Research article Special Issues

Deterministic solvency thresholds and RL-based premium calibration for life insurance under age-structured epidemics

  • Published: 26 May 2026
  • We develop a deterministic framework that links epidemic propagation, mortality risk, and life-insurance solvency by modeling the population through an age-structured SEIRD system in which disease-induced deaths drive an insurer's surplus process governed by an ordinary differential equation with a continuous premium inflow and death-benefit outflow. We characterize the disease-free equilibrium and show that its local stability depends on the basic reproduction number $ \mathcal{R}_0 $, and for any finite horizon $ [0, T] $, we derive an explicit solvency threshold in the form of a critical premium $ p_{\mathrm{crit}}(T) $ that guarantees a nonnegative surplus and depends on the age-weighted infection burden. For large horizons, we obtain an analytically tractable approximation of this threshold using multi-group final-size relations and show that it monotonically increases with epidemic severity. To illustrate practical implications, we formulate an age-specific premium selection as a one-shot continuous-action reinforcement-learning problem in which a Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) agent is trained on simulated age-structured epidemic scenarios to choose premiums that avoid ruin while remaining near actuarially fair levels; out-of-sample tests confirm that the learned premiums satisfy the analytical solvency constraints, deliver low ruin probabilities, and achieve tight fairness calibration. The combined analytical and numerical results provide a transparent basis for epidemic-sensitive premium design and stress testing of life-insurance portfolios.

    Citation: Bizhigit Sagidolla, Shirali Kadyrov. Deterministic solvency thresholds and RL-based premium calibration for life insurance under age-structured epidemics[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2026, 34(7): 4512-4534. doi: 10.3934/era.2026199

    Related Papers:

  • We develop a deterministic framework that links epidemic propagation, mortality risk, and life-insurance solvency by modeling the population through an age-structured SEIRD system in which disease-induced deaths drive an insurer's surplus process governed by an ordinary differential equation with a continuous premium inflow and death-benefit outflow. We characterize the disease-free equilibrium and show that its local stability depends on the basic reproduction number $ \mathcal{R}_0 $, and for any finite horizon $ [0, T] $, we derive an explicit solvency threshold in the form of a critical premium $ p_{\mathrm{crit}}(T) $ that guarantees a nonnegative surplus and depends on the age-weighted infection burden. For large horizons, we obtain an analytically tractable approximation of this threshold using multi-group final-size relations and show that it monotonically increases with epidemic severity. To illustrate practical implications, we formulate an age-specific premium selection as a one-shot continuous-action reinforcement-learning problem in which a Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) agent is trained on simulated age-structured epidemic scenarios to choose premiums that avoid ruin while remaining near actuarially fair levels; out-of-sample tests confirm that the learned premiums satisfy the analytical solvency constraints, deliver low ruin probabilities, and achieve tight fairness calibration. The combined analytical and numerical results provide a transparent basis for epidemic-sensitive premium design and stress testing of life-insurance portfolios.



    加载中


    [1] D. I. J. Samaranayake, D. L. M. Samaranayake, Insurance contract for epidemiological diseases spread, Sri Lanka J. Econ. Res., 5 (2018), 103–124. http://doi.org/10.4038/sljer.v5i2.51 doi: 10.4038/sljer.v5i2.51
    [2] C. Lefèvre, P. Picard, M. Simon, Epidemic risk and insurance coverage, J. Appl. Prob., 54 (2017), 286–303. http://doi.org/10.1017/jpr.2016.100 doi: 10.1017/jpr.2016.100
    [3] S. Kadyrov, G. Kayumova, A. Yallaboyev, B. Sagidolla, A compartmental epidemic model with age stratification for insurance premium calculation, Math. Biosci. Eng., 22 (2025), 3088–3106. http://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2025114 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2025114
    [4] D. Hainaut, An actuarial approach for modeling pandemic risk, Risks, 9 (2021), 3. http://doi.org/10.3390/risks9010003 doi: 10.3390/risks9010003
    [5] C. Zhai, P. Chen, Z. Jin, T. K. Siu, Epidemic modelling and actuarial applications for pandemic insurance: a case study of Victoria, Australia, Ann. Actuarial Sci., 18 (2024), 242–269. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1748499523000246 doi: 10.1017/S1748499523000246
    [6] A. Zinihi, M. Ehrhardt, M. R. S. Ammi, Actuarial analysis of an infectious disease insurance based on an SEIARD epidemiological model, preprint, arXiv: 2508.06580. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.06580
    [7] J. Hoseana, F. Kusnadi, G. Stephanie, L. Loanardo, C. Wijaya, Design and financial analysis of a health insurance based on an SIH-type epidemic model, preprint, arXiv: 2408.05397. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.05397
    [8] M. S. Jameaba, Digitalization, emerging technologies, and financial stability: Challenges and opportunities for the Indonesian banking industry and beyond, Qeios, 2022. https://doi.org/10.32388/CSTTYQ.2
    [9] J. Achiam, D. Held, A. Tamar, P. Abbeel, Constrained policy optimization, in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 70 (2017), 22–31.
    [10] L. Mercuri, A. Perchiazzo, E. Rroji, A Hawkes model with CARMA (p, q) intensity, Insur. Math. Econ., 116 (2024), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2024.01.007 doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2024.01.007
    [11] A. Swishchuk, R. Zagst, G. Zeller, Hawkes processes in insurance: risk model, application to empirical data and optimal investment, Insur. Math. Econ., 101 (2021), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.12.005 doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.12.005
    [12] F. E. Benth, C. Klüppelberg, G. Müller, L. Vos, Futures pricing in electricity markets based on stable CARMA spot models, Energy Econ., 44 (2014), 392–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.03.020 doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.03.020
    [13] European Parliament and Council, Directive 2009/138/EC of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency Ⅱ), Official Journal of the European Union, 2009. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2009/138/oj.
    [14] C. Baumgart, J. Krebs, R. Lempertseder, O. Pfaffel, Quantifying life insurance risk using least-squares Monte Carlo, preprint, arXiv: 1910.03951. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1910.03951
    [15] L. Dede, N. Parolini, A. Quarteroni, G. Villani, G. Ziarelli, SEIHRDV: a multi-age multi-group epidemiological model and its validation on the COVID-19 epidemics in Italy, preprint, arXiv: 2501.04148. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.04148
    [16] I. Rodiah, P. Vanella, A. Kuhlmann, V. K. Jaeger, M. Harries, G. Krause, et al., Age-specific contribution of contacts to transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in Japan, Eur. J. Epidemiol., 38 (2023), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-022-00938-6 doi: 10.1007/s10654-022-00938-6
    [17] Z. Vizi, E. K. Korir, N. Bogya, C. Rosztoczi, G. Makay, P. Boldog, Age group sensitivity analysis of epidemic models: investigating the impact of contact matrix structure, preprint, arXiv: 2502.19206. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.19206
    [18] M. De la Sen, A. Ibeas, S. Alonso-Quesada, R. Nistal, On a new epidemic model with asymptomatic and dead-infective subpopulations with feedback controls useful for Ebola disease, Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc., 2017 (2017), 4232971. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4232971 doi: 10.1155/2017/4232971
    [19] G. Stamov, I. Stamova, N. Simeonova, K. Gabrovska, S. Simeonov, Stability of sets for Ebola virus disease models through impulsive conformable approach, Mathematics, 14 (2026), 1108. https://doi.org/10.3390/math14071108 doi: 10.3390/math14071108
    [20] N. Wang, L. Zhang, Y. Luo, Z. Teng, Global stability for a cumulative release Ebola epidemic model from the corpses and infected individuals, Infect. Dis. Modell., 10 (2025), 1291–1306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idm.2025.07.002 doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2025.07.002
    [21] T. Rolski, H. Schmidli, V. Schmidt, J. L. Teugels, Stochastic Processes for Insurance and Finance, John Wiley & Sons, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470317044
    [22] L. Palmborg, F. Lindskog, Premium control with reinforcement learning, ASTIN Bull., 53 (2023), 233–257. https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2023.13 doi: 10.1017/asb.2023.13
    [23] S. Singireddy, Reinforcement learning approaches for pricing condo insurance policies, Am. J. Anal. Artif. Intell., 2023.
    [24] C. Xuan, F. Zhang, F. Yin, H. K. Lam, Constrained proximal policy optimization, preprint, arXiv: 2305.14216. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.14216
    [25] J. Schulman, F. Wolski, P. Dhariwal, A. Radford, O. Klimov, Proximal policy optimization algorithms, preprint, arXiv: 1707.06347. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1707.06347
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(132) PDF downloads(15) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(5)  /  Tables(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog