Research article

When should manufacturers introduce live broadcast channels? Impact of asymmetry network externality

  • Published: 21 January 2026
  • 90B06

  • The emergence of new distribution channels presents both opportunities and challenges for manufacturers. We compare the live broadcast dual channel with the agency dual channel in the presence of information symmetric and information asymmetric of network externalities. Our analysis shows that the manufacturer's optimal channel strategy is related to the network externality, the proportion of potential consumers in the direct channel and spillover effects. The manufacturer may adopt the live broadcast channel only if the proportion of potential consumers is small and the network externality is strong. Moreover, stronger positive spillover effects will incentivize the manufacturer to choose the live broadcast channel, while stronger negative spillover effects will drive the manufacturer to use the agency channel. This suggests that the direction of spillover effects also affect manufacturers' preferences. By comparing profits under different information structures, we show that the asymmetry of network externality can weaken the manufacturer's incentives to adopt the live broadcast channel. These new findings underscore the need for manufacturers to take various factors into account when selecting a distribution channel. These findings offer novel insights into the adoption of the live broadcast channel by manufacturers.

    Citation: Fengzhi Liu, Chunqiu Xu. When should manufacturers introduce live broadcast channels? Impact of asymmetry network externality[J]. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2026, 22(2): 971-996. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2026036

    Related Papers:

  • The emergence of new distribution channels presents both opportunities and challenges for manufacturers. We compare the live broadcast dual channel with the agency dual channel in the presence of information symmetric and information asymmetric of network externalities. Our analysis shows that the manufacturer's optimal channel strategy is related to the network externality, the proportion of potential consumers in the direct channel and spillover effects. The manufacturer may adopt the live broadcast channel only if the proportion of potential consumers is small and the network externality is strong. Moreover, stronger positive spillover effects will incentivize the manufacturer to choose the live broadcast channel, while stronger negative spillover effects will drive the manufacturer to use the agency channel. This suggests that the direction of spillover effects also affect manufacturers' preferences. By comparing profits under different information structures, we show that the asymmetry of network externality can weaken the manufacturer's incentives to adopt the live broadcast channel. These new findings underscore the need for manufacturers to take various factors into account when selecting a distribution channel. These findings offer novel insights into the adoption of the live broadcast channel by manufacturers.



    加载中


    [1] S. Singh, N. Singh, Z. Kalinić, F. J. Liébana-Cabanillas, Assessing determinants influencing continued use of live streaming services: An extended perceived value theory of streaming addiction, Expert Syst. Appl., 168 (2021), 114241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114241 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114241
    [2] K. Picot-Coupey, Y. Bouragba, I. C. Lachaud, M. G. Gallarza, Y. Ouazzani, Live streaming shopping as a new retail format: insights from a qualitative study of consumers and retailers, Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag., 51 (2023), 1313–1351. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-12-2022-0505 doi: 10.1108/IJRDM-12-2022-0505
    [3] ChinaIRN, Development status, market penetration, and industry pain points of the live e-commerce sector in 2024, 2024. Available from: https://www.chinairn.com/hyzx/20241120/173226520.shtml.
    [4] R. Pan, J. Feng, Z. L Zhao, Fly with the wings of live-stream selling channel strategies with/without switching demand, Prod. Oper. Manag., 31 (2022), 3387–3399. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13784 doi: 10.1111/poms.13784
    [5] T. Wang, Commission incentives and power structures in live-stream: exploring dynamic commission rate and wholesale price, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 21 (2025), 4474–4502. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2025061 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2025061
    [6] NetEase, Transactions in the live-streaming market: evidence from repeated collaborations with a top streamer and substantial merchant losses, NetEase, 2020. Available from: https://www.163.com/dy/article/FF1824S10519D3UT.html.
    [7] Y. Ma, R. Zhang, An on-site case of fraud in double eleven live-streaming sales: evidence from Li xueqin's firsthand experience, Tencent Video, 2020.
    [8] Toutiao, Frequent irregularities in celebrity live-streaming sales: false advertising, data manipulation, and potential solutions for the industry, Toutiao, 2025. Available from: https://www.toutiao.com/article/7479765157057479208/.
    [9] U. Okongwu, M. Lauras, J. François, J. C. Deschamps, Impact of the integration of tactical supply chain planning determinants on performance, J. Manuf. Syst., 38 (2016), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.10.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.10.003
    [10] B. C. Giri, A. Chakraborty, T. Maiti, Pricing and return product collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with dual-channel in both forward and reverse logistics, J. Manuf. Syst., 42 (2017), 104–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.11.007 doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2016.11.007
    [11] L. Tian, A. J. Vakharia, Y. Tan, Y. Xu, Marketplace, reseller, or hybrid: strategic analysis of an Emerging e-commerce model, Prod. Oper. Manag., 27 (2018), 1595–1610. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12885 doi: 10.1111/poms.12885
    [12] X. Pu, S. Sun, J. Shao, Direct selling, reselling, or agency selling? Manufacturer's online distribution strategies and their impact, Int. J. Electron. Commer., 24 (2020), 232–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2020.1715530 doi: 10.1080/10864415.2020.1715530
    [13] Y. Zennyo, Strategic contracting and hybrid use of agency and wholesale contracts in e-commerce platforms, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 281 (2020), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.08.026 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.08.026
    [14] H. Hu, Q. Zheng, X. A. Pan, Agency or wholesale? The role of retail pass-through, Manage. Sci., 68 (2022), 7538–7554. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4262 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2021.4262
    [15] A. M. Alaei, A. A. Taleizadeh, M. Rabbani, Marketplace, reseller, or web-store channel: the impact of return policy and cross-channel spillover from marketplace to web-store, J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 65 (2022), 102271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102271 doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102271
    [16] S. M. Gilbert, P. Hotkar, C. Liu, Channel choice via on-line platform, Prod. Oper. Manag., 33 (2024), 1373–1392. https://doi.org/10.1177/10591478241249478 doi: 10.1177/10591478241249478
    [17] Q. Wang, N. Zhao, X. Ji, Reselling or agency selling? The strategic role of live streaming commerce in distribution contract selection, Electron. Commer. Res., 24 (2022), 983–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09581-5 doi: 10.1007/s10660-022-09581-5
    [18] Y. Kwark, J. Chen, S. Raghunathan, Platform or wholesale? A strategic tool for online retailers to benefit from third-party information, Mis. Quart., 41 (2017), 763–786. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26635013
    [19] S. Zhang, J. Zhang, Agency selling or reselling: E-tailer information sharing with supplier offline entry, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 280 (2020), 134–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.07.003 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.07.003
    [20] Y. Tsunoda, Y. Zennyo, Platform information transparency and effects on third‐party suppliers and offline retailers, Prod. Oper. Manag., 30 (2021), 4219–4235. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13518 doi: 10.1111/poms.13518
    [21] R. Zhou, Y. Liao, W. Shen, S. Yang, Channel selection and fulfillment service contracts in the presence of asymmetric service information, Int. J. Product. Econ., 222 (2020), 107504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.025 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.025
    [22] Y. Bian, H. Wang, S. Yan, X. Han, Platform channel strategy of selling format: effect of asymmetric service information, Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev., 185 (2024), 103508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103508 doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2024.103508
    [23] W. Lu, X. Ji, J. Wu, Retailer's information sharing and manufacturer's channel expansion in the live-streaming e-commerce era, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 320 (2025), 527–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.09.008 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.09.008
    [24] W. Rafdinal, N. Hardiyanto, C. Juniarti, Introducing the cognitive impulse model: a cognitive framework for impulse buying behavior in flash sale live streaming, Int. J. Qual. Serv. Sci., 17 (2025), 425–449. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-07-2025-0161 doi: 10.1108/IJQSS-07-2025-0161
    [25] A. U. Rehman, L. Švecová, M. Shoaib, J. Veber, Z. Maryam, A. Ferraris, Understanding consumer impulse buying in live streaming commerce: a streamer communication style and consumer's language literacy perspectives, Int. Market Rev., 42 (2025), 1110–1145. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2024-0321 doi: 10.1108/IMR-09-2024-0321
    [26] A. P. Tedjakusuma, A. D. K. Silalahi, I. J. Eunike, D. T. T. Phuong, D. Riantama, The trust-driven path to consumer engagement behaviors: Exploring the role of streamer and platform characteristics in live-streaming E-commerce, Digit. Bus., 5 (2025), 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2025.100115 doi: 10.1016/j.digbus.2025.100115
    [27] X. P. Xu, Q. Zeng, R. Na, W. Fan, Unveiling the influence of streamer characteristics on sales performance in live streaming commerce, Electron Commer R. A., 72 (2025), 101510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2025.101510 doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2025.101510
    [28] S. F. Wang, J. M. Qiang, K. B. Yao, How does artificial intelligence digital human live streaming increase TikTok consumer repeat purchase? Interaction between vividness, telepresence, credibility and trust, J. Bus. Res., 201 (2025), 115702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115702 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115702
    [29] Y. F. Ma, J. L. Li, Z. M. Li, Y. Gong, Z. Zhao, X. Y. Wang, Mining online reviews by deep learning-based UIE-ERNIE for AI-empowered live streaming product selection, J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 87 (2025), 104382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104382 doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104382
    [30] T. Zhang, X. Guo, T. Wu, An analysis of cross-channel return processing with return-freight insurance for live streaming platforms, Comput. Ind. Eng., 174 (2022), 108805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108805 doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108805
    [31] B. L. Liu, W. L. Wang, Live commerce retailing with online influencers: two business models, Int J. Prod. Econ., 255 (2023), 108715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108715 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108715
    [32] X. Q. Cui, Y. J. Li, X. Li, S. L. Fang, Livestream e-commerce in a platform supply chain: A product-fit uncertainty reduction perspective, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 258 (2023), 108796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108796 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108796
    [33] S. Nuraisah, R. Nadlifatin, A. P. Subriadi, M. J. J. Gumasing, Live streaming commerce is considered as shoppertaiment: A systematic literature review, Procedia Comput. Sci., 234 (2024), 1020–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.092 doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.092
    [34] J. R. Liu, Q. Xu, Z. M. Sun, Joint optimization decision of online retailers' pricing and live‐streaming effort in the postepidemic era, Complexity., 2022 (2022), 8762922. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8762922 doi: 10.1155/2022/8762922
    [35] Z. F. Mao, Z. L. Du, R. Y. Yuan, Q. Q. Miao, Short-term or long-term cooperation between retailer and MCN? New launched products sales strategies in live streaming e-commerce, J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 67 (2022), 102996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102996 doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102996
    [36] B. Z. Niu, X. H. Yu, Q. Y. Li, Y. L. Wang, Gains and losses of key opinion leaders' product promotion in livestream e-commerce, Omega., 117 (2023), 102846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2023.102846 doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2023.102846
    [37] X. M. Zhang, H. R. Chen, Z. Liu, Operation strategy in an E‐commerce platform supply chain: whether and how to introduce live streaming services?, Int. T. Oper. Res., 31 (2024), 1093–1121. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13186 doi: 10.1111/itor.13186
    [38] F. Ye, L. Ji, Y. Ning, Y. Li, Influencer selection and strategic analysis for live streaming selling, J Retail Consum. Serv., 77 (2024), 103673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103673 doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103673
    [39] Y. Yu, Y. Liu, Fly or fall with the wings of live streamers? Quality signaling and platform governance in live streaming commerce, Manag. Decis. Econ., 45 (2024), 1547–1556. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4094 doi: 10.1002/mde.4094
    [40] Y. S. Huang, C. C. Fang, P. C. Lin, Y. C. Liao, Bundling and pricing decisions for bricks-and-clicks firms with consideration of network externality, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 17, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2020081 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020081
    [41] S. B. Ma, S. D. Li, A dynamic analysis of Greentech and product innovation in a monopoly with network externality, J. Ind. Manag. Optim., 21 (2025), 7062–7094. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2025160 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2025160
    [42] M. F. Niculescu, D. J. Wu, L. Z. Xu, Strategic intellectual property sharing: Competition on an open technology platform under network effects, Inform. Syst. Res., 29 (2018), 498–519. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0756 doi: 10.1287/isre.2017.0756
    [43] J. H. Chu, P. Manchanda, Quantifying cross and direct network effects in online consumer-to-consumer platforms, Market. Sci., 35 (2016), 870–893. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2016.0976 doi: 10.1287/mksc.2016.0976
    [44] G. G. Parker, M. W. V. Alstyne, Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design, Market Sci., 51 (2005), 1494–1504. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0400 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0400
    [45] B. Xu, Z. Yao, S. Y. Wu, Pricing strategies for a bundled channel with services network effects, Int. J. Prod. Res., 59 (2021), 3152–3168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1746852 doi: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1746852
    [46] Z. L. Yi, F. Li, L. J. Ma, The impact of distribution channels on trial-version provision with a positive network effect, Omega., 85 (2019), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.06.002 doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2018.06.002
    [47] V. Abhishek, K. Jerath, Z. J. Zhang, Agency selling or reselling? Channel structures in electronic retailing, Market. Sci., 62 (2016), 2259–2280. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2230 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2230
    [48] J. Song, Y. T. He, Y. R. Duan, Loss leader strategy in the live streaming considering cross-product and cross-channel spillover effects, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 2025, 109803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109803 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109803
    [49] W. Zhang, L. L. Yu, Z. Z. Wang, Live-streaming selling modes on a retail platform, Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev., 173 (2023), 103096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2023.103096 doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2023.103096
    [50] A. Y. Qi, S. Sethi, L. Q. Wei, J. X. Zhang, Top or regular influencer? Contracting in live-streaming platform selling, SSRN, 2022.
    [51] R. S. Yang, C. X. Xu, S. Lyu, Impact of pricing power and network externality in a dual-channel live-streaming supply chain, Electron Commer. Res., 2025, 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-025-09989-9 doi: 10.1007/s10660-025-09989-9
    [52] W. T. Yang, K. Govindan, J. T. Zhang, Spillover effects of live streaming selling in a dual-channel supply chain, Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev., 180 (2023), 103298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2023.103298 doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2023.103298
  • jimo-22-02-036-s001.pdf
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(184) PDF downloads(7) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(8)  /  Tables(3)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog