Research article

A multiscale model for tensile response of fique fiber-reinforced composite laminates

  • Published: 21 May 2026
  • The incorporation of natural fibers into composite materials has attracted growing interest due to their low cost, regional availability, and reduced environmental impact. However, their adoption in industrial applications remains limited by the absence of reliable predictive models linking constituent properties with the laminate's macroscopic behavior. In this context, this work developed and validated a multiscale predictive model to estimate the tensile behavior of laminates reinforced with fique fiber. The approach first evaluates classical micromechanical predictions (Chamis model) against experimentally characterized ply properties, demonstrating that idealized analytical formulations fail to capture the structural heterogeneity of twisted natural fibers. Consequently, experimentally obtained ply data were used as direct inputs for classical laminate theory (CLT) and finite element method (FEM) simulations to ensure accurate laminate-level predictions. The predictions were experimentally validated according to ASTM D3039 in [0°/90°/0°], [90°/0°/90°], and [90°/0°/45°] configurations. The results showed that the Chamis model systematically underestimates longitudinal strength and overestimates transverse stiffness due to assumptions that do not accurately represent natural fibers. In contrast, when both CLT and FEM were informed by the experimental properties of the unidirectional ply, they achieved predictions consistent with the tests: the combined coefficient of determination of 0.69 for CLT and 0.70 for FEM, with mean absolute errors of 16.65 and 16.04 MPa, respectively.

    Citation: Sergio A. Gomez-Suarez, Joszaira Lárez-Natera. A multiscale model for tensile response of fique fiber-reinforced composite laminates[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2026, 13(3): 410-443. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2026021

    Related Papers:

  • The incorporation of natural fibers into composite materials has attracted growing interest due to their low cost, regional availability, and reduced environmental impact. However, their adoption in industrial applications remains limited by the absence of reliable predictive models linking constituent properties with the laminate's macroscopic behavior. In this context, this work developed and validated a multiscale predictive model to estimate the tensile behavior of laminates reinforced with fique fiber. The approach first evaluates classical micromechanical predictions (Chamis model) against experimentally characterized ply properties, demonstrating that idealized analytical formulations fail to capture the structural heterogeneity of twisted natural fibers. Consequently, experimentally obtained ply data were used as direct inputs for classical laminate theory (CLT) and finite element method (FEM) simulations to ensure accurate laminate-level predictions. The predictions were experimentally validated according to ASTM D3039 in [0°/90°/0°], [90°/0°/90°], and [90°/0°/45°] configurations. The results showed that the Chamis model systematically underestimates longitudinal strength and overestimates transverse stiffness due to assumptions that do not accurately represent natural fibers. In contrast, when both CLT and FEM were informed by the experimental properties of the unidirectional ply, they achieved predictions consistent with the tests: the combined coefficient of determination of 0.69 for CLT and 0.70 for FEM, with mean absolute errors of 16.65 and 16.04 MPa, respectively.



    加载中


    [1] Ahmad W, McCormack SJ, Byrne A (2025) Biocomposites for sustainable construction: A review of material properties, applications, research gaps, and contribution to circular economy. J Build Eng 105: 112525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112525 doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112525
    [2] Vishwash B, Shivakumar ND, Sachidananda KB (2025) A brief review on natural fiber reinforced composite sandwich structures. Next Res 2: 100474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexres.2025.100474 doi: 10.1016/j.nexres.2025.100474
    [3] Mulenga TK, Rangappa SM, Siengchin S (2025) Impact behavior of natural fiber composites: A comprehensive review on theoretical and computational modeling. Next Mater 8: 100849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.100849 doi: 10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.100849
    [4] Ajayi NE, Rusnakova S, Ajayi AE, et al. (2025) A comprehensive review of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites as emerging materials for sustainable applications. Appl Mater Today 43: 102666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2025.102666 doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2025.102666
    [5] Wadgave I, Kulkarni S, Katekar S, et al. (2024) A comprehensive review on: Mechanical and acoustical characterization of natural fiber-reinforced composite. Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2024.05.002 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2024.05.002
    [6] Mohammed M, Oleiwi JK, Mohammed AM, et al. (2024) A review on the advancement of renewable natural fiber hybrid composites: prospects, challenges, and industrial applications. J Renew Mater 12: 1237–1290. https://doi.org/10.32604/jrm.2024.051201 doi: 10.32604/jrm.2024.051201
    [7] Muñoz-Blandón O, Ramírez-Carmona M, Rendón-Castrillón L, et al. (2023) Exploring the potential of fique fiber as a natural composite material: A comprehensive characterization study. Polymers 15: 2712. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122712 doi: 10.3390/polym15122712
    [8] Rendón-Castrillón L, Ramírez-Carmona M, Ocampo-López C, et al. (2022) The industrial potential of fique cultivated in Colombia. Sustainability 15: 695. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010695 doi: 10.3390/su15010695
    [9] Laverde Sarmiento V, Benjumea JM, Rincón Ortiz M (2025) Chemical and mechanical characterization of treated and untreated woven fique fiber textiles as an alternative external reinforcement for concrete. J Nat Fibers 22: 2462975. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2025.2462975 doi: 10.1080/15440478.2025.2462975
    [10] Pabón Rojas JJ, Ramón Valencia BA, Bolívar Osorio FJ, et al. (2021) The role of fiber-matrix compatibility in vacuum processed natural fiber/epoxy biocomposites. Cellulose 28: 7845–7857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04055-7 doi: 10.1007/s10570-021-04055-7
    [11] Rua J, Buchely MF, Monteiro SN, et al. (2021) Impact behavior of laminated composites built with fique fibers and epoxy resin: A mechanical analysis using impact and flexural behavior. J Mater Res Technol 14: 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.06.068 doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.06.068
    [12] Gómez-Suarez SA, Córdoba-Tuta E (2022) Composite materials reinforced with fique fibers—A review. Rev UIS Ing 21: 163–178. https://doi.org/10.18273/revuin.v21n1-2022013 doi: 10.18273/revuin.v21n1-2022013
    [13] Barros FA, Gamboa JM, Díaz-Ramírez GA, et al. (2019) Numerical and experimental study of flexural behaviour in polymer composite materials reinforced with natural fique textiles. J Phys Conf Ser 1247: 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1247/1/012001 doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1247/1/012001
    [14] González-Estrada OA, Díaz-Ramírez G, Quiroga Mendez JE (2018) Mechanical response and damage of woven composite materials reinforced with fique. Key Eng Mater 774: 143–148. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.774.143 doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.774.143
    [15] Chaves Garcia MC, Castro Bermudez JD, Pertuz Comas AD (2024) Uniaxial fatigue study of a natural-based bio-composite material reinforced with fique natural fibers. Frat Ed Integrità Strutt 18: 94–108. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.68.06 doi: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.68.06
    [16] Avila De Cêa BS, Pereira Junio RF, Silva DS, et al. (2025) An experimental and numerical study of the ballistic behavior of an epoxy matrix hybrid composite reinforced with aramid fabric and fique fabric. J Mater Res Technol 35: 2037–2054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.01.172 doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.01.172
    [17] Castro D, Pertuz A, León-Becerra J (2022) Mechanical behavior analysis of a vertical axis wind turbine blade made with fique-epoxy composite using FEM. Procedia Comput Sci 203: 310–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.07.039 doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.07.039
    [18] Gómez S, Ramón B, Guzmán R (2018) Análisis modal de material compuesto de resina bioepoxy/fibra de fique. Entre Cienc E Ing 12: 78–83. https://doi.org/10.31908/19098367.3706 doi: 10.31908/19098367.3706
    [19] Gómez SA, Córdoba E, Vega Mesa C, et al. (2021) Manufacture of student chair in composite material reinforced with fique fiber. Sci Tech 26: 6–13. https://doi.org/10.22517/23447214.24509 doi: 10.22517/23447214.24509
    [20] Wang W, Wang H, Fei S, et al. (2022) Concurrent multiscale modeling of in-plane micro-damage evaluation in Z-pinned composite laminates. Compos Struct 295: 115842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115842 doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115842
    [21] Hou Y, Wang W, Meng L, et al. (2022) An insight into the mechanical behavior of adhesively bonded plain-woven-composite joints using multiscale modeling. Int J Mech Sci 219: 107063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107063 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107063
    [22] Zhang M, Yu Y, Li L, et al. (2024) A molecular dynamics assisted insight on damping enhancement in carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites with oriented multilayer graphene oxide coatings. Microstructures 4: 2024051. https://doi.org/10.20517/microstructures.2024.29 doi: 10.20517/microstructures.2024.29
    [23] Shu W, Stanciulescu I (2020) Multiscale homogenization method for the prediction of elastic properties of fiber-reinforced composites. Int J Solids Struct 203: 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.08.009 doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.08.009
    [24] Fedorenko A, Zhao C, Liu H, et al. (2026) Damage-rate-dependent model for impact crushing of thin-ply CFRP tubes. Int J Mech Sci 313: 111268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2026.111268 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2026.111268
    [25] Govilas J, Chevallier A, Akleh W, et al. (2024) Mechanical behavior and apparent stiffness of flax, hemp and nettle fibers under single fiber transverse compression tests. Compos Part A 185: 108321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108321 doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108321
    [26] Piggott MR (1980) Failure processes, In: Piggott MR, Load-Bearing Fibre Composites, Oxford: Pergamon, 100–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-024231-6.50011-8
    [27] Callister WD, Rethwisch DG (2020) Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction: SI Version, 10th Eds., Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
    [28] Wang Y, Huang Z (2017) A review of analytical micromechanics models on composite elastoplastic behaviour. Procedia Eng 173: 1283–1290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.159 doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.159
    [29] Raju B, Hiremath SR, Roy Mahapatra D (2018) A review of micromechanics based models for effective elastic properties of reinforced polymer matrix composites. Compos Struct 204: 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.125 doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.125
    [30] Habbar G, Maizia A, Hocine A, et al. (2022) Micromechanical analysis of a bio-sandwich application for cylinder under pressure. J Compos Sci 6: 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs6030069 doi: 10.3390/jcs6030069
    [31] Yan W, Shi S, Xiao L, et al. (2024) The influence of the interface on the micromechanical behavior of unidirectional fiber-reinforced ceramic matrix composites: An analysis based on the periodic symmetric boundary conditions. Symmetry 16: 695. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16060695 doi: 10.3390/sym16060695
    [32] Jones RM (1999) Mechanics of Composite Materials, 2nd Eds., Boca Raton: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781498711067
    [33] Lakshmi Narayana V, Bhaskara Rao L (2021) A brief review on the effect of alkali treatment on mechanical properties of various natural fiber reinforced polymer composites. Mater Today Proc 44: 1988–1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.117 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.117
    [34] Shelly D, Singhal V, Jaidka S, et al. (2025) Mechanical performance of bio‐based fiber reinforced polymer composites: A review. Polym Compos 46: 9–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.30000 doi: 10.1002/pc.30000
    [35] Mehdikhani M, Gorbatikh L, Verpoest I, et al. (2019) Voids in fiber-reinforced polymer composites: A review on their formation, characteristics, and effects on mechanical performance. J Compos Mater 53: 1579–1669. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998318772152 doi: 10.1177/0021998318772152
    [36] Rodríguez LJ, Sarache WA, Orrego CE (2014) Compuestos de poliéster reforzados con fibra de plátano/banano (Musa paradisiaca) modificada químicamente: comparación con fibra de vidrio y fique (Furcraea andina). Inf Tecnol 25: 27–34. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642014000500005 doi: 10.4067/S0718-07642014000500005
    [37] Ng WK, Johar M, Israr HA, et al. (2020) A review on the interfacial characteristics of natural fibre reinforced polymer composites, In: Goh KL, MK A, Silva RTD, et al., Interfaces in Particle and Fibre Reinforced Composites, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 163–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102665-6.00007-8
    [38] Zhou D, Tong X, Liu H, et al. (2024) A modified Halpin–Tsai model for predicting the elastic modulus of composite materials. AIP Adv 14: 015157. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0160256 doi: 10.1063/5.0160256
    [39] Yang L, Gao J, Zhang R, et al. (2026) Microscale modeling and damage mechanisms of fiber-reinforced composites with perpendicularly embedded optical fibers. Polym Compos 47: 6550–6560. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.70573 doi: 10.1002/pc.70573
    [40] Ramam R, Padal KT (2022) Effect of fiber orientation on the mechanical properties of natural fiber epoxy reinforced composites of flax, hemp, and kenaf. Int J Adv Technol Eng Explor 9: 72–81. https://doi.org/10.19101/IJATEE.2021.874747 doi: 10.19101/IJATEE.2021.874747
    [41] Hossain MS, Anwar MS, Islam MS, et al. (2024) Effect of fiber orientation and volume fraction on Young's modulus for unidirectional carbon fiber reinforced composites: A numerical investigation. Malays J Compos Sci Manuf 13: 45–54. https://doi.org/10.37934/mjcsm.13.1.4554 doi: 10.37934/mjcsm.13.1.4554
    [42] Memarzadeh A, Onyibo EC, Asmael M, et al. (2024) Dynamic effect of ply angle and fiber orientation on composite plates. Spectr Mech Eng Oper Res 1: 90–110. https://doi.org/10.31181/smeor11202410 doi: 10.31181/smeor11202410
    [43] Rajpurohit SR, Dave HK, Bodaghi M (2024) Classical laminate theory for flexural strength prediction of FDM 3D printed PLAs. Mater Today Proc 101: 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.310 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.310
    [44] Castilho E, Firmo JP, Garrido M, et al. (2025) Application of classical laminate theory to predict the effect of elevated temperature on the elastic modulus of GFRP composites. Constr Build Mater 494: 143445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.143445 doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.143445
    [45] Mulenga TK, Ude AU, Vivekanandhan C (2021) Techniques for modelling and optimizing the mechanical properties of natural fiber composites: A review. Fibers 9: 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib9010006 doi: 10.3390/fib9010006
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(217) PDF downloads(7) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(21)  /  Tables(5)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog