Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article

A general result on the spectral radii of nonnegative k-uniform tensors

  • Received: 18 November 2019 Accepted: 09 February 2020 Published: 17 February 2020
  • MSC : 05C50, 05C65, 15A69

  • In this paper, we define k-uniform tensors for k2, which are more closely related to the k-uniform hypergraphs than the general tensors, and introduce the parameter r(q)i(A) for a tensor A, which is the generalization of the i-th slice sum ri(A) (also the i-th average 2-slice sum mi(A)). By using r(q)i(A) for q1, we obtain a general result on the sharp upper bound for the spectral radius of a nonnegative k-uniform tensor. When k=2,q=1,2,3, this result deduces the main results for nonnegative matrices in [1,8,27]; when k3,q=1, this result deduces the main results in [5,20]. We also find that the upper bounds obtained from different q can not be compared. Furthermore, we can obtain some known or new upper bounds by applying the general result to k-uniform hypergraphs and k-uniform directed hypergraphs, respectively.

    Citation: Chuang Lv, Lihua You, Yufei Huang. A general result on the spectral radii of nonnegative k-uniform tensors[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 1799-1819. doi: 10.3934/math.2020121

    Related Papers:

    [1] Muhammad Sajjad, Tariq Shah, Qin Xin, Bander Almutairi . Eisenstein field BCH codes construction and decoding. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 29453-29473. doi: 10.3934/math.20231508
    [2] Berna Arslan . On generalized biderivations of Banach algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 36259-36272. doi: 10.3934/math.20241720
    [3] Moin A. Ansari, Ali N. A. Koam, Azeem Haider . Intersection soft ideals and their quotients on KU-algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 12077-12084. doi: 10.3934/math.2021700
    [4] Shan Li, Kaijia Luo, Jiankui Li . Generalized Lie n-derivations on generalized matrix algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 29386-29403. doi: 10.3934/math.20241424
    [5] Jie Qiong Shi, Xiao Long Xin . Ideal theory on EQ-algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 11686-11707. doi: 10.3934/math.2021679
    [6] Shakir Ali, Ali Yahya Hummdi, Mohammed Ayedh, Naira Noor Rafiquee . Linear generalized derivations on Banach -algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 27497-27511. doi: 10.3934/math.20241335
    [7] Dan Liu, Jianhua Zhang, Mingliang Song . Local Lie derivations of generalized matrix algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(3): 6900-6912. doi: 10.3934/math.2023349
    [8] Wen Teng, Jiulin Jin, Yu Zhang . Cohomology of nonabelian embedding tensors on Hom-Lie algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 21176-21190. doi: 10.3934/math.20231079
    [9] Yingyu Luo, Yu Wang, Junjie Gu, Huihui Wang . Jordan matrix algebras defined by generators and relations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 3047-3055. doi: 10.3934/math.2022168
    [10] He Yuan, Zhuo Liu . Lie n-centralizers of generalized matrix algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(6): 14609-14622. doi: 10.3934/math.2023747
  • In this paper, we define k-uniform tensors for k2, which are more closely related to the k-uniform hypergraphs than the general tensors, and introduce the parameter r(q)i(A) for a tensor A, which is the generalization of the i-th slice sum ri(A) (also the i-th average 2-slice sum mi(A)). By using r(q)i(A) for q1, we obtain a general result on the sharp upper bound for the spectral radius of a nonnegative k-uniform tensor. When k=2,q=1,2,3, this result deduces the main results for nonnegative matrices in [1,8,27]; when k3,q=1, this result deduces the main results in [5,20]. We also find that the upper bounds obtained from different q can not be compared. Furthermore, we can obtain some known or new upper bounds by applying the general result to k-uniform hypergraphs and k-uniform directed hypergraphs, respectively.


    Some implicational logics have contributed to give rise to the notions of a few abstract algebras such as BCK-algebras and BCI-algebras, see [1] and [2]. The recent developments in the field of artificial intelligence has contributed greatly in many aspects of daily life. The basic tools of artificial intelligence which assist in decision making are logical systems. The fundamental axioms of the implicational calculus are the motivation behind the introduction and development of BCK-algebra and BCI-algebra, see [1] and [2]. Keeping in view the strong relationships between these algebras and corresponding logics, translation procedures have been developed to relate theorems and formulas of a logic and corresponding algebra. Hence, the study of abstract algebras, which have been motivated by logical systems, and their generalization has remained a topic of interest for those who are working in the areas of artificial intelligence, logical systems and algebraic structures. Consequently, another class of algebras known as the class of BCH-algebras has been introduced in [3,4]. It has been shown [5] that the class of BCK/BCI-algebras is a proper subclass of BCH-algebras. Several aspects of this algebra have been studied in [5,6,7,8,9]. Recently, Chaudhry et al. [10] introduced the notion of a gBCH-algebra. They showed that gBCH-algebra is a generalization of BCK/BCI/BCH-algebras. Consequently, this algebra carries some connections with the BCK/BCI positive logics and corresponding systems which are used in the process of decision making in the field of artificial intelligence. The study of gBCH-algebra is a desirable topic for researchers working in the relevant areas.

    In this paper we study the class of gBCH-algebras. We define the notions of a branchwise solid gBCH-algebra and a branchwise strongly solid gBCH-algebra. We also introduce the notions of branchwise commutative, branchwise implicative and branchwise positive implicative gBCH-algebras, and we investigate relations between these classes.

    Definition 1. A BCH-algebra [3,4] is a non-empty set X with a constant 0 and a binary operation "" satisfying the following axioms:

    (Ⅰ) xx=0,

    (Ⅱ) xy=0 and yx=0 imply x=y,

    (Ⅲ) (xy)z=(xz)y

    for all x,y,zX.

    From now onward, we denote xy by xy, x(yz) by x(yz). It is well known that the class of all BCK/BCI-algebras is a proper subclass of the class of all BCH-algebras, see [5].

    Definition 2. A generalized BCH-algebra (shortly, gBCH-algebra) [10] is a non-empty set X with a constant 0 and a binary operation "" satisfying the conditions (I), (II) and the following conditions:

    (Ⅳ) (x(xy))y=0,

    (Ⅴ) (xy)x=0y

    for all x,y in X.

    Note that the condition (V) is equivalent to (xy)x=(xx)y in gBCH-algebras. Every BCH-algebra is a gBCH-algebra, since the condition (III) implies that (x(xy))y=(xy)(xy)=0 and (xy)x=(xx)y=0y for all x,yX.

    A BCH-algebra (or gBCH-algebra) is said to be proper if it does not satisfy the condition:

    (Ⅵ) ((xy)(xz))(zy)=0

    for all x,y,zX.

    Example 1. [10] Let X:={0,w,x,y,z} be a set with the following table:

    0wxyz0000yyww00yyxxx0yzyyyy00zzyyw0

    Then it is easy to see that (X,,0) is a gBCH-algebra, but not a BCH-algebra, since (xy)z=0w=(xz)y.

    This research is a continuation of Chaudhry et al. [10], and so we refer several definitions and theorems discussed in [10]. Let (X,,0) be a gBCH-algebra. We define a binary relation "" on X by xy if and only if xy=0. An element x0 is said to be a minimal element of X if xx0 implies x=x0. We denote Min(X) the set of all minimal elements of X. The set Med(X) consists of all elements xX satisfying 0(0x)=x, and we call it a medial part of X. A set B(x0):={xX|x0x}, where x0Min(X), is called a branch of X. It is known that Min(X)=Med(X) in generalized BCH-algebras (see [10]).

    Proposition 1. [10] Let (X,,0) be a gBCH-algebra. Then

    (ⅰ) 0 is a minimal element of X,

    (ⅱ) x0=x for all xX.

    Theorem 1. [10] Let (X,,0) be a gBCH-algebra. If xX, then there exists a unique x0Med(X) such that xB(x0).

    Theorem 2. [10] Let (X,,0) be a gBCH-algebra and x0,x1Med(X). Then

    (ⅰ) 0(xy)=(0x)(0y) for all x,yX,

    (ⅱ) x,yB(x0) if and only if xyB(0),

    (ⅲ) if yB(x0) and xy,yz, then x,zB(x0),

    (ⅳ) if x0x1, then B(x0)B(x1)=.

    Definition 3. A gBCH-algebra (X,,0) is said to be branchwise solid if, for any x,y,zB(a), where aMed(X),

    ((xy)(xz))(zy)=0, (3.1)

    i.e., (xy)(xz)zy.

    Note that if (X,,0), (Y,,0) are two gBCH-algebras then the cartesian product X×Y is also a gBCH-algebra with constant (0,0), where the binary operation "" on X×Y is defined by component-wise from the operations on X and Y, respectively, i.e., (x,a)(y,b):=(xy,ab) for any (x,a),(y,b)X×Y.

    Definition 4. A branchwise solid gBCH-algebra is said to be proper branchwise solid gBCH-algebra if it is not a BCH-algebra.

    Now, we give two examples of a proper branchwise solid gBCH-algebra as follows.

    Example 2. Let X be a gBCH-algebras as in Example 1 and Y:={0,p} with the binary operation defined by

    0p000pp0

    Then it is easy to see that Y×X is a branchwise solid gBCH-algebra, but not a BCH-algebra, since [(0,x)(0,y)](0,z)=(0,0)(0,w)=[(0,x)(0,z)](0,y). Hence it is a proper branchwise solid gBCH-algebra.

    Example 3. Let (X,,0) be a gBCH-algebras as in Example 1. Then (X×X,,(0,0)) is a proper gBCH-algebra, since [(x,w)(y,x)](z,z)=(y,0)(z,z)=(0,y) and [(x,w)(z,z)](y,x)=(z,y)(y,x)=(w,y). Moreover, [[(w,w)(z,z)][(x,x)(y,y)]][(y,y)(z,z)]=[(z,z)(y,y)][(y,y)(z,z)]=(w,w)(0,0)=(w,w)0. It shows that (X×X,,(0,0)) does not satisfy the condition (1) in Definition 3. However, routine calculations give that every branch B(a), aMed(X), satisfies the condition (1), hence it is a proper branchwise solid gBCH-algebra.

    Theorem 3. Let (X,,0) be a branchwise solid gBCH-algebra and let x,y,zB(a) where aMed(X). Then

    (i) if xy, then xzyz,

    (ii) if xy, then zyzx,

    (iii) if xy, yz, then xz,

    (iv) xy=x(x(xy)),

    (v) if xy, then z(zx)y.

    Proof. (ⅰ) Let xy. By Proposition 1 (ii), we have x0=x for all xX. It follows from (1) of Definition 3 that (xz)(yz)=((xz)0)(yz)=((xz)(xy))(yz)=0. Hence xzyz.

    (ⅱ) If xy, then xy=0 and hence (zy)(zx)=((zy)(zx))0=((zy)(zx))(xy)=0 by Proposition 1 (ii). Hence zyzx.

    (ⅲ) Let xy, yz. Then xy=0 and yz=0. By Proposition 1 (ii) and (1), we obtain xz=(xz)0=(xz)(xy)=((xz)(xy))0=((xz)(xy))(yz)=0, proving that xz.

    (ⅳ) Given x,yB(a). Since x(xy)y, so by Theorem 2 (iii), we obtain x(xy)B(a). Since X is a branchwise solid gBCH-algebra, so by Definition 3 and (IV) we have

    (xy)(x(x(xy)))(x(xy))y=0.

    On the other hand, (IV) gives (x(x(xy)))(xy)=0. So by (II), we have x(x(xy))=xy.

    (ⅴ) Let xy. Since z(zx)x and xB(a), by Theorem 2 (iii), we have z(zx)B(a) and z(zx)xy. By Theorem 3.1 (iii), we obtain z(zx)y.

    Definition 5. A branchwise solid gBCH-algebra (X,,0) is said to be branchwise strongly solid if, for any x,y,zB(a), where aMed(X),

    (xy)z=(xz)y. (4.1)

    To demonstrate the significance of this notion, we provide some examples. It is easy to see that Examples 1, 2 and 3 are branchwise strongly solid gBCH-algebras.

    Example 4. Let Z:={0,a,b,c,d} be a set with the following table:

    0abcd00000daa00adbbb00dcccc0dddddd0

    Then (Z,,0) is a gBCH-algebra. Let (X,,0) be a gBCH-algebra as in Example 1. Then (Z×X,,(0,0)) is a proper gBCH-algebra, where is defined component wise as described earlier. But, it is is not branchwise solid, since [[(a,0)(c,w)][(a,0)(b,w)]][(b,w)(c,w)]=[(a,0)(0,0)](0,0)=(a,0)(0,0)=(a,0)(0,0).

    Definition 6. A gBCH-algebra (X,,0) is said to be branchwise commutative if, for any x,yB(a), aMed(X), x(xy)=y(yx).

    The following theorem provides an equivalent condition for a branchwise strongly solid gBCH-algebra (X,,0) to be branchwise commutative.

    Theorem 4. Let (X,,0) be a branchwise strongly solid gBCH-algebra. Then it is branchwise commutative if and only if y(yx)=x(x(y(yx))), for all x,yB(a), aMed(X).

    Proof. Assume (X,,0) is branchwise commutative. Given x,yB(a),aMed(X), since y(yx)x, by Theorem 1 and Theorem 2 (iii), there exists uniquely x0Min(X) such that y(yx),xB(x0). By Theorem 2 (iv), we can show that a=x0. Since (X,,0) is branchwise commutative, by Proposition 1 (ii), we obtain

    x(x(y(yx)))=(y(yx))[(y(yx))x]=(y(yx))0=y(yx).

    Conversely, assume y(yx)=x(x(y(yx))), for all x,yB(a), for all aMed(X). By Theorem 2 (ii), we obtain yxB(0). It follows that 0(yx)=0. Since (X,,0) is a branchwise strongly solid gBCH-algebra, we have (y(yx))y=(yy)(yx)=0(yx)=0. Since x(xy)y, both x(xy) and y belong to B(a). Since (X,,0) is a branchwise strongly solid gBCH-algebra, by applying Theorem 3.1 (iv), we obtain

    [x(x(y(yx)))](x(xy))=[x(x(xy))][x(y(yx))]=(xy)[x(y(yx))]. (4.2)

    Since (X,,0) is a branchwise solid gBCH-algebra, by applying (4.2), we obtain

    [y(yx)][x(xy)]=[x(x(y(yx)))](x(xy))=(xy)[x(y(yx))](y(yx))y=0.

    This proves that y(yx)x(xy). If we interchange the role of x and y, we obtain x(xy)y(yx), proving that (X,,0) is branchwise commutative.

    Now, we introduce the notions of a branchwise implicative gBCH-algebra as well as of a branchwise positive implicative gBCH-algebra.

    Definition 7. A gBCH-algebra (X,,0) is said to be branchwise implicative if, for any x,yB(a), aMed(X), x(yx)=x.

    Definition 8. A gBCH-algebra (X,,0) is said to be branchwise positive implicative if xy=(xy)(y(0(0y))), for any x,yB(a), aMed(X).

    Theorem 5. Let (X,,0) be a branchwise strongly solid gBCH-algebra. If X is branchwise implicative, then it is branchwise commutative.

    Proof. Let x,yB(a),aMed(X). Since x(xy)y, by Theorem 2 (iii), we have x(xy)B(a). Moreover, since y(y(x(xy)))x(xy), we have y(y(x(xy)))B(a). Since (X,,0) is branchwise implicative, we obtain

    x(xy)=[x(xy)][y(x(xy))]. (4.3)

    for any x,yB(a),aMed(X). Since (X,,0) is branchwise strongly solid, we have

    [[x(xy)][y(x(xy))]][y(y(x(xy)))]=[[x(xy)][y(y(x(xy)))]][y(x(xy))]. (4.4)

    Since x(xy)y, by Theorem 3.1 (i) and (IV), we obtain

    [x(xy)][y(y(x(xy)))]y[y(y(x(xy)))]y(x(xy)).

    It follows that

    [[x(xy)][y(y(x(xy)))]][y(x(xy))]=0. (4.5)

    By (4.4) and (4.5), we obtain [[x(xy)][y(x(xy))]][y(y(x(xy)))]=0, i.e.,

    [x(xy)][y(x(xy))]y(y(x(xy))). (4.6)

    By (4.3) and (4.6), we obtain x(xy)y(y(x(xy))). By (Ⅳ), we have y(y(x(xy)))x(xy). This proves that x(xy)=y(y(x(xy))). By applying Theorem 4, (X,,0) is branchwise commutative.

    Theorem 6. Let (X,,0) be a branchwise strongly solid gBCH-algebra. If X is branchwise implicative, then it is branchwise positive implicative.

    Proof. Given x,yB(a),aMed(X), since X is branchwise strongly solid, by applying Theorem 2 (i) and Theorem 3.1 (iv), we obtain

    [(xy)(y(0(0y)))](xy)=[(xy)(xy)][y(0(0y))]=0(y(0(0y)))=(0y)(0(0(0y)))=(0y)(0y)=0.

    It follows that

    (xy)(y(0(0y)))xy (4.7)

    for any x,yB(a),aMed(X). Now, since 0(0y)y and yB(a), we have 0(0y)B(a). Since X is branchwise strongly solid, we obtain

    (y(xy))(0(0y))=[y(0(0y))](xy) (4.8)

    By Theorem 5, X is also branchwise commutative. It follows that

    (xy)[(xy)(y(0(0y)))]=[y(0(0y))][[y(0(0y))](xy)]=[y(0(0y))][(y(xy))(0(0y))][(4.8)]=[y(0(0y))][y(0(0y))][X:branch.imp.]=0.

    Hence we obtain xy(xy)(y(0(0y))). By combining it with (4.7) and using (II), we get xy=(xy)(y(0(0y))).

    The following theorem yields sufficient conditions for a branchwise strongly solid gBCH-algebra (X,,0) to be branchwise implicative.

    Theorem 7. Let (X,,0) be a branchwise strongly solid, branchwise commutative and branchwise positive implicative gBCH-algebra. Then it is branchwise implicative.

    Proof. Given x,yB(a),aMed(X), by Theorem 2 (ii), we obtain xy,yxB(0), i.e., 0(xy)=0(yx)=0. Since X is branchwise strongly solid, we have

    (x(yx))x=(xx)(yx)=0(yx)=0.

    This shows that x(yx)x. Since xB(a), by applying Theorem 2 (iii), we obtain x(yx)B(a). If we take x0:=0(0x), then x0x and x0Min(X)=Med(X). Since xB(a), by Theorem 2 (iii), we have x0B(a). Since x0,aMed(X), by Theorem 2 (iv), we obtain a=x0. Hence

    (0(0x))(x(yx))=x0(x(yx))=a(x(yx))=0.

    Since X is branchwise commutative, by applying Theorem 4.1, we obtain

    x(x(yx))=(yx)[(yx)(x(x(yx)))]=[(yx)(x(0(0x)))][(yx)(x(x(yx)))][X:branch.pos.imp.][x(x(yx))][x(0(0x))][Definition5](0(0x))(x(yx))[Definition5]=0.

    It follows that xx(yx). Thus we proved that x=x(yx).

    The following is a consequence of the above three theorems.

    Corollary 1. A branchwise strongly solid gBCH-algebra (X,,0) is both branchwise commutative and branchwise positive implicative if and only if it is branchwise implicative.

    The theory of a gBCH-algebra is one of recent topics in the field of algebraic structures, which has attraction to many mathematicians and computer scientists. In this article, several notions such as branchwise solid gBCH-algebras, branchwise strongly solid gBCH-algebras, branchwise commutativity, branchwise implicativity and branchwise positive implicativity have been studied. Moreover, we investigated necessary and sufficient conditions for a branchwise strongly solid gBCH-algebra to be branchwise commutative. We also developed some relationships among the branchwise implicativity and the branchwise commutativity and the branchwise positive implicativity. The sufficient condition for a gBCH-algebra to be branchwise implicative has also been proved. The notion of a gBCH-algebra provides some possibility to open the doors of BCH-algebras into the area of gBCH-algebras. The areas of the categorical aspects, graph algebras, ideals and filters in gBCH-algebras will be discussed in sequel. It will also be interesting to investigate: (i) which parts of the Theorem 3 can be proved for a gBCH-algebra and whether the condition that x,y,z are from the same branch B(a) is necessary or it may be relaxed for some parts? and (ii) an example of a branchwise solid gBCH-algebra which is not branchwise strongly solid gBCH-algebra.

    All the authors are thankful to their respective institutions for providing excellent research facilities. Moreover, the second and fourth authors are also thankful to Higher Education Commission of Pakistan. The research of the third author was supported by the Guangzhou Academician and Expert Workstation (No. 20200115-9).

    The authors hereby declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.



    [1] M. Adam, D. Aggeli, A. Aretaki, Some new bounds on the spectral radius of nonnegative matrices, AIMS Mathematics, 5 (2019), 701-716.
    [2] C. Berge, Hypergraph, Combinatorics of Finite Sets, 3 Eds., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973.
    [3] R. A. Brualdi, Introductory Combinatorics, 3 Eds., China Machine press, Beijing, 2002.
    [4] K. C. Chang, K. Pearson, T. Zhang, Perron-Frobenius theorem for nonnegative tensors, Commun. Math. Sci., 6 (2008), 507-520.
    [5] D. M. Chen, Z. B. Chen, X. D. Zhang, Spectral radius of uniform hypergraphs and degree sequences, Front. Math. China., 6 (2017), 1279-1288.
    [6] Z. M. Chen, L. Q. Qi, Circulant tensors with applications to spectral hypergraph theory and stochastic process, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 12 (2016), 1227-1247.
    [7] J. Cooper, A. Dutle, Spectral of uniform hypergraph, Linear Algebra Appl., 436 (2012), 3268-3292.
    [8] X. Duan, B. Zhou, Sharp bounds on the spectral radius of a nonnegative matrix, Linear Algebra Appl., 439 (2013), 2961-2970.
    [9] A. Ducournau, A. Bretto, Random walks in directed hypergraphs and application to semisupervised image segmentation, Comput. Vis. Image Und., 120 (2014), 91-102.
    [10] S. Friedland, A. Gaubert, L. Han, Perron-Frobenius theorems for nonnegative multilinear forms and extensions, Linear Algebra Appl., 438 (2013), 738-749.
    [11] G. Gallo, G. Longo, S. Pallottino, et al. Directed hypergraphs and applications, Discrete Appl. Math., 42 (1993), 177-201.
    [12] M. Khan, Y. Fan, On the spectral radius of a class of non-odd-bipartite even uniform hypergraphs, Linear Algebra Appl., 480 (2015), 93-106.
    [13] C. Q. Li, Y. T. Li, X. Kong, New eigenvalue inclusion sets for tensors, Numer. Linear Algebra Appl., 21 (2014), 39-50.
    [14] K. Li, L. S. Wang, A polynomial time approximation scheme for embedding a directed hypergraph on a ring, Inform. Process. Lett., 97 (2006), 203-207.
    [15] W. Li, K. N. Michael, Some bounds for the spectral radius of nonnegative tensors, Numer. Math., 130 (2015), 315-335.
    [16] L. H. Lim, Singular values and eigenvalues of tensors: A variational approach, In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing (CAMSAP 05), 1 (2005), 129-132.
    [17] L. H. Lim, Foundations of Numerical Multilinear Algebra: Decomposition and Approximation of Tensors, Dissertation, 2007.
    [18] L. H. Lim, Eigenvalues of Tensors and Some Very Basic Spectral Hypergraph Theory, Matrix Computations and Scientific Computing Seminar, 2008.
    [19] H. Y. Lin, B. Mo, B. Zhou, et al. Sharp bounds for ordinary and signless Laplacian spectral radii of uniform hypergraphs, Appl. Math. Comput., 285 (2016), 217-227.
    [20] C. Lv, L. H. You, X. D. Zhang, A Sharp upper bound on the spectral radius of a nonnegative k-uniform tensor and its applications to (directed) hypergraphs, J. Inequal. Appl., 32 (2020), 1-16.
    [21] H. Minc, Nonnegative Matrices, John and Sons Inc., New York, 1988.
    [22] K. Pearson, T. Zhang, On spectral hypergraph theory of the adjacency tensor, Graphs Combin., 30 (2014), 1233-1248.
    [23] L. Q. Qi, Eigenvalues of a real supersymmetric tensor, J. Symbolic Comput, 40 (2005), 1302-1324.
    [24] L. Q. Qi, H+-eigenvalues of Laplacian and signless Lapaclian tensors, Commun. Math. Sci., 12 (2014), 1045-1064.
    [25] J. Y. Shao, A general product of tensors with applications, Linear Algebra Appl., 439 (2013), 2350-2366.
    [26] J. Y. Shao, H. Y. Shan, L. Zhang, On some properties of the determinants of tensors, Linear Algebra Appl., 439 (2013), 3057-3069.
    [27] R. Xing, B. Zhou, Sharp bounds on the spectral radius of a nonnegative matrix, Linear Algebra Appl., 449 (2014), 194-209.
    [28] J. S. Xie, L. Q. Qi, Spectral directed hypergraph theory via tensors, Linear and Multilinear Algebra, 64 (2016), 780-794.
    [29] Y. N. Yang, Q. Z. Yang, Further results for Perron-Frobenius theorem for nonnegative tensors, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 31 (2010), 2517-2530.
    [30] Y. N. Yang, Q. Z. Yang, On some properties of nonnegative weakly irreducible tensors, arXiv: 1111.0713v2, 2011.
    [31] L. H. You, X. H. Huang, X. Y. Yuan, Sharp bounds for spectral radius of nonnegative weakly irreducible tensors, Front. Math. China., 14 (2019), 989-1015.
    [32] X. Y. Yuan, M. Zhang, M. Lu, Some upper bounds on the eigenvalues of uniform hypergraphs, Linear Algebra Appl., 484 (2015), 540-549.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Muhammad Anwar Chaudhry, Asfand Fahad, Muhammad Imran Qureshi, Urwa Riasat, Musavarah Sarwar, Some Results about Weak UP-algebras, 2022, 2022, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2022/1206804
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4756) PDF downloads(319) Cited by(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog