Mathematical and sociological investigation of two-region migration model in bigeometric calculus

Mehmet Çağrı YILMAZER; Merve Sefa YILMAZ; Mehmet Çağrı YILMAZER; Merve Sefa YILMAZ

doi:10.3934/era.2025198

Electronic Research Archive

2025, Volume 33, Issue 7: 4343-4362. doi: 10.3934/era.2025198

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Mathematical and sociological investigation of two-region migration model in bigeometric calculus

Mehmet Çağrı YILMAZER ¹,
Merve Sefa YILMAZ ^{2
,
,}

1.
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Firat University, Elazığ, Türkiye
2.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye

Received: 24 March 2025 Revised: 01 July 2025 Accepted: 15 July 2025 Published: 29 July 2025

The two-region migration model is an important tool for analyzing population movements and evaluating their economic, social, and environmental impacts. This model mathematically examines the reasons and consequences of individuals that migrate from one region to another, thereby shedding light on issues such as labor force distribution, income differences, urbanization dynamics, and regional development. This migration model, which has a significant impact on classical analyses, is defined in bigeometric calculus, and solved by the bigeometric Laplace transform. In addition, the numerical patterns and curves presented by mathematical modeling in these two migration analyses are interpreted within the framework of sociological theories, thus demonstrating that the phenomenon of migration is not only quantitative but is also too complex to be limited to socially constructed numerical data and is closely linked to the historical process.
- multiplicative calculus,
- two region migration model,
- migration theories
Citation: Mehmet Çağrı YILMAZER, Merve Sefa YILMAZ. Mathematical and sociological investigation of two-region migration model in bigeometric calculus[J]. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(7): 4343-4362. doi: 10.3934/era.2025198

Related Papers:

Abstract

The two-region migration model is an important tool for analyzing population movements and evaluating their economic, social, and environmental impacts. This model mathematically examines the reasons and consequences of individuals that migrate from one region to another, thereby shedding light on issues such as labor force distribution, income differences, urbanization dynamics, and regional development. This migration model, which has a significant impact on classical analyses, is defined in bigeometric calculus, and solved by the bigeometric Laplace transform. In addition, the numerical patterns and curves presented by mathematical modeling in these two migration analyses are interpreted within the framework of sociological theories, thus demonstrating that the phenomenon of migration is not only quantitative but is also too complex to be limited to socially constructed numerical data and is closely linked to the historical process.

References

[1]	A. Swain, Increasing migration pressure and rising nationalism: Implications for multilateralism and SDG implementation, Third World Q., 17, (2019), 959–973. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35765.22240 doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35765.22240
[2]	A. Kraler, D. Reichel, Introduction to Migration Studies: An Interactive Guide to the Literatures on Migration and Diversity, Springer Nature, (2022), 439–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92377-8
[3]	M. Czaika, C. Reinprecht, Migration drivers: Why do people migrate, in Introduction to Migration Studies: An Interactive Guide to the Literatures on Migration and Diversity, (2022), 49–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92377-8_3
[4]	D. Sriskandarajah, Migration and Development: A Paper Prepared for the Policy Analysis and Research Programme of the Global Commission on International Migration, 2005. Available from: https://www.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl486/files/jahia/webdav/site/myjahiasite/shared/shared/mainsite/policy_and_research/gcim/tp/TP4.pdf.
[5]	W. Petersen, A general typology of migration, Am. Sociological Rev., 23 (1958), 256–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089239 doi: 10.2307/2089239
[6]	L. Kurekova, Theories of migration: Conceptual review and empirical testing in the context of the EU East-West flows, in Interdisciplinary Conference on Migration Economic Change, Social Challenge, 4 (2011), 6–9.
[7]	D. S. Massey, J. Arango, G. Hugo, A. Kouaouci, A. Pellegrino, J. E. Taylor, Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal, Popul. Dev. Rev., 19 (1993), 431–466. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938462 doi: 10.2307/2938462
[8]	A. Rogers, Matrix Analysis of Interregional Population Growth and Distribution, University of California Press, 1968. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01940322
[9]	A. Rogers, J. Ledent, Multiregional population projection, in IFIP Technical Conference on Optimization Techniques, (1975), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-07622-0_460
[10]	N. Keyfitz, Do cities grow by natural increase or by migration, Geogr. Anal., 12 (1980), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1980.tb00024.x doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1980.tb00024.x
[11]	M. P. Todaro, A model of labor migration and urban unemployment in less developed countries, Am. Econ. Rev., 59 (1969), 138–148.
[12]	C. Camacho, A. Pérez-Barahona, A model in continuous time and space to study economic migration, Math. Modell. Natural Phenom., 14 (2019), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1051/mmnp/2018077 doi: 10.1051/mmnp/2018077
[13]	L. Harding, M. Neamţu, A dynamic model of unemployment with migration and delayed policy intervention, Comput. Econ., 51 (2018), 427–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-016-9610-3 doi: 10.1007/s10614-016-9610-3
[14]	V. Volpert, S. Petrovskii, A. Zincenko, Interaction of human migration and wealth distribution, Nonlinear Anal., 159 (2017), 408–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2017.02.024 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2017.02.024
[15]	M. Grossman, R. Katz, Non-Newtonian Calculus, Lee Press, Piegon Cove, Massachusetts, 1972.
[16]	M. Grossman, Bigeometric Calculus: A System with A Scale-Free Derivative, Archimedes Foundation, Massachusetts, 1983.
[17]	D. Stanley, A multiplicative calculus, Probl. Resour. Issues Math. Undergrad. Stud., 4 (1999), 310–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511979908965937
[18]	K. Boruah, B. Hazarika, G-calculus, TWMS J. Appl. Eng. Math., 8 (2018), 94–105.
[19]	M. Erdogan, C. Duyar, Non-Newtonian improper integrals, J. Sci. Arts, 18 (2018), 49–74.
[20]	D. Filip, C. Piatecki, An overview on the non-newtonian calculus and its potential applications to economics, Appl. Math. Comput., 187 (2007), 68–78.
[21]	D. A. Filip, C. Piatecki, A Non-Newtonian Examination of the Theory of Exogenous Economic Growth, Ph.D thesis, Université d'Orléans (UO), 2014.
[22]	F. Córdova-Lepe, The multiplicative derivative as a measure of elasticity in economics, TEMAT-Theaeteto Atheniensi Math., 2 (2006), 1–8.
[23]	A. E. Bashirov, E. M. Kurpınar, A. Özyapıcı, Multiplicative calculus and its applications, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 337 (2008), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.03.08 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.03.08
[24]	U. Kadak, M. Özlük, Generalized Runge-Kutta Method with respect to the non-Newtonian calculus, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2015 (2015), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/594685 doi: 10.1155/2015/594685
[25]	N. Yalcin, E. Celik, A. Gokdogan, Multiplicative Laplace transform and its applications, Optik, 127 (2016), 9984–9995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.07.083 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.07.083
[26]	K. Boruah, B. Hazarika, Bigeometric integral calculus, TWMS J. Appl. Eng. Math., 8 (2018), 374–385.
[27]	K. Boruah, B. Hazarika, Some basic properties of bigeometric calculus and its applications in numerical analysis, Afr. Mat., 32 (2021), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13370-020-00821-1 doi: 10.1007/s13370-020-00821-1
[28]	K. Boruah, B. Hazarika, A. E. Bashirov, Solvability of bigeometric differential equations by numerical methods, Bol. Soc. Parana. Mat., 39 (2021), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.5269/bspm.39444 doi: 10.5269/bspm.39444
[29]	N. Yalçın, M. Dedeturk, Solutions of multiplicative ordinary differential equations via the multiplicative differential transform method, AIMS Math., 6 (2021), 3393–3409. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021203 doi: 10.3934/math.2021203
[30]	S. Kaymak, N. Yalçın, On bigeometric Laplace integral transform, J. Inst. Sci. Technol., 13 (2023), 2042–2056. https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.1283580 doi: 10.21597/jist.1283580
[31]	S. Georgiev, K. Zennir, Multiplicative Differential Calculus, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003299080
[32]	J. Ledent, The Dynamics of Two Demographic Models of Urbanization, IIASA Research Memorondum, 1978. Available from: https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/941.
[33]	I. Aleshkovski, V. Iontsev, Mathematical models of migration, Syst. Anal. Model. Integr. World Syst., 2 (2006), 185–213.
[34]	S. Bertoli, J. F. H. Moraga, Gravity models in the migration and development nexus, Rev. D'écon. Dévelop., 25 (2017), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.3917/edd.313-314.0069 doi: 10.3917/edd.313-314.0069
[35]	R. M. Beyer, J. Schewe, H. Lotze-Campen, Gravity models do not explain, and cannot predict, international migration dynamics, Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., 9 (2022), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01067-x doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01067-x
[36]	Migration Research Foundation, 2024. Available from: https://gocvakfi.org/.
[37]	E. Kerobyan, Exploring the Relationship between Legal and Illegal Migration in the Context of the Migration Networks Theory: A Case Study on Turkish Migrants in Germany, 2015. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/29051102/Exploring_the_Relationship_between_Legal_and_Illegal_Migration_in_the_Context_of_the_Migration_Networks_Theory_a_Case_Study_on_Turkish_Migrants_in_Germany.
[38]	S. Castles, Why migration policies fail, Ethn. Racial Stud., 27 (2004), 205–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000177306

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2025 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)