Research article Special Issues

Permeability of coarse silts using dissipation tests in cone penetration test: Case study, Finninmäki testing site

  • Received: 13 March 2025 Revised: 17 June 2025 Accepted: 19 August 2025 Published: 27 October 2025
  • Dissipation tests were performed at the Finninmäki testing site, Tampere, Finland, through the cone penetration test (CPTu). In these tests, both contractive and dilative behaviors were observed. The parameter $ t_{50} $, the time when 50$ \% $ of initial pore pressure, $ u_2 $, dissipates, was computed for the tests using three methods proposed in literature. Then, soil permeability, $ k $, was estimated following two approaches, using either $ t_{50} $-based empirical equations or CPTu-based methods. It was observed that the $ t_{50} $ values interpreted from the three methods were considerably different. The differences in the estimated $ t_{50} $ values led to considerably variable $ k $ estimations approximated by the $ t_{50} $-based empirical equations. On the other hand, the CPTu-based $ k $ estimates were considerably different from the $ t_{50} $-based estimations. Besides, three undisturbed soil samples were taken by the 132 mm TUNI tube sampler in the field. These samples were used in the lab to measure the soil permeability, $ k $, experimentally. Comparison of the experimental measurements with the $k$ estimates highlighted the significance of the improvement required for the available empirical equations to estimate $ k $ for the studied coarse silts.

    Citation: Mohammad Sadegh Farhadi, Eetu Pöyry, Tim Tapani Länsivaara. Permeability of coarse silts using dissipation tests in cone penetration test: Case study, Finninmäki testing site[J]. AIMS Geosciences, 2025, 11(4): 885-906. doi: 10.3934/geosci.2025038

    Related Papers:

  • Dissipation tests were performed at the Finninmäki testing site, Tampere, Finland, through the cone penetration test (CPTu). In these tests, both contractive and dilative behaviors were observed. The parameter $ t_{50} $, the time when 50$ \% $ of initial pore pressure, $ u_2 $, dissipates, was computed for the tests using three methods proposed in literature. Then, soil permeability, $ k $, was estimated following two approaches, using either $ t_{50} $-based empirical equations or CPTu-based methods. It was observed that the $ t_{50} $ values interpreted from the three methods were considerably different. The differences in the estimated $ t_{50} $ values led to considerably variable $ k $ estimations approximated by the $ t_{50} $-based empirical equations. On the other hand, the CPTu-based $ k $ estimates were considerably different from the $ t_{50} $-based estimations. Besides, three undisturbed soil samples were taken by the 132 mm TUNI tube sampler in the field. These samples were used in the lab to measure the soil permeability, $ k $, experimentally. Comparison of the experimental measurements with the $k$ estimates highlighted the significance of the improvement required for the available empirical equations to estimate $ k $ for the studied coarse silts.



    加载中


    [1] Robertson PK (2010) Estimating in-situ soil permeability from CPT & CPTu, In: Robertson PK, Mayne PW, Eds., 2nd international symposium on cone penetration testing, Huntington Beach, California, USA, 535-542.
    [2] Parez L, and Fauriel R (1988) Le piézocône améliorations apportées à la reconnaissance des sols. Rev Franç Géotech 44: 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1051/geotech/1988044013 doi: 10.1051/geotech/1988044013
    [3] Ziaie-Moayed R, Naeini SA, Baziar MH (2009) Strength-flow parameters of loose silty sands from piezocone tests. AUT J Model Simul 41: 15-23. https://doi.org/10.22060/miscj.2009.236 doi: 10.22060/miscj.2009.236
    [4] Lech M, Marek B, Markowska-Lech K, et al. (2023) Evaluating hydraulic parameters in clays based on in situ tests. Open Eng 13: 20220483. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2022-0483 doi: 10.1515/eng-2022-0483
    [5] Robertson PK, Sully JP, Woeller DJ, et al. (1992) Estimating coefficient of consolidation from piezocone tests. Can Geotech J 29: 539-550. https://doi.org/10.1139/t92-061 doi: 10.1139/t92-061
    [6] Henderson E (1994) Evaluation of the time response of pore pressure measurements. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [7] Hébert MC (2013) The importance of accurate pore water pressure measurements when conducting CPTu as exemplified using data collected in Christchurch following the Canterbury earthquake sequence, In: Chin CY, Eds., 19th NZGS Geotechnical Symposium, Queenstown, New Zealand.
    [8] Sully JP, Robertson PK, Campanella RG, et al. (1999) An approach to evaluation of field CPTU dissipation data in overconsolidated fine-grained soils. Can Geotech J 36: 369-381. https://doi.org/10.1139/t98-105 doi: 10.1139/t98-105
    [9] Chai J, Daichao S, Carter JP, et al. (2012) Coefficient of consolidation from non-standard piezocone dissipation curves. Comput Geotech 41: 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.11.005 doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.11.005
    [10] Robertson PK (2009) Interpretation of cone penetration tests—a unified approach. Can Geotech J 46: 1337-1355. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-065 doi: 10.1139/T09-065
    [11] Mayne PW, Cargill E, Greig J (2023) The cone penetration test: A CPT design manual. Available from: ConeTec Group, Canada.
    [12] Robertson PK, Cabal K (2022) Guide to cone penetration testing, 7 Eds., Signal Hill, California, Gregg Drilling & Testing Inc.
    [13] Maanmittauslaitos kartta, 2025. Available from: https://asiointi.maanmittauslaitos.fi/karttapaikka/?lang = en.
    [14] Google Earth Pro, Version 7.3.6, 2025. Available from: https://www.google.com/earth/.
    [15] Pöyry E, Farhadi MS, Haikola M, et al. (2024) Soil plugging in small diameter tube samplers in silty soils, In: Guerra N, Fernandes NN, Ferreira C., et al. Eds., Geotechnical Engineering Challenges to Meet Current and Emerging Needs of Society, CRC Press, 745-749.
    [16] ISO 22476-1, Geotechnical investigation and testing–-Field testing–-Part 1: Electrical cone and piezocone penetration test, Standards from ISO are available both individually, directly through the ANSI webstore, and as part of a Standards Subscription.
    [17] Golestani Dariani AA, Ahmadi MM (2021) Generation and dissipation of excess pore water pressure during CPTu in clayey soils: a numerical approach. Geotech Geol Eng 39: 3639-3653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01716-z doi: 10.1007/s10706-021-01716-z
    [18] Paniagua López AP, Carroll R, L'Heureux, JS, et al. (2016) Monotonic and dilatory excess pore water dissipations in silt following CPTU at variable penetration rate, In: Lehane BM, Acosta-Martínez HE, Kelly R, Eds., Fifth International Conference on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization (ISC'5). 5: 509–514.
    [19] Silva MF (2005) Numerical and physical models of rate effects in soil penetration, Doctoral dissertation, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
    [20] Robertson PK (2016) Cone penetration test (CPT)-based soil behaviour type (SBT) classification system—an update. Can Geotech J 53: 1910-1927. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2016-0044 doi: 10.1139/cgj-2016-0044
    [21] Farhadi MS, Länsivaara TT, Tonni L (2022) Application of integrated Game Theory-optimization subground stratification (-IGTOSS) model to Venetian Lagoon deposits, In: Gottardi G, Tonni L, Eds., Cone Penetration Testing 2022, CRC Press, 394-399. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003308829-54
    [22] Farhadi MS, Länsivaara TT, and L'Heureux JS, et al. (2022) Application of two novel CPTu-based stratification models, In: Gottardi G, Tonni L, Eds., Cone Penetration Testing 2022, CRC Press, 400-406. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003308829-55
    [23] Farhadi MS, Länsivaara TT (2022) Development of an integrated game theory-optimization subground stratification model using cone penetration test (CPT) measurements. Eng Comput 38: 1227-1242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01243-0 doi: 10.1007/s00366-020-01243-0
    [24] Mayne PW, Peuchen J, Bouwmeester D (2010) Soil unit weight estimation from CPTs, In: Robertson PK, Mayne PW, Eds., 2nd International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, Huntington Beach, CA, USA.
    [25] Burns SE, Mayne PW (1998) Monotonic and dilatory pore-pressure decay during piezocone tests in clay. Can Geotech J 35: 1063-1073.
    [26] Fu S, Shen Y, Jia X, et al. (2024) A novel method for estimating the undrained shear strength of marine soil based on CPTU tests. J Mar Sci Eng 12: 1019. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12061019 doi: 10.3390/jmse12061019
    [27] Jamiolkowki M, Ladd CC, Germaine JT, et al. (1985) New developments in field and laboratory testing of soils, In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, San Fransisco, Balkema (AA).
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2025 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(338) PDF downloads(46) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(11)  /  Tables(6)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog