Pi(x)+\Lambda_{x,\kappa}^{\rho,\beta}(\gamma,\eta)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega(x)\Pi(x)-{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega(x)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Pi(x) \\ &&-{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\gamma,\beta}\Omega(x) \; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Pi(x)\Big)^2\\ &\le&\Big[\Big(\mathfrak{M}\Lambda_{x,\kappa}^{\rho,\beta}(\alpha,\eta)-{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega(x)\Big)\Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\gamma,\beta}\Omega(x)-\mathfrak{m}\Lambda_{x,\kappa}^{\rho,\beta}(\alpha,\eta)\Big)\\ &&+\Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega(x)-\mathfrak{m}\Lambda_{x,\kappa}^{\rho,\beta}(\alpha,\eta)\Big)\Big(\mathfrak{M}\Lambda_{x,\kappa}^{\rho,\beta}(\gamma,\eta)-{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\gamma,\beta}\Omega(x)\Big)\Big]\\ &&\times \Big[\Big(\mathfrak{P}\Lambda_{x,\kappa}^{\rho,\beta}(\alpha,\eta)-{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Pi(x)\Big)\Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\gamma,\beta}\Pi(x)-\mathfrak{p}\Lambda_{x,\kappa}^{\rho,\beta}(\gamma,\eta)\Big)\\ &&+\Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Pi(x)-\mathfrak{p}\Lambda_{x,\kappa}^{\rho,\beta}(\alpha,\eta)\Big)\Big(\mathfrak{P}\Lambda_{x,\kappa}^{\rho,\beta}(\gamma,\eta)-{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\gamma,\beta}\Pi(x)\Big)\Big]. \end{eqnarray*}

    Theorem 4.3. [17] Let \alpha > 0, \beta, \rho, \eta, \kappa\in \mathbb{R}, \Omega, \Pi\in X_c^p(0, x) x > 0 and p, q > 1 such that \frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} = 1. Then we have:

    \begin{eqnarray*} (a)\; \; \; &&\frac{1}{p}{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega^p(x)+\frac{1}{q}{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Pi^q(x)\ge \frac{\Gamma(\eta+\alpha+1)\rho^{\beta}}{\Gamma(\eta+1)x^{\rho(\eta+\alpha)+\kappa}}\Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega(x)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Pi(x)\Big).\\[0.3cm] (b)\; \; \; &&\frac{1}{p}{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega^p(x)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Pi^p(x)+\frac{1}{q}{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega^q(x)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Pi^q(x)\\ &\ge& \Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega(x)\Pi(x)\Big)^2.\\[0.3cm] (c)\; \; \; &&\frac{1}{p}{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega^p(x)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Pi^q(x)+\frac{1}{q}{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega^q(x)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Pi^p(x)\\ &\ge& \Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}(\Omega \Pi)^{p-1}(x)\Big)\Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}(\Omega \Pi)^{q-1}(x)\Big).\\[0.3cm] (d)\; \; \; &&{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega^p(x)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Pi^q(x)\ge \Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega(x)\Pi(x)\Big)\Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega^{p-1}(x)\Pi^{q-1}(x)\Big).\\[0.3cm] (e)\; \; \; &&\frac{1}{p}{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega^p(x)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Pi^2(x)+\frac{1}{q}{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega^2(x)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Pi^q(x)\\ &\ge& \Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega(x)\Pi(x)\Big)\Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega^{2/p}(x)\Pi^{2/p}(x)\Big).\\[0.3cm] (f)\; \; \; &&\frac{1}{p}{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega^2(x)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Pi^q(x)+\frac{1}{q}{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega^q(x)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Pi^2(x)\\ &\ge& \Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega^{2/p}(x)\Pi^{2/p}(x)\Big)\Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega^{p-1}(x)\Pi^{q-1}(x)\Big).\\[0.3cm] (g)\; \; \; &&{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega^2(x)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Big(\frac{\Pi^q(x)}{p}+\frac{\Pi^q(x)}{q}\Big)\\ &\ge& \Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega^{2/p}(x)\Pi(x)\Big)\Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega^{2/q}(x)\Pi(x)\Big). \end{eqnarray*}

    Theorem 4.4. [17]\ Assume that the assumptions of Theorem 4.3 are satisfied. In addition, let

    \mu = \min\limits_{0\le t\le x}\frac{\Omega(t) }{\Pi(t)}\; \; \; and\; \; \; \mathcal{M} = \max\limits_{0\le t\le x}\frac{\Omega(t) }{\Pi(t)}.

    Then we have:

    \begin{eqnarray*} (i)\; \; \; 0&\le&\Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega^2(x)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Pi^2(x)\Big)\le \frac{(\mathcal{M}+\mu)^2}{4\mu\mathcal{M}}\Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega(x) \Pi(x)\Big)^2.\\[0.3cm] (ii)\; \; \; 0&\le&\sqrt{{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega^2(x)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Pi^2(x)}-\Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega(x) \Pi(x)\Big)\\ &\le&\frac{(\sqrt{\mathcal{M}}-\sqrt{\mu})^2}{2\sqrt{\mu\mathcal{M}}}\Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega(x) \Pi(x)\Big).\\[0.3cm] (iii)\; \; \; 0&\le&{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega^2(x)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Pi^2(x)-\Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega(x) \Pi(x)\Big)^2\\ &\le&\frac{(\mathcal{M}-\mu)^2}{4\mu\mathcal{M}}\Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,\kappa}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega(x) \Pi(x)\Big)^2. \end{eqnarray*}

    Theorem 4.5. [18] Assume that \Omega: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} is an integrable function satisfying (H_1). Then we have:

    {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\alpha,\beta}Q_2(t)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\delta,\lambda}\Omega(t) +{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega(t) \; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\delta,\lambda}Q_1(t) \ge {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega(t) \; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\delta,\lambda}\Omega(t) +{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\alpha,\beta}Q_2(t)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\delta,\lambda}Q_1(t),

    for all t > 0, \alpha, \rho, \delta > 0, \beta, \eta, k, \lambda\in \mathbb{R}.

    Theorem 4.6. [18] Suppose that \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable functions satisfying (H_1) and (H_2). Then for all t > 0 and \alpha, \rho > 0, \beta, \eta, k\in \mathbb{R} we have:

    \Big[\Lambda_{t,k}^{\rho,\beta}(\alpha,\eta)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega(t) \Pi(t)-\Big({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\alpha,\beta}\Omega(t) \; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\alpha,\beta}\Pi(t)\Big)\Big]^2\le T(\Omega, Q_1, Q_2)T(\Pi, R_1, R_2),

    where

    \begin{eqnarray*} T(y,z,w)& = &({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\alpha,\beta}w(t)-{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\alpha,\beta}y(t))({}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\alpha,\beta}y(t)-{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\alpha,\beta}z(t))\\ &&+\Lambda_{t,k}^{\rho,\beta}(\alpha,\eta){}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\alpha,\beta}y(t)z(t)-{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\alpha,\beta}y(t)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\alpha,\beta}z(t)\\ &&+\Lambda_{t,k}^{\rho,\beta}(\alpha,\eta)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\alpha,\beta}y(t)w(t)-{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\alpha,\beta}y(t)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\alpha,\beta}w(t)\\ &&-\Lambda_{t,k}^{\rho,\beta}(\alpha,\eta)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\alpha,\beta}z(t)w(t)+{}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\alpha,\beta}z(t)\; {}^{\rho}J_{\eta,k}^{\alpha,\beta}w(t). \end{eqnarray*}

    Theorem 4.7. [18] Suppose that \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable functions satisfying (H_1) and (H_2). Then for all t > 0 and \alpha, \delta, \rho > 0, \beta, \lambda, \eta, k\in \mathbb{R} we have:

    (a) ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\delta, \lambda}\Omega(t) \; ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\alpha, \beta}Q_2(t)+^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\delta, \lambda} R_1(t)\; ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\alpha, \beta}\Pi(t) \ge ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\delta, \lambda} R_1(t)\; ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\alpha, \beta}Q_2(t)+ ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\delta, \lambda}\Omega(t) \; ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\alpha, \beta}\Pi(t).

    (b) ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\delta, \lambda}Q_1(t)\; ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\alpha, \beta}\Omega(t) +^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\alpha, \beta} R_2(t)\; ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\delta, \lambda}\Pi(t) \ge ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\delta, \lambda}Q_1(t)\; ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\alpha, \beta} R_2(t)+ ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\delta, \lambda}\Pi(t)\; ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\alpha, \beta}\Omega(t).

    (c) ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\alpha, \beta}Q_2(t)\; ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\delta, \lambda} R_2(t)+^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\alpha, \beta}\Pi(t)\; ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\delta, \lambda}\Omega(t) \ge ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\alpha, \beta}Q_2(t)\; ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\delta, \lambda}\Omega(t) + ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\delta, \lambda} R_2(t)\; ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\alpha, \beta}\Pi(t).

    (d) ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\alpha, \beta}Q_1(t)\; ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\delta, \lambda} R_1(t)+^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\alpha, \beta}\Pi(t)\; ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\delta, \lambda}\Omega(t) \ge ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\alpha, \beta}Q_1(t)\; ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\delta, \lambda}\Omega(t) + ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\delta, \lambda} R_1(t)\; ^{\rho}J_{\eta, k}^{\alpha, \beta}\Pi(t).

    Definition 5.1. [15] The fractional integral of Hadamard type of order \alpha\in \mathbb{R^+} of an integrable function \Omega(t) , for all t > 1 is defined as

    \begin{align} {_{H}J}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) = \frac{1}{\Gamma{(\alpha)}}\int_1^t \left(\log\frac{t}{s}\right)^{\alpha-1}\Omega(s)\frac{ds}{s}, \end{align} (5.1)

    provided the integral exists. (Here \log(\cdot) = \log_e(\cdot) ).

    We present, by using Hadamard's fractional integral, some Grüss-type fractional integral inequalities.

    Theorem 5.1. [19] Assume that \Omega: [1, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} is an integrable function satisfying (H_1). Then, for t > 1 , \alpha, \beta > 0 , we have

    {_{H}J}^{\beta}Q_1(t){_{H}J}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) +{_{H}J}^{\alpha}Q_2(t){_{H}J}^{\beta}\Omega(t) \geq {_{H}J}^{\alpha}Q_2(t){_{H}J}^{\beta}Q_1(t)+{_{H}J}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) {_{H}J}^{\beta}\Omega(t) .

    Theorem 5.2. [19] Assume that \Omega: [1, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} is an integrable function satisfying (H_1). Let \theta_1, \theta_2 > 0 satisfying 1/\theta_1+1/\theta_2 = 1 . Then, for t > 1 , \alpha, \beta > 0 , we have

    \begin{eqnarray*} && \frac{1}{\theta_1}\frac{(\log t)^{\beta}}{\Gamma(\beta+1)}{_{H}J}^{\alpha}\left((Q_2-\Omega)^{\theta_1}\right)(t)+\frac{1}{\theta_2}\frac{(\log t)^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}{_{H}J}^{\beta}\left((\Omega-Q_1)^{\theta_2}\right)(t)\nonumber\\ &&\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; \; + {_{H}J}^{\alpha}Q_2(t){_{H}J}^{\beta}Q_1(t)+{_{H}J}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) {_{H}J}^{\beta}\Omega(t) \nonumber\\ && \geq {_{H}J}^{\alpha}Q_2(t){_{H}J}^{\beta}\Omega(t) +{_{H}J}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) {_{H}J}^{\beta}Q_1(t). \end{eqnarray*}

    Theorem 5.3. [19] Assume that \Omega: [1, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} is an integrable function satisfying (H_1). Let \theta_1, \theta_2 > 0 satisfying \theta_1+\theta_2 = 1 . Then, for t > 1 , \alpha, \beta > 0 , we have

    \begin{eqnarray*} && \theta_1\frac{(\log t)^{\beta}}{\Gamma(\beta+1)}{_{H}J}^{\alpha}Q_2(t)+\theta_2\frac{(\log t)^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}{_{H}J}^{\beta}\Omega(t) \nonumber\\ &&\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \geq {_{H}J}^{\alpha}(Q_2-\Omega)^{\theta_1}(t){_{H}J}^{\beta}(\Omega-Q_1)^{\theta_2}(t)+\theta_1\frac{(\log t)^{\beta}}{\Gamma(\beta+1)}{_{H}J}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) \nonumber\\ &&\; \; \; \; \; \; \; +\theta_2\frac{(\log t)^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}{_{H}J}^{\beta}Q_1(t). \end{eqnarray*}

    Theorem 5.4. [19] Assume that \Omega: [1, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} is an integrable function satisfying (H_1). Let p\geq q\geq0 , p\neq 0 . Then, we have the following two inequalities, for any k > 0 , t > 1 , \alpha , \beta > 0,

    \begin{align} \label{H2-2} \begin{array}{ll} &(i) \; {_HJ^{\alpha}}(Q_2-\Omega)^{\frac{q}{p}}(t)+\frac{q}{p}k^{\frac{q-p}{p}}{_HJ^{\alpha}}\Omega(t) \leq\frac{q}{p}k^{\frac{q-p}{p}}{_HJ^{\alpha}}Q_2(t)+\frac{p-q}{p}k^{\frac{q}{p}}\frac{(\log t)^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}.\nonumber\\[0.5cm] &(ii) \; {_HJ^{\alpha}}(\Omega-Q_1)^{\frac{q}{p}}(t)+\frac{q}{p}k^{\frac{q-p}{p}}{_HJ^{\alpha}}Q_1(t)\leq\frac{q}{p}k^{\frac{q-p}{p}}{_HJ^{\alpha}}\Omega(t) +\frac{p-q}{p}k^{\frac{q}{p}}\frac{(\log t)^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}.\nonumber\\ \end{array} \end{align}

    Theorem 5.5. [19] Suppose that \Omega, \Pi: [1, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable functions satisfying (H_1) and (H_2). Then, for t > 0 , \alpha , \beta > 0 , we have:

    (a) \; {_{H}J}^{\beta} R_1(t){_{H}J}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) +{_{H}J}^{\alpha}Q_2(t){_{H}J}^{\beta}\Pi(t) \geq {_{H}J}^{\beta} R_1(t) {_{H}J}^{\alpha}Q_2(t)+ {_{H}J}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) {_{H}J}^{\beta}\Pi(t).

    (b) \; {_{H}J}^{\beta}Q_1(t){_{H}J}^{\alpha}\Pi(t)+{_{H}J}^{\alpha} R_2(t){_{H}J}^{\beta}\Omega(t) \geq {_{H}J}^{\beta}Q_1(t) {_{H}J}^{\alpha} R_2(t)+{_{H}J}^{\beta}\Omega(t) {_{H}J}^{\alpha}\Pi(t).

    (c) {_{H}J}^{\beta} R_2(t){_{H}J}^{\alpha}Q_2(t) + {_{H}J}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) {_{H}J}^{\beta}\Pi(t) \geq {_{H}J}^{\alpha}Q_2(t) {_{H}J}^{\beta}\Pi(t) + {_{H}J}^{\beta} R_2(t) {_{H}J}^{\alpha}\Omega(t).

    (d) \; {_{H}J}^{\alpha}Q_1(t) {_{H}J}^{\beta} R_1(t)+ {_{H}J}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) {_{H}J}^{\beta}\Pi(t)\geq {_{H}J}^{\alpha}Q_1(t) {_{H}J}^{\beta}\Pi(t)+ {_{H}J}^{\beta} R_1(t) {_{H}J}^{\alpha}\Omega(t).

    Theorem 5.6. [19] Suppose that \Omega, \Pi: [1, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable functions satisfying (H_1) and (H_2). Let \theta_1, \theta_2 > 0 such that 1/\theta_1+1/\theta_2 = 1 . Then, for t > 1 , \alpha , \beta > 0 , the following inequalities hold:

    () \; \frac{1}{\theta_1}\frac{(\log t)^{\beta}}{\Gamma(\beta+1)}{_HJ}^{\alpha}(Q_2-\Omega)^{\theta_1}(t)+\frac{1}{\theta_2}\frac{(\log t)^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}{_HJ}^{\beta}(R_2-\Pi)^{\theta_2}(t) \geq {_HJ}^{\alpha}(Q_2-\Omega)(t){_HJ}^{\beta}(R_2-\Pi)(t).

    () \; \frac{1}{\theta_1}{_HJ}^{\alpha}(Q_2-\Omega)^{\theta_1}(t){_HJ}^{\beta}(R_2-\Pi)^{\theta_1}(t) +\frac{1}{\theta_2}{_HJ}^{\alpha}(R_2-\Pi)^{\theta_2}(t){_HJ}^{\beta}(Q_2-\Omega)^{\theta_2}(t) \geq {_HJ}^{\alpha}(Q_2-\Omega)(R_2-\Pi)(t){_HJ}^{\beta}(Q_2-\Omega)(R_2-\Pi)(t).

    () \; \frac{1}{\theta_1}\frac{(\log t)^{\beta}}{\Gamma(\beta+1)}{_HJ}^{\alpha}(\Omega-Q_1)^{\theta_1}(t)+\frac{1}{\theta_2}\frac{(\log t)^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}{_HJ}^{\beta}(\Pi- R_1)^{\theta_2}(t) \geq {_HJ}^{\alpha}(\Omega-Q_1)(t){_HJ}^{\beta}(\Pi- R_1)(t).

    () \; \frac{1}{\theta_1}{_HJ}^{\alpha}(\Omega -Q_1)^{\theta_1}(t){_HJ}^{\beta}(\Pi- R_1)^{\theta_1}(t) +\frac{1}{\theta_2}{_HJ}^{\alpha}(\Pi- R_1)^{\theta_2}(t){_HJ}^{\beta}(\Omega-Q_1)^{\theta_2}(t) \geq {_HJ}^{\alpha}(\Omega-Q_1)(\Pi- R_1)(t){_HJ}^{\beta}(\Omega-Q_1)(\Pi- R_1)(t).

    Theorem 5.7. [19] Suppose that \Omega, \Pi: [1, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable functions satisfying (H_1) and (H_2). Let \theta_1, \theta_2 > 0 such that \theta_1+\theta_2 = 1 . Then, for t > 1 , \alpha , \beta > 0 , we have:

    (a) \; \; \; \; \; \theta_1\frac{(\log t)^{\beta}}{\Gamma(\beta+1)}{_HJ}^{\alpha}Q_2(t)+\theta_2\frac{(\log t)^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}{_HJ}^{\beta} R_2(t) \geq {_HJ}^{\alpha}(Q_2-\Omega)^{\theta_1}(t){_HJ}^{\beta}(R_2-\Pi)^{\theta_2}(t)+\theta_1\frac{(\log t)^{\beta}}{\Gamma(\beta+1)}{_HJ}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) +\theta_2\frac{(\log t)^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}{_HJ}^{\beta}\Pi(t).

    (b) \theta_1{_HJ}^{\alpha}Q_2(t){_HJ}^{\beta} R_2(t)+\theta_1{_HJ}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) {_HJ}^{\beta}\Pi(t) \; \; \; \; \; + \theta_2{_HJ}^{\alpha} R_2(t){_HJ}^{\beta}Q_2(t)+ \theta_2{_HJ}^{\alpha}\Pi(t){_HJ}^{\beta}\Omega(t) \geq {_HJ}^{\alpha}(Q_2-\Omega)^{\theta_1}(R_2-\Pi)^{\theta_2}(t){_HJ}^{\beta}(R_2-\Pi)^{\theta_1}(Q_2-\Omega)^{\theta_2}(t) \; \; \; \; \; +\theta_1{_HJ}^{\alpha}Q_2(t){_HJ}^{\beta}\Pi(t)+\theta_1{_HJ}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) {_HJ}^{\beta} R_2(t) \; \; \; \; \; +\theta_2{_HJ}^{\alpha} R_2(t){_HJ}^{\beta}\Omega(t) +\theta_2{_HJ}^{\alpha}\Pi(t){_HJ}^{\beta}Q_2(t).

    (c) \; \theta_1\frac{(\log t)^{\beta}}{\Gamma(\beta+1)}{_HJ}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) +\theta_2\frac{(\log t)^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}{_HJ}^{\beta}\Pi(t) \geq {_HJ}^{\alpha}(\Omega-Q_1)^{\theta_1}(t){_HJ}^{\beta}(\Pi- R_1)^{\theta_2}(t)+\theta_1\frac{(\log t)^{\beta}}{\Gamma(\beta+1)}{_HJ}^{\alpha}Q_1(t) +\theta_2\frac{(\log t)^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}{_HJ}^{\beta} R_1(t).

    (d) \; \theta_1{_HJ}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) {_HJ}^{\beta}\Pi(t)+\theta_1{_HJ}^{\alpha}Q_1(t){_HJ}^{\beta} R_1(t) \; \; \; \; \; + \theta_2{_HJ}^{\alpha}\Pi(t){_HJ}^{\beta}\Omega(t) + \theta_2{_HJ}^{\alpha} R_1(t){_HJ}^{\beta}Q_1(t) \geq {_HJ}^{\alpha}(\Omega-Q_1)^{\theta_1}(\Pi- R_1)^{\theta_2}(t){_HJ}^{\beta}(\Pi- R_1)^{\theta_1}(\Omega-Q_1)^{\theta_2}(t) \; \; \; \; \; +\theta_1{_HJ}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) {_HJ}^{\beta} R_1(t)+\theta_1{_HJ}^{\alpha}Q_1(t){_HJ}^{\beta}\Pi(t) \; \; \; \; \; +\theta_2{_HJ}^{\alpha}\Pi(t){_HJ}^{\beta}Q_1(t)+\theta_2{_HJ}^{\alpha} R_1(t){_HJ}^{\beta}\Omega(t).

    Theorem 5.8. [19] Suppose that \Omega, \Pi: [1, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable functions satisfying (H_1) and (H_2). Then for all t > 1 , \alpha > 0 , we have

    \begin{equation*} \left|\frac{(\log t)^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}{_{H}J}^{\alpha}\Omega(t)\Pi(t)-{_{H}J}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) {_{H}J}^{\alpha}\Pi(t)\right|\leq \left|T(\Omega, Q_1,Q_2)\right|^{\frac{1}{2}}\left|T(\Pi, R_1, R_2)\right|^{\frac{1}{2}}, \end{equation*}

    where T(y, z, w) is defined by

    \begin{eqnarray*} T(y,z,w)& = &\left({_{H}J}^{\alpha}w(t)-{_{H}J}^{\alpha}y(t)\right)\left({_{H}J}^{\alpha}y(t)-{_{H}J}^{\alpha}z(t)\right)\nonumber\\ && +\frac{(\log t)^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}{_{H}J}^{\alpha}z(t)y(t)-{_{H}J}^{\alpha}z(t){_{H}J}^{\alpha}y(t)\nonumber\\ && +\frac{(\log t)^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}{_{H}J}^{\alpha}w(t)y(t)-{_{H}J}^{\alpha}w(t){_{H}J}^{\alpha}y(t)\nonumber\\ && +{_{H}J}^{\alpha}z(t){_{H}J}^{\alpha}w(t)-\frac{(\log t)^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}{_{H}J}^{\alpha}z(t)w(t). \end{eqnarray*}

    In this section we present Grüss-type fractional integral inequalities concerning k -fractional integral operators.

    k -fractional integral inequalities of Grüss-type are included in this section.

    Definition 6.1. [20] The k -fractional integral of the Riemann-Liouville type is defined as follows:

    \begin{align} _{k}J^{\alpha}_{x_1}\Omega(t) = \frac{1}{k\Gamma_k(\alpha)}\int_{x_1}^t(x-s)^{\frac{\alpha}{k}-1}\Omega(s)ds , \; \; \alpha > 0, \; t > a. \end{align}

    Theorem 6.1. [21] Assume that \Omega: [0, \infty) is an integrable function satisfying (H_1). Then, for t > 0 , \alpha, \beta > 0 , k > 0 , we have

    \begin{equation*} _{k}J^{\beta }Q_{1}(t)_{k}J^{\alpha }\Omega(t) +\ _{k}J^{\alpha }Q_{2}(t)_{k}J^{\beta }\Omega(t) \geq \ _{k}J^{\alpha }Q_{2}(t)_{k}J^{\beta }Q_{1}(t) +\ _{k}J^{\alpha }\Omega(t) _{k}J^{\beta }\Omega(t) . \end{equation*}

    Theorem 6.2. [21] Assume that \Omega: [0, \infty) is an integrable function satisfying (H_1). Let \theta_1, \theta_2 > 0 such that 1/\theta_1+1/\theta_2 = 1 . Then, we have for t > 0 , \alpha, \beta > 0 and k > 0 ,

    \begin{eqnarray*} && \frac{1}{\theta_1}\frac{t^{\frac{\beta}{k}}}{\Gamma_k(\beta+k)}{_{k}J}^{\alpha}\left((Q_2-\Omega)^{\theta_1}\right)(t)+\frac{1}{\theta_2}\frac{t^{\frac{\alpha}{k}}} {\Gamma_k(\alpha+k)}{_{k}J}^{\beta}\left((\Omega-Q_1)^{\theta_2}\right)(t)\nonumber\\ && \; \; \; \; \; + {_{k}J}^{\alpha}Q_2(t){_{k}J}^{\beta}Q_1(t)+{_{k}J}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) {_{k}J}^{\beta}\Omega(t) \nonumber\\ && \geq {_{k}J}^{\alpha}Q_2(t){_{k}J}^{\beta}\Omega(t) +{_{k}J}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) {_{k}J}^{\beta}Q_1(t). \end{eqnarray*}

    Theorem 6.3. [21] Assume that \Omega: [0, \infty) is an integrable function satisfying (H_1). Let \theta_1, \theta_2 > 0 such that \theta_1+\theta_2 = 1 . Then, for t > 0 , \alpha, \beta > 0 and k > 0 , we have

    \begin{eqnarray*} && \theta_1\frac{t^{\frac{\beta}{k}}}{\Gamma_k(\beta+k)}{_{k}J}^{\alpha}Q_2(t)+\theta_2\frac{t^{\frac{\alpha}{k}}}{\Gamma_k(\alpha+k)}{_{k}J}^{\beta}\Omega(t) \nonumber\\ &&\; \; \; \geq {_{k}J}^{\alpha}(Q_2-\Omega)^{\theta_1}(t){_{k}J}^{\beta}(\Omega-Q_1)^{\theta_2}(t)+\theta_1\frac{t^{\frac{\beta}{k}}}{\Gamma_k(\beta+k)}{_{k}J}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) +\theta_2\frac{t^{\frac{\alpha}{k}}}{\Gamma_k(\alpha+k)}{_{k}J}^{\beta}Q_1(t). \end{eqnarray*}

    Theorem 6.4. [21] Assume that \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty) \to \mathbb{R} are two integrable functions satisfying (H_1) and (H_2). Then, for t > 0 , \alpha , \beta > 0 , k > 0\ we have:

    (ⅰ) _{k}J^{\beta }R_{1}(t)\ _{k}J^{\alpha }\Omega(t) +\ _{k}J^{\alpha }Q_{2}(t)\ _{k}J^{\beta }\Pi(t)\geq \ _{k}J^{\beta }R _{1}(t)\ _{k}J^{\alpha }Q_{2}(t)+\ _{k}J^{\alpha }\Omega(t) \ _{k}J^{\beta }\Pi(t).

    (ⅱ) _{k}J^{\beta }Q_{1}(t)\ _{k}J^{\alpha }\Pi(t)+\ _{k}J^{\alpha }R_{2}(t)\ _{k}J^{\beta }\Omega(t) \geq \ _{k}J^{\beta }Q _{1}(t)\ _{k}J^{\alpha }R_{2}(t)+\ _{k}J^{\beta }\Omega(t) \ _{k}J^{\alpha }\Pi(t).

    (ⅲ) _{k}J^{\alpha }Q_{2}(t)_{\ k}J^{\beta }R _{2}(t)+\ _{k}J^{\alpha }\Omega(t) \ _{k}J^{\beta }\Pi(t)\geq \ _{k}J^{\alpha }Q_{2}(t)\ _{k}J^{\beta }\Pi(t)+\ _{k}J^{\beta }R_{2}(t)\ _{k}J^{\alpha }\Omega(t).

    (ⅳ) _{k}J^{\alpha }Q_{1}(t)J^{\beta }R _{1}(t)+\ _{k}J^{\alpha }\Omega(t) \ _{k}J^{\beta }\Pi(t)\geq \ _{k}J^{\alpha }Q_{1}(t)\ _{k}J^{\beta }\Pi(t)+\ _{k}J^{\beta }R_{1}(t)\ _{k}J^{\alpha }\Omega(t).

    Theorem 6.5. [21] Assume that \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty) \to \mathbb{R} are two integrable functions satisfying (H_1) and (H_2). Then for all t > 0 , \alpha > 0 , k > 0 , we have

    \begin{equation*} \left\vert \frac{t^{\frac{\alpha }{k}}}{\Gamma _{k}(\alpha +k)}\ _{k}J^{\alpha }\Omega(t)\Pi(t)-\ _{k}J^{\alpha }\Omega(t) \ _{k}J^{\alpha }\Pi(t)\right\vert \leq \sqrt{T(\Omega, Q_{1},Q_{2})T(\Pi, R_{1},R_{2})}, \end{equation*}

    where

    \begin{eqnarray*} T(y,z,w)& = &\left( \ _{k}J^{\alpha }w(t)-\ _{k}J^{\alpha }y(t)\right) \left( \ _{k}J^{\alpha }y(t)-\ _{k}J^{\alpha }z(t)\right)\\ && +\frac{t^{\frac{\alpha }{k}}}{\Gamma _{k}(\alpha +k) }\ _{k}J^{\alpha }z(t)y(t)-_{k}J^{\alpha }z(t)\ _{k}J^{\alpha }y(t) \\ && +\frac{t^{\frac{\alpha }{k}}}{\Gamma _{k}(\alpha +k) }J^{\alpha }w(t)y(t)-_{k}J^{\alpha }w(t)\ _{k}J^{\alpha }y(t) \\ && +_{k}J^{\alpha }z(t)\ _{k}J^{\alpha }w(t)-\frac{ t^{\frac{\alpha }{k}}}{\Gamma _{k}(\alpha +k)}\ _{k}J^{\alpha }z(t)w(t). \end{eqnarray*}

    Theorem 6.6. [22] Assume that (H) holds on [x_1, x_2] and p be a positive function on [x_1, x_2]. Then for all t > 0, k > 0, \alpha > 0, we have

    \Big|\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\alpha}p(t)\Big)\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\alpha}p(t)\Omega(t)\Pi(t)\Big)-\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\alpha}p(t)\Omega(t) \Big)\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\alpha}p(t)\Pi(t)\Big)\Big|\le \frac{\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\alpha}p(t)\Big)^2}{4}(\mathfrak{M}-\mathfrak{m})(\mathfrak{P}-\mathfrak{p}).

    Theorem 6.7. [22] Let the assumptions of Theorem 6.6 be satisfied. Then, for all t > 0, k > 0, \alpha, \beta > 0, t he following inequality holds:

    \begin{eqnarray*} &&\Big[\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\alpha}p(t)\Big)\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\beta}p(t)\Omega(t)\Pi(t)\Big)+\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\beta}p(t)\Big)\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\alpha}p(t)\Omega(t)\Pi(t)\Big)-\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\alpha}p(t)\Omega(t) \Big)\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\alpha}p(t)\Pi(t)\Big)\\ &&-\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\beta}p(t)\Omega(t) \Big)\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\alpha}p(t)\Pi(t)\Big)\Big]^2\\ &\le& \Big\{\Big[\mathfrak{M}\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\alpha}p(t)\Big)-\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\alpha}p(t)\Omega(t) \Big)\Big]\Big[\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\beta}p(t)\Omega(t) \Big)-\mathfrak{m}\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\beta}p(t)\Big)\Big]\\ &&+\Big[\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\alpha}p(t)\Omega(t) \Big)-\mathfrak{m}\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\alpha}p(t)\Big)\Big]\Big[M\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\beta}p(t)\Big)-\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\beta}p\Omega(t) \Big)\Big]\Big\}\\ &&\times\Big\{\Big[\mathfrak{P}\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\alpha}p(t)\Big)-\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\alpha}p(t)\Pi(t)\Big)\Big]\Big[\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\beta}p(t)\Pi(t)\Big)-\mathfrak{p}\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\beta}p(t)\Big)\Big]\\ &&+\Big[\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\alpha}p(t)\Pi(t)\Big)-\mathfrak{p}\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\alpha}p(t)\Big)\Big]\Big[\mathfrak{P}\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\beta}p(t)\Big)-\Big({}_{k}J_{x_1}^{\beta}p(t)\Pi(t)\Big)\Big]\Big\}. \end{eqnarray*}

    Definition 6.2. [23] Let \psi be a positive and increasing function on [x_1, x_2]. Then the left-sided and right-sided generalized Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals of a function \Omega with respect to another function \psi of order \alpha > 0 are defined by

    \begin{align} J^{\alpha,\psi}_{x_1+,k}\Omega(t) = \frac{1}{k\Gamma_k(\alpha)}\int_{x_1}^t(\psi(t)-\psi(s))^{\frac{\alpha}{k}-1}\psi'(s)\Omega(s)ds , \; t > x_1, \end{align}
    \begin{align} J^{\alpha,\psi}_{x_2-,k}\Omega(t) = \frac{1}{k\Gamma_k(\alpha)}\int_t^{x_2}(\psi(s)-\psi(t))^{\frac{\alpha}{k}-1}\psi'(s)\Omega(s)ds , \; t < x_2. \end{align}

    Theorem 6.8. [23] Assume that \Omega: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} is an integrable function satisfying (H_1). Then, for t > 0 , \alpha, \beta > 0 , k > 0 , we have:

    \begin{equation*} J^{\beta,\psi}_{0+,k}Q_{1}(t) J^{\alpha,\psi}_{0+,k}\Omega(t) +\ J^{\alpha,\psi}_{0+,k}Q_{2}(t) J^{\beta,\psi}_{0+,k}\Omega(t) \geq \ J^{\alpha,\psi}_{0+,k}Q_{2}(t) J^{\beta,\psi}_{0+,k}Q_{1}(t) +\ J^{\alpha,\psi}_{0+,k}\Omega(t) J^{\beta,\psi}_{0+,k}\Omega(t) . \end{equation*}

    Theorem 6.9. [23] Suppose that \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable functions satisfying (H_1) and (H_2). Assume that \psi is a positive and increasing function with \psi(0) = 0 and \psi' continuous on [0, \infty). Then, for t > 0 , \alpha , \beta > 0 , k > 0 we have:

    (ⅰ) J^{\beta, \psi}_{0+, k}R_{1}(t)\ J^{\alpha, \psi}_{0+, k}\Omega(t) +\ J^{\alpha, \psi}_{0+, k}Q_{2}(t)\ J^{\beta, \psi}_{0+, k}\Pi(t)\geq \ J^{\beta, \psi}_{0+, k}R _{2}(t)\ J^{\alpha, \psi}_{0+, k}Q_{2}(t)+\ J^{\alpha, \psi}_{0+, k}\Omega(t) \ J^{\beta, \psi}_{0+, k}\Pi(t).

    (ⅱ) J^{\beta, \psi}_{0+, k}Q_{1}(t)\ J^{\alpha, \psi}_{0+, k}\Pi(t)+\ J^{\alpha, \psi}_{0+, k}R_{2}(t)\ J^{\beta, \psi}_{0+, k}\Omega(t) \geq \ J^{\beta, \psi}_{0+, k}Q _{1}(t)\ J^{\alpha, \psi}_{0+, k}R_{2}(t)+\ J^{\beta, \psi}_{0+, k}\Omega(t) \ J^{\alpha, \psi}_{0+, k}\Pi(t).

    (ⅲ) J^{\alpha, \psi}_{0+, k}Q_{2}(t)_{\ k} J^{\beta, \psi}_{0+, k}R _{2}(t)+\ J^{\alpha, \psi}_{0+, k}\Omega(t) \ J^{\beta, \psi}_{0+, k}\Pi(t)\geq \ J^{\alpha, \psi}_{0+, k}Q_{2}(t)\ J^{\beta, \psi}_{0+, k}\Pi(t)+\ J^{\beta, \psi}_{0+, k}R_{2}(t)\ J^{\alpha, \psi}_{0+, k}\Omega(t).

    (ⅳ) J^{\alpha, \psi}_{0+, k}Q_{1}(t) J^{\beta, \psi}_{0+, k}R _{1}(t)+\ J^{\alpha, \psi}_{0+, k}\Omega(t) \ J^{\beta, \psi}_{0+, k}\Pi(t)\geq \ J^{\alpha, \psi}_{0+, k}Q_{1}(t)\ J^{\beta, \psi}_{0+, k}\Pi(t)+\ J^{\beta, \psi}_{0+, k}R_{1}(t)\ J^{\alpha, \psi}_{0+, k}\Omega(t).

    Theorem 6.10. [23] Suppose that \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable functions satisfying (H_{1}) and (H_{2}). Assume that \psi is a positive and increasing function on [0, \infty) such that \psi(0) = 0 and \psi' is continuous on [0, \infty). Then for all t > 0 , \alpha > 0 , k > 0 , we have

    \begin{equation*} \left\vert \frac{\psi(t)^{\frac{\alpha }{k}}}{\Gamma_k (\alpha +k)}\ J^{\alpha,\psi}_{0+,k}\Omega(t) \Pi(t)-\ J^{\alpha,\psi}_{0+,k}\Omega(t) \ J^{\alpha,\psi}_{0+,k}\Pi(t)\right\vert \leq \sqrt{T(\Omega, Q_{1},Q_{2})T(\Pi, R_{1},R_{2})}, \end{equation*}

    where

    \begin{eqnarray*} T(y,z,w)& = &\left( \ J^{\alpha,\psi}_{0+,k}w(t)-\ J^{\alpha }y(t)\right) \left( \ J^{\alpha,\psi}_{0+,k}y(t)-\ J^{\alpha,\psi}_{0+,k}z(t)\right)\\ && +\frac{\psi(t)^{\frac{\alpha }{k}}}{\Gamma_k (\alpha +k) }\ J^{\alpha,\psi}_{0+,k}z(t)y(t)- J^{\alpha,\psi}_{0+,k}z(t)\ J^{\alpha,\psi}_{0+,k}y(t) \\ && +\frac{\psi(t)^{\frac{\alpha }{k}}}{\Gamma_k (\alpha +k) }J^{\alpha,\psi}_{0+,k}w(t)y(t)- J^{\alpha,\psi}_{0+,k}w(t)\ J^{\alpha,\psi}_{0+,k}y(t) \\ && + J^{\alpha,\psi}_{0+,k}z(t)\ J^{\alpha,\psi}_{0+,k}w(t)-\frac{ t^{\frac{\alpha }{k}}}{\Gamma_k (\alpha +k)}\ J^{\alpha,\psi}_{0+,k}z(t)w(t). \end{eqnarray*}

    Definition 7.1. [24] The function \Omega is said to be L_{p, r}[x_1, x_2] if

    \begin{align} \Big(\int_{x_1}^{x_2}|\Omega(t) |^pt^rdt\Big)^{1/p} < \infty, \; \; \; 1 < p < \infty, \; \; r > 0.\end{align}

    Definition 7.2. [24] The \Gamma_k (generalized gamma function) is defined by

    \Gamma_k(z) = \lim\limits_{n\to\infty}\frac{n!k^n(nk)^{\frac{z}{k}-1}}{(z)_{nk}}, \; \; k > 0.

    Definition 7.3. [24] The function \mathcal{F}_{\rho, \lambda}^{\sigma, k} is defined by

    \begin{eqnarray*} \mathcal{F}_{\rho,\lambda}^{\sigma,k}(z)& = &\mathcal{F}_{\rho,\lambda}^{(\sigma(0), \sigma(1),\ldots,),k}\\ & = &\sum\limits_{m = 0}^{\infty}\frac{\sigma(m)}{k\Gamma_k(\rho k m+\lambda)}z^m, \; \; \; \rho,\lambda > 0, \; z\in \mathbb{C}, \; |z| < R, \end{eqnarray*}

    where R\in \mathbb{R}^+ and \sigma = (\sigma(1), \ldots, \sigma(m), \ldots) is a bounded sequence of positive real numbers.

    Definition 7.4. [24] Let k > 0, \lambda > 0, \rho > 0 and \omega\in \mathbb{R}. Assume that \psi: [x_1, x_2]\to \mathbb{R} is an increasing function for which \psi' is continuous on (x_1, x_2). Then the left and right generalized k -fractional integrals of the function \Omega with respect to \psi on [x_1, x_2] are defined by

    \begin{align} J_{\rho,\lambda,a+; \omega}^{\sigma, k, \psi}\Omega(z) = \int_{x_1}^z\frac{\psi'(t)}{(\psi(z)-\psi(t))^{1-\frac{\lambda}{k}}}\mathcal{F}_{\rho,\lambda}^{\sigma,k}[\omega(\psi(z)-\psi(t))^{\rho}]\Omega(t) dt, \; \; z > x_1 \end{align}

    and

    \begin{align} J_{\rho,\lambda,x_2-; \omega}^{\sigma, k, \psi}\Omega(z) = \int_z^{x_2}\frac{\psi'(t)}{(\psi(t)-\psi(z))^{1-\frac{\lambda}{k}}}\mathcal{F}_{\rho,\lambda}^{\sigma,k}[\omega(\psi(t)-\psi(z))^{\rho}]\Omega(t) dt, \; \; z < x_2, \end{align}

    respectively.

    Theorem 7.1. [24] Let \rho, \lambda, \delta > 0, \omega\in \mathbb{R}, \Omega\in L_{1, r}[x_1, x_2], and (H_1) holds. Then we have:

    \begin{eqnarray*} &&J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}Q_2(x)J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)+J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}Q_1(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)\\ &\ge&J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}Q_1(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}Q_2(x)+J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x). \end{eqnarray*}

    Theorem 7.2. [24] Under the assumptions of Theorem 7.1, we have:

    \begin{eqnarray*} &&J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}Q_2(x)J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)+J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}Q_1(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)\\ &\ge&J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}Q_1(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}Q_2(x)+J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x). \end{eqnarray*}

    Theorem 7.3. [24] Let \rho, \lambda, \delta > 0, \omega \in \mathbb{R}, \Omega, \Pi\in L_{1, r}[x_1, x_2] satifying (H_1) and (H_2) for all x\in [0, \infty). Then we have

    \begin{eqnarray*} &&\Big|J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)\Pi(x)\mathcal{A}_{\delta}(x)+J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)\Pi(x)\mathcal{A}_{\lambda}(x)\\ &&-J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi(x)- J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi(x)\Big|\\ &\le&\Big(\frac{\mathcal{A}_{\lambda}(x)\mathcal{A}_{\delta}(x)}{2}\Big)^2(Q_2-Q_1)( R_1- R_2), \end{eqnarray*}

    where \mathcal{A}_{\lambda} and \mathcal{A}_{\delta} are defined as

    \mathcal{A}_{\lambda}(z) = (\psi(z))^{\frac{\lambda}{k}}\mathcal{F}_{\rho,\lambda+1}^{\sigma,k}(\omega(\psi(z))^{\rho})\; \; and\; \; \mathcal{A}_{\delta} = (\psi(z))^{\frac{\delta}{k}}\mathcal{F}_{\rho,\delta+1}^{\sigma,k}(\omega(\psi(z))^{\rho}),

    respectively.

    Theorem 7.4. [24] Under the assumptions of Theorem 7.3, we have

    \begin{eqnarray*} (i)\; \; \; &&J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}Q_2(x)J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi(x)+ J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi} R_1(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)\\ &\ge& J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi} R_1(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}Q_2(x)+ J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x),\\[0.3cm] (ii)\; \; \; &&J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi} R_1(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)+ J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi(x)J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}Q_1(x)\\ &\ge& J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi(x)J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)+ J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi} R_1(x)J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}Q_1(x),\\[0.3cm] (iii)\; \; \; &&J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}Q_2(x)J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi(x)+ J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi} R_1(x)\\ &\ge& J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi(x)+ J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi} R_1(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}Q_2(x),\\[0.3cm] (iv)\; \; \; &&J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}Q_1(x)J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi(x)+ J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi} R_1(x)\\ &\ge& J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi(x)+ J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}Q_1(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi} R_1(x). \end{eqnarray*}

    Now we present certain other associated fractional integral inequalities.

    Theorem 7.5. [24] Let \alpha, \beta > 1 and a^{-1}+\beta^{-1} = 1, and \Omega, \Pi\in L_{1, r}[x_1, x_2]. Then we have:

    \begin{eqnarray*} (i)\; \; \; &&a^{-1}\mathcal{A}_{\delta}(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega^{\alpha}(x)+\beta^{-1}\mathcal{A}_{\lambda}(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi^{\beta}(x)\\ &\ge&J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi(x).\\[0.3cm] (ii)\; \; \; &&a^{-1} J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega^{\alpha}(x)J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi^{\alpha}(x)+\beta^{-1}J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi^{\beta}J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega^{\beta}(x)\\ &\ge&J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)\Pi(x)J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)\Pi(x).\\[0.3cm] (iii)\; \; \; &&a^{-1} J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega^{\alpha}(x)J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi^{\beta}(x)+\beta^{-1}J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega^{\beta}(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi^{\alpha}(x)\\ &\ge&J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)\Pi^{\alpha-1}(x)J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)\Pi^{\beta-1}(x).\\[0.3cm] (iv)\; \; \; &&a^{-1} J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega^{\alpha}(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi^{\beta}(x)+\beta^{-1}J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi^{\beta}(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega^{\alpha}(x)\\ &\ge&J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega^{\alpha-1}(x)\Pi^{\beta-1}(x)J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)\Pi(x).\\[0.3cm] (v)\; \; \; &&a^{-1} J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega^{\alpha}(x)J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi^{2}(x)+\beta^{-1}J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi^{\beta}(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)\\ &\ge&J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)\Pi(x)J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega^{2/\beta}(x)\Pi^{2/\alpha}(x).\\[0.3cm] (vi)\; \; \; &&a^{-1} J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega^{2}(x)J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi^{\beta}(x)+\beta^{-1}J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega^{\alpha}(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi^{2}(x)\\ &\ge&J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega^{2/\alpha}(x)\Pi^{2/\beta}(x)J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega^{\alpha-1}(x)\Pi^{\beta-1}(x).\\[0.3cm] (vii)\; \; \; &&a^{-1}\mathcal{A}_{\delta}(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega^{2}(x)\Pi^{\beta}(x)+\beta^{-1}\mathcal{A}_{\lambda}(x)J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi^{\beta}(x)\Omega^{2}(x)\\ &\ge&J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega^{2/\alpha}(x)\Pi^{\beta-1}(x)J_{\rho,\delta,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega^{2/\beta}(x)\Pi^{\alpha-1}(x). \end{eqnarray*}

    Theorem 7.6. [24] Assume that \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two positive and integrable functions such that

    \mu = \min\limits_{0\le t\le x}\frac{\Omega(t) }{\Omega(t) }, \; \; \; \; \mathcal{M} = \max\limits_{0\le t\le x}\frac{\Omega(t) }{\Pi(t)}.

    Then we have

    \begin{eqnarray*} (a)\; \; \; 0&\le& J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega^2(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi^2(x)\le \frac{(\mu+\mathcal{M})^2}{4\mu\mathcal{M}}\Big(J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)\Pi(x)\Big)^2,\\[0.3cm] (b)\; \; \; 0&\le& \sqrt{J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega^2(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi^2(x)}-J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)\Pi(x)\\ &\le& \frac{(\sqrt{\mathcal{M}}-\sqrt{\mu})^2}{2\sqrt{\mu\mathcal{M}}}\Big(J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)\Pi(x)\Big),\\[0.3cm] (c)\; \; \; 0&\le&J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega^2(x)J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Pi^2(x)- \Big(J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)\Pi(x)\Big)^2\\ &\le&\frac{(\mathcal{M}-\mu)^2}{4\mu\mathcal{M}}\Big(J_{\rho,\lambda,0+; \omega}^{\sigma,k,\psi}\Omega(x)\Pi(x)\Big)^2. \end{eqnarray*}

    In this section we define a generalized left sided tempered fractional integral with respect to another function. Then we present Grüss-type integral inequalities.

    Definition 8.1. [16] Suppose \Omega\in L_1[0, \infty) and the function \psi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} is positive, and increasing with continuous derivative and \psi(0) = 0. Then the Lebesgue real-valued measurable function \Omega defined on [0, \infty) is said to be in the space X_{\psi}^p, (1 \le p < \infty) for which

    \begin{align} \|\Omega\|_{X_{\psi}^p} = \Big(\int_{x_1}^{x_2}|\Omega(t) |\psi'(t)dt\Big)^{1/p} < \infty,\; \; \; 1\le p < \infty. \end{align}

    When p = \infty, then

    \|\Omega\|_{X_{\psi}^{\infty}} = {\rm ess}\sup\limits_{0\le t < \infty}[\psi'(t)\Omega(t) ].

    Definition 8.2. [25] Suppose that \kappa, \xi\in \mathbb{C} with \Re(\kappa) > 0 and \Re(\xi)\ge 0. The tempered fractional left sided integral is defined by

    \begin{align} ({}_{x_1}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega)(t) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(\kappa)}\int_{x_1}^t e^{-\xi(t-s)}(t-s)^{\kappa-1}\Omega(s)ds , \; \; \; t > x_1. \end{align}

    Definition 8.3. [26] Let \Omega be an integrable function in the space X_{\psi}^p(0, \infty) and assume that \psi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} is positive, and increasing with continuous derivative and \psi(0) = 0. Then the generalized left sided tempered fractional integral of a function \Omega with respect to another function \psi is defined by

    \begin{align}({}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega)(t) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(\kappa)}\int_0^t e^{-\xi(\psi(t)-\psi(s))}(\psi(t)-\psi(s))^{\kappa-1}\psi'(s)\Omega(s)ds , \; \; \; t > 0,\end{align}

    where \xi > 0 , \kappa\in \mathbb{C} with \Re(\kappa) > 0.

    Theorem 8.1. [27] Suppose that \Omega\in X_{\psi}^p(0, \infty) and assume that \psi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} is positive, and increasing with continuous derivative and \psi(0) = 0. Moreover, we assume that (H_1) holds. Then for t > 0, \kappa, \lambda > 0, we have

    \begin{eqnarray*} &&{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}Q_2(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Omega(t) +{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega(t) \; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}Q_1(t)\\ &\ge& {}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}Q_2(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda\xi}Q_1(t)+{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\lambda}\Omega(t) \; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Omega(t) . \end{eqnarray*}

    Theorem 8.2. [27] Assume that \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable functions satisfying (H_1) and (H_2). In addition, we suppose that \psi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} is positive, and increasing with continuous derivative and \psi(0) = 0. Then, for t > 0 and \kappa, \lambda > 0, the following inequalities hold:

    \begin{eqnarray*} (a)\; \; \; &&{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}Q_2(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Pi(t)+{}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Omega(t) \; {}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi} R_1(t)\\ &\ge&{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}Q_2(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi} R_1(t)+{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega(t) \; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Pi(t).\\[0.3cm] (b)\; \; \; &&{}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}Q_1(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Pi(t)+{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi} R_2(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Omega(t) \\ &\ge&{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}Q_1(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi} R_2(t)+{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega(t) \; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Pi(t).\\[0.3cm] (c)\; \; \; &&{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}Q_2(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi} R_2(t)+{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega(t) \; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Pi(t)\\ &\ge&{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}Q_2(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Pi(t)+{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega(t) \; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi} R_2(t).\\[0.3cm] (d)\; \; \; &&{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}Q_1(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi} R_1(t)+{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega(t) \; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Pi(t)\\ &\ge&{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}Q_1(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Pi(t)+{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega(t) \; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi} R_1(t). \end{eqnarray*}

    We present in the next certain other types of inequalities for tempered fractional integral.

    Theorem 8.3. [27] Assume that the assumptions on Theorem 8.2 hold. If p, q > 1 are such that \frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q} = 1, then, for t > 0 we have:

    \begin{eqnarray*} (i)\; \; \; &&\frac{1}{p}{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega^p(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Pi^p(t)+\frac{1}{q}{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Pi^q(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Omega^q(t)\\ &\ge&{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega(t) \Pi(t)\; {}^ {\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Pi(t)\Omega(t) .\\[0.3cm] (ii)\; \; \; &&\frac{1}{p}{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega^p(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Pi^p(t)+\frac{1}{q}{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Pi^q(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Omega^p(t)\\ &\ge&{}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Pi^{q-1}(t)\Omega^{p-1}(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Pi(t)\Omega(t) .\\[0.3cm] (iii)\; \; \; &&\frac{1}{p}{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega^p(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Pi^2(t)+\frac{1}{q}{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Pi^q(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Omega^2(t)\\ &\ge&{}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Omega^{2/p}(t)\Pi^{2/q}(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega(t) \Pi(t).\\[0.3cm] (iv)\; \; \; &&\frac{1}{p}{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega^2(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Pi^q(t)+\frac{1}{q}{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Pi^2(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Omega^p(t)\\ &\ge&{}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Omega^{p-1}(t)\Pi^{q-1}(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega^{2/p}(t)\Pi^{2/q}(t). \end{eqnarray*}

    Theorem 8.4. [27] Assume that the assumptions on Theorem 8.2 hold. If p, q > 1 are such that \frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q} = 1, then, for t > 0 we have:

    \begin{eqnarray*} (a)\; \; \; &&p\; {}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega(t) \; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Pi(t)+q\; {}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Pi(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Omega(t) \\ &\ge&{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega^p(t)\Pi^q(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Omega^q(t)\Pi^{p}(t).\\[0.3cm] (b)\; \; \; &&p\; {}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega^{p-1}(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Omega(t) \Pi^q(t)+q\; {}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega^{q-1}(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Omega^q(t)\Pi(t)\\ &\ge&{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Pi^q(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Omega^p(t).\\[0.3cm] (c)\; \; \; &&p\; {}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega(t) \; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Pi^{2/p}(t)+q\; {}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Pi^{q}(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Omega^{2/q}(t))\\ &\ge&{}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Omega^p(t)\Pi(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Pi^q(t)\Omega^2(t).\\[0.3cm] (d)\; \; \; &&p\; {}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega^{2/p}(t)\Pi^q(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Pi^{q-1}(t)+q\; {}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Pi^{q-1}(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Omega^{2/q}(t)\Pi^p(t)\\ &\ge&{}^{\psi}J^{\lambda,\xi}\Omega^2(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Pi^2(t). \end{eqnarray*}

    Theorem 8.5. [27] Assume that the assumptions on Theorem 8.2 hold. Let p, q > 1 be such that \frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q} = 1. Suppose that

    \mathcal{K} = \min\limits_{0\le s\le t}\frac{\Omega(t) }{\Pi(t)}\; \; \; \; and\; \; \; \; \mathcal{H} = \max\limits_{0\le s\le t}\frac{\Omega(t) }{\Pi(t)}.

    Then, for t > 0 we have:

    \begin{eqnarray*} (i)\; \; \; &&{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega^2(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Pi^2(t)\le \frac{(\mathcal{K}+\mathcal{H})^2}{4\mathcal{K}\mathcal{H}}\Big({}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega(t) \Pi(t)\Big)^2,\\[0.3cm] (ii)\; \; \; 0&\le&\sqrt{{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega^2(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Pi^2(t)}-\Big({}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega(t) \Pi(t)\Big)\\ &\le&\frac{\sqrt{\mathcal{H}}-\sqrt{\mathcal{K}}}{2\sqrt{\mathcal{K}\mathcal{H}}}\Big({}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega(t) \Pi(t)\Big),\\[0.3cm] (iii)\; \; \; 0&\le&{}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega^2(t)\; {}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Pi^2(t)-\Big({}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega(t) \Pi(t)\Big)^2\\ &\le&\frac{\mathcal{H}-\mathcal{K}}{4\mathcal{K}\mathcal{H}}\Big({}^{\psi}J^{\kappa,\xi}\Omega(t) \Pi(t)\Big)^2. \end{eqnarray*}

    In this section we deal with Grüss-type integral inequalities concerning conformable fractional integrals.

    We now introduced the definition of the generalized mixed \eta -conformable fractional integral.

    Definition 9.1. [28] Assume that \Omega: [x_1, x_2]\to \mathbb{R} and \alpha\in \mathbb{C}, \Re(\alpha) > 0, \rho > 0, \eta is defined on [x_1, x_2] \times [x_1, x_2]. Then the mixed left \eta -conformable generalized fractional integral of \Omega is defined by

    \begin{align} J_{\eta}^{\alpha,\rho}\Omega(x) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)}\int_{x_1+\eta(x,x_1)}^{x_2}\Omega(s)\Big(\frac{(\eta(x_2,s))^{\rho}-(x_1-x+\eta(x_2,x_1))^{\rho}}{\rho}\Big)^{\alpha-1}(\eta(x_2,s))^{\rho-1}ds, \end{align}

    and the mixed right \eta -conformable generalized fractional integral of \Omega is defined by

    \begin{align} J_{\eta}^{\alpha,\rho}\Omega(x) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)}\int_{x_1}^{x_1+\eta(x,x_1)}\Omega(s)\Big(\frac{(\eta(s,x_1))^{\rho}-(x-b+\eta(x_2,x_1))^{\rho}}{\rho}\Big)^{\alpha-1}(\eta(s,x_1))^{\rho-1}ds. \end{align}

    Theorem 9.1. [28] Assume that \Omega: [0, \infty) is an integrable function satisfying (H_1) and t > 0, \alpha, \beta, \rho > 0. Then, we have:

    J_{\eta}^{\beta,\rho}Q_1(t)J_{\eta}^{\alpha,\rho}\Omega(t) +J_{\eta}^{\alpha,\rho}Q_2(t)J_{\eta}^{\beta,\rho}\Omega(t) \ge J_{\eta}^{\alpha,\rho}Q_2(t)J_{\eta}^{\beta,\rho}Q_1(t)+ J_{\eta}^{\alpha,\rho}\Omega(t) J_{\eta}^{\beta,\rho}\Omega(t) .

    Theorem 9.2. [28] Assume that \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable function satisfying (H_1) and (H_2) and t > 0, \alpha, \beta, \rho > 0. Then we have:

    (ⅰ). J_{\eta}^{\beta, \rho} R_1(t)J_{\eta}^{\alpha, \rho}\Omega(t) +J_{\eta}^{\alpha, \rho}Q_2(t)J_{\eta}^{\beta, \rho}\Pi(t)\ge J_{\eta}^{\beta, \rho} R_1(t)J_{\eta}^{\alpha, \rho}Q_2(t)+ J_{\eta}^{\alpha, \rho}\Omega(t) J_{\eta}^{\beta, \rho}\Pi(t).

    (ⅱ). J_{\eta}^{\beta, \rho}Q_1(t)J_{\eta}^{\alpha, \rho}\Pi(t)+J_{\eta}^{\alpha, \rho} R_2(t)J_{\eta}^{\beta, \rho}\Omega(t) \ge J_{\eta}^{\beta, \rho}Q_1(t)J_{\eta}^{\alpha, \rho} R_2(t)+ J_{\eta}^{\beta, \rho}\Omega(t) J_{\eta}^{\alpha, \rho}\Pi(t).

    (ⅲ). J_{\eta}^{\alpha, \rho}Q_2(t)J_{\eta}^{\beta, \rho} R_2(t)+J_{\eta}^{\alpha, \rho}\Omega(t) J_{\eta}^{\beta, \rho}\Pi(t)\ge J_{\eta}^{\alpha, \rho}Q_2(t)J_{\eta}^{\beta, \rho}\Pi(t)+ J_{\eta}^{\beta, \rho} R_2(t)J_{\eta}^{\alpha, \rho}\Omega(t).

    (ⅳ). J_{\eta}^{\alpha, \rho}Q_1(t)J_{\eta}^{\beta, \rho} R_1(t)+J_{\eta}^{\alpha, \rho}\Omega(t) J_{\eta}^{\beta, \rho}\Pi(t)\ge J_{\eta}^{\alpha, \rho}Q_1(t)J_{\eta}^{\beta, \rho}\Pi(t)+ J_{\eta}^{\beta, \rho} R_1(t)J_{\eta}^{\alpha, \rho}\Omega(t).

    Theorem 9.3. [28] Assume that \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable function satisfying (H_1) and (H_2) and t > 0, \alpha, \beta, \rho > 0. Then:

    \begin{eqnarray*} &&\Big|J_{\eta}^{\alpha,\rho}\Omega(t) \Pi(t)\Big\{\frac{(\eta(x_2,x_1+\eta(t,x_1))^{\rho}-(x_1-t+\eta(x_2,x_1))^{\rho})^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)\rho^{\alpha}}-\frac{(\eta(x_2,x_1)^{\rho}-(x_1-t+\eta(x_2,x_1))^{\rho})^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)\rho^{\alpha}}\Big\}\\ &&-J_{\eta}^{\alpha,\rho}\Omega(t) J_{\eta}^{\alpha,\rho}\Pi(t)\Big|\\ &\le& \sqrt{T(\Omega, Q_1,Q_2)T(\Pi, R_1, R_2)}, \end{eqnarray*}

    where

    \begin{eqnarray*} &&T(u,v,w)\\ & = &(J_{\eta}^{\alpha,\rho}w(t)-J_{\eta}^{\alpha,\rho}u(t))(J_{\eta}^{\alpha,\rho}u(t)-J_{\eta}^{\alpha,\rho}v(t))+J_{\eta}^{\alpha,\rho}v(t)u(t)\\ &&\times \Big\{\frac{(\eta(x_2,x_1+\eta(t,x_1))^{\rho}-(x_1-t+\eta(x_2,x_1))^{\rho})^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)\rho^{\alpha}}-\frac{(\eta(x_2,x_1)^{\rho}-(x_1-t+\eta(x_2,x_1))^{\rho})^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)\rho^{\alpha}}\Big\}\\ &&-J_{\eta}^{\alpha,\rho}v(t)J_{\eta}^{\alpha,\rho}u(t)\\ &&+J_{\eta}^{\alpha,\rho}w(t)\Big\{\frac{(\eta(x_2,x_1+\eta(t,x_1))^{\rho}-(x_1-t+\eta(x_2,x_1))^{\rho})^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)\rho^{\alpha}}-\frac{(\eta(x_2,x_1)^{\rho}-(x_1-t+\eta(x_2,x_1))^{\rho})^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)\rho^{\alpha}}\Big\}\\ &&-J_{\eta}^{\alpha,\rho}w(t)J_{\eta}^{\alpha,\rho}u(t)+J_{\eta}^{\alpha,\rho}v(t)J_{\eta}^{\alpha,\rho}w(t)\\ &&-J_{\eta}^{\alpha,\rho}v(t)w(t)\Big\{\frac{(\eta(x_2,x_1+\eta(t,x_1))^{\rho}-(x_1-t+\eta(x_2,x_1))^{\rho})^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)\rho^{\alpha}}-\frac{(\eta(x_2,x_1)^{\rho}-(x_1-t+\eta(x_2,x_1))^{\rho})^{\alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)\rho^{\alpha}}\Big\}. \end{eqnarray*}

    The (k, s) -fractional conformable integral operator is defined as

    Definition 9.2. [29] Let \Omega be an integrable function, \alpha\in \mathbb{C}, \Re(\alpha) > 0 and s > 0. The (k, s) -fractional conformable integral operator is defined as

    \begin{align} I_{k}^{\alpha,s}\Omega(t) = \frac{s^{1-\frac{\alpha}{k}}}{k\Gamma_k(\alpha)}\int_{x_1}^t\Big[(t-x_1)^s-(x-x_1)^s\Big]^{\frac{\alpha}{k}-1}(x-x_1)^{s-1}\Omega(x)ds, \; \; t\in [x_1, x_2]. \end{align}

    Here, we present Grüss type inequalities involving the (k, s) -fractional conformable integral I_{k}^{\alpha, s} defined in Definition 9.2.

    Theorem 9.4. [29] Assume that \Omega: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} is an integrable function satisfying (H_1) and k, s, \alpha, \beta > 0. Then we have:

    I_{k}^{\beta,s}Q_1(t)I_{k}^{\alpha,s}\Omega(t) +I_{k}^{\alpha,s}Q_2(t)I_{k}^{\beta,s}\Omega(t) \ge I_{k}^{\alpha,s}Q_2(t)I_{k}^{\beta,s}Q_1(t)+I_{k}^{\alpha,s}\Omega(t) I_{k}^{\beta,s}\Omega(t) .

    Theorem 9.5. [29] Assume that \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable function satisfyingt (H_1) and (H_2) and k, s, \alpha, \beta > 0. Then we have:

    (ⅰ). I_{k}^{\beta, s} R_1(t)I_{k}^{\alpha, s}\Omega(t) +I_{k}^{\alpha, s}Q_2(t)I_{k}^{\beta, s}\Pi(t)\ge I_{k}^{\beta, s} R_1(t)I_{k}^{\beta, s}Q_2(t)+I_{k}^{\alpha, s}\Omega(t) I_{k}^{\beta, s}\Pi(t).

    (ⅱ). I_{k}^{\beta, s}Q_1(t)I_{k}^{\alpha, s}\Pi(t)+I_{k}^{\alpha, s} R_2(t)I_{k}^{\beta, s}\Omega(t) \ge I_{k}^{\beta, s}Q_1(t)I_{k}^{\beta, s} R_2(t)+I_{k}^{\alpha, s}\Pi(t)I_{k}^{\beta, s}\Omega(t).

    (ⅲ). I_{k}^{\alpha, s}Q_2(t)I_{k}^{\beta, s} R_2(t)+I_{k}^{\alpha, s}\Omega(t) I_{k}^{\beta, s}\Pi(t)\ge I_{k}^{\alpha, s}Q_2(t)I_{k}^{\beta, s}\Pi(t)+I_{k}^{\beta, s} R_2(t)I_{k}^{\alpha, s}\Omega(t).

    (ⅳ). I_{k}^{\alpha, s}Q_1(t)I_{k}^{\beta, s} R_1(t)+I_{k}^{\alpha, s}\Omega(t) I_{k}^{\beta, s}\Pi(t)\ge I_{k}^{\alpha, s}Q_1(t)I_{k}^{\beta, s}\Pi(t)+I_{k}^{\beta, s} R_1(t)I_{k}^{\alpha, s}\Omega(t).

    Theorem 9.6. [29] Assume that \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable function satisfyingt (H_1) and (H_2) and k, s, \alpha > 0. Then we have:

    \Big|\frac{s^{-\frac{\alpha}{k}}(t-x_1)^{\frac{s\alpha}{k}}}{\Gamma_k(\alpha+k)}I_{k}^{\alpha,s}(\Omega(t) \Pi(t))-I_{k}^{\alpha,s}\Omega(t) I_{k}^{\alpha,s}\Pi(t)\Big|\ge \sqrt{T_k(\Omega, Q_1,Q_2)T_k(\Pi, R_1, R_2)},

    where

    \begin{eqnarray*} T_k(x,y,z)& = &(I_{k}^{\alpha,s}z(t)-I_{k}^{\alpha,s}x(t))(I_{k}^{\alpha,s}x(t)-I_{k}^{\alpha,s}y(t))\\ &&+\frac{s^{-\frac{\alpha}{k}}(t-x_1)^{\frac{s\alpha}{k}}}{\Gamma_k(\alpha+k)}I_{k}^{\alpha,s}(y(t)x(t))-I_{k}^{\alpha,s}y(t)I_{k}^{\alpha,s}x(t)\\ &&+\frac{s^{-\frac{\alpha}{k}}(t-x_1)^{\frac{s\alpha}{k}}}{\Gamma_k(\alpha+k)}I_{k}^{\alpha,s}(z(t)x(t))-I_{k}^{\alpha,s}z(t)I_{k}^{\alpha,s}x(t)\\ &&-\frac{s^{-\frac{\alpha}{k}}(t-x_1)^{\frac{s\alpha}{k}}}{\Gamma_k(\alpha+k)}I_{k}^{\alpha,s}(y(t)z(t))+I_{k}^{\alpha,s}y(t)I_{k}^{\alpha,s}z(t). \end{eqnarray*}

    Definition 9.3. [30] Let \lambda\in \mathbb{C}, \Re(\lambda) > 0. We define the left and right sided fractional conformable integral operators as

    \begin{align} {}^{\lambda}_{x_1}J^{\mu}\Omega(x) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)}\int_{x_1}^x\Big(\frac{(x-x_1)^{\mu}-(t-x_1)^{\mu}}{\mu}\Big)^{\lambda-1}\frac{\Omega(t) }{(t-x_1)^{1-\mu}}dt, \end{align}
    \begin{align} {}^{\lambda}_{x_2}J^{\mu}\Omega(x) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(\lambda)}\int_x^{x_2}\Big(\frac{(x_2-x)^{\mu}-(x_2-t)^{\mu}}{\mu}\Big)^{\lambda-1}\frac{\Omega(t) }{(x_2-t)^{1-\mu}}dt. \end{align}

    For the results in this section we consider x_1 = 0.

    Theorem 9.7. [30] Suppose that \Omega: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} is an integrable function satisfying (H_1). Then for x, \alpha, \beta > 0 we have:

    {}^{\beta}J^{\mu}Q_1(t)\; {}^{\alpha}J^{\mu}\Omega(t) +{}^{\alpha}J^{\mu}Q_2(t)\; {}^{\beta}J^{\mu}\Omega(t) \ge {}^{\alpha}J^{\mu}Q_2(t)\; {}^{\beta}J^{\mu}Q_1(t)+{}^{\alpha}J^{\mu}\Omega(t) \; {}^{\beta}J^{\mu}\Omega(t).

    Theorem 9.8. [30] Assume that \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable functions satisfying (H_1) and (H_2). Then for x, \alpha, \beta > 0 we have:

    (1) ^{\beta}J^{\mu} R_1(t)\; ^{\alpha}J^{\mu}\Omega(t) +^{\alpha}J^{\mu}Q_2(t)\; ^{\beta}J^{\mu}\Pi(t)\ge ^{\alpha}J^{\mu}Q_2(t)\; ^{\beta}J^{\mu} R_1(t)+^{\alpha}J^{\mu}\Omega(t) \; ^{\beta}J^{\mu}\Pi(t).

    (2) ^{\beta}J^{\mu}Q_1(t)\; ^{\alpha}J^{\mu}\Pi(t)+^{\alpha}J^{\mu} R_2(t)\; ^{\beta}J^{\mu}\Omega(t) \ge ^{\alpha}J^{\mu}Q_1(t)\; ^{\beta}J^{\mu} R_2(t)+^{\alpha}J^{\mu}\Omega(t) \; ^{\beta}J^{\mu}\Pi(t).

    (3) ^{\alpha}J^{\mu}Q_2(t)\; ^{\beta}J^{\mu} R_2(t)+^{\alpha}J^{\mu}\Omega(t) \; ^{\beta}J^{\mu}\Pi(t)\ge ^{\alpha}J^{\mu}Q_2(t)\; ^{\beta}J^{\mu}\Pi(t)+^{\beta}J^{\mu} R_2(t)\; ^{\alpha}J^{\mu}\Omega(t).

    (4) ^{\alpha}J^{\mu}Q_1(t)\; ^{\beta}J^{\mu} R_1(t)+^{\alpha}J^{\mu}\Omega(t) \; ^{\beta}J^{\mu}\Pi(t)\ge ^{\alpha}J^{\mu}Q_1(t)\; ^{\beta}J^{\mu}\Pi(t)+^{\alpha}J^{\mu}\Omega(t) \; ^{\beta}J^{\mu} R_1(t).

    Theorem 9.9. [30] Assume that \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable functions satisfying (H_1) and (H_2). Then for x, \alpha, \beta > 0 we have:

    \Bigg|\frac{t^{\mu \alpha}}{\mu^{\alpha}\Gamma(\alpha+1)} {}^{\alpha}J^{\mu}\Omega(t) \Pi(t)-{}^{\alpha}J^{\mu}\Omega(t) \; {}^{\alpha}J^{\mu}\Pi(t)\Bigg|\le \sqrt{T(\Omega, Q_1, Q_2)T(\Pi, R_1 R_2)},

    where

    \begin{eqnarray*} T(y,z,w)& = &({}^{\alpha}J^{\mu}w(t)-{}^{\alpha}J^{\mu}y(t))({}^{\alpha}J^{\mu}y(t)-{}^{\alpha}J^{\mu}z(t))\\ &&+\frac{t^{\mu \alpha}}{\mu^{\alpha}\Gamma(\alpha+1)}{}^{\alpha}J^{\mu}z(t)y(t)-{}^{\alpha}J^{\mu}z(t)\; {}^{\alpha}J^{\mu}y(t)\\ &&+\frac{t^{\mu \alpha}}{\mu^{\alpha}\Gamma(\alpha+1)}{}^{\alpha}J^{\mu}w(t)y(t)-{}^{\alpha}J^{\mu}w(t)\; {}^{\alpha}J^{\mu}y(t)\\ &&+{}^{\alpha}J^{\mu}z(t)\; {}^{\alpha}J^{\mu}w(t)-\frac{t^{\mu \alpha}}{\mu^{\alpha}\Gamma(\alpha+1)}{}^{\alpha}J^{\mu}z(t)w(t). \end{eqnarray*}

    Definition 10.1. [31] The proportional fractional integrals, left- and right-sided, of a function \Omega of order \alpha and \sigma\in (0, 1] are defined by

    \begin{align} I^{\alpha,\sigma}_{x_1}\Omega(t) = \frac{1}{\sigma^{ \alpha}\Gamma(\alpha)}\int_{x_1}^te^{\frac{\sigma-1}{\sigma}(t-s)}(t-s)^{\alpha-1} \Omega(s)ds, \end{align}

    and

    \begin{align} I^{\alpha,\sigma}_{x_2}\Omega(t) = \frac{1}{\sigma^{\alpha}\Gamma(\alpha)}\int_t^{x_2}e^{\frac{\sigma-1}{\sigma}(s-t)}(s-t)^{\alpha-1} \Omega(s)ds , \end{align}

    where \alpha\in \mathbb{C}, \Re(\alpha) > 0.

    In what follows, we present Grüss-type inequality with the help of the proportional fractional integral defined above.

    Theorem 10.1. [31] Assume that \Omega: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} is an integrable function satisfying (H_1). Then:

    I^{\beta,\sigma}Q_1(t)I^{\alpha,\sigma}\Omega(t) +I^{\alpha,\sigma}Q_2(t)I^{\beta,\sigma}\Omega(t) \ge I^{\alpha,\sigma}Q_2(t)I^{\beta,\sigma}Q_1(t)+I^{\beta,\sigma}\Omega(t) I^{\beta,\sigma}\Omega(t) .

    Theorem 10.2. [31] Let \sigma\in (0, 1]. Suppose that \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable functions satisfying (H_1) and (H_2). Then the following inequalities hold:

    (a) I^{\beta, \sigma} R_1(t)I^{\alpha, \sigma}\Omega(t) +I^{\alpha, \sigma}Q_2(t)I^{\beta, \sigma}\Pi(t)\ge I^{\beta, \sigma} R_1(t)I^{\alpha, \sigma}Q_2(t)+I^{\alpha, \sigma}\Omega(t) I^{\beta, \sigma}\Pi(t).

    (b) I^{\beta, \sigma}Q_1(t)I^{\alpha, \sigma}\Pi(t)+I^{\alpha, \sigma} R_2(t)I^{\beta, \sigma}\Omega(t) \ge I^{\beta, \sigma}Q_1(t)I^{\alpha, \sigma} R_2(t)+I^{\beta, \sigma}\Omega(t) I^{\alpha, \sigma}\Pi(t).

    (c) I^{\alpha, \sigma}Q_2(t)I^{\beta, \sigma} R_2(t)+I^{\alpha, \sigma}\Omega(t) I^{\beta, \sigma}\Pi(t)\ge I^{\alpha, \sigma}Q_2(t)I^{\beta, \sigma}\Pi(t)+I^{\beta, \sigma} R_2(t)I^{\alpha, \sigma}\Omega(t).

    (d) I^{\alpha, \sigma}Q_1(t)I^{\beta, \sigma} R_1(t)+I^{\alpha, \sigma}\Omega(t) I^{\beta, \sigma}\Pi(t)\ge I^{\alpha, \sigma}Q_1(t)I^{\beta, \sigma}\Pi(t)+I^{\beta, \sigma} R_1(t)I^{\alpha, \sigma}\Omega(t).

    Theorem 10.3. [31] Let x > 0, \alpha, \beta > 0, and p, q > 1 satisfying \frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} = 1, and \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} be two positive integrable functions. Then we have:

    \begin{eqnarray*} (i)\; \; \; &&\frac{1}{p}J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Omega^p(x)\; J_{0+}^{\beta,\sigma}\Pi^p(x)+\frac{1}{q}J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Pi^q(x)\; J_{0+}^{\beta,\sigma}\Omega^q(x)\\ &\ge& \Big(J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Omega(x)\Pi(x)\Big)\Big(J_{0+}^{\beta,\sigma}\Omega(x)\Pi(x)\Big).\\[0.3cm] (ii)\; \; \; &&\frac{1}{p}J_{0+}^{\beta,\sigma}\Pi^q(x)\; J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Omega^p(x)+\frac{1}{q}J_{0+}^{\beta,\sigma}\Omega^p(x)\; J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Pi^q(x)\\ &\ge& \Big(J_{0+}^{\beta,\sigma}\Omega^{p-1}\Pi^{q-1}(x)\Big)\Big(J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Omega(x) \Pi(x)\Big).\\[0.3cm] (iii)\; \; \; &&\frac{1}{p}J_{0+}^{\beta,\sigma}\Pi^2(x)\; J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Omega^p(x)+\frac{1}{q}J_{0+}^{\beta,\sigma}\Omega^2(x)\; J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Pi^q(x)\\ &\ge& \Big(J_{0+}^{\beta,\sigma}\Omega^{2/q}(x)\Pi^{2/p}(x)\Big)\Big(J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Omega(x)\Pi(x)\Big).\\[0.3cm] (iv)\; \; \; &&\frac{1}{p}J_{0+}^{\beta,\sigma}\Pi^q(x)\; J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Omega^2(x)+\frac{1}{q}J_{0+}^{\beta,\sigma}\Omega^p(x)\; J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Pi^2(x)\\ &\ge& \Big(J_{0+}^{\beta,\sigma}\Omega^{p-1}(x)\Pi^{q-1}(x)\Big)\Big(J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Omega^{2/p}(x)\Pi^{2/p}(x)\Big). \end{eqnarray*}

    Theorem 10.4. [31] Let the assumptions of Theorem 10.1 be hold. In addition, let

    \mu = \min\limits_{0\le t\le x}\frac{\Omega(t) }{\Pi(t)}\; \; \; and\; \; \; \mathcal{M} = \max\limits_{0\le t\le x}\frac{\Omega(t) }{\Pi(t)}.

    Then, we have:

    \begin{eqnarray*} (a)\; \; \; 0&\le&\Big(J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Omega^2(x)\; J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Pi^2(x)\Big)\le \frac{(\mathcal{M}+\mu)^2}{4\mu\mathcal{M}}\Big(J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Omega(x) \Pi(x)\Big)^2.\\[0.3cm] (b)\; \; \; 0&\le&\sqrt{J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Omega^2(x)\; J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Pi^2(x)}-\Big(J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Omega(x)\Pi(x)\Big)\\ &\le&\frac{(\sqrt{\mathcal{M}}-\sqrt{\mu})^2}{2\sqrt{\mu\mathcal{M}}}\Big(J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Omega(x) \Pi(x)\Big).\\[0.3cm] (c)\; \; \; 0&\le&J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Omega^2(x)\; J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Pi^2(x)-\Big(J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Omega(x) \Pi(x)\Big)^2\\ &\le&\frac{(\mathcal{M}-\mu)^2}{4\mu\mathcal{M}}\Big(J_{0+}^{\alpha,\sigma}\Omega(x) \Pi(x)\Big)^2. \end{eqnarray*}

    Definition 10.2. [32] Assume that \Omega is integrable and \psi is a strictly increasing continuous function on [x_1, x_2]. For \sigma\in (0, 1], \alpha\in \mathbb{C}, \Re(\alpha)\ge 0, k\in \mathbb{R}^+, we define the left- and right-sided proportional k -fractional integrals, respectively, as

    \begin{align} {}^{k,\psi}I^{\alpha,\sigma}_{x_1}\Omega(t) = \frac{1}{\sigma^{\frac{\alpha}{k}}k\Gamma_k(\alpha)}\int_{x_1}^te^{\frac{\sigma-1}{\sigma}(\psi(t)-\psi(s))}(\psi(t)-\psi(s))^{\frac{\alpha}{k}-1}\psi'(s)\Omega(s)ds, \end{align}

    and

    \begin{align} {}^{k,\psi}I^{\alpha,\sigma}_{x_2}\Omega(t) = \frac{1}{\sigma^{\frac{\alpha}{k}}k\Gamma_k(\alpha)}\int_t^{x_2}e^{\frac{\sigma-1}{\sigma}(\psi(s)-\psi(t))}(\psi(s)-\psi(t))^{\frac{\alpha}{k}-1}\psi'(s)\Omega(s)ds. \end{align}

    In what follows, we present Grüss-type inequality with the help of the generalized k -fractional integral.

    Theorem 10.5. [32] Let \Omega, \Pi:[0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} be positive integrable functions. satisfying (H_1), (H_2) with positive integrable functions Q_1, Q_2, R_1, R_2 and \psi be a strictly increasing continuous function. Tthen the following inequality also holds:

    \begin{eqnarray*} &&\Bigg|\frac{\frac{1}{\alpha}[\psi(t)-\psi(0))^{\frac{\alpha}{k}}}{\sigma^{\frac{\alpha}{k}}\Gamma_k(\alpha)}{}^{k,\psi}I^{\alpha,\sigma}\Omega(t) \Pi(t)-{}^{k,\psi}I^{\alpha,\sigma}\Omega(t) \; {}^{k,\psi}I^{\alpha,\sigma}\Pi(t)\Bigg|\\ &\le&\sqrt{T(\Omega, Q_1,Q_2)(t)T(\Pi, R_1, R_2)(t)}, \end{eqnarray*}

    where

    T(u,v,w)(t) = \frac{\frac{1}{\alpha}[\psi(t)-\psi(0))^{\frac{\alpha}{k}}}{4\sigma^{\frac{\alpha}{k}}\Gamma_k(\alpha)}\frac{\Big({}^{k,\psi}I^{\alpha,\sigma}\{(v+w)u\}(t)\Big)^2}{{}^{k,\psi}I^{\alpha,\sigma}\Omega(t) \Pi(t)}-\Big({}^{k,\psi}I^{\alpha,\sigma}(u)(t)\Big)^2.

    Definition 11.1. A function \Omega is said to be L_{p, s}[x_1, x_2] if

    \begin{align} \Big(\int_{x_1}^{x_2}|\Omega(t) |^pt^s dt\Big)^{1/p} < \infty, \; \; 1\le p < \infty, \; \; s\ge 0. \end{align}

    Definition 11.2. [33] Let \Omega\in L_{1, s}[0, \infty). The Riemann-Liouville generalized fractional integral of \Omega of order \alpha > 0 and s\ge 0 is defined by

    \begin{align} I^{\alpha,s}\Omega(t) = \frac{(s+1)^{1- \alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha)}\int_{x_1}^t(t^{s+1}-\tau^{s+1})^{\alpha-1}\tau^s\Omega(\tau)d\tau, \; \; t\in [x_1, x_2]. \end{align}

    In this section, we present some Grüss type inequalities via the fractional integral defined in Definition 11.2.

    Theorem 11.1. [34] Let \Omega\in L_{1, s}[x_1, x_2] satisfying (H_1) and k > 0, s\ge 0, \alpha, \beta > 0. Then we have the following inequality:

    I^{\beta,s}Q_1(t)I^{\alpha,s}\Omega(t) +I^{\alpha,s}Q_2(t)I^{\beta,s}\Omega(t) \ge I^{\alpha,s}Q_2(t)I^{\beta,s}Q_1(t)+I^{\alpha,s}\Omega(t) I^{\beta,s}\Omega(t) .

    Theorem 11.2. [34] Assume that \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable functions satisfying (H_1) and (H_2) and k > 0, s\ge 0, \alpha, \beta > 0. Then we have the following inequalities:

    (ⅰ) I^{\beta, s} R_1(t)I^{\alpha, s}\Omega(t) +I^{\alpha, s}Q_2(t)I^{\beta, s}\Pi(t)\ge I^{\beta, s} R_1(t)I^{\alpha, s}Q_2(t)+I^{\alpha, s}\Omega(t) I^{\beta, s}\Pi(t).

    (ⅱ) I^{\beta, s}Q_1(t)I^{\alpha, s}\Pi(t)+I^{\alpha, s} R_2(t)I^{\beta, s}\Omega(t) \ge I^{\beta, s}Q_1(t)I^{\alpha, s} R_2(t)+I^{\alpha, s}\Pi(t)I^{\beta, s}\Omega(t).

    (ⅲ) I^{\alpha, s}Q_2(t)I^{\beta, s} R_2(t)+I^{\alpha, s}\Omega(t) I^{\beta, s}\Pi(t)\ge I^{\alpha, s}Q_2(t)I^{\beta, s}\Pi(t)+I^{\beta, s} R_2(t)I^{\alpha, s}\Omega(t).

    (ⅳ) I^{\alpha, s}Q_1(t)I^{\beta, s} R_1(t)+I^{\alpha, s}\Omega(t) I^{\beta, s}\Pi(t)\ge I^{\alpha, s}Q_1(t)I^{\beta, s}\Pi(t)+I^{\beta, s} R_1(t)I^{\alpha, s}\Omega(t).

    Theorem 11.3. [35] Under the assumptions of Theorem 11.2 we have for all t\in [x_1, x_2], s\ge 0 and \alpha > 0

    \Bigg|\frac{(s+1)^{- \alpha}t^{(s+1) \alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}I^{\alpha,s}\Omega(t) \Pi(t)-I^{\alpha,s}\Omega(t) I^{\alpha,s}\Pi(t)\Bigg|\le \sqrt{T(\Omega, Q_1,Q_1)T(\Pi, R_1, R_2)},

    where

    \begin{eqnarray*} T(x,y,z)& = &(I^{\alpha,s}z(t)-I^{\alpha,s}x(t))(I^{\alpha,s}x(t)-I^{\alpha,s}y(t))\\ &&+\frac{(s+1)^{- \alpha}t^{(s+1) \alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}I^{\alpha,s}y(t)x(t)-I^{\alpha,s}y(t)I^{\alpha,s}x(t)\\ &&+\frac{(s+1)^{- \alpha}t^{(s+1) \alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}I^{\alpha,s}z(t)x(t)-I^{\alpha,s}z(t)I^{\alpha,s}x(t)\\ &&-\frac{(s+1)^{- \alpha}t^{(s+1) \alpha}}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}I^{\alpha,s}y(t)z(t)+I^{\alpha,s}y(t)I^{\alpha,s}x(t). \end{eqnarray*}

    Now we define (k, s) -Riemann-Liouville fractional integral.

    Definition 11.3. [33] Let \Omega: [x_1, x_2]\to \mathbb{R} be a continuous function. Then (k, s) -Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of \Omega of order \alpha > 0 is defined by

    \begin{align} J_{x_1,k}^{\alpha,s}\Omega(t) = \frac{(s+1)^{1-\frac{\alpha}{k}}}{k\Gamma_k(\alpha)}\int_{x_1}^t(t^{s+1}-\tau^{s+1})^{\frac{\alpha}{k}-1}\tau^s\Omega(\tau)d\tau, \; \; t\in [x_1, x_2],\end{align}

    where k > 0, s\in \mathbb{R}\setminus\{-1\}.

    Now, for the generalized (k, s) -Riemann-Liouville fractional integral defined above, we give some Grüss type inequalities.

    Theorem 11.4. [35] Let \Omega\in L_{1, s}[x_1, x_2] satisfying (H_1) and k > 0, s\ge 0, \alpha, \beta > 0. Then we have the following inequality:

    J_{x_1,k}^{\beta,s}Q_1(t)J_{x_1,k}^{\alpha,s}\Omega(t) +J_{x_1,k}^{\alpha,s}Q_2(t)\Omega(t) \ge J_{x_1,k}^{\alpha,s}Q_2(t)J_{x_1,k}^{\beta,s}Q_1(t)+J_{x_1,k}^{\alpha,s}\Omega(t) J_{x_1,k}^{\beta,s}\Omega(t) .

    Theorem 11.5. [35] Assume that \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable functions satisfying (H_1) and (H_2) and k > 0, s\ge 0, \alpha, \beta > 0. Then we have:

    (ⅰ) J_{x_1, k}^{\beta, s} R_1(t)J_{x_1, k}^{\alpha, s}\Omega(t) +J_{x_1, k}^{\alpha, s}Q_2(t)J_{x_1, k}^{\beta, s}\Pi(t)\ge J_{x_1, k}^{\beta, s} R_1(t)J_{x_1, k}^{\alpha, s}Q_2(t)+J_{x_1, k}^{\alpha, s}\Omega(t) J_{x_1, k}^{\beta, s}\Pi(t).

    (ⅱ) J_{x_1, k}^{\beta, s}Q_1(t)J_{x_1, k}^{\alpha, s}\Pi(t)+J_{x_1, k}^{\alpha, s} R_2(t)J_{x_1, k}^{\beta, s}\Omega(t) \ge J_{x_1, k}^{\beta, s}Q_1(t)J_{x_1, k}^{\alpha, s} R_2(t)+J_{x_1, k}^{\alpha, s}\Pi(t)J_{x_1, k}^{\beta, s}\Omega(t).

    (ⅲ) J_{x_1, k}^{\alpha, s}Q_2(t)J_{x_1, k}^{\beta, s} R_2(t)+J_{x_1, k}^{\alpha, s}\Omega(t) J_{x_1, k}^{\beta, s}\Pi(t)\ge J_{x_1, k}^{\alpha, s}Q_2(t)J_{x_1, k}^{\beta, s}\Pi(t)+J_{x_1, k}^{\beta, s} R_2(t)J_{x_1, k}^{\alpha, s}\Omega(t).

    (ⅳ) J_{x_1, k}^{\alpha, s}Q_1(t)J_{x_1, k}^{\beta, s} R_1(t)+J_{x_1, k}^{\alpha, s}\Omega(t) J_{x_1, k}^{\beta, s}\Pi(t)\ge J_{x_1, k}^{\alpha, s}Q_1(t)J_{x_1, k}^{\beta, s}\Pi(t)+J_{x_1, k}^{\beta, s} R_1(t)J_{x_1, k}^{\alpha, s}\Omega(t).

    Theorem 11.6. [35] Under the assumptions of Theorem 11.5 we have for all t\in [x_1, x_2], s\ge 0 and \alpha > 0

    \Bigg|\frac{(s+1)^{-\frac{\alpha}{k}}t^{(s+1)\frac{\alpha}{k}}}{\Gamma_k(\alpha+k)}J_{x_1,k}^{\alpha,s}\Omega(t) \Pi(t)-J_{x_1,k}^{\alpha,s}\Omega(t) J_{x_1,k}^{\alpha,s}\Pi(t)\Bigg|\le \sqrt{T_k^s(\Omega,Q_1,Q_1)T_k^s(\Pi, R_1, R_2)},

    where

    \begin{eqnarray*} T_k^s(x,y,z)& = &(J_{x_1,k}^{\alpha,s}z(t)-J_{x_1,k}^{\alpha,s}x(t))(J_{x_1,k}^{\alpha,s}x(t)-J_{x_1,k}^{\alpha,s}y(t))\\ &&+\frac{(s+1)^{-\frac{\alpha}{k}}t^{(s+1)\frac{\alpha}{k}}}{\Gamma_k(\alpha+k)}J_{x_1,k}^{\alpha,s}y(t)x(t)-J_{x_1,k}^{\alpha,s}y(t)J_{x_1,k}^{\alpha,s}x(t)\\ &&+\frac{(s+1)^{-\frac{\alpha}{k}}t^{(s+1)\frac{\alpha}{k}}}{\Gamma_k(\alpha+k)}J_{x_1,k}^{\alpha,s}z(t)x(t)-J_{x_1,k}^{\alpha,s}z(t)J_{x_1,k}^{\alpha,s}x(t)\\ &&-\frac{(s+1)^{-\frac{\alpha}{k}}t^{(s+1)\frac{\alpha}{k}}}{\Gamma_k(\alpha+k)}J_{x_1,k}^{\alpha,s}y(t)z(t)+J_{x_1,k}^{\alpha,s}y(t)J_{x_1,k}^{\alpha,s}x(t). \end{eqnarray*}

    In this section, we present the Grüss-type fractional integral inequalities involving the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional integral.

    Definition 12.1. [36] Assume that \alpha\in \mathbb{R} such that 0 < \alpha < 1. We define the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional integral of a function \Omega of order \alpha by

    \begin{align} I_{0,t}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) = \frac{1}{\alpha}\int_0^t e^{-\big(\frac{1-\alpha}{\alpha}\big)(t-s)}\Omega(s)ds . \end{align}

    Theorem 12.1. [37] Assume that \Omega: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} is an integrable function satisfying (H_1). Then, for t > 0 , \alpha, \beta > 0 , k > 0 , we have:

    \begin{equation*} I_{0,t}^{\beta}Q_{1}(t) I_{0,t}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) +\ I_{0,t}^{\alpha}Q_{2}(t) I_{0,t}^{\beta}\Omega(t) \geq \ I_{0,t}^{\alpha}Q_{2}(t) I_{0,t}^{\beta}Q_{1}(t) +\ I_{0,t}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) I_{0,t}^{\beta}\Omega(t) . \end{equation*}

    Theorem 12.2. [37] Suppose that \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable functions satisfying (H_1) and (H_2). Then, for t > 0 , \alpha , \beta > 0 , k > 0 we have the inequalities:

    (a) I_{0, t}^{\beta}R_{1}(t)\ I_{0, t}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) +\ I_{0, t}^{\alpha}Q_{2}(t)\ I_{0, t}^{\beta}\Pi(t)\geq \ I_{0, t}^{\beta}R _{1}(t)\ I_{0, t}^{\alpha}Q_{2}(t)+\ I_{0, t}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) \ I_{0, t}^{\beta}\Pi(t).

    (b) I_{0, t}^{\beta}Q_{1}(t)\ I_{0, t}^{\alpha}\Pi(t)+\ I_{0, t}^{\alpha}R_{2}(t)\ I_{0, t}^{\beta}\Omega(t) \geq \ I_{0, t}^{\beta}Q _{1}(t)\ I_{0, t}^{\alpha}R_{2}(t)+\ I_{0, t}^{\beta}\Omega(t) \ I_{0, t}^{\alpha}\Pi(t).

    (c) I_{0, t}^{\alpha}Q_{2}(t)_{\ k} I_{0, t}^{\beta}R _{2}(t)+\ I_{0, t}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) \ I_{0, t}^{\beta}\Pi(t)\geq \ I_{0, t}^{\alpha}Q_{2}(t)\ I_{0, t}^{\beta}\Pi(t)+\ I_{0, t}^{\beta}R_{2}(t)\ I_{0, t}^{\alpha}\Omega(t).

    (d) I_{0, t}^{\alpha}Q_{1}(t) I_{0, t}^{\beta}R _{1}(t)+\ I_{0, t}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) \ I_{0, t}^{\beta}\Pi(t)\geq \ I_{0, t}^{\alpha}Q_{1}(t)\ I_{0, t}^{\beta}\Pi(t)+\ I_{0, t}^{\beta}R_{1}(t)\ I_{0, t}^{\alpha}\Omega(t).

    Theorem 12.3. [37] Assume that \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable functions satisfying (H_{1}) and (H_{2}). Then for all t > 0 , \alpha > 0 , we have:

    \begin{equation*} \left\vert \Big(\frac{1}{1-\alpha}\Big[1-e^{-\big(\frac{1-\alpha}{\alpha}\big)t}\Big]\Big)\ I_{0,t}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) \Pi(t)-\ I_{0,t}^{\alpha}\Omega(t) \ I_{0,t}^{\alpha}\Pi(t)\right\vert \leq \sqrt{T(\Omega, Q_{1},Q_{2})T(\Pi, R_{1},R_{2})}, \end{equation*}

    where

    \begin{eqnarray*} T(y,z,w)& = &\left( \ I_{0,t}^{\alpha}w(t)-\ J^{\alpha }y(t)\right) \left( \ I_{0,t}^{\alpha}y(t)-\ I_{0,t}^{\alpha}z(t)\right)\\ && +\Big(\frac{1}{1-\alpha}\Big[1-e^{-\big(\frac{1-\alpha}{\alpha}\big)t}\Big]\Big) I_{0,t}^{\alpha}z(t)y(t)- I_{0,t}^{\alpha}z(t)\ I_{0,t}^{\alpha}y(t) \\ && +\Big(\frac{1}{1-\alpha}\Big[1-e^{-\big(\frac{1-\alpha}{\alpha}\big)t}\Big]\Big) I_{0,t}^{\alpha}w(t)y(t)- I_{0,t}^{\alpha}w(t)\ I_{0,t}^{\alpha}y(t) \\ && + I_{0,t}^{\alpha}z(t)\ I_{0,t}^{\alpha}w(t)+\Big(\frac{1}{1-\alpha}\Big[1-e^{-\big(\frac{1-\alpha}{\alpha}\big)t}\Big]\Big) I_{0,t}^{\alpha}z(t)w(t). \end{eqnarray*}

    In this section, Grüss-type fractional integral inequalities are presented via Saigo fractional integer operator.

    Definition 13.1. [38] Assume that \alpha > 0, \beta, \eta\in \mathbb{R}. The Saigo fractional integral I_{0, x}^{\alpha, \beta, \eta}[\Omega(x)] of order \alpha for a real-valued continuous function \Omega is defined by

    \begin{align} I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[\Omega(x)] = \frac{x^{-\alpha-\beta}}{\Gamma(\alpha)}\int_0^x(x-t)^{\alpha-1}\; {}_{2}F_1\Big(\alpha+\beta, -\eta; \alpha; 1-\frac{t}{x}\Big)\Omega(t) dt,\end{align}

    where {}_{2}F_1 is the Gaussian hypergeometric function defined by

    {}_{2}F_1(a,b;c;x) = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(a)_n(b)_nx^n}{(c)_n n!},

    and (a)_n is the Pochhammer symbol

    (a)_0 = 1, \; (a)_n = a(a+1)\cdots(a+n-1) = \frac{\Gamma(a+n)}{\Gamma(a)}.

    Theorem 13.1. [39] Assume that \Omega, \Pi:[0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable functions satisfying (H_1) and (H_2). Then for all x > 0, \alpha > \max\{0, -\beta\}, \beta < 1, \beta-1 < \eta < 0, one has

    \begin{eqnarray*} &&\Big|\frac{\Gamma(1-\beta+\eta)}{\Gamma(1-\beta)\Gamma(1+\alpha+\eta)x^{\beta}}I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[\Omega(x)\Pi(x)]-I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[\Omega(x)]I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[\Pi(x)]\Big|\\ &\le&\sqrt{T(\Omega, Q_1(x),Q_2(x))T(\Pi, R_1(x), R_2(x))}, \end{eqnarray*}

    where

    \begin{eqnarray*} T(a,b,c)& = &(I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[c(x)]-I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[a(x)])(I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[a(x)]-I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[b(x)])\\ &&+\frac{\Gamma(1-\beta+\eta)}{\Gamma(1-\beta)\Gamma(1+\alpha+\eta)x^{\beta}}I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[b(x)a(x)]-I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[b(x)]I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[a(x)]\\ &&+\frac{\Gamma(1-\beta+\eta)}{\Gamma(1-\beta)\Gamma(1+\alpha+\eta)x^{\beta}}I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[c(x)a(x)]-I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[c(x)]I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[a(x)]\\ &&+ I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[b(x)]I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[c(x)]+\frac{\Gamma(1-\beta+\eta)}{\Gamma(1-\beta)\Gamma(1+\alpha+\eta)x^{\beta}}I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[b(x)c(x)]. \end{eqnarray*}

    Theorem 13.2. [39] Suppose that \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable functions satisfying (H_1) and (H_2). Then for all x > 0, \alpha > \max\{0, -\beta\}, \psi > \max\{0-\phi\}, \beta < 1, \beta-1 < \eta < 0, \phi < 1, \phi-1 < \zeta < 0, we have:

    \begin{eqnarray*} (a)\; \; &&I_{0,x}^{\psi,\phi,\zeta}[Q_1(x)]I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[\Omega(x)]+I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[Q_2(x)]I_{0,x}^{\psi,\phi,\zeta}[\Omega(x)]\\ &\ge&I_{0,x}^{\psi,\phi,\zeta}[Q_2(x)]I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[Q_1(x)]+I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[\Omega(x)]I_{0,x}^{\psi,\phi,\zeta}[\Omega(x)].\\[0.3cm] (b)\; \; &&I_{0,x}^{\psi,\phi,\zeta}[ R_1(x)]I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[\Omega(x)]+I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[Q_2(x)]I_{0,x}^{\psi,\phi,\zeta}[\Pi(x)]\\ &\ge&I_{0,x}^{\psi,\phi,\zeta}[ R_1(x)]I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[Q_2(x)]+I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[\Omega(x)]I_{0,x}^{\psi,\phi,\zeta}[\Pi(x)].\\[0.3cm] (c)\; \; &&I_{0,x}^{\psi,\phi,\zeta}[Q_1(x)]I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[\Pi(x)]+I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[ R_2(x)]I_{0,x}^{\psi,\phi,\zeta}[\Omega(x)]\\ &\ge&I_{0,x}^{\psi,\phi,\zeta}[Q_1(x)]I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[ R_2(x)]+I_{0,x}^{\psi,\phi,\zeta}[u\Omega(x)]I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[\Pi(x)].\\[0.3cm] (d)\; \; &&I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[Q_2(x)]I_{0,x}^{\psi,\phi,\zeta}[ R_2(x)]+I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[\Omega(x)]I_{0,x}^{\psi,\phi,\zeta}[\Pi(x)]\\ &\ge&I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[Q_2(x)]I_{0,x}^{\psi,\phi,\zeta}[\Pi(x)]+I_{0,x}^{\psi,\phi,\zeta}[ R_2(x)]I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[\Omega(x)].\\[0.3cm] (e)\; \; &&I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[Q_1(x)]I_{0,x}^{\psi,\phi,\zeta}[ R_1(x)]+I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[\Omega(x)]I_{0,x}^{\psi,\phi,\zeta}[\Pi(x)]\\ &\ge&I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[Q_1(x)]I_{0,x}^{\psi,\phi,\zeta}[\Pi(x)]+I_{0,x}^{\psi,\phi,\zeta}[ R_1(x)]I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}[\Omega(x)]. \end{eqnarray*}

    We define a fractional integral K^{\alpha, \beta, \eta} associated with the Gauss hypergeometric function as follows:

    Definition 13.2. [40] Let \Omega\in C_{\mu}. For \alpha > \max\{0, -(\eta+1)\}, \eta-\beta > -1, \beta < 1, we define a fractional integral K^{\alpha, \beta, \eta}f as follows:

    K^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}\Omega(t) = \frac{\Gamma(1-\beta)\Gamma(\alpha+\eta+1)}{\Gamma(\eta-\beta+1)}t^{\beta}I_{0+}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}\Omega(t) ,

    where I_{0+}^{\alpha, \beta, \eta}f is the right-hand sided Gauss hypergeometric fractional integral of order \alpha defined in Definition 13.1.

    We present integral inequalities of Grüss type for the above defined hypergeometric fractional integral.

    Theorem 13.3. [40] Let \Omega, \Pi\in C_{\mu} satisfying the condition (H) on [0, \infty). Then for all t > 0, \alpha > \max\{0, -(\eta+1)\}, \eta-\beta > -1, \beta < 1, we have

    |K^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}\Omega(t) \Pi(t)-K^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}\Omega(t) K^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}\Pi(t)|\le \frac{1}{4}(\mathfrak{M}-\mathfrak{m})(\mathfrak{P}-\mathfrak{p}).

    Theorem 13.4. [40] Let \Omega and \Pi be two synchronous functions on [0, \infty). Then the following inequality holds:

    K^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}\Omega(t) \Pi(t)\ge K^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}\Omega(t) K^{\alpha,\beta,\eta}\Pi(t).

    Another fractional integral operator K^{\alpha, \beta, \eta, \delta} associated with the Gauss hypergeometric function is defined as follows.

    Definition 13.3. [41] Let \Omega\in C_{\mu}. For \alpha > \max\{0, -(\delta+\eta+1)\}, \eta-\beta > -1, \beta < 1, \delta > -1 we define a fractional integral K^{\alpha, \beta, \eta, \delta}\Omega as follows:

    K^{\alpha,\beta,\eta,\delta}\Omega(t) = \frac{\Gamma(1-\beta)\Gamma(\alpha+\delta+\eta+1)}{\Gamma(\eta-\beta+1)\Gamma(\delta+1)}t^{\beta+\beta}I_{0+}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta, \delta}\Omega(t) ,

    where I_{0+}^{\alpha, \beta, \eta, \delta}\Omega is the right-hand sided Gauss hypergeometric fractional integral of order \alpha defined by

    \begin{align} I_{0,x}^{\alpha,\beta,\eta, \delta}[\Omega(x)] = \frac{x^{-\alpha-\beta-2\delta}}{\Gamma(\alpha)}\int_0^x t^{\delta}(x-t)^{\alpha-1}\; {}_{2}F_1\Big(\alpha+\beta+\delta, -\eta; \alpha; 1-\frac{t}{x}\Big)\Omega(t) dt,\end{align}

    and {}_{2}F_1 is the Gaussian hypergeometric function defined in Definition 13.1.

    We establish two Grüss-type fractional integral inequalities involving the Gauss hypergeometric function.

    Theorem 13.5. [41] Assume that \Omega, \Pi: [x_1, x_2]\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable functions satisfying the condition (H) on [0, \infty). Then, for all x\in [0, \infty), \alpha > 0, \delta > -1, and \beta, \eta\in \mathbb{R} with \alpha+\beta+\delta\ge 0 and \eta\le 0, we have:

    |K^{\alpha,\beta,\eta;\delta}\Omega(t) \Pi(t)-K^{\alpha,\beta,\eta,\delta}\Omega(t) K^{\alpha,\beta,\eta,\delta}\Pi(t)|\le \frac{1}{4}(\mathfrak{M}-\mathfrak{m})(\mathfrak{P}-\mathfrak{p}).

    Theorem 13.6. [41] Suppose that \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two synchronous functions (i.e (\Omega(t) -\Omega(s))(\Pi(t)-\Pi(s))\ge 0, \; t, s\in [0, \infty) ). Then, for all x\in [0, \infty), \alpha > 0, \delta > -1, and \beta, \eta\in \mathbb{R} with \alpha+\beta+\delta\ge 0 and \eta\le 0, we have:

    K^{\alpha,\beta,\eta,\delta}\Omega(t) \Pi(t)\ge K^{\alpha,\beta,\eta,\delta}\Omega(t) K^{\alpha,\beta,\eta,\delta}\Pi(t).

    Now we give some Grüss-type inequalities for generalized hypergeometric function fractional order integral operators. We start with the following definitions.

    Definition 13.4. [42] Let \alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma\in \mathbb{R} and \gamma > 0. Then the Saigo and Maeda fractional integral operator I_{t}^{\alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma}[\Omega(x)] of order \alpha for a real-valued continuous function \Omega is defined by

    \begin{align} I_{t}^{\alpha,\alpha',\beta,\beta',\gamma}[\Omega(x)] = \frac{x^{-\alpha}}{\Gamma(\gamma)}\int_0^x(x-t)^{\gamma-1}t^{-\alpha'}\; F_3\Big(\alpha, \alpha', \beta,\beta', \gamma, 1-\frac{t}{x}, 1-\frac{x}{t}\Big)\Omega(t) dt,\end{align}

    where F_3 is the Appell hypergeometric function defined by

    F_3(\alpha, \alpha', \beta,\beta', \gamma, x,y) = \sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac{(\alpha)_n(\alpha')_n(\beta)_n(\beta')_n x^my^n}{(\gamma)_{m+n}m! n!}, \; \; \max\{|x|,|y|\} < 1,

    and (a)_n is the Pochhammer symbol.

    Definition 13.5. [43] Assume that \alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma\in \mathbb{R} such that

    \gamma > \max\{0, \alpha+\alpha'+\beta-1, \alpha+\alpha'-1,\alpha'+\beta-1\}\; \; and\; \; \beta' > \max\{-1,\alpha'-1\}.

    Then we define a fractional integral operator

    (S_t^{\alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma}\Omega)(x) = \frac{\Gamma(1+\gamma-\alpha-\alpha')\Gamma(1+\gamma-\alpha'-\beta)\Gamma(1+\beta')}{\Gamma(1+\gamma-\alpha-\alpha'-\beta)\Gamma(1+\beta'-\alpha')}x^{\alpha+\alpha'-\gamma}(I_t^{\alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma}\Omega)(x),

    where I_t^{\alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma} is the Saigo-Maeda fractional integral of order \gamma.

    The main results for Grüss inequalities are given now.

    Theorem 13.7. [43] Assume that h: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} is an integrable function satisfying the condition m_1\le h(x)\le M_1 for all x\in [0, \infty). Then for \alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma\in \mathbb{R} we have:

    \begin{eqnarray*} && \Big|(S^{\alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma}_t h^2)(x)-\Big((S_t^{\alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma}h)(x)\Big)^2\\ & = &\Big(M_1-(S^{\alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma}_t h)(x)\Big)\Big((S^{\alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma}_t h)(x)-m\Big)(M_1-h)(h-m_1)(x), \end{eqnarray*}

    provided \alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma > 0.

    Theorem 13.8. [43] Assume that (H) holds on [0, \infty). In addition, let \Omega, \Pi\in C_{\mu}. Then for \alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma\in \mathbb{R} and \alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma > 0 we have:

    \begin{eqnarray*} \Big|(S^{\alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma}\Omega(x)\Pi(x)-(S^{\alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma}\Omega)(x)(S^{\alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma}\Pi)(x)\Big|\le \frac{1}{4} (\mathfrak{M}-\mathfrak{m})(\mathfrak{P}-\mathfrak{p}), \; \forall x\in [0,\infty). \end{eqnarray*}

    Theorem 13.9. [43] Let \Omega and \Pi be two synchronous functions on [0, \infty) and let v, w: [0, \infty) \to [0, \infty). Then for all t > 0,

    \begin{eqnarray*} && \Big(S^{\alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma}_t v\Omega\Pi\Big)(x)\Big(S^{\alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma}_t w\Big)(x)+\Big(S^{\alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma}_t w\Omega\Pi\Big)(x) \Big(S^{\alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma}_t v\Big)(x)\\ &\ge&\Big(S^{\alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma}_t w\Pi\Big)(x)\Big(S^{\alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma}_t v\Omega\Big)(x)+\Big(S^{\alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma}_t w\Omega\Big)(x) \Big(S^{\alpha, \alpha', \beta, \beta', \gamma}_t v\Pi\Big)(x). \end{eqnarray*}

    In this section we present Grüss-type integral inequalities via quantum calculus.

    Definition 14.1. [44] The Jakson's q -derivarive and q -integral of a function \Omega defined on J are, respectively, given by

    D_q\Omega(t) = \frac{\Omega(t) -\Omega(tq)}{t(1-q)}, \; \; \; t\ne 0, \; \; q\ne 1,
    \begin{align} \int_0^t\Omega(s)d_qs = t(1-q)\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{\infty}q^k \Omega(tq^k). \end{align}

    Definition 14.2. [45] The Riemann-Liouville fractional q -integral operator of a function \Omega of order \alpha is given by

    \begin{align} I_q^{\alpha}\Omega(t) = \frac{t^{\alpha-1}}{\Gamma_q(\alpha)}\int_0^t\Big(\frac{qs}{t}, q\Big)_{\alpha-1}\Omega(s)d_qs, \; \; \alpha > 0, \; \; 0 < q < 1,\end{align}

    where

    (a,q)_{\alpha} = \frac{(a;q)_{\infty}}{(aq^{\alpha};q)_{\infty}}, \; \; \alpha\in \mathbb{R}

    and

    (\alpha, q)_{\infty} = \prod\limits_{j = 0}^{\infty}(1-\alpha q^j).

    Now, we present some q -Grüss integral inequalities.

    Theorem 14.1. [46] Assume that \Omega, \Pi: [0, \infty)\to \mathbb{R} are two integrable functions satisfyingt (H_1) and (H_2). Then, for t > 0 and \alpha > 0, we have:

    \Big|\frac{t^{\alpha}}{\Gamma_q(\alpha+1)}I_q^{\alpha}\Omega(t) \Pi(t)- I_q^{\alpha}\Omega(t) I_q^{\alpha} \Pi(t)\Big|\le \sqrt{T_q(\Omega,Q_1.Q_2)T_q(\Pi, R_1, R_2)},

    where

    \begin{eqnarray*} T_q(u,v,w)& = &(I_q^{\alpha}w(t)-I_q^{\alpha}u(t))(I_q^{\alpha}u(t)-I_q^{\alpha}v(t))+\frac{t^{\alpha}}{\Gamma_q(\alpha+1)}I_q^{\alpha}v(t)u(t)-I_q^{\alpha}v(t)I_q^{\alpha}u(t)\\ &&+I_q^{\alpha}v(t)I_q^{\alpha}w(t)-\frac{t^{\alpha}}{\Gamma_q(\alpha+1)}I_q^{\alpha}v(t)w(t). \end{eqnarray*}

    Definition 14.3. [47] Assume \Omega:J\rightarrow \mathbb{R} is a continuous function and let x\in J . Then the expression

    \begin{equation*} \label{A2.1} _{x_1}D_{q}\Omega(x) = \frac{\Omega(x)-\Omega(qx+(1-q)x_1)}{(1-q)(x-x_1)}, \,\, t\ne x_1 , \quad _{x_1}D_{q}\Omega(x_1) = \lim\limits_{x\to x_1} {_{x_1}D_{q}}\Omega(x), \end{equation*}

    is called the q -derivative on J of function \Omega at x .

    Definition 14.4. [47] Assume \Omega:J\rightarrow \mathbb{R} is a continuous function. Then the q -integral on J is defined by

    \begin{align} \label{A2.4} \int_{x_1}^x\Omega(t) {_{x_1}d_{q}}t = (1-q)(x-x_1)\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}q^n\Omega(q^nx+(1-q^n)x_1) \end{align}

    for x\in J . Moreover, if c\in(a, x) then the definite q -integral on J is defined by

    \begin{eqnarray*} \int_{c}^x\Omega(t) {_{x_1}d_{q}}t& = &\int_{x_1}^x\Omega(t) {_{x_1}d_{q}}t-\int_{x_1}^c\Omega(t) {_{x_1}d_{q}t}\\ & = &(1-q)(x-x_1)\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}q^n\Omega(q^nx+(1-q^n)x_1)\\ &&-(1-q)(c-x_1)\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}q^n\Omega(q^nc+(1-q^n)x_1). \end{eqnarray*}

    Theorem 14.2. [47] Assume \Omega, \Pi:J \rightarrow \mathbb{R} are continuous functions on J satisfying the vondition (H). Then we have the inequality

    \begin{eqnarray*} &&\left|\frac{1}{x_2-x_1}\int_{x_1}^{x_2}\Omega(x)\Pi(x){_{x_1}d_q}x-\left(\frac{1}{x_2-x_1}\int_{x_1}^{x_2}\Omega(x){_{x_1}d_q}x\right)\left(\frac{1}{x_2-x_1}\int_{x_1}^{x_2}\Pi(x){_{x_1}d_q}x\right)\right|\nonumber\\ &&\; \leq\frac{1}{4}(\mathfrak{M}-\mathfrak{m})(\mathfrak{P}-\mathfrak{p}). \end{eqnarray*}

    Now, we are going to present the q -Grüss- \check{C} eby \check{s} ev integral inequality on interval [x_1, x_2] .

    Theorem 14.3. [47] Let \Omega, \Pi:J \rightarrow \mathbb{R} be L_1 , L_2 -Lipschitzian continuous functions on [x_1, x_2] , so that

    \begin{eqnarray*} |\Omega(u)-\Omega(v)|\leq L_1|u-v|, \qquad |\Pi(u)-\Pi(v)|\leq L_2|u-v|, \end{eqnarray*}

    for all u, v\in[x_1, x_2] . Then we have:

    \begin{eqnarray*} &&\left|\frac{1}{x_2-x_1}\int_{x_1}^{x_2}\Omega(x)\Pi(x){_{x_1}d_q}x-\left(\frac{1}{x_2-x_1}\int_{x_1}^{x_2}\Omega(x){_{x_1}d_q}x\right)\left(\frac{1}{x_2-x_1}\int_{x_1}^{x_2}\Pi(x){_{x_1}d_q}x\right)\right|\nonumber\\ & \leq& \frac{qL_1L_2}{(1+q+q^2)(1+q)^2}(x_2-x_1)^2. \end{eqnarray*}

    Let q\in (0, 1) and let I be any interval of \mathbb{R} containing 0, and denote by I_q the set

    I_q = qI = \{qX: X\in I\}; \; \; I_q\subseteq I.

    Definition 14.5. [44] Let \Omega:I\to \mathbb{R}. The q -symmetric difference operator of \Omega is defined by

    (\tilde{D}_q\Omega)(t) = \frac{\Omega(qt)-\Omega(q^{-1}t)}{(q-q^{-1})t}; \; \; t\in I_q\setminus\{0\},

    and

    (\tilde{D}_q\Omega)(t) = \Omega'(0), \; t = 0.

    Definition 14.6. [44] Suppose that x_1, x_2\in I and x_1 < x_2. For \Omega: I\to \mathbb{R} and for q\in (0, 1), the q -symmetric integral of \Omega is given by

    \begin{align} \int_{x_1}^{x_2} \Omega(t) \tilde{d}_qt = \int_0^{x_2}\Omega(t) \tilde{d}_qt-\int_0^{x_1}\Omega(t) \tilde{d}_qt, \end{align}

    where

    \begin{align} \int_0^x\Omega(t) \tilde{d}_qt = x(1-q^2)\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}q^{2n}\Omega(q^{2n+1}x), \; \; x\in I, \end{align}

    provided that the series converges at x = x_1 and x = x_2.

    Now, the concepts of q -symmetric derivative and q -symmetric integral are extended on finite intervals. We fix s\in \mathbb{N}\cup \{0\}. Let J_s = [t_s, t_{s+1}]\subset \mathbb{R} be an interval containing 0 and 0 < q_s < 1 be a constant. For a function \Omega: I_s\to \mathbb{R}, we define the q_s -symmetric derivative at a point t\in I_s as follows:

    Definition 14.7. [48] Assume that \Omega: I_s\to \mathbb{R} is continuous and t\in I_s. The q_s -symmetric derivative of \Omega at t is defined as

    (D_{q_s}\Omega)(t) = \frac{\Omega(q_s^{-1}t+(1-q_s^{-1})t_s)-\Omega(q_s t+(1-q_s)t_s)}{(q_s^{-1}-q_s)(t-t_s)}; \; \; t\ne t_s,
    (D_{q_s}\Omega)(t_s)\lim\limits_{t\to t_s}(D_{q_s}\Omega)(t).

    Definition 14.8. [48] Assume that \Omega: I_s\to \mathbb{R} is a continuous function. The q_s -symmetric integral is defined as

    \begin{align} \int_{t_s}^t\Omega(s)d_{q_s}t = (t-t_s)(1-q_s^2)\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{\infty}q_s^{2n}\Omega(q_s^{2n+1} t+(1-q_s^{2n+1})t_s). \end{align}

    Now, we present q_s -symmetric analogue of Grüss-Chebyshev integral inequality.

    Theorem 14.4. [48] Let \Omega and \Pi:J = [x_1, x_2]\to \mathbb{R} be L_1, L_2 -Lipschitzian continuous functions on [x_1, x_2] so that

    |\Omega(u)-\Omega(v)|\le L_1|u-v|, \; \; \; |\Pi(u)-\Pi(v)|\le L_2|u-v|,

    for all u, v\in [x_1, x_2]. Then:

    \begin{eqnarray*} &&\Big|\frac{1}{x_2-x_1}\int_{x_1}^{x_2} \Omega(x)\Pi(x)d_{q_s}x-\Big(\frac{1}{x_2-x_1}\int_{x_1}^{x_2} \Omega(x)d_{q_s}x\Big)\Big(\frac{1}{x_2-x_1}\int_{x_1}^{x_2} \Pi(x)d_{q_s}x\Big)\Big|\\ &\le&\frac{L_1L_2q_s^4(x_2-x_1)^2}{(1+q_s^2+q_s^4)(1+q_s^2)^2}. \end{eqnarray*}

    The following concepts are adapted by Ref. ([49]). We state a q -shifting operator as

    {}_{x_1}\Phi_q(m) = qm+(1-q)x_1, \; \; \; 0 < q < 1, \; \; m,x_1\in \mathbb{R}.

    The q -analog is stated by

    (m;q)_0 = 1, \; \; \; \; (m;q)_k = \prod\limits_{i = 1}^{k-1}(1-q^im), \; \; k\in \mathbb{N}\cup\{\infty\}.

    The q number is stated by

    [m]_q = \frac{1-q^m}{1-q}, \; \; m\in \mathbb{R}.

    The q -Gamma function is stated by

    \Gamma_q(t) = \frac{{}_{0}(1-{}_{0}\Phi_q(1))_q^{(t-1)}}{(1-q)^{t-1)}}, \; \; t\in \mathbb{R}\setminus\{0,-1,-2,\ldots\}.

    Here, we add some definitions regarding fractional q -calculus, namely the Riemann-Liouville fractional q -integral.

    Definition 14.9. [49] Let \alpha\ge 0 and function \Omega be a continuous stated on [x_1, x_2]. Then (_{x_1}I^{0}_q\Omega)(t) = \Omega (t) is given by

    \begin{eqnarray*} (_{x_1}I^{\alpha}_q \Omega)(t)& = &\frac{1}{\Gamma_q(\alpha)}\int_{x_1}^t{}_{x_1}(t-{}_{x_1}\Phi_q(s))^{\alpha-1}_{q}\Omega(s)\; _{x_1}d_qs\\ & = &\frac{(1-q)(t-x_1)}{\Gamma_q(\alpha)}\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{\infty}q^i\; {}_{x_1}(t-{}_{x_1}\Phi_q^{i+1}(t))^{\alpha-1}_{q}\Omega({}_{x_1}\Phi^{i}_{q}(t)). \end{eqnarray*}

    Now, we present the fractional q -Grüss integral inequality on the interval [x_1, x_2].

    Theorem 14.5. [50] Let \Omega, \Pi: [x_1, x_2]\to \mathbb{R} be continuous functions satisfying (H). For 0 < q < 1 and \alpha > 0, we have the inequality

    \begin{eqnarray*} &&\Big|\frac{\Gamma_q(\alpha+1)}{(x_2-x_1)^{\alpha}}({}_{x_1}I_q^{\alpha}\Omega(s)\Pi(s))(b)-\Big(\frac{\Gamma_q(\alpha+1)}{(x_2-x_1)^{\alpha}}({}_{x_1}I_q^{\alpha}\Omega(s))(b)\Big)\Big(\frac{\Gamma_q(\alpha+1)}{(x_2-x_1)^{\alpha}}({}_{x_1}I_q^{\alpha}\Pi(s))(b)\Big)\Big|\\ &\le&\frac{1}{4}(\mathfrak{M}-\mathfrak{m})(\mathfrak{P}-\mathfrak{p}). \end{eqnarray*}

    Next, we give the fractional q -Grüss-Čebyšev integral inequality on the interval [x_1, x_2].

    Theorem 14.6. [50] Let \Omega, \Pi: [x_1, x_2]\to \mathbb{R} be L_1 -, L_2 -Lipschitzian continuous functions, so that

    |\Omega(u)-\Omega(v)|\le L_1 |u-v|, \; \; \; \; \; |\Pi(u)-\Pi(v)|\le L_2 |u-v|,

    for all u, v\in [x_1, x_2], 0 < q < 1, L_1, L_2 > 0, and \alpha > 0. Then we have the inequality

    \begin{eqnarray*} &&\Big|\frac{(x_2-x_1)^{\alpha}}{\Gamma_q(\alpha+1)}({}_{x_1}I_q^{\alpha}\Omega(s)\Pi(s))(x_2)-({}_{x_1}I_q^{\alpha}\Omega(s))(x_2)({}_{x_1}I_q^{\alpha}\Pi(s))(x_2)\Big|\\ &\le&\frac{L_1L_2(x_2-x_1)^{2\alpha+2}}{\Gamma_q(\alpha+2)\Gamma_q(\alpha+3)}\Big((1+q)[\alpha+1]_q-[\alpha+2]_q\Big). \end{eqnarray*}

    In this section we give Grüss-type integral inequalities via fractional Hilfer derivative operators.

    In this section we present several integral inequalities for the k -Hilfer fractional derivative operator.

    Definition 15.1. [51] Let \Omega\in L^1[x_1, x_2], \Omega\star K_{(1-\eta)(\eta-\xi)}\in AC^n[x_1, x_2], n-1 < \xi < n, 0 < \eta\le 1, n\in \mathbb{N}. Then the following

    ({}^{k}D^{\xi,\eta}_{x_1+}\Omega)(x) = I^{\eta(n-\xi)}_{x_1+,k}\frac{d^n}{dx^n}(I^{(1-\eta)(n-\xi)}_{x_1+,k} \Omega(x)),

    is called the Hiler k -fractional derivative.

    Theorem 15.1. [51] Let k > 0 and (D^{\xi+\eta(n-\xi)}_{x_1+, k}\Pi) be a positive function on [0, \infty), and let ({}^{k}D^{\xi, \eta}_{x_1+}\Omega) denote the Hilfer k -fractional derivative of order \xi, 0 < \xi < 1, and type 0 < \eta\le 1. Suppose that:

    There exist (D^{\xi+\eta(n-\xi)}_{x_1+, k} R_1), (D^{\xi+\eta(n-\xi)}_{x_1+, k} R_2) such that

    (D^{\xi+\eta(n-\xi)}_{x_1+,k} R_1)(\xi)\le (D^{\xi+\eta(n-\xi)}_{x_1+,k}\Pi)(\xi)\le (D^{\xi+\eta(n-\xi)}_{x_1+,k} R_2)(\xi),

    for all \xi\in [0, \infty).

    Then

    \begin{eqnarray*} &&({}^{k}D^{\xi,\eta}_{x_1+} R_1)(\xi)({}^{k}D^{\xi,\eta}_{x_1+}\Pi)(\xi)+({}^{k}D^{\xi,\eta}_{x_1+} R_2)(\xi)({}^{k}D^{\xi,\eta}_{x_1+}\Pi)(\xi)\\ &\ge&({}^{k}D^{\xi,\eta}_{x_1+} R_1)(\xi)({}^{k}D^{\xi,\eta}_{x_1+} R_2)(\xi)+({}^{k}D^{\xi,\eta}_{x_1+}\Pi)(\xi)({}^{k}D^{\xi,\eta}_{x_1+}\Pi)(\xi). \end{eqnarray*}

    In this section, we present inequalities of the Grüss-type via k -fractional Hilfer-Katugampola generalized derivative.

    Definition 15.2. [52] Let n-1 < \alpha\le n, 0\le \beta\le 1, n\in \mathbb{N}, \rho > 0, k > 0 and \Omega\in M_q[x_1, x_2] = \Big\{\Omega: \|\Omega_q\| = \Big(\int_{x_1}^{x_2}|\Omega(t) |^qdt\Big)^{1/q} < \infty\Big\}, 1 < q < \infty. The generalized k -fractional Hilfer-Katugampola derivatives (left-sided and right-sided) are defined as

    \begin{align} \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Omega(t) = \frac{\rho^{1-\frac{\gamma-\alpha}{k}}}{k\Gamma_k(\gamma-\alpha)}\int_{x_1}^t(t^{\rho}-y^{\rho})^{\frac{\gamma-\alpha}{k}-1}y^{\rho-1}\Omega^{(\gamma)}(y)dy,\; \; t > x_1, \end{align}
    \begin{align} \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_2,k}\Omega(t) = \frac{\rho^{1-\frac{\gamma-\alpha}{k}}}{k\Gamma_k(\gamma-\alpha)}\int_t^{x_2}(y^{\rho}-t^{\rho})^{\frac{\gamma-\alpha}{k}-1}y^{\rho-1}\Omega^{(\gamma)}(y)dy,\; \; t < x_2, \end{align}

    where \gamma = \alpha+\beta(kn-\alpha), \alpha > 0.

    Theorem 15.2. [52] Let \rho, \delta, \alpha, \gamma, k, a > 0 and \Omega\in M_q[x_1, x_2] be positive integrable function on [x_1, x_2] satisfying (H_1). Then we have:

    \begin{eqnarray*} &&\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Omega(t) \; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}Q_2(t)+\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}Q_1(t)\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Omega(t) \\ &\ge& \mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}Q_1(t)\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}Q_2(t)+\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Omega(t) \; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Omega(t) . \end{eqnarray*}

    Theorem 15.3. [52] Let \rho, \delta, \alpha, \gamma, k, a > 0 and \Omega, \Pi\in M_q[x_1, x_2] be positive integrable functions on [x_1, x_2] satisfying (H_1) and (H_2). Then we have:

    \begin{eqnarray*} (a)\; \; \; &&\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k} R_1(t)\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Omega(t) +\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Pi(t)\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}Q_2(t)\\ &\ge&\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k} R_1(t)\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}Q_2(t)+\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Pi(t)\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Omega(t) .\\[0.3cm] (b)\; \; \; &&\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}Q_1(t)\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Pi(t)+\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Omega(t) \; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k} R_2(t)\\ &\ge&\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}Q_1(t)\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k} R_2(t)+\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Pi(t)\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Omega(t) .\\[0.3cm] (c)\; \; \; &&\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k} R_2(t)\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}Q_2(t)+\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Pi(t)\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Omega(t) \\ &\ge&\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Pi(t)\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}Q_2(t)+\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k} R_2(t)\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Omega(t) .\\[0.3cm] (d)\; \; \; &&\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k} R_1(t)\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}Q_1(t)+\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Pi(t)\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Omega(t) \\ &\ge&\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Pi(t)\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}Q_1(t)+\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k} R_1(t)\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Omega(t) . \end{eqnarray*}

    Theorem 15.4. [52] Let \rho, \delta, \alpha, \gamma, k, a > 0 and \Omega, \Pi\in M_q[x_1, x_2] be positive integrable functions on [x_1, x_2] satisfying (H_1) and (H_2). If p, q > 1 and \frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q} = 1, then we have:

    \begin{eqnarray*} (a)\; \; \; &&\frac{1}{p}\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}(\Pi(t))^p\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}(\Omega(t) )^p+\frac{1}{q}\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}(\Omega(t) )^q\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}(\Pi(t))^q\\ &\ge&\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Omega(t) \Pi(t)\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Omega(t) \Pi(t).\\[0.3cm] (b)\; \; \; &&\frac{1}{p}\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}(\Pi(t))^p\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}(\Omega(t) )^p+\frac{1}{q}\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}(\Omega(t) )^q\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}(\Pi(t))^q\\ &\ge&\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Omega^{p-1}(t)\Pi^{q-1}(t)\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k} \Omega(t) \Pi(t).\\[0.3cm] (c)\; \; \; &&\frac{1}{p}\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}(\Pi(t))^p\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}(\Omega(t) )^2+\frac{1}{q}\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}(\Omega(t) )^q\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}(\Pi(t))^2\\ &\ge&\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Omega^{2/p}(t)\Pi^{2/q}(t)\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Omega(t) \Pi(t).\\[0.3cm] (d)\; \; \; &&\frac{1}{p}\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}(\Pi(t))^q\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}(\Omega(t) )^2+\frac{1}{q}\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}(\Omega(t) )^p\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}(\Pi(t))^2\\ &\ge&\mathcal{D}^{\delta, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Omega^{p-1}(t)\Pi^{q-1}(t)\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}\Omega^{2/p}(t)\Pi^{2/q}(t). \end{eqnarray*}

    Theorem 15.5. [52] Let \rho, \delta, \alpha, \gamma, k, a > 0 and \Omega, \Pi\in M_q[x_1, x_2] be positive integrable functions on [x_1, x_2]. Let

    \mu = \min\limits_{0\le y\le t}\frac{\Omega(y)}{\Pi(y)}, \; \; \; \mathcal{M} = \max\limits_{0\le y\le t}\frac{\Omega(y)}{\Pi(y)}.

    Then we have:

    \begin{eqnarray*} &&(i)\; \; \frac{(\mu+\mathcal{M})^2}{4\mu\mathcal{M}}\mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}[\Omega(t) \Pi(t)]^2\ge \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}[\Pi(t)]^2\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}[\Omega(t) ]^2.\\[0.3cm] &&(ii)\; \; \frac{\sqrt{\mu}-\sqrt{\mathcal{M}}}{2\sqrt{\mu\mathcal{M}}}\mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}[\Omega(t) \Pi(t)]\ge \sqrt{\mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}[\Pi(t)]^2\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}[\Omega(t) ]^2}-\mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}[\Omega(t) \Pi(t)]\ge 0.\\[0.3cm] &&(iii)\; \; \frac{\mu-\mathcal{M}}{4\mu\mathcal{M}} \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}[\Omega(t) \Pi(t)]^2\ge \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}[\Pi(t)]^2\; \mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}[\Omega(t) ]^2- [\mathcal{D}^{\alpha, \gamma, \rho}_{x_1,k}[\Omega(t) \Pi(t)]]^2\ge 0. \end{eqnarray*}

    Our objective in this paper was to present a comprehensive and up-to-date review on Grüss-type inequalities for fractional differential operators. We presented results including inequalities of the Grüss-type for different kinds of fractional integral and differential operators. Grüss-type inequalities for fractional integrals of Riemann-Liouville, Katugampola, Hadamard's, Raina's, tempered, conformable, proportional, Caputo-Fabrizio, Saigo's are included. Moreover Grüss-type inequalities concerning Hilfer fractional differential operators and quantum Grüss-type integral inequalities are also presented. We believe that the present survey will provide a platform for the researchers working on Grüss-type inequalities to learn about the available work on the topic before developing the new results. Future research regarding this review paper is fascinating. Our review paper might inspire a good number of additional studies.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project no. (IFKSUOR3-340-1).

    The authors declare that they do not have conflict of interest regarding this manuscript.



    [1] T. Takagi, M. Sugeno, Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control, IEEE T. Syst. Man Cybern., 15 (1985), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1985.6313399 doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1985.6313399
    [2] E. H. Mamdani, Application of fuzzy algorithms for control of simple dynamic plant, Proc. Inst. Electr. Eng., 121 (1974), 1585–1588. https://doi.org/10.1049/piee.1974.0328 doi: 10.1049/piee.1974.0328
    [3] J. Liouville, Mémoire sur quelques questions de géométrie et de mécanique, et sur un nouveau genre de calcul pour résoudre ces questions, J. l'Éc. Polytech., 13 (1832), 1–69.
    [4] M. Caputo, Linear model of dissipation whose Q is almost frequency independent. II, Geophys. J. Int., 13 (1967), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1967.tb02303.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1967.tb02303.x
    [5] M. Caputo, M. Fabrizio, A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel, Progr. Fract. Differ. Appl., 1 (2015), 73–85.
    [6] A. Atangana, D. Baleanu, New fractional derivatives with nonlocal and non-singular kernel: Theory and application to heat transfer model, Therm. Sci., 20 (2016), 763–769.
    [7] R. Jarrow, P. Protter, A short history of stochastic integration and mathematical finance: The early years, 1880–1970, A festschrift for Herman Rubin, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Lecture Notes-Monograph Series, 2004, 75–80.
    [8] J. L. Doob, Stochastic processes and statistics, PNAS, 20 (1934), 376–379. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.20.6.376 doi: 10.1073/pnas.20.6.376
    [9] A. Atangana, S. İǧret Araz, New concept in calculus: Piecewise differential and integral operators, Chaos Solitons Fract., 145 (2021), 110638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110638 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110638
    [10] J. Crank, P. Nicolson, A practical method for numerical evaluation of solutions of partial differential equations of the heat-conduction type, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 43 (1947), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100023197 doi: 10.1017/S0305004100023197
    [11] J. Unsworth, F. J. Duarte, Heat diffusion in a solid sphere and Fourier theory: An elementary practical example, Am. J. Phys., 47 (1979), 981. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.11601 doi: 10.1119/1.11601
    [12] A. Atangana, S. İǧret Araz, Modeling third waves of Covid-19 spread with piecewise differential and integral operators: Turkey, Spain and Czechia, Results Phys., 29 (2021), 104694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104694 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104694
    [13] A. Atangana, S. Jain, The role of power decay, exponential decay and Mittag-Leffler function's waiting time distribution: Application of cancer spread, Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl., 512 (2018), 330–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.08.033 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.08.033
    [14] S. Jain, Numerical analysis for the fractional diffusion and fractional Buckmaster equation by the two-step Laplace Adam-Bashforth method, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 133 (2018), 19. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2018-11854-x doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2018-11854-x
    [15] G. C. Wu, Z. G. Deng, D. Baleanu, D. Q. Zeng, New variable-order fractional chaotic systems for fast image encryption, Chaos, 29 (2019), 083103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5096645 doi: 10.1063/1.5096645
    [16] G. C. Wu, D. Q. Zeng, D. Baleanu, Fractional impulsive differential equations: Exact solutions, integral equations and short memory case, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 22 (2019), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1515/fca-2019-0012 doi: 10.1515/fca-2019-0012
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. HUI-YAN CHENG, IBRAHIM MEKAWY, JUAN WANG, HUMERA BATOOL, MUHAMMAD IMRAN QURESHI, ANALYSIS OF NEWTON AND HERMITE–HADAMARD-TYPE LOCAL FRACTIONAL INTEGRAL INEQUALITIES ON FRACTAL SETS USING GENERALIZED PRE-INVEXITY, 2025, 33, 0218-348X, 10.1142/S0218348X25401036
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2139) PDF downloads(75) Cited by(7)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(5)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog