Polyester-based materials are widely used in insulation systems due to their low cost and relatively low thermal conductivity; however, further reduction in heat transfer is desirable for building envelope components exposed to elevated surface temperatures. In this study, polyester–silica aerogel composite insulation tiles were fabricated and systematically evaluated to identify the filler concentration that minimizes thermal conductivity while maintaining practical curing integrity. Silica aerogel powder was incorporated into unsaturated polyester resin at 1–5 wt.% (relative to resin mass) using methyl ethyl ketone peroxide (MEKP) as the hardener and cobalt naphthenate as the accelerator, and glass-fiber reinforcement was applied as a constant layup to enhance structural integrity. Curing was performed at 120 ℃. The resulting composites were characterized using Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and steady-state thermal conductivity measurement suing a guarded heat flow meter, indicating retention of the polyester chemical structure, predominantly amorphous composite formation, and improved high temperature thermal resistance with increasing silica content. The monotonic reduction in thermal conductivity was consistent with interruption of continuous matrix conduction pathways and increased thermal boundary resistance introduced by dispersed, ultra-low-conductivity aerogel domains within the polyester matrix. Thermal conductivity was measured under steady-state conditions at 55 ℃ using a guarded heat flow meter in triplicate (N = 3). The thermal conductivity decreased from 0.2800 ± 0.0030 W m−1 K−1 at 1 wt.% SiO2 to 0.2300 ± 0.0036 W m−1 K−1 at 5 wt.% SiO2, corresponding to an overall reduction of 0.0500 W m−1 K−1 (17.9%) within the investigated range. TGA results further indicated a major decomposition event over approximately 390–500 ℃, with composition-dependent residues increasing with silica loading, consistent with enhanced thermal resistance at elevated temperatures. Overall, 5 wt.% silica aerogel provides the lowest measured thermal conductivity among the tested formulations and supports the potential of these polyester-based composites for rigid insulation tile applications with practical curing feasibility for roof and building-envelope use.
Citation: Muhammad Zubair Farrukh, Muhammad Arslan, Zaheer Uddin Kamran, Ahmed Usman Yasir. Experimental thermal-stability evaluation of polyester/silica aerogel composites for building insulation at elevated temperature[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2026, 13(2): 391-409. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2026020
Polyester-based materials are widely used in insulation systems due to their low cost and relatively low thermal conductivity; however, further reduction in heat transfer is desirable for building envelope components exposed to elevated surface temperatures. In this study, polyester–silica aerogel composite insulation tiles were fabricated and systematically evaluated to identify the filler concentration that minimizes thermal conductivity while maintaining practical curing integrity. Silica aerogel powder was incorporated into unsaturated polyester resin at 1–5 wt.% (relative to resin mass) using methyl ethyl ketone peroxide (MEKP) as the hardener and cobalt naphthenate as the accelerator, and glass-fiber reinforcement was applied as a constant layup to enhance structural integrity. Curing was performed at 120 ℃. The resulting composites were characterized using Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and steady-state thermal conductivity measurement suing a guarded heat flow meter, indicating retention of the polyester chemical structure, predominantly amorphous composite formation, and improved high temperature thermal resistance with increasing silica content. The monotonic reduction in thermal conductivity was consistent with interruption of continuous matrix conduction pathways and increased thermal boundary resistance introduced by dispersed, ultra-low-conductivity aerogel domains within the polyester matrix. Thermal conductivity was measured under steady-state conditions at 55 ℃ using a guarded heat flow meter in triplicate (N = 3). The thermal conductivity decreased from 0.2800 ± 0.0030 W m−1 K−1 at 1 wt.% SiO2 to 0.2300 ± 0.0036 W m−1 K−1 at 5 wt.% SiO2, corresponding to an overall reduction of 0.0500 W m−1 K−1 (17.9%) within the investigated range. TGA results further indicated a major decomposition event over approximately 390–500 ℃, with composition-dependent residues increasing with silica loading, consistent with enhanced thermal resistance at elevated temperatures. Overall, 5 wt.% silica aerogel provides the lowest measured thermal conductivity among the tested formulations and supports the potential of these polyester-based composites for rigid insulation tile applications with practical curing feasibility for roof and building-envelope use.
| [1] |
Benfars M, Alioui A, Azalam Y, et al. (2024) Impact of ecological thermal roof insulation on the energy efficiency of conventional buildings in a semi-arid climate. Sol Energy Sustain Dev J 14: 78–88. https://doi.org/10.51646/jsesd.v14iSI_MSMS2E.401 doi: 10.51646/jsesd.v14iSI_MSMS2E.401
|
| [2] |
Cavadini GB, Cook LM (2021) Green and cool roof choices integrated into rooftop solar energy modelling. Appl Energy 296: 117082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117082 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117082
|
| [3] |
Ong KS (2011) Temperature reduction in attic and ceiling via insulation of several passive roof designs. Energy Convers Manag 52: 2405–2411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.12.044 doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.12.044
|
| [4] |
Abbas HM, Hussein AA (2025) Enhancing building roof insulation: A comparative examination of PCM layers integrated with and without nanoparticles. Int J Thermofluids 27: 101286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2025.101286 doi: 10.1016/j.ijft.2025.101286
|
| [5] |
Ho ML, Yew MC, Yew MK, et al. (2024) Novel cool roofing technology system with sustainable design for attic temperature reduction. Ain Shams Eng J 15: 102706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.102706 doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2024.102706
|
| [6] |
Abu-Jdayil B, Abdallah HA, Mlhem A, et al. (2022) Utilization of polyurethane foam dust in development of thermal insulation composite. Buildings 12: 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020126 doi: 10.3390/buildings12020126
|
| [7] |
Sudirman, Anggaravidya M, Budianto E, et al. (2012) Synthesis and characterization of polyester-based nanocomposites. Procedia Chem 4: 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proche.2012.06.016 doi: 10.1016/j.proche.2012.06.016
|
| [8] | Rana S, Fangueiro R (2016) 1–Advanced composites in aerospace engineering, In: Rana S, Fangueiro R, Advanced Composite Materials for Aerospace Engineering, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100037-3.00001-8 |
| [9] |
Poorabdollah M, Beheshty MH, Atai M (2016) Investigating curing kinetics and structural relaxation phenomena of unsaturated polyester resin containing silanized silica. J Compos Mater 50: 2459–2467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998315604207 doi: 10.1177/0021998315604207
|
| [10] |
Gao Y, Romero P, Zhang H, et al. (2019) Unsaturated polyester resin concrete: A review. Constr Build Mater 228: 116709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116709 doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116709
|
| [11] |
Tarrio-Saavedra J, López-Beceiro J, Naya S, et al. (2008) Effect of silica content on thermal stability of fumed silica/epoxy composites. Polym Degrad Stab 93: 2133–2137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.08.006 doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.08.006
|
| [12] |
Dowou K, Nougbléga Y, Toka KA, et al. (2025) Numerical study of integrating thermal insulation local bio-sourced materials into walls and roofs for thermal comfort improvement in buildings in a tropical climate. Constr Mater 5: 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/constrmater5010004 doi: 10.3390/constrmater5010004
|
| [13] |
Kumar A, Suman BM (2013) Experimental evaluation of insulation materials for walls and roofs and their impact on indoor thermal comfort under composite climate. Build Environ 59: 635–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.09.023 doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.09.023
|
| [14] |
Vargas MA, Sachsenheimer K, Guthausen G (2012) In-situ investigations of the curing of a polyester resin. Polym Test 31: 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.10.004 doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.10.004
|
| [15] |
Guo Z, Du S, Zhang B, et al. (2005) Cure kinetics of T700/BMI prepreg used for advanced thermoset composites. J Appl Polym Sci 97: 2238–2241. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.21879 doi: 10.1002/app.21879
|
| [16] | Alves FJL, Baptista AM, Marques AT (2016) 3–Metal and ceramic matrix composites in aerospace engineering, In: Rana S, Fangueiro R, Advanced Composite Materials for Aerospace Engineering, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 59–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100037-3.00003-1 |
| [17] | Nunes JP, Silva JF (2016) 5–Sandwiched composites in aerospace engineering, In: Rana S, Fangueiro R, Advanced Composite Materials for Aerospace Engineering, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 129–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100037-3.00005-5 |
| [18] |
Aggarwal C, Molleti S (2024) State-of-the-art review: Effects of using cool building cladding materials on roofs. Buildings 14: 2257. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082257 doi: 10.3390/buildings14082257
|
| [19] |
Chencheni A, Belkhiri S, Tarchoun AF, et al. (2024) Thermal behavior and kinetics of unsaturated polyester resin supplemented with organo-nanoclay. RSC Adv 14: 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA06076D doi: 10.1039/D3RA06076D
|
| [20] |
Barile C, Casavola C, De Cillis F (2019) Mechanical comparison of new composite materials for aerospace applications. Compos Part B Eng 162: 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.101 doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.101
|
| [21] |
Abliz D, Duan Y, Steuernagel L, et al. (2013) Curing methods for advanced polymer composites: A review. Polym Polym Compos 21: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/096739111302100602 doi: 10.1177/096739111302100602
|
| [22] |
Zhang Y, Huang J, Fang X, et al. (2020) Optimal roof structure with multilayer cooling function materials for building energy saving. Int J Energy Res 44: 1594–1606. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4969 doi: 10.1002/er.4969
|
| [23] |
Maria M (2013) Advanced composite materials of the future in aerospace industry. Incas Bull 5: 139–150. https://doi.org/10.13111/2066-8201.2013.5.3.14 doi: 10.13111/2066-8201.2013.5.3.14
|
| [24] |
Wang X, Gao X, Zhang Z, et al. (2021) Advances in modifications and high-temperature applications of silicon carbide ceramic matrix composites in aerospace. J Eur Ceram Soc 41: 4671–4688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.03.051 doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.03.051
|
| [25] |
Rajak DK, Pagar DD, Menezes PL, et al. (2019) Fiber-reinforced polymer composites: Manufacturing, properties, and applications. Polymers 11: 1667. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11101667 doi: 10.3390/polym11101667
|
| [26] |
Ramachandran K, Bear JC, Jayaseelan DD (2025) Oxide-based ceramic matrix composites for high-temperature environments: A review. Adv Eng Mater 27: 2402000. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202402000 doi: 10.1002/adem.202402000
|
| [27] |
Malinverni C, Salvo M, De Zanet A, et al. (2023) Glass-ceramics for joining oxide-based ceramic matrix composites operating under direct flame exposure. J Eur Ceram Soc 43: 3621–3629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.02.019 doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.02.019
|
| [28] |
Talebi Z, Soltani P, Habibi N, et al. (2019) Silica aerogel/polyester blankets for efficient sound absorption in buildings. Constr Build Mater 220: 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.031 doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.031
|
| [29] |
Salmoria GV, Ahrens CH, Beal VE, et al. (2009) Evaluation of post-curing and laser manufacturing parameters on properties of SOMOS 7110 resin. Mater Des 30: 758–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.05.016 doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.05.016
|
| [30] |
Zhang L, Zhang H, Guo J (2012) Synthesis and properties of UV-curable polyester-based waterborne polyurethane/functionalized silica composites and morphology of their nanostructured films. Ind Eng Chem Res 51: 8434–8441. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie3000248 doi: 10.1021/ie3000248
|
| [31] |
Khankrua R, Suttiruengwong S, Hamada H (2013) Thermal and mechanical properties of biodegradable polyester/silica nanocomposites. Energy Procedia 34: 815–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.803 doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.803
|
| [32] |
Lekakou C, Murugesh AK, Chen YL, et al. (2008) Processability studies of silica–thermoset polymer matrix nanocomposites. Polym Eng Sci 48: 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.20815 doi: 10.1002/pen.20815
|
| [33] |
Abu-Jdayil B, Adi M, Al Ghaferi F, et al. (2021) Physical and thermal insulation properties of the composites based on seawater-neutralised bauxite residue. J Hazard Mater 403: 123723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123723 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123723
|
| [34] |
Du S, Guo ZS, Zhang B, et al. (2004) Cure kinetics of epoxy resin used for advanced composites. Polym Int 53: 1343–1347. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.1533 doi: 10.1002/pi.1533
|
| [35] |
Huang C, Qian X, Yang R (2018) Thermal conductivity of polymers and polymer nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 132: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2018.06.002 doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2018.06.002
|
| [36] |
Han Z, Fina A (2011) Thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes and their polymer nanocomposites: A review. Prog Polym Sci 36: 914–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.11.004 doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.11.004
|
| [37] |
Chen H, Ginzburg VV, Yang J, et al. (2016) Thermal conductivity of polymer-based composites: Fundamentals and applications. Prog Polym Sci 53: 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.03.001 doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.03.001
|
| [38] |
Burger N, Laachachi A, Ferriol M, et al. (2016) Review of thermal conductivity in composites: Mechanisms, parameters and theory. Prog Polym Sci 62: 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.05.001 doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.05.001
|
| [39] |
Palacios A, Cabezón L, Navarro ME, et al. (2019) Thermal conductivity measurement techniques for characterizing thermal energy storage materials: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 111: 224–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.020 doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.020
|
| [40] |
Dai H, Wang R (2022) Methods for measuring thermal conductivity of two-dimensional materials: A review. Nanomaterials 12: 589. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12040589 doi: 10.3390/nano12040589
|
matersci-13-02-020-Supplementary.pdf |
![]() |