Research article

Consensus of multi-agent system with disturbance based on dynamical event-triggered control

  • Published: 16 March 2026
  • This study addresses the consensus problem of multi-agent systems (MAS) subject to external disturbance. Considering the presence of external disturbance factors, a theoretical analysis of consensus for distributed MAS is conducted. First, a state observer and an adaptive disturbance observer are designed to estimate both the node states and disturbance states of each agent in the system. Subsequently, a dynamic event-triggered control strategy is formulated based on the estimated values from the observers. Notably, the dynamic event-triggered strategy incorporates dynamically adjustable parameters, offering enhanced flexibility compared to conventional static event-triggered strategies. Using Lyapunov stability theory and inequality techniques, sufficient conditions for achieving consensus in disturbed MAS are derived. Finally, a numerical example is provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the observers, control strategies, and theoretical results. This work provides new solutions for the consensus control of heterogeneous MAS with external disturbance, where both the obsever and the dynamic event-triggered controller are equipped with adjustable parameters, rendering the approach more practical for real-world applications.

    Citation: Sijiao Sun, Chengyi Jia, Fang Han. Consensus of multi-agent system with disturbance based on dynamical event-triggered control[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2026, 34(4): 2303-2320. doi: 10.3934/era.2026104

    Related Papers:

  • This study addresses the consensus problem of multi-agent systems (MAS) subject to external disturbance. Considering the presence of external disturbance factors, a theoretical analysis of consensus for distributed MAS is conducted. First, a state observer and an adaptive disturbance observer are designed to estimate both the node states and disturbance states of each agent in the system. Subsequently, a dynamic event-triggered control strategy is formulated based on the estimated values from the observers. Notably, the dynamic event-triggered strategy incorporates dynamically adjustable parameters, offering enhanced flexibility compared to conventional static event-triggered strategies. Using Lyapunov stability theory and inequality techniques, sufficient conditions for achieving consensus in disturbed MAS are derived. Finally, a numerical example is provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the observers, control strategies, and theoretical results. This work provides new solutions for the consensus control of heterogeneous MAS with external disturbance, where both the obsever and the dynamic event-triggered controller are equipped with adjustable parameters, rendering the approach more practical for real-world applications.



    加载中


    [1] H. Wang, W. Ren, W. Yu, D. Zhang, Fully distributed consensus control for a class of disturbed second-order multi-agent systems with directed networks, Automatica, 132 (2021), 109816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2021.109816 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2021.109816
    [2] Y. Luo, X. Xiao, J. Cao, A. Li, G. Lin, Event-triggered guaranteed cost consensus control for second-order multi-agent systems based on observers, Inf. Sci., 546 (2021), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.08.010 doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2020.08.010
    [3] M. Li, Z. Wu, F. Deng, B. Guo, Active disturbance rejection control to consensus of second-order stochastic multiagent systems, IEEE Trans. Control Network Syst., 10 (2023), 993–1004. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCNS.2022.3213710 doi: 10.1109/TCNS.2022.3213710
    [4] X. Li, Q. Zhou, P. Li, H. Li, R. Lu, Event-triggered consensus control for multi-agent systems against false data-injection attacks, ‌IEEE Trans. Cybern.‌, 50 (2020), 1856–1866. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2019.2937951 doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2019.2937951
    [5] R. Postoyan, P. Tabuada, D. Nešić, A. Anta, A framework for the event-triggered stabilization of nonlinear systems, ‌IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 60 (2015), 982–996. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2014.2363603 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2014.2363603
    [6] K. Li, L. Ji, S. Yang, H. Li, X. Liao, Couple-group consensus of cooperative-competitive heterogeneous multiagent systems: A fully distributed event-triggered and pinning control method, IEEE Trans. Cybern., 52 (2022), 4907–4915. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2020.3024551 doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2020.3024551
    [7] M. Chen, X. Bu, J. Liang, Q. Liu, X. Hui, Event-triggered model-free adaptive iterative learning cluster consensus control for nonlinear multi-agent systems, ‌Int. J. Control Autom. Syst., 23 (2025), 3440–3450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-025-0613-5 doi: 10.1007/s12555-025-0613-5
    [8] S. Thapa, H. Bai, J. A. Acosta, Cooperative aerial manipulation with decentralized adaptive force-consensus control, ‌J. Intell. Robot. Syst., 97 (2020), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-019-01048-4 doi: 10.1007/s10846-019-01048-4
    [9] Y. Xu, Y. Li, W. Li, Adaptive finite-time synchronization control for fractional-order complex-valued dynamical networks with multiple weights, ‌Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 85 (2020), 105239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2020.105239 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2020.105239
    [10] D. Zeng, L. Yang, R. Zhang, J. H. Park, Z. Pu, X. Xie, A new switching system protocol for synchronization in probability of RDNNs with stochastic sampling, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst., 53 (2023), 4358–4369. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2023.3246947 doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2023.3246947
    [11] Y. Sheng, Z. Zeng, Impulsive synchronization of stochastic reaction-diffusion neural networks with mixed time delays, Neural Networks, 103 (2018), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2018.03.010 doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2018.03.010
    [12] M. Abbasi, H. J. Marquez, Observer-based event-triggered consensus control of multi-agent systems with time-varying communication delays, IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., 21 (2024), 6336–6346. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2023.3324526 doi: 10.1109/TASE.2023.3324526
    [13] Z. Liang, S. Ding, Y. Jing, X. Xie, Aperiodic intermittent event-triggered synchronization control for discrete-time complex dynamical networks, Expert Syst. Appl., 237 (2024), 121500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121500 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121500
    [14] R. Koike, T. Endo, F. Matsuno, Output-based dynamic event-triggered consensus control for linear multi-agent systems, Automatica, 133 (2021), 109863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2021.109863 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2021.109863
    [15] A. I. Rikos, C. N. Hadjicostis, Distributed average consensus under quantized communication via event-triggered Mass summation, in 2018 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), (2018), 894–899. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2018.8619591
    [16] M. Dai, C. K. Ahn, J. Wu, C. Zhang, M. Gui, Performance adjustable event-triggered synchronization policies to nonlinear multi-agent systems, IEEE Syst. J., 16 (2022), 3646–3657. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2021.3089721 doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2021.3089721
    [17] Y. Xu, J. Sun, G. Wang, Z. Wu, Dynamic triggering mechanisms for distributed adaptive synchronization control and its application to circuit systems, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, 68 (2021), 2246–2256. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSI.2021.3060789 doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2021.3060789
    [18] S. Yuan, C. Yu, J. Sun, Hybrid adaptive event-triggered consensus control with intermittent communication and control updating, J. Syst. Sci. Complex., 37 (2024), 2390–2405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-024-3563-8 doi: 10.1007/s11424-024-3563-8
    [19] W. He, Z. Mo, Secure event-triggered consensus control of linear multi-agent systems subject to sequential scaling attacks, IEEE Trans. Cybern., 52 (2022), 10314–10327. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2021.3070356 doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2021.3070356
    [20] Z. Yang, Robust consensus tracking of second-order nonlinear systems using relative position information by K-filter and disturbance observer based control, Int. J. Syst. Sci., 49 (2018), 3117–3129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2018.1533600 doi: 10.1080/00207721.2018.1533600
    [21] W. Zhao, X. Yao, Y. Liu, Disturbance observer-based boundary adaptive event-triggered consensus control of multiple flexible manipulators, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 33 (2025), 799–809. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2024.3489719 doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2024.3489719
    [22] J. Han, H. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. Liu, Disturbance observer based fault estimation and dynamic output feedback fault tolerant control for fuzzy systems with local nonlinear models, ISA Trans., 59 (2015), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2015.08.015 doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2015.08.015
    [23] G. Borghi, M. Herty, L. Pareschi, An adaptive consensus based method for multi-objective optimization with uniform Pareto front approximation, Appl. Math. Optim., 88 (2023), 58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-023-10036-y doi: 10.1007/s00245-023-10036-y
    [24] S. Yuan, C. Yu, J. Sun, Adaptive event-triggered consensus control of linear multi-agent systems with cyber attacks, Neurocomputing, 442 (2021), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2021.02.040 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.02.040
    [25] X. Feng, Y. Yang, D. Wei, Adaptive fully distributed consensus for a class of heterogeneous nonlinear multi-agent systems, Neurocomputing, 428 (2021), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.11.043 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.11.043
    [26] S. Shi, Z. Wang, Q. Song, M. Xiao, G. Jiang, Leader-following quasi-bipartite synchronization of coupled heterogeneous harmonic oscillators via event-triggered control, Appl. Math. Comput., 427 (2022), 127172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2022.127172 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2022.127172
    [27] J. He, B. Peng, Z. Feng, S. Zhong, B. He, G. Wang, A Gaussian mixture unscented Rauch-Tung-Striebel smoothing framework for trajectory reconstruction, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., 20 (2024), 7481–7491. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2024.3360478 doi: 10.1109/TII.2024.3360478
    [28] J. He, B. Peng, G. Wang, A non-linear non-Gaussian filtering framework based on the Gaussian noise model jump assumption, Automatica, 178 (2025), 112360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2025.112360 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2025.112360
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2026 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1195) PDF downloads(286) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(8)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog